Re: (313) Francois K

2002-12-17 Thread Brent Kirkwood
It's been mentioned before, but last time he visited us in Detroit, I 
recall about 6 people on the dance floor and maybe 15-20 in the room 
(plus or minus a couple for the bartenders).  Probably not so much 
reason for him to come back, or for anyone to pay him to come back 
unfortunately.  Maybe better/different promotion could solve that?  I 
dono...  I was pretty embarrassed for Detroit.


Brent


On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 12:23 AM, Kookie wrote:

Please just come to Detroit.  If it wasn't for finals, I was going to 
drive

to Toronto to go catch hime last weekend.
I need some Deep House from the master of it.
- Original Message -
From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Detroit 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: (313) Francois K



Francois K on future of Body  Soul/techno/etc:

We're trying to find a proper situation for it to exist, we just 
didn't

wanna continue with what we felt was not the proper atmosphere and
situation for it, Francois says of Body  Soul. But I'm also
involved in a lot of other things, I'm doing a techno tour with 
Derrick

May
- it must be that I'm playing some different stuff (laughs deeply), 
so I

hope that somehow I'm giving a little something to guess or wonder

about,
so that when I do play in Australia, hopefully it might not just be 
as
predictable as one would think. There will be a few surprises thrown 
in

there.









(313) just plainly wrong

2002-12-17 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
http://www.groovetech.com/PhoenixData/SilverStream/Pages/srvltRecMed?SKU=34914







(313) Bent Crayon

2002-12-17 Thread Dennis DeSantis

Anyone here had any experiences ordering vinyl from the Bent Crayon website?

My girlfriend tried this yesterday and after selecting the merchandise 
she wanted and entering her address, she was told that the shipment was 
on its way - but she never entered any credit card info!


Has anyone else had this experience?  Don't tell me they ship COD...


--
Dennis DeSantis
www.dennisdesantis.com



(313) YMO tip

2002-12-17 Thread jbeard
   I know I already mentioned this, but if you're considering catching the YMO 
bug, or are just a bit curious, the best possible introduction to the band is 
to get one of their concert DVDs.  The versions they do of their tracks live 
(especially in the Hurrah concert) have sooo much more energy than their 
albums. You can get most of their classic songs from multiple albums all 
together with the bonus of getting to see their surreal performances and lots 
of cool old synthesizers. 
   As far as the vinyl goes, I'd recommend multiples x infinity, and their S/t. 
 Technodelic sounds much less unique to me (kinda reminds me of Metamatics), 
and rather depressed. 

--





Re: (313) Bent Crayon

2002-12-17 Thread Mxyzptlk
Most of the time I phone John when I want to order from him...it seems like 
website databases are never up to speed, so I find that it's best to give a 
call. I don't think John would ship COD unless he knew you awfully well.


jef



At 07:14 PM 12/16/2002, Dennis DeSantis wrote:

Anyone here had any experiences ordering vinyl from the Bent Crayon website?

My girlfriend tried this yesterday and after selecting the merchandise she 
wanted and entering her address, she was told that the shipment was on its 
way - but she never entered any credit card info!


Has anyone else had this experience?  Don't tell me they ship COD...





Re: (313) recording industry [mp3]

2002-12-17 Thread Jason Hogans
 Hogie: 
Mmm Hmm. I've thought about ways to make a physical recording appealing
 enough to buy. Maybe even making the recording a secondary item bundled
 with something desirable enough to purchase? Limited edition Jason Hogans
 boxers and panties. Or some seriously cool packaging, like Radiohead's
 Amnesiac or Ghostly's Disco Nouveau.
 Jurren:
 that's one way of getting people to buy your music, but do you want to sell
 cd's/vinyl, or do you want to sell your music? why not offer them the chance
 to download your music from a website? sure, not everyone wants to pay for
 downloads, but would those people buy the physical copy?

I hear you. I guess I feel the trouble with that is whether or not some
folks pay for a download, others will not once its out there for the taking.
There's possibly less incentive for paid downloads when you factor in the
sound quality loss of compressed audio. Maybe not though cause paid
downloads are still cheaper than CDs, eh?

The title performing artist could take on a more strict meaning if it
becomes very unprofitable for labels and musicians to release music.
Recordings for free, performance for fee? I had similar ideas about labels
taking on a somewhat different role of a promotional network or something,
still allowing artists to concentrate on their art. But, I doubt it will go
that far 'cause like you said J.B., there are collectors  supporters out
there.

