Re: News Videos Loading

On 9/3/2015 12:04 PM, Cecil Bankston wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 9/2/2015 12:17 PM, Cecil Bankston wrote: >>> EE wrote: >>>> Cecil Bankston wrote: >>>>> EE wrote: >>>>>> Brian Mailman wrote: >>>>>>> I like to open C

Bug 659285 - Extend media.autoplay.enabled to provide a way to disable untrusted play() invocations

Any chance that this bug fix is implemented in SeaMonkey versions above 2.35? (it is not available/working in 2.35) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659285 See the thread "News Videos Loading" (Message-ID: ) on the seamonkey support group mozilla.support.seamonkey ___

Re: SeaMonkey 2.35 release notes

On 9/3/2015 12:18 PM, EE wrote: > In the SM 2.35 release notes, it says: > After creating a news account through clicking a news URL, the MailNews > account wizard may be broken (the account type will always be News). To > work around the problem, set the mail.server.serverX.valid pref (where X

Re: SeaMonkey 2.35!

On 9/3/2015 8:14 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Dear All, > > I'm just so stoked. (This isn't a normal release post as it's just way > to special.) > > It is with great privilege and joy that I can announce to the world, the > SeaMonkey Project has just RELEASED SeaMonkey 2.35. > > SeaMonkey 2.33.1 wa

Re: Bug 659285 - Extend media.autoplay.enabled to provide a way to disable untrusted play() invocations

On 9/4/2015 5:20 AM, Neil wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >>Any chance that this bug fix is implemented in SeaMonkey versions above 2.35? >>(it is not available/working in 2.35) >> >>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659285 >> >> > From the t

Re: Enabling full screen for youtube videos

On 9/5/2015 8:33 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > To enable full screen for youtube videos type about:cofig in the address > bar browser window. > > In the widow that appears look for the search box and type "full" > > Change these two items from false to true: > > full-screen-api.content-only > >

Re: News Videos Loading

On 9/5/2015 9:49 AM, EE wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> >> I've found that the buttons do not work for all. Digging a little deeper >> finds there are several issues that cause the videos to play anyway: >> >> http://www.ghacks.net/2015/06/11/finally-mozilla-adds-wo

[Resolved] Re: Bug 659285 - Extend media.autoplay.enabled to provide a way to disable untrusted play() invocations

Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: Any chance that this bug fix is implemented in SeaMonkey versions above 2.35? (it is not available/working in 2.35) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659285 From the target milestone it looks as if you'll need to wait for SeaMonkey 2.38 for this.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a more complete lis

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a more complete lis

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

NoOp wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 09/09/2015 03:44 AM, Neil wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? > > By design, I'm afraid. > Thanks Neil. I found the bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161183 Extension/plugin name i

Re: SeaMonkey 2.35 and extensions

On 09/10/2015 09:21 AM, sean wrote: > On 09/05/2015 06:39 AM, Wolf wrote: >> Thanks a lot to the SeaMonkey Project team for their hard work to keep >> SeaMonkey alive. >> >> My question: >> Will these extensions work with the new version of SeaMonkey 2.35: >> *Lightning*, *PrefBar* and *BetterPriva

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: > Exalm wrote: >>> >> They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review > > So how about > ? > > Regards! > How ironic... an add-on to fix the add-on manage

Re: SeaMonkey from Ubuntuzilla

On 09/10/2015 06:06 AM, Francois LE COAT wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Petr Voralek writes: >> Hello! >> >>On Thursday, 10.09.2015 12:25(+0200) *Francois Le Coat* wrote, and I >> quote (in part): >> >>> The problem is that I don't know how to get the 2.33.1 version >>> of SeaMonkey, getting it fro

Re: Maximize this vid?

