date:20031024

RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - You guys rock

2003-10-24 Thread Tony Murray

 It is really cool.

Todd, this may be a sign that you need to get out more :-)

-- Original Message --
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:54:47 -0400

Sure,

Small, medium or Large.

Also BTW.  Go on over to Aelita's website and click around.  They have a
promo to get a t-shirt that says Master of My Active Directory.  It is
really cool.  My whole team got them today.

Todd Myrick

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - You guys rock

So, you are saying he gets a Puck?
  Original Message 
 Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - You guys rock
 From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, October 23, 2003 11:07 am
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Check is in the mail Yusuf.  :P

 Thanks for the kind words, I appreciate it.  Especially being compared 
 to Joe, Rick, Robbie and Gil.

 Todd Myrick
 -Original Message-
 From: Mayet, Yusuf Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:12 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - You guys rock

 I agree Al that the contributions from the likes of Joe, Rick, 
 Robbie,Todd, Gil .and and (that's the rest of the folks I haven't 
 mentioned) have all
 been well appreciated.

 And over these past years you guys have been my inspiration and thus 
 wanting to excel myself all of the time

 Presently I am at the age of 24 with only a handful of years of 
 experience and I have learnt so much and so much more to learn from 
 all of you.

 With me being located at the edge of Africa I am hoping at one time I 
 would have the opportunity to rub shoulders with you guys sometime or 
 the other.

 Thanks again guys

 yusuf 
 __
 __
 __
 For information about the Standard Bank group visit our web site
 www.standardbank.co.za http://www.standardbank.co.za 

 __

 Disclaimer and confidentiality note
 Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official
 business of Standard Bank Group Limited  is proprietary to the group. 
 It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. 
 Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and
 opinions
 are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of the
 group. 
 The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient.
 Please
 notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and
 do
 not read, 
 disclose or use the content in any way.
 Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication
 has
 been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
 interference.

 ___
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role holding DC's

2003-10-24 Thread John Reijnders

Hm ... That could have been one of the ideas behind this feature.
However, it seems to be a rather nasty feature, especially in AD environment
that contain firewalls that separate the schema master from Exchange boxes.
(I know, I know ... Firewalls WITHIN a AD environment?). There is a KB
article on this issue (280178). Reading this article I get the feeling that
every Exchange installation tries to UPDATE the schema (that's an
interesting way of verifying the schema, isn't it?). I would prefer a
Exchange installation to check the schema on a random DC. I think that the
failure of an Exchange installation is one of your last worries when you're
running an environment in which DCs do not replicate for weeks ;-) ... 

I know Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem. But I'm not aware of
the current status and plans on fixing this issue (for example by making it
customizable whether or not you want this check to happen on the Schema
Master). Anybody ... Anybody at all?

John

-Original Message-
From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: vrijdag 24 oktober 2003 9:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FSMO role holding DC's

Just a thought John.  Could the restriction be in place to avoid problems in
cases where the E2K installation is made on a DC that has not yet received
the replication changes arising from a schema update?  For example, if a DC
in a remote site has had replication problems and has not received updates
for a week or so.

Tony
-- Original Message --
From: John Reijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:13:00 +0200

As an addition to the previous mails I would like to point out a particular
issue with the schema master. The installation of an Exchange 2000 server
explicitely needs to contact the DC holding the schema master. The reason
for this contact is to check whether or not the schema is updated with the
Exchange extensions.

I consider this to be a bug because every single DC in the forests holds the
Schema partition and should therefor be able to verify whether or not the
Schema has been updated. This wasn't solved a couple of months ago. Mayby MS
will solve it in a next Service Pack of Exchange, but untill then ... Make
sure that every Exchange box can contact the Schema Master!

Cheers!
John Reijnders

-Original Message-
From: Abbiss, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 20 oktober 2003 11:58
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] FSMO role holding DC's

I have nudged this issue in an earlier post but would like to ask again for
confirmation from the collective genius contained in this list.

Do all DC's in a domain HAVE to have a direct connection to the FSMO role
holding machines or is there a way of proxying these roles ?

What are some of the likely major implications of maintaining a DC without
access to FSMO role holders ? The DC in question is replicating with other
DC's, so has all objects but just doenst have any connection to the FSMO
role holders.

Any thoughts ? 

Many thanks
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers

2003-10-24 Thread Oliver Marshall

Just to let you know the Sourceforge site for the Windows Server
Documentation Project has been approved. Mail me off list and I will set
everyone up on it.

Look forward to hearing from ya :) 

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall 
Sent: 23 October 2003 09:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers

Almost an identical situation here. I would also like to know that, as I
am the only one of me here, I could have some documentation that would
help contractors get up to speed on the network. Some day I want a
holiday, with my mobile phone, or my net connection, and then we need to
get a contractor, and the firm CERTAINLY wont pay for him to start a few
weeks before I leave to get up to speed!!!