Perhaps we're tripping over nothing  it will be business as usual. There's
quite a few times I've heard something on the web  copped it later.
Technology could ultimately serve as a filter for ass-nasty music. Scenario
1: I heard that on www. so  so and it swallowed, I won't buy it.. Or,
Scenario 2: It was bangin', I need that!. No more hiding behind the shrink
wrap! Could be good. We'll see... So, anybody need some fly underwear?

JPH.



Re: (313) just plainly wrong

2002-12-17 Thread g
what's wrong with the chipmunks branching out?  just because you're so damn
intent on hearing the christmas album at this time of year.

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:05 PM
Subject: (313) just plainly wrong



http://www.groovetech.com/PhoenixData/SilverStream/Pages/srvltRecMed?SKU=349
14







Re: (313) recording industry [mp3]

2002-12-17 Thread Tristan Watkins
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hogans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 list 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: (313) recording industry [mp3]


 Perhaps we're tripping over nothing  it will be business as usual.
There's
 quite a few times I've heard something on the web  copped it later.
 Technology could ultimately serve as a filter for ass-nasty music.
Scenario
 1: I heard that on www. so  so and it swallowed, I won't buy it.. Or,
 Scenario 2: It was bangin', I need that!. No more hiding behind the
shrink
 wrap! Could be good. We'll see...

I find this is already how it works for me. I don't mind spending a lot of
time sifting through Real Audio samples at home, because I find it allows me
to filter out my impulse purchases at the shop. It's never fool-proof, but
with so much amazing music coming out, I will at least make sure I don't
overspend on stuff I don't want, even if I still can't get everything I do
want.

I think the scenario you're describing is pretty accurate. I don't foresee
the death of vinyl any time in the next 10 years, even with Final Scratch
arriving on Mac and gaining acceptance. A couple of years ago people were
heralding the doom of vinyl via new compression formats, and we're still not
seeing them emerge with anywhere near the speed they were predicted. mp4 was
'just around the corner' three or four years ago, if I recall...

If anything, the new encoding technologies are being developed faster for
audiophiles than for piracy, see: SACD and DVD-Audio. But most importantly,
a sizeable chunk of people are still going to seek the thrill of cracking
open that brand new slab of wax, checking out the hidden messages in the
matrices and throwing it on the platter for the first time, booming from
ortofon + technics + crappy mixer + nice speakers.

So, anybody need some fly underwear?

Yes please, unless that's a strange permutation of fly paper. :)

Tristan
=
Text/Mixes: http://phonopsia.tripod.com
Music: http://www.mp313.com
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

New Mix in mp3, 'Live in Iowa City' available for
a short time from http://phonopsia.isoprax.com




(313) microworld live stuff

2002-12-17 Thread philip

okaaayy well i thought i'd just say a few words cos i wasn't around last
week, don't want anyone thinkin i'm a recalcitrant techno snob do i ?

to all the deep space crew - jaime, dave, rosie, phil, tony  james - thanx
a bunch for making us so welcome  looking after us, esp dave, rosie 
phil. cyclone - thanks for the 3D article  thoughtful questions - don't
know how derrick may suddenly became derrick carter but there you go...:^)
sam k - 313er  sometime microworlder - thankyou buddy for all your time
and input and for making it a much more enjoyable experience than if i'd
done it just by myself. i think that one of the best things about making
music is getting to meet cool people - it sure makes all the not so
exciting parts worthwhile. to anyone who tuned in to dark energy on sat
nite, please ignore everything i said, i was TIRED and EMOTIONAL.

coupla things i reckon are worth a squizz - detroit beatdown 2CD is quality
deepness all the way, a real funkfest. also 'day by day' comp on delsin is
real nice too. famous when dead 2 on playhouse is er strange, as you'd
expect. 

later

p



Re: (313) recording industry [mp3]

2002-12-17 Thread g

On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 05:27 PM, Jason Hogans wrote:


The title performing artist could take on a more strict meaning if it
becomes very unprofitable for labels and musicians to release music.
Recordings for free, performance for fee?


fwiw, hawtin has been saying for some time now that this is his opinion 
of where it's going


Perhaps we're tripping over nothing  it will be business as usual. 
There's

quite a few times I've heard something on the web  copped it later.
Technology could ultimately serve as a filter for ass-nasty music.


already is.  the number of records i've purchased in the last 2 years 
that i didn't listen to online first is very, very small




Re: (313) just plainly wrong

2002-12-17 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

You mean this Christmas album?

http://www.groovetech.com/PhoenixData/SilverStream/Pages/srvltRecMed?SKU=34678
http://www.groovetech.com/PhoenixData/SilverStream/Pages/srvltRecMed?SKU=34678


bah humbug!