On 9/10/2015 3:17 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Can anyone figure out how to play this video in full screen, or > nearly-full screen? I really hate peering through that keyhole. > > > The FS button at lower left seems not to work, ev

Re: SeaMonkey 2.35 and extensions

On 09/10/2015 12:19 PM, sean wrote: > On 09/10/2015 12:10 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 09/10/2015 09:21 AM, sean wrote: >>> On 09/05/2015 06:39 AM, Wolf wrote: >>>> Thanks a lot to the SeaMonkey Project team for their hard work to keep >>>> SeaMonkey ali

Re: SeaMonkey from Ubuntuzilla

On 9/10/2015 1:20 PM, Francois LE COAT wrote: > Hi, > > NoOp writes: >> Francois LE COAT wrote: >>> Petr Voralek writes: >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 10.09.2015 12:25(+0200) *Francois Le Coat* wrote, and I >>>>

Re: gstreamer1.0: Re: SeaMonkey Linux unofficial-nightlies (including L10n)

On 06/14/2014 01:39 PM, »Q« wrote: > In , > Hartmut Figge wrote: > >> »Q«: >> >> >As long as you don't add USE="gstreamer", >> >> I do know nothing about gstreamer but tried that with pv on world. Not >> too much rebuilding, so i added it to make.conf and

Re: gstreamer1.0: Re: SeaMonkey Linux unofficial-nightlies (including L10n)

On 9/11/2015 6:47 AM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 09/11/2015 o 04:34 AM, NoOp pisze: >> >> Update: Sept 10, 2015 >> >> And still nothing in Firefox 40.x or SeaMonkey 2.35, 2.38, or 2.40. (...) > > Starting from today I did switch my GTK3 builds to gstreamer 1.0

Re: gstreamer1.0: Re: SeaMonkey Linux unofficial-nightlies (including L10n)

On 09/11/2015 06:47 AM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 09/11/2015 o 04:34 AM, NoOp pisze: >> >> Update: Sept 10, 2015 >> >> And still nothing in Firefox 40.x or SeaMonkey 2.35, 2.38, or 2.40. (...) > > Starting from today I did switch my GTK3 builds to g

Re: Expired cert for inline update

On 09/11/2015 11:36 AM, Philip Chee wrote: > On 11/09/2015 22:54, Mason83 wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> (I know I can download the installer manually and update using that.) >> >> Does anyone one know why the inline update process is failing? >> When I select "Check for Updates..." I get this e

Re: Expired cert for inline update

On 09/11/2015 07:54 AM, Mason83 wrote: > Hello everyone, > > (I know I can download the installer manually and update using that.) > > Does anyone one know why the inline update process is failing? > When I select "Check for Updates..." I get this error box: > > Update failed > > "Server certif

Re: Expired cert for inline update

On 9/14/2015 11:24 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Can someone please remind me how to return to the nice popup that gives >> you the "This connection is untrusted" instead of: >> >> >> www.seamonkey-project.org uses

Re: Expired cert for inline update

On 9/14/2015 6:23 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 9/14/2015 11:24 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >>> Can someone please remind me how to return to the nice popup that gives >>> you the "This connection is untrusted" instead of: >>&

Re: Something trying to trick SeaMonkey?

On 9/24/2015 12:37 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> Jay O'Brien wrote: >> >>> I have 5 computers running Windows 7 and SeaMonkey 2.33.1. My wife >>> and I each use one as our primary mail and browsing computer, the >>> other three are used primarily to display our cameras, and

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38 released

On 9/27/2015 1:36 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Greetings, > > The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38! > > For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.38, see the What's > New in SeaMonkey 2.38 section of the Release Notes [2], which also > contain a list o

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38 released

On 9/28/2015 6:03 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 9/27/2015 1:36 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38! >> >> For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.38, see the What's &

Re: Emojicons support?

On 10/4/2015 5:28 AM, Ant wrote: > Hello. > > When will SeaMonkey support emojicons like in e-mails since I am getting > more of them not showing up correctly. > > Thank you in advance. :) > Do you have the fonts necessary to view them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji#Implementation Foll

Re: What is that ? : Blocked for your graphics card because of unresolved driver issues.

On 10/4/2015 11:10 AM, Ray_Net wrote: > I see that useful informations can be find using about:support . > I look at this and I see this text: > Direct2D EnabledBlocked for your graphics card because of unresolved > driver issues. > > It's me blocking that because I had crashes when playing w

Re: Emojicons support?

On 10/4/2015 4:14 PM, Ant wrote: >>> When will SeaMonkey support emojicons like in e-mails since I am getting >>> more of them not showing up correctly. >> >> Do you have the fonts necessary to view them? >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji#Implementation > > Hmm. I guess none for Windows XP

Re: Mail > Compose > Photographs

On 10/6/2015 6:32 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> HilsB wrote: >>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ron Lesan wrote: > *Butting in 'cause I have the same problem --- and I don't* > *understand the explanation --- 99% of what?* Read the first t

Re: Mail > Compose > Photographs

On 10/06/2015 03:55 PM, HilsB wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 10/6/2015 6:32 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: >>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>> HilsB wrote: >>>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>>> Ron Lesan wrote: >>>&g

Re: Emojicons support?

Ant wrote: When will SeaMonkey support emojicons like in e-mails since I am getting more of them not showing up correctly. Do you have the fonts necessary to view them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji#Implementation Hmm. I guess none for Windows XP SP3. :( For WinXP You can add Symbola_

[linux 64bit No Updates Found] Re: SeaMonkey 2.39 released

On 11/8/2015 7:40 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey >> 2.39! >> >> For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.39b1, see the What's >> New in SeaMonkey 2.39 section of the Release Notes [2],

Re: [linux 64bit No Updates Found] Re: SeaMonkey 2.39 released

On 11/22/2015 12:11 PM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.whosay.nee wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 11/8/2015 7:40 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: >>> Edmund Wong wrote: >>>> Greetings, >>>> >>>> The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaM

Re: [linux 64bit No Updates Found] Re: SeaMonkey 2.39 released

On 11/23/2015 10:06 PM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.whosay.nee wrote: > WaltS48 wrote: >> On 11/23/2015 05:41 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> On 11/22/2015 12:11 PM, >>> sean.nat...@invalid.knights.whosay.nee >>> wrote: >>>> NoOp wrote: >>>>> On

Re: [linux 64bit No Updates Found] Re: SeaMonkey 2.39 released

On 11/24/2015 6:10 PM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 11/24/2015 08:27 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 11/23/2015 10:06 PM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.whosay.nee wrote: >>> WaltS48 wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2015 05:41 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>>> On 11/22/2015 12:11 PM, >>>

(Linux 64) SeaMonkey 2.40 Menu Corruption

In SM 2.40 (Linux64) I have started to get menu box screen corruption - both Browser and Mail menus). If I scroll up and down the menu box quickly with the mouse menu items dissapear or turn black - see screenshot at: User

Re: (Linux 64) SeaMonkey 2.40 Menu Corruption - disregard

On 4/5/2016 7:03 PM, NoOp wrote: > In SM 2.40 (Linux64) I have started to get menu box screen corruption - > both Browser and Mail menus). If I scroll up and down the menu box > quickly with the mouse menu items dissapear or turn black - see > screenshot at: > > <http://s15.

Re: (Linux 64) SeaMonkey 2.40 Menu Corruption - disregard

On 4/5/2016 7:25 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: > NoOp wrote on 04/06/2016 10:08 AM: >> On 4/5/2016 7:03 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> In SM 2.40 (Linux64) I have started to get menu box screen corruption - >>> both Browser and Mail menus). If I scroll up and down the menu box

Re: (Linux 64) SeaMonkey 2.40 Menu Corruption

On 4/5/2016 7:28 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > NoOp composed on 2016-04-05 19:03 (UTC-0700): > >> In SM 2.40 (Linux64) I have started to get menu box screen corruption - >> both Browser and Mail menus). If I scroll up and down the menu box >> quickly with the mouse menu items

Re: (Linux 64) SeaMonkey 2.40 Menu Corruption

On 04/06/2016 09:35 AM, A Williams wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> In SM 2.40 (Linux64) I have started to get menu box screen corruption - >> both Browser and Mail menus). If I scroll up and down the menu box >> quickly with the mouse menu items dissapear or turn black - see >>

Re: Safe Browsing

On 06/22/2016 04:14 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > If I select [Edit > Preferences > Privacy & Security] on the SeaMonkey > menu bar, the Privacy & Security pane has a section named "Safe > Browsing". This section has two checkboxes, one for sites with malware > and viruses and one for phishing. > >

Lightning Add-on no longer available for SeaMonkey?

Is Lightning no longer available for SeaMonkey 2.40? Went to update/install on a system and ran into "Not available for SeaMOnkey 2.40" see: What's up with that? Does every new SeaMonkey 2.40 user now need to go to:

Lightning Add-on no longer available for SeaMonkey?

Is Lightning no longer available for SeaMonkey 2.40? Went to update/install on a system and ran into "Not available for SeaMOnkey 2.40" see: What's up with that? Does every new SeaMonkey 2.40 user now need to go to:

Re: Lightning Add-on no longer available for SeaMonkey?

