> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Edwin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 4 December 2015 at 01:03, Scott Stults <
>> >> sstu...@opensourceconnections.com
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>
u, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
>> edwinye...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I'm using Solr 5.3.0.
>> > > Would like to find out, during a search, sometimes there is a match in
>&g
have to deal with a similar
> scenario (Solr 5.3.1 + large documents + highlighting).
> Which highlighter are you using?
>
> Andrea
>
> 2015-12-04 16:51 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using Solr 5.3.0
> >
Hi Zheng,
just curiousity, because shortly I will have to deal with a similar
scenario (Solr 5.3.1 + large documents + highlighting).
Which highlighter are you using?
Andrea
2015-12-04 16:51 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Solr 5.
Hi,
I'm using Solr 5.3.0
I found that in large documents, sometimes I face situation that when I do
a highlight query, the resultset that is returned does not contain the
highlighted query. There are actually matches in the documents, but just
that they located further back in the documents.
I
<a.gazzar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Zheng,
> > just curiousity, because shortly I will have to deal with a similar
> > scenario (Solr 5.3.1 + large documents + highlighting).
> > Which highlighter are you using?
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> >
there is a match in
> > content, but it is not highlighted (the word is not in the stopword
> list)?
> > Did I make any mistakes in my configuration?
> >
> > This is my highlighting request handler from solrconfig.xml.
> >
> >
> >
> > e
Hi,
I'm using Solr 5.3.0.
Would like to find out, during a search, sometimes there is a match in
content, but it is not highlighted (the word is not in the stopword list)?
Did I make any mistakes in my configuration?
This is my highlighting request handler from solrconfig.xml
it is not highlighted (the word is not in the stopword list)?
> Did I make any mistakes in my configuration?
>
> This is my highlighting request handler from solrconfig.xml.
>
>
>
> explicit
> 10
> json
> true
> tex
Thanks everyone who replied! The FastVectorHighlighter did the trick. Here
is how I configured it:
In solrconfig.xml:
In the requestHandler I added:
on
text
true
100
In schema.xml:
I modified the text field:
I restarted Solr, re-indexed the documents and tested. All phrases are
correctly
Hello everyone,
I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
here can offer some help. This is what I have currently:
Solr 4.9
solrconfig.xml (partial snip)
xml
explicit
10
Hi,
Did you try hl.mergeContiguous=true ?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Teague James <teag...@insystechinc.com>
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
> here can offer some help. This is what I have curre
,
> Did you try hl.mergeContiguous=true ?
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Teague James <teag...@insystechinc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
>> here can off
th options termVectors=true, termPositions=true and
termPositions=true.
Good luck!
Koji
On 2015/12/02 5:36, Teague James wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am having difficulty enabling phrase highlighting and am hoping someone
here can offer some help. This is what I have currently:
Solr 4.9
solr
or modification in the code under
> > JiebaSegmenter.java, and the highlighting seems to be fine now.
> >
> > Basically, I created another int called offset2 under process() method.
> > int offset2 = 0;
> >
> > Then I modified the offset to offset2 for this part of the c
com>
wrote:
> I've tried to do some minor modification in the code under
> JiebaSegmenter.java, and the highlighting seems to be fine now.
>
> Basically, I created another int called offset2 under process() method.
> int offset2 = 0;
>
> Then I modified the offset to offset
I've tried to do some minor modification in the code under
JiebaSegmenter.java, and the highlighting seems to be fine now.
Basically, I created another int called offset2 under process() method.
int offset2 = 0;
Then I modified the offset to offset2 for this part of the code under
process
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
> Highlighter for block join hasn't been implemented.
Here I'm wrong:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics
But how does highlighting work with block join query? Do I need to supply
additional parameter?
Yangrui
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> mkhlud...@griddyna
So if child document highlighting doesn't work how can I let solr tell
which child document and its field matched?
On Wednesday, November 4, 2015, Mikhail Khludnev <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Highlighter for block join hasn't been implemented. So, f
Hello,
Highlighter for block join hasn't been implemented. So, far you can call
highlighter with children query also passing fq={!child
..}parent-id:.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Yangrui Guo wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to highlight matched terms on child documents because
Hi
I want to highlight matched terms on child documents because I need to
determine which field matched the search terms. However when I use block
join solr returned empty highlight fields. How can I use highlight with
nested document? Or is there anyway to tell which field matched the query
and return all the parents ( and vice versa) but
not returning both children and parents together.
Because of this I believe could be a problem to highlight the content that
was in the children.
