-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
George,
On 5/25/17 1:35 PM, George Stanchev wrote:
> Is a HTTP/2 call to Tomcat proxied via IIS / JK Connector (Tomcat
> Connector) expected to succeed?
No, it won't work.
You will need to use mod_proxy_http2[1] with httpd or
Hi,
Is a HTTP/2 call to Tomcat proxied via IIS / JK Connector (Tomcat Connector)
expected to succeed?
George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/24/15 9:34 AM, Razi Ansari wrote:
>
>> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:15:29 -0400> From:
>> ch...@christopherschultz.net To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject:
>> Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
>
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:15:29 -0400> From: ch...@christopherschultz.net
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Razi,
>
> (What email program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/22/15 9:41 PM, Razi wrote:
> -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent:
> Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re:
> Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
>
> Razi,
>
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
(What email program are you using? It doesn't seem to understand
mailing lists because your replies don't include the thread-id
required to properly-group mailing list threads. That's pretty
frustrating because all your messages look separate
/http_bad_Request.html
There is no error in the Jboss application server logs.
Warm Regards
Razi A. Ansari
HP # 90625741
-Original Message-
From: Razi
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 9:41 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
Christopher,
When
hanks
Warm Regards
Razi A. Ansari
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/22/15 6:39 PM, Razi Ansari
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/22/15 6:39 PM, Razi Ansari wrote:
> Original message From: Christopher Schultz
> Date: 04/23/2015 6:15 AM
> (GMT+08:00) To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
Please check inline for my reply . Thanks.
Original message
From: Christopher Schultz
Date: 04/23/2015 6:15 AM (GMT+08:00)
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/22
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/22/15 5:45 PM, Razi wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> Any random request fails, ajax or non-ajax.
>
> The worker.properties is as follows::
>
> worker.lbroutex.type=lb
> worker.lbroutex.balance_workers=wo
-binding="https" secure="true">
protocol=""/>
socket-binding="ajp"/>
Warm Regards
Razi A. Ansari
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Razi,
On 4/21/15 5:18 PM, Razi wrote:
> Another bit of information I wanted to add.
>
> The apache error log is peppered with the following line : OpenSSL
> : I/O error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#...
Are those errors correlated with the
.
Original message
From: Marcos Almeida Azevedo
Date: 04/22/2015 3:37 PM (GMT+08:00)
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Razi wrote:
> hi there,
>
> Another bit of information I wanted to add.
>
ari
>
>
> From: Razi
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 8:37 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
>
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to explain my scenario, perhaps this has been answered on
> this forum.
>
> A bunch of ran
: Apache Tomcat jk connector 400 bad request
Hi there,
I would like to explain my scenario, perhaps this has been answered on this
forum.
A bunch of random Ajax requests from the browser (IE9) end up with a 400 error
code on the apache webserver and the the browser hangs for 5 minutes. Httpwatch
Hi there,
I would like to explain my scenario, perhaps this has been answered on this
forum.
A bunch of random Ajax requests from the browser (IE9) end up with a 400 error
code on the apache webserver and the the browser hangs for 5 minutes. Httpwatch
shows the error code as ERROR_INTERNET_CON
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/26/2011 4:19 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> 1) it happened only once
> 2) the same configuration has been working without showing such a
> problem for at least one year
> 3) neither IIS nor Tomcat nor isapi_redirector were recently updated
> 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick,
On 5/25/2011 6:31 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
> Thanks for the insight. I'll give it a little more time, but I'm being
> pushed by my superiors here for an answer that I can't give, so I'll have
> to file a bug before long.
Certainly when logging
Nick Williams wrote:
Thanks for the insight. I'll give it a little more time, but I'm being
pushed by my superiors here for an answer that I can't give, so I'll have
to file a bug before long.
Does anyone know if there are any other (open source OR commercial/paid)
alternatives to integrating To
mcat with IIS and/or Apache?
N
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK Connector failure after IIS recycle - version 1.2.30
Nick Williams wrote:
> Does anyone have any feeback? Do I need
Nick Williams wrote:
Does anyone have any feeback? Do I need to report a bug?
My own experience with this list, is that when someone reports an issue or asks a question
which fits with the knowledge or experience of the people on the list, usually the
reaction time is short. So the fact tha
Does anyone have any feeback? Do I need to report a bug?
Nick
*From:* Nick Williams [mailto:nicholas.willi...@puresafety.com]
*Sent:* Friday, May 20, 2011 6:19 PM
*To:* 'Tomcat Users List'
*Subject:* JK Connector failure after IIS recycle - version 1.2.30
Environment:
Windows S
Environment:
Windows Server 2008
IIS 7.0
Tomcat 6.0.29
ISAPI Redirect JK Connector 1.2.30
At 14:06:57 this afternoon, IIS performed a recycle (it does this ever 29
hours and has for years without causing us problems):
“A worker process with process id of '10536' serving applic
ety.com
Learn How We Can Empower You. View Our Demos.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of JK Connector vs. ARR
Nick Williams wrote:
...
>
>
> On the one hand,
Nick Williams wrote:
...
On the one hand, we could use the Apache JK Connector to direct requests to
Tomcat. On the other hand, since we’re using IIS7, we could use (and have
seen recommended) the Application Request Routing (ARR) library for IIS to
direct requests for Tomcat.
As it happens
On 22/03/2011 12:56, Nick Williams wrote:
> Also, the Apache Portable Runtime is only useful over HTTP and not AJP,
> right? Making that an advantage of ARR over JK?
There are BIO and APR/native versions of the Tomcat AJP connector.
APR/native can be useful for both HTTP and AJP. How useful depend
approach to take.
On the one hand, we could use the Apache JK Connector to direct requests to
Tomcat. On the other hand, since we’re using IIS7, we could use (and have
seen recommended) the Application Request Routing (ARR) library for IIS to
direct requests for Tomcat.
I was hoping members of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 6/30/2010 11:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: JK connector and extra characters showing up
>>
>> Those 4 extra characters are lik
> From: David Brown [mailto:captki...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: JK connector and extra characters showing up
>
> Now here's what I'm seeing. In dump A (tomcat jk) in
> packet 2 at line 00c0 look at the end of the line's
> hex. It's 03 1f f8 40. Pay attent
een tomcat and the web server, AJP
protocol. Since it was the same for both Apache and SunOne I only posted one
of them.
The second and third are from between a browser and the web server, Apache
and SunOne. The only difference is the web server and the JK connector
(mod_jk vs jk_nsapi). S
On 01.07.2010 03:00, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 6/30/2010 3:32 PM, David Brown wrote:
Problem:
Extra characters showing up in some content delivered from tomcat. I believe
they are from the JK connector when it breaks up the content
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: JK connector and extra characters showing up
Those 4 extra characters are likely to be the chunk size. 31 66 66 38
is, well, "1ff8", which is 792 in decimal.
Not on my calcula
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: JK connector and extra characters showing up
>
> Those 4 extra characters are likely to be the chunk size. 31 66 66 38
> is, well, "1ff8", which is 792 in decimal.
Not on my calculator;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 6/30/2010 3:32 PM, David Brown wrote:
> Problem:
>
> Extra characters showing up in some content delivered from tomcat. I believe
> they are from the JK connector when it breaks up the content into 8k
> packets.
>
> S
Problem:
Extra characters showing up in some content delivered from tomcat. I believe
they are from the JK connector when it breaks up the content into 8k
packets.
Setup:
Tomcat 5.5 -> JK 1.2.30 -> SunOne 6.1sp11
I tested using Apache2 and the problem does not show up there. Using
I'm trying to build and get working the tomcat-connector on OpenSolaris
using SunOne webserver 7.
I've built it with GCC and/or CC but when I try to start and instance of the
web server I get the line
[Thu Feb 04 21:05:05.989 2010] [29901:1] [debug] jk_init::jk_nsapi_plugin.c
(301): jk_init, a
meetali dey wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use JK connector,
but at http://tomcat.apache.org <http://www.tom/> site , many
documentation links are not opening/working -
eg 1) http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/workers.html
2) http://tomcat.apache.org/connecto
meetali dey wrote:
[...]
Hi.
Kindly check the archives of this list, particularly in the last 2 days.
There was a thread named "Connecting Apache Tomcat to Apache" which
would probably be of great help.
On this page :
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
under "Archives", you find a series of UR
Hi,
>
> I am trying to use JK connector,
> but at http://tomcat.apache.org <http://www.tom/> site , many
> documentation links are not opening/working -
>
> eg 1) http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/workers.html
> 2) http://tomcat.apache.o
Hi,
>
> I am trying to use JK connector,
> but at http://tomcat.apache.org <http://www.tom/> site , many
> documentation links are not opening/working -
>
> eg 1) http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/workers.html
> 2) http://tomcat.apache.o
this/ status code.
> Also note that, as I already wrote, in this case the JK connector breaks ALL
> requests whose URL+query string exceeds the max URL length value, not just
> the ones being AJP redirected to Tomcat.
Interesting.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.
rceControl/ListDownloadableCommits.aspx)
This is a good suggestion.
