OK whomever is doing this stop. I am not the author of these emails. Someone has
either cracked my email password (which will be changed right now) or is cleverly
finding a way to put my name and email address in as a little joke.
Adam, are you listening? Do you know how I know it is you?
Adam, are you listening? Do you know how I know it is you? Yes, because
your posts
always show up from the day or two before the current date. I have been
out all
evening and just got home.
Indeed I am (listening, that it). I conceed my computer's date is often out
of synch (despite a new
From: Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:04:08 -0800
The M6260A is a support chip handling
communications for the 8xC154D
MCU. Try 64 pin DIP. If anyone has NEC Manual:
Microprocessor and
Peripheral - Data Book Volume III it probably
contains what I need,
from
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:13:30 -0800
From: Kirk D. Garber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attn: Dave Lee-- Hear, Hear! You tell 'em, Dave!
You know, first, this discussion is on topic because it relates to
getting the LC memory map hacked so that more than 10 MB of RAM can
be used.
Second, it would be a
At 03:45 -0600 on 04/04/03, Jeff Walther wrote:
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:13:30 -0800
From: Kirk D. Garber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attn: Dave Lee-- Hear, Hear! You tell 'em, Dave!
You know, first, this discussion is on topic because it relates to
getting the LC memory map hacked so that more than 10
Hey Joseph, excuse me asshole, but you aren't welcome on a Mac list talking about
your shitty non-mac computer stuff.
Fuck off and get out!
--- Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:15:21 -0600, you wrote:
From: Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003
Hey Gregg, piece of dogshit, get your shit non-Mac discussion off the list!
--- Gregg Eshelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:04:08 -0800
The M6260A is a support chip handling
communications for the 8xC154D
MCU. Try 64 pin
on 4/4/03 10:19 AM, Dave Lee at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List Nanny,
Please make a public announcement that this guy is gone
forever.
Hey Joseph, excuse me asshole, but you aren't welcome on a Mac list talking
about
your
--
America: it's not against the law to be stupid here,
Dearest Dave,
Piss off.
Sincerely,
Terry
This discussion is off topic.
Remember we are talking about the Macintosh here, OK?
Get a clue losers!
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon
At 03:45 -0600 on 04/04/03, Jeff Walther wrote:
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:13:30 -0800
From: Kirk D. Garber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attn: Dave Lee-- Hear, Hear! You tell 'em, Dave!
You know, first, this discussion is on topic because it relates to
getting the LC memory map hacked so that
At 06:22 +1000 on 03/04/03, David Lee wrote:
Oohhh! I'm sorry sir. Please don't use all of your amazing power and
resources to do anything horrible to me, Mr. Pickle!
Please, oh, please! Anything but that! I'm so sorry, please don't be mad at
me! I apologise - please have mercy!
I'll do
At 21:07:42 -0800 on 4/3/03, Dave Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, please take this OFF the list.
It has nothing to do with compact macs.
Isn't there a moderator on this list? Hello?
All this from someone who wanted to use the Quadlist to discuss the
pros and cons of IE for web site design
Oh No! I'm digging my own grave, oh, oh, I think I'm gonna mess up my pants!
Please, I give up, I'm throwing myself upon your mercy! In the name of
humanity, DON'T DO ANYTHING TO ME!!!
Whew, someone get the mop. So, Mr. Pickle, once this hole that I've dug
soo deep caves in on me, exactly
Umm, yeah I did not write this.
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:22 +1000 on 03/04/03, David Lee wrote:
Oohhh! I'm sorry sir. Please don't use all of your amazing power and
resources to do anything horrible to me, Mr. Pickle!
Please, oh, please! Anything but that!
That doesn't explain why a half dozen Mac hackers never came up with
a trivial software solution. If it were doable, it would have been
They don't work for Apple?
Computer hobbyist...geeks...you know the kids that were hacking all
kinds of stuff back then. They would have solved this if it
At 21:23 -0500 on 02/04/03, Robert Gray wrote:
Give a competent programmer with proper equipment a ROM dump and financial
incentive and if this problem is solvable, we'll have it fixed
Thought we were talking trivial software solution here not a small project.
We are. You don't expect someone
At 08:23 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph Davis wrote:
Buy me a Holset HX35 with the 9 cm^2 exhaust housing, and get me the
unobtainium data sheet for the OKI 6260 used circa 1990, and we'll
talk.
You mean like one of these?
http://msvorinich.itgo.com/Jan0703.html
eBay says rebuilt HX-35s are about
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:15:21 -0600, you wrote:
From: Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:04:08 -0800
Did ST Microelectronics make a compatible processor? If you're not=20
sure, is the 6260 a 20 pin, 8 bit microcontroller or processor?=20
The M6260A is a support chip
Guys, please take this OFF the list. It has nothing to do with compact macs. I
could care less about your little stories of NEC AIC whatever. Email each other
privately but don't broadcast your little conversatons.
Isn't there a moderator on this list? Hello?
Thanks,
Dave
The M6260A is
Hi,
Could somebody please explain what this thread is about, and how it
relates to Vintage Macs? Thanks!
Rob
At 08:23 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph Davis wrote:
Buy me a Holset HX35 with the 9 cm^2 exhaust housing, and get me the
unobtainium data sheet for the OKI 6260 used circa 1990,
Hey Pickle, I can't remember what model of the compact mac the HX-35 is. Clue me in
will you? Or get a clue yourself, maybe the HX-35 is not a compact mac?!
H.
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:23 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph Davis wrote:
Buy me a Holset HX35 with the 9 cm^2
I agree. Guys, get it off the list. I'm tired of wading through all your crap.
--- Robert Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody please explain what this thread is about, and how it
relates to Vintage Macs? Thanks!
Rob
At 08:23 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph
This discussion is off topic.
Remember we are talking about the Macintosh here, OK?
Get a clue losers!
--- Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:47:57 -0500, you wrote:
At 08:23 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph Davis wrote:
Buy me a Holset HX35 with the 9 cm^2 exhaust
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:07:42 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
Guys, please take this OFF the list. It has nothing to do with compact macs. I
could care less about your little stories of NEC AIC whatever. Email each other
privately but don't broadcast your little conversatons.
Isn't there a moderator
Attn: Dave Lee-- Hear, Hear! You tell 'em, Dave!
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:09:19 -0800 (PST) Dave Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I agree. Guys, get it off the list. I'm tired of wading through
all your crap.
--- Robert Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody
From what I've seen in the Faq's, etc., apparently there Isn't a
moderator on this list!
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:45:22 -0800 Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:07:42 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
Guys, please take this OFF the list. It has nothing to do with
compact
At 01:51 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph Davis wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:28:53 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give a competent programmer with proper equipment a
ROM dump and financial
incentive and if this problem is solvable, we'll
have it fixed inside of a
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:53:26 -0500, you wrote:
At 01:51 -0800 on 02/04/03, Joseph Davis wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:28:53 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give a competent programmer with proper equipment a
ROM dump and financial
incentive and if this problem
From: Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:23:43 -0800
Name your price ;)
Buy me a Holset HX35 with the 9 cm^2 exhaust housing, and get me the
unobtainium data sheet for the OKI 6260 used circa 1990, and we'll
talk.
Did ST Microelectronics make a compatible processor? If
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:30:50 -0600, you wrote:
From: Joseph Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:23:43 -0800
Name your price ;)
Buy me a Holset HX35 with the 9 cm^2 exhaust housing, and get me the
unobtainium data sheet for the OKI 6260 used circa 1990, and we'll
talk.
Did ST
At 00:09:08 -0500 on 4/1/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 00:06 -0500 on 01/04/03, Robert Gray wrote:
At 07:43:41 -0500 on 3/31/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:42 -0500 on 31/03/03, Robert Gray wrote:
I was thinking about something along the lines of...MODE32...
a little file
At 21:28 -0500 on 01/04/03, Robert Gray wrote:
That doesn't explain why a half dozen Mac hackers never came up with
a trivial software solution. If it were doable, it would have been
They don't work for Apple?
You'd think someone could write a browser for System 6, too, but nobody's done
that
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give a competent programmer with proper equipment a
ROM dump and financial
incentive and if this problem is solvable, we'll
have it fixed inside of a
week. Finding the competent programmer is going to
be the difficult (read: impossible) part.
Naw,
At 19:28 -0800 on 01/04/03, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give a competent programmer with proper equipment a
ROM dump and financial
incentive and if this problem is solvable, we'll
have it fixed inside of a
week. Finding the competent programmer is going to
I was thinking about something along the lines of...MODE32...
a little file that you stick in your extensions folder.
If the solution were that trivial,
the question never would have come up. :-)
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronics
At 22:53 -0600 on 30/03/03, Jeff Walther wrote:
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:42:13 -0500
From: the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:27 -0500 on 30/03/03, Dan Knight wrote:
Sonnet has come out with a patch. It's part of a PDS card that includes a
33 MHz '040 CPU, ethernet, and 32 MB additional
At 07:42 -0500 on 31/03/03, Robert Gray wrote:
I was thinking about something along the lines of...MODE32...
a little file that you stick in your extensions folder.
If the solution were that trivial,
the question never would have come up. :-)
What's the bet Connectix might have had something,
At 07:43:41 -0500 on 3/31/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:42 -0500 on 31/03/03, Robert Gray wrote:
I was thinking about something along the lines of...MODE32...
a little file that you stick in your extensions folder.
If the solution were that trivial,
the question never would have
At 00:06 -0500 on 01/04/03, Robert Gray wrote:
At 07:43:41 -0500 on 3/31/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:42 -0500 on 31/03/03, Robert Gray wrote:
I was thinking about something along the lines of...MODE32...
a little file that you stick in your extensions folder.
If the solution were
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
various people wrote
What's the bet Connectix might have had
something, but Apple
didn't want them to release it and bought it off
them?
Conspiracy theory. I like it. :-) Another 200
mpg carburetor.
Any company willing to write the ROMs
For instance, if
a computer has 2 MB on the motherboard and accepts two 4 MB SIMMs (but
nothing larger), there's no reason in the world to create ROMs that can
support more than 10 MB.
There's a huge reason *not* to make a ROM that only supports 10 MB when
it's
clear that larger SIMMs are
At 18:36 +1000 on 30/03/03, dana sibera wrote:
From the (basic) knowledge I have of memory, the number of address lines
(column and row) that are either
physically connected to the simm socket, or even physically available on the
memory controller, comes into play. If the
motherboard doesn't have
On 3/28/03 2:17 PM, Adam posted:
If this limitation is the the ROM thanks to our friends at Apple, and if it
is patchable by someone with the necessary skills, why wouldn't Connectix or
someone come out with such a patch.
I'm sure they would have sold by the truckload.
Sonnet has come out with a
At 10:27 -0500 on 30/03/03, Dan Knight wrote:
Sonnet has come out with a patch. It's part of a PDS card that includes a
33 MHz '040 CPU, ethernet, and 32 MB additional memory.
Ja, but that means it's doable in software.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
I guess my point is: To everyone all over the world who advocates the
continuing use of vintage Macs, scratch cheap FTP server off the
list of practical uses.
You should qualify that with 'cheap FTP server *in MacOS*' -- if you slap your
favourite Unix on it, voila, you have a cheap FTP
At 08:21 +1000 on 31/03/03, Adam wrote:
Sonnet has come out with a patch. It's part of a PDS card that includes a
33 MHz '040 CPU, ethernet, and 32 MB additional memory.
Ja, but that means it's doable in software.
--
Does it? I'm not completely convinced that being able to do this with an
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:42:13 -0500
From: the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:27 -0500 on 30/03/03, Dan Knight wrote:
Sonnet has come out with a patch. It's part of a PDS card that includes a
33 MHz '040 CPU, ethernet, and 32 MB additional memory.
Ja, but that means it's doable in software.
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:27 -0500 on 30/03/03, Dan Knight wrote:
Sonnet has come out with a patch. It's part of a
PDS card that includes a
33 MHz '040 CPU, ethernet, and 32 MB additional
memory.
Ja, but that means it's doable in software.
Depends on how the Sonnet
I mean, as many people as I hear make the suggestion to turn that
antique Mac into an FTP server, you'd think there would be plenty of
solutions that don't require a non-standard OS- or at least ONE...
There's always NCSA Telnet. It's not a very robust or buff FTP server,
but it works and it
On 3/26/03 3:30 PM, Jeff Walther posted:
From: Fletch Brendan Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need a third choice, I would actually suggest an LC (not an LC
II or III), even though LowEndMac declared it a Road Apple. Though it
is essentially a repackaging of the Mac II (it has a 68020),
If the LC
At 20:30 -0600 on 29/03/03, Steve Conrad wrote:
I mean, as many people as I hear make the suggestion to turn that
antique Mac into an FTP server, you'd think there would be plenty of
solutions that don't require a non-standard OS- or at least ONE...
