RE: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging option

2002-02-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> The only problem with jk2 is that it's only available >> for Apache 2.0, port to Apache 1.3 should be conducted... > >True. My focus was on cleaning up the code, and it >was much easier with a single server. I don't think >updating the other servers is very difficult. Hope so, maybe Apache 1.3

RE: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging option

2002-02-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> OK, I think that explains it. >> >> So mod_jk 2.0 and Ajp14 are still in development, and it >> may be a while before they are finished. > >> > >What is the status of mod_jk (2) 1.2 and Ajp 14? > >My opinion: > >Jk2 supports all the features from jk1 ( and some more ). >There are probably so

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>>Renaming mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c doesn't help too >>much, but it's ok ( and will be more consistent). > >mod_jk2.c is mandatory for : > > > ... handle jk2 directives ... > > >That's why renaming is mandatory > Urg, sorry for all these mandatory words ;? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> >If you talk about the module name - I think that's >> >absolutely required. >> >> mv mod_jk.c mod_jk2.c, ok ? > >Change build.xml to generate mod_jk2.so, and >the internal name ( so LoadModule will

RE: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging option

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>OK, I think that explains it. > >So mod_jk 2.0 and Ajp14 are still in development, and it >may be a while before they are finished. Depends on how many people will help, a known story ;) >What about mod_jk 1.2, when will that be ready for production use? Ready to use, I'm using it since TC 4.0

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>>That requires making both versions 'coexist', and >>that requires renaming the module and the conflicting >>directives. > >Done, I'll modify mod_jk.c to mod_jk2.c ASAP Well I'll rename and update build files this nigth (CET) and will commit tomorrow morning (CET) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging option

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> >> These features could be added to mod_jk 1.2.0 (native) >> and 2.0.0 (native2) in jakarta-tomcat-connectors. >> > >What is the status of mod_jk (2) 1.2 and Ajp 14? mod_jk 1.2 is the original mod_jk from TC 3.3, with little cleanup. m

RE: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging option

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> I suggest a fifth log level be added called "request". >> (debug, info, request, error, emerg) >> >> This log level would log each request with the following >possible info, >> what info is logged could be controlled by an new config option >> JkLogRequestFormat. > >+1, I don't know if I'll h

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Ok, I'd like to have mod_jk 2.x with Apache 1.3 and >> may be with/without APR... > >I start to have doubts about supporting mod_jk2 without >APR - we should keep doing that at least until APR is >officially released and until we have a working >mod_jk2 for IIS/etc using APR. After that we can

RE: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging option

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
These features could be added to mod_jk 1.2.0 (native) and 2.0.0 (native2) in jakarta-tomcat-connectors. The mod_jk in TC 3.3 is now feature freezed - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> BTW: Did there is plan to port mod_jk/2.0.0 to Apache 1.3 >> and IIS/iPlanet/Domino ? > >Of course, but my primary goal is to clean the code and >refactor it - and making it work well with Apache2.0. > >It should be reasonably easy to write the adapters >for the other ( few days for each

RE: Release servlet-api-4

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Get jakarta-servletapi-4-src.tar.gz in http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0/src/ yes, it should be also copied in 4.0.2 release (ASAP) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk.c

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
There is still a problem with Jk2Worker directive (arg) I'm working on it - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original M

RE: Content-length checking in mod_jk

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Seems a good idea ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Philippe Van Der Gucht [mailto:[EM

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>-Original Message- >From: GOMEZ Henri >Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:57 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments > > >Oups miss to include diff ;) > >- >Henri Gomez ___

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Oups miss to include diff ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 jk2_renaming2.zip Description: jk2_renaming2.zip -- To unsub

RE: jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> [Wed Feb 20 00:19:28 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.28 (Unix) >mod_ssl/3.0a0 OpenSSL/0.9.6b DAV/2 mod_jk/1.2.0 mod_jk/1.2.0 >configured -- resuming normal operations >mod_jk/2.0.0 sounds better. > ok, so let's call it mod_jk/2.0.0 >> 3) To have both installed you should rename mod_jk.so from >