As nested faceting is becoming more complete I believe soon , also nested
Highlighting could become
references. Will look through them,
> and let you know if I find any solutions or workaround.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 27 October 2015 at 11:13, Scott Chu <scott@udngroup.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Take a look at Michael's 2 articles, they might help y
ght help you calrify the idea
> of highlighting in Solr:
>
> Changing Bits: Lucene's TokenStreams are actually graphs!
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/04/lucenes-tokenstreams-are-actually.html
>
> Also take a look at 4th paragraph In his another article:
>
> Changing
Take a look at Michael's 2 articles, they might help you calrify the idea of
highlighting in Solr:
Changing Bits: Lucene's TokenStreams are actually graphs!
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/04/lucenes-tokenstreams-are-actually.html
Also take a look at 4th paragraph In his another article
Hi Edward,
Took a lot of time to see if there's anything can help you to define the
cause of your problem. Maybe this might help you a bit:
[SOLR-4722] Highlighter which generates a list of query term position(s) for
each item in a list of documents, or returns null if highlighting
Chu,scott@udngroup.com
2015/10/22
- Original Message -
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
To: solr-user
Date: 2015-10-20, 12:04:11
Subject: Re: Highlighting content field problem when using JiebaTokenizerFactory
Hi Scott,
Here's my schema.xml for content and title, which uses text_chinese
in any way.
I have a following highlighting query: text:((foo AND bar) OR eggs).
Let's say the documents contains only bar and eggs. Currently both of
them are highlighted. However the desired behaviour is to highlight eggs
only since (foo AND bar) is not true.
The query I send has following
ition info. for that field and when Solr do highlighting, it retrieves wrong
position info. and mark wrong position of highlight target terms.
Scott Chu,scott@udngroup.com
2015/10/23
- Original Message -
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
To: solr-user
Date: 2015-10-22, 22:22:14
Subject: Re: Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> *From: *Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
> *To: *solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> *Date: *2015-10-20, 12:04:11
> *Subject: *Re: Highlighting content field problem when using
> JiebaTokenizerFactory
>
esn't have your problem. So I see
> this could be less suspect.
>
> The theory of your problem could be something in indexing process causes
> wrong position info. for that field and when Solr do highlighting, it
> retrieves wrong position info. and mark wrong position of highlight targe
in any way.
I have a following highlighting query: text:((foo AND bar) OR eggs).
Let's say the documents contains only bar and eggs. Currently both of
them are highlighted. However the desired behaviour is to highlight eggs
only since (foo AND bar) is not true.
The query I send has following
<edwinye...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the JiebaTokenizerFactory to index Chinese characters in
> Solr. It works fine with the segmentation when I'm using
> the Analysis function on the Solr Admin UI.
>
> However, when I tried to
Hi Scott,
Here's my schema.xml for content and title, which uses text_chinese. The
problem only occurs in content, and not in title.
Here's my solrconfig.xml on the highlighting portion:
explicit
10
json
Hi Scott,
Thank you for your reply.
I've tried to set that and also tried changing to Fast Vector Highlighter,
but it isn't working as well. I got the same highlighting results as
previously.
Regards,
Edwin
On 19 October 2015 at 23:56, Scott Stults <sstu...@opensourceconnections.com
>
the answer or workaround can
be deducted from them.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3390
http://qnalist.com/questions/661133/solr-is-highlighting-wrong-words
http://qnalist.com/questions/667066/highlighting-marks-wrong-words
Good luck!
Scott Chu,scott@udngroup.com
2015/10/20
Hi,
I'm trying to use the JiebaTokenizerFactory to index Chinese characters in
Solr. It works fine with the segmentation when I'm using
the Analysis function on the Solr Admin UI.
However, when I tried to do the highlighting in Solr, it is not
highlighting in the correct place. For example, when
Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone face the problem of when using highlighting, sometimes there
> are results which are returned, but there is no highlighting to the result
> (ie: no tag).
>
> I found that there is a match in another field whic
Hi,
Has anyone face the problem of when using highlighting, sometimes there are
results which are returned, but there is no highlighting to the result (ie:
no tag).
I found that there is a match in another field which I did not include in
my hl.fl parameters when I do fl=*, but that same word
In the end, in most open source projects, people implement that which
they need themselves, and offer it back to the community in the hope
that it will help others too.
If you need this, then I'd encourage you to look at the source
highlighting component and see if you can see how it might
) in the original string rather than returning an altered
string with tags inserted.
Mark
On 9/29/2015 7:04 AM, Upayavira wrote:
You can change the strings that are inserted into the text, and could
place markers that you use to identify the start/end of highlighting
elements. Does that work
hat
should be highlighted) in
the original string rather than returning an altered string with tags inserted.
Mark
On 9/29/2015 7:04 AM, Upayavira wrote:
You can change the strings that are inserted into the text, and could
place markers that you use to identify the start/end of highlighting
eleme
ould be highlighted) in
>> the original string rather than returning an altered string with tags
>> inserted.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>> On 9/29/2015 7:04 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> You can change the strings that are inserted into the text, and could
>>> place
You can change the strings that are inserted into the text, and could
place markers that you use to identify the start/end of highlighting
elements. Does that work?
Upayavira
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015, at 09:55 PM, Mark Fenbers wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I have highlighting turned on i
Greetings!
I have highlighting turned on in my Solr searches, but what I get back
is tags surrounding the found term. Since I use a SWT StyledText
widget to display my search results, what I really want is the offset
and length of each found term, so that I can highlight it in my own way
populated is tricky since
Tika has to deal with all the file formats which store
meta-data in various ways, i.e. Word is completely
unrelated to PDF which is unrelated to (pick your
file format here). But we can deal with that after you
get some basic highlighting done.
And I tend to prefer to do my Tika
appeared in the response instead of
just the text -- but the "highlighting" section of the response was still
virtually empty (just lists matching documents, but no highlighted text
fragments).
Can someone point me in the direction of a sample config that will work?
2. After that's work
Hi there,
I'm observing that the snippets being returned in the highlighting
section of the response are getting truncated. However, this behavior
is being seen only when the query matches a large number of documents
and the results requested are near the end of the Solr-returned
overall results
Hi,
I'm using Jieba analyser to index Chinese characters in the Solr. It works
fine with the segmentation when using the Anaylsis on the Solr Admin UI.
However, when I tried to do highlighting in Solr, it is not highlighting in
the correct place. For example, when I search for 自然环境与企业本身
to The First Church of
Christ, Scientist, Boston, Mass., June 15, 1902]}]
},
highlighting:{
/home/scott/workspace/mbel-work/tei2html/build/web/L13943/L13943.html:{},
/home/scott/workspace/mbel-work/tei2html/build/web/L03453/L03453.html:{},
/home/scott/workspace/mbel-work/tei2html/build/web/A10145
Well, the example you just showed shouldn't show any highlighting. Your query is
q=concord
so it's trying to highlight concord which isn't in any of your
documents. hl.q can be
used to highlight something other than your q parameter.
I did notice in some of your other examples that you seemed
. But the results below clearly show 3 hits
response:{numFound:3,start:0,docs:[
the problem is the hits are in _text_
Is there a problem with storing _text_ so I can get a highlight
fragment when a hit is found there?
Scott
Original Message
Subject: Re: Highlighting, all
of the highlighting away.
You should probably see the FastVectorHighlighter though. If you don't
use FVH, highlighting re-analyzes the raw text to produce the snippets
which may be expensive for large text fields.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Scott Derrick sc...@tnstaafl.net wrote
field(s) to
highlight.
p.s. Erick Erickson surely likes your e-mail domain :)
—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/
On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Scott Derrick sc...@tnstaafl.net wrote:
I guess I really don't get Highlighting in Solr
field(s) to
highlight.
p.s. Erick Erickson surely likes your e-mail domain :)
—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/
On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Scott Derrick sc...@tnstaafl.net wrote:
I guess I really don't get Highlighting in Solr
is the highlight section listing the first 10 matches, still empty {}
highlighting: {
/home/scott/workspace/mbel-work/tei2html/build/web/./L02634/L02634.html:
{},
/home/scott/workspace/mbel-work/tei2html/build/web/./A10720/A10720.html:
{},
/home/scott/workspace/mbel-work/tei2html/build/web/./L07894
...@tnstaafl.net wrote:
I guess I really don't get Highlighting in Solr.
We are transitioning from Google Custom Search which generally sucks, but
does return nicely formatted highlighted fragment.
I turn highlighting on hl=true in the query and I get a highlighting section
returned
I guess I really don't get Highlighting in Solr.
We are transitioning from Google Custom Search which generally sucks,
but does return nicely formatted highlighted fragment.
I turn highlighting on hl=true in the query and I get a highlighting
section returned at the bottom of the page, each
:)
—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/
On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Scott Derrick sc...@tnstaafl.net wrote:
I guess I really don't get Highlighting in Solr.
We are transitioning from Google Custom Search which generally sucks
5.2.1 and use dih example with tika integration to search
for pdf content. Everything work as expected except highlighting plugin.
When I execute the query I don't even see highlighting section in results:
{
responseHeader: {
status: 0,
QTime: 1,
params: {
indent: true,
q
Thank you for answer. When I execute the query using q=Warszawadf=text_index
instead of q=text_index:Warszawa nothing changed. If I remove wt=json from
query I got response in xml but also without highlight results.