On 7/11/2016 8:04 PM, John Duncan wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> Is Lightning no longer available for SeaMonkey 2.40? Went to >> update/install on a system and ran into "Not available for SeaMOnkey >> 2.40" see: >> <https://s32.postimg.org/drk42c9h1/Ligh

Re: Seamonkey needs improvement

On 8/16/2016 1:18 PM, Mozillian wrote: > I use Seamonkey for newsgroups only. > The left most column is a icon column (left of Subject). > > How about putting up a tooltip over the different icons so we can do not > have to remember what the heck a particular icon means. > > It is simple to do s

Re: Seamonkey To Browser

On 8/17/2016 5:07 PM, James wrote: > How do I make Seamonkey open say Firefox when I click on a URL ? > I do not like Seamonkey as a browser. > Firefox is my default but Seamonkey ignores that. > Maybe: h will work for

Re: MS erodes choice

On 9/1/2016 2:57 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: > With new Windows 10 Anniversary Update MS Edge is being foisted upon us. > You can set SeaMonkey as your default browser, but secure url shortcuts > ALWAYS open in Edge! See attachment where you can see other installed > browsers for HTTPS protocol b

Re: Video doesn't play

On 9/3/2016 7:37 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: > > > This video doesn't play in SeaMonkey but does in every other browser I > tried. Ideas? > > WFM: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.

Re: Video doesn't play

On 04/09/16 18:02, NoOp wrote: > On 9/3/2016 7:37 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >> <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-08-31/what-amazon-s-prime-air-means-for-fedex-and-ups> >> >> This video doesn't play in SeaMonkey but does in every other browser I >> t

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 message body not displayed

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 Build identifier: 20160120202951 (but also occurs in SeaMonkey/2.40 linux and Windows&linux Thunderbird) When reading messages with Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, the actual text is not d

Re: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 message body not displayed

On 9/8/2016 4:33 PM, NoOp wrote: > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 > Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 > Build identifier: 20160120202951 > (but also occurs in SeaMonkey/2.40 linux and Windows&linux Thunderbird) > > When reading messages w

Re: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 message body not displayed

On 9/8/2016 6:58 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 9/8/2016 4:33 PM, NoOp wrote: >> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 >> Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 >> Build identifier: 20160120202951 >> (but also occurs in SeaMonkey/2.40 linux and Windows&

[Enigmail Extension Issue] Re: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 message body not displayed

On 9/8/2016 10:04 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 9/8/2016 6:58 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 9/8/2016 4:33 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 >>> Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 >>> Build identifier: 20160120202951 >>

Re: Seamonkey release?

On 9/9/2016 7:23 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200): > >> In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian if you >> are on Windows or Linux. His releases are build from the original >> sources and bug reports against them are accept

Re: Mail dl Challenges in SM V 2.40.....

On 9/13/2016 8:50 AM, SamuelS wrote: > The POP3 servicer (pop.mail.yahoo.com) does not support UIDL or XTND > XLST This is generally a Yahoo problem: Give it a few hours or a day and s

Re: Problem with XFINITY home page search bar

On 9/14/2016 9:02 PM, Zeb Carter wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> Zeb Carter wrote: >> >>> I provide support for an older couple. Several years ago, I had them >>> start using Seamonkey. >>> >>> Recently, they have not been able to use the search bar on the XFINITY >>> home page. The only thing

Re: Problem with XFINITY home page search bar

On 9/15/2016 4:10 AM, Zeb Carter wrote: > Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> Zeb Carter wrote: >> >>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Zeb Carter wrote: > I provide support for an older couple. Several years ago, I had them > start using Seamonkey. > > Recently, they have not been able t

Re: Problem with XFINITY home page search bar

On 9/15/2016 11:36 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 9/15/2016 4:10 AM, Zeb Carter wrote: >>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>> Zeb Carter wrote: >>>> >>>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>>> Zeb Carter wrote: >

Re: Problem with XFINITY home page search bar

On 9/16/2016 4:34 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> >> http://www.xfinity.com redirects to my.xfinity.com - cleared cache, >> cookies, history, et al. >> > I cleared cache and went to http://www.xfinity.com does not re-direct! > Don

Re: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 message body not displayed

On 9/8/2016 4:33 PM, NoOp wrote: > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 > Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 > Build identifier: 20160120202951 > (but also occurs in SeaMonkey/2.40 linux and Windows&linux Thunderbird) > > When reading messages w