RE: [Daemon] New commons component

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
It's very easy at least in Unix world to have tomcat run as a basic user : Attached is the wrapper code (tomcat4) I use in TC 4.0.2 RPMS which replace catalina.sh dtomcat4 is a modified version of catalina.sh Ditto for jasper4 and djasper4 I'm unsure it's very usefull to have Tomcat 4.0 start

jk2 renaming - need revue and comments

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Ouf, finished the renaming of jk2 (native2) Some remarks : 1) I choose to rename ALL JK directive since there are just too many which are common in JK (SSL, LOG, DATE...) ... AP_INIT_TAKE1( "Jk2WorkersFile", jk2_set1, "workerFile", RSRC_CONF, "the name of a worker file f

RE: [Daemon] New commons component

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Well, of course the process would have to be started as root >and the setuid to a >non-root user happens at the start of the process. Then, the >JNI calls allow you >to invoke setuid to switch back to the "saved uid" which is >root (since that is >the uid of the parent process). The only issue

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:01 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ? > > >On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> So JkMount in Jk2 will point to NOP ? > >No, it'll be commented out ( as long

jk2 renaming

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Work is still in progress for the renaming of jk2 (native2) calls and vars to jk2_. Should be achieved tomorrow or on Thursday :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9D

RE: [Daemon] New commons component

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I saw there is provisions in commons-sandbox daemon for Interception of Signals. Did there is plan to add this feature to Tomcat 3.3.1/4.0.2 as it will be a real bonus for site admins ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY :

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-19 Thread GOMEZ Henri
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:36 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ? > > >On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2 >> and in gene

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Any objection to see JkMount renamed to Jk2Mount in mod_jk2 and in general all Directive subject to collisions with the original mod_jk... The both could be installed at the same time ... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [4.1] Service

2002-02-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Well, the Java code looks very similar to me. So the native code could >easily be ported to j-t-s. >It's just that this code is 100% Tomcat-dependency free. So >since it's some >generic capability other projects could want, I proposed to >move it to the >commons, instead of leaving it as a hidd

RE: Jk2 logging

2002-02-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>A quick proposal ( vote ? ): I would like to start using >commons-logging >in jk2. Right now it has println() style, but beeing able to benefit >from the fine control that log4j ( and other loggers ) provides >would help a lot. > >If nobody oposes, I will check in a current build of commons-lo

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> No change in CVS tree, just in source to avoid conflict >> between mod_jk(s) even if one is a jk_module and the >> other jk2_module >> >> Rigth now, I'll wait for JTC developpers 'green ligth' to >> do the changes in JTC native2 ONLY :) > >Green light from me. It's an excelent idea. > >N

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2 >> and jk2_module ? > >+1 if you talk about the binary. -0 if you talk about directory/file >names. No only source/binary, without touching anything in CVS layout. >> It will be need to rename all non static references, >> variables functio

[RPMANN] Tomcat 3.3.1-b1/4.0.2 updated & connectors created

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi, A quick note to say that the Tomcat 3.3.1-b1 and Tomcat 4.0.2 have been upgraded to RPM release 2 TC 3.3.1-B1 http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/ TC 4.0.2 + CONNECTORS http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/ The newly

RE: Java home autodiscovery add-on

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Christopher, Did you take a look at my scripts ? tomcat3 starter : #!/bin/sh # # Wrapper script for Tomcat, to be sure it will allways # be run with correct user profile (tomcat by default) # # derived from stuff in tomcat.init # # Gomez Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Keith Irwin &

RE: Java home autodiscovery add-on

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>In Tomcat 4.0.2 and later, the above code would, I believe, >fit into the >bin/setclasspath.sh script. This script, which already checks that your >$JAVA_HOME contains a java, javac, and jdb command, would extend that >functionality. BTW, setclasspath.sh is source by all the >executable Unix sc

RE: Java home autodiscovery add-on

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> What about adding this part in tomcat.sh (TC 3.3) and >> catalina.sh/jasper.sh to help them discover JAVA_HOME on >> at least Linux systems ? >> > > If someone forgets to set JAVA_HOME and has multiple JDK's >installed, they could get a suprise. I suspect most non-beginners >would rather see a

RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>-Original Message- >From: Jarecsni János [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:02 PM >To: Tomcat-Dev >Subject: jakarta-tomcat-connectors > > >Hi, > >I'd like to build TC40x. Where can I download >jakarata-tomcat-connectors? >The building.txt says one should downlo

RE: Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>If we consider native2 as a remplacement for the native of >mod_jk, no. That is >just a new version. >If you thing of easy testing may be... I have libjk.so from >native and mod_jk.so >from native2 and I stop/start Apache for testing both. The idea is that native2 will replace more or less qui

RE: Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>JXTA holds puretls and cryptix jars on jxta.org - so it shouldn't be a >problem on jakarta. > >Incidently, tls is not ssl, although there are many similarities. > >Just one question - are tls socket factories available for tomcat? You means TLSSocket instead of SSLSocket ? -- To unsubscribe, e-

RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Nice... But the tarballs should be redone, should n't they? >Then how to know that a 4.0.2 tarballs (connectors) is a good one? >I would have retagged jakarta-tomcat-connectors as >tomcat_402_01 and will >rebuild the tarballs as jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.2-01-src.* > >Any comments? It seems

Retry: PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache ????

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
e to JSSE - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: GOMEZ Henri >Sent: Wednesday, Februar

Rename jK2 to mod_jk2 ?

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
What about renaming native2 (jk2) in JTC to mod_jk2 and jk2_module ? It will allow us to install both modules at the same times and test original mod_jk and new mod_jk. It will be need to rename all non static references, variables functions, but I could do that, by suffixing with jk2_ : And t

Java home autodiscovery add-on

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
What about adding this part in tomcat.sh (TC 3.3) and catalina.sh/jasper.sh to help them discover JAVA_HOME on at least Linux systems ? +if [ -z "$JAVA_HOME" ]; then +# Search for java in PATH +JAVA=`which java` +if [ -z "$JAVA" ] ; then +JAVA_BINDIR=`dirname ${JAVA}` +JAVA_H

How to APR for JTC ? WAS: Native Connector Builds - When?

2002-02-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I've done a RPM for tomcat-connectors which include : mod_jk for Apache 1.3 mod_jk for Apache 2.0 mod_jk2 for Apache 2.0 I still can't build mod_webapp since the APR_DIR/APR_VARS are mandatory and I want/need to use instead APR_INCLUDE and APR_LIBS. Today you have 2 choices to have APR : 1)

RE: Tomcat 3.3.1 Beta 1 Released

2002-02-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
RPMs are also available : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1-b1/rpms/ Take a look at the information on how to use PureTLS, the OSS alternative to JSSE, which use Cryptix as security provider. May be updated in Tomcat Doc also, BTW: What about PureTLS on jakarta ?

RE: RES: [ANNOUCEMENT] Tomcat 4.0.2 Final released

2002-02-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Might be worth forwarding it to tomcat-dev (the guy sent to >announcements) Yep ;) >> Are not the RELEASE-NOTES updated? See following secition of >known problems: >> >> "The WARP connector for Tomcat 4.0 does not support load >balancing at this >> time." >> >> and >> >> "The AJP connecto

PureTLS/Cryptix RPM at Apache - WAS: Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM available

2002-02-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : > >The new RPM packaging looks much cleaner, and this time it should be >compliant with the official standard, right ? Yes, and I hope to see other jakarta/xml projects use these kind of packaging. BTW, openjmx RPM is ready, and also puretls, cryptix, cryptix-

RE: Native Connector problems

2002-02-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>One of the last changes on the connector ( the secret ) >introduced a bug, >when worker_cache is enabled. The secret will not be initialized, and >that may creates all kind of serious problems. Could you detail the problem ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addition

Tomcat 4.0.2 Final RPM available

2002-02-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/ But read the following before rushing : Tomcat 4.0.2 in light mode need : servletapi 2.3, regexp 1.2 and xerces 1.x, that are for some compiled (servletapi), present in source

Re: Tomcat 4.0.2 - Startup fails after moving xerces.xml from /common/lib to /server/lib

2002-02-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> I am using xerces 2.0.0 in one of my webapps so I need to move xerces.jar >> out of /common/lib and into /server/lib. This works just fine with >>4.0.2-b2. >> With 4.0.2 If I keep xerces.jar in /common/lib and use xerces.jar 1.4.3 in >> my web app everything starts up just fine. But if I move x

RE: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>The build doesn't require that, unless you use the "full.dist" >option (which >forces building everything, to prevent the release manager >from releasing >incomplete builds ;-)). > >JNDI is the only API you mentioned that is required (but it's >included in >JDK 1.3+, and you dont need the JAR)

