>...
>
>Jeff Chan wrote:
>
>> Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
>>
>> This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
>> thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us
>> straighten him out, gently:
>>
>> http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/w
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 05:16, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > 1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below
>
> 2.0
>
> > points and gets through (even if we set required hits to 3 and 2 for
>
> certain
>
> > mailboxes).
>
> I assume you mean here that you have 1000 spam a week
Jeff Chan wrote:
Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us
straighten him out, gently:
http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Delbono wrote:
> I've found that recovering bayes berkeley db databases can be a
> very big chore and would suggest that you move to a proper SQL
> datbase (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite) as soon as possible.
> BerkeleyDB is horrible! Both in perfor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I see notes on using MySQL/PgSQL and other SQL database and
> migration from Berkeley DB to MySQL. I was wondering if anyone
> knows how to migrate to DAN's CDB from Berkeley DB for bayes DB. I
> like to use that (CDB) a
From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What I'm having trouble understanding is this: when SA learns from new
> messages, are the benefits of this learning applied system-wide? Eg, if
> 'steve' on scoop runs sa-learn, are the bayesian filters thus produced
> applied also when user 'trish' runs messag
From: "Chavdar Videff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Dear List,
>
> I know these are subject of the FAQ and the documentation, yet after I
read
> all of it I didn't get an answer to the following questions:
>
> 1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below
2.0
> points and gets
Sounds like with his attitude he'd be blacklisted here anyway.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
>
> This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
> thanks this guy paints
Chavdar Videff wrote:
Dear List,
I know these are subject of the FAQ and the documentation, yet after I read
all of it I didn't get an answer to the following questions:
1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below 2.0
points and gets through (even if we set requ
> >
m{https?://[^/\s]+?(? >
> >
> One of the amazing things about posting to lists is that shortly after
> posting I usually find the answer to the question. Well, I've now
> learned something about negative look-ahead assertions that I did not
Actually that is a negative lookBEHIND assertion that
Jeff Chan wrote:
Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us
straighten him out, gently:
http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_b
> 1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below
2.0
> points and gets through (even if we set required hits to 3 and 2 for
certain
> mailboxes).
I assume you mean here that you have 1000 spam a week leaking through? Or
do you mean that you have 1000 spam a week TOTAL a
At 09:38 PM 5/30/2005, Craig Jackson wrote:
Craig Jackson wrote:
m{https?://[^/\s]+?(?
This I copied from the Spamassassin test for odd ports. The logic is
similar. However I have never seen some of this notation. And of course
the test doesn't work -- too many false positives.
1) What do th
Craig Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Our small business never receives mail from top level domains other than
com,net,org,mil,edu,gov,and us -- except spam. Additionally, we never
receive email with links containing other level domains -- except spam.
The logic is that we are small and do no business outs
Hi,
Our small business never receives mail from top level domains other than
com,net,org,mil,edu,gov,and us -- except spam. Additionally, we never
receive email with links containing other level domains -- except spam.
The logic is that we are small and do no business outside our geographic
ar
Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention.
This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as
thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us
straighten him out, gently:
http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_blogs/
I gave it my
On Monday 30 May 2005 05:58 pm, Bruno Delbono wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 15:47:01 -0700, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem appears to be that database is corrupted. I renamed the old
> > ~/.spamassassin, ran my reporter script an all was well. Luckily I have
> > a
> > good 1000 o
Asif Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I see notes on using MySQL/PgSQL and other SQL database and migration
from Berkeley DB to MySQL. I was wondering if anyone knows how to
migrate to DAN's CDB from Berkeley DB for bayes DB. I like to use that (CDB) as
the
bayes DB.
Thanks for any help/suggestion/tip
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 07:18:31PM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> from Berkeley DB to MySQL. I was wondering if anyone knows how to
> migrate to DAN's CDB from Berkeley DB for bayes DB. I like to use that (CDB)
> as the
> bayes DB.
There's no native support for CDB, so you'd have to do up your own
Ba
On 5/27/05, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Steve Prior writes:
> > My domain geekster.com has been Joe jobbed for the last couple
> > of weeks. In spite of the fact that I responsibly created SPF
> > records for my domain, I am get
Hi All
I see notes on using MySQL/PgSQL and other SQL database and migration
from Berkeley DB to MySQL. I was wondering if anyone knows how to
migrate to DAN's CDB from Berkeley DB for bayes DB. I like to use that (CDB) as
the
bayes DB.
Thanks for any help/suggestion/tip
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key:
M>-Original Message-
M>From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M>Sent: 30 May 2005 04:00
M>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
M>Subject: cannot open bayes databases
M>
M>While running my sa-learn script I'm suddenly getting the below:
M>
M>debug: lock: 26313
M>created
M>/home/chris/.spamassa
On Mon, 30 May 2005 15:47:01 -0700, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem appears to be that database is corrupted. I renamed the old
~/.spamassassin, ran my reporter script an all was well. Luckily I have
a
good 1000 or so spams saved up, hams are another matter. Is there any
way
On Monday 30 May 2005 05:24 pm, Bruno Delbono wrote:
>
> Ah. It could be number of things - corrupt database, bad berkley db
> install, missing libdb_deadlock (usually libdb3/4_deadlock), permissions.
> I would suggest
>
> 1) Make sure that ~/.spamassassin is owned by you chris (both uid:gid)
> 2)
CC'g the list as you sent the message only to me.
On Mon, 30 May 2005 15:10:16 -0700, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 30 May 2005 11:05 am, Bruno Delbono wrote:
Chris wrote:
> No joy Martin. Tried both --sync and --force-expire. Anyone else
with
> ideas?
strace sa-learn --sync
Mike Jackson wrote:
I'm sure there are some PHP hackers who have much nicer graphs than I
do, but I found the easiest thing to do was to extract numbers from my
logs with some perl scripts and paste them into Excel. Management
likes Excel and it makes pretty charts. :)
It's not automated, but
I'm having trouble configuring spamassassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl
version 5.8.4. I'm runing Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary). I'm using Dovecot
version 0.99.13 and Postfix version 2.1.5-9. I also have Squirrelmail
version 1.4.4. All of this is installed and appears to be working
properly - exc
On Mon, 30 May 2005 13:40:44 -0700, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 30 May 2005 19:25, mouss wrote:
run SA from amavisd, and run sa-learn with the same uid as amavisd.
Okay, ignore my previous message. I'm working on getting amavisd to run
SA.
Currently, amavisd seems to be runni
On Monday 30 May 2005 19:25, mouss wrote:
> run SA from amavisd, and run sa-learn with the same uid as amavisd.
Okay, ignore my previous message. I'm working on getting amavisd to run SA.
Currently, amavisd seems to be running as user 'vscan' (UID 65). How do I run
sa-learn as this user and wher
Check out the files in /usr/share/spamassassin (or wherever they fall in
your install). All the rule definitions are in there; 'grep RULENAME
*.cf' is your friend.
This is probably a FAQ, but I bet it's asked more often by spammers than
by SA admins..
Pierre Thomson
BIC
-Original Messa
At 06:22 PM 5/29/2005, Jason Haar wrote:
I'm wondering if Microsoft's own anti-spam solution for Exchange "tags"
mail via headers (they call it "spam confidence level")? I can't see any
references to actual headers being added - they may not of course - it
could all be internal to Exchange.
In an older episode (Monday 30 May 2005 20:01), Ryan L. Sun wrote:
> HI,
>
> Where can I find SpamAssassin rules' meaning and examples?
> Some rules are easy to understand from its name, while others are not
> easy to figure out what's the rule stands for. If there are some
> examples for a specif
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:56:56AM -0700, Ryan L. Sun wrote:
> That's the config manual, which didn't explain much about rules' meaning.
> Any ideas?
You can look at the default rule files, they have descriptions for each rule.
Other than that, it's not really clear what you're looking for.
--
R
O' Reilly Regular Expressions book? :)
--
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
That's the config manual, which didn't explain much about rules' meaning.
Any ideas?
On 5/30/05, Craig Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan L. Sun wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > Where can I find SpamAssassin rules' meaning and examples?
> > Some rules are easy to understand from its name, while other
Looks like some particularly inept spammer is grabbing partial
Message-IDs from the headers of messages on this list and trying to send
email to them as though they were email addresses. Sad, really.
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
I've noticed recently in my MTA logs a growing trend of attempts t
Steven Stern said the following on 5/30/2005 12:11 PM:
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.
Interesting. For me, they
Ryan L. Sun wrote:
HI,
Where can I find SpamAssassin rules' meaning and examples?
Some rules are easy to understand from its name, while others are not
easy to figure out what's the rule stands for. If there are some
examples for a specific rule, that would be great.
Thank you.
man Mail::Spam
HI,
Where can I find SpamAssassin rules' meaning and examples?
Some rules are easy to understand from its name, while others are not
easy to figure out what's the rule stands for. If there are some
examples for a specific rule, that would be great.
Thank you.
Steve wrote:
I've been using SpamAssassin successfully for some time, but having recently
reconfigured my home network and could do with some help getting to grips
with how best to use SA.
