[sc-issues] [Issue 49828] Unable to import text file s into Calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49828 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 11 20:28:45 + 2010 --- SPAM. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 53596] The number of the text and the number of the number can't conversion to each other
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 10 17:50:20 + 2010 --- SPAM. Please remove and do not call the above link. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 19880] Upgrading a network instal l needs to be easier
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=19880 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 08:37:42 + 2010 --- The above attachment is SPAM. Do NOT call the link! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 68854] Create or madify of db tab les in oracle jdbc db not possible
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68854 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:38:36 + 2010 --- The above attachement is SPAM. Do NOT open. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[installation-issues] [Issue 10031] trying to run program prod uces disc activity but no program
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10031 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:43:41 + 2010 --- Thei attachement is SPAM. Do NOT call. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 10301] TextFieldMaster.User enhan cement for storing variables (xml)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10301 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:44:12 + 2010 --- This attachement is SPAM. Do NOT call. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 10309] Printing with images fails to Postscript printer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10309 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:45:02 + 2010 --- The above attachement is SPAM. Do NOT open page. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 10418] Compilation error on gipar ser
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10418 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:45:29 + 2010 --- The above attachement is SPAM. Do NOT open page. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 10427] Database program?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10427 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:45:59 + 2010 --- The above attachement is SPAM. Do NOT open page. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 10557] After inserting EPS graphi cs file, document cannot be printed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10557 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:47:56 + 2010 --- The above attachement is SPAM. Do NOT open page. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 10868] Outlining Feature
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10868 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 18:54:52 + 2010 --- The above attachement is SPAM. Do NOT open page. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |er,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_|er,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_ |,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler,no|,kohei,kpalagin,matthiasba |rbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,paga|sler,mwexler,norbert2,nsaa |lmes' |,okapi1253,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105217] Long outstanding, importa nt Writer issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105217 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 17:03:28 + 2009 --- I posted a rather long mail as a starting point for discussion on us...@qa.openoffice.org but there's nobody listening. This mailing list is currently idle. I'll leave it at that. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105217] Long outstanding, importa nt Writer issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105217 Issue #|105217 Summary|Long outstanding, important Writer issues Component|Word processor Version|current Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|TASK Priority|P3 Subcomponent|programming Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|matthiasbasler --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 09:49:00 + 2009 --- I have long wondered how to point the OOo developers to the fact that while more and more new features are added to OOo (like Base and new proposed UIs), there are a LOT of P3 issues with much interest which have not been solved (or even looked at) for years! This is why I intend to collect such issues in this meta-issue and reference them from here. People can add further issues they come across if are are 2 years old, important (in their opinion) but not solved yet. As a hint: An issue can be considered important if - there is no easy workaround - it blocks the adaptation of OOo for you or in your organization - it has more than 20 votes or 10 CC readers. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 45775] Allow to inherit formula c olour (color) from paragraph text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45775 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|Automatic colour (color) c|Allow to inherit formula c |hanging |olour (color) from paragra | |ph text --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 10:30:02 + 2009 --- Made summary more precise. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105217] Long outstanding, importa nt Writer issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105217 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn| |972,4260,5156,9370,13009,2 | |2753,26446,28574,41502,420 | |19,44189,45499,45501,45511 | |,45775,73465 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 10:40:19 + 2009 --- Here is what I have found so far, grouped by topic: Year Issue Description 2002 Issue 9370 Off-margin page background 2005 Issue 42019 Gradient and Hatching for Page Background 2003 Issue 22753 Image Cropping with jpeg preview ok but on the page wrong (which turned out to be a cropping problem with linked images) Here some issues of mine, confirmed by OOo member(s): 2005 Issue 45499 Applying frame style to image ignores image aspect ratio 2005 Issue 45501 Inconsistent behaviour applying frame style to an image Some from bibliographic project: Year Issue Description 2002 Issue 4260 Proposals for Bibliographic facility enhancements. 2005 Issue 44189 Bibliography entry in document is not reflecting updated values in Bibliography database 2007 Issue 73465 Enhancement of the insert bibliography entry dialog 2003 Issue 13009 Option to set sorting of bibliographic entries and Issue 28574 Sorting bibliography entries were closed as duplicate, but (a) are not yet solved and (b) got lost in the huge meta-issue they are now included. Given that for an code insider it is TRIVIAL to sort the entries in the list and make the dropdown larger, it is poor that this hasn't been solved yet. Some from formula editor (One was reported 8 years ago!!!) 2001 Issue 972 Alignment of baselines of formula and text in writer 2004 Issue 26446 inherit font size of formulas from paragraph 2002 Issue 5156 colors in formulas and Issue 45775 Allow to inherit formula colour (color) from paragraph text (... a similar topic) 2005 Issue 41502 need scalable slash 2005 Issue 45511 Integral sign too small and not scalable I am confident that when these issues are resolved, then OOo will have much more acceptance, f.e. in scientific and legal fields and in companies which are strict about corporate identity. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 5156] colors in formulas
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5156 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 22753] Image Cropping with jpeg p review ok but on the page wrong
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22753 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 45501] Inconsistent behaviour app lying frame style to an image
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45501 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 972] Alignment of baselines of fo rmula and text in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[www-issues] [Issue 972] Alignment of baselines of fo rmula and text in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 45499] Applying frame style to im age ignores image aspect ratio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45499 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 28574] Sorting bibliography entri es
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=28574 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 4260] Proposals for Bibliographic facility enhancements.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4260 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 26446] inherit font size of formu las from paragraph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 9370] Off-margin page background
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9370 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 45775] Allow to inherit formula c olour (color) from paragraph text
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45775 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 42019] Gradient and Hatching for Page Background
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42019 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|15522 |15522,105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 41502] need scalable slash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41502 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 45511] Integral sign too small an d not scalable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45511 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105217 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105217] Long outstanding, importa nt Writer issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105217 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 14:58:39 + 2009 --- Sub-component programming means Macros, Basic, API and so on in OOo. Not to-dos for the programmers I see. Could you please update the subcomponent description accordingly? Currently it is too general: Use this component if the feature/enhancement is mainly related to programming tasks. But it remains that you address the *wrong* problem here. I understand. Several people (according to their comments) have been under the impression that issues were indeed forgotten. Good to hear this is not the case. Maybe the problem is that, apart from a OOo Later target there is no indication that issues have been or will be re-evaluated according to the criteria in the well-known why_all_issues_are_equal document you mention. P.S. I tried to increase objectivity by creating a query for the given criteria, but failed: The query would run forever and time out as the criteria became more complex (e.g. using regex for the number of CC listeners). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105217] Long outstanding, importa nt Writer issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105217 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 17:34:04 + 2009 --- @discoleo Please ... stay polite. These guys work hard, I am sure. I also know that OOo has too few developers (or too few funding, as you prefer) to get all the issues solved in a timely manner. Its the same with almost every software company. (Unfortunately I am a Java programmer and already involved in another project; and I cannot fix every software myself.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 104840] Unreliable pagination (te xt or image location wrong) and strange undo b ehaviour
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104840 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 17 16:48:16 + 2009 --- Closing as WONTFIX. In the picture properties, click he option Follow text flow. IMHO it is unintuitive that this is not the default behaviour. But at least it works now. For the second case, please give a sample document. I wish I knew which document it was... I'm closing the issue for now until I encounter the problem again to give you a sample. OK? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 104840] Unreliable pagination (te xt or image location wrong) and strange undo b ehaviour
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104840 Issue #|104840 Summary|Unreliable pagination (text or image location wrong) a |nd strange undo behaviour Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.1.1 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|All Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|matthiasbasler --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 6 15:30:48 + 2009 --- Following issue has occurred several times already, even with OOo2.x, in a manner that is hard to predict. Here are two scenarios, which likely have a similar cause: 1. I had a text containing (linked) images inserted relative to the paragraph, in this case spreading across the whole page. Later I added text at the page containing the image near the bottom. As the text became longer the lowest paragraphs and the image were supposed to move to the next page. The text did, but the image moved out over the page's text area until the very bottom of the page. Some line of text even moved behind the image!!! (Invisible in my screenshot, for obvious reasons.) Only when the whole paragraph that originally was above the image, moved even further down, suddenly the image was moved to the next page. And what is most interesting: It stayed there when I did undo. I was, however, able to reproduce this problem by deleting and re-inserting text on the previous page again. 2. Similar case, but with test this time: Sometimes I noticed that a document of mine would show a lot of emtpy space at the bottom of the page, when opened. The paragraph from the next page could easily fit there or at least start there (even taking orphans and widows into account). When I delete the paragraph break between this and the previous paragraph and re-insert the break then the second paragraph indeed gets correctly located on the first page. Again, undo will keep the correct behaviour and not revert to the wrong one seen before. Although I haven't tried to reproduce this at will, I have the feeling that in such cases it can happen that after saving the document, closing OOo and reloading the document the just corrected pagination error will appear again. Issue found on a WinXP SP 3 PC. If you need further information, let me know. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 104840] Unreliable pagination (te xt or image location wrong) and strange undo b ehaviour
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104840 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 6 15:32:37 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64573) Error described in case 1. Note that one line of text is hidden behind the top of the image. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 22753] Image Cropping with jpeg p review ok but on the page wrong
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22753 --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 21 21:09:24 + 2008 --- I ran into this issue today with OOo3.0 m9 (!) on WinXP SP2. How can it be that an image cropping bug hasn't been fixed for years? Do you need more reproducable examples? What I found today were two (possibly related) effects: - Cropping an image on the left side would show a correct preview, but on the page the image would be stretched to the left into the (correctly calculated) space. Of course the image aspect ratio was NOT supposed to change. - After I set an image to Original size it would ignore any cropping applied, even if deleted and reinserted. Sorry to say this, but the crop function seems so buggy to me it is almost unusable for an everyday user. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 97466] AutoSize (Automatic image size) doesn't work for frame templates
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 Issue #|97466 Summary|AutoSize (Automatic image size) doesn't work for frame | templates Component|Word processor Version|OOO300m9 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|All Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|matthiasbasler --- Additional comments from matthiasbas...@openoffice.org Sun Dec 21 21:34:48 + 2008 --- But encountered on WinXP SP3, German language. The option is called Autom. Größe there. To reproduce - create a new empty document - create a frame template where you set a width of, lets say, 4.0 cm. - Check on AutoSize in the hight section. Leave the minimum height to 0.04 cm. - Insert an image into the the document and apply the frame template. Result: The image will get EXACTLY the entered height (0.04 cm) instead of calculating its height from the image ratio, as is suggested by the tooltips by the AutoSize option. Unchecking AutoSize gives the same result, suggesting that the option is simply ignored by the application. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 61089] Make index page number cli ckable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61089 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'rainerbielefeld' |'matthiasbasler,rainerbiel | |efeld' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 22 22:03:12 + 2008 --- I strongly support this. Nowadays most users will expect this to simply work - by default. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 4756] Expand shortcut possibiliti es (Use of Alt key is not offered)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4756 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 13:10:43 + 2008 --- Being the original reporter I feel like I should respond to the recent comments as well: 1. Please read my first comment. The Alt key combinations were just one out of three examples, so please don't reduce the issue to just the Alt+... part. 2. tommy27 wrote people who do not need Alt+soemthing hotkey could easily leave those unassigned. Exactly. Nobody would be hurt. I might add that probably most users only work with OOo under one OS only and therefore wouldn't even notice that the shortcut possibilities might be different on different OS. 3. The discussion whether OOo is a M$ Office clone or not seems totally irrelevant to me. Given that most OOo users are Windows users, offering a Windows-only solution would still make sense imho. Even offering features only available on Mac OS and/or Linux can make sense. There is imho no problem with OS specific features in OOo as long as they are documented for the user. Besides a lot of features in OOo are used only by a minority of people, and compared to them the features suggested in this issue have (quite obviously) a LOT of potential users. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54213] Offer to change references to changing names
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 18 08:10:27 + 2008 --- See above. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 35114] Autosaving should be suppr essed if doc is being saved/was saved
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35114 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 18 19:34:38 + 2008 --- Retested with OOo2.4.0 - AutoSave dialog doesn't exist any more, so it cannot show up wronly. - Saving seems not to happen if document was already saved. At a first glance this was all I asked for - FIXED - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 35114] Autosaving should be suppr essed if doc is being saved/was saved
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35114 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 18 19:35:53 + 2008 --- Closed since fixed in (or before) 2.4.0. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 55182] Missing visual cue (crawli ng ants) for active selection
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55182 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 18 19:43:54 + 2008 --- Retested with OOo2.4.0 on WinXP SP2. There is still no indicator of which cells have been copied into the clipboard. So the feature wish is still valid. I'd ask the developers to either (a) reject the wish (b) implement it or (c) set a schedule for when it will be done/decided on (BTW. Same goes for other bugs/requirements that havn't seen an update for years.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 41502] need scalable slash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41502 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 16:00:38 + 2008 --- Retested with OOo2.4.0 on WinXP SP2. Issue remains unchanged. Sad issues like this aren't addressed within three years. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 45499] Applying frame style to im age ignores image aspect ratio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45499 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 16:07:47 + 2008 --- Retested with OOo2.4.0 Issue remains unchanged, as I would expect. Image ratio is still ignored. IMHO this should be rated BUG, not ENHANCEMENT, since the user is lured into believing that the image ratio would be respected when applying thr frame style by the AutoSize checkbox. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54213] Offer to change references to changing names
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 16:18:26 + 2008 --- Retested with OOo2.4.0 on WinXP SP2 I coun't reproduce the issue any more, so I believe it has been fixed. Setting it to FIXED. Feel free to reopen if you think otherwise. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 48130] OOo seems to hang on savin g, useless progress bar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 15 17:39:35 + 2008 --- Retested with OOO2.4.0 (German). The issue remains unchanged, both for saving to ODT and the old SXW. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 45511] Integral sign too small an d not scalable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 10 17:24:08 + 2007 --- @tl As you correctly note, the sign is appropriate (or maybe just slightly too large) for an integral with a one line formula behind. My point however was, that I want the symbol to automatically scale according to the size of the formula behind. If it is a fraction or anything spanning two or more lines, it should be larger. This is not so much a font problem imho. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 972] Alignment of baselines of fo rmula and text in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 25 19:27:09 + 2007 --- I agree that cdeval's solution is relatively easy to implement, but I don't understand one thing: If the information that a formula is baseline aligned with the surrounding text is not stored in the file, how is the OOo Math module supposed to know after reloading such a document that the user wanted the formula to be aligned in such way? OOo would never know THAT it has to check and (if necessary) recalculate the vertical alignment, as far as I understand this approach. cdeval also wrote: 2) Currently, I you change text attribute (font, size, color, ...) of a paragraph which includes a formula, this one doesn't change because these parameters are independant of text. So, you get a difference between text and formula. I think it wouldn't be a defect if alignement wouldn't change. A double click on formula to open math module will recalculate the right position. And if there is too much formulae to recalculate position one by one, add-on such as dmaths or CmathOOo will do the job This sounds like a bad hack to me. In every software professional for professional use (and I assume OOo is such software), the user must be able to RELY on the software to follow a decision the user has once done. If the user tells OOo that a certain formula must be aligned correctly with the text, then the user will simply expect OOo to maintain this state, no matter if the document is closed/reopened, text size is changed, the formula is changed or whatever! Any solution that requires the user to remember to update the formula or all formulae explicitly should only be short term solution. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 972] Alignment of baselines of fo rmula and text in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 25 19:27:09 + 2007 --- I agree that cdeval's solution is relatively easy to implement, but I don't understand one thing: If the information that a formula is baseline aligned with the surrounding text is not stored in the file, how is the OOo Math module supposed to know after reloading such a document that the user wanted the formula to be aligned in such way? OOo would never know THAT it has to check and (if necessary) recalculate the vertical alignment, as far as I understand this approach. cdeval also wrote: 2) Currently, I you change text attribute (font, size, color, ...) of a paragraph which includes a formula, this one doesn't change because these parameters are independant of text. So, you get a difference between text and formula. I think it wouldn't be a defect if alignement wouldn't change. A double click on formula to open math module will recalculate the right position. And if there is too much formulae to recalculate position one by one, add-on such as dmaths or CmathOOo will do the job This sounds like a bad hack to me. In every software professional for professional use (and I assume OOo is such software), the user must be able to RELY on the software to follow a decision the user has once done. If the user tells OOo that a certain formula must be aligned correctly with the text, then the user will simply expect OOo to maintain this state, no matter if the document is closed/reopened, text size is changed, the formula is changed or whatever! Any solution that requires the user to remember to update the formula or all formulae explicitly should only be short term solution. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www-issues] [Issue 972] Alignment of baselines of fo rmula and text in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 23 22:55:54 + 2007 --- Hi mba, I think there is (at least) one good solution: OTOH if we made it a real option for positioning as also requested in comments in this issue we had to calculate the position of the formula each time when we load the document. Not if you store the information twice in the file format: - Store the information that the formula is baseline aligned - Store the current value where it was last positioned. The latter will allow quick positioning when the document is loaded, the former will contain the rule for recalculation whenever recalculation becomes necessary. We also face contradiction in the OASIS TC as this positioning will force any ODF readers to reimplement the baseline calculation by themselves. Not a good argument imho. Any word processor displaying wanting to display documents has already to do quite a lot of calculations in oder to correctly display a document's layout. I cannot believe adding baseline recalculation makes that much of a difference then. Maybe this issue can be relaxed if the ODF specification contained a proposed calculation algorithm in programming language independent form. Converting this into C, Java, whatever should then not be a big problem. Maybe someone could even write a small utility program that could be used from different software. (Just thinking loud.) ... Or am I misunderstanding the concerns here? My opinion is that any solution, whatever it may be, must always store the information that the formula was aligned by the basemap IN THE DOCUMENT. Quick hacks, e.g. trying to infer this information from, lets say, any static position of the formula as suggested above will only cause us grief later - and they are unreliable. I'd rather have document format change in order to get a CLEAN solution than a quick hack that works in 90% of all cases only (any maybe in OOo, but not KOffice or something like that) It would be bad for its reputation if only a few months after its birth we changed it incompatibly. We are not talking about few months after its birth any more now. Of course, the number of incompatible file format updates must be kept to a minimum, but how else will there be significant progress in OpenDocument if not by extending the standard. Not that this would not impact backward compatibility, so old documents would not become invalid. ... And you can expect people to update their software from time to time, especially if it is Open Source software like OOo or KOffice. I'm even afraid that old OOo versions will report an error on loading documents with a new value for vertical-pos (though I'm not sure). This would be even worse compared to MS Office problems of the past. If so this would be bad indeed, but it would show a general problem that must be solved both in the ODF specification and the software: Any specification compliant software should be required to accept (or ignore) formerly unknown elements in the file format without throwing exceptions!!! It must have a fallback solution in case it doesn't know the value for a known attribute. Just my 2 cents. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 972] Alignment of baselines of fo rmula and text in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 23 22:55:54 + 2007 --- Hi mba, I think there is (at least) one good solution: OTOH if we made it a real option for positioning as also requested in comments in this issue we had to calculate the position of the formula each time when we load the document. Not if you store the information twice in the file format: - Store the information that the formula is baseline aligned - Store the current value where it was last positioned. The latter will allow quick positioning when the document is loaded, the former will contain the rule for recalculation whenever recalculation becomes necessary. We also face contradiction in the OASIS TC as this positioning will force any ODF readers to reimplement the baseline calculation by themselves. Not a good argument imho. Any word processor displaying wanting to display documents has already to do quite a lot of calculations in oder to correctly display a document's layout. I cannot believe adding baseline recalculation makes that much of a difference then. Maybe this issue can be relaxed if the ODF specification contained a proposed calculation algorithm in programming language independent form. Converting this into C, Java, whatever should then not be a big problem. Maybe someone could even write a small utility program that could be used from different software. (Just thinking loud.) ... Or am I misunderstanding the concerns here? My opinion is that any solution, whatever it may be, must always store the information that the formula was aligned by the basemap IN THE DOCUMENT. Quick hacks, e.g. trying to infer this information from, lets say, any static position of the formula as suggested above will only cause us grief later - and they are unreliable. I'd rather have document format change in order to get a CLEAN solution than a quick hack that works in 90% of all cases only (any maybe in OOo, but not KOffice or something like that) It would be bad for its reputation if only a few months after its birth we changed it incompatibly. We are not talking about few months after its birth any more now. Of course, the number of incompatible file format updates must be kept to a minimum, but how else will there be significant progress in OpenDocument if not by extending the standard. Not that this would not impact backward compatibility, so old documents would not become invalid. ... And you can expect people to update their software from time to time, especially if it is Open Source software like OOo or KOffice. I'm even afraid that old OOo versions will report an error on loading documents with a new value for vertical-pos (though I'm not sure). This would be even worse compared to MS Office problems of the past. If so this would be bad indeed, but it would show a general problem that must be solved both in the ODF specification and the software: Any specification compliant software should be required to accept (or ignore) formerly unknown elements in the file format without throwing exceptions!!! It must have a fallback solution in case it doesn't know the value for a known attribute. Just my 2 cents. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 34093] Force linear regression cu rve to go through zero point (origin)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=34093 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 16 14:28:26 -0700 2006 --- @oooer: You see this from a strict scientifically point of view when you say bend the truth. I may point out that Office suites are used (and are to be used) by all sorts of people, some of which might not even care about scientific statistics, just want a nice fitting for visualization. Take f.e. a businessman that wants to visualize the mean growth of their company's profits and which knows that it had 0 profits in, lets say, 2000, because it the company was just founded this year. He/she wants a diagram with a line going through the (2000, 0) point simply for the look of it. Also sometimes constraints such as fixed points simply exist. Sometimes it is better for a computer model to prefer a slightly wrong relationship formula over the correct regression, simply to avoid computation side effects and artefacts, or to simplify calculation. You'd maybe call this unscientifically, but such tradeoffs are imho justified in science - as long as they are documented. (I won't go deeper in this - this mailing list is the wrong place for such debates.) Specifically to your comments: - Having warning dialogs if the user does something unscienfically would be very appropriate in a scientific software like an actual statistics program. For a general office suite I find this out of scope. Imho OOo cannot (and should not even try) to find out when, lets say, diagramm types are inappropriate, diagram colors are hard to tell apart, formulae are nonsense or anything of this sort. - The human brain is much better at seeing the best fit than an incorrectly applied bit of maths. You seem to have a much better brain for this, since with my brain I would not dare to fit a line manually, except for a rough sketch. ;-) But seriously, people don't use OOo's diagram features to paint. And I don't like this penalty approach: If you are not doing strict statistics, use OOo Draw and paint your line by hand. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[graphics-issues] [Issue 34093] Force linear regression cu rve to go through zero point (origin)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=34093 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 12 10:01:53 -0700 2006 --- Thanks for your thoughtful comment, oooer. May I suggest following compromise: There SHOULD be a feature to have a graph going through the point of origin, but it should NOT be termed linear regression, since it is none, as you pointed out. Maybe it could be termed Best linear fit though point of origin or anything similar that makes a quick point without being confused with linear regression or other inappropriate statistical terms. (Suggestions welcome.) Adding a line by hand is not a solution at all, since the whole idea of the feature is, that the slope is calculated from the data. When drawing the line by hand one would have to calculate the line's angle manually beforehand. Beside that, drawing on diagrams is imho never a good idea, since the diagram may change in size and content, so the drawn line wouldn't fit any more after any change. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 48130] OOo seems to hang on savin g, useless progress bar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW OS/Version|Windows XP|All Version|680m95|OOo 2.0.2 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 2 06:25:44 -0700 2006 --- Yes, with OOo2.0.2 on WinXP SP2 the behaviour is still exactly as desribed. I'll update the issue's version to reflect this. Also I'll set this confirmed and OS:All, since kb could obviously reproduce it under linux. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 45511] Integral sign too small a nd not scalable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 13:49:38 -0800 2005 --- Thanks for pointing to this duplicate, 30790. Obvioulsly I am not the only one having problems with the small integral signs. I just want to express explicitely that I acknowledge the objection raised in issue 26048, which is that integral signs should not scale automatically by contents since this could produce many different integral signs on one line of formulae - which doesn't look nice. However I believe that the suggestion I made - having two (max. three) explicite integral sign sizes - does circumvent this problem and is also easy to use. In general I consider it important that the user has control over the size (as all comments so far agree). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 44668] Formulas font looks worse in OOo 2.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44668 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 10:42:49 -0800 2005 --- Following note should be made here (It drove me nearly crazy today until I found the solution.): The formula rendering quality is NOT ONLY dependent on OpenOffice. Under windows it is also much dependent on the anti-aliasing selected in Windows directly. 1. Under Linux: Anti-aliasing is turned on and off using the option OpenOffice.org - View - Screen font antialiasing (German: OpenOffice.org - Ansicht - Bildschirmschriften glätten 2. Under windows such option doesn't exist. It exists in the Control Panel. Open View options in the Control Panel, select tab Display - Effects. In the dialog there are options to select no anti-aliasing, Normal or ClearType anti-aliasing. What is selected, heavily determines how the formulae look in OOo. Moreover ClearType can be configured (google to find out how to do this), which will result in different looks again. ... I wonder how to check quality of formula rendering under these circumstances - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 54182] Poor equation sign render ing quality of symbol fonts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54182 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 10:52:18 -0800 2005 --- I wrote: I find that in 2.0RC1 anti-aliasing is turned off. The result is that the equation sign is no longer 'blurred', ... Please see my latest comment in issue 44668. Anti-aliasing was disabled in Windows. (I didn't know there was such setting. Now I know.) This explains why I found anti-aliasing for the formulae to be off. So ignore my latest comment in this issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 9370] Off-margin page background
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9370 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 09:39:02 -0800 2005 --- I believe I found another near-workaround, but it would work after a very minor change to the code (I believe so, I don't know!): Add a header or footer to the page (or the page template). Insert the image into the header or the footer. Edit the image properties. Now you can adjust the alignment to be, f.e. left and top relative to the full page. What's left to do is to set the image size. For the width this will usually work fine, you just have to set the image width to the ration of (page width/text are width), maybe 130% or so. The problem is the height. Headers or footers are usually 1-2 cm height, so one would need to scale the image size to maybe 1500% (of the header height). This is currently not supported since the variable used to store the image size in percent is only a byte variable (i.e. it can be max. 254%). If this could be changed to be ushort data type (0-65536) or something like this, one could scale the image to fill the whole page. Shouldn't be that big a problem, should it? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 9370] Off-margin page background
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9370 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 10:02:24 -0800 2005 --- Update: Above solution really works, of one uses absolute measures (i.e. 21cmx29.7 cm), not relative measures (120%x1500%). I'll attach a sample document. Note1: With the image in the background it is hard to edit the text. The cursor will always highlight the image instead of the foreground text. So better add the image at the end of the editing process. Note2: This seems to work only with OOo2.0, in OOo1.1.5 it seems not to be possibe to have images larger than the header/footer height in the header resp. footer. (As expected exporting the backgound image to .sxw from OOo2.0 doesn't work either.) Note3: I don't think this workaround obsoletes a real solution of the issue, where the document stays easily editable even with the image in the background. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 9370] Off-margin page background
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9370 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment | |(id=31382) Workaround for | |full-page background image | |with floating text --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 10:04:41 -0800 2005 --- Created an attachment (id=31382) Workaround for full-page background image with floating text - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 55181] Missing capability to cut /copy/paste entire rows/columns
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55181 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 02:28:44 -0700 2005 --- Makes sense. Confirmed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 55182] Missing visual cue (crawl ing ants) for active selection
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55182 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 02:35:28 -0700 2005 --- The way Excel handles this is indeed not a good archetype. I always found it confusing. Your suggestion on this sounds sensible. (Until the user edits any cell, or starts a new selection.) That said, I don't know how easy or hard it will be to implement this. But I will pass it to the developers. Thanks for the suggestion. Confirmed. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 54182] Poor equation sign render ing quality of symbol fonts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54182 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 07:24:20 -0700 2005 --- Update: Since I (and others) first reported this issue there has obviously been a major change in formula rendering: I find that in 2.0RC1 anti-aliasing is turned off. The result is that the equation sign is no longer blurred, but now it happens often at the standard settings (100% and 12pt TimesNewRoman), that one of the two equation sign bars is not visible at all. So the = looks like a minus. (This effect is only seen when formula editing is finished, not while the formula is in editing mode. P.S. Tested in Writer, not Math.) I wouldn't call this an improvement... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 55182] Missing visual cue (crawl ing ants) for active selection
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55182 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Issue type|DEFECT|FEATURE Keywords| |oooqa Summary|Missing visual cue|Missing visual cue |(crawling ants) for active|(crawling ants) for active |selection |selection --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 11:58:35 -0700 2005 --- Hi eyalzvi, how exactly should this work. I mean, active selection and clipboard content are two different things. 1. The active selection is already marked by inverting the colors. If you mark some (usually white) cells, they become black until you click somewhere else. So I guess that's not what you mean. 2. When you copy their contents to clipboard, there's indeed no frame. Yes, I know programs that use crawling ants for this. The point is: If you continue your work, should this marker disappear? How long should it stay? Until the clipboard contents changes? Wouldn't it be annoying to have this crawling ant frame (or something similar) aroung while doing other work? Please share your thoughts on this with us. (P.S. This is not a bug, but a wish for a new feature. Corrected.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54819] Horizontal scrollbar stop s paging across when cell is more than twice p aging width
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54819 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Summary|Horizontal scrollbar stops|Horizontal scrollbar stops |paging across when cell is|paging across when cell is |morethan twice paging |more than twice paging |width |width --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 12:09:14 -0700 2005 --- I don't find this problem with OOo2.0RC1 on WinXP SP2. However I find that the scrollbar slider changes it's size. (Is this a bug or intended?) It is small if column 1 or 2 (the big one) are the leftmost ones and much larger when I scroll further to the right. My interpretation is that this behaviour might be dependent on the window manager (or OS in this case). So someone with Linux should check this there. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54795] visual artifacts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |oooqa OS/Version|Linux |All --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 12:17:49 -0700 2005 --- Completely confirmed with OOo2.0RC1 on WinXP SP2. (- OS=all) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 55181] Missing capability to cut /copy/paste entire rows/columns
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55181 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Issue type|DEFECT|FEATURE Keywords| |oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 12:33:02 -0700 2005 --- Your solution would require that the PC knows whether you want to - paste the column's content over the content in this column OR - insert the column before the selected column But I have an alternative suggestion, at least for moving columns/lines: Many table implementations today allow table column reordering, i.e. you just drag a column header and drop it between two other columns (often with a small arrow indicating between which two columns it would be placed). The only difference would be that in OOo this would not just visually reorder the columns, but actually move the contents of affected cells internally. For lines this could work in the same way. (Just as a suggestion.) (P.S. This is not a bug, but a feature wish. Corrected.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 9370] Off-margin page background
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9370 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 13:29:20 -0700 2005 --- Hi grsingleton Nice idea, but this is just a workaround for a one or two page document. Using a text frame for the continuous text is not a good idea. Just try following two things with your document to see the problem: - Fill the inner text frame until the page is full. Add more text. You frame does expand. But the user expects is, that (as usual) a new page starts. - Try to insert a manual page break. Guess you cannot - it's disabled. So, for continuous text over multiple pages you solution doesn't work. Sorry. Maybe you find a better one... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54211] MASSIVE DEFECT: Do NOT d estroy data when references vanish
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords| |oooqa Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 04:21:29 -0700 2005 --- I can confirm that this works in OOo1.9.125 German (but in WinXP SP2). So I'll close this issue. P.S. Please do not make such a fuss like MASSIVE DEFECT and P1. There were/are a lot of issus in OOo of this importance, they all got checked, not just the ones crying Me first!. ;-) So should you encounter this again, please open a new issue - with P3 (max. P2!), I should think. Thanks anyway. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54210] MASSIVE DEFECT: Calc des torys data connected to names when inserting c ells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54210 This issue depends on issue 54211, which changed state: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54212] Move names associated wit h moving cells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54212 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnThis|54210 | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Priority|P2|P3 Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 04:25:03 -0700 2005 --- I can confirm this works OK in OOo1.9.125. (German, on WinXP SP2) Should you find this problem again, please reopen the issue. Thanks for reporting. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54210] MASSIVE DEFECT: Calc des torys data connected to names when inserting c ells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54210 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn|54211,54212,54213 |54211,54213 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54210] MASSIVE DEFECT: Calc des torys data connected to names when inserting c ells
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54210 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn|54211,54213 | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords| |oooqa Priority|P1|P2 Resolution| |INVALID --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 04:34:52 -0700 2005 --- I will close this issue for following reasons: - Multiple issues in one issue, especially with different priorities - there are/were separate issues for them created - two of them are obviously fixed. So, since only one issue remains this collection issue becomes unnecessary. Issue 54213 (= sub issue 3) remains open. P.S. Please try to avoid things like MASSIVE DEFECT: and please check the priotity levels next time: Even data loss is only P2. (P1 would be if OOo formatted your harddisk or so, I guess. ;-) ) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54211] MASSIVE DEFECT: Do NOT d estroy data when references vanish
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54211 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnThis|54210 | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54213] Offer to change reference s to changing names
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnThis|54210 | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54213] Offer to change reference s to changing names
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Issue type|DEFECT|ENHANCEMENT Keywords| |oooqa OS/Version|Linux |All Priority|P2|P3 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 04:44:05 -0700 2005 --- Indeed. Confirmed with OOo1.9.125 German on WinXP SP2. In my optinion 1.) there should be the possibility to edit an existing name. This should automatically update all references. (Or can someone imagine a case where you would want to edit an existing cell name and NOT update references?) 2.) if the user deleted the existing name a popup dialog should ask whether to update references to point to the normal cell location (e.g. A5) instead, so references stay intact even without the name. 3.) if the current name is dropped and an new one is added OOO should detect that and ask if the references should get updated to the new one. But: What if the user added more than one new name? Select one? P.S. This is not a bug (things work as designed by the developers), but rather a good idea for improvements. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 54010] Auto outline removing oth er outlines
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54010 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'nagashree' |'matthiasbasler,nagashree' Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords| |oooqa Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 05:08:33 -0700 2005 --- Hi abdul I don't see a big problem and I definitely don't see a P2 issue! Some comments: - Just adding some data and expecting OOo to find some suitable outlines doesn't work. AutoOutline checks formulae, such as sums. Please have a look at the OOo help (search for AutoOutline there). They have an example that shows what AutoOutline is good for. This explains why AutoOutline just removes the outlines in your case. Important: You don't need to mark cells. AutoOutline works on the whole sheet! - It would be quite problematic for the function to create outlines automatically if the existing ones are not deleted before. (This would maybe result in overlapping outlines. I'm not sure this is supported.) - If you don't like what AutoOutline did you can just undo it. (Undo works!) So all in all AutoOutline works as expected - I cannot see a bug. I guess you just had wrong expectations on how it works. There is certainly room for improvements though: Maybe AutoOutline could only work within a selected range of cells and let the outlines outside this selected area untouched, as you expected. You could open a new issue if you like this idea (P4 and enhancement please). But I will have to close this issue for now since the described effect is not a bug but intended under the given circumstances. You can still comment on this issue, even if it's closed - just in case you still have questions. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53355] Spreadsheet opening very slow
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53355 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'kohei' |'kohei,matthiasbasler' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |oooqa Priority|P3|P4 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 05:19:30 -0700 2005 --- Confirmed with OOo1.9.125 on WinXP SP2. Takes about the same time for me. The strange thing is that I cannot see anything special. It's just a not too large number of simple sheets. Did you apply any special formatting or do you have any other idea why exactly this document is so hard to load? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53679] text in cells is screwed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53679 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Keywords| |needmoreinfo, oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 8 05:25:59 -0700 2005 --- Hi pol6. No, this doesn't look very good. Can you please create a small sample document (.csv) and a step by step guide on how to reproduce the problem. This would help a lot. You can attach the document the same way as you attached the images. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53347] Crash when looking at Aut oCorrect in calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53347 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|needmoreinfo, oooqa |oooqa OS/Version|Linux |All --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 5 02:06:08 -0700 2005 --- Thanks for your intense testing work. Now I can confirm the crash. The interesting thing is that the way OOo Calc is opened is crucial for me: a) When I directly open Calc from the start menu and do the next steps as described I get the crash. b) If however I open Writer, from there open a new spreadsheet document, then close writer (so only Calc stays open) and then follow the steps there is NO crash for me. (Note: I don't have the quickstarter running.) Anyway: The crash was there on my German OOo1.9.125 on WinXP SP2, so this issue is confirmed. Also I will set the OS flag accordingly. Thanks for all your detective work. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53925] Invisible Character
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53925 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 11:32:18 -0700 2005 --- Hi Joe I will close this issue for now, since if the problem is not reproducable, it is almost impossible to find the source of it. Should you come across the problem again or find out more (maybe after plaing with xNumbers again) you can simply reopen the issue. (I admit that I don't know what xNumbers actually is/are. Could it be related to this issue?) Thanks anyway for trying to help. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53522] File stays locked after c losing Calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53522 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 11:35:35 -0700 2005 --- Good if it is obviously solved. You might reopen the issue if it occurs again. Thanks for reporting. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 54182] New - Poor equation sign r endering quality
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54182 Issue #:|54182 Summary:|Poor equation sign rendering quality Component:|Formula editor Version:|OOO 2.0 Beta2 Platform:|All URL:| OS/Version:|Windows, all Status:|NEW Status whiteboard:| Keywords:| Resolution:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P5 Subcomponent:|ui Assigned to:|mru Reported by:|matthiasbasler --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 03:06:24 -0700 2005 --- Many user's have alread reported this (including me in issue 44668 and Colin in issue 53688, both of which are closed): At normal zoom (100%) and font size (12pt) the equation sign looks blurred and the two bars are not of equal size (One is two pixels big and grey, the other one 1 pixel and dark grey). Sometimes it's the other way round. Is it possible to fix this? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 53688] Math symbols poorly rende red
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
User matthiasbasler changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
CC|''|'matthiasbasler'
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords| |oooqa
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 03:12:58 -0700
2005 ---
Hi Colin,
To respond to your comments (tested with OOo1.9.m125 aka beta2 on WinXP SP2,
100% zoom level):
(1) the horizontal bars of [ and ] are too thick.
Cannot confirm this. But note that sometimes one and the same formula is
rendered slightly different. Maybe this explains things.
(2) the two bars of = are not of equal thickness.
Yes, this is true. However there was already an issue dealing with the worse
rendering quality compared with OOo1.1.x: issue 44668.
It's closed in the meantime but the equation sign problem you describe is not
fixed. We should open a new issue spoecific to this?
The bar over the A is not bold.
It is, at least for me with Zoom=100%
The bar over the first a does not cover the complete bracketed expression.
Bar is not the correct thing here. bar{} is supposed to work for one
character only. What you are probably looking for is overline{}, to be found
in the lower left corner of the same symbol dialog. I admit this is a bit
confusing.
The bar over the second a seems more ober the i subscript than the a
Maybe left [ {bar a} rsub {i j} right ] is what you are looking for in the
second case. Here the bar is over the a only, due to the brackets.
Fazit:
- I'ts a bit unlucky you put problems with so different solutions into this
one issue. I close this one as invalid and opened another one (issue 54182)
specifically for the equation sign issue.
- Please recheck with OOo1.9.m125. Should you still find some other rendering
problems, please create specific issues for each of them and include the zoom
level at which you find the rendering problems (At levels other than 100%
formulae tend to look more ugly). Thanks.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 53687] Create table fails
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53687 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 03:30:26 -0700 2005 --- Hi Colin, Funny, how did you get THIS toolbar? Since I don't find an Insert table button either in my UI I wonder how your's got there. It should be clear to all of us that inserting tables in formulae is (at least as far as I know) not supported and such button does not belong there. I could imagine that you maybe imported settings from an older OOo installation. Is this the case? If so, please remove the OOo2.0 installation, reinstall it and do NOT import the old OOo1.1.x settings. After that, do you still see this button? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 53687] Create table fails
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53687 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment | |(id=29291) How the formula | |toolbar is supposed to | |look (German version) --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 03:31:24 -0700 2005 --- Created an attachment (id=29291) How the formula toolbar is supposed to look (German version) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53347] Crash when looking at Aut oCorrect in calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53347 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Keywords| |needmoreinfo, oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 03:40:29 -0700 2005 --- Hi naten, can you find a way to definitely and repeatedly cause this crash. It is almost impossible to fix bugs that occur just one time or just for one person. (Maybe it would also help to get more information about your environment: what Linux + window manager etc.) How did you close the dialog? OK, Cancel or with the X button? Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53522] File stays locked after c losing Calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53522 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Priority|P3|P4 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 04:17:08 -0700 2005 --- Hi vchoi I cannot reproduce this. If I create and save a simple Calc file with OOo1.9.125 and close calc I can move the file or remove the USB stick, even if the quickstarter is running. - Does this error occur for you with 1.9.125 too? - Are there any specific steps that you do in order to run into the problem? What I did was: Open file on USB stick by double-clicking, doing trivial changes, saving and closing Calc. Removing USB stick with the WinXP task bar button. No problem. Can someone else please check this too? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53522] File stays locked after c losing Calc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53522 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Keywords| |oooqa - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53925] Invisible Character
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53925 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Keywords| |needmoreinfo, oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 04:24:56 -0700 2005 --- I cannot reproduce this either. OOo1.9.125 (German) on WinXP SP2. @joeconner: Did you try a fresh install? Is there anything specific on your PC, any exotic theming or so. Is this reproducible after a reboot? Does this just occur on 1.9.125 or did you observe it with older versions already? This is very strange. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 53596] The number of the text an d the number of the number can't conversion to each other
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Keywords| |needmoreinfo, oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 04:41:54 -0700 2005 --- Hi redoffice, I'm sorry but I don't understand your problem. I had a look at the cell formatting dialog in my German version of OOo1.9.125 on WinXP SP2 and it looks OK, including the different locale settings. Maybe it would help if you attached a screenshot that shows the problem and/or describe one specific example of what's wrong. Also, what locale (what language version) are you working with? What do you mean with The number of the text and the number of the number can't conversion to each other? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 54184] Square bracket poorly ren dered in matrices
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3|P4 Target milestone|--- |not determined --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 08:14:47 -0700 2005 --- Confirmed on WinXP with OOo1.9.125. Well spotted!!! This is a font scaling problem: The effect occurs stronger the larger the font size is. Try with size 60 and it becomes very prominent and really ugly. This is only a cosmetical bug, but really nasty, so P4 should be appropriate? I've not checked yet how a printout would look, btw. (Maybe someone should do a throughout check for such issues that aries with large font sizes?) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 54184] Square bracket poorly ren dered in matrices
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment | |(id=29299) Matrix problem | |as seen with font size 60 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 08:18:00 -0700 2005 --- Created an attachment (id=29299) Matrix problem as seen with font size 60 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 54184] Square bracket poorly ren dered in matrices
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 3 08:33:40 -0700
2005 ---
Hi rainer,
From your screenshot I can see that the matrix there was approx. 12 pt with
600%
zoom level because a 20 pt matix with 600% wouldn't fit on a usualy XGA screen.
But around 12 pt the brackets are indeed OK.
Please check once again with exactly below formula, inserted in Writer using
Insert-formula:
size 60 {bold A = left[alignr matrix{5#6#5##6#7#1##5#1#-1}right]}
(P.S.: cjwhrw forgot the closing }.)
If you still don't see the problem, don't worry. Others will. ;-)
Thanks.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 43620] Too few space for German text in installation wizard
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43620 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|matthiasbasler|is --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 05:20:04 -0700 2005 --- Hi is, sorry to reassign this back to you: I'm just a QA volunteer with no experience in OOo coding. So I can't change anything (e.g. insert scrollbars). I can just check how it looks after some developers have done the code changes and there is a public milestone available. (Or is this change already done in m122?) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 51103] Conditional formatting no t working properly wuen duplicating a sheet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|REOPENED Keywords|oooqa |needhelp, oooqa Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 09:16:14 -0700 2005 --- Hi fst. You wrote: as all other Spreadsheets I know set conditions for Conditional Formattings as absolute reference ... I am sorry but I have to point out that I just checked with Excel 2000 and Excel 2003, and BOTH use RELATIVE references, that is, there is no reference to the sheet if the reference points to the same sheet (e.g. =$B$2). Please check that yourself. ... we are in line with the others. If other programs do mistakes or have a bad handling I don't think I would like to be in line with them. It was the goal of OOo to be better than other office suites, not to just mimic their behaviour. Besides that we are obviously NOT in line with Excel, as pointed out above. It's up to the designer of the *sheet* not the Spreadsheet program to set the correct addressing In principle yes, but the user really must have the possibility to decide. There are currently no option buttons absolute and relative to choose from, nor is there any obvious other hint how to decide between absolute and relative sheet addressing. To make it very clear: I do not believe the current situation is intuitive! I reopen this issue for the last time now and I would like to hear the opinion of other developers and users before it gets closed again. Thanks. Matthias - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[framework-issues] [Issue 48130] OOo seems to hang on savi ng, useless progress bar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 13:11:20 -0700 2005 --- matthiasbasler-TM: Can I send you the document personally? I don't want it published here. The doc is 1.3 MB (as .sxw), and the figures given are the same even without the images (which are linked to, not inline). I was saving the doc to the local harddisk. The problem is still the same in OOo1.9.109. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 51103] Conditional formatting no t working properly wuen duplicating a sheet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|REOPENED Issue type|DEFECT|ENHANCEMENT Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 13:26:30 -0700 2005 --- OK, I reopen this issue as enhancement. So it should be clear that, even though the addressing works as programmers might expect it to work, the behaviour is not intuitive to the user and should be improved. I strongly support the solution proposed by lamberete that no sheet reference is included if the referenced cell is inside the sema sheet. The workaround with the $ is nice, but I daresay most people won't have the intuition to find this out by themselves. ;-) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 51103] Conditional formatting no t working properly wuen duplicating a sheet
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'matthiasbasler' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|needmoreinfo |oooqa --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 4 09:58:46 -0700 2005 --- Confirmed with OOO1.9.109 on a PC with WinXP SP2. I think, absolute adressing is fine in principle, but when it points to the sheet being copied it must be adjusted to point to its copy afterwards. - as lamberete suggests. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
