Hi Vit,
I checked it out yesterday. The core intention of the framework is clear.
I give you feedback.
best regards
badgers
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Yes, this is known.
We work on the new hosting - a VM managed by Apache Infra.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Francois Meillet <
francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://examples8x.wicket.apache.org/app
Recently I mentioned Wicket to a product manager - and his reply indicated that
he thought Wicket was for UI's but was actually a different programming
language! I quickly pointed out that it's the SAME language as they've used
forever - Java! And that's the point! You can build your domain mode
Hi,
https://examples8x.wicket.apache.org/app
got 404
https://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/app
connection is not secure
https://examples6x.wicket.apache.org/app
connection is not secure
François
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: use
Hi,
I just started using Wicket recently and I quite like what I've seen so
far. To me, it is superior to JSF because it let's you spend more time
writing nice Java code instead of scratching your head whether the correct
hmtl attribute is "render" or "reRender".
I do think Wicket has a marketing
I agree with this wholeheartedly…I was just having this discussion with my
boss yesterday. I do not understand (mostly) this drive to push stateless
frameworks (client or server). Obviously your framework needs to support
stateless as to not waste resources, but almost every application I write
i
As a follow up:
Is there a way to test the back-button (without firing up jetty and
resorting to selenium / htmlunit)?
btw: I know WicketTester has trimmed-down versions of certain components
(MockApplication(), MockPageManager etc). Maybe there is an implementation
that keeps track of the pages
Dang! I thought the app was doing a
continueToOriginalDestination();
to return from the login page to the home page at "/" but it wasn't so there's
no problem with continueToOriginalDestination().
It was actually doing a setResponse(new HomePage()); from a
the LogonPage that had no @MountPath
Found it
It seems FireFox does have an issue with the actions that start with ..?
The page I was going to (localhost/myapp) had a mount path at "/"
i.e.
@MountPath(value = "/", alt = "/home")
Now this mount path annotation was also in the test app that didn't exhibit the
problem but (yes
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Илья Нарыжный wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> We would be happy to help with:
> 1) Translation of any articles/slides to russian and posting that on famous
> russian IT resources. If you have any articles even right now which worst
> to be translated: please send them to me.
I found an interesting difference between the quickstart that works and the app
that doesn't work in FF:
The action parameter of the form is generated with a .. prefix instead of ./
So in the app that doesn't work:
The form's action attribute is defined as:
action="..?32-1.IFormSubmitListener
I'm trying to create a quickstart but so far it doesn't reproduce the problem
in the main app - all day I've been pulling in aspects of the main app in an
attempt to replicate the exact scenario.
I have now managed to get the quickstart to produce JS in the same order that
the main app does so
Is there any kind of defer or async on any of these JS script resources?
Maybe you want to publish the quickstart?
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Chris Colman"
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017 10:06:23
> Betreff: RE: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior n
The cut down app that works fine in FireFox also has both jquery.js and
bootstrap.js so this probably means that it's ok to have both of these together.
./wicket/resource/org.apache.wicket.resource.JQueryResourceReference/jquery/jquery-1.12.4.js
./wicket/resource/de.agilecoders.wicket.webjars.re
Thanks Korginian - I'll check out that theory.
All the JS included are done automatically by a combo of Wicket itself and the
Wicket-Bootstrap project which I'm using in this app.
Is there an easy way to tell which component is contributing which .js to the
"header" (which is actually in the fo
Hi Chris,
can it be that you have 2 instances of jQuery in your page? - bootstrap.js
often comes with embedded jQuery and then you would overwrite the wicket one
with the bootstrap one, that will lead to problems where you dont get notfied
at all. I know this from foundation / sites, where you
16 matches
Mail list logo