There's always NCSA Telnet. It's not a very
At 21:24 -0500 on 29/03/03, Dan Knight wrote:
On 3/26/03 3:30 PM, Jeff Walther posted:
From: Fletch Brendan Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need a third choice, I would actually suggest an LC (not an LC
II or III), even though LowEndMac declared it a Road Apple. Though it
is essentially a
Speaking of all this- who can point me to some free software I can
use to run such an FTP server using a IIci running System 7?
Heck, forget free-- can someone point me to ANY software that'll let
me run an FTP server on a IIci? I spent a good while at Version
Tracker last night, and couldn't
Speaking of all this- who can point me to some free software I can
use to run such an FTP server using a IIci running System 7?
Heck, forget free-- can someone point me to ANY software that'll let
me run an FTP server on a IIci? I spent a good while at Version
Tracker last night, and couldn't
If you switch to the free OS NetBSD you'll have a ftpserver for
nothing. Installing it is fairly complicated but an interesting
experience. It works fine on a MacIIci.
I appreciate the suggestion, but I'm already installing MkLinux onto
a 7200... I was really hoping for something simpler on
At 18:15 -0500 on 28/03/03, Fletch Brendan Good wrote:
If you switch to the free OS NetBSD you'll have a ftpserver for
nothing. Installing it is fairly complicated but an interesting
experience. It works fine on a MacIIci.
I appreciate the suggestion, but I'm already installing MkLinux onto
a
I mean, as many people as I hear make the suggestion to turn that
antique Mac into an FTP server, you'd think there would be plenty of
solutions that don't require a non-standard OS- or at least ONE...
There's always NCSA Telnet. It's not a very robust or buff FTP server,
but it works and it
At 16:59 -0800 on 28/03/03, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
I mean, as many people as I hear make the suggestion to turn that
antique Mac into an FTP server, you'd think there would be plenty of
solutions that don't require a non-standard OS- or at least ONE...
There's always NCSA Telnet. It's not a
I mean, as many people as I hear make the suggestion to turn that
antique Mac into an FTP server, you'd think there would be plenty of
solutions that don't require a non-standard OS- or at least ONE...
There's always NCSA Telnet. It's not a very robust or buff FTP server,
but it
Might find something on http://mac.tucows.com
=
Why do Zik-Zak Burgers come in plastic packs? Some of the plastic rubs off on them
and increases their nutritional value! Max Headroom
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March
--- Cameron Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I mean, as many people as I hear make the
suggestion to turn that
antique Mac into an FTP server, you'd think there
would be plenty of
solutions that don't require a non-standard OS- or
at least ONE...
There's always NCSA Telnet. It's not
--- Jeff Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clip
So, someone sneak on over to Apple and appropriate
those files, okay?
And while you're there get the Bandit and Hammerhead
designs too, would you?
Don't forget the Mr. Clean 32bit clean ROMs for the
SE/30, Mac II etc. that Apple used for
[Slamming Apple for the way they developed their line
of computers and for not providing expandability.]
I think Apple knew what they were doing. For every geek there are
probably 30 users who just want to do a little word processing, send
some email, surf the web, and maybe make a bithday
I have an LCIII I am trying to decide what to use for...
Dave
Make yourself a nice Email or FTP server (if an FTP server is the way you
go you can make us mac fans yet another site to find software).
Steve
Steve Conrad
810 Main
Henrietta, MO 64036
816-494-5692
Don't I need some kind of static-IP address for that? I don't think Concast Cable
Internet offers that.
--- Steve Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an LCIII I am trying to decide what to use for...
Dave
Make yourself a nice Email or FTP server (if an FTP server is the way you
go
Don't I need some kind of static-IP address for that? I don't think
Concast Cable Internet offers that.
You can use a service like dyndns.org or no-ip.com to redirect people
to your FTP or web server when you have a dynamic IP address. I think
it might involve using a browser to log into their
At 10:17 -0800 on 27/03/03, Dave Lee wrote:
Don't I need some kind of static-IP address for that? I don't think Concast
Cable
Internet offers that.
You definitely don't need static IPs for it, but you might want a Dynamic DNS
client.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
I think Apple knew what they were doing. For every geek there are
probably 30 users who just want to do a little word processing, send
some email, surf the web, and maybe make a bithday card for grandma.
They buy a computer, use for several machine-generation, and aren't
the least bit
--- Jeff Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wooo. I wouldn't go on about this so much, but
this is a pet peeve
of mine about Apple. They release models that are
handicapped
beyond the requirements of any cost savings.By
that, I mean that
for the same money, and using pretty much
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which says to me patch it!
There *has* to be a way to patch that ROM in
software to get around the
limitation. Even if it only allowed the use of
low-profile 16 MB SIMMs, that
would more than triple the current RAM cap and make
the LC and LC II a
At 02:05 -0800 on 26/03/03, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which says to me patch it!
There *has* to be a way to patch that ROM in
software to get around the
limitation. Even if it only allowed the use of
low-profile 16 MB SIMMs, that
would more than triple
I know many people who would run right out and slap the
money down for a G4/Dual G4 with AGP Pro and six or
more PCI slots, no matter what it cost, because
that is what they want.
I'd buy one in a New York minute. I'm already nearly out of slots on my
dual 1.25GHz G4.
To bring this back on
Speaking of the topic of expandability, I also find it downright maddening
how Apple continues bottlenecking the expandability options. The first Mac
I ever even saw in person was the Grape iMac(I'm serious, we used TRS80s and
DOS PCs when I was in school), and I hated it because, where was I
Anyway, don't dishonor the Mac II, which was a fine machine for its
day, by saying that the LC is a close relative. :-)
OK, OK, I see that I deserved that, at least to some extent, for
having made the mistake of closely comparing the LC and the II. I was
paraphrasing Everymac.com and some
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:26:56 -0500
From: Fletch Brendan Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LC Road Apple; Was: Re: new 68k for Dad
Anyway, don't dishonor the Mac II, which was a fine machine for its
day, by saying that the LC is a close relative. :-)
OK, OK, I see that I deserved
At 15:30 -0500 03/26/2003, Vintage Macs wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:18:07 -0500
From: the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the ROM was simply coded to ignore the extra RAM, the patching is trivial.
Hmmm. I wonder if there's any way to squeeze the IIsi ROM in there
and see what happens...
If
--- Jeff Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My objection is
that Apple built machines that sucked a lot more than they had to for
the same cost in parts. A simple change to the LC would be to get
rid of the memory limitation. That would not increase the cost.
Adding a 32 bit data path
--- Jeff Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. I wonder if there's any way to squeeze the IIsi ROM in there
and see what happens...
IIsi ROMs can be placed inside SE/30s to make them 32 bit clean. I don't know if
the LC
has socketed ROM. I have an LCIII I am trying to decide what to use
At 19:42 -0600 on 26/03/03, Jeff Walther wrote:
At 15:30 -0500 03/26/2003, Vintage Macs wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:18:07 -0500
From: the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the ROM was simply coded to ignore the extra RAM, the patching is trivial.
Hmmm. I wonder if there's any way to squeeze the
--- Fletch Brendan Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
clip
And you know, I
just noticed that
the IIfx itself is a one-bullet Road Apple- at the
same time they
rated it a Best Buy! Go figure.
That's because of the funky 64pin SIMMs and the fact
that the PDS is useless unless you stumble onto a
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:46:52 -0500
From: Fletch Brendan Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new 68k for Dad
If you need a third choice, I would actually suggest an LC (not an LC
II or III), even though LowEndMac declared it a Road Apple. Though it
is essentially a repackaging of the Mac II (it
.
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB. The LC goes
up to 10 MB.What's up with that? It's not even a power of 2.
Apple must have done something seriously stupid in the ROM and/or the
memory map, because that's not the kind of number you're likely to
get from a
At 03:50 +1000 on 25/03/03, Adam wrote:
.
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB. The LC goes
up to 10 MB.What's up with that? It's not even a power of 2.
Apple must have done something seriously stupid in the ROM and/or the
memory map, because that's not the kind of
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB. The LC goes
up to 10 MB.
snip
The 10Mb RAM limit was deliberately programmed into the LC's ASICs.
Which says to me patch it!
There *has* to be a way to patch that ROM in software to get around the
limitation.
That would rock,
At 04:05 +1000 on 25/03/03, Adam wrote:
That would rock, but, is the limitation actually programmed into the ROM? Or
is it built into the memory controller or some other inaccessable location?
No one really knows for sure, but I suspect the ROM.
--
the pickle
FAQ http://macfaq.org/index.shtml
85 matches
Mail list logo