   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
   To:   313@hyperreal.org, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  12/16/02 07:37 PMcc:  
   
   Subject:  Re: (313) just plainly 
wrong  

   




what's wrong with the chipmunks branching out?  just because you're so damn
intent on hearing the christmas album at this time of year.

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:05 PM
Subject: (313) just plainly wrong



http://www.groovetech.com/PhoenixData/SilverStream/Pages/srvltRecMed?SKU=349

14












(313) microworld live stuff

2002-12-17 Thread Cyclone Wehner

cyclone - thanks for the 3D article  thoughtful questions - don't
 know how derrick may suddenly became derrick carter but there you go...:^)

I haven't seen that yet! That was their subbing, not mine!
They always confuse the Derricks in Sydney press, running each other's
pictures and stuff. I have tried to explain!


Re: (313) Bent Crayon

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Hellige
[Mxyzptlk [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Most of the time I phone John when I want to order from him...it seems like 
 website databases are never up to speed, so I find that it's best to give a 
 call. I don't think John would ship COD unless he knew you awfully well.
 
  jef
 

And knew for sure that you really wanted it. I'm not sure about the
website ordering, as I always called or emailed. But I can tell you
this: bentcrayon is the best there is!

Matt

-- 
Matt Hellige  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://matt.immute.net


(313) keyboards?

2002-12-17 Thread Chana Goodman


can anyone suggest some good quality keyboards for composing electronic 
music as well as practicing basic piano.  I also need info about sound cards 
that might be a good match.



thnx



_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus




Re: (313) Future Sound compilation on Rephlex

2002-12-17 Thread James Bucknell
that'll be the west side remix of the classic 'don't lead me' by house
master baldwin and paris grey. this mix isn't on the original 1987 release
and i've never come across a copy of this mix (except on the rephlex comp.)
which came out in 1993.

i know kool kat released an e.p. with three mixes of 'don't lead me', i
don't have it at hand, but i'm nearly certain that the west side mix isn't
one of them.

i've a few sealed copies of the original. i open one every now and then to
smell the air of chicago in 1987.
james

 From: Erik Jälevik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:33 -
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: (313) Future Sound compilation on Rephlex
 
 I've got a CD compilation called The Best of Future Sound Records which came
 out on Rephlex in 94 on which the tracklisting seems to be wrong. There are
 9 tracks on the disc but only 8 are listed on the cover. Track 4 is a really
 nice old-school Detroit type track and I'm trying to find out what it really
 is. The cover says Terry Baldwin Delta House but that's clearly wrong as
 that's the track after. Anyone have this who knows?
 
 Thanks.
 
 



RE: (313) Future Sound compilation on Rephlex

2002-12-17 Thread Wibo Lammerts
I have a copy that I want to part with. Hit me back privately.

W

-Original Message-
From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 18 december 2002 11:50
To: Erik Jälevik; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Future Sound compilation on Rephlex


that'll be the west side remix of the classic 'don't lead me' by house
master baldwin and paris grey. this mix isn't on the original 1987 release
and i've never come across a copy of this mix (except on the rephlex comp.)
which came out in 1993.

i know kool kat released an e.p. with three mixes of 'don't lead me', i
don't have it at hand, but i'm nearly certain that the west side mix isn't
one of them.

i've a few sealed copies of the original. i open one every now and then to
smell the air of chicago in 1987.
james

 From: Erik Jälevik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:33 -
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: (313) Future Sound compilation on Rephlex
 
 I've got a CD compilation called The Best of Future Sound Records which
came
 out on Rephlex in 94 on which the tracklisting seems to be wrong. There
are
 9 tracks on the disc but only 8 are listed on the cover. Track 4 is a
really
 nice old-school Detroit type track and I'm trying to find out what it
really
 is. The cover says Terry Baldwin Delta House but that's clearly wrong as
 that's the track after. Anyone have this who knows?
 
 Thanks.
 
 


(313) Humanoid - Rephlex

2002-12-17 Thread Jason Donnelly

Bent Crayon, coming soon section:

HUMANOID: Sessions 84-88 CD (REPHLEX). Brian Dougans is most famous as 
half of the duo Future Sound Of London, but early recognition came for him 
with the European and UK hit single 'Stakker Humanoid', under the name 
Humanoid in 1988.

