At 01:10 AM 11/28/2005 -, you wrote:
>WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS. the radios
>are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the first to think of
>using the higer quality tube equipment. this equipment is very
>expensive and i was fortunate to have it donated
At 02:37 AM 11/28/2005 -, you wrote:
>First, who ever trained you must have been a brother to Maxwell Smart.
>How do you plan to get "the richest/fullest audio" with +/-5KC
>deviation.
<---Not to mention that a proper metaphor would be about the winkest link
in the chain. After all, the ab
What frequency pair are you planning to put this on?
By the model numbers you gave, I seriously doubt the FCC will
allow those radios on any commercial 2-way radio frequency.
If going into the amateur radio band, you will need to adjust
the transmitter deviation to conform with your
The transmitter in its present form - mobile chassis mount ... is
20% duty cycle at best.
us_communications1 wrote:
>
> the fact that they are mobiles and the design of the power supply
> make little difference an any piece of equipment can be
> re-engineered to perform a needed task.
T
Ok, I'll bite... what does "TAS" stand for?
Richard, N7TGB
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of nj902
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 7:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my fi
...
nj902 wrote:
>
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "us_communications1"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "...WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION OF HOW OTHERS DID THIS.
> the radios are 30+ years old so i can't believe that i am the
> first to think of using the higer quality tube
ECTED]
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:57:13 -0800
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my first repeater
What frequency pair are you planning to put this on?
By the model numbers you gave, I seriously doubt the FCC will
allow those radios on an
...
skipp025 wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I did not make myself clear. The repeater
> > i am building will be nearly hi-fidelity audio and
> > such is why i intend to use tube equipment.
>
> Z.! oop's I fell asleep. A tube
> repeater gear means you're obviously not paying the
> uti
Almost like the Heath-quit W5M audio amplifiers?
Neil
nj902 wrote:
>
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: " Ok, I'll bite... what does "TAS" stand for?"
> ___
>
> TAS = the absolute sound [www.theab
I'm in the TAB Books #1212 only ... name and picture.
Neil
nj902 wrote:
>
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Careful, my picture is in the Ken Sessions Book - Tab Books #1212."
> _
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:57:13 -0800
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: trying to build my first repeater
>
> What frequency pair are you planning to put this on?
>
> By the model numbers you gave, I serious
At 07:27 PM 11/27/05, you wrote:
>--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>" Ok, I'll bite... what does "TAS" stand for?"
>___
>
>TAS = the absolute sound [www.theabsolutesound.com]
>
>A high end audio publication.
>
That was my thought. But he missed April 1st.
Chuck
Al Wolfe wrote:
> I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
>
> 73,
> Al, K9SI
>
>
>Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
>From: "us_communications1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> ---
Unfortunately, I don't think so ...
Neil
Al Wolfe wrote:
>
> I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
>
> 73,
> Al, K9SI
>
>
>Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
>From: "us_communications1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: trying to build my first repe
Slightly ...
Neil
Chuck Kelsey wrote:
>
> That was my thought. But he missed April 1st.
>
> Chuck
>
> Al Wolfe wrote:
> > I think we've been had. This is obviously a joke isn't it?
> >
> > 73,
> > Al, K9SI
> >
> >
> >Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:10:07 -
> >From: "us_communi
Awesome, Hi Fidelity into my tinty sounding Kenwood, cheap external speaker, and better yet, that tiny little speaker in that tiny little HT. Why produce something that only so few radios will even notice the difference, if in fact you are able to make it. I heard and RC85 controller sound jus
16 matches
Mail list logo