Apr 7 10:07:41 lancaster check[1339]: Use of uninitialized value
$origip in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm line 346.
3.3.1 in Debian Lenny, compiled via CPAN.
I have not seen this message before, but now it came. I have no idea of
he doesn't take FPs into account. this is a very serious problem with
the methodology.
--j.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 03:41, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last October Marc posted the following URL that compared the various RBLs:
>
>> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
>
> It seems barracuda is still
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
> uriLOCAL_URI_BITLY m{https?://bit\.ly/\w{6}}
> describe LOCAL_URI_BITLY contains bit.ly link
bit.ly is a legitimate URL-shortening service. Are you sure
Alex wrote:
Hi,
Last October Marc posted the following URL that compared the various RBLs:
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
It seems barracuda is still leading, but is that also everyone's
experience? Can anyone provide details on how Jeff computed this
information and is it as cut-an
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 11:38 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> Alex wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Last October Marc posted the following URL that compared the various RBLs:
> >
> >> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
> >
> > It seems barracuda is still leading, but is that also everyone's
> > experience?
On 07/04/2010 12:01, corpus.defero wrote:
During the last year I don't think I've seen a single FP hit against
barracuda :surprised: That said, I still haven't found the confidence to
implement it at the smtp stage for outright rejection but the numbers
I'm seeing do tend towards telling me the
On 2010-04-01 19:06, Adam Katz wrote:
For what it's worth, I reconfigured my greylisting relay from a
blanket delay to delaying only spamcop neighbors, anything that hits a
DNSBL, and any Windows *desktop* (using p0f).
I once tried that, had had to refrain from it. The groupware system
FirstCl
* Ned Slider :
> Last year when the barracuda config was first posted to this list, I
> implemented it on my personal mail server with a very high score so
> as to trigger automatic quarantines for all mail hitting the list,
> and have since checked all hits by hand. I currently use zen.spamhaus
>
On Wednesday, 7 of April 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Here's another good list that rates quality.
>
> http://www.intra2net.com/en/support/antispam/index.php
The methodology behind this rating is kinda peculiar.
What good is counting messages hit by lists? If I make a DNSBL which just
marks gmail
Matt Kettler writes:
> On 4/4/2010 12:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> When running sa-update with -D I see when there are updates the folowing
>> lines:
>> Apr 4 18:26:15.954 [12630] dbg: config: warning: score set for
>> non-existent rule SHORTCIRCUIT
>> Apr 4 18:26:15.957 [12630] d
Hi!
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
It seems barracuda is still leading, but is that also everyone's
experience? Can anyone provide details on how Jeff computed this
information and is it as cut-and-dried as this makes it seem? IOW,
barracuda, the free service, is "better" than all th
Hi,
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
[...]
> Setup a blacklist blocking ANY ip and you are ranked #1 in this test.
> Its of no use at all IMHO.
Yes, certainly, and I guess it was a loaded question of me to ask,
because it was almost too obvious that I thought I was missing
something.
Hi!
Setup a blacklist blocking ANY ip and you are ranked #1 in this test.
Its of no use at all IMHO.
Yes, certainly, and I guess it was a loaded question of me to ask,
because it was almost too obvious that I thought I was missing
something. I don't think it's _completely_ useless though, bec
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 15:14 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >>> http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
>
> >> It seems barracuda is still leading, but is that also everyone's
> >> experience? Can anyone provide details on how Jeff computed this
> >> information and is it as cut-and-dr
Alex wrote on Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:41:18 -0400:
> > http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
This list is not useable for choosing your preferred RBL. It doesn't take
false positives into account. apews.org for instance is not usable at all
and sorbs is only usable when you exclude their spamtraps
Thomas Höhlig wrote on Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:24:58 +0200:
> Can anyone tell me where i can find the option to deactivate the
> "answer-mail".
Ask on the sa-exim list.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
I think you intended this for the list.
Rajesh M wrote:
> hi
>
> there is a work around for this
>
> if you standard score is say : 5.0
>
> you can write a header rule to allocate a positive or negative score if
> the to field contains the specific domain
>
> example
>
> required_score 5
>
> heade
Jari,
> Apr 7 10:07:41 lancaster check[1339]: Use of uninitialized value
> $origip in concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm line 346.
>
> 3.3.1 in Debian Lenny, compiled via CPAN.
>
> I have not seen this message before, but now it came
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Royce Williams wrote:
>>
>> Some new information. In this 2008 thread:
>>
>> http://old.nabble.com/ALL_TRUSTED-and-DOS_OE_TO_MX-td15659736.html
>>
>> ... Daryl says:
>>
>> "So if (and I'll admit I don't think this occurred to me before) you're
Rajesh M wrote:
if you standard score is say : 5.0
you can write a header rule to allocate a positive or negative score if
the to field contains the specific domain
example
required_score 5
header header1 To =~ /example1\.com/i
score header1 -1
Your rule would not work with Bcc mail (for examp
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Royce Williams wrote:
> Also, I think that an example snippet of.cf illustrating and briefly
> explaining each of the three _networks options might be in order, and
> might make the reading, re-reading, and re-reading of the docs a
> little less painful. Writing on
Hi
i have installed spamassassin 3.2.5 with qmail
i would like to configure site wide
so iam following this URL
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
I have added
bayes_path /var/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
lines to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file
s
On 4/7/2010 7:41 AM, corpus.defero wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 15:14 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
It seems barracuda is still leading, but is that also everyone's
experience? Can anyone provide details on how Jeff
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, ram wrote:
sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to/directory/full/of/spam/msgs
sa-learn --ham --showdots --dir /path/to/directory/full/of/ham/msgs
i have not able to understand this path ?
i need to created seperate user for this like s...@domain.com, is this
correct.
N
Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
> Thomas Höhlig wrote on Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:24:58 +0200:
>
>> Can anyone tell me where i can find the option to deactivate the
>> "answer-mail".
>
> Ask on the sa-exim list.
>
yes. and make sure not to confuse reject ("say go away") with bounce
("accept message, then la
On 7.4.2010 19:12, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Jari,
>
>> Apr 7 10:07:41 lancaster check[1339]: Use of uninitialized value
>> $origip in concatenation (.) or string at
>> /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/AutoWhitelist.pm line 346.
>>
>> 3.3.1 in Debian Lenny, compiled via CPAN.
>>
>> I h
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:27 AM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, ram wrote:
>
> sa-learn --spam --showdots --dir /path/to/directory/full/of/spam/msgs
>> sa-learn --ham --showdots --dir /path/to/directory/full/of/ham/msgs
>>
>> i have not able to understand this path ?
>>
>> i need to cre
27 matches
Mail list logo