15.99/2XLP $TBA



Re: (313) Humanoid - Rephlex

2002-12-17 Thread Tristan Watkins
- Original Message -
From: Jason Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: (313) Humanoid - Rephlex


 Bent Crayon, coming soon section:

 HUMANOID: Sessions 84-88 CD (REPHLEX). Brian Dougans is most famous as
 half of the duo Future Sound Of London, but early recognition came for him
 with the European and UK hit single 'Stakker Humanoid', under the name
 Humanoid in 1988.
 15.99/2XLP $TBA

I just stumbled onto this review of it on the Overload site last night:
http://www.overloadmedia.co.uk/reviews/reviews.php?new_reviews=true

2002-12-11 - Single STAKKER 'Eurotechno' (Rephlex)
Most people will recognise Stakker and immediately think of Humanoid and the
alltime classic Stakker Humanoid. Well, Stakker is pioneering video artist
Mark McLean who originally teamed up with Brian Dougans (Humanoid and half
of FSOL) on this work that originally soundtracked an early foray into the
art of visual stimulation. Rephlex have painstakingly tracked down the
original video and remastered this lost treasure for a new generation to
enjoy. For the record this is original acid rave UK style, a listen to this
shows you what the likes of Kosmik Kommando and Squarepusher were brought up
on. There is an art to getting funk out of a small silver box and a lot of
today's artists could learn from this. It reminds me of a time of innocence
and enthusiasm and a feeling that electronic music could go anywhere. For
all the acid teds and heds out there, and for anyone who loved the original
Stakker Humanoid this is a document of those fresh and exciting times.  MH

Tristan
=
Text/Mixes: http://phonopsia.tripod.com
Music: http://www.mp313.com
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

New Mix in mp3, 'Live in Iowa City' available for
a short time from http://phonopsia.isoprax.com




(313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread sean deason
it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing album on K7. I
dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but praise for them for
the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch of new Swayzak
records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally hear what all of
the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records on, and track
after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not trying to put
them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi production thing down
perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll just have to wait
this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions everywhere these
days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just sorta feels like
kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without the grit and
angst punk rock is just satire.

sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason




Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
Sean, i reccommend Snowboarding in Argentina lp on Pagan and  most def. the
Shape Memory Effect ep on Force Inc.
There is also Himawari but i havent heard it so im not gonna say much about
it. ;-)

I think those are the release that are often reffered to when praising
Swayzak.

nice one,
fab.


- Original Message -
From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]; techno
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: (313) swayzak


 it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
 yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing album on K7. I
 dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but praise for them
for
 the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch of new
Swayzak
 records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally hear what all
of
 the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records on, and track
 after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not trying to
put
 them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi production thing down
 perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll just have to
wait
 this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions everywhere these
 days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just sorta feels
like
 kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without the grit and
 angst punk rock is just satire.

 sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason





Re: (313) MOS - Aminpeck

2002-12-17 Thread marsel


track is unreleased
and no other plans yet

At 14-12-2002 -0500 13:04, you wrote:

downloaded this from the MOS website. Does anyone know if it was released
on 12 and on what label?
cheers
pc





Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Mislav Bobic
similar thing happened to me ordering no.1 clubtune in laurent garners
playlist' (me believing
in french dj whom I kinda respect): northern light - my pain - lasergun.
hopefully managed to cancel my order after hearing few seconds of RA
soundbytes on the net.

lived in the 80's (being pretty young) and believe better stick to the
originals ...

listen-to-your-ears-mislav-or-have-a-trustee-somewhere ...


- Original Message -
From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]; techno
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:15
Subject: (313) swayzak


 it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
 yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing album on K7. I
 dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but praise for them
for
 the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch of new
Swayzak
 records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally hear what all
of
 the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records on, and track
 after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not trying to
put
 them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi production thing down
 perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll just have to
wait
 this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions everywhere these
 days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just sorta feels
like
 kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without the grit and
 angst punk rock is just satire.

 sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason






(313) One last mixer question

2002-12-17 Thread Brendan Nelson
As tempted as I was by the PCV-275, its lack of an adjustable crossfader
curve put me off in the end. In my quest to find something that can
support the more hip-hop inspired mixing style of booty with my typical
techno/house mixing activities, however, I came across this, the Stanton
SMX-501:

http://www.stantonmagnetics.com/alpha44/mixers_smx-501.asp

It seems to have pretty much every feature you'd want from a battle
mixer, but at the same time has things like effects sends which would
allow me to get all self-indulgent while making four-hour mix sessions
comprised solely of two copies of C4 blended into one another.

So this simple question is for the pessimists, nay-sayers and
half-emptiers of the list: why should I *not* buy this mixer? Answers
are probably best supplied off-list, though, for fear of re-starting a
four-day off-topic thread... :)

Brendan


(313) song ID

2002-12-17 Thread seth redmond
Got a song request for you'se. about 38 mins, carl craig @ panacea on 
paxahau.


http://www.paxahau.com/sounds/2001/adecember/12-31-01_carlcraig_1_panacea.ram

nice one

-s

_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail




Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Michael Lees
I've been a big swayzak fan since the release of Snowboarding in 98. It 
doesn't happen often but when I heard that record I felt that I'd found 
my ideal sound (at the time).


