I would go licensed backhauls and save all the unlicensed spectrum for pmp.
That way you have a bunch of different tools to use for the last mile.
Start with a couple backhauls each year and work your way out...you'll be
glad you did.
Also 5.4ghz is very useful because the noise floor is almost
It may come to that, but all of our back haul
links are 5 GHz and it was always intended to be
kept 'clean' for this purpose. If we could count
on using the 3.65 GHz for backhaul it would mean
switching the links on ~20 towers but help us get out of the 2.4 GHz mess.
Daniel
At 00:43 01.08.20
Why don't you use PMP450 in 5ghz?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Daniel Mullen mailto:wi...@metrocom.ca>>
Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:22 PM
To: WISPA General List mai
If this helps:
We are in Canada - spectrum license time: one week. Effort: one page letter.
There are three 900 MHz Canopy sectors and an
omni serving at least 24 customers who are now on 2.4 GHz Canopy.
Currently the backhaul is on 5 GHz but this will
need to change to support a ~300 Mbps l
I agree. We used to have a bunch of 3.65 Ubnt deployed in PTMP. I have
removed almost all of it after being unable to maintain stable performance.
If you are going to use it, keep connections pure line of sight and keep
all AMQ and Capacity above 90%. Also don't install anyone over -66dbm
signa
No... I won't buy if if it does not support gps sync. Specially 3.65 and the
limited spectrum
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Jul 31, 2013, at 12:16 PM, "Josh Luthman"
wrote:
> Gino won't buy it unless it has batwings or costs at least 4 digits per SU.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-5
What kind of issues have you seen? We only have a few running, but they
seem to be fine.
Matt Hoppes
Director of Information Technology
Indigo Wireless
+1 (570) 723-7312
On 7/31/13 12:32 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
> I have to agree with Gino. I have not had much luck with M365 PTMP setup.
> PT
We've haven't had much luck with our UBNT 365 ptmp setups either. Not
that they're horrible but it's not giving us optimal performance. Also
don't think that you're going to make shots through a grove of trees
because it's not going to work. "A" tree maybe but you're pushing it.
I've got a neighbor
I have to agree with Gino. I have not had much luck with M365 PTMP setup. PTP
is fine but you only have 25MHz to use.
Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCSWIN.com
Howard LLC.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Matt Hoppes
Se
Hey it could work...
Why are you replacing the gear?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
> Don't do it...
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> g...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband C
Use NSM365 with a dish on all but the shortest links.
Keep distances short, 4 miles or less.
AMQ above 80%
TX CCQ above 75%
RX level or -70 or better
AMQ, TX CCQ, & RX level must ALL be at or above those values.
Keep SM counts below 45 or so.
Use KP Performance antennas or Ubiquiti antennas
Gino won't buy it unless it has batwings or costs at least 4 digits per SU.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Matt Hoppes
wrote:
> Don't do it?? Where'd that come from.
>
> There's really only two mo
Don't do it?? Where'd that come from.
There's really only two models of CPEs in the 3.65 world... the
NanoStation and the NanoBridge. The NanoStation will be good for about
a mile clear line of site. The NanoBridge will be good a few miles out,
and perhaps closer with a small obstruction (bu
Depends on the roof material.
Such a rig on the ~100year old wood/tarpaper roofs here in St. Louis would
probably cause a depression to form under the bucket. This is why I have
to use rather wide base under the cinderblocks, to spread the load across a
couple rafters.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:
Don't do it...
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:01 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
The problem is not the ATT offer, it's ATT Marketing and the consumers who
mostly are uninformed...
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Ro
Thanks for the close up. I think I will go with this design as I can get
all of those parts locally. I like the wide base, to distribute weight more
evenly.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Ben West wrote:
> If you need, here is a close up of that 3foot tripod screwed down to the
> treated lumb
We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week to take existing customers off of
an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system.
Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz gear from Ubnt and could recommend
which model of CPE and if there anything to know to avoid a steep 'learning
curve' since we have never
We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week to take existing customers off of
an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system.
Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz gear from Ubnt and could recommend
which model of CPE and if there anything to know to avoid a steep 'learning
curve' since we have never
This means that for our average $45/month customer who uses on average
30 Gigs they could pay $120 instead Wow the POWER of AT*T
(not!)
On 07/29/2013 05:28 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
> AT&T Launches LTE powered Home Internet and Phone Service in selected
> markets
>
>
>
> http://ow
How about using a 5 gallon bucket and concrete a 5 ft pole into it. Lowes
bucket = $5.00, bag of concrete = $3.73, and a 1 ½ EMT conduit = $12.00. All
parts for less than $25.00
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Joshua Zukerman
Sent: Tuesday, J
21 matches
Mail list logo
