At 12:08 PM 10/1/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
From: BUSHNELL
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:55:10 -0500
To: Steven Krivit
Subject: Request
Put in your Blog.
My "well done" remark referred to the accuracy of your reporting of
my quotes from the GRC meeting. Period. Was not referring to the
veracit
On 2011-09-30 11:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
It could mean different things depending on the reader's point of view,
in my opinion.
Daniele Passerini got permission to post the following reply from
Bushnell to Krivit in his blog. He added it in a comment in this link,
but I think he eventuall
On 2011-09-30 18:15, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
luke (luca) says:
September 30, 2011 at 14:12
[...]
Given the wording of this comment, if Krivit forgets to post Bushnell's
answer, that could be erroneously interpreted as his confirmation that
the tests were not positive.
User "luke (luka)" sho
At 05:26 AM 9/30/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, Dennis Bushnell is Krivit's
acolyte? Received via e-mail:
Well done, as usual. Look forward to your reporting of the upcoming
Rossi tests.
Dennis Bushnell
luke (luca) says:
September 30, 2011 at 14:12
Dr. Bushnell you are going on the record
So, Dennis Bushnell is Krivit's acolyte?
2011/9/30 Akira Shirakawa
> On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
>
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here:
>>
>
> This has been posted in the comments section. I'm assuming the email is
> authentic:
>
> Received via e-
On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello Group,
Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here:
This has been posted in the comments section. I'm assuming the email is
authentic:
Received via e-mail:
“Well done, as usual. Look forward to your reporting of the upcoming Rossi
tests
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Rossi wrote:
WE WILL MEASURE THE ENERGY TAKING THE DELTA T OF THE WATER, THE
WATER, THE WATER, NOT OF THE STEAM NOT OF THE STEAM, NOT OF THE
STEAM, THEREFORE THE ISSUE OF THE QUALITY OF THE STEAM HAS
ABSOLUTELY NOT IMPORTANCE, BECAURE WE D
Terry seZ:
...
> Krivit is certainly causing a reaction within Rossi. AAMOF, it
> appears to me that AR is on the verge of a meltdown.
>
> Do you notice a hint of desperation in AR's writings of late?
LOL. I completely missed the original joke. ...er the joke is on me.
Regards
Steven Vincent J
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:32 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
> From: Michele Comitini
>
>> All bets are off. The catalyst that ignites Rossi's powerful
>> hot reactions is now well known and proven: KrIvIt.
>
> Really? Good heavens! I missed that little tidbit.
>
> Can you cite refe
Hi,
On 29-9-2011 16:21, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Nevertheless, Rossi continuing to describe Krivit as a "snake" is not
doing himself any favors. IMO, to constantly reveal such an incredibly
raw emotional side of himself to the general public, particularly in
the midst of trying to co
Am 29.09.2011 19:12, schrieb OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson:
From Peter Heckert& S. V. Johnson
When I was still a BoD member for Krivit's NET
organization his "sponser(s)", at least during the
time when I was still a BoD, seemed pretty independently-
minded to me. I could be wrong, but I doubt
>From Peter Heckert & S. V. Johnson
>> When I was still a BoD member for Krivit's NET
>> organization his "sponser(s)", at least during the
>> time when I was still a BoD, seemed pretty independently-
>> minded to me. I could be wrong, but I doubt Krivit's
>> sponsorship [I meant sponser(s)] would
Am 29.09.2011 17:29, schrieb OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson:
From Peter:
...
There seems to (hostile) competition between Piantelli
group and Rossi. Krivit in his website gives the
impression to be independent, but his "sponsor" is
unknown and he seems to prefer the piantelli group
over others
>From Peter:
...
> There seems to (hostile) competition between Piantelli
> group and Rossi. Krivit in his website gives the
> impression to be independent, but his "sponsor" is
> unknown and he seems to prefer the piantelli group
> over others.
You seem to be speculating, and therefore insinuat
On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello Group,
More from Rossi on NASA:
1) How is it going with the 1MW plant? is it completed?
2) Did you invited people from NASA to the October 6th test?
3) Is NASA the big customer of your first 1MW plant?
Dear Alessandro Casali:
1- It will be
- Original Nachricht
Von: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 29.09.2011 16:21
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news)
> Nevertheless, Rossi continuing to describe Krivit as a "snake" is not
> doing hi
Nevertheless, Rossi continuing to describe Krivit as a "snake" is not
doing himself any favors. IMO, to constantly reveal such an incredibly
raw emotional side of himself to the general public, particularly in
the midst of trying to convince others as to the accuracy of his
controversial scientific
Rossi wrote:
WE WILL MEASURE THE ENERGY TAKING THE DELTA T OF THE WATER, THE
WATER, THE WATER, NOT OF THE STEAM NOT OF THE STEAM, NOT OF THE
STEAM, THEREFORE THE ISSUE OF THE QUALITY OF THE STEAM HAS ABSOLUTELY
NOT IMPORTANCE, BECAURE WE DO NOT MEASURE THE ENERGY FROM THE STEAM
!!! WE COU
From: Michele Comitini
> All bets are off. The catalyst that ignites Rossi's powerful
> hot reactions is now well known and proven: KrIvIt.
Really? Good heavens! I missed that little tidbit.
Can you cite references or links that describe Rossi's secret sauce?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Rega
All bets are off. The catalyst that ignites Rossi's powerful hot reactions
is now well known and proven: KrIvIt.
mic
2011/9/29 Akira Shirakawa
> On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
>
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here:
>>
>
> This is Rossi's rebuttal:
>
On 2011-09-28 20:00, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello Group,
Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here:
This is Rossi's rebuttal:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=9#comment-83748
WARNING:
THE SNAKE HAS WRITTEN IN HIS BLOG THAT NASA MADE A NOT POSITIVE TEST WITH US.
TH
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Robert Leguillon
wrote:
> But, he only really achieved stability when it
> WASN'T WORKING. By failing to do proper calorimetry and use proper
> controls, he'd fooled himself into thinking it's running smoothly when it
> isn't running at all.
I agree that this is
My two cents:
As was previously theorized, Rossi may have really been onto something.
Unfortunately, when the reaction occurs, it is difficult to keep stable; it
runs away and needs to be quenched. If you recall, the Defkalion rumors
centered around a nonpayment from Defkalion until Rossi a
23 matches
Mail list logo