Himawari I also love, they started the vocals on this but IMO it worked 
well. The first track 'Illegal' features Benjamin Zephaniah and it works 
well. The third track, 'State of Grace' sounds more like the dirty 
dancing stuff. There are aspects of the first album though, Leisure 
Centre and Betek are great tracks.


When I bought dirty dancing I wasn't impressed, the only track I like is 
 'ping pong'. The good things you've been hearing about swayzak are 
justified, but the things you've been hearing don't apply to the last 
album. Some of the 12s they've released also stand out as some of their 
best work, 020100 is a great track, a couple of the Theorem 
collaborations are good too.


Cheers

--Mike


Fabrizio Nahum wrote:

Sean, i reccommend Snowboarding in Argentina lp on Pagan and  most def. the
Shape Memory Effect ep on Force Inc.
There is also Himawari but i havent heard it so im not gonna say much about
it. ;-)

I think those are the release that are often reffered to when praising
Swayzak.

nice one,
fab.


- Original Message -
From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]; techno
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: (313) swayzak




it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing album on K7. I
dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but praise for them


for


the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch of new


Swayzak


records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally hear what all


of


the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records on, and track
after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not trying to


put


them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi production thing down
perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll just have to


wait


this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions everywhere these
days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just sorta feels


like


kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without the grit and
angst punk rock is just satire.

sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason







--
Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~mhl/



Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Michael Lees

Oh almost forgot,

you can hear my take on swayzak stuff,

http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/%7Emhl/eletero-qualitas.mp3

;) plug while I get the chance.

Michael Lees wrote:
I've been a big swayzak fan since the release of Snowboarding in 98. It 
doesn't happen often but when I heard that record I felt that I'd found 
my ideal sound (at the time).


Himawari I also love, they started the vocals on this but IMO it worked 
well. The first track 'Illegal' features Benjamin Zephaniah and it works 
well. The third track, 'State of Grace' sounds more like the dirty 
dancing stuff. There are aspects of the first album though, Leisure 
Centre and Betek are great tracks.


When I bought dirty dancing I wasn't impressed, the only track I like is 
 'ping pong'. The good things you've been hearing about swayzak are 
justified, but the things you've been hearing don't apply to the last 
album. Some of the 12s they've released also stand out as some of their 
best work, 020100 is a great track, a couple of the Theorem 
collaborations are good too.


Cheers

--Mike


Fabrizio Nahum wrote:

Sean, i reccommend Snowboarding in Argentina lp on Pagan and  most 
def. the

Shape Memory Effect ep on Force Inc.
There is also Himawari but i havent heard it so im not gonna say much 
about

it. ;-)

I think those are the release that are often reffered to when praising
Swayzak.

nice one,
fab.


- Original Message -
From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]; techno
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: (313) swayzak




it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing album on 
K7. I

dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but praise for them



for


the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch of new



Swayzak


records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally hear what all



of

the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records on, and 
track

after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not trying to



put

them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi production thing 
down

perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll just have to



wait


this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions everywhere these
days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just sorta feels



like

kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without the grit 
and

angst punk rock is just satire.

sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason









--
Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~mhl/



Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
 a couple of the Theorem
 collaborations are good too.

Yeah i forgot!!! probably my fave material besides snowboarding...
serious crossover appeal for both the deep-tech headz and the minimal fiends
out there

ciao
fab.



- Original Message -
From: Michael Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fabrizio Nahum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: (313) swayzak


 I've been a big swayzak fan since the release of Snowboarding in 98. It
 doesn't happen often but when I heard that record I felt that I'd found
 my ideal sound (at the time).

 Himawari I also love, they started the vocals on this but IMO it worked
 well. The first track 'Illegal' features Benjamin Zephaniah and it works
 well. The third track, 'State of Grace' sounds more like the dirty
 dancing stuff. There are aspects of the first album though, Leisure
 Centre and Betek are great tracks.

 When I bought dirty dancing I wasn't impressed, the only track I like is
   'ping pong'. The good things you've been hearing about swayzak are
 justified, but the things you've been hearing don't apply to the last
 album. Some of the 12s they've released also stand out as some of their
 best work, 020100 is a great track, a couple of the Theorem
 collaborations are good too.

 Cheers

 --Mike


 Fabrizio Nahum wrote:
  Sean, i reccommend Snowboarding in Argentina lp on Pagan and  most def.
the
  Shape Memory Effect ep on Force Inc.
  There is also Himawari but i havent heard it so im not gonna say much
about
  it. ;-)
 
  I think those are the release that are often reffered to when praising
  Swayzak.
 
  nice one,
  fab.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: sean deason [EMAIL PROTECTED]; techno
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
  Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:15 PM
  Subject: (313) swayzak
 
 
 
 it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
 yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing album on K7.
I
 dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but praise for them
 
  for
 
 the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch of new
 
  Swayzak
 
 records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally hear what all
 
  of
 
 the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records on, and
track
 after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not trying to
 
  put
 
 them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi production thing
down
 perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll just have to
 
  wait
 
 this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions everywhere these
 days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just sorta feels
 
  like
 
 kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without the grit
and
 angst punk rock is just satire.
 
 sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason
 
 
 
 

 --
 Mike

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~mhl/




Re: (313) One last mixer question

2002-12-17 Thread plaztikjezuz
I really like stanton mixers. I have bought two this year one for me and a 
friend, both the SK-2F.

I find there design to easy to use, with med. size knobs, nice smooth faders, 
and a very clean sound. I also like the way the EQ cuts and how powerful it is; 
I used a numark before.

I recomend this mixer to everyone who is looking for a two channel scratch 
style, so I don't see why the three channel version would differ.

also there price is unbeatable; I picked one up off of ebay for $150 +s/h

scotto
lansing, mi.

 As tempted as I was by the PCV-275, its lack of an adjustable crossfader
 curve put me off in the end. In my quest to find something that can
 support the more hip-hop inspired mixing style of booty with my typical
 techno/house mixing activities, however, I came across this, the Stanton
 SMX-501:
 
 http://www.stantonmagnetics.com/alpha44/mixers_smx-501.asp
 
 It seems to have pretty much every feature you'd want from a battle
 mixer, but at the same time has things like effects sends which would
 allow me to get all self-indulgent while making four-hour mix sessions
 comprised solely of two copies of C4 blended into one another.
 
 So this simple question is for the pessimists, nay-sayers and
 half-emptiers of the list: why should I *not* buy this mixer? Answers
 are probably best supplied off-list, though, for fear of re-starting a
 four-day off-topic thread... :)
 
 Brendan


RE: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Stang Anya
Dirty Dancing is definitely missable.
I remember liking Himawari a lot when it came out (2000?) but
haven't listened to it in ages so possibly not as outstanding
as I thought at the time? Having said that my taste has changed
(expanded in a positive way I like to think ; ) quite a bit since
then so that's perhaps why. The Swayzak vs. Theorem tunes
are _really_ good though.

 I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions 
 everywhere these
 days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just 
 sorta feels like
 kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without 
 the grit and
 angst punk rock is just satire.

Well, I grew up in the 70's, and tbh a lot of the stuff that was
punk rock didn't really ring that true back then either.
But - it was something different, and in this respect your
comment is spot-on. Thanks!

Anya

Nina Hagen rocks!

 -Original Message-
 From: sean deason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:15 PM
 To: sean deason; techno; 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: (313) swayzak
 
 
 it seems many of you were confused by my Swayzak Electroclash remark
 yesterday. I was refferring to the Swayzak Dirty Dancing 
 album on K7. I
 dont know much about Swayzak, but I'd heard nothing but 
 praise for them for
 the longest time. Imagine my excitement when one day a bunch 
 of new Swayzak
 records showed up in my mailbox. I couldnt wait to finally 
 hear what all of
 the hoopla was about regarding these guys. I put the records 
 on, and track
 after track, nothing but Joy Division sounding stuff. I'm not 
 trying to put
 them down or anything, they do have the 80's low-fi 
 production thing down
 perfectly, but it's not really my cup of tea. I think I'll 
 just have to wait
 this trend out too. I see a lot of Punk Rock fashions 
 everywhere these
 days and, like electroclash, it rings very hollow, it just 
 sorta feels like
 kids playing dressup. What they dont realize is that without 
 the grit and
 angst punk rock is just satire.
 
 sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason


Re: (313) 808 State

2002-12-17 Thread marsel


better late then never
but i can agree on this one.

the period with just before ninety and ex:el was the best. wasn't that fond 
of solaris (or what was the album after ex:el called?) with ninety and 
ex:el they got more  more their own typical sound, with olympic and lift 
etc. don't know even how to call it - but ninety in it's original form (not 
the tommy boy us version) is the best for me.. indeed with magical dream, 
donkey doctor, cobra bora and more - only eight/nine tracks - i mean, it 
really was an album


i've been even to a concert, they did back then, in nighttown rotterdam
at the same time, the shamen had their own sound system and did a tour as 
well, synergy or some like that?


i got that video they did, called optical
good to say mc tunes doing he dance chill moves
:)

at that time ztt should be doing a project by may, saunderson and atkins as 
well - intellex or some?


At 13-12-2002 -0600 06:03, you wrote:

you gotta be kidding me, their best stuff (in my opinion) was after he left
Pacific State, Cobra Bora, album 90, album Ex:Cel, ect..

on 12/13/02 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 PREAnything they did when Gerald was a member is worth picking up as
 well as
 ALL Geralds early stuff.  They weren't that good after he left imo...



.. . :: http://nomorewords.net 





Re: (313) 808 State

2002-12-17 Thread Dan Sicko


On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 10:01  AM, marsel wrote:



better late then never


I meant to chime in on this too -- Don Solaris is my favorite, in all 
its overly-romantic, uber-produced glory. I think it holds together as 
an album better than any of the others, and has some of the best vocal 
performances (Louise Rhodes, James Dean Bradfield) to boot.




RE: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Samu Eilola


don´t care if dirty dancing LP is fashionable or not.
there´s only one track that doestn´t do it for me.
buffalo seven with vocals from kotai is one of the best tracks on 2002
on my list 

but gotta admit i liked shape memory effect ep even more :)



RE: (313) nyc nye

2002-12-17 Thread Grammenos, Peter

Here's a good nye party, it won't cost you $200, and it
will go until at least 2pm the next day ;)

Magda/Dinky/Plexus/Troy/Ambassador

http://www.olex.org/NYE/02.html

-Pete



-Original Message-
From: MadR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) nyc nye



--- Rob Theakston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi Doris.
 
 There's this thing that you might want to check out
 NYE in NYC that's WAY better than Oakey (unless
 it's Human League Oakey, and that would acceptable.
 I think).
 
 They have this giant party where everyone gathers in
 Times Square. Heck even Dick Clark shows up every
 year! Anyways, they do this thing where they drop
 the ball on NYC, ushering in the new year with alot
 of people and confetti and MTV has bad musical
 guests. You might want to check that out. Last I
 heard it's free of cost, and it's free of Oakey.
 
 - The Theakston

well you get Tiesto instead 
haha !!!

mad'r

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


Re: (313) 808 State

2002-12-17 Thread alex . bond
Memo from Alex Bond of PricewaterhouseCoopers

 Start of message text 

Marsel;
at that time ztt should be doing a project by may, saunderson and atkins
as
well - intellex or some?

Ok, anyone want to tell me more? I know of a pop-ish project by Derrick and
Juan that never got released (mind you, it doesn't sound that pop, maybe
thats why it never came out). The same thing?

- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
give your consent to such monitoring.
_
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.



Re: (313) 808 State

2002-12-17 Thread marsel


i guess it's the same

i should have to check my techno magazine archive
there was an article about it in a dutch magazine
:)

At 17-12-2002 + 15:19, you wrote:

Marsel;
at that time ztt should be doing a project by may, saunderson and atkins
as
well - intellex or some?

Ok, anyone want to tell me more? I know of a pop-ish project by Derrick and
Juan that never got released (mind you, it doesn't sound that pop, maybe
thats why it never came out). The same thing?



.. . :: http://nomorewords.net 





Re: (313) 808 State

2002-12-17 Thread Dan Sicko
It was supposed to be Derrick, Kevin and Juan, but I would assume that 
Inner City pulled Kevin's

attention away.

I didn't think it ever got to the point where any material was produced?

Would have been interesting to see Detroit techno packaged as a group 
through the ZTT filter ...


-d

On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 10:21  AM, marsel wrote:



i guess it's the same

i should have to check my techno magazine archive
there was an article about it in a dutch magazine
:)

At 17-12-2002 + 15:19, you wrote:

Marsel;
at that time ztt should be doing a project by may, saunderson and 
atkins

as
well - intellex or some?

Ok, anyone want to tell me more? I know of a pop-ish project by 
Derrick and
Juan that never got released (mind you, it doesn't sound that pop, 
maybe

thats why it never came out). The same thing?