RE: [4.0.2] [4.1] [PROPOSAL] Binaries packaging

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> For the ZIP/TGZ packaging: >> >> A) Full JDK 1.4: This includes everything, except the >libraries which are >> already included in the JDK (including the JAXP XML parser). I'd like to use Xerces 2.0, will it be in JDK 1.4 ? >> B) Light JDK 1.4: This incluides a bare bones Tomcat >distributi

RE: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>As discussed yesterday, the binaries will include a minimal >distribution >designed to be run on JDK 1.4. I miss the discussion of yesterday, sorry. Did it means that the build won't require jndi/jdbcext/javamail/jaf that caused me so many headaches in RPM packaging ? > >[ ] +1 - I support thi

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>There's a lot of power in what the task can do. >Here's a very >simple one that replaces the string "@port@" with the port number >specified by the "port" property: > > > > > > > > >In your template server.xml, you'd have a element >like this: > > > >Now, you just run "an

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I'm wondering whether we really need to build it in to Tomcat itself, >though. Can't you accomplish the same thing by using a little >Ant script >and run a or task? All this would require >is packaging >ant.jar along with Tomcat, or requiring users that need the facility to >download Ant th

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to >> specify -D= in Tomcat's startup. If it does, >> I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using >> parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml >> >> >> >> and included >> >> -Dhttp.port=8080 >> >> in the startup

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>It appears, for example, that the only thing you can override about a >connector is which port it's on. What happens if you want to override, >say, the maximum number of connections that your connector will accept >(the "maxProcessors" parameter on Tomcat 4's HttpConnector)? Right +1 for you he

RE: Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I don't know if the Eclipse configuration allows you to >specify -D= in Tomcat's startup. Yes you could set any VM and commandline args. >If it does, >I think a lot of this can be done in Tomcat 3.3.1 using >parameter substitution. I have used in server.xml > > > >and included > >-Dht

Tomcat 3.3 and 4.x tuning via command line

2002-02-07 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, You should all know that there is a very good Tomcat 3.3/4.0 plugin for the OSS IDE eclipse (www.eclipse.org), available at http://www.sysdeo.com/eclipse/. This plugin allow eclipse developper to launch Tomcat from the IDE, stop, restart and configure many parameters like tomcat_home.

RE: [PATCH] RETRY: Tomcat 4.0 Docs SSL-Howto

2002-02-05 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Seems good to me and should be applied also to Tomcat 3.3 SSL HOWTO :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Mess

Security in Tomcat Webapps - WAS: Tomcat 4 / mod_webapp RPMs available...

2002-02-05 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I send a copy to tomcat-dev since it's an important issue >Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. The distributions you have >provided via jakarta have been very beneficial to us and our >project. We >are grateful so much work has gone into building RPM's. Thanks ;) >> Warning, the RPM g

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt

2002-02-04 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> +5958 Wrong mod_jk.conf for path pattern >Easy enough to fix. The only question is if we want to change only >${Server}Config, or do we want to change the mod_jk behavior >so that the two >statements: >JkMount /myApp/foobar/* ajp13 > and >JkMount /myApp/foobar* ajp13 >are the same

RE: [PATCH] RETRY: Tomcat 4.0 Docs SSL-Howto

2002-02-04 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> If there are any further questions or comments - just hit "reply"... > >I like it - If noone complains I will try to commit it - > >> I just ask pedro to send me a plain copy, so let me take at look at ;) PS: Christopher and Eric should take a look also ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: Tomcat 4 / mod_webapp RPMs available...

2002-02-04 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>We've been customizing the src rpm's available at: > >http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4. >0.1/rpms/ > >and the mod_webapp rpm at: > >http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4. >0.2-b2/rpms/ > >to produce RPM's that our team feels are stable an log

RE: Apache/Tomcat/mod_jk growing TIME_WAIT counts

2002-01-31 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>They were on the http/https connections. So the problem as nothing to do with mod_jk or tomcat but on your OS settings. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Apache/Tomcat/mod_jk growing TIME_WAIT counts

2002-01-31 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I notice that I have a growing number of processes that are >left in a "w" >state according to server-status. I check using netstat and >see that there >are sockets hanging out in a TIME_WAIT state. These will >hang out for who >knows how long but I have some that are days old (when apache

