sage: B=PermutationGroup(['(1,2,4,5,3)','(2,3,1,4,5)'])
sage: B == AlternatingGroup(5)
True
sage: B == AlternatingGroup(7)
False
On 5/05/2009, at 6:47 PM, jimfar wrote:
> I have generated a group using,
> sage: B=PermutationGroup(['(1,2,4,5,3)','(2,3,1,4,5)'])
> And I know I can generate a list
I have generated a group using,
sage: B=PermutationGroup(['(1,2,4,5,3)','(2,3,1,4,5)'])
And I know I can generate a list of the elements and determine the
order, but how do I show that this is actually
sage: AlternatingGroup(5).
Is there a command to verify that B=AlternatingGroup(5)?
--~--~
Thanks for your help.
sage:special.iti0k0(1.0)[0]
In SAGE,the integral can be used as special.iti0k0(1.0)[0], when I use
it as special.iti0k0(1)[0],the programme breaks an error!
But special.iti0k0(1)[0] works well in python.
On 5月4日, 下午9时03分, David Joyner wrote:
> Maybe you want the following?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM, gtg wrote:
>
> Hi I'm new to sage. Can you tell me how to construct finite fields
> using quotient of poly ring? For instance suppose I want to construct
> GF(5^2) using a GF(5) poly ring mod out by x^2 + x + 1 how do I do
> that? I can construct the quotient like
On May 4, 4:25 pm, gsw wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Georg,
> after several attempts I was able to produce a Sage-3.4.1dmg the
> contents of which are "drag-and-droppable", and the issue should not
> arise again (knock on wood) for future versions of Sage.
Well, since it always worked for me AFAIK
On May 4, 12:49 pm, Alessandro Torre
wrote:
> Hi.Here is the requested output
> (http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/df50...
> )
>
> Good Work.
> Alessandro
Hi Alessandro,
in the subsequent email you disassembled the whole file. What I wanted
was the output from
I describe the idea and technical issues in more details here:
http://sageworldmath.blogspot.com/
# Serge
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr
Hi all,
after several attempts I was able to produce a Sage-3.4.1dmg the
contents of which are "drag-and-droppable", and the issue should not
arise again (knock on wood) for future versions of Sage. Sorry for
that! I expect Sage 3.4.2 to be out before the end of the week, so you
might want to
See inline below.
Robert Bradshaw пишет:
> On Apr 30, 2009, at 10:13 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> On Apr 29, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Serge Salamanka wrote:
>>>
Is it a good idea to share objects between python processes with the
>
Hi
On 4 Kvě, 11:56, mabshoff
wrote:
> > Hello, not related to Sage, but if I remember correctly, newer Maxima
> > is in Debian Sid (compiled with GCL). This Sid version is slower than
> > 5.13 (with GCL also).
>
> Do you have any idea why that is and how much slowdown there is? What
> specifical
On May 4, 1:07 pm, gtg wrote:
> Hi I'm new to sage. Can you tell me how to construct finite fields
> using quotient of poly ring? For instance suppose I want to construct
> GF(5^2) using a GF(5) poly ring mod out by x^2 + x + 1 how do I do
> that? I can construct the quotient like this:
>
> p = 5
Hi I'm new to sage. Can you tell me how to construct finite fields
using quotient of poly ring? For instance suppose I want to construct
GF(5^2) using a GF(5) poly ring mod out by x^2 + x + 1 how do I do
that? I can construct the quotient like this:
p = 5
F = GF(p)
R. = F['x']
f = x * x + x + 1
S
I forgot the files...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/gr
Hi.Here is the requested output
(
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/df502c9e16565886
)
Good Work.
Alessandro
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2009, at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:02 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>>
>>> In order to plot zeta for real input, I have to do the following:
>>> def Zeta(x):
>>> return RR(zeta(x))
>>> plot(Zeta,2
On May 4, 2009, at 11:19 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> Actually, Dokchitser's algorithm only handles functions with finitely
>> many poles, so it won't be able to handle this if L(s) = 1/zeta(s).
