Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed?
Remember Ishq Bina piano version in Kahin Aag Lage song!! Well, a trivia: When did AR do this for the first time, can anyone tell!! (I'm strictly on a technical point) ;) Thanks, - On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:29 PM, fani kalyan rythmdivine2...@yahoo.comwrote: The starting humming of guzarish is the same(almost) as the second sax interlude in behka behka!!
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@yahoo.com wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed?
Duet.,..En kadhale .,.And i remember the audience clapping for prabhu as he switchd frm anjali back to en kadhale -- original message -- Subject:Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed? From: Amith Chandhran amithchandh...@gmail.com Date: 26/12/2008 3:42 pm Remember Ishq Bina piano version in Kahin Aag Lage song!! Well, a trivia: When did AR do this for the first time, can anyone tell!! (I'm strictly on a technical point) ;) Thanks, - On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:29 PM, fani kalyan rythmdivine2...@yahoo.comwrote: The starting humming of guzarish is the same(almost) as the second sax interlude in behka behka!!
[arr] Ghajini is a dumb film that celebrates its dumbness - Rajeev Masand
Plays it safe..doesnt mentions anything about the music... He gives it 3/5 http://ibnlive.in.com/news/masands-verdict-ghajini-is-dumb-and-celebrates-it/81344-8.html Cast: Aamir Khan, Asin, Jiah Khan Director: AR Murgadoss Watching him in Ghajini, I don't think I've seen Aamir Khan having this much fun as an actor in a long time. It's an old-fashioned entertainer with a half-convincing plot, packed with enough gratuitous violence to qualify as a B-movie really; and like the most popular B-movies ever, the biggest strength of Ghajini lies in the fact that it's a fast-moving roller-coaster ride that seldom gives you a moment to stop and think how stupid it might actually be. In a premise clearly inspired by Christopher Nolan's Memento, Aamir Khan plays Sanjay Singhania, a hot-shot industrialist who turns into an obsessed killing machine dedicated to tracking down his girlfriend's killer. Having been hit on the head with an iron rod, he suffers from short-term memory loss and can't remember anything for longer than 15 minutes; as a result he must tattoo his body with instructions that will lead him to his prey. Abandoning Memento's fantastic non-linear narrative and opting for the more conventional flashback device, writer-director AR Murgadoss throws in an engaging back-story in the form of leading lady Asin (playing smalltime model Kalpana) and a love story brimming with originality and the kind of gentleness that you don't see at the movies anymore. It's a romance that takes you by surprise, and to an extent puts the film's intense action into perspective too. Faithful remake of the director's Tamil blockbuster, Ghajini is over-the-top and exaggerated in its comedy, its action and its drama, but what irks you most are the half-dozen or so creative liberties and coincidences that the makers resort to, in order to bail themselves out of tricky screenplay situations. Here's a little sample - you're expected to believe that Sanjay Singhania is a well-known millionaire industrialist, and yet no one has seen him in pictures or in person. Logical loopholes like these would be the albatross of any half-decent film, but Ghajini works despite its shortcomings because it's a reliably dumb film that is unpretentious in its intentions. Unlike many dumb films that take themselves way too seriously, Ghajini is a dumb film that celebrates its dumbness. Of course much of the film's appeal lies in watching leading man Aamir Khan approach his role with an unmatched fervor. Whether it's beefing up for the part, or oozing that schoolboy charm, or then the manner in which he explodes in rage each time he's reminded of Kalpana's brutal death, you can't take your eyes off the screen when he's up there. He finds a worthy nemesis in Pradeep Rawat who plays bad guy Ghajini, your stereoptypical 80s Bollywood villain, complete with gold chains, white shoes and menacing sneer. Rawat is decidedly loathsome, especially in the scene in which he enjoys watching our hero writhe helplessly as he offs his girlfriend in front of his eyes. At the emotional heart of the film is Tamil actress Asin making her Bollywood debut as the mischievous, happy-go-lucky Kalpana, who benefits from a superbly-written character that is hard to get out of your head even when the film's ended. Asin has undeniable screen presence and such joie de vivre that you can immediately relate with the hero's anguish over losing her. In a thankfully small role as the medical student who helps our hero achieve his goal is Jiah Khan who has a screechy voice and a forgettable presence. Ghajini isn't a particularly good film, but entertainment it delivers by the bucketful. At a running time of 3 hours, the film seldom drags and therein lies its victory. For the Singh Is Kinng generation, here's another time pass entertainer. I'm going with three out of five for director A R Murgadoss' Ghajini, this is Aamir Khan's way of telling us, 'Anything that Shah Rukh or Akshay can do, I can do just as well.' Watch it for the ride. Rating: 3 / 5 (Good)
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Isnt it the responsibility of the Producers of the Movie. ?. why should AR bother about all these ? May be he left all these issues to the Producers of the movie... I think its a grave sin to question AR's ethics. and Pls dont use the words Rip Off for AR. It really hurts. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:28 PM, rayrai2k ravis...@gmail.com wrote: Are you questioning AR's ethics? I dont think he ripped the music anywhere from Memento. You should be asking the question to its producers and the story writers. Why AR? To avoid downloading and using pirated music, movie or software is individual ethics. You might be using softwares are you 100% sure that theres no pirated software or there is any software installed and used according to the norms in the agreement? Your question to AR can be solicited only if he had anywhere used the music from the predecessor. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepana...@... wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep -- regards, Vithur
Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed?
Not sure about this but someone was mentioning that the starting lines of Guzarish was very similar to the Reliance Mobile advt music. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, kishore parayath kishore.paray...@... wrote: GUZARISH main TUNE including the humming... is similar to PACHAI NIRAME...
[arr] Slumdog Millionairre ranked 8th On Yahoo movies BOX OFFICE
From 11th to 8th Position and released in only 589 Theaters. http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/boxoffice/ Cheers Niven (Mauritius)
[arr] TAXI TAXI
Taxi Taxi song's unique record In the recent film named sakkarakatti all songs are block buster hit which were composed by musical legend A.R. Rahman. He is known as Isai Puyal which means Musical Wind. In that film out of all songs the song Taxi Taxi which is a rap song has created a unique record that is this song has been played around 422 times in 30 hours. This record is unmatchable and no other song in Indian cinema has equalled its standards. Three cheers for A.R.Rahman. KAVISATHISH Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/
[arr] B.O. update:- 'Ghajini' has unprecedented start, collects Rs. 10cr. to Rs. 12 cr.
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/boxoffice_update/index.html B.O. update:- 'Ghajini' has unprecedented start, collects Rs. 10cr. to Rs. 12 cr. - By Taran Adarsh, December 26, 2008 - 11:41 IST The keenly-anticipated GHAJINI fetched the biggest start ever, shattering the record held by SINGH IS KINNG and GOLMAAL RETURNS, the two big openers of 2008. The paid previews were packed to capacity on Wednesday night and the film ran to almost 100% response throughout the country on Thursday. Studio 18, the distributors of the film, were in for a pleasant surprise. Having released two of the biggest openers this year -- SINGH IS KINNG and GOLMAAL RETURNS -- and also one of the biggest openers of 2007 [WELCOME], they couldn't believe their eyes when they saw the figures pouring in from all over. Exhibitors across the country were going into raptures, stressing on the cent per cent occupancy on Wednesday night [paid previews] and also Thursday [Christmas]. This writer was in constant touch with several exhibitors, who couldn't hide their excitement. The common feedback is, the crowd was uncontrollable, that the crowd inside and outside their theatres was the same, that the film was packed in advance for the entire weekend. Talking of numbers, the film collected approx. Rs. 2 cr. + in paid previews [a record], while the Thursday numbers were approx. Rs. 9 cr. According to early indications, the film collected between Rs. 10 cr. to Rs. 12 cr. nett, as per Studio 18. It's a new record, it's creating history
[arr] Review: Watch Ghajini for the four As
*Review: Watch Ghajini for the four As * *Movie* Review: Watch *Ghajini* for the four As *Director* A.R. Murugadoss *Cast* Aamir Khan,Asin,Jiah Khan *By Sonia Chopra * Not many films consider the villain so important as to name the film after them. The other film that comes to mind, tributing the villain this extent, is *Kill Bill*. The parallel doesn't end here. In a dimly-lit flat in Mumbai, we see a man ruthlessly killing another; then peering curiously over the body. That's Sanjay Singhania (Aamir), owner of Airvoice Telecom Company…wondering who he just murdered, as he suffers from temporary memory loss. But the name `Ghajini' on the dead man's phone brings back a flash of disconnected images that Sanjay cannot comprehend, leading him to futile aggravation. Each morning Sanjay wakes up wondering where he is; he sees the house littered with instructions: the one in the bathroom orders him to remove his shirt and he sees messages, phone numbers, the name Ghajini, and `revenge' inscribed all over his body. He knows he must settle scores – just against whom, and for what, is the question. Meanwhile a cop, on Sanjay's trail for the murder, gets hold of his diary. Sanjay's laddie picture on the first page, such a departure from what he is today, takes us to the back-story. High flying businessman Sanjay meets sprightly, mischievously lying Kalpana (Asin) who works as a small-time model with an advertising company. (Lots of laughs in this portion, courtesy Asin's natural flair for comedy) The scene where she, mistaking a journalist for an agency honcho, makes up details about her love life is hilarious. Sanjay, posing as a struggling model, woos her and then starts the most soulful, breezy love story you've seen in a long time. In most films, we rue that we don't feel for the characters enough to be involved in their story…here, you care so much, you sit in fearful anticipation at what's going to happen to the pair. That Sanjay and Kalpana's bond is resolute, we understand not through passionate hints, but everyday gestures…things people in love do for each other that surprise even themselves. Kalpana selling her new prized possession to fund Sanjay's mother's operation (a story he concocted) is what their love is all about. What raises Ghajini above other revenge dramas (and Hindi films have had their fair share) is its ability to sweep us off with the tender, real romance, and bring us back to coarse violence without much warning. Experiencing this contrasting milieu makes the film at once a thriller, a love tale, a drama. The violence is gruesome yes, but Aamir excels in the action scenes, and his wounded animal-like passion for retribution has us cheering blatantly. Like Uma Thurman's hunger for vengeance in *Kill Bill*, wiping off any distraction on the way, Sanjay doesn't rest till he gets to Ghajini, who, on his part, is one of the most spine-chilling, despicable villains in recent times. This, despite his character written as a largely single note one (the Tamil version was a double role). Pradeep Rawat as Ghajini (he was seen as Aswadhama in Mahabharat and Deva in Lagaan) is believably intimidating. Aamir Khan gives a layered, intense performance yet again, and is especially effective in the scenes where his frustration and rage is desperately looking for direction. Asin is the revelation here. She's a beautiful face, but that aside, the actress renders Kalpana so spunkily, you can't help fall for the character. Jiah Khan as the medical student Sunita who embroils herself in the clammy situation is good, but the character seems an intrusion. Thankfully, the resemblance to Memento (a film that Aamir had earlier admitted to neither liking nor caring for) is restricted to the tattooed messages, the Polaroid snaps, and the plot involving the murdered love of the protagonist. A R Murgadoss, while skillfully crafting the story together, sadly adds in improbable elements like Sunita risking her life to follow Sanjay's trail, Sanjay's 15-minute memory span expanding to accommodate a full-blown action sequence, or him getting back on his feet despite all his clues wiped off. Background score is persistently present and its obviousness invades into the scope for audience interpretation. Music is one of its high points, though one found the picturisation too conventional for AR Rahman's experimental tunes. Ravi K Chandran's (Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, Saawariya, Black) first-rate camerawork aids the storytelling. Editing is masterful and, though tad long, the film unfolds efficiently. For the four As—Aamir, Asin, A R Murgadoss and AR Rahman, this revenge drama gets a Grade A; recommended watching this extended weekend. *Verdict*: Three-and-a-half stars http://sify.com/movies/bollywood/review.php?id=14825158ctid=5cid=2425 -- regards, Vithur
[arr] Unnoticed songs of AR in 2008
Hai all, It is very sad to say that one song of rahman get unnoticed . These are the songs (gems )are unnoticed not bcoz of badness in compositions or lyrics. It is the fault of producers , if they did appropriate marketing or telecasting of these songs , thing would have been different. Example- Shannom song frm yuvarraj. These are the unnoticed songs in 08 which didn't get right appreciation . 1)Man Mohana-Jodha akbar 2) Whole ADA album especially Mehrebban song 3) Kahin to- Jaane tu 4) Maruddani- Sakkarakatti Regards ANEESH K S
Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed?
