Yup... same here. OSPF does not work with anything but WDS.
Travis
Microserv
Justin Wilson wrote:
> I have seen Pseudobridge on the Mikrotik side give OSPF issues. For the
> customer side no issues. But with OSPF and pseudobridge you have duplicate
> Mac addresses due to the nature of how i
: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Pseudobridge has tested to perform almost exactly the same as Station mode.
It does NOT have the same slowness side effects as WDS.
For us, it looks like pseduobridge might work for us for the client side,
because we dont use
SPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
> Have you tested pseudobridge to achieve a similar affect without WDS?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net]
> Sent: 28 April 2010 01:41
> To: WISPA General List
> Subje
Have you tested pseudobridge to achieve a similar affect without WDS?
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net]
Sent: 28 April 2010 01:41
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Yes, WDS adds
esults..
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry"
To: "wireless"
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
> He
-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net]
Sent: 27 April 2010 05:34
To: wa4...@arrl.net; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
Yes. We let and encourage all our customers to pick their own routers (so
they are liable for their
Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Ihnen"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
>I don't know about the newer "M" line but I know before that
Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Leon D. Zetekoff"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
> On 04/26/2010 08:12 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
>> Are you bridging at the AP and CPE,
, April 26, 2010 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
FWIW...
The Ubiquiti Rocket M's are SBC, running Linux/ Open-wrt, and have the
following processor... on them...
-
Atheros MIPS 24KC, 400MHz
Memory Information 64MB SDRAM, 8MB Flash
Um Yeah. Kinda thought the same thing...
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
> I'm very
OS on my Ubiquity CPE's
>
> Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>What ad luck did you have with the mikrotik cards, and also what model
> card did you use? I only use the R5H from them.
>
>
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>WAVELINC
>P.O. Box 126
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
>
>
On 04/26/2010 08:12 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> Are you bridging at the AP and CPE, and does it work?
>
> Something something that was brought to my attention is that UBQT has Iperf
> built in at teh command line. So technically, if we used UBQT at the CPE and
> MT as AP, we could still do speed tes
OSPF does not like Proxy ARP, hence the WDS requirement. I have not
turned on multicast when doing this.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> On 26 April 2010 20:28, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> It seems to bridge ok, but I primarily NAT the customers.
>>
>> I've read reports it doesn
al Message -
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
>
>
> I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with th
On 26 April 2010 20:28, Josh Luthman wrote:
> It seems to bridge ok, but I primarily NAT the customers.
>
> I've read reports it doesn't carry OSPF packets right.
It seems to behave ok if you do WDS AP/WDS Client and enable Multicast.
uthman"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
>
>
> I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with them.
>
> I do lose the speed test
band
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs. Been very happy with them.
I do lose the
t; RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards
ates a new reocurring cost to have colocated.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad
> card did you use? I only use the R5H from them.
>
>
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>WAVELINC
>P.O. Box 126
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
>419-562-6405
>www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
OOPs. I just looked at your pictures, and see you were using R5H mmcx single
antenna port cards, properly terminating Nconnectors, and thick pigtails.
Clearly there is no better way to test accurately than how you tested. That
is a big surprise, and valuable to know.
Would still be interested
ral List'"
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
> Kurt,
>
> I always put laminated foil between the cards. You able to try putting a
> shield of aluminum foil between to see if that does anything
---
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards inter
3' and a metal enclosure.
grin
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Spott"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
> Wow,
>
> So my question would be, w
ay, April
23, 2010 10:27
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Ever wonder
how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
I'd love to see the same test
with ubiquity XR
cards
I've had such bad luck with mikrotik's radio cards I don't use them any
more
Beca
gt; To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
>
> Wow,
>
> So my question would be, what sort of separation is required to keep the
> noise down?
>
> ryan
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Kurt Fankhaus
, April 24, 2010 4:44 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
If you physically move them to anywhere but on top of each other, like the
sides or above or below then the bleed over goes away. So if you mounted
them side by
So what kind of throughput are you getting from that setup?
LOL!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 11:28 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Ever wonder how ba
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Ryan Spott
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 2:21 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
>
> Wow,
>
> So my question would be, what sort of separa
Wow,
So my question would be, what sort of separation is required to keep the
noise down?
ryan
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> If anyone is like me and ever wondered how bad that stacking cards of the
> same band in RB333 or RB433 interfere with each other, well, I f
30 matches
Mail list logo