Re: RelayChecker 0.3

You're right. Not necessary. Must have been something I had intended to use and use the SA debug output instead. I've taken it out of my sources. Wont be in the next release. Thanks! Steven Manross wrote: Am I missing something or is the use of Sys::Syslog not necessary? I can't find

Re: RelayChecker 0.3

The Doctor wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:06:53PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: The Doctor wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: New version of RelayChecker. http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar Changes: - It's now in a single tar file. Put

Re: RelayChecker 0.3

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:06:53PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: > The Doctor wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: > >>New version of RelayChecker. > >> > >>http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar > >> > >>Changes: > >> > >>- It's now in a single tar f

RE: RelayChecker 0.3

Am I missing something or is the use of Sys::Syslog not necessary? I can't find a compatible Win32 build.. Though I didn't look all that hard for it, as the module seems to work correctly without it (from my limited testing). Thanks, Steven > -Original Message- > From: John Rudd [mailto

Re: Is this a problem with 3.2.0pr?

On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote: Correct but before It use to be $body = join("\n", @$body); if ($self->are_more_high_bits_set ($body)) { return 1; } and now it's $body = join("\n", @$body); if ($pms->are_more_high_bits_set ($body)) { return 1

Re: Is this a problem with 3.2.0pr?

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:51:10PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote: > Where is EvalTests.pm now then? There is no EvalTests.pm in 3.2. All of the functions got moved to plugins. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "When the outcome of a meeting is to have another meeting, it has been a lousy meeting."

Re: RelayChecker 0.3

The Doctor wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: New version of RelayChecker. http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar Changes: - It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin directory, expand it, and all should be good. T

Re: RelayChecker 0.3

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0800, John Rudd wrote: > > New version of RelayChecker. > > http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar > > Changes: > > - It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin > directory, expand it, and all should be good. The

RelayChecker 0.3

New version of RelayChecker. http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/RelayChecker.tar Changes: - It's now in a single tar file. Put the tar file into your plugin directory, expand it, and all should be good. The tar file includes: COPYING- the GPL RelayChecker.txt

Re: error from sa-learn --dump data

twofers wrote: > Can someone help me understand what this means? Whats broken? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump data > bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm > line 196. > bayes: baye

Re: Is this a problem with 3.2.0pr?

Where is EvalTests.pm now then? On Nov 12, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote: [6858] dbg: rules: ran eval rule TVD_SPACE_RATIO ==> got hit (1) rules: failed to run CHARSET_FARAWAY test, skipping: (Can't locate object method "are_more_high_bits_set" via package "Mail::SpamAs

Is this a problem with 3.2.0pr?

[6858] dbg: rules: ran eval rule TVD_SPACE_RATIO ==> got hit (1) rules: failed to run CHARSET_FARAWAY test, skipping: (Can't locate object method "are_more_high_bits_set" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at /home/robert/TRUNK/lib/ perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassi

Re: spam that only hits the BAYES_99 rule

Tom H wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: >> Tom H wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was getting hit by a great deal of spam that only hits the BAYES_99 >>> >>> I would be grateful for any ideas on this... >>> >> Sounds like the message contains a URI that is now listed in many of the >> SURBL and URIBL

Re: When Bayes goes bad... How to fix?

Bob Proulx wrote: > > > I am guessing that H*c is a header and some specific token. > If there a key somewhere that will help decode these? > >From Bayes.pm: %HEADER_NAME_COMPRESSION = ( 'Message-Id' => '*m', 'Message-ID' => '*M', 'Received'=> '*r', 'User-A

Re: question re. whitelist_from_rcvd

Not as easily done as said. Matthias Leisi wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: Do you *really* need to pass locally generated mail through Spamassassin? Most likely not. I prefer to, since I have a number of users who use my machine as their SMTP route to the world - and you never know when a des

Re: question re. whitelist_from_rcvd

Miles Fidelman wrote: Do you *really* need to pass locally generated mail through Spamassassin? Most likely not. > *Received: * from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by > server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDE2B6C2F0 for > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Running spamc via postfix not as user "nobody"

Michael Frotscher wrote: On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:49, Michael Scheidell wrote: What happens with this: user=${recipient} argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} > ${recipient} Does not work. are you after user=${user} But I found that postfix knows

Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin and Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf

John Rudd writes: > So, Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin says, in the doc section for > parse_config, that I should store my config data in a > Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf object (and that the one I should use is both > passed into the options for parse_config and can be accessed as > $plugin->{main}->

First time sa-update gotcha questions

Hello All! SoI'm thinking about trying sa-update. My rules are in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Are there any gotchas or things I need to be wary of before I plunge ahead? Just curious as I see a lot of traffic on this topic in here. Thanks. James

Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin and Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf

So, Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin says, in the doc section for parse_config, that I should store my config data in a Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf object (and that the one I should use is both passed into the options for parse_config and can be accessed as $plugin->{main}->{conf}). But, Mail::SpamA

Re: Creating a "signature" of an email

On Sun, November 12, 2006 13:26, Dirk Bonengel wrote: > That's interesting, didn't know that. thats what maillists are for imho :-) > But that means I get still get one test yes from spamassassin it will be one test to 2 pyzord servers > I can't have different tests/scores for different pyzor

Re: Is there a release date for 3.1.8?

Well I invoke SA from a perlscript via .qmail so theoretically I can install another version in another directory under PERL5LIB but I need to make sure bayes and all config is separate from my existing version. On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote: If you want to try the tr

Re: Exim4 / spamd --username question

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:41:34AM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote: > Exim does not actually run spamc, it connects directly to spamd. > > spamd does run as root. Exim can connect as nobody depending on your > configuration. Generally though, you want to have a writable home > directory so it is

Re: question re. whitelist_from_rcvd

Matt Kettler wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to whitelist control messages generated by our list manager (Sympa) - which are generated on the localhost and sent to addresses on the localhost. In particular, here's a specific example: *From: * [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Exim4 / spamd --username question

> -Original Message- > From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: zondag 12 november 2006 18:35 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Exim4 / spamd --username question > > > > Exim does not actually run spamc, it connects directly to > spamd. Slightly OT, I gu

Re: error from sa-learn --dump data

twofers wrote: > [22325] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks > [22325] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_seen > [22325] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 0 > bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at > /usr/lib/perl5/si

Re: spam that only hits the BAYES_99 rule

Matt Kettler wrote: Tom H wrote: Hi, I was getting hit by a great deal of spam that only hits the BAYES_99 I would be grateful for any ideas on this... Sounds like the message contains a URI that is now listed in many of the SURBL and URIBL lists. It may be that this got listed afte

Re: spamassassin stuck in local mode

David Cottle wrote: > I am using spamassassin 3.1.6 Its working fine except I cant get > DCC, Pyzor, Razor 2 and spamcop tests to work, when I lint the rules > it just complains its in local mode. Run a test message through with debugging turned on. | spamassassin -d -t -D 2>&1 | less Then

Re: When Bayes goes bad... How to fix?

Matt Kettler wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > I am still trying to figure out why Bayes is giving so many false > > positives. It is really starting to perform badly. I am about to the point of resetting the database. But then I expect that it will trip into the current state again. So I am tryin

Re: Is there a release date for 3.1.8?

You could browse the messages on the dev list or the commit logs from svn. Robert Nicholson wrote: Also since the Changes file doesn't appear to have been updated in a long while how can I learn the differences b/w each release/trunk code? On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:

Re: Is there a release date for 3.1.8?

If you want to try the trunk version, I would suggest you keep it on a separate server. Robert Nicholson wrote: Are the configuration files backward compatible? If I add short circuit entries to my config file will that file only work with the trunk code? ie. are unrecognised configuration

SpamAssassin in Mac OSX Server?

Is anybody using SpamAssassin in conjunction with OSX Server 10.4 and is it simply to simply upgrade the SA release independent of what ships with OSX Server and keep all the GUI configuration working?

Re: Exim4 / spamd --username question

Exim does not actually run spamc, it connects directly to spamd. spamd does run as root. Exim can connect as nobody depending on your configuration. Generally though, you want to have a writable home directory so it is easiest to create a user for this purpose that Exim can connect as. Bil

Re: Is there a release date for 3.1.8?

Also since the Changes file doesn't appear to have been updated in a long while how can I learn the differences b/w each release/trunk code? On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote: The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote: Robert Nichols

Re: Is there a release date for 3.1.8?

Are the configuration files backward compatible? If I add short circuit entries to my config file will that file only work with the trunk code? ie. are unrecognised configuration directives simply ignored? I want to try the trunk code and I can setup some symlinks for the perl modules but

Re: Is there a release date for 3.1.8?

The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote: Robert Nicholson wrote: When will the Shortcircuit feature be made available in a release? The Shortcircuit plugin should be available in 3.2.0. Recent messages have suggested that this might be released before

user_prefs / shared bayes database

Well I took this idea and also tried to create a single bayes database but it doesn't seem to be working.   In local.cf I added bayes_path /var/spool/bayes_db/ and bayes_file_mode 0770 and allow_user_rules 1   I also created mkdir /var/spool/bayes_db and chmod 0770 /var/spool/bayes_db   Then

New FuzzyOcr Development Release (3.4.x)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, for those that are not on the devel-spam Mailing list, I'd like to announce a new development release here. If you are interested, our new website is located at http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ The branch has been tested by me and some othe

Exim4 / spamd --username question

I'm not clear if I need to run spamd as a specific user or run as root and use spamd -H . This is a single mail server running Debian Stable with the packages listed below. SA configuration is system-wide, that is, there's no user-specific configurations to worry about. ii exim4-daemon-h 4.50-8

RE: large increase in spam after upgrading SA

> > I just upgraded SA from 3.1.0 to the current 3.1.7 via CPAN and > am finding > that a huge increase in the amount of spam that's coming in. On the order > of almost 10 times the number that leaked into my inbox. > > Has anyone else run into this behavior? If so, what can I do? > Configurations

Re: question re. whitelist_from_rcvd

Matt Kettler wrote: Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to whitelist control messages generated by our list manager (Sympa) - which are generated on the localhost and sent to addresses on the localhost. In particular, here's a specific example: *From: * [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: CGPSA + MySQL, Userprefs Problems

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:59:33 +0100, Magnus Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem with CGPSA and MySQL Userprefs settings. > > For the record, this *was* working a few days ago when I was testing to > set it up, but somehow it stopped working suddenly. Just in time for me > to implement

Re: Running spamc via postfix not as user "nobody"

On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:49, Michael Scheidell wrote: > What happens with this: >user=${recipient} argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f > ${sender} > ${recipient} Does not work. But I found that postfix knows serveral variables for each incoming mail, one of them being the

Re: Creating a "signature" of an email

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 06:38:42 +0100 (CET) "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, November 11, 2006 20:47, Dirk Bonengel wrote: > > > The fine thing is that you can use the iXhash plugin along razor, pyzor and > > dcc. (I don't know if it's possible to use two pyzor servers from w

CGPSA + MySQL, Userprefs Problems

Hi, I'm having a problem with CGPSA and MySQL Userprefs settings. For the record, this *was* working a few days ago when I was testing to set it up, but somehow it stopped working suddenly. Just in time for me to implement it into a working system. Well, my problem is that it only reacts on Glo

Re: error from sa-learn --dump data

If this helps...   [22325] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all[22325] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG[22325] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.1.5[22325] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.[22325] dbg: util: running in taint mode? yes[22325] dbg: util: taint mode: deleting unsafe environment va

error from sa-learn --dump data

Can someone help me understand what this means? Whats broken?   [EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump data bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm line 196. bayes: bayes db version 0 is not abl

user_prefs

Thanks Karl and Nick,   Yes, the new account user_prefs is being created (I'm creating it from Plesk BTW) however the new user_prefs seems to be created with default values from I don't know where and not those values in either of the two .template files.   That's my problem in a nut shell. May

Re: spamassassin stuck in local mode

On Sunday 12 November 2006 02:13, David Cottle wrote: > Hey, > > I am running Fedora Core 4, with latest repos from Atomic Rocket > Turtle. Server runs Plesk 8.01. > > I am using spamassassin 3.1.6 Its working fine except I cant get > DCC, Pyzor, Razor 2 and spamcop tests to work, when I lint the

spamassassin stuck in local mode

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, I am running Fedora Core 4, with latest repos from Atomic Rocket Turtle. Server runs Plesk 8.01. I am using spamassassin 3.1.6 Its working fine except I cant get DCC, Pyzor, Razor 2 and spamcop tests to work, when I lint the rules it just c

Re: user_prefs

On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 02:06 -0800, twofers wrote: > I am trying to find out if I can change some prefs so that the new > user_prefs file will contain my prefs when it is newly created. > > I have changed prefs in user_prefs.template and that didn't make any > difference. I assume this template is

Re: large increase in spam after upgrading SA

Hoover Chan skrev: I just upgraded SA from 3.1.0 to the current 3.1.7 via CPAN and am finding that a huge increase in the amount of spam that's coming in. On the order of almost 10 times the number that leaked into my inbox. Has anyone else run into this behavior? If so, what can I do? Config

large increase in spam after upgrading SA

I just upgraded SA from 3.1.0 to the current 3.1.7 via CPAN and am finding that a huge increase in the amount of spam that's coming in. On the order of almost 10 times the number that leaked into my inbox. Has anyone else run into this behavior? If so, what can I do? Configurations are unchang

Re: user_prefs

twofers wrote: I am re-submitting this question for help: I have searched for several hours and can't seem to find the answer to this. I've found close answers, but not complete. I have SA set up as individual users. When a new user is created SA creates a new user_prefs file for them. This

user_prefs

I am re-submitting this question for help:   I have searched for several hours and can't seem to find the answer to this. I've found close answers, but not complete.   I have SA set up as individual users. When a new user is created SA creates a new user_prefs file for them. This file contains

Re: When Bayes goes bad... How to fix?

Bob Proulx wrote: > I am still trying to figure out why Bayes is giving so many false > positives. > > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version > 0.000 0 101467 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 39694 0 non-token data: n

Re: question re. whitelist_from_rcvd

Miles Fidelman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out how to whitelist control messages generated > by our list manager (Sympa) - which are generated on the localhost and > sent to addresses on the localhost. > > In particular, here's a specific example: > > *From: * [EMAIL PROTECTED]