Hi,
bq: I don't even see highlighting section in results
I mean, it is possible that you are hitting a request/search handler that does
not have highlighting component registered. This is possible when you
explicitly register components (query, facet, highlighting etc).
Lets first make sure
Hi,
I checked and for me config looks alright but if you can take a look it
will be great.
Here is whole solrconfig.xml:
http://pastebin.com/7YfVZA90
and here is full schema.xml:
http://pastebin.com/LgeAvtFf
and query result with enabled debug:
http://pastebin.com/i74Wyep3
Hi,
I couldn't find anything suspicious. It was allowed to highlight on an
indexed=false field as long as a tokenizer defined on it:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Properties+by+Use+Case
May be that is changed. Can you try to highlight on a both indexed and stored
I installed solr 5.2.1 and use dih example with tika integration to search
for pdf content. Everything work as expected except highlighting plugin.
When I execute the query I don't even see highlighting section in results:
{
responseHeader: {
status: 0,
QTime: 1,
params
Hi,
I'm using Solr 5.2.1, and sometimes, the highlighting return with results,
but there is no correct match in all the fields that are listed in hl.fl,
and there is also no em tag on the results at all.
What could be the reason that this is happening?
I've include my highlighting request
You need to xml encode the tags. So instead of em, put lt;emgt;
and instead of /em put lt;/emgt;
Upayavira
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015, at 05:19 PM, Paden wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get some Solr highlighting going but I've run into a small
problem. When I set the pre and post tags with my own
Try
str name=hl.simple.prelt;emgt;/str
or
str name=hl.simple.pre![CDATA[em]]/str
The bare and confuse the XML parsing.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Paden rumsey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get some Solr highlighting going but I've run into a small
problem. When
Within XML, angle brackets must be escaped as lt; and gt;
On Jul 13, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Paden rumsey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get some Solr highlighting going but I've run into a small
problem. When I set the pre and post tags with my own custom tag I get an
XML error
Hello,
I'm trying to get some Solr highlighting going but I've run into a small
problem. When I set the pre and post tags with my own custom tag I get an
XML error
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /em.
Location:
file:///home/paden/Downloads/solr-5.1.0/server/solr/Testcore2/conf
Rich,
I've run into various problems with group.query and highlighting. You noted
one below (SOLR-5046), and there is also SOLR-6712, which might be related to
what you are experiencing. Still waiting for that patch to be reviewed...
-Original Message-
From: Rich Hume [mailto:rh
I've been playing around with highlighting snippets and there are
times when I'd like to know if the snippet returned contains the
entire value of the original field or if the snippet is a truncated
version of the original field.
For example, when I search for xms below I can tell
the snippet
size you've specified?
Shot in the dark,
Erick
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When highlighting hits for the following query:
(+Contents:apple +Contents:watch) Contents:iphone
I expect the standard solr highlighter
Does watch exist in the Contents field somewhere outside the snippet
size you've specified?
Shot in the dark,
Erick
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When highlighting hits for the following query:
(+Contents:apple +Contents:watch) Contents:iphone
Hi,
When highlighting hits for the following query:
(+Contents:apple +Contents:watch) Contents:iphone
I expect the standard solr highlighter to highlight either iphone or iphone
AND apple, only if watch is present.
However, solr highlights iphone along with only apple. Is this a bug or a
known
to use Solr highlighting.
My problem is now, that the highlighting seems to work inconsistently which is
a problem in my use case.
The field configuration for e.g. my dynamic field '*_en' field is as follows:
dynamicField name=*_en type=text_enindexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false
Hi Edwin,
I think Highlighting Behaviour of those types shifts over time. May be we
should do the reverse.
Move snippets to main response: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3479
Ahmet
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:23 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo edwinye...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ahmet
the response, DocTransformers would be able to do output
restructuring. The best example is hit highlighting. If you did:
hl=onhl.fl=namefl=*,[highlight:name]
you would no longer need to seek the highlighted strings in another part
of the output.
The conceptual downside of this approach
highlighting. If you did:
hl=onhl.fl=namefl=*,[highlight:name]
you would no longer need to seek the highlighted strings in another part
of the output.
The conceptual downside of this approach is that we might expect the
highlighting to be done inside the DocTransfomer not a search component,
i.e
. Specifically, the
insertion of markup into the text changes values that affect sorting and
matching.
Thus the wisdom of the current design that returns highlighting results
separately.
Of course, it is very simple to merge the highlighting results into the
returned documents. The highlighting
Hi Edwin,
hl.alternateField is probably what you are looking for.
ahmet
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 5:38 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo edwinye...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to list all the fields in the highlighting portion in the
output?