Also note that, as I already wrote, in this case the JK connector breaks ALL
requests whose URL+query string exceeds the max URL length value, not just
the ones being AJP redirected to Tomcat.
What we can do is make that configurable, cause t
ossible that IIS is the one
>> ruining your day? I don't know of a good IIS API resource, so you might
>> have to track this one down yourself.
>>
>> Just a thought.
>> - -chris
>>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> The k
ERNET_MAX_URL_LENGTH];
>
> INTERNET_MAX_URL_LENGTH does not seem to be defined in mod_jk's source,
> so it probably comes from IIS itself. Is it possible that IIS is the one
> ruining your day? I don't know of a good IIS API resource, so you might
> have to track this one down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Br1,
br1 wrote:
> Do you think this limit will be increased in the next versions?
>
> In theory, no limit is imposed by the protocol itself. I would tend to think
> JK should at least support what the JK supported platforms support.
The source code
se this limit is at home. And maybe
>> not for much longer. :-)
>>
>
>
> has the browser send request parameters in the body of the request,
> instead of the URL. No 2K limit there.
>
>
> -----
> To
br1 wrote:
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
It looks like we only support URLs up to 2047 Bytes (+/- 1).
Regards,
Rainer
Hey Rainer,
Do you think this limit will be increased in the next versions?
In theory, no limit is imposed by the protocol itself. I would tend to think
JK should at least support
at 2k are more than enough for
any URL, but the only place I can impose this limit is at home. And maybe
not for much longer. :-)
Thank you,
Br1.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-connector-fails-with-long-URLs-tp21443475p21489226.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
johnrock wrote:
> I am trying to figure out the best way to configure tomcat 6 to work under
> apache2.2 running on XP. I have seen a way to 'auto configure' the jk
> connector, and another way to manually configure it in
On 15.01.2009 14:53, br1 wrote:
Additional info:
- Machines are IIS 5 on Windows 2000 Server
- Though the same happens on my XP laptop
- The JK log shows this error message, with the line number varying between
JK versions, here is the 1.2.27 one:
[error] jk_isapi_plugin.c (1852): error while get
periencing a problem with the JK connector.
>
> I have a customer that uses insanely long URLs for his Tomcat application.
> Here is the configuration:
> IIS 5
> JK 1.2.26 (also tested with 1.2.27 and 1.2.14)
>
> By opening one of these URLs, if more than 2102 bytes lon
Hi,
I am experiencing a problem with the JK connector.
I have a customer that uses insanely long URLs for his Tomcat application.
Here is the configuration:
IIS 5
JK 1.2.26 (also tested with 1.2.27 and 1.2.14)
By opening one of these URLs, if more than 2102 bytes long, the browser
shows this
figure out the best way to configure tomcat 6 to work under
> apache2.2 running on XP. I have seen a way to 'auto configure' the jk
> connector, and another way to manually configure it in the httpd.conf file.
> It seems the auto configure is easier, but are there important advan
I am trying to figure out the best way to configure tomcat 6 to work under
apache2.2 running on XP. I have seen a way to 'auto configure' the jk
connector, and another way to manually configure it in the httpd.conf file.
It seems the auto configure is easier, but are there important
Rainer, about the patch below :
Is there any chance that this patch would not work if the request being
redirected to Tomcat through mod_jk is a sub-request, and/or being made
from within an authentication handler ?
The reason I am asking :
I know that the patch works when the request is a ma
Hi, all,
Has any idea?
--
From:
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:08 PM
To: "users"
Subject: Problems with JK connector and IIS5 and tomcat 6 (2)
Hi,
I'm using the JMeter to do the stress test on my web application. I set
t:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-JK-connector-and-IIS5-and-tomcat-6-tp20866125p21101017.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For ad
> From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com]
> Subject: Re: [OT] Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.270
>
> Is it? Provided somebody having a jailbreaked *cough* 3G
> - you've got *any* idea where to obtain a copy of the JDK?
Nope; it was just mentione
Hi ho Chuck,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>
> Don't need mod_jk, but Sun does have Java running on the iPhone;
> unfortunately, Mr Jobs won't let them release it.
>
Is it? Provided somebody having a jailbreaked *cough* 3G - you've got
*any* idea where to obtain a
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.3 segfault with Jk connector 1.2.27
> And please note that all the above was done on the
> computer of which Chuck (or Chris?), just a few days
> ago, said that it had less processing power than his
> port
Rainer Jung wrote:
[...]
The internals of this dev version are exactly packaged in the form of an
official release. So the build process works exactly the same (configure
and make), no additional tools needed.
True.
The version will identify itself as 1.2.28-dev, so you can't hide it's
no
André,
what does that tell you?
Update early, update often... ;)
Cheers
Gregor
--
just because your paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you...
gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2
gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371
--
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.12.2008 17:22, Pieter Temmerman wrote:
[...]
Thanks guys.
I just *knew* there was a reason why I forgot all that stuff, I just
could not remember why exactly.
I bet that before I do a "man patch", I'll have to update "man", and
that will probably bring messages that
On 18.12.2008 17:22, Pieter Temmerman wrote:
Hi André,
From my experience I can tell you this partly works, but!..
You need to make sure that the glibc version is the same (or older,
glibc should be backwards compatible).
I usually compile my linux multiplatform binaries in a RH7 machine,
whi
Hi André,
>From my experience I can tell you this partly works, but!..
You need to make sure that the glibc version is the same (or older,
glibc should be backwards compatible).
I usually compile my linux multiplatform binaries in a RH7 machine,
which creates binaries that magically seem to be wo
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.12.2008 13:07, André Warnier wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Could you try the following patch:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/extension_crash.patch
Thanks for any feedback on the patch.
Many thanks for the patch, Rainer, but..
I hate to admit it, but d
On 18.12.2008 13:07, André Warnier wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Could you try the following patch:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/extension_crash.patch
Thanks for any feedback on the patch.
Many thanks for the patch, Rainer, but..
I hate to admit it, but despite being in this
Rainer Jung wrote:
Could you try the following patch:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/extension_crash.patch
Thanks for any feedback on the patch.
Many thanks for the patch, Rainer, but..
I hate to admit it, but despite being in this industry for more than 30
years, I have
On 18.12.2008 00:31, André Warnier wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.12.2008 00:09, Rainer Jung wrote:
Question thus : is my above first configuration invalid ?
Most likely not invalid, but exotic and thereby not well tested (the
SetHandler trick). Will try to reproduce.
I can reproduce, but
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 18.12.2008 00:09, Rainer Jung wrote:
Question thus : is my above first configuration invalid ?
Most likely not invalid, but exotic and thereby not well tested (the
SetHandler trick). Will try to reproduce.
I can reproduce, but only if the request goes to a virtual serve
On 18.12.2008 00:09, Rainer Jung wrote:
Question thus : is my above first configuration invalid ?
Most likely not invalid, but exotic and thereby not well tested (the
SetHandler trick). Will try to reproduce.
I can reproduce, but only if the request goes to a virtual server (VHost).
I've got
On 17.12.2008 23:54, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
Responding to my own earlier message, I think I have found what looks
like a bug with the combination indicated, and a curious (to me)
workaround.
Summary :
under Linux Suse Enterprise 10.1
using the Apache 2.2.3 (prefork) package of that distribut
Hi.
Responding to my own earlier message, I think I have found what looks
like a bug with the combination indicated, and a curious (to me) workaround.
Summary :
under Linux Suse Enterprise 10.1
using the Apache 2.2.3 (prefork) package of that distribution
using mod_jk 1.2.27
In the Apache ma
soon as I invoke a link that should be
re-directed by the Jk connector (Apache error log) :
[Wed Dec 17 15:39:44 2008] [notice] child pid 19144 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
The Tomcat logfiles do not show anything, leading me to believe that the
issue is not there (I can also access
Hi,
I'm using the JMeter to do the stress test on my web application. I set the
number of threads to 20 and loop 100. When I run the testing, I found that
there are many sessions created on the server (I write one record to database
for every session created) (3000 sessions created within 5min)
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 14:27, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the point some people (me) are trying to make is that it is not
> because MS does stupid things, that all software developers have to follow
> suit. And specially not open source software developers.
> "Apache Group
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
Rainer Jung wrote:
Christopher Schultz schrieb:
If you've got "Program Files" already in the path, why not have "Apache
Group" in there as well?
... Germans would love "Apache" Group without spaces ...
And so w
Dear Bill Barker,
Do you mean both errors in IIS log and tomcat log are normal?
Thanks
--
From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 9:02 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Problems with JK connector and IIS5 a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
Rainer Jung wrote:
> Christopher Schultz schrieb:
>> If you've got "Program Files" already in the path, why not have "Apache
>> Group" in there as well?
>
> ... Germans would love "Apache" Group without spaces ...
>
> MS localization transla
quot; message should probably also
be down-graded.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
We have an application using tomcat6.0.16 and IIS5 with JK connector.
We found that there are so many errors in the IIS connector log file.
[Fri Dec 05 09:13:54 2008] [err
Hi,
We have an application using tomcat6.0.16 and IIS5 with JK connector.
We found that there are so many errors in the IIS connector log file.
[Fri Dec 05 09:13:54 2008] [error] jk_isapi_plugin.c (549):
HSE_REQ_SEND_RESPONSE_HEADER failed
[Fri Dec 05 09:13:54 2008] [error] jk_isapi_plugin.c
Christopher Schultz schrieb:
> If you've got "Program Files" already in the path, why not have "Apache
> Group" in there as well?
... Germans would love "Apache" Group without spaces ...
MS localization translates "Program Files" into "Programme", most likely
because in German the words are alway
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
André Warnier wrote:
> Folder/directory/file names with spaces in them are evil, and should be
> forbidden in any new OS, by unanimous decision of the UN Security
> Council, US Supreme Court and EU Commission. The developers who first
> allowe
Peter Crowther wrote:
If you try to stop the accounts team naming their Excel files "Budgets from Margaret 2008-2009" you may find your office surrounded by a mob of pitchfork- and torch-waving users
That is a weak objection.
They can also not name it "Budget 2008/2009" or "Projections sales >
> From: André Warnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Folder/directory/file names with spaces in them are evil, and
> should be
> forbidden in any new OS, by unanimous decision of the UN Security
> Council, US Supreme Court and EU Commission. The developers who first
> allowed this should be tracked d
nitingupta183 wrote:
I was using a folder name with spaces and without putting it inside a double
quote.
You are not the first, and not the last to lose time over this.
Folder/directory/file names with spaces in them are evil, and should be
forbidden in any new OS, by unanimous decision of t
ling this URL, and the result you would
> have expected to get
> - the contents of the httpd error_log, access_log and mod_jk.log.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For a
nitingupta183 schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to integrate Apache server with Tomcat using mod_jk. I am
> folllowing the basic tutorials on this but still cant start the Apache
> server when I configure httpd.conf to load the mod_jk module. It says "The
> requested operation has faiked!". I am
he problem either
and so I am clue less as what can be the problem.
Platform Windows
Tomcat 5.5.25
Apache Server 2.2.10
mod_jk connector 1.2.27
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JK-Connector-problem-tp20813241p20813241.html
André Warnier schrieb:
>> This can happen a lot, if Tomcat has a configured connectionTimeout on
>> the connector, but mod_jk has no timeout for idle connections. Again we
>> would need the configuration, this time also the server.xml.
>
> The Connector tag of server.xml is this :
>
>
Rainer Jung wrote:
[...]
It does since version 1.2.23 (info message during startup). From the log
line numbers I guess you are using 1.2.21 released in March 2007.
That sounds about right. That system (RHEL5) was installed around that
time and still runs the original versions.
[...]
Thi
André Warnier schrieb:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> André,
>>
>> André Warnier wrote:
>>> mod_jk 1.2.x (sorry, don't know the exact version)
>>
>> This is actually quite important when mod_jk is acting funny. Try this:
>>
>> $ strings /path/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
André Warnier wrote:
> mod_jk 1.2.x (sorry, don't know the exact version)
This is actually quite important when mod_jk is acting funny. Try this:
$ strings /path/to/mod_jk.so | grep mod_jk/
mod_jk/1.2.26
Mine appears to be 1.2.26.
> 26.11.2
Hi.
I posted the same question a little while ago, but apparently not in a
way that attracted interest.
Maybe this is not the right list ?
The question :
at a customer site, I am finding the kind of messages below in the
Apache mod_jk module log. What do they mean ?
(I also have error messa
Hi.
Apache 2.0.52
Tomcat 5.5.20
mod_jk 1.2.x (sorry, don't know the exact version)
OS : Linux (hostname) 2.6.9-67.0.15.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Apr 22 13:58:43 EDT
2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
(Red Hat Enterprise Linux)
all the above on the same host.
At a customer site we find repeated traces
ould I be using (i.e. which is the
_latest_ jk connector version? If someone could additionally point me to a
source url that would be awesome.
Thanks a lot
Alessandro Ferrucci
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomca
sense). However, when I go to http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ I
>> notice the latest release if JK-1.2.26.
>>
>
> That book is a few years out of date. mod_jk2 was abandoned and the
> important enhancements back-ported to mod_jk
>
>>
>> My final ques
which JK version should I be using (i.e. which is the
_latest_ jk connector version? If someone could additionally point me to a
source url that would be awesome.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
It is from Tomcat 4 but should give you all you need.
YMMV - I p
d 2.0 (this makes
sense). However, when I go to http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ I
notice the latest release if JK-1.2.26.
My final question is which JK version should I be using (i.e. which is the
_latest_ jk connector version? If someone could additionally point me to a
source url that
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