I have a Linux box (scoop) running Fetchmail, Postfix & Qpopper acting as our
mail server. Mail is deliv
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.
Interesting. For me, they started May 28th at almost exactly noon
EDT.I'm alm
Steven Stern wrote:
I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.
Interesting. For me, they started May 28th at almost exactly noon
EDT.I'm almost tempted to let a coupl
I've been using SpamAssassin successfully for some time, but having recently
reconfigured my home network and could do with some help getting to grips
with how best to use SA.
I have a Linux box (scoop) running Fetchmail, Postfix & Qpopper acting as our
mail server. Mail is delivered into users
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
I've noticed recently in my MTA logs a growing trend of attempts to send
email to numbered email addresses, such as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have any ideas why spammers would be
Chris wrote:
No joy Martin. Tried both --sync and --force-expire. Anyone else with ideas?
strace sa-learn --sync and see what exactly is it doing
-Bruno
I've noticed recently in my MTA logs a growing trend of attempts to send
email to numbered email addresses, such as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have any ideas why spammers would be trying this particular tac
Chavdar Videff wrote:
Dear List,
I know these are subject of the FAQ and the documentation, yet after I read
all of it I didn't get an answer to the following questions:
1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below 2.0
points and gets through (even if we set requ
Matthew S. Cramer wrote:
If an email is from <> or then I check the mail for a
line that looks like /^Received.*one.of.our.ip.addresses/. If it
doesn't have the line, then I reject the mail with a 554 and "Bounced
message did not originate here."
I was intrigued by this idea and started loo
MC writes:
>
> Kirk D Bailey General Mismanager wrote:
> > I want to use spamassassin with sendmail. Maybe it's buried on the
> > website, but I am not finding instructions on how to use it with
> > sendmail MTA. Can anyone point me at the procedure to do this?
> >
>
> You could also go along th
Chavdar Videff wrote:
Dear List,
I know these are subject of the FAQ and the documentation, yet after I read
all of it I didn't get an answer to the following questions:
1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below 2.0
points and gets through (even if we set requ
Dear List,
I know these are subject of the FAQ and the documentation, yet after I read
all of it I didn't get an answer to the following questions:
1. At our site we get approx. 1000 spam a week. Most of it is rated below 2.0
points and gets through (even if we set required hits to 3 and 2 for
I'm sure there are some PHP hackers who have much nicer graphs than I do,
but I found the easiest thing to do was to extract numbers from my logs
with some perl scripts and paste them into Excel. Management likes Excel
and it makes pretty charts. :)
It's not automated, but it does have lots of
I'm sure there are some PHP hackers who have much nicer graphs than I
do, but I found the easiest thing to do was to extract numbers from my
logs with some perl scripts and paste them into Excel. Management likes
Excel and it makes pretty charts. :)
It's not automated, but it does have lots of
is there an 'easy' way to get a grpahical representation of how well SA
is doing??
preferably something flashy with lots of primary colours for the
managment elite??
if not i suppose i gotta start hackin rrdtool scripts or similar!!?
mnay thanks
Ronan
--
Regards
Ronan McGlue
Info.
On Monday 30 May 2005 05:02 am, martin smith wrote:
> M>-Original Message-
> M>From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> M>Sent: 30 May 2005 04:00
> M>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> M>Subject: cannot open bayes databases
> M>
> M>While running my sa-learn script I'm suddenly getting the
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You don't say what version you are using.
Sorry - 3.0
> In 3.0 there are plugins that can do this sort of thing, if
> you really want
> to. If you dig in the wiki, you will find a page with plugin
> contributions,
I'll look into them, thank you
You don't say what version you are using.
In 2.6x, you can't do this without changing core code - non-text attachments
are stripped before the rules can see them. One exception is the
"MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE" rule that can detect some attachment types. This
rule was deleted in 3.0.
In 3.0 there a
Spamassassin newby warning. Did read ::Conf manual and
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
How do you check for an attachment name or file type (excel in this case) ?
I resorted by using a rawbody meta rule, but that doesn't seem too right.
I didn't find the documentation for EvalTest
> is there a way to see how often a certain rule would
> match in a mail (besides the obvious
Unfortunately, no. Lots of us would like to see that, but there isn't any
way of doing that with standard rules.
Loren
Hi,
is there a way to see how often a certain rule would
match in a mail (besides the obvious
body /.*.* ad nauseum/
) ?
I sometimes stumble across patterns that might be
legit once or twice in a mail, but they appear
a lot more often than that...
Regs,
Sven
60 matches
Mail list logo