>
> Yes, the series which comes from Moebius mu ends up being 1/zeta,
> essentially "because" mu is the Di
On May 4, 2009, at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:02 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> In order to plot zeta for real input, I have to do the following:
>> def Zeta(x):
>>return RR(zeta(x))
>> plot(Zeta,2,20)
>>
>> This is because
>> sage: zeta(2)
>> 1.64493406684823
>> s
Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Another Python builtin is pow(), but how is it possible that
>> type(pow(2,9,11)) returns
>>
>>
>> Or am I mistaken?
>
> The pow() builtin just calls __pow__ on the first argument in that
> case, which we control so we c
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Another Python builtin is pow(), but how is it possible that
>> type(pow(2,9,11)) returns
>>
>>
>> Or am I mistaken?
>
> The pow() builtin just calls __pow__ on the first argument in th
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Another Python builtin is pow(), but how is it possible that
> type(pow(2,9,11)) returns
>
>
> Or am I mistaken?
The pow() builtin just calls __pow__ on the first argument in that
case, which we control so we can return one of our types. len
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:02 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> In order to plot zeta for real input, I have to do the following:
> def Zeta(x):
> return RR(zeta(x))
> plot(Zeta,2,20)
>
> This is because
> sage: zeta(2)
> 1.64493406684823
> sage: type(zeta(2))
>
>
> which seems odd to me that pure real
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On May 4, 2009, at 10:45 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> len() is a Python builtin, which is a good indication that it will
> return Python types (especially when acting on a Python type). In
> fact, there's no way on the c-api level to return a Sage integer, as
> len() alway
In order to plot zeta for real input, I have to do the following:
def Zeta(x):
return RR(zeta(x))
plot(Zeta,2,20)
This is because
sage: zeta(2)
1.64493406684823
sage: type(zeta(2))
which seems odd to me that pure real complex number won't coerce to
the real field, or to float (which is what
> Actually, Dokchitser's algorithm only handles functions with finitely
> many poles, so it won't be able to handle this if L(s) = 1/zeta(s).
Yes, the series which comes from Moebius mu ends up being 1/zeta,
essentially "because" mu is the Dirichlet inverse of the unit function
u (where u(n)=1
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:13 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> >>> I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
>> >>> treated as a bug,
>>
>> >> This is not a bug. It's a stupid design decision in Python, which we
>
> Right, I knew that Python ints behaved this way, I was just surpris
> >>> I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
> >>> treated as a bug,
>
> >> This is not a bug. It's a stupid design decision in Python, which we
Right, I knew that Python ints behaved this way, I was just surprised
that somehow in Sage / didn't change this - I guess it's
On May 4, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On May 4, 2009, at 8:57 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> Dear Support,
>>
>> There are several calculators in reference/lfunctions.html for L-
>> functions. However, I am not quite sure what to do if I want a
>> "Dirichlet series" coming not from a c
On May 4, 11:01 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 4, 2009, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Good point, I hadn't though about that. We could introduce a size()
> or cardinality() method that returns an Integer, or possibly infinity.
Combinat already uses cardinality() since they need
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2009, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:45 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear support,
>>>
>>> I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
>>> treated as a bug,
>>
>> This is no
On May 4, 2009, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:45 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Dear support,
>>
>> I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
>> treated as a bug,
>
> This is not a bug. It's a stupid design decision in Python, which we
> have to
On May 4, 2009, at 10:45 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear support,
>
> I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
> treated as a bug, or whether someone using len() on lists should be
> assumed to know it might then be operated on with Python /, not
> Sage /, as opposed to the prep
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Alessandro Torre
wrote:
>
> putty cannot connect to the address you say.
> I think it is normal if sage fails to start.
putty should connect fine if you get a login prompt for the sage
virtual machine. Connecting via ssh has nothing to do with sage.
> I tried t
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:45 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Dear support,
>
> I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
> treated as a bug,
This is not a bug. It's a stupid design decision in Python, which we
have to live with until we switch to Python 3.0 or switch to doing
"fro
On May 4, 2009, at 8:57 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear Support,
>
> There are several calculators in reference/lfunctions.html for L-
> functions. However, I am not quite sure what to do if I want a
> "Dirichlet series" coming not from a character nor an elliptic curve,
> e.g. sum mu(n)/n^s for the
putty cannot connect to the address you say.
I think it is normal if sage fails to start.
