RE: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
ay, April 30, 2008 1:23 PM To: Jason J. Ellingson Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume * Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 11:07]: > Yup... I got the "server" portion running... The trick now is to get > SpamA

Re: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 13:21]: > I am trying those settings, yet I get no Pyzor hits. > > I can manually do a "readyexec /tmp/pyzor ping" which works fine... > > Any other suggestions? > Try running spamassassin with debug mode on

RE: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
o: Jason J. Ellingson Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume * Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 11:07]: > Yup... I got the "server" portion running... The trick now is to get > SpamAssassin to use "readyex

Re: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 11:07]: > Yup... I got the "server" portion running... The trick now is to get > SpamAssassin to use "readyexec /tmp/pyzor" instead of just "pyzor"... > Any suggestions? I was looking at modifying

Re: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Jason J. Ellingson wrote: Yup... I got the "server" portion running... The trick now is to get SpamAssassin to use "readyexec /tmp/pyzor" instead of just "pyzor"... Any suggestions? I was looking at modifying Pyzor.pm in the SpamAssassin perl directory. My guess..

RE: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
-- From: Ben Poliakoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:02 PM To: Jason J. Ellingson Cc: Robert Blayzor; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Using Pzyor with high volume * Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 10:59]: > I decided to look into this a

Re: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 10:59]: > I decided to look into this as well. > > I managed to get ReadyExec installed, but am having difficulty changing > the Pyzor.pm to find and use readyexec properly. Anyone else have luck? > This works for me:

RE: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
I decided to look into this as well. I managed to get ReadyExec installed, but am having difficulty changing the Pyzor.pm to find and use readyexec properly. Anyone else have luck? - Jason -Original Message- From: Robert Blayzor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 200

Re: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Ben Poliakoff wrote: Seems to be just the sort of thing to address your concern (short of a perl implementation of the pyzor client). I should note that *I* haven't used the ReadyExec stuff in my environment [1] (where executing the pyzor client hasn't been much o

Re: Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Robert Blayzor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20080430 07:46]: > In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this at > any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl module > that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA hav

Using Pzyor with high volume

2008-04-30 Thread Robert Blayzor
In regards to Pyzor. I'm wondering if anyone out there is using this at any large scale. Unlike the razor-agent which appears to be a Perl module that gets loaded at startup, I'm concerned about SA having to exec the python interpreter and having that setup/teardown time for each and eve

Re: [OT] ClamAV

2008-04-30 Thread Arthur Dent
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote: > On 30.04.2008 13:29, jpff wrote: >> Has something happened to msrbl.com ? I have been using the Image >> database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished. > > We get a lot of these errors: > rsync: getaddrinfo: rs

Re: [OT] ClamAV

2008-04-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 30.04.08 12:29, jpff wrote: > Has something happened to msrbl.com ? I have been using the Image > database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished. their DNS is broken - glue records contain different IPs than domein itself, one of servers is down and the another one contains

Re: [OT] ClamAV

2008-04-30 Thread Wolfgang Zeikat
On 30.04.2008 13:29, jpff wrote: Has something happened to msrbl.com ? I have been using the Image database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished. We get a lot of these errors: rsync: getaddrinfo: rsync.mirror.msrbl.com 873: Name or service not known rsync error: error in s

Re: [OT] ClamAV

2008-04-30 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:29:34 +0100, jpff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Has something happened to msrbl.com ? I have been using the Image >database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished. >==John ffitch Hi John, seems OK from here. Checking for .ndb files Updated: phish.ndb W

[OT] ClamAV

2008-04-30 Thread jpff
Has something happened to msrbl.com ? I have been using the Image database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished. ==John ffitch

Bayes Learning with Analysis Attached

2008-04-30 Thread Matt Florido
New to SA 3.2.4 running on Ubuntu 8.04. I noticed SA attaches an analysis summary for all mails it detects as spam which is a nice feature. However, I'm wondering if this impacts sa-learn? Can I simply run sa-learn on mails that have the analysis attached? I also noticed I'm not seeing Bayes pa