I'm disappointed in this response that suggests having a discussion
about leadership off-list. This is not a closed process, just because
people aren't vocal does not mean they aren't interested.
A team is a group of people with a common understanding of their aims.
We had a meeting to achieve a
Onno Benschop wrote:
I'm disappointed in this response that suggests having a discussion
about leadership off-list. This is not a closed process, just because
people aren't vocal does not mean they aren't interested.
A team is a group of people with a common understanding of their aims.
We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:02:05 +0800
Onno Benschop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
How many others will see this thread, shake their head and go
elsewhere with their energy?
And is there some rule that says that a few of us cannot get together
I just completed a little reorganisation of the Agenda pages structure,
that is, the place the pages live in the wiki - it involved several
renames and edits. In case I made any horrible mistakes, here's a record
of what I did to the wiki:
* added meeting minutes for previous meeting
*
On 13/06/08 15:17, John Botscharow wrote:
And is there some rule that says that a few of us cannot get together
off the list and jointly prepare something concrete, well-thought out.
and positive to bring to the list when it is ready rather than
indulging in all the negativism that has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:30:26 +0800
Onno Benschop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/06/08 15:17, John Botscharow wrote:
And is there some rule that says that a few of us cannot get
together off the list and jointly prepare something concrete,
Hi all,
It's about two weeks that I'm on this mailinglist. I don't want to and
can't judge about the debate that is going on. For me, it's just clear
that I'll turn away if things do not change to more soon.
I joined this list because I wanted to help with marketing. I don't mind
if there is
Onno Benschop wrote:
On 13/06/08 15:17, John Botscharow wrote:
And is there some rule that says that a few of us cannot get together
off the list and jointly prepare something concrete, well-thought out.
and positive to bring to the list when it is ready rather than
indulging in all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:57:40 +0200
Simon Schneebeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It's about two weeks that I'm on this mailinglist. I don't want to
and can't judge about the debate that is going on. For me, it's just
clear that I'll turn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:07:26 -0500
John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I knew how to set up a new list, I would do it. If someone here
will explain where to go to do so and anything I need to know about
the mechanics of setting up a
John Botscharow a écrit :
I think Simon may have hit on the best solution. See his Stop it post.
I'm sorry to say, but all these comments about sinister motives for
off-list discussions strikes me as a bit paranoid. What about any
private messages on IRC? Are they off limits too? For all the
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:33 AM, John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:07:26 -0500
John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I knew how to set up a new list, I would do it. If someone here
will explain where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:38:29 +0200
Pierre Vorhagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone not interested in strategy/structure discussions, please
feel free to ignore this message. I. for one, will not be offended.
For those who are, please continue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:53:16 -0300
Cody A.W. Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:33 AM, John Botscharow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:07:26 -0500
I didn't intend to post anything more on this subject but the harsh tone in
the mail below means that I will have to explain myself:
2008/6/13 Onno Benschop [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm disappointed in this response that suggests having a discussion
about leadership off-list. This is not a closed
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:22 AM, John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
snip
Hello John,
I am currently the only active administrator (Corey and Jenda are
both busy with real life as far as I know). snip
A question, Cody, for you
Just a quick note to clear up one central misconception:
There is no one single way in which all FOSS projects work. Some people here
are trying to spread that mantra but that is in my opinion a myth. There are
tens of thousands of FOSS projects out there which are organized in totally
different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tord,
Thank you for clarifying that for us all. Being relatively new here, I
was actually beginning to believe the myth myself, hard as it was to
try and swallow.
And for the sake of honesty and openness, duplication, or as I like to
refer to it -
I'm sorry but the people who think a couple of emails off-list to help
keep the noise down are against some zealot-like notion of FLOSS is
simply astounding.
And honestly I'm not surprised. So many people around here want to whine
and talk but never do anything. Immediately jump to the negative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There goes someone we can ill afford to lose. Cory, you will be missed,
and I promise to give you a call. I won't hit you up because, for my
generation at least. that has sexual connotations, and frankly, you're
not my type. LOL
Pax vobiscum. Cory!
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:11 AM, John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tord,
Thank you for clarifying that for us all. Being relatively new here, I
was actually beginning to believe the myth myself, hard as it was to
try and swallow.
And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:45:47 -0300
Cody A.W. Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:11 AM, John Botscharow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tord,
Thank you for clarifying
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:20 AM, John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:45:47 -0300
Cody A.W. Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:11 AM, John Botscharow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM, John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:34:20 -0300
Cody A.W. Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read every post thus far.
Whew, then I don't need to bore everyone by repeating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I made the following changes to the Resources page under the
Information heading: I added a link to a new sub-page of the
Resources page. The link is entitled Marketing Articles which is a
table of contents to marketing articles that I feel are useful
All,
I think enough has been said about what we all think on the matter and we
stand on the precipice of doing nothing, or doing something.
I'm one for progress.
I think the best course of action is to try out something new and to see how
it plays out. I agree with Onno that whatever is done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:28:05 -0300
Cody A.W. Somerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM, John Botscharow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:34:20 -0300
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John V.,
I am not sure that a new team within this team is the solution. I am
concerned that this solution will only compound the problems, not fix
them. I could be wrong, but I will need to be convinced :-)
There are other options that need to be
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:24 PM, John Botscharow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you go to the Marketing Team/Toolbox/Wiki page here
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MarketingTeam/Toolbox/Wiki
and then click on Support--General it takes you to Massachusetts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:37:56 +0200
Søren Bredlund Caspersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:24 PM, John Botscharow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you go to the Marketing
Hi All,
I do not like to make a fuss, so I will keep this brief. I am
unsubscribing from this list. I have been a subscriber for more than a
year, but the recent noise and almost troll like behaviour
[intentional or not] has worn a little too thin for my tastes. IMHO, I
think some of the more
The Launchpad is now up and running. Mailing list is in process.
Please feel free to sign up and join!
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-marketing
--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Hello,
This is the first time I am writing such a long mail only because its
the last. Yeah, I am leaving this list too.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read every post thus far.
[snip]
For example, John, someone (I can't remember who) was
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:56 PM, John Vilsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Launchpad is now up and running. Mailing list is in process.
An LP mailing list? Then see
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/launchpad-users/2008-April/003610.html
nick
--
http://boredandblogging.com
--
34 matches
Mail list logo