I have registered the Windows Server Documentation Project with
Sourceforge, and I will hear if they will set it up in the next few
days.

If those of you are interested want to mail me (each other) off list,
then perhaps we will be able to see what happens (???)

Look forward to hearing from you.

Olly 

-Original Message-
From: Creamer, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2003 17:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers

I have multiple goals for my server docs, although DR is definitely the
most important to me.

The more servers we get, the more I need a way to quickly tell how much
disk, how much RAM, what patch levels, what apps are running, IIS or
not, what services running under what credentials, blah blah blah

Is others have said, there are many ways to get at the information, but
it would be nice to kick off a script and have it return what I want
whenever. 

Management seems to think having a binder with server documentation in
it as each new box gets built is sufficient. I contend it changes too
often and would like something more dynamic. Maybe a scheduled polling
event that writes to a database would be best. I've already started,
thanks to Robbie's cookbook and Matthew Lavy's WMI Scripting, and would
be happy to participate in a more global project...

mc

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

[ActiveDir] Sort a Query with more 10000

2003-10-24 Thread Raul Martínez









Hi

 I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory and I have a OU with
10 objects, and I have a query with ASP. The
problem is that when I like to present the query descending by fechaUpload
(for example), Active doesn't order it.

The code is the following one:
 
oCommand.properties(size limit)=100
oCommand.properties(sort on)= fechaUpload

LDAPQuery=LDAP://10.100.111.28/OU=documentos,DC=aspdocxier,DC=i2000,DC=es
oCommand.CommandText=select familia, categoria, subcategoria,
fechaupload,
numVersiondoc, pathFTP from ' LDAPQuery ' where
objectClass='doc' and
familia='scanx' 

Thanks.

Raul.

[ActiveDir] Active Directory Cookbook

2003-10-24 Thread Lou Vega




Received my very own copy of Mr. Robbie Allen's 
"Tuna" book last night from Amazon.com - in the first night's reading the book 
is already proving it's worth as I see how to do certain things much simpler 
than I had done them before (with regards to the VBScripts included), as well as 
learn new things I didn't realize could be done (in both AD2K and AD2K3). The 
book will be very handy as I continue to stand up my development Windows 2003 
domain.

To anyone else on this list who hasn't gotten it 
yet...it's a worthwhile addition to your Active Directory library.

To Robbie (and all the others who assisted him!) - 
thanks for a great resource!

r/
Lou

Re: [ActiveDir] Sort a Query with more 10000

2003-10-24 Thread Tony Murray


Raul

Is the leading space character in  fechaUpload you have below also in your actual 
code?  This might explain it.

oCommand.properties(sort on)= fechaUpload

Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Raul Martínez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:21:46 +0200

Hi

I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory and I have a OU with 10
objects, and I have a query with ASP. The
problem is that when I like to present the query descending by fechaUpload
(for example), Active doesn't order it.

The code is the following one:

oCommand.properties(size limit)=100
oCommand.properties(sort on)= fechaUpload

LDAPQuery=
ldap://10.100.111.28/OU=documentos,DC=aspdocxier,DC=i2000,DC=es
LDAP://10.100.111.28/OU=documentos,DC=aspdocxier,DC=i2000,DC=es;
oCommand.CommandText=select familia, categoria, subcategoria, fechaupload,
numVersiondoc, pathFTP from ' LDAPQuery ' where objectClass='doc' and
familia='scanx' 

Thanks.

Raul.



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

[ActiveDir] W2K DC's to W2K3

2003-10-24 Thread Simpsen, Paul A. (HSC)

After upgrading our DCs to 2003 (actually rebuilds) everything
is running smoothly EXCEPT for win95. (Possibly 98 also) I know that they are
no longer supported, and havent been for some time, but we are a
University. We do have a deadline of Jan 1 that all 9x machines be gone. But
until then we have to deal with their problems, saying they are no longer
supported just doesnt cut it. The problem I am dealing with first showed
up through Ghost boot disks using DOS getting access denied errors. We have
given the campus a work around for this but in further testing it seems that
from a 95 client (98 NT4 havent been tested yet) you cannot do a
net view to the 2003 DCs but can to our 2 remaining 2000 DCs in a
remote site. Does 2003 handle NET API commands differently? After
extensive research we have only found and tried a few things, one being
enabling anonymous LDAP access (straight from TUNA Cookbook) good book by the
way. And also enabled the security setting of Network access: Let Everyone permissions apply to anonymous users.

It appears that neither change has helped,
any ideas would be appreciated.

Paul Simpsen

Windows ServerAdministrator

Enterprise Systems, IT

University of Oklahoma HSC

405.271.2262 ext 50230

Fax: 405.271.2181

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail
communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination,
distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please destroy all copies of this
communication and any attachments.

57 matches

Mail list logo