I tried to use standard gdb logging to file, but I can't find gdb.txt
I tried to set another file, but it seems it doesn't work (I used "set
logging file mylog.txt")
Any hints?
I could ftp the log file to a
Dear support,
I assume this is known, but I am wondering whether it should be
treated as a bug, or whether someone using len() on lists should be
assumed to know it might then be operated on with Python /, not
Sage /, as opposed to the preparser catching this sort of thing.
sage: len([2,2])/len(
On May 4, 10:11 am, Iwan Lappo-Danilewski
wrote:
> Is there a chance that there will be executables that run on my work
> machine with the next release?
No, 3.4.2 won't have the fix, but 4.0 will in roughly two weeks.
> Or should I start compiling right now
> and maybe move to some SVN kind o
Is there a chance that there will be executables that run on my work
machine with the next release? Or should I start compiling right now
and maybe move to some SVN kind of thing?
For completeness sake:
i...@ivan-laptop:~/aps/sage-3.4.1-linux-Ubuntu_8.10-sse2-i686-Linux$ ./
sage -gdb
-
Dear Support,
There are several calculators in reference/lfunctions.html for L-
functions. However, I am not quite sure what to do if I want a
"Dirichlet series" coming not from a character nor an elliptic curve,
e.g. sum mu(n)/n^s for the Moebius mu function. I tried
sage: L = Dokchitser(cond
Maybe you want the following?
sage: from scipy import special
sage: RealNumber=float
sage: special.iti0k0(1.0)[0]
1.0865210970235892
See the thread
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/e344c0ccd32016f7
for more details.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:36 AM, liji.ma...@g
On May 4, 2:51 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 4 Kvě, 11:29, mabshoff
> wrote:
Hi,
>
>
> > I would suggest you complain in the Maxima group to have them take a
> > stake into packaging current Maxima releases for Debian/Ubuntu. AFAIK
> > the Maxima maintainer for Debian isn't exactly unde
On 4 Kvě, 11:29, mabshoff
wrote:
>
> I would suggest you complain in the Maxima group to have them take a
> stake into packaging current Maxima releases for Debian/Ubuntu. AFAIK
> the Maxima maintainer for Debian isn't exactly underworked, so I am
> sure he could use some help.
>
Hello, not r
On May 4, 2:16 am, chand sarat wrote:
> Dear All,
Hi,
> It is a fact that for a number of scientific packages, Ubuntu does offer
> fairly outdated packages:
> 1. Current Sage package: 3.4.1 and the version offered by Ubuntu 9.04 is
> Sage 3.0.5.
Help is on the way: Debian experimental should
Dear All,
It is a fact that for a number of scientific packages, Ubuntu does offer
fairly outdated packages:
1. Current Sage package: 3.4.1 and the version offered by Ubuntu 9.04 is
Sage 3.0.5.
2. Current Maxima package: 5.18. and the version offered by Ubuntu 9.04 is
Maxima 5.13.
3. Current Texliv
Hi,
This is great to hear about.
I have created a blog this night.
http://sageworldmath.blogspot.com/
Will be posting my experience with SAGE. I also run KUBUNTU 8.04 and
might add some documentation to the page you provided.
I suppose it is still better to compile latest version of SAGE rather
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:29 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> Is there enough space so you could try doing everything in /tmp or
> /local or some other *non*-NSF local partition?
>
I've just tried in /tmp and got exactly the same error. the log is
available here:
http://www.lri.fr/~oudinet/pub/deb
On May 4, 12:40 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I received the following question from my blog post at
>
> http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/03/22/clickable-mac-os-x-app-for-sage...
>
> I thought it's more appropriate as a sage-support question.
>
> > I have built the dmg package as descri
Hi folks,
I received the following question from my blog post at
http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/03/22/clickable-mac-os-x-app-for-sage-34/
I thought it's more appropriate as a sage-support question.
> I have built the dmg package as described. Everything is ok. When I double
> click on
> sage
Hello everyone!
I have a question about the integral of bessel function,I can
calculate the integral of bessel function by using Scipy lib.For
example,scipy.special.iti0k0(x)[0] means the integral of besseli(0, x)
from 0 to x.Is there any function like scipy.special.iti0k0(x)[0] in
the SAGE?
--~-
49 matches
Mail list logo
