Hello Task Control,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:58:14 -0400 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, February 12, 2003, 11:58:14 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Task Control wrote:
> Hi tbdev arroba thebat.dutaint.com
> in http://fyberger.tripod.com/pacspam/pacspam.htm is now avalaible
> the second
Stefan-
Thursday, February 13, 2003, 5:43:31 PM, you wrote:
ST> I am going to publish plug-in API in a couple of weeks. It just needs
ST> time and some calm, you know. :-) As the current workload is quite
ST> high and a bit stressful, the problem to find proper time is real...
I'm a bit familiar
Hi Mark,
MW> Or, in this case, a lack of *any* real documentation. Stefan - I
MW> take it that the API we're working with here is also going to be
MW> valid when the fabled 2.0 release finally rears its head?
I am going to publish plug-in API in a couple of weeks. It just needs
time and some calm
Petr-
Thursday, February 13, 2003, 4:59:33 PM, you wrote:
PP> As I stated, my comments are based on the AV API.
And excellent educated guesses, too.
>> It's actually the other way around... return 0 if there's no
>> configuration option, return non-zero if you *do* provide one.
PP> If is it so,
Hi,
As I stated, my comments are based on the AV API.
>>> function TBP_NeedConfig: Integer; stdcall;
PP>> return 0 if you provide a configuration dialog.
> It's actually the other way around... return 0 if there's no
> configuration option, return non-zero if you *do* provide one.
If is it so,
Petr-
Just a couple of corrections here...
Thursday, February 13, 2003, 1:17:55 PM, you wrote:
>> function TBP_NeedConfig: Integer; stdcall;
PP> return 0 if you provide a configuration dialog.
It's actually the other way around... return 0 if there's no
configuration option, return non-zero if
Hello tbdev.
Excuse me for so "mass mailing" today...
...is it possible to use the regular expression machine from
Tne Bat! in a custom antispam filter? It is sweet dream to use it
and I think it would be quite bad if it is necessary to include a
second regular expression machine ve
Hi,
> ..Can anybody explain me the context and interface for the functions
> in a plugin (well, I try to guess something myself):
Based on the AV interface (and I think TBP API won't be much different):
> function TBP_GetStatus: Integer; stdcall;
should return status of you plugin, 0 is OK, -3
Hello Stefan,
On Thursday, 13. February 2003, at 15:03:55 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
TM>> Anyway what is the aim and object using 2 plugin, if both do the
TM>> same or one is better.
> Different plug-ins can be used for different methods of checking. Some
> use statistical approach, some analyze me
Hi Thomas,
TM> I think because TB! gets informations from 2 different Sources.
Because TB! may gather information from many sources, the option
exists so you can choose the score :-)
TM> Anyway what is the aim and object using 2 plugin, if both do the
TM> same or one is better.
Different plug-
Hello TBDEV.
..Can anybody explain me the context and interface for the functions
in a plugin (well, I try to guess something myself):
function TBP_GetStatus: Integer; stdcall;
function TBP_NeedConfig: Integer; stdcall;
function TBP_NeedCOM: Integer; stdcall;
function TBP_Setup: Integer; stdcall;
Hello Stefan,
On Thursday, 13. February 2003, at 14:07:43 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
TM>> If you have both plugins installed for example the filtering from the
TM>> sender email (PacSpam Plugin) is not working in my case. TB! doesn't
TM>> know which scores it should take from which plugin.
> Why d
Hi Thomas,
TM> If you have both plugins installed for example the filtering from the
TM> sender email (PacSpam Plugin) is not working in my case. TB! doesn't
TM> know which scores it should take from which plugin.
Why doesn't it know if you can select which score should be used
(min,max,average)
Hi@all,
Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003 um 05:58 schriebst Du (oder zumindest teilweise):
> please test it, and send my your comments.
Great Plugin. But the attachements are not scanned (complete or uncomplete string).
Sorry for my bad english :)
Yours sincerely
Mit freundlichen Grüss
Hello Stefan,
On Thursday, 13. February 2003, at 11:18:33 [GMT -0500] you wrote:
TM>> You can't use both Plugin that won't work. Tested!! The function of
TM>> each Plugin are eliminating each against the other Plugin.
> Please explain what you mean :-)
If you have both plugins installed for ex
Dear Gerd,
GE> I understood it the following way: If both Plugins are installed, then
GE> Plugin A does not work because of Plugin B; Plugin B does not work because
GE> of Plugin A.
This is why I am asking. Do they bite each other? :-)
--
Sincerely,
Stefanmailto:[EM
Hello Stefan Tanurkov !
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:18:33 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 13.02.2003, 17:18 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Stefan Tanurkov)
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
TM>> You can't use both Plugin that won't work. Tested!! The function of
TM>> each Pl
Hello Thomas,
TM> You can't use both Plugin that won't work. Tested!! The function of
TM> each Plugin are eliminating each against the other Plugin.
Please explain what you mean :-)
--
Sincerely,
Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...It was the best of lines,
it wa
Dear tbdev at thebat.dutaint.com:
En relación a lo que Task en su momento posteó:
TC> in http://fyberger.tripod.com/pacspam/pacspam.htm is now avalaible
TC> the second public version of pacspam
and the update for the second version
and russian and german files.
--
Best Regards,
Task Control
Hello Leif,
On Thursday, 13. February 2003, at 06:21:52 [GMT -0700] you wrote:
> Darn, that's kinda what I thought it was supposed to be. Ok then
> lemme ask this. I've got both PACSPAM and NetVicious added and active
> in the anti-spam plugins.
You can't use both Plugin that won't work. Tested
Hi Task,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, at 10:05:30 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:05 AM where
I live) you wrote:
TC> if the mails says: "a wonderfull world!"
TC> the complete string "full" returns FALSE
TC> the incomplete string "full" returns TRUE
TC> the complete string "world" returns TRUE
TC> the complete st
Estimados seguidores del tbdev arroba thebat.dutaint.com:
En relación a lo que Leif en su momento posteó:
LG> Ok, I'm playing with it. Could you maybe explain a little about the
LG> complete strings vs. the incomplete strings? It's missed a couple of
LG> SPAM that I thought it should have gotte
22 matches
Mail list logo
