[vUDS Blueprint 13.10] Server support for 12.04.3/3.8 kernel

2013-04-30 Thread James Page
Hi List During the last 6 months, we shipped 12.04.2, the most recent point release for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. This included the new hardware enablement kernel from quantal (3.5) which is great; however this update (which was opt-in) broke quite a few DKMS packages which are popular with server u

Re: Server Support

2010-06-07 Thread Peter Matulis
On 06/02/2010 03:14 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > How about: > > Ubuntu Server development, discussion and support | For general (not > server specific) questions visit #ubuntu | Get involved: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/GettingInvolved | Be patient. Don't > ask to ask, just ask. | Doc

Re: Server Support

2010-06-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Thierry Carrez" wrote: >Mathias Gug wrote: >>> In my case, actually having those unanswered questions kind of prevent >>> me from using the channel for random development chat. I don't feel like >>> appearing as an insensitive developer that continues his work and jokes >>> with co-workers whi

Re: Server Support

2010-06-02 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mathias Gug wrote: >> In my case, actually having those unanswered questions kind of prevent >> me from using the channel for random development chat. I don't feel like >> appearing as an insensitive developer that continues his work and jokes >> with co-workers while people beg for help on the cha

Re: Server Support

2010-06-01 Thread Mathias Gug
velopment without (directly) appearing like a > careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When/if I have time to do server > support, I move to the other channel and answer questions. There is > value in having separated topics. > IMO the traffic in #ubuntu-server doesn't warran

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Jorge Armando Medina
Soren Hansen wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:54:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> One of the work items listed in: >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-maverick-community >> >> is now: >> >> + ubuntu-server IRC channel: both support and devel. Change the topic to

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Neal McBurnett
> > > >So I support the idea that having a separate support channel for -server > >would result in a more lively server development channel, where you > >could chat about development without (directly) appearing like a > >careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Nigel Jones
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: [snip] > > That said, I agree that support should go somewhere well defined, rather > than just being "removed from topic". I've no opinion on how best to > separate them: > > * #ubuntu-server = dev //

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
support the idea that having a separate support channel for -server >would result in a more lively server development channel, where you >could chat about development without (directly) appearing like a >careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When/if I have time to do server >support, I

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
ithout (directly) appearing like a careless bastard^H^H overworked person. When/if I have time to do server support, I move to the other channel and answer questions. There is value in having separated topics. That said, I agree that support should go somewhere well defined, rather than just

Re: Server Support

2010-05-27 Thread Soren Hansen
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:54:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > One of the work items listed in: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-maverick-community > > is now: > > + ubuntu-server IRC channel: both support and devel. Change the topic to > + remove Support. Oh, wow. I

Re: Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread Nigel Jones
t. > > > If we are going to drop support from the topic of #ubuntu-server, what is the > plan to support the server community on IRC?  In my experience server people > require a different kind of support than desktop users and so I don't think > tossing server support into #ub

Re: Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread Jim Tarvid
even then, some threads are beyond my cognitive ability. I presume the authors have some purpose in posting but the posts themselves defy comprehension. How about #ubuntu-server-panic for those times when a formerly working server is broken; #ubuntu-server-support for help in adding new feature

Re: Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread dxiri343
I second to that --Mensaje original-- De: Scott Kitterman Remitente:ubuntu-server-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com Para:ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com Asunto: Server Support Enviado: 25 May, 2010 20:54 One of the work items listed in: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server

Server Support

2010-05-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
support the server community on IRC? In my experience server people require a different kind of support than desktop users and so I don't think tossing server support into #ubuntu is the right answer. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubunt