[amsat-bb] Re: ISS orbit - was: SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation

2011-03-08 Thread Rocky Jones

the end of shuttle ops will mean a higher orbit...there are other cool things 
happening like a new cubesat launcher mechanism.

Robert Oler WB5MZO

 From: g.shirvi...@btinternet.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; ve3...@cogeco.ca
 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:51:32 +
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  ISS orbit - was: SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation
 
 Hi All,
 
 This page refers to a major orbit boost planned for sometime after June? 
 using the ATV as a big thruster
 
 http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/02/live-atv-2-prepares-for-docking-to-international-space-station/
 
 No doubt this will seriously change the TLEs!
 
 It will improve the footprint/pass durations  but reduce the visual 
 brightness I suppose.
 
 Something to look forward to!
 
 cheers
 
 Graham 
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation

2011-03-08 Thread Rocky Jones

HMMMnot for sure of who flies these days with the shuttle docked...but the 
shuttle orbiter is a crummy reboost tool for ISS...the engines point the wrong 
way while docked...Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 03:25:36 -0800
 From: ka1...@yahoo.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; ve3...@cogeco.ca
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation
 
 
 It is possible there was an orbit change thrust performed after the shuttle 
 docked.
 When the Shuttle docks with ISS, the ISS autopilot is turned OFF.
 The Shuttles autopilot takes over for the duration of the flight.
 
 
 
 --- On Sun, 3/6/11, Marc Tessier - VE3TES ve3...@cogeco.ca wrote:
 
  From: Marc Tessier - VE3TES ve3...@cogeco.ca
  Subject: [amsat-bb]  SATPC32 ISS Showing weird operation
  To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
  Date: Sunday, March 6, 2011, 12:21 PM
  Hello group, after finally getting my
  SSB part of the station fully operational, I then moved on
  to getting my packet operations up and running , and with
  great success, one wee  problem, I have noticed this
  when tracking the ISS, I am able to still digipeat off the
  station even long after it is supposed to be beyond the
  horizon according to my Satpc32 ISS software. My keps are up
  to date via the Satpc32 software, is there a error due to
  the large amount of mass now docked on the ISS? or have the
  keps not be uploaded in a timely fashion to the server I get
  my keps from?...
  
  Run down of my operation conditions here are as follows...
  
  Radio  - Kenwood TS2000
  Software SATPC32 + Satpc32 ISS
  PC - Dell P4 2.4Ghz CPU with internet connection
  
  Is there another method of getting my keps to show more
  accurate tracking of this big bird?...
  
  Regards,
  
  Marc Tessier - VE3TES
  ve3...@cogeco.ca
  Grid FN25pa
  
  
  
  __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version
  of virus signature database 5930 (20110306) __
  
  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
  
  http://www.eset.com
  
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org.
  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
  satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
 
 
   
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: April 12 - Yuri ARISSat-1

2011-03-03 Thread Rocky Jones

We can celebrate many things about Yuri Gagarin, but one of them is not his 
space walk.
You probably meant space flight...Alex Leoniv did the first space walk 
followed by Ed White..

As for ArISSat... oh dear.  so many thoughts...Robert G. Oler WB5MZO 5N 
something and ARRL AMSAT NARS life member 

 From: clintbradf...@mac.com
 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:53:04 -0800
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 CC: ariss-...@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  April 12 - Yuri  ARISSat-1
 
 Yes, we are all disappointed that the deployment of ARISSat-1 has been 
 delayed - in direct violation of handshakes and written agreements.
 
 But that does not mean that we should ignore the historical event that April 
 12 is bringing us: the 50th anniversary of Yuri Gagarin's space walk.
 

 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: RADAR QRM on FO-29 video on YouTube

2011-03-03 Thread Rocky Jones

It is the radar off of an E2-C...heard it many many times while playing cat and 
mouse games with it... Robert Oler WB5MZO

 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 05:04:30 +
 From: kq...@verizon.net
 To: glasbren...@mindspring.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RADAR QRM on FO-29 video on YouTube
 
 Yow, that's pretty bad, Drew.
 You're probably too far from Eglin, so you think maybe it's from MacDill?
 Jim
 
 On 03/01/2011 03:35 AM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPSvVEjrTzY
 
  This is just a short video of the severe RADAR QRM I had today while 
  trying to work FO-29. This is about as bad as I've ever seen it here in 
  Central Florida. Please ignore my son coughing in the background (he's 
  getting better fast), along with one of my male cockatiels crooning to 
  the female one. :-)
 
  73, Drew KO4MA
  ___
  Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-23 Thread Rocky Jones

It would be nice to have an Oscar IV or an Arsene working!  Robert Oler WB5MZO

From: domenico.i8...@tin.it
To: orbit...@hotmail.com; g7...@btinternet.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:16:47 +0100










- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Rocky 
  Jones 
  To: domenico.i8...@tin.it ; g7...@btinternet.com ; Amsat BB 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:16 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: Satellite 
  OPS9328 Launched 1967?
   
 By the way it is possible that the downlink frequency was 
  very close
 to the 2 meters band but I was not able to find any 
  information about
 the frequency.
 
 73 de 
 
  
 i8CVS Domenico
 
  ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed 
  are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support 
  the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

greetings...the 
  transponder downlink is in the EHF range...the telemetry signals are 
  UHF...Robert WB5MZO life member ARRL/AMSAT NARS
   

  Hi Robert, WB5MZO
   
  Tank you for the above information.Before the launch of 
  OSCAR-10 we where used to make HEO traking exercise receiving the beacon 
  of SRET-2 a france HEO satellite in Molniya 
  orbit. At that time 5 years after the launch the beacon of SRET-2 was only a 
  steady carrier transmitting very close to 146 MHz
   
   http://www.tbs-satellite.com/tse/online/sat_sret_2.html
   
   
  73 de
   
  i8CVS Domenico 
  
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-23 Thread Rocky Jones

Steve.  thank you for your gentle corrections and you are right.  Should have 
remembered that better 

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO

Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:19:45 -0600
From: melac...@verizon.net
To: orbit...@hotmail.com; g7...@btinternet.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

Two corrections:  1. The satellites were actually built by Philco-Ford, which 
later became Ford Aerospace, and is now Space Systems/Loral.(TRW built the 
DSCS-2 series of satellites.)  2. Oscar IV was not launched with IDCSP. Oscar 
IV went up in December 1965, piggybacking on the booster that launched OV2-03, 
LES-3, and LES-4. The first IDCSP launch was not until June 1966.  Steve 
MelachrinosW3HF On 02/22/11, Rocky Jonesorbit...@hotmail.com wrote:
John. Initial defense satellite communications system...The first real 
communications system that the US military had. YOu can look on the web and get 
more information...but there is an amateur radio connection. The theory of the 
satellite constellation was that the satellites were dispersed about every 20 
or so degrees in a almost 24 hour orbit which meant that they drifted across 
the sky, but slowly. This allowed multiple users by folks using different 
satellites and if one failed another was available.

They were TRW satellites and the TRW amateur radio club got permission to 
launch a ham sat (Oscar IV) with one batch of satellites. Had IV got into the 
correct orbit it too would have drifted across the sky a few degrees every 
day. All the satellites were launched on a Titan III (a IIIC if memory serves) 
which had what was called the transtage which did the final orbit insertion 
and then deployed the satellites...in the case of IV the transtage failed and 
IV and a bunch of IDSCS's birds (and another test satellite) were left in an 
orbit that was highly elliptical and short lived.

IV kind of looked like the IDSCS. 

Its great satellite history...the IDSCS satellites had a 7 year kill timer ( a 
chemical timer) but at least 6 of the kill timers had not worked.

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO 5Nsomething and ARRL/AMSAT NARS member

 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:58:42 +
 From: g7...@btinternet.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?
 
 Just been looking at the tracking site http://www.n2yo.com/satellites
 Some great stuff on this site and thanks for posting the URL to the bb.
 
 At the bottom of the amateur radio satellite page there is a listing for 
 OPS9328 
 (IDSCS 15)
 
 Were they ham satellites, I don't recal reading about them. 
 Is this just a simple mistake in the listing? 
 
 73 john g7hia.
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-22 Thread Rocky Jones




 
 By the way it is possible that the downlink frequency was very close
 to the 2 meters band but I was not able to find any information about
 the frequency.
 
 73 de 
 
 i8CVS Domenico
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

greetings...the transponder downlink is in the EHF range...the telemetry 
signals are UHF...Robert WB5MZO life member ARRL/AMSAT NARS
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?

2011-02-22 Thread Rocky Jones

John.  Initial defense satellite communications system...The first real 
communications system that the US military had.  YOu can look on the web and 
get more information...but there is an amateur radio connection.  The theory of 
the satellite constellation was that the satellites were dispersed about every 
20 or so degrees in a almost 24 hour orbit which meant that they drifted 
across the sky, but slowly.  This allowed multiple users by folks using 
different satellites and if one failed another was available.

They were TRW satellites and the TRW amateur radio club got permission to 
launch a ham sat (Oscar IV) with one batch of satellites.  Had IV got into 
the correct orbit it too would have drifted across the sky a few degrees 
every day.  All the satellites were launched on a Titan III (a IIIC if memory 
serves) which had what was called the transtage which did the final orbit 
insertion and then deployed the satellites...in the case of IV the transtage 
failed and IV and a bunch of IDSCS's birds (and another test satellite) were 
left in an orbit that was highly elliptical and short lived.

IV kind of looked like the IDSCS.  

Its great satellite history...the IDSCS satellites had a 7 year kill timer ( a 
chemical timer) but at least 6 of the kill timers had not worked.

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO 5Nsomething and ARRL/AMSAT NARS member

 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:58:42 +
 From: g7...@btinternet.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Satellite OPS9328 Launched 1967?
 
 Just been looking at the tracking sitehttp://www.n2yo.com/satellites
 Some great stuff on this site and thanks for posting the URL to the bb.
 
 At the bottom of the amateur radio satellite page there is a listing for 
 OPS9328 
 (IDSCS 15)
 
 Were they ham satellites, I don't recal reading about them. 
 Is this just a simple mistake in the listing? 
 
 73 john g7hia.
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Considerate satellite operations behavior.

2011-02-21 Thread Rocky Jones


 Thats my 2 cents worth  AGAIN
 WA4HFN Damon EM55 


I've worked the fm birds and listen to them, even in Africa (well just listened 
so far) and I am really not sure what people are expecting is going to happen 
on a single channel device that has a comparatively low access threshold 
(meaning lots of people can work it) and apparently enjoy working it.  

Put another way...I dont see how things change or even what they would change 
to given the technology.

A while back someone likened the FM birds to a DX situation and thats probably 
not all that bad.   In a way the people who are good at getting contacts on 
those birds (even with high power) are good...they have the right equipment, 
they know what works and can make it work and its their cup of tea.  It 
is not mine but as long as folks are building and flying FM single channel 
birds I suspect this is what it is going to be like...and my theory is have 
fun.

My argument with AMSAT and others is that the organization should be leading by 
pushing more linear devices AND birds with larger footprints.  Where I think 
things got off track badly was with the notion of AO-40...the theory that we 
had to build a satellite that people could work worldwide with not much 
antenna and other equipment.  Oscar 10 and 13  (along with Arsene) in my view 
is about the baseline satellite that AMSAT should be building and trying to 
lead the satellite movement.  As long as baseline satellite access is a 
handitalkie with a long whip...we are not going to see much different in my 
view nor should we expect it

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO life member Amsat/Arrl/NARS 5Nsomething soon
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 test

2011-02-14 Thread Rocky Jones

One more curious thing

If the sat package can be switched on and run for some period of 
time...then why not just keep it on the space station and hook it up to 
external power...and well then its a better package...?  Because if it cannot 
be hooked up to external power and the battery situation dealt with then the 
batteries for the Orlan suit) are well going to drain pretty fast given the 
current use...

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO

 Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:09:28 +
 From: m5...@yahoo.co.uk
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 test
 
 --- On Sun, 13/2/11, g0...@aol.com g0...@aol.com wrote:
  I wonder if it will sit until July?
   
  After all the Russians KEDR name reflects the upcoming
  anniversary of Yuri  
  Gagarin's flight into space. That was 50yrs ago on 12th
  April.
   
  So many questions
 
 Indeed, the Russian Federal Space website says that Kedr (ARISSat-1) will be 
 Activated on April 12 and you can see this can be acheived by connecting 
 ARISSat-1 to the ISS antenna as they did on Feb 10. 
 
 I'd like to express my thanks to all the ARISSat team volunteers who've been 
 working so hard recently to get the telemetry decoding software, 
 Website/twitter and other activites all ready for Feb 16. The deployment of 
 ARISSat-1 was originally planned for the end of Feb and was then brought 
 forward by 2 weeks so the volunteers must have been working flat out to get 
 everything ready. 
 
 It now looks like we have to wait until July for deployment but that's Space 
 for you, it's a high risk arena - nothings certain. I look forward to July. 
 
 73 Trevor M5AKA
 
 
 
   
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 test

2011-02-14 Thread Rocky Jones

 Indeed, the Russian Federal Space website says that Kedr 
(ARISSat-1) will be Activated on April 12 and you can see this can be 
acheived by connecting ARISSat-1 to the ISS antenna as they did on Feb 
10..

curious how that works with battery life.  It is kind of interesting that the 
Energia folks seem to have thought this one up on their own, it seems to have 
caught the AMSAT folks a tad by surprise...

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Batteries

2011-02-14 Thread Rocky Jones

Clint...I will be surprised if the battery last well a month.

The environment in the Orlan suits is very very unique.  The battery is not 
designed for the charge/discharge cycles of a free flyer...and as I recall the 
Russians keep good tabs on the charge/discharge cycles of the batteries...

Your statement is an accurate summary...but I suspect that the Russians know 
something here Robert G. Oler WB5MZO  

CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
From: clintbradf...@mac.com
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb]  ARISSat-1 - Batteries
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:04:55 -0800
To: orbit...@hotmail.com



My comment was an accurate summary of what was posted on the Roscosmos PAO 
site. But it certainly doesn;t necessary reflect reality.
I can very easily see how the information could have been misinterpreted ... or 
mis-stated.
I mean, the batteries aren't going to give out in two months' time. Can't you 
see someone stating in a media session, We're afraid the satellite will decay 
in two months ...  and that being written up as, The batteries aren't going 
to last.
The past 72 hours have shown to me that the best media filtering - being 
defined as receiving info and validating it is being produced by AMSAT-NA and 
the ARISSat-1 team, and reflected on their respective Web sites.
Just Clint's opinion, of course.
Clint, K6LCS  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Batteries

2011-02-14 Thread Rocky Jones

This seems to have caught the AMSAT folks by surprise...I would be curious 
about any comments from them.

Having said that...someone somewhere should at least be doing a thought 
experiment about what would have to happen to leave the payload in the station 
as a permanent device...not as a free flyer.

The Russians have dealt with any real objections that could be raised about the 
operation of the payload on the station...most of the ones that would be 
studied to death would come from NASA, but clearly the Russians dont care (as 
they frequently dont) so they are fine with it operating.

Based on the op time already if the battery is not recharged, the bat does not 
have much life left in it...and if it is not recharged after the use on the 
12th it will likely have no life...that will limit enormously the payload use 
of the free flyer.

I can think of three legitimate issues with the payload staying on the station 
(and these are just off the top of my head).

Thermal...the thing was designed as a free flyerwith temp extremes far greater 
then on the station so...
Power...some other information indicates that a cable would have to go up to 
the station probably need some power interface stuff...
Storage...the payload is not in a package good for internal use.


The entire thing is kind of interesting...


Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Life member AMSATARRL

From: clintbradf...@mac.com
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:15:44 -0800
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb]  ARISSat-1 - Batteries

The Russians didn't think ARISSat-1's batteries would last from Feb 16 to April 
12 - April 12 being the anniversary of Gagarin's historic 1961 flight.
 
Kedr to Be Switched on in the ISS on April 12

15.02.2011

Russian cosmonauts Dmitry Kondratiev and Oleg Skripochka won�t launch small 
spacecraft Kedr during their spacewalk scheduled for Feb.16, Roscosmos Stats 
Secretary, Deputy Head Vitaly Davydov told news media. 
According to him, the idea is to switch on Kedr inside the ISS on April 12, in 
order to commemorate the jubilee of Yury Gagarin�s mission. Weak batteries of 
the RF-amateur satellite won�t let it fly and transmit signals until this date, 
if the satellite is launched on Feb. 16. 

Small spacecraft Kedr developed under the RadioSkaf experiment bears the name 
adopted by Yu.A. Gagarin call sign in his historical flight, namely Kedr. The 
satellite�s signal will be transmitted at radio amateur frequency of 145.95 
MHz. Kedr has radio amateur call sign RS1S.

RadioSkaf is implemented in the framework of UNESCO�s student space education 
program.
 
Roscosmos PAO
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb   
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ARISSat-1 test

2011-02-12 Thread Rocky Jones

Interesting comments:
 
During the test, RSC-Energia decided to keep the transmitter on 
until Friday morning. 

Hmmm curious about a few things but... what impact this test has had on 
battery life, considering the vehicle now sits until at least July...

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO life member AMSAT/ARRL soon to be NAARS and 5Nsomething
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question

2011-02-11 Thread Rocky Jones

Hello All.. A basic rule of the internets is in the discussion of orbits when 
Hohmann transfers are brought up the easy discussion is over (grin)...but 
everyone below has the essential points.  When a velocity vector modification 
is made in an orbit the area  rule means that the changes to the orbit are 
increasingly felt as the antipodal or 180 degree point is approached.  IN 
addition of course other factors act on the orbit and as Bob described it in 
the cares of ARISSAT the main one would be drag as the probe has a lot less 
mass then the space station...this will quickly remove the satellite from the 
orbital altitude of the station...although Bob is correct in a perfect world 
the satellite and ISS would meet again one orbit later.  There is a great deal 
of difference in prox ops and long term orbit modifications.

This is not initiative.  The closest thing to it is in basic pilot training 
teaching the notion of a turn around a point.  Here the change vector is 
wind and it takes a bit of instruction to recognize that any changes made now 
do not really manifest themselves until about 90 degrees later.

There are several strange things that celestial mechanics drive.  It took 
sometime to recognize that when the shuttle and station dock, the center of 
gravity of both vehicles combine to move the CG well outside the combined 
stack.  (think of how the shuttle  VRS say how a Progress docks as well as the 
relative mass of the vehicles).  This eventually drove changes in the docking 
and latching procedure.

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Life Member AMSAT/ARRL and NARA and soon to be 5N 
something.





 CC: orbit...@hotmail.com; ko6th_g...@hotmail.com; g0...@aol.com; 
 clintbradf...@mac.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 From: saguaroas...@cox.net
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:51:12 -0700
 To: bruni...@usna.edu
 
 This time I'll actually type something before hitting send;)
 
 The two burn maneuver is essentially a Hohmann transfer maneuver. The point 
 of the first burn becomes the new  apogee or perigee (depending on the 
 direction of the burn). The burn will raise or lower the antipodal point from 
 where the burn occurred. At that point a second burn in the same direction 
 will bring the point of the first burn to the new level. 
 
 But you all probably already knew that:)
 
 If you want to play around with this try this:
 
 http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/home.php
 
 
 Sent from my iPod
 Rick Tejera
 Editor, SACnews
 Saguaro Astronomy Club
 www.saguaroastro.org
 K7TEJ
 
 On Feb 10, 2011, at 17:17, Bob Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu wrote:
 
  a retrograde maneuver will remove ARISSsat from 
  the proximity of ISS very very quickly.  
  
  It is interesting that any such one-thrust (arm throw) maneuver will then
  intersect the ISS exactly one orbit later. In theory that is.  But the
  difference in drag at that low altitude will usually be enough to have a
  safe miss distance on the next and subsequent orbits.
  
  I think that is why most space maneuvers require two burns.  One to start a
  new orbit (but it will still intersect the original orbit on every orbit.
  Then a second burn somewhere else in the orbit to get rid of that
  intersecting point?
  
  Bob, WB4APR
  
  ... Clint.  When ARISSAT is released it will stay in the Plane of
  ISS
  orbit...they will toss it retrograde meaning in the opposite direction
  of
  the  velocity vector and with its slightly lower velocity the orbit will
  start to  decrease...this is done so that very quickly the orbits will
  stop
  being prox  ops reasonably fast.
  
  If so, then I believe as the orbit altitude is reduced, the apparent
  velocity increases.(??) which will cause ARISsat-1 to 'move ahead'
  of the
  ISS over a few hours
  
  But didn't we say the velocity would be less than the ISS due to the
  method
  of deploying it against the velocity vector ?
  
  
  Interesting puzzler, eh?  From what I have read in the past, I think this
  their logic.
  
  What they are trying to do is to separate the orbits of the ISS and
  ARISSat as quickly as possible, to avoid the potential for a collision.
  Consider the options:
  
  1.  Throw it sideways to the ISS orbit.  The result is that twice per
  orbit the two spacecraft's paths will cross, side to side.  Bad idea.
  
  2.  Throw it ahead of the ISS (faster orbit speed).  This will raise the
  orbit, slightly, and also make it a bit elliptical (up and down).  The
  higher orbit makes the satellite go behind the ISS, but the elliptical shape
  also means that the orbits will cross every orbit (but out of phase, so they
  won't be at the same place when they do).  But, then as the ARISSat orbit
  decays, they will get closer and closer, potentially getting back to the
  same place.  Not good, either.
  
  3.  Throw it behind the ISS (slower orbit).  As you note, this will lower
  the orbit (and make it a bit elliptical), and initially the apogee of the
  

[amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question

2011-02-10 Thread Rocky Jones

Celestial mechanics is a brain teaser...but most of what has been said here is 
more or less correct.  The trick is to realize that the ONLY orbit where the 
velocities (and energy)  are constant is a perfectly circular one...and 
that really doesnt happen but in theory (although some come very close)...a 
retrograde manuever will remove ARISSsat from the proximity of ISS very very 
quickly.  Robert G. Oler WB5MZO

 From: ko6th_g...@hotmail.com
 To: g0...@aol.com; clintbradf...@mac.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:12:28 -0800
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
 
 
 
 
  From: g0...@aol.com
  Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:45:36 -0500
  To: clintbradf...@mac.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
  Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ARISSat-1 - Dumb Question
  
   
  In a message dated 09/02/2011 06:08:45 GMT Standard Time,  
  clintbradf...@mac.com writes:
  
... Clint.  When ARISSAT is released it will stay in the Plane of ISS 
   orbit...they will toss it retrograde meaning in the opposite direction of 
  the  velocity vector and with its slightly lower velocity the orbit will 
  start to  decrease...this is done so that very quickly the orbits will stop 
  being prox  ops reasonably fast.  
  
  Great, succinct info - MANY  thanks!
  
  Clint, K6LCS
  
  
  
  
  
  Hmm.  This is a bit of a brain teaser...
   
  So if the satellite is deployed towards the rear of the ISS, it's  velocity 
  will be slightly lower. 
  So does that mean it will go to a lower orbit- (Same as firing retros  to 
  reenter)?
   
  If so, then I believe as the orbit altitude is reduced, the apparent  
  velocity increases.(??) which will cause ARISsat-1 to 'move ahead' of 
  the  
  ISS over a few hours
   
  But didn't we say the velocity would be less than the ISS due to the method 
   of deploying it against the velocity vector ?
   
  Time for me to have a Tuna sandwich. We all know it's probably full of  
  Dolphin...and they are really clever.
   
  David G0MRF
   
 
 
 Interesting puzzler, eh?  From what I have read in the past, I think this 
 their logic.
 
 What they are trying to do is to separate the orbits of the ISS and ARISSat 
 as quickly as possible, to avoid the potential for a collision.  Consider the 
 options:
 
 1.  Throw it sideways to the ISS orbit.  The result is that twice per orbit 
 the two spacecraft's paths will cross, side to side.  Bad idea.
 
 2.  Throw it ahead of the ISS (faster orbit speed).  This will raise the 
 orbit, slightly, and also make it a bit elliptical (up and down).  The higher 
 orbit makes the satellite go behind the ISS, but the elliptical shape also 
 means that the orbits will cross every orbit (but out of phase, so they won't 
 be at the same place when they do).  But, then as the ARISSat orbit decays, 
 they will get closer and closer, potentially getting back to the same place.  
 Not good, either.
 
 3.  Throw it behind the ISS (slower orbit).  As you note, this will lower the 
 orbit (and make it a bit elliptical), and initially the apogee of the orbit 
 will intersect that of the ISS.  Being in a lower orbit, ARISSat will move 
 ahead of the ISS, and over time, as the ARISSat orbit decays, the two will 
 diverge even farther.  So, this is the safest.
 
 At least, I think that's the logic.  If not, pass me some of that tuna...
 
 Greg  KO6TH
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Antenna Observations/Question

2011-01-23 Thread Rocky Jones

Rick.

on the cheap antenna front I've tried and had pretty good success with two 
things.

First there is a 5 element Yagi design that was published in QST that 
uses/modifies an Archer 5 element FM yagi.  I built one and added some 70 cm 
elements 90 out of phase and thats worked great.  My home QTH is in a bit of 
flux (we are moving to a farm out by Santa Fe Tx from my home QTH in Clear Lake 
TX) so I built another one, put them both on a boom 90 degrees out in an X 
configuration, stuck them at 33 degrees and they work well.  I will keep them 
once we move into the perm QTH.

I've also used the crossed dipoles and Lindenblad antenna from QST (not the 
AMSAT one) and they work great.  I modified one for WX satellite reception and 
am very happy with them.

I am in Nigeria now and have a modified Lindenblad for my WX station here but 
its copied really well most of the two meter Oscars including AO-7.   I didnt 
have Nigerian operating authority when I left the states (but now have a five 
year license) so I didnt bring any transmit equipment...but from the roof of 
the Sheraton in Abuja the WX version works great.  I've got permission to set 
up permanent antennas on the Sheraton and I will be back so am going to have 
some good operating here.

I would upload pictures, but I tried to upload some of the really big HF array 
on the road to the airport and they never showed up...if you want some pictures 
of what I have at home I will be happy to send them to you.  IN about two weeks!

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Life member Amsat/ARRL

 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:47:10 -0500
 From: rjl...@gmail.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Antenna Observations/Question
 
 I've been on the birds off an on for years. I have an M2 cir. polarized pair
 at home QTH and am looking into a more modest installation for a summer
 cottage. I've built the K5OE eggbeater imitations and founds them to be only
 fair.I could by M2 eggbeater pair but I'm trying to do this on less $. I
 also have an Arrow antenna which I've tried some with a HT with only fair
 results. Any other suggestions out there? Mount the Arrow more permanently
 but at a fixed elevation and use a simple rotor to change azimuth? How about
 a homebrewed quagi? Any suggestions appreciated.
 
 Rick
 W2JAZ
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Eclipse Seen from Space

2011-01-08 Thread Rocky Jones

I just missed it...correct continent (AFrica) but to far south (Ivory 
Coast)...good news is that I will be back and have in works a Chad, Nigeria, 
and Congo reciprocal license...with a good operating room agreement with the 
Sheraton Abuja...The Sheraton is going to let me put up some permanent 
antennas...

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO life member ARRL AMSAT

 From: clintbradf...@mac.com
 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:40:58 -0800
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Eclipse Seen from Space
 
 Eclipse, as seen by Hinode satellite January 4 ...
 
 http://bcove.me/57037ei2
 
 Clint
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Is it possible to work LEO sats (FM or SSB) with antennas in attic?

2010-12-27 Thread Rocky Jones

Dave.  It is not ideal, but I've made it work even on Oscar 6 and 7 from a 
college dorm (until I snuck the antennas up on the roof...)

There is an entire group of articles by Steve Ford of the ARRL about what I 
call low impact Oscar antennas (including Attic ones).  I've seen him post on 
this forum and you probably can reach him through ARRL (he has responded to 
me!).  I bet he can point you in some general directions of things he has tried 
and the results he has had.

His articles are technically solid, well written, and fun to read...

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO ARRL Life Member AMSAT life member

 Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:59:42 -0500
 From: david.n2...@gmail.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Is it possible to work LEO sats (FM or SSB) with  
 antennas in attic?
 
 I have HOA rules that prevent me from putting antennas on the roof
 where I live.  However, I can put antennas in the attic.  I have an
 Az/El setup that I could mount up in the attic, but wanted to get some
 feedback from folks on any experience they've had working the LEO
 satellites with antennas in the attic.
 
 Thanks!
 - Dave N2TEB
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Amateur Satellite Frequency Allocations (LF)

2010-12-12 Thread Rocky Jones

Art..one of the best explanations I have read of the allocations.  FB

Robert WB5MZO Life member Amsat ARRL

 From: afel...@ieee.org
 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:18:31 -0500
 To: m5...@yahoo.co.uk
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Amateur Satellite Frequency Allocations (LF)
 
 Hi, Tevor!
 
 The general principle is that the amateur-satellite service has frequency 
 allocations in bands where the amateur service has frequency allocations in 
 all three ITU regions.  The only exceptions are in the bands 1260-1270 MHz 
 and 5650-5670 MHz, which are limited to the Earth-to-space direction, and 
 3400-3410 MHz, which are available in Regions 2 and 3.  See RR 5.282.
 
 In Region 2, the band 7100-7200 kHz was reallocated effective 29 MAR 2009.  
 See: RR 5.142.
 
   Until 29 March 2009, the use of the band 7100-7300 kHz in Region 2 by 
 the amateur service shall not impose constraints on the broadcasting service 
 intended for use within Region 1 and Region 3. After 29 March 2009 the use of 
 the band 7200-7300 kHz in Region 2 by the amateur service shall not impose 
 constraints on the broadcasting service intended for use within Region 1 and 
 Region 3.  RR 5.142.
 
 But, this is only in Region 2.  So, until broadcasters vacate 7100-7200 in 
 regions 1 and 3, the amateur-satellite service won't have a frequency 
 allocation.
 
 Make sense??
 
 73, art.
 W4ART  Arlington VA
 
 On 12-Dec-2010, at 03:37 PM, Trevor . wrote:
 
  IARU has been successfull in obtaining new global Amateur Service 
  allocations such as 135 kHz and 7.1-7.2 kHz, however, the Amateur Satellite 
  Service seems to have been forgotten. 7.0-7.1 is okay for sats but 7.1-7.2 
  isn't, Why? is the question that has to be asked.
  
  Currently IARU is attempting to get an Amateur Service allocation at 500kHz 
  - should they also be getting that band for the Amateur Satellite Service 
  as well ?
  
  Given the significant input of the ARRL into IARU perhaps amsat-bb members 
  in NA could remind ARRL that, where possible, new Amateur allocations 
  should be obtained for BOTH the Amateur and Amateur Satellite Services not 
  just the Amateur Service.
  
  73 Trevor M5AKA
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 
 
 Nullum gratuitum prandium.
 
 
http://afeller.us
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] VHF and the space station

2010-06-25 Thread Rocky Jones

http://onorbit.com/node/2309

interesting story

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO life member AMSAT ARRL
  
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Board of Directors Candidates

2010-06-17 Thread Rocky Jones



 
 Just have a look at PE1RAH William Leijenaar web page 
 http://www.qsl.net/pe1rah/
 
 and look at his nano sat transponder satellite
 
 http://www.qsl.net/pe1rah/mysat2.htm
 

 
 Luc Leblanc VE2DWE
 Skype VE2DWE
 www.qsl.net/ve2dwe
 DSTAR urcall VE2DWE
 WAC BASIC CW PHONE SATELLITE
 
  

It is a clever device.  I've never been clear as to why AMSAT NA is not using 
it.  Works great on the Indian satellite..

Robert G. Oler  WB5MZO Life member AMSAT ARRL
  
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: IKAROS Solar Sail Successfully Deployed

2010-06-12 Thread Rocky Jones

It is headed to  Venus (or there abouts) and it went out of range of my 8 ghz 
system the other day...pretty neat.

Robert G. Oler

 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:39:30 -0500
 From: reid.cr...@gmail.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: IKAROS Solar Sail Successfully Deployed
 
 Is there anyway to track this?
 
 On 6/11/2010 9:38 AM, B J wrote:
  http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2010/06/20100611_ikaros_e.html
 
  73s
 
  Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
 
 
 
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendarocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Tracking Falcon 9's Dragon Payload In Real Time

2010-06-09 Thread Rocky Jones

Bill.  there are none now.  The vehicle was powered in total by batteries 
(second stage and the Dragon mockup) and they have expired.  The vehicle is 
essentially inert now.  Decay is expected about 21 June give or take. Next 
launch with a full up Dragon is this summer.  They have some roll control 
issues to deal with and a few other things...Robert G. Oler WB5MZO Life member 
AMSAT ARRL

 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:25:38 -0700
 From: b...@hsmicrowave.com
 To: top_gun_can...@yahoo.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tracking Falcon 9's Dragon Payload In Real Time
 
 Does anyone have any idea if there are any signals to track?
 
 Regards...Bill - N6GHz
 
 B J wrote:
  http://www.n2yo.com/?s=36595
  
  73s
  
  Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
  
  
  
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccountocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] a call for secondary payloads

2010-03-27 Thread Rocky Jones

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1003/27iridium/`

these are all going on Musk Falcon.  Robert WB5MZO Life member AMSAT ARRL
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850552/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] NASA cubesats...

2010-02-27 Thread Rocky Jones

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=30294

there are going to be more ballast payloads particularly as commercial ops to 
the space station gens up.  Just saw a thing today where almost all the folks 
who are planning to do commercial ops are looking at ballast rides.

Robert G. Oler Life member AMSAT ARRL
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Excellent Supplier of RF Adaptors

2010-01-24 Thread Rocky Jones

I'l second that about Dave's shop.  Never a complaint.  Robert WB5MZO Life 
member AMSAT ARRL

 From: lafri...@earthlink.net
 To: morse...@optonline.net; rswa...@twcny.rr.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:34:12 -0800
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Excellent Supplier of RF Adaptors
 
 The best supplier that I found on the web - from E-Bay is 
 http://www.daveshobbyshop.com/
 
 They have a very large selection of  RF adaptors, their prices are quite 
 good, and they ship immediately.
 
 Have ordered both Male and Female to SO-239 connectors from them.
 
 73,
 Jim , N6MV
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dee morse...@optonline.net
 To: rswa...@twcny.rr.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 7:13 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: RF Adaptors
 
 
  Before you go ordering through the mail (most efficient way)  Check 
  your
  local Radio Shack. I went in there and was surprised at the selection 
  on the
  wall.
  73,
  Dee, NB2F
 
  -Original Message-
  From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] 
  On
  Behalf Of Randy
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:01 PM
  To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
  Subject: [amsat-bb] RF Adaptors
 
  Does anyone know where I can get
  An adaptor that is N-TYPE Male to SO-239 ( FEMALE PL259 ) ??
 
  Randy - N2CUA
 
 
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
  author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
  program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
  author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
  program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
 
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Chinese GPS system

2010-01-18 Thread Rocky Jones

Hmm...it certainly would under certain circumstances raise the noise floor for 
a space RX...but a lot would depend on the analysis given the spacecrafts orbit 
 RX antenna, etc.  I can see times when the affect would not be that bad.  I 
assume that the PRC vehicles will have some sort of beam shaping...

Robert WB5MZO life member AMSAT ARRL

 Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:54:17 -0500
 From: rwmcgw...@gmail.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Chinese GPS system
 
 Mode L anyone?
 
 We will lose that entire region as an uplink in an upcoming WARC would 
 be my current estimate.
 
 
 
 
 On 1/18/2010 4:02 AM, Trevor . wrote:
  China launched the navigational satellite BeiDou-2 a couple of days ago. 
  The system is reported to use 1256.52-1280.52 MHz
 
  http://www.southgatearc.org/news/january2010/china_launches_beidou2.htm
 
  73 Trevor M5AKA
 
 
 
 -- 
 (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
 Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
 NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
 the only people for me are the mad ones,
   the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk,
   mad to be saved, desirous of everything at
   the same time, the ones who never yawn or
   say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
   like fabulous yellow roman candles Kerouac
 Twitter:rwmcgwier
 Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Life Members

2010-01-17 Thread Rocky Jones

Glen.  while I might quibble with some numbers, the sentiments you expressed 
are right on.



The pejorative statements that a few made about life members (old etc)
as well as the claim that people who are life members are making claims
which are never stated, by saying that they are life members were
completely inappropriate.  It lacked knowledge and competence.  



In my view at least one of the BOD should have risen to the defense of
the concept of life membership AND should have stated the obvious
financial benefits to the organization of LM.  While also urging all to 
participate in the LM concept.  



Have a great Sunday.



Robert WB5MZO Life Member ARRL AMSAT

 Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:03:01 -0800
 From: gz...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Life Members
 To: k...@live.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org; orbit...@hotmail.com
 
 Having been a life member (# 463) since the very early days when life 
 membership was first offered I would like to point out that, back then, 
 life membership wasn't that cheap.  In today's dollars, not absolute 
 dollars, is a pretty staggering sum!
 
 Based on the consumer price index, the $50 that I spent for my life 
 membership back around 1970 is today the equivalent of right at $3300!  That 
 is 66 times in absolute dollars.  Compare that to the present life 
 membership fee of $880.  That means that we who obtained our life memberships 
 back in the early 1970s paid 3.75 times what new life members are paying.
 
 If you don't believe these figures then do the calculations on the following 
 website:
 
 http://www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/
 
 However, the cash influx to AMSAT, at the time, was definitely needed and the 
 benefits from the life membership fees of today's olde tymers allowed AMSAT 
 to accomplish a lot of things which would not have been possible without the 
 influx of cash.
 
 Therefore, I caution those who think that life members are getting a free 
 ride to stop and think about the true situation.  If it had not been for the 
 olde tyme life membership fees the organization would not be what it is 
 today IF the organization was still in existence!  We olde tymers happily 
 paid a premium (when compared with the present value of the dollar) to 
 support the organization.  Today, many of us are on fixed incomes and 
 without our life memberships many of us would not be able to afford 
 continuing our memberships.  When the going was tough, the tough got going 
 and contributed a significant amount of money in terms of what the dollar is 
 worth today.
 
 The result is that we paid our dues (pun intended) and AMSAT is still 
 benefiting from our monentary contributions today.  We made an investment in 
 the organization and we certainly deserve to reap any benefits from that 
 investment.
 
 Glen, K9STH
 AMSAT 239/LM 463
 
 Website:  http://k9sth.com
 
 
   
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Life Membership

2010-01-17 Thread Rocky Jones


 
 What have you done for AMSAT recently? - is a much more appropriate 
 discussion.
 
 Clint Bradford, K6LCS
 AMSAT President's Club member - for each of the past few years
 AMSAT benefactor
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Of course...then we should ask how the board (or boards) have managed to be a 
satellite organization that is practically out of satellites.

Robert WB5MZO  Life Member
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for mailing lists

2010-01-16 Thread Rocky Jones

Bbo.  so clever.

this is how the leaders of Amsat, you know the ones who somewhere in a 
discussion (and I see you reached this stage as well) start to tell everyone 
none of this discussion is launching anything into space... people blow fuses.

YOU personalized the discussion.  Until your post, the discussion was about 
concepts...but YOU went into and made it a personal engagement.  

it is along with the nothing is helping us launch satellites the last refugee 
of people trying to defend something that is essentially not defense able  Have 
a great weekend...go out and do something...it will help that blood pressure.  

Robert WB5MZO life member AMSAT ARRL

 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:50:42 -0500
 From: rwmcgw...@gmail.com
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for mailing 
 lists
 
 Well please.  Let me jump right in doing everything you tell me to do...
 
 
 NOT
 
 
 Signed,
 
 
 On 1/15/2010 3:43 PM, Rocky Jones wrote:
  This is almost farcical.  Unable to launch effective satellites and more
  or less flailing as an organization the board has now turned to a
  acceptable use policy which is so broad as to be useless...it boils down
  to things we like are good and things we dont like are bad.
 
  entertaining
 
  Robert WB5MZO (All posts should include the author's first name and call
  sign, or full name if not currently licensed.) I will add Life member
 
 
 
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:11:41 -0500
From: rwmcgw...@gmail.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for
  mailing lists
   
This is welcome and it took entirely too long. Its effectiveness will
entirely be determined by enforcement: swift and sure.
   
   
73's
Bob
N4HY
   
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for mailing lists

2010-01-16 Thread Rocky Jones

Bob

when it gets personal (because of life members like you) that is when I get 
out of the discussion...and urge other people to as well.  Go out enjoy the 
weekend, solder something do anything to blow down.  I will. I will help...last 
pass for me.  take the closing shot if you want it.  

have a great Saturday...since coming home I try and I have embraced the line 
from the song I am so glad I am standing here today.

take care  make it a great day.

Robert WB5MZO life member AMSAT ARRL

 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 08:44:45 -0500
 From: rwmcgw...@gmail.com
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for mailing 
 lists
 
 Because of life members like you, I can assure you I am not now and will 
 not be in the future, a leader of AMSAT. I out of the game. I have not 
 taken a call from an AMSAT leader in nearly two years.  The only 
 notifications I get are on the advisors list. So as a leader, I am next 
 to useless since I have no role and am not actively seeking one.  I want 
 to do engineering should the need arise (but I am not holding my breath 
 to tell you the truth).  I have personally had all of the crap here I 
 can tolerate as a volunteer leader. As for you,  I would have long ago 
 taken the pitiful excuse of a life membership donation you gave to AMSAT 
 and returned it to you, with interest, and returned it to you.
 
 Please list for us the positive contributions you have made to the 
 organization since you gave it your dues ages ago.
 
 Bob McGwier, N4HY
 Life Member AMSAT and ARRL
 
 P.S. And by the way.  I have done a few other minor things along the way 
 in addition to giving these organizations less money than I spend on 
 coffee in a year.
 
 
 
 On 1/16/2010 8:35 AM, Rocky Jones wrote:
  Bbo.  so clever.
 
  this is how the leaders of Amsat, you know the ones who somewhere in a
  discussion (and I see you reached this stage as well) start to tell
  everyone none of this discussion is launching anything into space...
  people blow fuses.
 
  YOU personalized the discussion. Until your post, the discussion was
  about concepts...but YOU went into and made it a personal engagement.
 
  it is along with the nothing is helping us launch satellites the last
  refugee of people trying to defend something that is essentially not
  defense able Have a great weekend...go out and do something...it will
  help that blood pressure.
 
  Robert WB5MZO life member AMSAT ARRL
 
 -- 
 (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
 Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
 NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
 the only people for me are the mad ones,
   the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk,
   mad to be saved, desirous of everything at
   the same time, the ones who never yawn or
   say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
   like fabulous yellow roman candles Kerouac
 Twitter:rwmcgwier
 Active: Facebook,Myspace,LinkedIn
 
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 feat!

2010-01-16 Thread Rocky Jones

outstanding...

Robert WB5MZO Life member

 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:40:15 +
 From: w7...@comcast.net
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  AO-7 feat!
 
 
 
 To break away from the current irrelevant thread.  A momentous QSO from WC7V 
 in DN45 to RN1NW in KP71 took place today on AO-7.  The distance is about 
 7659 km.  Great going guys! Stretching to foot print is always a 
 challenge and fun.  I now return you to the current round of bs. 
 
 
   
 
 73 Bob W7LRD 
 Washington State AMSAT area coordinator 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 25

2010-01-16 Thread Rocky Jones



 From: kevin.j.sm...@comcast.net
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 25
 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:35:01 -0500
 
 Robert,
 
 Of course you would give a D minus.   (I thought Clinton's analogy had
 merit but then I guess I am among the ignorant.)
 
 
 Kevin, N3HKQ

kevin.  I dont think you will find a post where I make the claim you do (Your 
arguments, comparisons and
 analogies are always spot on and relevant while everyone else's is
 hopelessly and haplessly off the mark.) such a claim is the definition of 
 hubris and if I do make a comparison you are free to try and refute it or 
 state how it flounders.

I believe Clinton's flounders because to compare a board which is open in the 
public domain to private property which is at the heart of a Free Republic is 
in my view cheapening of both the concepts of speech and private property.

Having traveled a tad in the world I have come even more so to value both 
notions.

As for saving people from themselves.  I learned a long time ago that people 
who have no personal responsibility can as adults not be taught it...it is a 
personal thing

Robert WB5MZO Life Member AMSAT ARRL



  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Life Members

2010-01-16 Thread Rocky Jones


 
 Since we are going down that path, I just wanted you to know that when I 
 read Life Member I hear the words cheap, discount, looking for a 
 deal, old fart in my head.
 

 
 Jeff, KE9V 
 
Jeff. I am sure you do and thanks for sharing.  It takes a bit of 
sophistication and some knowledge to get past that simplistic understanding.  

perpetual memberships if managed correctly (and with AMSAT I realize that is 
a big IF) are not a gift soley for the member, ie give them cheap 
membership for life...they really are a gift for the organization and generally 
are a win win for both the member and the organization.

BOD who set up perpetual memberships (USNI, ARRL The TAMU Association of Former 
Students to name three varying groups) dont do it just to give people cheap 
membership.  They do it to allow the organization base money which when 
properly invested returns yearly far more then the membership cost (ie the 
magazine a percentage of member services etc).

Obviously if an 18 year old invest in a perpetual membership and then succumbs 
within a few years...there is some money made...but if done correctly the 18 
year olds membership will still be paying for the member services (again the 
mag etc) when the 18 year old is many many years older (far older then just the 
life membership divided by the average yearly cost of membership over a period 
of years).  

The block money over a given year is invested in a basic block investment 
(meaning the preceeding years) and the interest alone, more then works out.  In 
addition done smartly the sum while drawing interest can be low interest 
borrowed against.

when I was President of The community association that our house in Clear Lake 
is a part of (and it is far larger then AMSAT NA)...we started life 
memberships to the various facilities which were also available on a year to 
year basis fee.  It wasnt hard to set it up...a major brokerage firm did it for 
us...and we make money on a life membership that last for 40 years (and that 
was only because the timelines couldnt be run out any farther) EVEN IF 50 
percent of the residential property owners took advantage of the offer.  

A classmate  manages life membership for USNI (United States Naval Institute) 
and a few other groups... and  they make money on it...and that includes 
memberships that start at 22.  When I was investigating perpetual memberships 
for our association I was told by this person that USNI would make money if 
over 50 percent of those applying for membership at 22 took life membership.  

I know you need both an arguing point, and doubtless have not thought the issue 
of life membership through all that much.  Have fun with the arguing point, I 
am sure it makes you feel great...

 but like most gut feelings it is wrong.  If AMSAT is not making money off of 
a life membership then someone somewhere really fracked up.   And sadly it 
would not surprise me.


Sorry to burst your bubble.

I became a life member (and urge others to do the same) because it gives the 
organization a baseline of financing which to survive.  
Robert WB5MZO Life Member
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: LEO/cube sat for sale 8000$

2010-01-16 Thread Rocky Jones

Luc...while one hopes..there is in addition to your point, almost no chance 
that this launcher will fly.  There are very very big changes coming to human 
spaceflight in the US..and Falcon is the launch vehicle to (in my view) bet on

Robert WB5MZO Life Member

 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0500
 From: b...@innismir.net
 To: luclebla...@videotron.ca
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org; eu-am...@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LEO/cube sat for sale 8000$
 
 Luc Leblanc wrote:
 
  As they said TubeSats are designed to be orbit-friendly.  Launches
  are expected to begin in December of 2010. Probably the replacing 
  solution for our aging AMSAT-NA satellite fleet? Anyone with 8000$
  can own his own satellite let me guess in a couple of years the same
   repeater frenzy will also reach the amateur satellite world. No more
  need of club or organization or IARU frequencies coordination . The
  perfect world...
 
 You missed the sentence before that one:
 
 After operating for a few months (the exact length of time on orbit is 
 dependent on solar activity), they will safely re-enter the atmosphere 
 and burn-up.
 
 Not a very good platform for an amateur radio satellite. Unless you want 
 to burn $32K/year/satellite. Also questionable since the tubesat is a 
 smaller package then a single cubesat.
 
 
 -- 
 Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
 bbj at innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for mailing lists

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones

This is almost farcical.  Unable to launch effective satellites and more or 
less flailing as an organization the board has now turned to a acceptable use 
policy which is so broad as to be useless...it boils down to things we like 
are good and things we dont like are bad.

entertaining

Robert WB5MZO  (All posts should include the author's first name and call sign, 
or full name if not currently licensed.)  I will add Life member



 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:11:41 -0500
 From: rwmcgw...@gmail.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT adopts Acceptable Use Policy for mailing lists
 
 This is welcome and it took entirely too long.  Its effectiveness will 
 entirely be determined by enforcement: swift and sure.
 
 
 73's
 Bob
 N4HY
 

  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: It's NOT Censorship

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones

Clint.  I dont agree with much of that. 

I agree that the 1st amendment only applies to government at all levels 
(through the 14th)...but moderating the discussion to delete such things as 
death threats or whatever is far different then moderating it to put a 
particular group or sub group in a better light.  I dont see any evidence of 
that yet, but the guidelines are so broad as to be meaningless.

This is what I really disagree with.


 
 This messagegroup - and millions of others - is a private party. NOT 
 government-run nor sponsored. We're mere visitors entering and using it, and 
 we have to abide by its rules - else we go elsewhere. Like guests in your 
 home, there's an expected set of rules for behavior, and AMSAT just laid them 
 out in black and white.
 

 Clint Bradford, K6LCS
 http://www.k6lcs.com

not really. AMSAT is a private group, but a group of members.  If you are a 
member of AMSAT in my view short of threatening death or shouting fire when 
there is no fire...you pretty much get to lay ones two cents on the line.

The AMSAT BOD is more or less acting, in my view, like our politicians in 
Washington ie once they are elected they are to busy to listen to the people 
who make up the group.

Robert WB5MZO Life member
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: It's NOT Censorship

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones

I find the entire thing rather silly.  If the organization were flying 
satellites and functioning well that might be something but as it is...it is 
sort of like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAeqVGP-GPMfeature=related

Gentleman you can't fight in here, This is the war room

courtesy Dr. Strangelove

Robert WB5MZO life member

CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
From: clintbra...@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: It's NOT Censorship
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:57:22 -0800
To: orbit...@hotmail.com



 ... but the guidelines are so broad as to be meaningless ...
I see the guidelines as a verbose version of:
Be a responsible citizen of the planet.
Clint 
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: It's NOT Censorship

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones


 
 When you are using the private resources of the AMSAT corporation, they can 
 do whatever they like.
 

 
 
 -Steve
 
 N1JFU -  http://n1jfu.blogspot.com - sme...@twitter


that probably holds true (I am not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV but I have 
been associated in a governing capacity with Amsat like organizations, much 
larger ones in fact)  as long as one is not a member.  If you are a member 
however, not so much.

Robert WB5MZO life member
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 25

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones

Yo Clint

bad comparison.  Your house, my house(s) (grin), (insert names) house is 
private property with an expectation both in common law, law, and ethics of 
privacy.

It is no where near the same as a public board which would not exist without 
the funds of members who pay dues.  If the AMSAT board members were doing all 
the financial lifting for the board with no dues used then there might be some 
better comparison...but ...

sorry the comparison is not even close.  In fact it is frankly very 
poor...about the worst one can have.

nice try.  I would have to give you a D minus

Robert WB5MZO life member

 From: clintbra...@earthlink.net
 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:06:01 -0800
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 5, Issue 25
 
  ... If you are a member of AMSAT in my view short of threatening death or 
  shouting fire when there is no fire...you pretty much get to lay ones two 
  cents on the line ...
 
 Yo, Robert - I'm coming over to your house this weekend. No, you didn't 
 invite me, but I'll show up anyway. I am bringing my sick St. Bernard - he 
 might mess up the carpet a little until he gets well. I might stay a week or 
 so, I dunno. I kinda like that artwork on your mantle - I think I'll take it 
 home with me when I leave. Sorry about the spilled Pina Colada stain on the 
 rug - I get excited while watching San Diego Chargers football. And I knocked 
 a hole in the wall of that back bedroom - to feed some cabling through for 
 the portable tower I brought with me. The smoke damage from that little fire 
 I accidentally started in the kitchen won't cost you too much in repairs - 
 and the awful smell will go away in a year or so, no biggie. Hey - the fridge 
 is now empty - great Omaha steaks, by the way ... and I used up all your 
 charcoal ...
 
 No, Robert, you would not welcome my presence in your house. You would ban me 
 for life. You'd change the locks and have a restraining order issued.
 
 A private club's (i.e., one not sponsored by the government)  membership 
 message board can be set up in any way its officials decide. Those that are 
 not allowed in have no legal recourse. Heck, there was a post today right 
 here that - if *I* were moderating the system - would never have been seen by 
 anyone else.
 
 And so it goes 
 
 Clint Bradford, K6LCS
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Board

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones

Clint...being on a listening tour and doing the will of the people are two 
different items.  

I have no doubt that any elected representative you have takes your calls, 
emails...etc...that is different from responding to them by actually voting 
that way.

Amsat is an organization that has produced very little of value in terms of 
working satellites in a long time

Robert WB5MZO  life member

 From: clintbra...@earthlink.net
 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:16:18 -0800
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Board
 
  ... The AMSAT BOD is more or less acting, in my view, like our politicians 
  in Washington ie once they are elected they are to busy to listen to the 
  people who make up the group ...
 
 Your membership experience in AMSAT - and in our democracy - is way different 
 than mine.
 
 I send an email on an issue to an AMSAT board member, and I receive a written 
 reply in a reasonable amount of time. EVERY time.
 
 I pick up the telephone and get right through to the legislative aide I know 
 at my US Senator's office - 45 hours a week, any time.
 
 For local issues, I can speak with either of two assistants to my county 
 supervisor during the week. I have the home phone number of one of them.
 
 These entities are not too busy to listen to me. 
 
 Developing effective communication skills may be a key in how effective one's 
 message is. And if that message contains what the AMSAT BOD has identified as 
 objectionable ( ... Illegal ...  Insulting, abusive, harassing, or 
 threatening ... Knowingly false or misrepresentative ...  ) then that 
 messenger needs to clean up his/her act.
 
 
 
 Clint Bradfiord, K6LCS
 AMSAT area coordinator, AMSAT benefactor
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: It's NOT Censorship

2010-01-15 Thread Rocky Jones

lol

Robert WB5MZO life member

 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:55:09 -0900
 To: kg4...@gmail.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 From: kl...@acsalaska.net
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: It's NOT Censorship
 
 At 02:09 PM 1/15/2010, David - KG4ZLB wrote:
 It's not altogether surprising that this topic is being discussed but
 really folks, lets look at the facts!
 
 The whole issue revolves around just a few members/posters who
 continually try and push the boundaries on what is a large list with
 respected and influential members all over the World.
 
 We all know who they are; the ones that immediately post a facetious
 reply to a newbie question, the ones that post one line,or worse still,
 one word answers that are ambiguous at best and downright rude at worst;
 the ones that take childish delight in trying to elicit the maximum
 controversy with seemingly innocuous postings. We know who they are and
 they know who they are and the laws of defamation restrict me in naming
 them!
 
 There is a delete key on your keyboard; there are message filters built
 in to your e-mail client and if you really get offended then there is
 always the un-subscribe route.
 
 But if anyone on the list ever gets to having to be warned by AMSAT
 about their conduct on the BB or worse still, be faced with
 suspension/expulsion from the list then shame on you!
 
 For the most part we are all responsible adults involved in a fairly
 expensive hobby (note hobby) that is both highly technical and to most
 people, quite complicated. If anyone feels that they can do a better job
 than anyone on the current Board then by all means file a motion of no
 confidence and see how many fully paid up members back you.
 
 Put up or shut up.
 
 That we have even had to come to an Acceptable Use Policy for this board
 should make certain members/posters question whether they should even be
 members.
 
 Rant over
 
 David
 KG4ZLB
 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 My Delete key is overheating...tell you anything?  Those that do not 
 cause rules have nothing to worry about.  Those that the rules were 
 made for ...wellI have a delete key ;-)
 I am way too busy in my hobby to bother with lurkers or 
 naysayers.  For a clue look at my website.  Genuine , respectful 
 debate will not be censored.
 
 
 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
 ==
   BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
 500-KHz/CW, 144-MHz EME, 1296-MHz EME
 DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
 == 
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded

2010-01-08 Thread Rocky Jones

Peter.  this has to have been a win win situation for everyone.  It essentially 
puts the final nail in the coffin of sea launch, the US has no real competition 
to the equatorial launch site...(OK Kwaj but thats still sometime in the 
future) and positions that side of the pond with a rocket that can at least 
take on SpaceX should (and when in my view) the Falcon9 and Falcon9 heavy make 
it into orbit.  Musk has Kwaj (or Australia perhaps I know he is looking down 
there) but the only way The Europeans and Russians start losing commercial 
payloads back to this side of the pond is if Musk is a success.

Otherwise not a chance that Delta and Atlas will compete with the systems at 
Kourou...

pretty shrewd move  Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:00:28 +0100
 From: peter.guel...@kourou.de
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Galileo Contract Awarded
 
 The answer is very simple:  There will be - no Soyuz test launches -
 from Kourou
 It's a proofed and robust rocket. There are already commercial customers
 booked for the first flight..
 Otherwise P3-E would be on it..   ;-)
 
 73s Peter DB2OS
 
 
 
 
 On 08.01.2010 17:51, Bill Ress wrote:
  Aaah - good point and worth exploring. Now all we need are some 
  contacts. Anyone have any suggestions?
 
  Regards...Bill - N6GHz
 
  Trevor . wrote:

  --- On Fri, 8/1/10, Bill Ress b...@hsmicrowave.com wrote:
  
  I would guess with the controversy regarding our 1296 MHz
  band operations and Galileo, we wouldn't be in good standing
  with the Galileo folks so looking for ride share
  opportunities would be out of the question???

  I'm presuming the launches will be from the Russian launch site at Kourou 
  ? 
 
  Given it's a new site and the Russian haven't launched from a tropical 
  climate before I'd imagine there'd be some test launches first. 
 
  73 Trevor M5AKA
 
 
  
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Winter Project

2010-01-07 Thread Rocky Jones

my project along your lines came from the third edition of the ARRL VHF 
handbook...page 102 it is an 829B amp for 144mhz.  I've built a couple of them 
over the years...and they all played pretty easy just following the 
instructions in the article.  There are some other 'easy amps the 6360 was a 
little hard to make play (it was my first OSCAR amp) but a good learning 
experience.  I can (it will take a few days) scan some of this in and ship it 
to you if you would find that helpful.  Power supplies are a little tricky.  
Fair has some transformers but they are ouch...I prowl garage sales and find 
OLD really old tv's that have tubes in them and are toast.  the transformer is 
usually OK.  

The other day I had the Drake ML-2 and the 829 up (with a 40673 preamp) up as 
the space station roared over...it was kind of fun with the kids to have a back 
and forth with it as it flew over all with gear that is a few decades old...

anyway let me know if the copies would help  Robert WB5MZO

 From: dano...@email.itt-tech.edu
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:56:29 +
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Winter Project
 
 
 I'm looking for a winter project can any one point me in the direction of a 2 
 meter tube amp nothing crazy about 25-50 out, 1-10 in. I have never used or 
 played with a tube circuit so i thougt winter why not. Thanks 73
 
 Thank You
 Douglas Anoman
 KC9MLN
 kc9...@amsat.org
 Amsat #37043
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Happy New Year

2009-12-31 Thread Rocky Jones

in 2010  DE WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] another bleep sat

2009-12-29 Thread Rocky Jones

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=29916  
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Battery Charger Deal - TODAY ONLY

2009-12-04 Thread Rocky Jones

thanks  Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:20:59 -0800
 From: clintbra...@earthlink.net
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Battery Charger Deal - TODAY ONLY
 
 Today only, Amazon has the La Crosse BC-9009 AlphaPower Battery Charger for 
 $34.99 shipped. And in addition to NiCD/NiMH charger, you get four AA 
 rechargeables, four AAA's, adapters for C and D cells, and a travel case.
 
 Charger features four independent status displays, one for each of its four 
 slots. They can cycle through stats like charge rate, discharge rate, elapsed 
 time, and total battery capacity.
 
 http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00077AA5Q
 
 Clint, K6LCS
 
 
 
 
 --
 Clint Bradford, K6LCS
 http://www.clintbradford.com
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Chat with Messenger straight from your Hotmail inbox.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/hotmail_bl1/hotmail_bl1.aspx?ocid=PID23879::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-ww:WM_IMHM_4:092009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Frustration Solved!

2009-11-30 Thread Rocky Jones


 Just
 yesterday I spent a half hour wondering why my printer didn't print.  When
 you remove the wrong ethernet cable earlier in the day and assumed it was
 the correct one for another device...well, you know the rest of the story. 
 
 73
 Greg
 N3MVF  
 


Ah the old It was unplugged problema pleasant combination of Murphy and 
random chance...

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun Dual Band Chine in AO-51

2009-11-27 Thread Rocky Jones

Nice 

Robert WB5MZO

 From: ce3...@gmail.com
 To: AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
 Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:29:46 -0300
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Wouxun Dual Band Chine in AO-51
 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhMda5btD6w
 
 my Setup is Rx Wouxun Chine Radio Dual Band Great Rx
 in Tx Motorola GP-300 + 5/8 Telescopic Antenna 
 
 Tnk look Video
 
 Raúl
 CA3SOC
 
 
 
 -
 Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
 There is a solution!
 
 Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
 The most powerful anti-spam software available.
 http://mail.spaminspector.com
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Windows 7: I wanted simpler, now it's simpler. I'm a rock star.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?h=myidea?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_myidea:112009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT NextGen Program Progress

2009-11-11 Thread Rocky Jones

Alex and Joanne...thanks for the correction...sorry I misread

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:22:02 -0500
 From: am...@elkmtn.org
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT NextGen Program Progress
 
   So Arisssat or suitsat 2 whatever it is called is now going to be 
 ready at the end of 2010?
 
 
  Robert WB5MZO
 
 I said that we would be in a good position to have a NextGen 2U or 3U 
 CubeSat satellite ready for a launch opportunity anytime after late 2010.
 It's up to the AMSAT BoD to
 (a) decide to launch any NextGen satellite
 (b) raise the money to launch a NextGen satellite
 
 I don't remember saying anything about ARISSat-1's launch opportunities, 
 I'm not the ARISSat Program Manager.
 
 Alex, N3NP
 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurantsform=MFESRPpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MFESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] no amateur radio payload but this is going to be

2009-11-10 Thread Rocky Jones

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0911/10solarsails/

neat visually...wonder if the telemetry is in the ham bands?

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9690331ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen:112009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ultimatecharger website

2009-11-09 Thread Rocky Jones


http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200205/msg00661.html

it seems to be gone

Robert WB5MZO


 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:01:15 -0800
 From: k1...@yahoo.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  ultimatecharger website
 
 Does W0LMD still maintain the ultimatecharger website, or has it been 
 changed? I have been on this website in the past, but I can no longer bring 
 it up. 
 Thanks,
 Pete, K1HZU
 
 
 
   
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] New Russian module for space station

2009-11-03 Thread Rocky Jones

http://www.onorbit.com/node/1460

Nice story on the Russians preparing their next module..

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9690331ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen:112009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: using a microsat as a potential high altitude VHF reflector

2009-10-28 Thread Rocky Jones

There are two neat concepts from the early days of communications experiments 
using satellites and Echo is one of them (the other is SCORE).

There were a lot of ideas for follow on echos...one used a gravity gradient 
pole to stop the balloon from spinning and keeping it pointed to the earth, 
allowing a directional reflector to be installed in the balloon...another used 
a radar reflector like concept inside the balloon to increase the amount of DB 
that returned...

The problems were large however.  Doppler shift and tracking were issues at 
the time (and probably still are)..the antennas were going to have to be large 
(really large).

My elmer in Dallas when he was in the USAF did some radar experiments with 
echo...I got to see it a few times.

SCORE probably has more relevance to todays possibilities.  

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/pc-scout/default.aspx?CBID=wlocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_pcscout:102009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: using a microsat as a potential high altitude VHF reflector

2009-10-28 Thread Rocky Jones


Drew.  I had forgotten about West Ford...but they are all gone.  While in grad 
school we tried some reflection test using the then prototype of the SPS 48E 
and there was nothing...

Robert WB5MZO
 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:12:54 -0400
 From: glasbren...@mindspring.com
 To: samudra.ha...@gmail.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: using a microsat as a potential high altitude VHF 
 reflector
 
 
 
  were there any ham radio projects (either through amsat-na or abroad)
  that implemented a passive reflector on an orbital vehicle like
  Project Echo
 

 Not long ago I saw some webpages and emails about some hams using ISS 
 (or was it Mir?) as a passive reflector.
 
 Coincidently, I was reading about the West Ford project, which was 
 launches of millions of small wire dipoles to be used as reflectors. 
 Some of those clusters are still in orbit. I wonder if they are still in 
 a dense enough field to reflect the 8 Ghz? signal they were designed for.
 
 73, Drew KO4MA
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Windows 7: Simplify your PC. Learn more.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen1:102009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Ares

2009-10-27 Thread Rocky Jones

It is kind of funny.  more will be spent on this launch (for 2 minutes of 
flight give or take) then Elon Musk has spent so far on his entire effort to 
develop Falcon 9 and he is going to try and go to orbit late November (give or 
take).

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:00:54 -0400
 From: kg4...@googlemail.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Ares
 
 Not yet it hasn't!
 
 Weather problems.
 
 
 
 rwmcgw...@gmail.com wrote:
  Launch at 9:49 am edt
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 

 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Windows 7: It helps you do more. Explore Windows 7.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen3:102009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Ares will try again

2009-10-27 Thread Rocky Jones

WX did them in...

Robert WB5MZO

  
_
Windows 7: It helps you do more. Explore Windows 7.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen3:102009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: antenna question

2009-10-22 Thread Rocky Jones


This is a great paper and solid work.  It doesnt have a chance of being 
implemented on an amateur radio budget or time scale to the point where a solid 
reliable platform can be flown.

What the satellite group needs is more Oscar 7's (or VO 52's) and Oscar 
10...Arsene and Oscar IV were not bad concepts.  Face it, we are not going to 
make working the world on an HT a viable proposition.

Robert WB5MZO
 From: samudra.ha...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:25 -0400
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: antenna question
 
 While searching for public text concerning Amateur satellites and
 phased array antennas, I came across this gem from our very own Tom
 Clark, K3IO
 http://mysite.verizon.net/w3iwi/electronic_scanning_antennas.pdf,
 Electronic Scanning Antennas for Amateur Spacecraft. I wonder if
 this knowhow could be utilized for ground stations to have antennas
 that could rapidly switch between different birds by a software reload
 function and a intelligent switching matrix ?
 
  
_
Windows 7: It helps you do more. Explore Windows 7.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen3:102009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] the future is coming

2009-10-21 Thread Rocky Jones

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/SpaceX_Completes_First_Stage_9_Engine_Rocket_Firing_999.html

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-20 Thread Rocky Jones

Dan.

 
 But Amsat-BB is not read only by Amsat members. Anyone who Google's Amsat
 will find Amsat-BB very quickly. Negative and unprofessional comments on
 Amsat-BB hurt our image as professional satellite builders and could quite
 possibly kill our chance of finding our next ride to orbit. In the 1990's the
 ESA management handed the president of Amsat-DL a pile of e-mail printouts
 from Amsat-BB following the repeated launch delays on Phase 3D, it almost got
 the satellite thrown off the Ariane 5 vehicle. With launches even harder to
 find in today's world, we cannot allow such bickering to tarnish our image as
 professionals who can be trusted not to screw up the mission. 
 
 Dan Schultz N8FGV


so what?  We should never on the BB have differences with the direction that 
the satellite program is going?  YOu have to be kidding.

The only comments I and others have raised or made have been completely 
professional.  The folks building suitsat 2 did miss a deployment campaign, 
they just did.  It is a fair statement to ask if the project is to complicated. 
 It is fair to ask why for instance we are not using transponders that have 
flown on other satellites but are not built in Amsat NA or are not gee whiz 
gizmo stuff...

And fair questions deserve fair answers.  I am a life member of NA (as 
doubtless, all the keyboard commandos have figured out)  that should be enough 
to get fair and straight answers.

what have I gotten back? you are a  troll or the folks building the 
satellites are working 18 hours a day or even more silly responses (You might 
hurt their feelings) and then there is Frank B's statement which caused a hoot 
I mean just a hoot  at MOD.  It has been on a level that my 10 year rise above 
on their face book page.

The folks on the  board and their toady's act like they are Donald 
Rumsfeld...and we should have all had far enough of that manner.  AS for the 
folks who are building and managing the build of the satellite crop.  WOW if 
they stopped would we be worse off?  The launch campaigns have not been exactly 
inspiring.

Look the board is going to go its way...we will see how Suitsat 2 works out.  
If it doesnt then it wont matter NA will have just about used up all its mojo 
with the folks on NASA Rd 1.

As for the ESA thing on the BB...I dont have a clue how that played out.  My 
only tag up with those folks has been over a decade ago.  We mucked about with 
them for a bit on their microgravity airplane.(flying the Bus was fun)..and 
as a part of safety certification I got to go to FG to see how they do it and 
saw several launch campaigns.I found them completely professional and 
business like...and while I take the story as gospel the folks I knew in ESA 
would hardly be troubled by the comments on a BB which as you say can be joined 
up by anyone.  

Hope you are having a good morning.  

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-20 Thread Rocky Jones

Ken.  I concur the conversation is pointless.  how pointless can be seen in the 
childish level that folks like Frank B have dropped to.  It is typical internet 
flame...

Look the BOD is simply non responsive.  they are going to do it how they are 
going to do it...and they theory is to shut down any differing viewpoints.

See how suitsat 2 goes.  If it is a success then wow their theory is validated 
and I will be the first to congratulate them.  If not.  Pick up the 
conversation then

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:26:41 -0400
 From: n2...@mindspring.com
 To: bruni...@usna.edu; orbit...@hotmail.com; n8...@usa.net; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch
 
 Bob and Dan -
 
 I sympathize with what you're saying and know you both have AMSAT's best 
 interests at heart.  But unfortunately I don't see this exchange going in a 
 positive direction.  
 
 We all know this is not the first time somebody has come on this mailing list 
 lacking a constructive motive.  It appears that, with such a person, it is a 
 counter-productive to continue the exchange.  No matter what meaningful and 
 accurate comments you might make, it will get twisted or otherwise 
 re-interpreted in a negative fashion or in the light most favorable to an 
 ulterior agenda.  This is *my opinion* as an AMSAT member and thus *not* 
 something I will debate online, or in private for that matter.  Thus 
 understand in advance [Rocky] why I will ignore any non-constructive 
 responses to this message.
 
 I think we agree this list is a great thing for those wanting information, 
 having bona fide questions, or wishing to offer a constructive opinion.  I 
 will be happy to exchange messages with anybody who (in my opinion) is 
 engaging in something positive or constructive.  
 
 I would, however, recommend that those of us who have AMSAT's best interest 
 at heart try something different to deal with negativism.   My suggestion is 
 to attempt once (and only once) to steer things in a positive or constructive 
 direction.  If that fails, simply state that you are not obligated to 
 exchange messages with anybody you believe is not pursing a positive or 
 constructive agenda.  Make it incumbent on the person making the 
 objectionable comments to put things back in a positive direction if they 
 wish to get any replies.
 
 If everybody who has AMSAT's best interests at heart followed that, I think 
 we'd have much better exchanges on this list.  Just a thought...
 
 73, Ken N2WWD
  
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Bruninga bruni...@usna.edu
 Sent: Oct 20, 2009 12:22 PM
 To: 'Rocky Jones' orbit...@hotmail.com, n8...@usa.net, 'Amsat BB' 
 amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch
 
  so what?  We should never on the BB have 
  differences with the direction that the 
  satellite program is going?  YOu have to 
  be kidding.
 
 No we are not..
 
 You clearly do not understand volunteerism in a highly techincal
 endeavor where Those that can... DO and Those that can't
 should contribute or GET OUT OF THE WAY.
 
  The only comments I and others have raised 
  or made have been completely professional.
 
 No, just incessant whining and no productive contribution.
 Either BUILD something, or contribute to those that are, or shut
 up and get out of the way.. (my personal opinion since I have NO
 position within AMSAT other than as a contributor where I can).
 
  And fair questions deserve fair answers. 
 
 Yes, do some work instead of driviling... go develop some
 answers, and stop acting like a troll just wasting everyone's
 time.
 
  what have I gotten back? 
  you are a  troll 
 
 Yes, all of your posts seem to meet that definition perfectly...
 
  Hope you are having a good morning.  
 
 I will when I can stop having to read your drivel every
 morning...
 
 Bob
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] more information on the Iranian

2009-10-20 Thread Rocky Jones

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0910/18iran/

bird and launcher...

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones

Dan

Why would they fly ballast on their rocket when they could have flown a ham
satellite?...

I didnt ask why.

Your list sounds a lot like my 10 year olds explaining why something didnt get 
done when they know that they should have done it.  Their first inclination 
(and that is a hallmark of childhood) is to try and blame someone or something 
elses.  .

Nothing in life is easy except inertia.  

Robert WB5MZO


  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones

Dan

4. Ballast does not have an e-mail group full of whining little people who
think they could have designed it better or that it operates on the wrong band
or mode, and complaining loudly when the mission falls months or years behind
its original launch date. 




this is the one I always find amusing.  Almost comical and certainly childish.

Are the people who are suppose to be the experts in building state of the art 
satellites so thin skinned that a bulletin board
slows their progress?  LOL

If so then I suggest that they channel The Former First lady Nancy Reagan and 
Just say no  either stop building satellites and move on to something that 
wont be at all critical...or just tune out and stop reading.

It is the childhood equivalent of he called me a name

LOL

things are hard

Robert WB5MZO




  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones

Bob...

LOL really it is funny.

If one person can knock them off their stride then the deserve to bilge...

I guess that any explanation for poor performance works



Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones


 
 Samudra, N3RDX and S21X

interesting post...there are lots of volunteer organizations and all of them 
managed to do things without the endless whining of they are all 
volunteers...gee if that could lift things into orbit  

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Mesbah-2

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones

Peter...as I said, someone is building a cubesat.

or something slightly bigger.

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:29:44 +0200
 From: peter.guel...@kourou.de
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Mesbah-2
 
 http://www.astronautix.com/craft/mesbah2.htm
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: THE DMSP launch

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones

Bob

It is OK, maybe suitsat 2 or whatever it is called with be a success or at 
least occur..if it flops then all the folks who are always gung ho to make 
excuses can have something else to do!  Work is also needed for those 
protecting inertia

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: MIR sound clip

2009-10-19 Thread Rocky Jones



Bill..well done...nice tower shots as well

Robert WB5MZO
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 From: mrbill...@mac.com
 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:55:21 -0500
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  MIR sound clip
 
 Here's a MIR clip I recorder years ago, using a cassette recorder  
 with vox, hooked to a Radio Shack scanner.
 The file is named 8-25-99, but I'm not sure when the recording happened.
 
 http://web.mac.com/mrbillmac/Site/MIR_sound_file.html
 
 The file plays okay from the web page, on a Mac... haven't tried it  
 on a PC yet.
 
 Bill Howell
 N5AB
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Why do hamsats? (Or anything else...)

2009-10-18 Thread Rocky Jones



 
 There are all sorts of reasons why flying digital transponders is a
 good idea.  Your cell phone (presuming you have one) 
 
 73 Mark K6HX
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Mark...yeap we have cellphones here in Clear Lake Texas...you know we can send 
email, pictures, do GPS tracking wow isnt it amazing.  And over in Iraq 
cellphones (grin) would allow the Predators to send pictures where the bad 
people are so they can be negated...isnt ones and zeros great.  Next time you 
fly on a commercial airliner you should ask the drivers to let you look up 
front...lots of digital stuff there.  Dazzle the crew and ask them to point out 
the Flight management systems for you!

That still doesnt answer the question of why on Suitsat 2 they should fly a 
digital transponder.

In my view better engineering doctrine would imply that we try and put the 
digital transponder ON ISS and let it cook there for a bit.  

Think about that for a minute.  

OK why would that be a good idea?  Because the setup should be easier, if 
something goes wrong with the setup then the back room (SPAN) at JSC should 
be able to send up words which can fix the issue...then any problems with the 
Transponder as it is used could be resolved...and if the entire thing goes 
tango uniform then it could be brought back to earth (down mass is easy) and 
looked at.

As it is, with the knowledge that suitsat 1 died on deployment...we would never 
know if the transponder was just not working or wasnt put together well.

It is completely possible that AMSAT NA is so screwed in its technical ability 
that it might not be possible to get NASA to let that happen...but that would 
be a far better use of the transponder then tossing it out into space and 
seeing what happens.

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: According to Rocky Jones

2009-10-18 Thread Rocky Jones



 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:44:57 +
 From: ni...@ngunn.net
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: According to Rocky Jones
 
 I guesswe need to get you on the design/construction team to show the 
 experts how to do it.
 


the experts were very successful with Suitsat 1.  Eagle worked out good as well 
didnt it?

Suitsat 2...dellivered on time ...oh well not so much.  ARISSsat or whatever it 
is...fourth time is a charm

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] THE DMSP launch

2009-10-18 Thread Rocky Jones

We have a unique opportunity with the Atlas 5/DMSP launch, as DMSP is
a relatively lighter spacecraft than many of those that fly on Atlas.
For that reason, we have a tremendous amount of performance margin.
That's certainly not the case for some future missions that Atlas will
be flying. So we're taking advantage of the opportunity before us to
use some of that excess performance margin on the Atlas 5, said Col.
Michael Moran, the Atlas Group commander.

to bad we didnt have something to use that excess performance...they flew 
ballast on the flight

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Why do hamsats? (Or anything else...)

2009-10-18 Thread Rocky Jones



 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:57:34 -0400
 From: b...@innismir.net
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com


I wrote:
 
  In my view better engineering doctrine would imply that we try and
  put the digital transponder ON ISS and let it cook there for a bit.
 

you replied
 Yup, that would be ideal, I'm nominating you to head that project. This
 is right up your alley, as since you and your friends within the JSC
 can navigate the political process easily. Lets run this in tandem with
 the ARISSSat project.
 
 Thanks for volunteering!
 
 -- 
 Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
 bbj at innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/

one has to wonder Ben why didnt they try it?  There would have been a few more 
issues involved in terms of operating the thing on ISS other then just 
deploying it (mostly RF work)...

but...

as for me heading the project.  I'd deep six the entire software defined 
transponder, put it on a development effort with some heavy program 
guidance...find some people who wanted to build linear transponders even if 
they were overseas (such people exist already) and start flying as many of 
those as possible.

Right now what in my view the satellite community needs is a 100 percent Oscar 
7 or 10...not some technological development issues.

If I were king we would have something to offer the USAF if they had spare lift 
on a Centaur as they just had...remember the original Oscar's flew on USAF 
vehicles.

in the meantime I will continue to keep my technical skills sharp (grin) by 
helping the 10 year olds put together a buoy that is going to float in Clear 
Lake...

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] someone is launching cubesats!

2009-10-18 Thread Rocky Jones


http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0910/18iran/

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Why do hamsats? (Or anything else...)

2009-10-17 Thread Rocky Jones

great input...work real hard on those thoughts?  Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Can we get them to fix AO-40 first then?

2009-10-17 Thread Rocky Jones



  successful. 
 
 On a more practical note, could there be some sort of failsafe battery
 went phut so disconnect it device?  I'm guessing a perfectly ordinary
 inline fuse would be too simple, but perhaps some sort of mechanical
 latch that would just pop the battery terminal if it lost power would
 work.
 
 Gordon MM0YEQ
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

that is fairly common in many spacecraft (I have checked a few designs) and 
most transport category airplanes.  I dont have a clue why it wasnt put into 
AO-40

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Why do hamsats? (Or anything else...)

2009-10-17 Thread Rocky Jones

Diane.  I concur in you're comments particularly that failure is not alone an 
indicator of incompetence.  (my words but hopefully it is fair to you're 
thought)

What in engineering (and in life) signals incompetence is moving outside of 
established engineering design parameters.  Hence if one has  a specification 
that no foam comes off the tank and yet foam comes off the tank on every 
flight...then dont be surprised when a big one comes off and ruins your vehicle.

( a modest summation of the Columbia accident investigation board).

It is in my view not competent engineering to fly a payload, where the first 
one failed and it was several orders of magnitude less complex then what one is 
trying to fly now...and one has really no idea of why it failed.  

How is the later important?

A prudent guess (and that is all it is) is that Suitsat 1 failed because 
someone on the space station put the darn thing together wrong.  or the 
assembly instructions were wrong or...

If it worked on the ground and in the various test chambers then that is one 
prudent method of investigation (AMSAT may know this already and just cannot 
say it out loud because the mythic heroes on orbit never make mistakes!)   But 
before launching a far more complicated payload one might want to find that out 
(the satellite might help them here if there is not a lot of assembly to do on 
the station).

But a software derived transponder is not simple and if the thing fails...most 
likely no one will know why.  Was it some astronaut missed one of those 
switches or is the entire program screwed?  What to do with cubesat then?

AMSAT's role should be as far as possible to keep the membership supplied with 
functioning satellites.  It is not the ham equivelent of DARPA or whatever.  If 
the role is not to keep hamsats in orbit, then what does it do

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: On the possibility of imaging AO-40

2009-10-17 Thread Rocky Jones



 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:20:24 -0700
 To: apbid...@mailaps.org
 From: anto...@qualcomm.com
 CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org; k...@arrl.net; n...@bellsouth.net
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: On the possibility of imaging AO-40
 
 At 04:56 AM 10/16/2009, Alan P. Biddle wrote:
 Getting an image is clearly possible, but only if you can get a certain
 agency known by its initials to do it.
 
 I offer a different opinion.  We know how large the primary mirror 
 (optical aperture) of these spy satellites are, because we know how 
 big the launch vehicles are, and the satellites had to fit into the 
 launch vehicles.  Therefore, I believe they are no larger than 
 Hubble.  Therefore, I figure the spook agencies can't actually help us.