Currently,even when I str name=hl.fl*/str
that returns highlighting results
separately.
Of course, it is very simple to merge the highlighting results into the
returned documents. The highlighting results have been thoughtfully
arranged as a lookup table using the unique ID field as the key. In
SolrJ, this is a Map. Thus, you can loop over
,
hl.alternateField is probably what you are looking for.
ahmet
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 5:38 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
edwinye...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to list all the fields in the highlighting portion in the
output?
Currently,even when I str name=hl.fl*/str, it only shows
Hi,
Is it possible to list all the fields in the highlighting portion in the
output?
Currently,even when I str name=hl.fl*/str, it only shows fields where
highlighting is possible, and fields which highlighting is not possible is
not shown.
I would like to have the output where all the fields
I am currently using Solr 4.5.1. In the hopes of seeing better query
performance, I have sharded an index and I am trying to use the shards
parameter along with grouping and highlighting. I am not currently using Solr
cloud.
I got past an earlier problem by adding a second sort parameter
.)
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Cheng, Sophia Kuen [mailto:sophia_ch...@hms.harvard.edu]
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 4:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Upgraded to 4.10.3, highlighting performance unusably slow
Hello,
We recently upgraded solr from
Thanks for the pointers. Using hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false does indeed
make it a lot faster. Obviously it's not really a solution, though,
since in 4.10 it wasn't a problem and turning it off has consequences.
I'm looking forward for the improvements in the next releases.
--Ere
8.5.2015,
I¹ve been looking into this again. The phrase highlighter is much slower
than the default highlighter, so you might be able to add
hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false to your query to make it faster. Note that
web interface will NOT help here, because that param is true by default,
and the checkbox is
I'm seeing the same with Solr 5.1.0 after upgrading from 4.10.2. Here
are my timings:
4.10.2:
process: 1432.0
highlight: 723.0
5.1.0:
process: 9570.0
highlight: 8790.0
schema.xml and solrconfig.xml are available at
https://github.com/NatLibFi/NDL-VuFind-Solr/tree/master/vufind/biblio/conf.
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Upgraded to 4.10.3, highlighting performance unusably slow
Hello,
We recently upgraded solr from 3.8.0 to 4.10.3. We saw that this upgrade
caused a incredible slowdown in our searches. We were able to narrow it
down to the highlighting. The slowdown is extreme
Hello,
We recently upgraded solr from 3.8.0 to 4.10.3. We saw that this upgrade
caused a incredible slowdown in our searches. We were able to narrow it down to
the highlighting. The slowdown is extreme enough that we are holding back our
release until we can resolve this. Our research
or vmstat command in
Linux.)
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Cheng, Sophia Kuen [mailto:sophia_ch...@hms.harvard.edu]
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 4:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Upgraded to 4.10.3, highlighting performance unusably slow
Hello,
We recently upgraded solr
-Original Message-
From: Cheng, Sophia Kuen [mailto:sophia_ch...@hms.harvard.edu]
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 4:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Upgraded to 4.10.3, highlighting performance unusably slow
Hello,
We recently upgraded solr from 3.8.0 to 4.10.3. We saw
Hi,
When I perform a query, the matching document related field information is
displayed separate from the highlighting information. Is there a way to
merge these two so that highlighting for each document appears within the
document level information itself. That way, it would be easier to find
I supposed currently the only way to show the highlighting snippets in xml
and json output is via a separate section at the bottom, and it is
currently not possible to show the highlighted snippets together with the
rest of the response?
Regards,
Edwin
On 22 April 2015 at 21:57, Zheng Lin Edwin
Hi,
I'm currently implementing highlighting on my Solr-5.0.0. When I issue the
following command:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=conducted
http://localhost:8983/solr/edmtechnical/select?q=conducted
hl=truehl.fl=Content,Summarywt=jsonindent=truerows=10,
the highlighting result
Hello All,
I am new to solr and trying to configure highlighting. If I look at the
result in xml, or json format, I can see the highlighting part of the
data and it looks good. However the velocity page does not show the
highlighted words on my result page. Do I need to do something extra
There's a JIRA ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4722 )
describing a highlighter which returns term positions rather than
snippets, which could then be mapped to the matching words in the indexed
document (assuming that it's stored or that you have a copy elsewhere).
-Simon
On Wed,
In Solr 5 (or 4), is there an easy way to retrieve the list of words to
highlight?
Use case: allow an external application to highlight the matching words
of a matching document, rather than using the highlighted snippets
returned by Solr.
Thanks,
Damien
201 - 300 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo