On 2012-04-19 16:44:48 +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello,
> This team has been existing for as long as Ubuntu has been around and
> one thing we've been doing since the early days is: being there for new
> contributors and bringing them into the fold. In my mind this is (among
> many others of co
On 2011-02-27 17:31:03 +0100, Horvath Andras wrote:
Hello Andras,
> Please include the latest version of my aaphoto package from Debian
> (0.41) into the upcoming Natty (0.40 currently).
>
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/natty/aaphoto
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/aaphoto
>
> This is
On 2010-10-20 20:44:07 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> bhav...@bhavani-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy pkgbinarymangler
> pkgbinarymangler:
> Installed: 77
> Candidate: 77
This looks like you installed it in your system and not the pbuilder
chroot. Login into your pbuilder (pbuilder-dist natty l
On 2010-10-20 11:16:29 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> when I tested out the package on my updated pbuilder it built fine
> [relevant part of the log attached] but it failed on the buildd
The check that made the build fail is done by the package
"pkgbinarymangler" which is installed on the build
On 2010-09-20 21:46:38 -0400, Kevin McKinney wrote:
> checking what language compliance flags to pass to the C compiler...
> checking for GNOME_DEVICE_MANAGER... configure: error: Package
> requirements (libgnome-2.0 >= 2.14.0
>libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.14.0
>gtk+-2.0 >= 2.6.0
>hal >= 0.5.10)
On 2010-06-18 13:00:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Kubuntu-dev only covers main.
That explains my mistake. So the kubuntu package set only covers the KDE
subset from main and allows Kubuntu developers to upload those without
being a core-dev. Any KDE packages that are in universe aren't part
On 2010-06-18 09:07:36 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I looked it up and it was
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ChristianMangold/MOTUDeveloperApplication
>
> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/04/27/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
>
> Specifically, he was told by a DMB member that MOTU is for generalists and he
On 2010-06-17 16:58:12 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> "Michael Bienia" wrote:
>
> >On 2010-06-17 15:28:26 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> This is pretty close to the UDS discussion. A number of Kubuntu people
> >> wanted a separate package
On 2010-06-17 15:28:26 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is pretty close to the UDS discussion. A number of Kubuntu people
> wanted a separate package set because, specifically, of people who
> focused on these packages getting deferred from MOTU because the had
> worked too much on KDE stuff.
On 2010-06-17 08:17:04 -0400, Ralph Janke wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 02:52 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> >
> > This is not isolated to people working on KDE stuff. With the advent of
> > more and more package sets, people are more likely to get granted upload
> > privs to those rather than getting full MOT
On 2010-03-03 02:08:27 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Michael Bienia wrote:
> > On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> >> Michael Bienia wrote:
> >> > On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> >
> > [MOTU Leaders]
> > I fully und
On 2010-03-02 16:27:36 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 March 2010 00:06:49 Michael Bienia wrote:
>
> > > ii) Coordinate with all the other Ubuntu Developer Teams to set up a
> > > distribution-wide REVU Coordination team, with representatatives from
>
On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Michael Bienia wrote:
> > On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
[MOTU Leaders]
> My main rationale for retaining it was in hopes that new folk
> would step forward to lead various aspects of what we do and he
On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> A) Leadership
>
> We have historically been broadly without hierarchy, nominating
> and recognising some of our number as leaders (5) as a result of their
> continuing efforts in some area that directly improves the health of
> the team. On
Hello,
the regular second MC meeting won't happen this month as it falls on
December 24th (and we have *very* strong doubts to reach quorum on that
day :).
The dates for the next MC meetings are:
- Fri, December 11th 2009 7 UTC
- Fri, January 8th 2010 7 UTC
(after that following the regular sche
On 2009-12-07 13:53:59 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
First, thanks for providing this list.
> # packages that were part of Debian at some point:
> mirrordir
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mirrordir/+bug/484738
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modi
On 2009-11-30 23:10:43 +0100, Tim Michelsen wrote:
> >> What do I need to change in my control file in order to get only the
> >> Python 2.6 files installed on systems where 2.6 is the default Python
> >> version?
> >
> > Does it make the package that bigger that you don't want it? Do you have
> >
On 2009-11-30 00:44:45 +0100, Tim Michelsen wrote:
> Therefore, I pu the minimum python version in my control file:
>
> XS-Python-Version: >=2.5
>
> I am on Ubuntu Karmic.