I think that you are correct..when Hubble was carried to Cape Kennedy AVLeak 
reported that it arrived in the same carrier as the KH's used.  There are 
differences between the two I think, but the mirror is about the same (in my 
opinion)

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: The Beef Frank is in the east

2009-10-16 Thread Rocky Jones


 
Tim Lilley - N3TL
Athens, Ga. - EM84ha


 
After seeing Mr. Bauer's post to the AMSAT-BB the other day, I
correctly deduced that the silly and humorless title of this email was
your attempt at being cute and clever in response.

obviously no one is going to slip something past you

When you drive into Hotlanta, have a Vasity Chili Cheese dog...(a dog 
walkin...as I recall)...good for the heart (not so much but it is nice to 
dream).

Great town Athens.  

73  Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Why do hamsats?

2009-10-16 Thread Rocky Jones

Bruce.  I changed the title.  I didnt like Frank doing what he did in public 
and as far as I am concern the exchange is over.

I got three points from you're piece...and they are good ones.

First..the educational benefits of suitsat 1 and 2.

I have no doubt thanks to folks like you (and others) there was educational 
value (and perhaps inspirational value) from the suitsat experience.  No doubt.

The other day when LCROSS was suppose to do the plume thing we had about 15 
kids over (early in the morning) to watch it through the 12 and 4.5 inch 
tube.  Santa Fe TX is a semi rural area with large farms...and the kids are 
use to getting up early, but a bunch of neighborhood kids came over with the 
invite of the 10 year olds...and we had eggs for breakfast and models and some 
computer tracking programs running...and even though there was nothing to be 
seen (turns out by almost anything!) there was a great deal of fun, some good 
education opportunity and all that.

Problem is that the big question (the 80 million dollar question) still 
remains...1) did the mission do what it was suppose to do and 2) was it the 
best use of 80 million dollars to answer that question (as well as the unique 
opportunity the launch provided).  Those are answers that do not get 
ameliorated by the educational value of what occurred.

Education is a good thing, but but unless it is the primary goal of whatever 
was being done then the primary thing has to have value commensurate with cost  
all on its own.  

Ham radio is about communicating.  If we want to turn its primary task into 
education then it will look very very different.

Second the odds of success.  I had let the topic drop until it was brought up 
by someone else.  It is to me depressing.  AMSAT NA in particular seems to be 
(at least in my view) on a high technology kamikaze mission.  The reason Oscars 
I through 13 were quite successful is that they each (might have had problems) 
built on the success and knowledge of the last one.They were robust, single 
focused (ie they were transponders and limited at that).  Todays efforts are 
one gadget after another in my view.   Hence the sat population is decreasing.

Suitsat 1 failed technologically (grin) even though it was a very simple 
satellite.  Prudent engineering doctrine would say try it or something 
slightly more complicated again and get it correct before moving on to 
something vastly more complicated.  Instead it is we cannot get people to work 
on it if it is not something cool.  as if getting a vehicle into space that 
works shouldnt all on its own be something ...

The folks who are in charge have chosen this path...see how it works.

Third...I have no problem with them taking the opportunity  

Many years ago we brought the airplane that is today the preeminent two engine 
heavy into the old Denver Stapleton airport so the launch customer could show 
it off.   (it was pretty cool actually, even though the concrete could handle 
the light weight of the big twin, the asphalt covering couldnt and boards had 
to be put down to keep the trucks from sinking).  The launch customer (UAL) 
brought out a Boeing 247 for comparison.

One of the first things that they did was open the airplane(s) up for school 
kids.  They had pilots and flight attendants in current and period 
outfits...the educational value was pretty splendid.

But it meant nothing if the Big Twin couldnt keep the wings on it (the problem 
with its sister) 

Robert WB5MZO

PS...as for being sarcastic...I confess the end got the better of me.  it 
detracted from my point!  




  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: DMSP F18's launch vehicle far exceeds mission requirements

2009-10-16 Thread Rocky Jones



 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:54:47 -0700
 From: k...@philkarn.net
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] DMSP F18's launch vehicle far exceeds mission 
 requirements
 
 Seems like a missed opportunity for a secondary payload. Sigh.

Yeap there were two oppurtunities.  45 pounds of ballast on the secondary slot 
of the Centaur...and the Centaur itself.

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Why do hamsats? (Or anything else...)

2009-10-16 Thread Rocky Jones

Mark

the two points you raise are interesting

Education...you wrote in part 

.
 
 It does list intercommunication, but it also lists self-training
 and technical investigations, which certainly have a clear
 educational mandate.  

you can interpret that anyway you want to...but I dont see a mandate there to 
do general education...but even if there was one...

it is bogus to say this project failed in its main goal but was a success 
because it did education.  Put another way...the recent crash on the Moon and 
find water.

Would you really buy that the 80 million dollars spent was well spent if the 
effort did not answer the basic scientific questions it was designed to do (and 
we dont know if it did or did not but it probably didnt)...if it did good 
education (my words). 

I dont. 

If the 80 million was going to do education, it should have been spent on 
that...and there are ways to do it.  If something has a primary goal and that 
primary goal improves education then thats great...but when the primary goal 
fails...it is a stretch of massive proportions to say well it was a success 
because it educated people.

I dont know how the education thing got into ham radio, but I imagine it is 
one of the virus that we got when we started interfacing with NASA for ham 
radio.  There is no justification for human spaceflight (and I am not the only 
one that thinks that...the Augustine Commission agrees there is not) so NASA 
and its groupies try everything to justify it including education. 





 Yes, we could kick a very
 basic linear transponder out of the ISS, and it would float around in
 LEO and allow you to make some contacts, but so what?  What purpose
 would be served?   

A great deal.  It would allow communications and experimentation and self 
teaching in ham radio which is the essence of the hobby.

I'll turn it around.  What purpose is going to be served by another flop like 
Suitsat 1?  

I hope I am wrong about the failure rate but probably not.  We will 
see...Suitsat2 is definatly going the way it is.


Robert WB5MZO

  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Ares 1-X in highbay 3

2009-10-16 Thread Rocky Jones

see how it works...SpaceX is going to launch a Falcon9 into orbit this 
year...All Ares1x is going to go for is a couple of minutes!

Robert WB5MZO

 From: josepharmbrus...@gmail.com
 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:06:15 -0400
 To: AMSAT-BB@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Ares 1-X in highbay 3
 
 The subject of this email says it all.  This is too incredible not to  
 share with you all and an interesting look inside!
 
 http://nasatech.net/Ares1-Xmid091015/
 
 Enjoy,
 Joseph Armbruster
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Can we get them to fix AO-40 first then?

2009-10-15 Thread Rocky Jones

Peter.

In the current configuration (or the last known config) of the vehicle does the 
vehicle have sufficient solar illumination to spin and maintain the DC busses 
without a battery?

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] The Beef Frank is in the east

2009-10-15 Thread Rocky Jones

Pasture...along with the milking cows, a few goats, and yes the chickens and 
ducks.  The Longhorn is there more or less for show (no tribute to George Abbey 
BTW)

Sorry for the late reply Frank.  My wife and I are pregnant so we spent the 
afternoon looking around The CLEAR LAKE Texas  and Santa Fe area for hospitals 
that are on either of our health insurance plans.  Then we took the in laws to 
dinner at The Aquarium in KEMAH (the boardwalk at Kemah) (it is the mother in 
laws birthday), after which we had some pleasant conversation.

I stress our itinerary because it tells the group what you must already know 
(since you are in the keyboard commando mode) that I live in the area of 
Houston that the JSC calls home. Running the call sign would have told you 
that.The House is about 1.2 nm from the North gate of JSC just south on  
Space Center.   In normal times I jog the course there and back four times in 
the morning.   I've lived in  Clear Lake for quite a bit.  Still own the house 
there although after my latest DXpedition the housesitter wont be clear of it 
until Jan next year.  Fortunately we have the farm in Santa Fe.

Since I live in the area I  have quite a few 
friends/chums/associates/neighbors/etc who are current employees at NASA or the 
contractors.   They know I am interested in space policy, amateur radio (you 
should see the setup at the house in Clear Lake), and share things. That is one 
source of information and it is pretty good. It is good enough for the 
statement I made.   (I am amused that you ran me through the data base, but 
caution you that NASA watch pointed out how flawed that data base is...)

So after conversation with the family and before responding to the post you put 
out I fed it through the USC internet flame war program that is standard US 
government affair and found out that both you and Jeff Hanley managed a email 
that touched all the internet flame war points.  Two peas in a pod I guess

Frank, I dont respond kindly to emails where the person sending puts up a claim 
that I didnt make (know all that is going on within NASA) and then starts 
his own rant with a question based on that premise (  And how
 are you all knowing???).  And does it all in public not in a private email.  
 People on the board have asked me what I do privately and I've been pleased 
 to give them chapter line and verse.   This time I'll be kind and just chalk 
 it up to you having gone zero impedance to ground over how things are going.

I did find the 
 Or are you using another alias besides Robert Oler or Rocky Jones? amusing.  

It is the weakest of the internet flame tactics you use and the most amusing .  
It is also even more nonsensical then the rest of the post from you.  I have 
signed everything on this BB and as best I can tell on the internets (to 
quote our last President) with my full name or my name that has some identifier 
with it so it is not just a Robert.  That is where the call sign comes in 
handy.   With me posting my call sign if you are confused, well that is your 
fault, not mine.  The line you use is a little above when did you stop beating 
you're wife in logical validity.

Finally..

As for 80 percent of suitsat 2 failing...actually that is the consensus among 
a lot of folks at the center.  I give Suitsat 2 less then 10 percent chance 
of working.  That didnt take oh several decades of dealing with complex 
programs or a bunch of US government schools or a lot of engineering degrees to 
figure out.  It is really not rocket science...Suitsat 1 was a bomb and it 
was much simpler.  Now they are trying something more complicated...  I am not 
even sure it deploys.  If it flops well it is hard to see a lot of ham radio 
traction on the space station after that.

But Just think, if it works you can tell me I was wrong!  Wont that be fun?  

Are you upset because you have heard the same thing?  LOL

Find some manners, stop the internet flame postings and try and be a facts and 
data kind of guy in deeds no just words you will get farther. If you cant then 
I can get more aggressive!.   Have a great Thursday night.

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO

 From: ka3...@comcast.net
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:21:10 -0400
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  Where's the Beef?
 
 Robert,
 
 You commented:
 
 As for AMSAT's ARISSsat transponder.  Well we will see if it works.  They
 are not exactly burning up the track record with success.  We have had this
 argument and I am willing to sit back and see if it goes, but it is far to
 much project for the program.  Most of the folks I know at JSC give it less
 then 20 percent chance of working...In fact it was a source of mirth at a
 recent BDAY party.
 
 All your e-mails give the impression that you are well positioned within JSC
 and know all that is going on within NASA.  But when I did a Search for
 your name within the NASA employee and contractor database, the database
 comes up empty handed.  
 
 Given that I am

[amsat-bb] Re: Can we get them to fix AO-40 first then?

2009-10-15 Thread Rocky Jones

Hello Peter and thanks for the reply...sorry mine was so late, busy afternoon.

you answered my question.  I had heard that with the arrays folded or based 
on some failures...that AO-40 did not have 360 degree coverage in solar cells 
around its spin access.  

If that was the case then the battery was going to be essential for any type of 
recovery...but since it is not accurate then I agree if the battery will open 
(do a seven) then the only question would be the Solar angle.  

Thank you for a very good and straight forward answer  73

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:30:03 +0200
 From: peter.guel...@kourou.de
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com
 CC: samudra.ha...@gmail.com; amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Can we get them to fix AO-40 first then?
 
 Hi Robert,
 
 that's indeed the big question...   We do not know in which attitude the
 spacecraft is..  is it still spinning very slowly or tumbling?  What is
 the Solar-ß-Angel?
 If the S/C has a good orientation to the sun and the battery opens, than
 there should be enough power to operate the IHU and Beacon etc... do
 some magnetorquing to improve attitude.
 Something like this was done when AO-10 was hit by the last rocket
 stage, spinning the wrong direction with sun directly on top and almost
 no power...
 Unfolding the solar panels would give very high power only when they are
 oriented towards the sun.  With folded solar arrays, all panels around
 the satellite can still see the sun around it's spin axis.
 Only when it shines on top or bottom, we will have problems...
 
 73s Peter
 
 
 
 Rocky Jones wrote:
  Peter.
 
  In the current configuration (or the last known config) of the vehicle
  does the vehicle have sufficient solar illumination to spin and
  maintain the DC busses without a battery?
 
  Robert WB5MZO
 
  
  Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
  http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
 
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] wonder if a transponder could go on this?

2009-10-15 Thread Rocky Jones

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0910/15dscovr/index.html

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web

2009-10-14 Thread Rocky Jones

it will be entertaining to see how this progresses...most of the bleep sats die 
quickly...to much satellite for to little space...but lets see how suitsat 2 
turns out

I agree we need more Oscar 7's...

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web

2009-10-14 Thread Rocky Jones

Fred.  lovely radar but it hoses some people!  Robert WB5MZO

 From: fred.sanf...@ips.invensys.com
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com; n...@bellsouth.net; luclebla...@videotron.ca; 
 amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:17:47 -0400
 Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web
 
 I hope that AMSAT NA does not use an 70cm uplink, because that band is not 
 available for transmitting in all areas of the US.  I live near Cape Cod, MA 
 and 70cm is not available for transmitting because of PAVE PAWS.
 
 Fred - KA1CQD
 
 -Original Message-
 From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On 
 Behalf Of Rocky Jones
 Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:58 AM
 To: n...@bellsouth.net; luclebla...@videotron.ca; Amsat BB
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web
 
 
 http://www.qsl.net/pe1rah/HAMSAT.htm
 
 I am just trying to figure out why AMSAT NA is not taking advantage of work 
 already done.
 
 Robert WB5MZO
 
 _
 Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 
 
 *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
 files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
 addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally 
 privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its 
 status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete 
 this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
 purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. This email comes from 
 a division of the Invensys Group, owned by Invensys plc, which is a company 
 registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Portland House, 
 Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF (Registered number 166023). For a list of 
 European legal entities within the Invensys Group, please go to 
 http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_id=77nav_id=80prev_id=77. 
 You may contact Invensys plc on +44 (0)20 7821 3848 or e-mail 
 inet.hqhelpd...@invensys.com. This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be 
 subject to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its 
 subsidiaries and affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and 
 affiliates).
 
 
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web

2009-10-14 Thread Rocky Jones

John.  I was told by someone else that the problem was current use...but if 
ITAR is the problem, then it can be fixed.  ITAR is a pain but it can be dealt 
with particularly in this case...where there is no dual use capability.

As for AMSAT's ARISSsat transponder.  Well we will see if it works.  They are 
not exactly burning up the track record with success.  We have had this 
argument and I am willing to sit back and see if it goes, but it is far to much 
project for the program.  Most of the folks I know at JSC give it less then 20 
percent chance of working...In fact it was a source of mirth at a recent BDAY 
party.

Robert WB5MZO

 From: kd6...@comcast.net
 To: orbit...@hotmail.com; n...@bellsouth.net; luclebla...@videotron.ca; 
 amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web
 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:06:13 +
 
 AMSAT has a U/V linear transponder design in ARISSsat and according to the 
 last newsletter no foreign national has signed the agreement that ITAR 
 requires.
 
 73,
 
 John
 KD6OZH
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Rocky Jones orbit...@hotmail.com
 To: n...@bellsouth.net; luclebla...@videotron.ca; Amsat BB 
 amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 15:58 UTC
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT Symposium News Posted to the Web
 
 
 
 http://www.qsl.net/pe1rah/HAMSAT.htm
 
 I am just trying to figure out why AMSAT NA is not taking advantage of work 
 already done.
 
 Robert WB5MZO
 
 _
 Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 
 
  
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Can we get them to fix AO-40 first then?

2009-10-14 Thread Rocky Jones

Larry...

to add a few things to my post (and I admit this is speculation, someone from 
the command team can shoot me down at anytime).

As a spinner -40 was in trouble power wise.  I dont know but wonder if how 
the arrays were folded they would produce power while folded?  If not then 
the vehicle was seriously out of power (I probably knew this at one point, but 
it was a bit ago).  Spinners (like the Pioneer 6-9 Venus Pioneer and a lot of 
the communications satellites) are sized so that the part of the array 
viewing the sun is enough to power the spacecraft without the battery.   The 
batteries are only used for eclipse periods (which on geo's are very short).  
(as an aside I dug out my Pioneer 6-9 technical information and the battery was 
designed to automatically disconnect with an undervolt...that is one reason the 
probes are very long lived).

I bet you that in the spinner mode with the arrays folded -40 could only use 
some (One?) of its array sides.   That meant that for some part of the spin 
the battery was discharging, then had to be recharged as the spin continued 
then discharged etc.  I bet the battery and the associated circuitry were never 
designed for that.

If  -40 were to open the battery, I wonder if there would be enough power 
from whatever arrays are left to power the receivers (much less the 
transmitters) during the complete spin cycle.  IE without a battery I wonder as 
the vehicle spun if the receiver(s) would stay powered long enough to decode a 
command?   

If the aux battery isnt any good and the vehicle is left in spin mode, the next 
question would be (if they could get the command link up) is there enough solar 
exposure to operate anything?  (without a battery?)

It has been years ago (decades) so I have forgotten most of it, but when they 
tried to reactivate  Skylab before its doom...they had a similar problem with 
keeping the command recievers powered long enough to orient the arrays with 
thrusters and gyros..  As I recall they beat that by endlessly sending 
commands...and eventually they got the solar arrays oriented for real power.

In other words my speculation would be that -40 is useless without some type of 
battery, as a spinner.  I bet it is not much on three axis either since the 
arrays probably do not articulate...

As I said in my previous post...the more I think about it (and its all 
speculation) the less likely I think AO-40 will do a Seven

Robert WB5MZO


  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Can we get them to fix AO-40 first then?

2009-10-14 Thread Rocky Jones

The national intellegence assets which would be needed to get an image of 
AO-40 that showed things are probably there...but if you see the pictures 
they have to kill you (grin).

I know amateurs who have imaged -40 and done so enough to measure the light 
curve from it.

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Good story on TDRSS 1

2009-10-13 Thread Rocky Jones

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0910/13tdrs/

as I recall there were 50 some odd pounds of ballast launched with the 
bird...to bad it wasnt an amateur repeater.

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Good story on TDRSS 1

2009-10-13 Thread Rocky Jones

Yeap...it is generally either concrete or lead...and the concrete is 
favored..something in my memory says however the ones on TDRSS were lead.  
somewhere I probably have a picture of the ballast being attached to the 
bird.   Indeed I got a letter published in both AV Leak and Navy Times (as I 
recall) about the ballast...and other payloads.   I also recall the IUS upper 
stage carried ballast as wellto bad it wasnt an Amateur radio 
transponder...lots of power on TDRSS 1.

Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:36:07 +
From: w6...@comcast.net
To: orbit...@hotmail.com
CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb]  Good story on TDRSS 1



When I picked up these KLM's over in Lompoc, the fellow works at Vandenburg, 
and he told me that alot of the ballast is nothing but concrete !!  Can you 
imagine all that concrete chunks out there and they know where the majority 
areamazing.  


- Original Message -
From: Rocky Jones orbit...@hotmail.com
To: Rocky Jones orbit...@hotmail.com
Cc: Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:57:03 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [amsat-bb]  Good story on TDRSS 1


http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0910/13tdrs/

as I recall there were 50 some odd pounds of ballast launched with the 
bird...to bad it wasnt an amateur repeater.

Robert WB5MZO
   
_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Understanding ITAR

2009-10-06 Thread Rocky Jones

dont like simple questions?  

Robert WB5MZO

 From: g0...@aol.com
 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 03:16:45 -0400
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Understanding ITAR
 
  
 In a message dated 06/10/2009 04:49:14 GMT Standard Time,  
 orbit...@hotmail.com writes:
 
 
 Bob...why dont you give us an example of where ITAR has been  
 disadvantageous to the Amateur Satellite community
 
 Robert  WB5MZO
 
 
 
 Troll Alert
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: All Satellites

2009-09-25 Thread Rocky Jones

I would trade everyone of them that launched in the last 3 years for the first 
five on the list being active ...OK we have 1 out of the first 5 but all five 
would be nice...

BTW I am quite sure Oscar V is still in orbit...but without ANY solar cell 
ability...we wont be hearing from it againand it wasnt a transponder  But I 
still have a tape of it...!

BTW Xenia OH is a cool place...when I was TDY in  Cleveland for a bit a friend 
who worked where I was flying has a farm there...he recently sold me some 
Silver Appleyard duck eggs to stock our pond...

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:09:43 +
 From: ni...@ngunn.net
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Subject: [amsat-bb]  All Satellites
 
 Here's a list of all (known to me) satellites still in orbit with some 
 designed in (but not necessarily operational) 
 amateur band functionality.
 
 For those that think nothing has been happening recently, there have been 26 
 (so far) satellites launched this year, 13 
 in 2008 and 11 in 2007. Thats 50 birds in less than the past 3 years.
 
 Catalog NumberCommon Name International DesignatorComments
 1293  OSCAR 3 1965-016F   
 6236  OSCAR 6 1972-082B   
 7530  OSCAR 7 1974-089B   
 10703 OSCAR 8 1978-026B   
 14129 OSCAR 101983-058B   
 14781 OSCAR 11 (UoSAT 2)  1984-021B   
 16909 JAS 1 (FUJI 1)  1986-061B   
 20437 OSCAR 14 (UoSAT 3)  1990-005B   
 20438 OSCAR 15 (UoSAT 4)  1990-005C   
 20439 OSCAR 16 (PACSAT)   1990-005D   
 20440 OSCAR 17 (DOVE) 1990-005E   
 20441 OSCAR 18 (WEBERSAT) 1990-005F   
 20442 OSCAR 19 (LUSAT)1990-005G   
 20480 JAS 1B (FUJI 2) 1990-013C   
 21039 SL-12 R/B(1)1990-116B   
 21087 INFORMATOR 11991-006A   
 21089 COSMOS 2123 1991-007A   
 21575 OSCAR 22 (UoSAT 5)  1991-050B   
 22825 KITSAT B1993-061C   
 22826 POSAT 1 1993-061D   
 22828 ITAMSAT 1993-061F   
 22829 EYESAT A1993-061G   
 23439 RADIO ROSTO 1994-085A   
 24278 JAS 2   1996-046B   
 24305 UNAMSAT 1996-052B   
 25396 TMSAT   1998-043C   
 25397 TECHSAT 1B  1998-043D   
 25509 SEDSAT 11998-061B   
 25520 PAN SAT 1998-064B   
 25544 ISS (ZARYA) 1998-067A   
 25636 SUNSAT  1999-008C   
 25693 OSCAR 36 (UoSAT 12) 1999-021A   
 25756 KITSAT 31999-029A   
 26063 OPAL2000-004C   
 26545 SAUDISAT 1A 2000-057A   
 26548 TIUNGSAT 1  2000-057D   
 26609 AMSAT OSCAR 40  2000-072B   
 26931 PCSAT   2001-043C   
 26932 SAPPHIRE2001-043D   
 27605 RUBIN 2 2002-058A   
 27607 SAUDISAT 1C 2002-058C   
 27842 DTUSAT  2003-031C   
 27844 CUTE-1  2003-031E   
 27845 QUAKESAT2003-031F   
 27847 CANX-1  2003-031H   
 27848 CUBESAT XI-IV   2003-031J   
 27939 MOZHAYETS 4 2003-042A   
 28375 AMSAT ECHO  2004-025K   
 28650 HAMSAT  2005-017B   
 28890 BEIJING 1 (TSINGHUA)2005-043A   
 28891 TOPSAT  2005-043B   
 28892 UWE-1   2005-043C   
 28893 SINAH 1 2005-043D   
 28894 SSETI-EXPRESS   2005-043E   
 28895 CUBESAT XI-V2005-043F   
 28897 SSETI-EXPRESS DEB   2005-043H   
 28898 MOZ.5/SAFIR/RUBIN 5/SL-82005-043G   
 28941 CUTE 1.72006-005C   
 29252 GENESIS 1   2006-029A   
 29479 HINODE (SOLAR B)2006-041A   
 29655 GENESAT 2006-058C   
 29712 PEHUENSAT 1 2007-001D   
 31117 EGYPTSAT 1  2007-012A   
 31122 CSTB 1  2007-012F   
 31126 MAST2007-012K   
 31128 LIBERTAD 1  2007-012M   
 31129 CP3 2007-012N   
 31130 CAPE 1  2007-012P   
 31132 CP4 2007-012Q   
 31135 AGILE   2007-013A   
 31140 NFIRE   2007-014A   
 31789 GENESIS 2   2007-028A   
 32781 GIOVE-B 2008-020A   
 32783 CARTOSAT 2A 2008-021A   
 32784 CANX-6  2008-021B   
 32785 CUTE 1.7  AOD 22008-021C   
 32786 IMS-1   2008-021D   
 32787 COMPASS 1   2008-021E   
 32788 AAUSAT CUBESAT 22008-021F   
 32789 DELFI C32008-021G   
 32790 CANX-2  2008-021H   
 32791 SEEDS   

[amsat-bb] Re: All Satellites

2009-09-25 Thread Rocky Jones

Jim...very few of them have any potential for Amateur use at all...most however 
also die quickly.

Robert WB5MZO

 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:38:45 -0700
 From: kq...@pacbell.net
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org; kg4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: All Satellites
 
 Do any of these have potential for Amateur use after their primary mission 
 is completed? If they can be repurposed like AO-27, then I don't have any 
 complaints. If, OTOH, all they're good for is sending telemetry for 
 somebody's experiment, then I feel this is an inappropriate use of Amateur 
 frequencies.
 73, Jim  KQ6EA
 
 --- On Fri, 9/25/09, David - KG4ZLB kg4...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  From: David - KG4ZLB kg4...@googlemail.com
  Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: All Satellites
  To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
  Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 1:10 PM
  I hate to say it but you may be right
  - the sky is now full of 
  beep-beep sats!
  
  David KG4ZLB
  
  
  
  Rocky Jones wrote:
   The hamsat bands are slowly being converted into
  cheap telemetry bands...
  
   Robert WB5MZO
  
 
   
  


  
  _
   Bing™  brings you maps, menus, and reviews
  organized in one place.   Try it now.
   http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurantsform=MLOGENpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MLOGEN_Core_tagline_local_1x1
   ___
   Sent via amsat...@amsat.org.
  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
   Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
  amateur satellite program!
   Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
 
  
  ___
  Sent via amsat...@amsat.org.
  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
  Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
  satellite program!
  Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
 
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: All Satellites

2009-09-25 Thread Rocky Jones


 Perhaps when commercial vehicles like the Falcon 9 begin launching,
 we'll see a sufficient reduction in payload boosting costs to make
 raising the money for a HEO satellite with significant mass reasonable.
 We shall have to see.
 
 Mark K6HX
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Mark if there is a future for amateur HEO's the birds are going to be more 
Arsene and Oscar IV size.

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: All Satellites

2009-09-25 Thread Rocky Jones


 
 Finally, a truism that probably bears repeating, though not addressing
 the two comments quoted above: if we call cubesats 'not amateur
 radio', then we should tar OSCAR 1 with that same brush.
 
 73, Bruce
 VE9QRP
 ___
 Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Bruce...that is really not fair.

Oscar 1 (and 2) were first time for a lot of things and had at their heart 
the goal of building amateur radio communications platforms...that is why Oscar 
X (I think that is what they call it...a repeat of Oscar 1 and 2) was shelved 
in favor of Oscar III a communications platform.

Both Oscar 1 and II lasted until their batteries ran out...indeed I think 
Number 1 lasted until it decayed..Oscar V tested communications technology from 
spacecraft stabilization to command systems etc. and it lasted until its 
batteries ran out

.that is far longer sat life then most of the cubesats have.  which mostly have 
nothing to do with amateur radio

Robert WB5MZO
  
_
Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


  1   2   >