RE: TC 3.3.3 with Apache stack space error

2002-01-31 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi Ray > >After some testing, I have made some observations that might be worth >something, or maybe not... > >I installed Redhat 7.2 w/tomcat3.3a-2. I used all RPMS to do this >(including the tomcat-mod-3.3-1 rpm.) I got the stack space >error. So, >I installed a redhat 7.1, same exact tomca

Tomcat 4 as a plugin in Eclipse IDE project

2002-01-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools/msg6.html ==> "We are in the process of introducing Tomcat into the Eclipse builds ... org.eclipse.tomcat plugin. The 20021010 nightly build is the first build containing it, and at this point we still have some build errors to sort through

RE: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Because that's what the "Redistribution" paragraph of the >license that you >> had to click through says you can do and not do. (See why >it's a good >> idea to actually *read* these things? :-) >Craig, you've still not answered precisely to my question. >Please explain us >if what we are

RE: Cocoon 2 Dumps Tomcat 4.1 on Apache1.3.22 SSL

2002-01-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
May I recommand you to switch to IBM SDK 1.3 which is quick and stable under Linux on kernel 2.2 and 2.4. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904

RE: Tools for Building Web Services

2002-01-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be >interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version >1.0ea1) that >was just released by Sun: > > http://java.sun.com/webservices > >The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2 >(with schem

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/utilC2B.java

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Maybe we should we create a org.apache.jtc.util package ? Or >org.apache.commons.tomcat ? jtc util should be used by TC 3.3 and 4.0 ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Pass in jk1

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I have a patch that allow mod_jk to send a 'secret', the same >way as ajp12 >works. It seems completely safe and backward compatible. The >code to check >the secret on java side is also trivial and unlikely to create any >problems. > >I can check this in in 2-3 days ( I'm in NYC now, not sure I

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6068] New: - AJP13 "bad read", IOException

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Upgrade to Tomcat 4.0.2-B2 for example, the problem is fixed. And in TC 4.0.2-B2 you'll gain load-balancing support ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53

RE: Tools for Building Web Services

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>>* JavaServer PagesTM Standard Tag Library ("JSTL") 1.0 EA 3 >> >> => ??? >> > >http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/standard-doc/intro.html > >:o) Good another piece of stuff in OSS land :) Thanks for the info, -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comm

RE: Tools for Building Web Services

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>If your interest in Tomcat is for developing Web Services, you will be >interested in the Java Web Services Developer Pack (version >1.0ea1) that >was just released by Sun: > > http://java.sun.com/webservices > >The Java WSDP includes early releases of base XML technology: JAXP 1.2 >(with schem

RE: Ant2

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Costin >P.S. I can volunteer to write the Makefiles, since soon this may be the >cleanest way to build tomcat... I hope it's a joke ?) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6056] New: - RPM Installation needs to be sorted out

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG >RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT >. >ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND >INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade JspInterceptor.java

2002-01-28 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Thanks Costin, iSeries developpers and users are happy to see you fix that damnt HP-UX bugs :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 8

RE: [VOTE] New Committer: Manveen Kaur

2002-01-26 Thread GOMEZ Henri
+1 Welcome on board. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Patrick Luby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

compiling latest webapp for TC 4.0.2b2

2002-01-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I could build webapp for Apache 1.3 on my Redhat 7.2 box but build for Apache 2.0 failed : My Linux is using a recent libtool 1.4 ... BTW: what is the version number for this release of webapp ? make[1]: Entering directory `/root/webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402' make[1]: Entering directory "li

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf DateTool.java

2002-01-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Thanks Bojan, I introduced these 2 bugs ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Javabinaries uploaded

2002-01-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> I'd like to clarify. I could have activation, javamail, jdbc-ext, >> jndi, jta, which are Sun products, included in a Tomcat tarball >> but couldn't have them included in a separate tarball ? >> > >Yes. And couldn't they be included in the application source tarball ? It's unclear in the lice

Major problem with Sun External Jar : RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> I've got a little problems with all the jars that are >> mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri. >> >> tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional. >> >> Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of >> them in a single tarball and put it on the download

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp Ajp13.java

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
> > total_read = readN(in, b, H_SIZE, len); > - > -if (total_read <= 0) { > + > +// it's ok to have read 0 bytes when len=0 -- this means > +// the end of the stream has been reached. > +if (total_read < 0) { > logge

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/tomcat40 Worker40.java

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
That's why jtc tag 4.0.2 b2 didn't build when you only have jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2-b2. Question : - Should we retag jtc 4.0.2-b2 including these patches or should I patch my tarball for jtc tagged 4.0.2-b2 to compile jtc with just TC 4.0.2-B2 on path ? Regards BTW: Did the jtc tagged tarba

RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I've got a little problems with all the jars that are mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri. tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional. Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of them in a single tarball and put it on the download area ? For now I

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/lib tomcat-ajp.jar tomcat-util.jar

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Bravo :) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >

RE: Native2: proposed interface change

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick >answer :-) >it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry >between the >java and c code, which is definitely good :) Yes, and you got my +1 also :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addit

RE: jk tags

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>For the C side, I'm working on JNI worker as a channel - that >will resolve >some of the current problems in jni ( performance, i18n, etc) and will >make the jni channel available in 4.0 too. But we still have >to update the >other server connectors, decide what we want to do about >config, et

RE: iSeries (AS/400) unusual JDK layout problem

2002-01-23 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Our iSeries are using now latest JDK 1.3.1 and the strange layout is still here :( /QIBM/ProdData/Java400/jdk13 The patch is really needed ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fing

RE: IPv6 question

2002-01-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I saw last e-mails concerning IPv6 and Tomcat in this place in >March. So >is it all clear? > >I have installed Tomcat 4.0.1 on RedHat (kernel 2.4.14) and tried to >connect to Tomcat using IPv6. Unfortunately, I got the 400 HTTP error >Bad Request returned by Tomcat. >The form of URL wan analo

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Plan

2002-01-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
> Not but I'm liking to try tomcat . > It's a very beautiful servlet implementation . Only commiters could vote on release plan ;) BTW : we need strong testers and fine bug reports -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Plan

2002-01-22 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Faraj are you commiter ? - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Faraj Meir [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Plan

2002-01-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Tomcat 3.3.1 Release Plan Ballot: > > [X] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help > [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help > [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan > [ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my >reason is: -- To unsu

iSeries (AS/400) unusual JDK layout problem

2002-01-21 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi to all, I've got a little problem with our AS/400 since they didn't respect the general layout for JDK 1.2/1.3 where java.home is xxx/jre or xxx/sdk and where tools.jar live in xxx/lib Sus Tomcat 3.3 couldn't find the needed tools.jar for JSP compilation Choices : - Add code in tomcat to m

RE: Alternate JMX implementation

2002-01-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Here is a quick build.xml for 1.0b1 since the one from CVS didn't works with 1.0b1 tarball (normal) Regards. - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC

RE: Alternate JMX implementation

2002-01-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Bravo. Consider also the JSSE alternative, http://www.rtfm.com/puretls/ from Eric Rescorla, which should be commiter by now (Craig ?) puretls is BSD Style and use Cryptix which is also BSD - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP K

Tomcat 3.3a RPMs updated

2002-01-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2 to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths. http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

2002-01-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of >the week (with >the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot: > > >[ ] +1 Make the release >[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help >[ ] -0 Bad idea >[ ] -1 No, because: > > > > > +1 since you'll add the load-balancing stuff

RE: [PATCH] JvmRoute changes w/attachments

2002-01-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Couldn't we have an automatic jvmRoute generated from misc entropy if the entry is not present in server.xml ? for example just the server hostname or ip address ? Adding the hostname/adress should be fine for the majority of case where only one JVM will be make run TC 4.x by system. Or may be

RE: jk2 problems with libapr.so

2002-01-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>I am playing with jk2 and I have noted that the loadNative() >in AprImpl fails: >+++ >java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: >/home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/l >ibapr.so: >/home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/l >ibapr.so: >undefined symbol: crypt >

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Constants.java Http11Connector.java InternalOutputBuffer.java

2002-01-15 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi Remy, A little late reply but : >> Hi Remy, >> >> What's the final goal for Coyote ? >> >> ;) > >- It should be faster than the current HTTP/1.1 processor >- It should address the HTTP/1.1 items marked as later in bugzilla >- It should be maintainable >- It should be easily testable >- It use

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >