hello,
i use my mobile to make movies on the fly for my videoblog
(http://www.mad-video.blogspot.com/).
To have it right in the window where ist starts, it ist working fine
with appel, and also with firefox Mozilla Browsers.
But With the IE it ist not working at all.
I use this tag: OBJECT
is there a tag being used for this in mefeedia, fireant et al?
d
-- URL: http://29fragiledays.blogspot.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
I try out most of the new video hosting services at least once, so I
tried out the new C|Net upload. They don't offer much in the way of
guidelines before you submit content as to what type of thing they're
looking for, though the set of categories they offer (once you get that
far) gives some
There is a weird thing going on with my Fireant lately. Its displaying
the quicktime window larger than the display window so that I have to
scroll around to see the entire picture. It's the same no matter what
size I chooses to view in. Anyone else have this problem? Is it
something I can fix? Is
yes, just recently on a mac, after attaching and detaching a second
monitor or projector (also changing resolutions a few times)
i think i ended up having to shutdown fireant and reset the screen again
(i had to actually change to a different res and then change back to the
one I wanted before
Hey Eric Rice, et all...
How do we talk to the podcast community interested in doing video and
let them know that a bunch of us have been doing video for a while
now and can help if they'd like?
Verdi
From a WiredNews article:
Oh, and something else: we should all blog about why YouTube sucks, so
that it will become well known and videoblog businesses don't model
themselves after that.
Peter
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job).
Well, let's also try not to over-emphasize this space.It is not the responsibility of every new start-up to FULLY adhere to the demands and wishes of the blogging community. There are many, if not more, regular people who want to share video but have little interest in blogging... or at least
oh, and of course, let's not forget that the Audience is larger than the pool of Content Creators.VC's know this. These are the people that they are interested in, afterall so advertisers can 'reach' them as the attention moves from TV to Internet Video... not to mention the millions of
Right.My points are not saying that VC's have no interest in videoblogging. They do. Investors are tapping into it.There is potentially a huge market space for content creators and services that cater to them.
It takes deeper understandings and analysis than the simpler viral video services,
if when you head is wounded and bleeding, you yell for your roomate to
fetch your video camera before a towel... (that one is from personal
experience)
On 11/7/05, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you may be a vlogger if you have a to-film-list.
On 7 Nov 2005, at 12:38, Gena wrote:
Ah,
Because it works, works fast, and users are generally willing to
sacrifice quality and freedom for just working... look at the threads
over the past months about ourmedia/archive crapping out, average
ADHD-level user just isn't going accept that as a solution. They also
remove the what version
Part of the reason they do well is that their interface and features are very
good IMHO. I'm
not that familiar, but based on a quick perusal, they are doing lots of stuff
right (social
connections, RSS feed (with enclosures), tags, aggregating, ease-of-use,
xml-rpc
interface). They are doing
Good thoughts, Bill.There are many free and cheap flv encoders out there that maybe are worthy of review if it makes more sense to encode yourself opposed to using web services.One that I have tried for Windows is Riva,
http://www.rivavx.comhttp://www.rivavx.com/index.php?encoderL=3sull
On
hmm ... maybe you could get them to add a subscription button on their
page that lets their users subscribe to your feed. I mean if their
viewers would enjoy them so much it seems like something they might
actually like to offer their users. With that and your URL included
in the video ... might
Yeah, I may end up doing that. I have the capabilities to do it
myself. But the fact is that it's dead easy to upload it to YouTube
and let them encode it. And there is the added avantage of them
hosting the files. I'm on par for hitting a 120 gig this cycle so
the more I can save on bandwidth
YouTube was featured on "Call for Help with Leo Laporte" by host Amber MacArthur. Watch VideoAmber tells why she enjoys using the service.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
On 11/8/05, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
The thing that I really don't understand about thee sites receiving
funding is that the barrier to entry for competition is so slim. It
wouldn't be too difficult for a developer to replicate
If it's going on a mainstream resort site, it's doubtful they'll
want to use quicktime (despite it's relative superiority)
Just a thought...
Cheers,
Rob
PS Worrying about rev-sharing on ads won't be worth the effort -
just tell them you need a link to your site. I think you can do it
in a
havilahland33 wrote:
TV sucks. I've heard it nicknamed as 'time vaporizer'. Go vid blogs!
Is it fair to use such a blanket statement? There is plenty of good
stuff on television, most of it is not on the major networks. (Though
Arrested Development nearly made me laugh my *ass* off last
And its what Human Dog has been doing for awhile.
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
On Nov 8, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
Has this been posted?
its some East Coast guys doing a chapter-story in a videoblog.
http://www.reelblogs.com/
I believes this show refers to what Andrew Baron
hey jay,
thanks for the fast answer.
i am relieved to hear your response. (first episode is around 25Mb)
yes we are using a free storage space but it's at ourmedia/archives
which as of now doesn't seem to have limits.
if anyone else has any other opinionsi'm all codec'd ears and eyes.
share
The main thing is length not file size. You're not making a 30 minute tv
show (you could, but it'd hardly be a blog). Personally I like 2 minutes
stories, but as long as you keep each entry under 4-5 minutes..
- Andreas
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:54:00 +0100, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey
mark your calendars
the NYC Videoblogger meet up will be happening at Node101
and it's more than just a plain old meet up
it's a party!
BYOB and bring snacks too
the idea is that all vloggers will bring a non-vlogger and
non-vloggers, bring yourself
(i guess that includes jay and i, do we even
And its what Human Dog has been doing for awhile.
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
yep...Human-dog is one of the unsung heroes.
check out the dog if you havent already.
http://www.human-dog.com/lab/
jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
URL: http://www.momentshowing.net
Yeah there really isn't much going on with the social networking
aspects of YouTube that I can see. They ain't no Flickr that's fer
sho.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think its too early for
hey all
I'll be presenting FreeVlog and Videoblogging in general
at the SoHo Apple Store for their Made on a Mac workshop series.
Please pass this along to anyone you think would be interested in
learning videoblogging in NYC...
Thursday, November 17th 6-8pm
and
Tuesday, December 6th 6:30-8pm
TV sucks. I've heard it nicknamed as 'time vaporizer'. Go vid blogs!
Is it fair to use such a blanket statement? There is plenty of good
stuff on television, most of it is not on the major networks. (Though
Arrested Development nearly made me laugh my *ass* off last night.)
Maybe blogs
ive had a clear realization during the current coverage fo the
Fitzgerald indictments:
blogging lets the people help tell the story.
why?
because journalists either are lazy or dont have the time to research.
usually they turn to think tanks(heritage foundation), experts, etc
for their
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:55:44 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
because journalists either are lazy or dont have the time to research.
usually they turn to think tanks(heritage foundation), experts, etc
for their info
Why don't speaking to someone else constitute research?
I try to keep mine as small as possible just out of courtesy to
viewers who are syncing up a large list of feeds to portable devices
like the iPod or PSP.
Thankfully in most cases, those devices are now coming with very large
capacity. The PSP however still has fairly limited storage – but none
Is the linking something you could do in a saved 5 second vid that you
just copy past to the end of each new video? ... or will that mess up
the text tracks?
- Dave
--
http://www.DavidMeade.com
On 11/8/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's easy to do, it just take a long each
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:12:29 +0100, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that a trick question? First of all, I don't think you can
compare the average newspaper article with an average blog
article.
I wasn't, Jay was. :o)
And, for that matter, the average newspaper article. Are we
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:23:09 +0100, ronenwastaken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most 'serious' newspapers and magazines have replaced serious research
with turnover time and cost-efficiency.
I'd hate to hear what you have to say about lawyers.
*[this is a word I can never spell]
Necessary.
-
Hey everyone, how do u get Tivo'd shows off tivo and into your computer for
editing?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Blogging in itself isn't more true than any other medium.
It's not if I sit around and blog about life on Mars. But when
discussing something that I've experienced first hand, my version is in
fact truer than what would be reported by a journalist who
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:49:32 +0100, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Blogging in itself isn't more true than any other medium.
It's not if I sit around and blog about life on Mars. But when discussing
something that I've experienced first hand, my
On Nov 8, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:Truer for whom?Ever read a news article on a subject that you're intimately familiar with? Maybe it was about a concert you were at, a political function you organized, or a videoblogging community you're a member of?Do they ever not
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:08:43 +0100, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Truer for whom?
Ever read a news article on a subject that you're intimately familiar
with? Maybe it was about a concert you were at, a political function
Exactly, and the same for the average blog entry. Jay was setting things
up to mean 'journalism == lazy, unresearched stories; blogs == The
Truth(tm)'. The generalization is very far from what's going on. Some
journalistic stories are not fact-checked, but they are in the minority.
Some blog
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
Truer for whom?
Ever read a news article on a subject that you're intimately familiar
with? Maybe it was about a concert you were at, a political
From the other end of the spectrum, I try to keep my videos under 5
minutes or 5MB. Although the numbers are getting smaller, not
everybody is on cable/dsl/free or acquired wi-fi.
I think that some vloggers have files that are huge because they don't
know how to compress a video for other types
This is good for PC's , any Mac love out there?
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jake
Ludington
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Tivo to Computer
Hey
Mac aside, even the tivo desktop for PC doesnt
yield a file ready for editing. It is DRM protected.
From:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kearney, Pat
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005
3:26 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE:
This is good for PC's , any Mac love out there?
You didn't scroll down. Oh wait, Mac users don't have a scroll wheel. :P
Jake Ludington
http://www.mediablab.com
http://www.podcastingstarterkit.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video
Mac aside, even the tivo desktop for PC
doesnt yield a file ready for editing. It is DRM protected.
DirectShow Dump deals with the .tivo file
extension problem Im not sure what the Mac equivalent is:
http://prish.com/etivo/tbr.htm
Jake Ludington
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:22:23 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The accuracy of reporting is based on the veractiy of the individual
reporting, not the method of reporting whether through a newspaper,
blog, radio news, podcast, television news, vlog. Those are methods
and technologies,
Mac aside, even the tivo desktop for PC
doesnt yield a file ready for editing. It is DRM protected.
This might help with the Mac problem:
http://www.topsight.net/article.php/20050620123435317
Jake Ludington
http://www.jakeludington.com
http://www.podcastingstarterkit.com
In daily newspapers? Yes. I've read both the kind that made me feel good
(the concert review from the concert I attended the day before) and those
that made me feel not-so-good (generally those involving technical
matters). But the latter are not written for me, and that makes one hell
of a
Alright! We finally committed (maybe we should be committed?) and
filmed this thing we've talked about
forever...rocknrolltv.net! eeahaw.
http://www.rocknrolltv.net
I'm not sure what we are yet? ...music news...and more...but we
plan to include interviews with hollywood-ites...and
great timing:
http://revlog.blogspot.com/2005/11/daily-show-on-gay-marriage.html
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:55:44 +0100, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
because journalists either are lazy or dont have the time to research.
usually they
lol - my wife has far more free space on her iPod than I do on my
Powerbook's 100GB drive!
i wish i could download from fireant, directly to the iPod (not stored
on computer)
David Meade wrote:
I try to keep mine as small as possible just out of courtesy to
viewers who are syncing up a large
rock it!On 11/8/05, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright!We finally committed (maybe we should be committed?) andfilmed this thing we've talked aboutforever...rocknrolltv.net!eeahaw.http://www.rocknrolltv.net
I'm not sure what we are yet?...music news...and more...but weplan to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great timing:
http://revlog.blogspot.com/2005/11/daily-show-on-gay-marriage.html
The Daily Show and http://supr.c.ilio.us/ I often find the most honest
presentation of current issues whether in culture or tech
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol - my wife has far more free space on her iPod than I do on my
Powerbook's 100GB drive!
i wish i could download from fireant, directly to the iPod (not stored
on computer)
I agree. I'm having a hard time
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
I would agree on a very general level. It's true that technically the
medium itself does not determine a stories truthfulness. But some of
those media are layered with a bureaucratic infrastructure that makes
the truth harder to get out in some cases. Sometimes what is not
reported is as important
I dig it! Nice job, keep it up!
