Wow. Please forgive me if you haven't seen Dr. Edmund Storms video
interview, but that was one the most convincing theoretical arguments for
as type of fracto-fusion cold fusion event I've seen. It makes perfect
sense. I've studied enough electron-micrographs to know that the type of
disloca
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Emeka Okafor wrote:
> A. Xaaq -- zq q
>
> Sent from my iPhone
I guess it's more than the mapping s/w, eh?
A. Xaaq -- zq q
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
> Oustanding work Ruby.
>
> Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to. Sorry, I am
> not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.
>
> Jojo
>
> PS: I will w
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:33:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
>iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
See below?
>
>Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
>
>2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = i
It seems that Ed Storms is not the first worker to speculate about the
important roll that cracks play in cold fusion. I ran into another. Here is
what Kenneth Shoulders says in this reference
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/mar2/fox.htm
about cracks in palladium:
*"It is possible that many
Having a neutrino detector in your lab would be quite an undertaking. The
"small" one in Sudbury is 40 feet in diameter and full of D2O. Back of the
envelope, I make its weight about 1000 metric tons (which is about 2.2
million pounds for metrically-challenged people).
Jeff
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 a
This video is a good summary of the last evolutions of Edmund Storm's
theory. Thank you, Edmund and Ruby to make it happen.
I've a bit of concern regarding neutrino emission. Edmund said that no
neutrino has been seen and his theory explains it why. That's good point.
Nevertheless he has conduc
itz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* samedi 25 août 2012 20:11
> *To:* arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be
> *Cc:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
> (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
>
>
> ** **
>
> Jus
Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
(Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
Just out of curiosity, does the "Thermite reaction" work with nickel, i.e.
something like ... Fe2O3 + 3 Ni => 3 NiO + 2 Fe?
Jeff
catalyst … What is the isotopic quantities found in the
> ash from Rossi?
>
> ** **
>
> Arnaud
> --
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* samedi 25 août 2012 06:33
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> *Subject
: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
(Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
2 + 26 = 28 nickel - h
10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message
Le Aug 24, 2012 à 11:46 AM, Jed Rothwell a écrit :
> That would include transmuting deuterium into tritium, by the way.
This is always a possibility, of course. But I think it would require either a
transition from D to 3He and then a very slow inverse beta decay, or,
alternatively, some kind
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:09:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
>level gammas?
Prompt gammas are not a problem, because they can be absorbed and converted to
heat immediately. It's radioactive nuclei produc
Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
level gammas?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent
> >t
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
>to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
>reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ruby wrote:
>
> An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.
Like I said in my private message, what's an order of magnitude error
among friends?
I also edited the DGT post but it won't reappear until the moderators
approve the edit.
T
An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.
I HAD to upload a fresh vid, couldn't get the tweak right in Youtube
Storms interview UPDATED video link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNodilc6su0
Getting to the youtube, most people will be able to find it.
Woo hoo - the
Kelley Trezise wrote:
**
> In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
> one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
> little in the way of net heat out . . .
>
As far as I know, they contribute far less energy than the deuterium
reactions.
Perhaps of relevance is the H-Chain modeling described in this paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1746v1.pdf
The homogeneous (i.e., equispaced), linear, and peri-
odic chain of Hydrogen atoms (hereafter, the H-chain) is
commonly believed to be the simplest physical system de-
scribed by the one-ban
t; From: Axil Axil
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions
> (Cold Fusion) by Edmund Storms
>
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
> to w
Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of Low-energy Nuclear Reactions (Cold
Fusion) by Edmund Storms
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent to
what Rossi
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:23 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
> Well, no, it’s not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
> MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
> test to satisfy the Collective!
That could be cruel, unusual, possibly perpetual punishment
I agree with Frank.
I will only add that a local STRONG QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL FORCE can also
red-shift any energy that escapes its grasp, resulting in weak radiation to
outside observers. It also has the advantage of creating collective, high
energy blue-shifted radiation near the SOURCE of quant
Ed's theory can not explain the lack of radiation. The ONLY way a nuclear
reaction can proceed without producing radiation is in the case where the range
of the strong nuclear force exceeds that of the coulombic.
Ed start by assuming that the range of the force fields is not a conserved
pro
Oustanding work Ruby.
Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to. Sorry, I am
not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.
Jojo
PS: I will write some opinions about this video in my thread. I did not want
to interject my ideas here so as not to pol
Ruby Carat wrote:
". and I'm going to send any individuals interested in discussing the work
here to this thread. Is that illegal on Vortex?"
Well, no, it's not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
test to s
I will ask them, DGTG analytical studies need much work,
anyway they see transmutation and nucleosynthesis.
Very solid and reliable data, still far from complete interpretation.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
> is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?
is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?
2012/8/24 Axil Axil
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products.
> These reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and s
And it is also not consistent with the Defkalion analyses.
It is a complex issue.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
> to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
> reaction
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
Yes, Rossi's info
31 matches
Mail list logo