.. . :: http://nomorewords.net






RE: (313) 808 State

2002-12-17 Thread Brendan Nelson
I'd also heard that it was going to be produced by Trevor Horn, who had
had some strange ideas about a black-futurist-hetero Pet Shop Boys... as
interesting an idea as it sounds, I can imagine that not doing it was
the right thing to do...

| -Original Message-
| From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 17 December 2002 15:35
| To: marsel
| Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
| Subject: Re: (313) 808 State
| 
| 
| It was supposed to be Derrick, Kevin and Juan, but I would 
| assume that 
| Inner City pulled Kevin's
| attention away.
| 
| I didn't think it ever got to the point where any material 
| was produced?
| 
| Would have been interesting to see Detroit techno packaged as 
| a group 
| through the ZTT filter ...
| 
| -d
| 
| On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 10:21  AM, marsel wrote:
| 
| 
|  i guess it's the same
| 
|  i should have to check my techno magazine archive
|  there was an article about it in a dutch magazine
|  :)
| 
|  At 17-12-2002 + 15:19, you wrote:
|  Marsel;
|  at that time ztt should be doing a project by may, saunderson and 
|  atkins
|  as
|  well - intellex or some?
| 
|  Ok, anyone want to tell me more? I know of a pop-ish project by 
|  Derrick and
|  Juan that never got released (mind you, it doesn't sound that pop, 
|  maybe
|  thats why it never came out). The same thing?
| 
| 
|  .. . :: http://nomorewords.net
| 
| 
| 
| 


Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Tristan Watkins
He also did the Groovetechnology v1.3 mix for Groovetech, which has a nice
tracklist - haven't heard the mix though.

Tristan
=
Text/Mixes: http://phonopsia.tripod.com
Music: http://www.mp313.com
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

New Mix in mp3, 'Live in Iowa City' available for
a short time from http://phonopsia.isoprax.com




Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Anya Stang
That mix is in fact a real nice ride, as nice as
the track selection suggests.
http://www.k7.com/data.pl?release=K7122CD
http://www.k7.com/audio/audio.cgi?DE-G93-02-90023.rm
And it's they not he, James Taylor  David Brown.

Gz, I gotta stop reading this list so much...
Where's my anorak?

Anya : )

 From: Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue 17/Dec/2002 16:17 GMT
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Re: (313) swayzak
 
 He also did the Groovetechnology v1.3 mix for Groovetech, which has a nice
 tracklist - haven't heard the mix though.

___
Freeserve AnyTime, only £13.99 per month with one month's FREE trial!
For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on 0800 
970 8890




(313) How to kill electroclash (was: swayzak)

2002-12-17 Thread marc christensen
Instead of accepting the term electroclash (which has obviously 
allowed this thing to go on way longer than the music's 15-minutes of 
fame one-note humor deserves) why don't we steal a term from 
architecture and call it Electro Revival in the breathiest 
upper-class british accent we can muster.  sort of like a house -- 
you know, it's a tudor Reh-VI-val, dee-ah.(Remember, a tudor 
revival bears about as much similarity to tudor architecture as 
electroclash bears to the 80's as many of us lived it...)


I think the term Revival might be extra fun too, for Detroiters -- 
if intoned with a fake British accent, it might have the amusing 
effect of reminding folks of the dreadfully affected pseudo-british 
accents some locals took on during the early-to-mid 80's


yeesh.  two weeks of that kind of treatment, and electroclash will be 
gone.  RIP.


-m.



At 7:15 AM -0500 12/17/02, sean deason wrote:

sean lived the 80's, no need to recreate them deason




(313) thomas fehlman contacts.(OT)

2002-12-17 Thread moog
hi all any chance any of u have it?
y.



Re: (313) ableton live 2 beta 2 out (public)

2002-12-17 Thread Kookie
Man that was a pain in the ass to install.
- Original Message -
From: ::) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:42 PM
Subject: (313) ableton live 2 beta 2 out (public)


 http://www.ableton.com/beta/download.php


 Please send all bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not use any
 other email address, the forum or other means of contact to report a bug.

 -Joe


 
 jinjin_a_gogo: i wonder what he's listening to in those bigazz headphones
 while's he's spinning this shxt for us







Re: (313) swayzak

2002-12-17 Thread Fred Heutte
I really liked Bueno/Fukumachi, the first Swayzak release (1997).
And they've put out quite a variety since then, many of which
are at least pretty good.  When they came to town here in Portland
about a year ago, they played a great live set and I had a long
talk with them afterwards (which also involved visiting my office
and admiring my record collection, which always goes a long way
with me :)

I haven't heard the current stuff but it wouldn't surprise me if
they picked up the Joy Divisionish sound for the moment -- 
David Brown is from Scotland so I presume the Mancunian influence
is pretty strong.

But what really drives these guys is dub -- I know they were big
fans of Adrian Sherwood and the On-U Sound fraternity, which has
also been a key influence for me (the on-u mailing list, which
I still am on, was the first one I ever subcribed to on the Net,
back in 1989).

So I would recommend (to Sean and anyone else) to check out
their other stuff as well.  

fred