Re: Adblock Plus Opens Door to Advertising For a Price

On 9/19/2016 7:57 AM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 9/19/2016 6:58 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: >> The NY Times article of 9/19/2016 titled: >> >> "Adblock Plus, Created to Protect Users From Ads, Instead Opens the Door" >> >> states that "In 2011, Adblock Plus was altered and became a tool that, >> in

Re: Adblock Plus Opens Door to Advertising For a Price

On 9/19/2016 6:58 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > The NY Times article of 9/19/2016 titled: > > "Adblock Plus, Created to Protect Users From Ads, Instead Opens the Door" > > states that "In 2011, Adblock Plus was altered and became a tool that, > instead of blocking bad ads, allowed ads it deemed 'a

Re: SeaMonkey no longer minimizes to the taskbar correctly

On 9/20/2016 5:47 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 20/09/2016 2:53 AM, Desiree wrote: >> When did it become a feature? > > Assuming we're talking about the tabs preview feature > (browser.taskbar.previews.enable), it was implemented in SeaMonkey 1.1 > (Jan 2007). > Perhaps she is talking about 'Imp

Re: SM 32/64 bits ?

On 9/29/2016 6:59 PM, djc wrote: > Lee wrote: >> On 9/29/16, sean wrote: >>> Ray_Net wrote on 09/28/2016 01:38 PM: Hello, Tell me ... I will install soon the latest SM official release version of SM. (2.40) It is a 32 bits applications - Could you confirm ? >>> >>> I see a

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

On 10/3/2016 10:33 AM, Ant wrote: > Hello. > > Does anyone else have a Vimeo.com account and not able to see subscribed > Flash videos on their https://vimeo.com/home home page? I reported this > issue over the weekend: https://vimeo.com/forums/help/topic:285433 and > they said SeaMonkey web br

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

On 10/3/2016 12:34 PM, Ant wrote: >>> Does anyone else have a Vimeo.com account and not able to see subscribed >>> Flash videos on their https://vimeo.com/home home page? I reported this >>> issue over the weekend: https://vimeo.com/forums/help/topic:285433 and >>> they said SeaMonkey web browsers

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

NoOp wrote: On 10/3/2016 12:34 PM, Ant wrote: Does anyone else have a Vimeo.com account and not able to see subscribed Flash videos on their https://vimeo.com/home home page? I reported this issue over the weekend: https://vimeo.com/forums/help/topic:285433 and they said SeaMonkey web browsers

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

On 10/3/2016 1:21 PM, Ant wrote: > On 10/3/2016 12:59 PM, NoOp wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >>> On 10/3/2016 12:34 PM, Ant wrote: >>>>>> Does anyone else have a Vimeo.com account and not able to see >>>>>> subscribed >>>>>> Flash

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

On 10/03/2016 02:01 PM, Ant wrote: > On 10/3/2016 1:59 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 10/3/2016 1:21 PM, Ant wrote: >>> On 10/3/2016 12:59 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>> NoOp wrote: >>>>> On 10/3/2016 12:34 PM, Ant wrote: >>>>>>>> Does anyone

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

On 10/3/2016 4:32 PM, Ant wrote: > On 10/3/2016 2:34 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 10/03/2016 02:01 PM, Ant wrote: >>> On 10/3/2016 1:59 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>> On 10/3/2016 1:21 PM, Ant wrote: >>>>> On 10/3/2016 12:59 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>&g

Re: Vimeo.com's logged home page doesn't show videos correctly.

NoOp wrote: ... I finally got SM2.45 installed on WinXPPro, and with a clean test profile the video plays. So I reckon that you'd need to work down (maybe 2.43?) to 2.40 to see where it finally dies. WinXP is a PITA for me as it's still on VMWare and slow (plus have to disable Avast

Re: Resetting Newsgroup read messages.

On 10/5/2016 5:55 AM, Daniel wrote: > I seem to recall that, somewhere in my SM profile, there is a file for > my UseNet news server, which records which news groups I have subscribed > to on that news server and which messages I have read with-in each of > those news groups. > > Could someone

Re: Resetting Newsgroup read messages.

On 10/5/2016 11:46 PM, Daniel wrote: > On 6/10/2016 8:58 AM, NoOp wrote: >> On 10/5/2016 5:55 AM, Daniel wrote: >>> I seem to recall that, somewhere in my SM profile, there is a file for >>> my UseNet news server, which records which news groups I have subscribed >

Re: Importing Old Mail with .slt Suffix

On 9/29/2016 7:56 AM, David Hume wrote: > I am trying to import some old mail, from around the year 2000. I am not > sure what client I was using then, maybe mozilla communicator, or > netscape. The mail is in folders with a .slt suffix, like xx.slt. I > tried to create a profile called xx

Re: Replacement for addons (SM 2.46)

On 10/8/2016 9:15 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:44:13 +0200, Yamo': >> Petr Voralek a écrit le 05/10/2016 12:43 : >> >>> Mnenhy https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/mnenhy/ >> >> For Mnenhy, there is an unofficial patch : >> >>

Re: Replacement for addons (SM 2.46)

On 10/09/2016 06:59 AM, Petr Voralek wrote: >Hello! > > On Saturday, 08.10.2016 18:15(+0200) *Stanimir Stamenkov* wrote, and I > quote (in part): > >> mnenhy-0.8.6.1.2-stanio.xpi > > Thank you for your help, very appreciate it! > > Unfortunately I have in this (and in the previous) ve

2.46 updates?

I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those that are still running 2.40). Here is what I get for the upgraded 2.46: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonk

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/11/2016 4:42 PM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote: >> I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the >> system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those >> that are still running 2.40). Here is what I get

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/11/2016 07:23 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 10/11/2016 4:42 PM, WaltS48 wrote: >> On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the >>> system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those >

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/12/2016 5:23 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 11/10/2016 10:23 PM, NoOp wrote: >>> On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>> I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the >>>> system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/12/2016 9:51 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 10/12/2016 5:23 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: >> On 11/10/2016 10:23 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>> On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote: >>>>> I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the >>>>> sys

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/11/2016 9:30 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my > unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) > Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545 (Default Classic > Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my n

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/12/2016 01:05 PM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 10/12/2016 10:47 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> Ray_Net wrote: >>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 12/10/2016 15:09: Lee wrote: > On 10/12/16, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> on some (few) w

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/13/2016 2:42 AM, Ray_Net wrote: > NoOp wrote on 13/10/2016 00:44: ... >>> >> I can't reproduce in linux 2.46: >> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 >> Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 >> Build identifier: 20160922144825 &g

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/13/2016 12:42 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > Mark Bourne wrote: >> Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my >>> unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) >>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze: >> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9 >> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory: >> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/un

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze: >> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9 >> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory: >> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/un

Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze: >> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9 >> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory: >> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/un

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/14/2016 01:07 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > NoOp wrote: >>> Mark Bourne wrote: >>>> Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents becaus

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/13/2016 12:42 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > Mark Bourne wrote: >> Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my >>> unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) >>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

On 10/15/2016 5:12 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 10/13/2016 12:42 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: >>> Mark Bourne wrote: >>>> Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>

Re: Adobe updated FLASH for Linux...

On 10/15/2016 12:07 AM, Ant wrote: > On 10/14/2016 12:22 PM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote: >> Good News for or those of us who run Seamonkey on Linux there are now >> updated flash plugins for any of your Mozilla based browsers... >> >> I updated late last night with instructions in my pep

Re: Adobe updated FLASH for Linux...

On 10/15/2016 04:53 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 10/15/2016 12:07 AM, Ant wrote: >> On 10/14/2016 12:22 PM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote: >>> Good News for or those of us who run Seamonkey on Linux there are now >>> updated flash plugins for any of your Mozilla based br

[Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: > W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze: >> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9 >> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory: >> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/un

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

On 10/19/2016 01:22 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 19/10/2016 1:00 AM, WaltS48 wrote: >> On 10/18/2016 09:23 AM, Daniel wrote: ... >>> I just went to my SM browser, clicked Help->Check for updates and was >>> told there were no updates for my WIN7 WOW64 SM!! >> >> What version exac

Re: Is >2.40 for Linux available anywhere built with GTK2?

On 10/17/2016 11:19 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274 creates the need. > Felix, try: http://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-linux64/ Includes: ~/seamonkey/seamonkey/gtk2$ file libmozgtk.so libmozgtk.s

Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?

On 10/22/2016 11:48 PM, Ant wrote: > On 1/8/2014 10:44 AM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following: >>> On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following: On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed: >> I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it be

<    11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   >