"Todd Allen" wrote in message
news:2a34d5a90902162103lfd8202fmcbe76978816f2...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
>> "Todd Allen" wrote in message
>> news:2a34d5a90902152157k5534f173g83c5c67ad6f83...@mail.gmail.com...
>> regarding http://www.fractint.org/
>>
Carcharoth wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
>
>> Carcharoth wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Sam Korn wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/2/16 Alvaro García:
>
>>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> "Todd Allen" wrote in message
> news:2a34d5a90902152157k5534f173g83c5c67ad6f83...@mail.gmail.com...
> regarding http://www.fractint.org/
> (...)
>> If the intent of the license is "We could force someone to pay for
>> distribution rights at som
"Todd Allen" wrote in message
news:2a34d5a90902152157k5534f173g83c5c67ad6f83...@mail.gmail.com...
regarding http://www.fractint.org/
(...)
> If the intent of the license is "We could force someone to pay for
> distribution rights at some point and deny them those rights if they
> don't pay up", i
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Carcharoth wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Sam Korn wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Dalton
>>> wrote:
>>>
2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
> Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't
Carcharoth wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Sam Korn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Dalton
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
>>>
Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't paid?
>>> No... the "free" part sho
Oh Oh Oh sorry!!!
Gratis.
That happens to me when I do two things at the same time.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:15, Nathan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Alvaro García wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that was what I meant. That when 'free' is used along with
> > 'ware', it's because it's free (li
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Alvaro García wrote:
> Yeah, that was what I meant. That when 'free' is used along with
> 'ware', it's because it's free (libre).
>
>
> --
> Alvaro
>
You've just contradicted yourself - you were right the first time.
Nathan
__
Yeah, that was what I meant. That when 'free' is used along with
'ware', it's because it's free (libre).
--
Alvaro
On 16-02-2009, at 10:50, Sam Korn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Dalton > wrote:
>> 2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
>>> Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Sam Korn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Dalton
> wrote:
>> 2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
>>> Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't paid?
>>
>> No... the "free" part shows that. The "ware" part shows that it's software...
>
> But
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
>> Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't paid?
>
> No... the "free" part shows that. The "ware" part shows that it's software...
But, generally, yes: "freeware" means free-gratis, not free-libre
2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
> Oh, but what I mean is that "freeware" means "free (gratis) software", not
> "free (libre) software"
Indeed, it does.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https:
Oh, but what I mean is that "freeware" means "free (gratis) software", not
"free (libre) software"
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:47, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
> > Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't paid?
>
> No... the "free" part shows that. The "ware"
2009/2/16 Alvaro García :
> Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't paid?
No... the "free" part shows that. The "ware" part shows that it's software...
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this ma
Doesn't the -ware suffix only show that the software isn't paid?
--
Alvaro
On 16-02-2009, at 2:57, Todd Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
>> That's the description of the license on the software from
>> http://www.fractint.org/ (requires a FAT32 partition under
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> That's the description of the license on the software from
> http://www.fractint.org/ (requires a FAT32 partition under Windows XP, BTW.
> You might need another hard drive or a partition resizer to save anything
> from it).
>
> The following tex
Copyrighted Freeware should mean that. It's free, but you may not
modify and release it, nor copy it, etc. Just a normal Copyright.
--
Alvaro
On 09-02-2009, at 21:50, "Jay Litwyn" wrote:
> That's the description of the license on the software from
> http://www.fractint.org/ (requires a FAT32
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
That's the description of the license on the software from
http://www.fractint.org/ (requires a FAT32 partition under Windows XP, BTW.
You might need another hard drive or a partition resizer to save anything
from it).
The only things that are
That's the description of the license on the software from
http://www.fractint.org/ (requires a FAT32 partition under Windows XP, BTW.
You might need another hard drive or a partition resizer to save anything
from it).
The following text is probably not as cogent or understandable as just
gett
19 matches
Mail list logo