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright! We finally committed (maybe we should be committed?) and
filmed this thing we've talked about
forever...rocknrolltv.net! eeahaw.
You are so right Markus. Time is the new bandwidth restriction. Or the
old one, or the one that we all can always count on. The think about
my PVR (generic TIVO) is that I record all this stuff that never gets
watched. There is one night a week that my wife and I really sit down
and watch TV and
Looks dang good from what little I can see, talk to the Hollywood-ites
if you must but please, please, please talk video to independent
bands, lone voices and the un-definables. There is so much good music
here that is just waiting for you to knock on the door.
Having said that, you are under
Hi all,
Check this out. It is a wordpress blog, but it has a video clip
embedded in the template. It's clip of the blogger giving his elevator
speech. I haven't seen this before and really like it. Any clue as to
how one might do this with a typepad blog?
It's a fixed embed within the template itself:
embed src=http://ehub.journalism.ku.edu/~plafferty/wp-content/plafferty.mov
width=160 height=136
autostart=false loop=false href=
http://ehub.journalism.ku.edu/~plafferty/wp-content/plafferty.mov target=
myself/embed
On 11/8/05, Beth Kanter
That's too bad. A buddy of mine runs a destination site
(tahoeguide.com) and tied it into the VCB (Visitors and Convention
Bureau) and lodging services. He's built up a nice residual business
off of sharing in the lodging commissions...On 11/8/05, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Folks -
We've been talking about ease of use in aggregation and I keep hearing
about Flash. Isn't there an open source solution like java that can do
this? I would think the install base should be the same or larger than
a closed system like Flash.
If anyone knows of a java converter/viewer,
You are so right Markus. Time is the new bandwidth restriction. Or the
old one, or the one that we all can always count on. The think about
my PVR (generic TIVO) is that I record all this stuff that never gets
watched. There is one night a week that my wife and I really sit down
and watch TV
or just put the same code in a typelist item and add via the wysiwyg
layout editor, if you're not using templates in typepad
Ted Tagami wrote:
It's a fixed embed within the template itself:
embed src="http://ehub.journalism.ku.edu/~plafferty/wp-content/plafferty.mov
"
width="160"
I think we have all come to a realization that journalism as we know it
can and is biased and generalized. The difference between traditional
journalism and blogging is the perspective. We expect bloggers to
express their views and to some extent, expect their views to be biased
towards
Digital wrote:
Hey Folks -
We've been talking about ease of use in aggregation and I keep hearing
about Flash. Isn't there an open source solution like java that can do
this? I would think the install base should be the same or larger than
a closed system like Flash.
If anyone knows of a java
Yeah but consider PSP users who maybe have a gig. Now consider how
many vlogs you subscribe to ... :-P
Not everyone who wants to take stuff handheld has a portable video
device with so much space.
It's changing ... but we're not in the world of everyone has more
space/bandwidth than they need
check RSSOWL tooOn 11/8/05, Michael Shipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digital wrote:Hey Folks -We've been talking about ease of use in aggregation and I keep hearingabout Flash. Isn't there an open source solution like java that can dothis? I would think the install base should be the same or
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ronenwastaken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lots of people gave me links, but then the chat closed and ALAS, they
pulled a kaiser soze
so if anyone who gave me a link can post it here, or email me,
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I'd appreciate it
R
Go to the
On 11/8/05, Michael Shipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flash gets mentioned because the penetration rate is somewhere around
97% of all web browsers. Most likely, any web-based aggregators will go
with Flash for video.
On the other hand, Java's penatration rate within browsers is unknown
and
Lucas Gonze wrote:
On 11/8/05, Michael Shipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flash gets mentioned because the penetration rate is somewhere around
97% of all web browsers. Most likely, any web-based aggregators will go
with Flash for video.
I/ON looked quite cool when I saw it demo'd.
In
73 matches
Mail list logo