> When installing the package generated with
> dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
> the system also installes the modules files for Py
On 2009-11-08 11:52:29 -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> I concur in removing mirrordir from the Ubuntu and Debian
> repositories.
Filed in Launchpad as bug #484738 (http://launchpad.net/bugs/484738)
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscrib
On 2009-10-28 10:50:24 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Is there a way we could speed up SRUs for the next week? As I
> understand it the current process requires uploading the package to
> Lucid before backporting the fix.
>
> Does this mean updates are going to be impossible until Lucid is
> avail
On 2009-10-16 10:37:10 -0400, Steven Harms wrote:
> Do not turn this into a debate about the merits of qmail, that is
> off-topic. You can see the debian report on inclusion here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510415
And here is the ITP bug for qmail:
http://bugs.debian.o
On 2009-09-20 08:36:11 +1000, William Grant wrote:
> It also appears that we now have three wishes for Launchpad Bugs. I've
> been asked to give both on Wednesday, so get any opinions in soon!
- Better support to see which Ubuntu releases are affected by a bug
(version support)
Currently it's
Hello,
I hope you are the right person for this as your name appears in the
changelog for the adobe-flashplugin package.
The adobe-flashplugin package that can be downloaded directly from
www.adobe.com lists the Ubuntu MOTU mailing list as Maintainer which is
clearly wrong and also causes confusi
On 2009-08-24 18:58:40 +0300, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 2009/8/24 Dmitry Baryshev :
> >
> > $ dpkg -l | grep adobe
> > ii adobe-flashplugin 10.0.22.87-1
> > Adobe Flash Player plugin version 10
> >
> > --
> > Regards, Krasu.
> >
>
> Hmm. it seems like this package is from C
On 2009-07-29 09:09:20 +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> Once the powerpc has cleared its build queue, I am happy to go through
> the powerpc FTBF list, and work out why packages didn't build, and try
> and get them buildable again. Note that main will largely be ok in
> this regard, but universe may n
On 2009-06-04 13:34:45 -0400, Jacob Peddicord wrote:
> I've been trying to figure this out for the past couple of days, but
> no matter what I use to build hardinfo 0.5c-1 (sync), it builds
> successfully on my pbuilder instance (yay). However, I'm getting
> failed build messages from Launchpad.
Y
On 2009-05-10 20:10:26 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> then wait for (or ping) the archive admins. They should automatically
> detect that gtkpod-aac is obsolete and remove it from the archive.
If there is an automatic process for it then it doesn't work
successfully always as I filed several rem
On 2009-03-01 12:03:17 +0100, Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote:
Hi,
> python-sqlite package is broken on Jaunty:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> python-sqlite: Depends: python (< 2.6) but 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 is to be
> installed
> E: Broken packages
>
> Is there a b
On 2009-02-27 15:01:48 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Am Friday 27 February 2009 14:10:40 schrieb Michael Bienia:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as I didn't see any offical announcement about it yet:
> >
> > The voting for the new MC members is open and ends 2009-03-12.
>
Hi,
as I didn't see any offical announcement about it yet:
The voting for the new MC members is open and ends 2009-03-12.
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/+polls
We have three nominees for three vacant places as the TB decided to
increase the MC to seven seats [0].
The nominees have also
On 2009-02-21 20:52:47 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> Oh, I didn't make it quite clear: I imagine that packages uploaded to
> the PPA would be the ones that passed reviewing with 2 advocates. So
> essentially, these package would be in a state ready for upload to
> Ubuntu's archive. I agre
On 2009-02-11 18:59:32 -0600, David Mashburn wrote:
> Dear WxWindows maintainer(s),
>
> What is the simplest way to get a compiled version of wxPython to run on
> the latest Ubuntu for testing? I am working on a modification of
> PyCrust and wanted to test some changes in the wxStyledTextControl
On 2008-12-17 09:02:31 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > Here's an example .muttrc file similar to what I use:
> >
> > http://bryceharrington.org/files/lp-mutt-colors
> >
> > When using mutt's threaded view, you can quickly spot "patterns", like a
> > series of emails ending in one green one usua
Hello,
I just want to announce that Michael Casadevall (NCommander) is now a
MOTU. The most of you will probably know him already, so an introduction
won't be necessary :)
Please give him a big welcoming hug!
Regards,
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
On 2008-11-05 16:30:19 -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Siegfried-Angel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jordan: The intention of this is not to let the list look better, but
> > to don't waste time reviewing the packages of those people who we have
> > already lost and
On 2008-11-04 15:15:09 -0200, David Faerman wrote:
Hi,
> i need, because my boss want use asterisk 1.4.21 in hardy but it is
> only for intrepid where i can find some info to backport it?
See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports for how to request
backports.
Regards,
Michael
--
On 2008-10-16 09:06:29 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Dear MOTU Council,
>
> please consider appoint Devid Antonio Filoni (d.filoni on LP) and
> Nicolas Valcarcel (nvalcarcel on LP) as new motu-sru members.
>
> Devid's application and advocates:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/200
On 2008-09-04 01:36:51 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Understood. When the remaining members return from vacation,
> could a proposed charter be prepared and presented at the following
> MOTU Meeting? Given the new decision process, it may be appropriate
> to send it with enough advance time th
On 2008-08-19 20:51:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > This leads me to the question: what the main point on becoming a MOTU?
> >> > - is it the next reward for Ubuntu members who work hard on improving
>
On 2008-08-19 16:38:43 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [ feel free to take it back to motu-council if you want ]
> >
> > On 2008-08-19 15:52:10 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PR
On 2008-08-04 15:09:44 +, barney holmes wrote:
Hello,
> I am reluctant to jump into compiling such a complex system unless I
> really have to. Are there plans to release the GEOS 3.0 library for
> Ubuntu ? If I know it's coming along then I can plan around this and
> do other things in the mea
On 2008-08-06 17:19:55 -0700, Emil Ong wrote:
Hi,
> There are a couple of hitches, though. We dual-license Resin as GPL
> and a closed source professional (upsell) version with a bit of extra
> code for added performance/clustering. We'd like to distribute the
> latter in the non-free repository
[ moving that part of the discussion to ubuntu-motu ]
On 2008-07-09 14:16:33 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> And with the Ubuntu Environment in general, giving out upload rights to
> known contributors, we are showing to us and them that we trust those
> people. I wonder if we still have this "you
On 2008-07-03 19:24:57 +1200, Kai-Cheung Leung wrote:
Hello,
> When I plan to upload my fixed packages (from the original sw-linux
> deb-based distribution that already has a .tar.gz file and a .dsc file but
> not .diff file),
That usually happens when the .tar.gz is not correctly named, so
dpkg-
On 2008-06-18 17:16:09 -0300, Florian Grandel wrote:
Hello,
> I am currently helping out in packaging JBoss AS for Debian. It's a
> first time experience for me so please do not expect me to know the
> Debian and/or Ubuntu processes very well.
Is it somehow related to the jbossas4 package in De
On 2008-06-01 04:44:55 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1]), but that might be
> subject
> to discussion.
As I had to go out and look after one ~motu-sru member to get my SRUs
ACKed, I'd like to hear from the remaining ~motu-sru members how many
new m
On 2008-05-31 22:22:18 +0200, Adna rim wrote:
> I'm very interested in this topic and the one who started the
> bug-report :) My ideas for this situation would be the following:
>
> 1.) mplayer without mencoder goes to universe and mencoder alone stays
> in multiverse (there is already a mencoder
On 2008-05-31 01:14:16 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> as overheard on #ubuntu-devel today, please don't use one bug with many
> different tasks for transitions. The problem with this is, that any
> subscriber of an affected package will get every mail for a change in that
> bug (in short: [he/she
On 2008-05-25 13:07:44 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Stefan Potyra wrote:
> > - motu-council*
> ...
> > [*]: There already is a policy. What is good, what is bad about it?
>
> Where? Couldn't find anything in the wiki.
I guess that would be
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/Delega
On 2008-04-29 22:47:53 +1200, Antonio Broughton wrote:
Hi,
> I am interested in providing more JBoss packages for Ubuntu.
>
> I have found there are some "library" packages, however, this does not
> offer a complete JBoss (AS?) package.
>
> I have started a wiki page at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/J
On 2008-04-17 10:25:27 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Priority 1a:
>
> I think our main focus should still be to fix
> Universe/Multiverse packages for the actual development
> release. That means, merging, syncing, fixing packages which we
> are importing from Debian or f
On 2008-04-18 01:48:20 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> I can see a whole lot of people submitting checkinstalled binaries, and
> then dh-make template packages as a "source", as an afterthought. Even
> checkinstalled packages built "somewhere". That's not so helpful.
I assume the idea is to uplo
On 2008-04-04 10:51:45 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> "MOTU" itself came from an internal joke from former times, but right
> now, the real team is name's "ubuntu-dev", and internally addressed as
> Ubuntu Universe Developers.
New MOTUs are added to the ~motu team. ~ubuntu-dev is "Ubuntu
Develo
On 2008-03-16 18:44:47 +, James Westby wrote:
Hello,
> I would appreciate it if an experienced person would
> offer to hang around and help me out when I can't answer
> a question.
As I have done some work on the FTBFS list during hardy,
I'll try to be around and help out.
Ping me on IRC if I
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
> paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
> checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS or ChangeLog (if
> t
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release that
> just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a bug in LP
> with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it fix released when the
> uplo
On 2008-01-30 16:52:36 +0100, Bjorn Heesakkers wrote:
> Op Wednesday 30 January 2008 15:06:18 schreef Michael Bienia:
> > The transmission backport for gutsy is currently partly published: amd64
> > has already 1.00-1~gutsy1 but i386 is still at 0.93.dfsg-2~gutsy1.
> >
> &g
On 2008-01-29 14:38:46 +0100, Bjorn Heesakkers wrote:
> De volgende pakketten hebben niet-voldane vereisten:
> transmission: Vereisten: transmission-cli (>= 0.93.dfsg-2~gutsy1) maar het
> zal niet geïnstalleerd worden
> Vereisten: transmission-gtk (>= 0.93.dfsg-2~gutsy1) maar het
On 2008-01-16 19:57:33 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Am Sonntag 13 Januar 2008 17:13:12 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
> > P.S.: Before starting, haskell-utils and haskell-devscripts need to be
> > synced from unstable, but I guess that this will happen very soon (bug
> > #182505 and bug #182522).
>
> Bot
On 2007-11-08 18:52:19 +0100, Christian Westgaard wrote:
> Any plans to include a uudeview-dev package into the ubuntu repo?
>
> klibido source requires uudeview.h
According to packages.ubuntu.com /usr/include/uudeview.h is included in
the libuu-dev package.
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
On 2007-11-02 14:00:53 -0400, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> I listen in on this list just to occasionally get these kinds of
> insights. I find it odd, though, that MOTU is more interested in
> reviewing and accepting bug fixes than in new packages. It seems to
> me that there are two kinds of packag
On 2007-10-31 12:37:28 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Hardy should have no Not Built from Source, Failed To Build From
> Source, or Outdated packages:
What should happen to packages which still depend on packages in the NBS
list? See e.g. sear now (stuck in 6 lib package transitions) and IIRC
FTBFS
On 2007-10-31 15:26:04 +1100, William Grant wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:37 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> > [snip]
> > In past releases, we have used multidistrotools (10) for this.
> > The last URL I had appears to be down: would anyone be willing to host
> > this?
>
> That was, IIRC, run
On 2007-10-28 20:25:35 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Welcome Søren and Michael! Maybe you could write a short introduction about
> you?
Sure.
My name is Michael Bienia (irc nick: geser) and I'm turning 28 soon.
I became a MOTU almost a year ago.
I hope to be a good replacement for t
On 2007-10-23 18:05:31 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2007-10-23 10:19:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > As promised when we decided to go ahead with uploads to gutsy-proposed
> > before
> > hardy was open, here is the list of uploads that need to go into Hardy to
On 2007-10-23 15:20:55 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> Michael, what in hell were you thinking?
I was contacted by GNUmed upstream about that problem with the
gnumed-client package in gutsy. I wanted to help them get the package
working again.
But I see now that the way I did it was wrong and apologi
v
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.12-0ubuntu1.1
Distribution: gutsy-proposed
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers
Changed-By: Michael Bienia
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
An updated version of gtk2hs is available in gutsy-proposed for testing.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Please provide feedback to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129050
The current version of gtk2hs i
An updated version of gnumed-client is available in gutsy-proposed for
testing.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Please provide feedback to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154136.
I got contacted by an u
On 2007-09-24 17:11:20 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Luke Yelavich wrote:
> > As it is, nobody has put anything concrete forward as a suggestion,
> > so I would like to propose Friday, October 5th, at 20:00UTC. I know
> > it doesn't suit those of us in the asia pacific/oceniania, but we
>
On 2007-09-21 23:11:51 +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> At the MOTU meeting which has just completed, those of us who were
> present were not able to come to a decision about the next meeting
> time/date. We agreed that it should be in two weeks from now, but
> couldn't agree on an exact time. Two tim
On 2007-09-02 15:57:57 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> who uploaded a package to debian with ubuntu motu list address?
Matthias Klose (doko) uploaded it and forgot to change back the
Maintainer field.
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscrib
On 2007-08-17 16:50:27 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> For simba, I did something like this in the simba.postinst:
>
> # Check if mysqlserver is running
> if [ -e "/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock" ]; then
> ...
> else
> echo "W: Database server does not appear to be running!"
> echo "W: Please
On 2007-08-11 11:54:13 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> I've just packaged tesseract-ocr-2.0 and uploaded it, but I get the
> message at the bottom of the mail. Is the problem that I imported my
> GPG key to Launchpad only yesterday and the REVU keyring hasn't yet
> been synced, or something else?
On 2007-07-26 13:15:00 +0200, Stephan Henningsen wrote:
> Could you please update the worker package with a recent version and
> compile it with UTF8 support? That would be splendid, as right now UTF8
> chars are displayed malformed, and I think this is the last program, that I
> use, that hasn
On 2007-07-15 17:45:37 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:20:16 +0200 Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >I don't know what the best solution for this but it should work for both
> >main and universe packages easily.
>
On 2007-07-15 07:37:12 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> As a result of this, I am now uncertain whether to prefer
> something as part of the package, or as a launchpad whiteboard.
> Personally, I believe my workflow would be simplified for notes within
> the package, but downloading source is a low
On 2007-06-27 04:57:58 -0500, Tom Marble wrote:
> The reason an SRU may still make sense here is that currently the
> version in feisty (0.59):
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&subword=1&version=feisty&release=all&keywords=netbeans&sourceid=mozilla-search
>
>
On 2007-06-27 11:50:53 +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
[ I'm guessing the context is an update of netbeans5.5 for feisty ]
> > * Does it mean that I have to create separate changelog
> > entry
> > for update? Now I have 5.5.1-2 for gutsy.
>
> Yes, maybe 5.5.1-2~proposed1 (For t
On 2007-06-02 12:05:31 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Debian php5 source package ships three binary packages which lie in
> Universe: php5-interbase, php5-imap and php5-mcrypt. They depend on
> packages present in Universe (firebird2-dev, libc-client-dev and
> libmcrypt-dev respectively), so they c
On 2007-06-14 18:10:07 +0200, Loïc Martin wrote:
> I can see new libxvidcore4 packages at
> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/x/xvidcore/
>
> However, they don't appear in Feisty's repositories, nor do they appear
> after a search in http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/libs/libxvidc
Hello,
A fixed version of vpnc is available for testing in feisty-proposed.
Please add
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ feisty-proposed universe
to your sources.list(5). Then, update and upgrade (or install) vpnc.
Please provide feedback to bug #93413:
vpnc dead peer detection disconnects
On 2007-03-13 12:29:36 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Couple of quick questions. Should we take the time to remove the
> binaries from the source packages for mod-bt and php-clamavlib?
Already done for mod-bt and php-clamavlib. Currently I going through the
remaining source packages providing ph
On 2007-02-22 08:03:55 +1100, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:15:28AM EST, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > However, there are currently 13 packages that still depend on php4
> > packages (like libapache2-mod-php4). If noone cares for them, they
> > will be removed along with php4, but a fe
On 2006-12-12 20:03:37 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> 2. proposal: Next Wednesday, 12/20/06, 22.00 UTC
Wednesday please
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
On 2006-11-12 11:24:38 +0100, Andreas Volz wrote:
> Ok, I looked into
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
>
> but found no virtual package for glut. So what is the exact name for
> the virtual glut package and how could I get a recent list?
Looking thro
On 2006-10-13 06:15:27 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 00:45 schrieb Kees Cook:
> > sope: build-dep conflicts:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >apache-dev: Depends: libdb4.4-dev but it is not going to be installed
> > This totally ba
87 matches
Mail list logo