Yeah... noticed it at the very first hearing... typical AR... The search is more important than the destination - a r rahman - --- On Fri, 26/12/08, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com wrote: From: Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed? To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 10:21 AM I am surprised you guys are figuring that out now :) On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Vithur vith...@gmail. com wrote: absolutely true. Noticed this bro Of course you found it out ...Good observation On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:59 AM, fani kalyan rythmdivine2001@ yahoo.com wrote: The starting humming of guzarish is the same(almost) as the second sax interlude in behka behka!! Recent Activity 52 New Members 1 New Polls Visit Your Group Ads on Yahoo! Learn more now. Reach customers searching for you. All-Bran Day 10 Club on Yahoo! Groups Feel better with fiber. Check out the Y! Groups blog Stay up to speed on all things Groups! . Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/
Re: [arr] India Today reviews Ghajini 3.5/5
Does this reviewer totally forgot about the music?? The search is more important than the destination - a r rahman - --- On Fri, 26/12/08, $ Pavan Kumar $ pawancum...@yahoo.com wrote: From: $ Pavan Kumar $ pawancum...@yahoo.com Subject: [arr] India Today reviews Ghajini 3.5/5 To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 10:47 AM - Movie: Ghajini Director: A.R. Murugadoss Starring: Aamir Khan, Asin, Jiah Khan Rating: The movie opens with Aamir Khan shoving a tap into a particularly evil looking man's gut. There's more to come. Necks are twisted, bones crushed, iron rods connect with heads. Imagine a South Indian movie made in Hong Kong by John Woo's disciples and you get close to the kind of mind-bending brutality unleashed in Ghajini. Blood, thick, viscous and almost purple in colour, gushes from wounds. Eyes are bloodshot. Fists are bunched and ready to fly. This is a movie harrowing in its intensity. Yes it is adapted from Christopher Nolan's Memento and from A.R. Murugadoss's own Tamil version, but it is also made Aamir Khan's own, with a performance that is unflinching in its ability to absorb pain. There is the trauma of losing his memory, of seeing his girlfriend dying in front of him, of his own body being turned into a killing machine. Never before has a male body been used with such force in a Bollywood movie. This is not the glossy display of six pack abs and tightly packed butt that we've got used to. This is the body being used in vengeance, with every scrap of memory stored on it for recall (even the foot is not spared-the message there says insistently 'take the camera'). The story, as probably every Googleable person knows by now, is about a tycoon who goes on a mission to locate Ghajini, the man who killed his girlfriend and caused him to lose his long term memory. It's told in a series of non-linear flashbacks, the clues left in two diaries Aamir's character used to maintain, and in a series of other visual props, Polaroid pictures, messages written on his impressive chest, and words inscribed on every scrap of surface he can find. And in Asin, the South Indian actor who plays his girlfriend, Aamir is given a woman who seems worth killing for, even dying for. Channeling the other great export from the South, Sridevi (on a very strict diet), Asin plays a struggling model with a heart of gold. She's the kind who doesn't mind lying to get ahead in her work, but she also helps blind people cross the road and saves little girls from being sold for sex. She teaches our young tycoon, Aamir with hair, how to drink tea from a saucer and eat watermelons on the roadside. It is enough for us to believe his hair-less avatar, screaming in almost feral anger, will go to the ends of the earth to avenge her death. It's a technically accomplished film. Ravi K Chandran's camera makes the old and winding alleys of Hyderabad come alive with menace. Resul Pookutty's sound effects, echoing every click and crunch, are note perfect. Stun Shiva and Peter Heins have invented a new language of visceral violence-Hong Kong action cooked on a slow burn with South Indian masala by a cook listening to some heavy metal. The atmosphere of the film is moody in most parts, sunny in others, but the overhang of tragedy just will not let go. But if your heart weighs heavy when Aamir holds hands with Asin's apparition at the end of the film, complete with sunny maple leaves falling in slow motion, just attribute it to the performances. With every taut nerve in his face, every pinched muscle in his body, Aamir conveys the pain of a man who is battling a loss without measure. In Pradeep Rawat's Ghajini, though, there is a sense of disappointment. Is this a South Indian villain speaking in a Haryanvi accent? Or a Haryanvi villain looking very South Indian? Watch it, but keep a grip on your nerves. And the children safely tucked up in bed. At home. This is brutality, choreographed by a poet, and therefore that much more compelling. http://indiatoday. digitaltoday. in/index. php?option= com_contenttask=viewid=23548issueid=85sectionid=Itemid=1 Recent Activity 51 New Members 1 New Polls Visit Your Group New business? Get new customers. List your web site in Yahoo! Search. Y! Messenger Group get-together Host a free online conference on IM.
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
You totally got him wrong... he is NOT speaking about ARR's music at all... read carefully what he has written... its quiet shocking actually... The search is more important than the destination - a r rahman - --- On Fri, 26/12/08, rayrai2k ravis...@gmail.com wrote: From: rayrai2k ravis...@gmail.com Subject: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR... To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 12:28 PM Are you questioning AR's ethics? I dont think he ripped the music anywhere from Memento. You should be asking the question to its producers and the story writers. Why AR? To avoid downloading and using pirated music, movie or software is individual ethics. You might be using softwares are you 100% sure that theres no pirated software or there is any software installed and used according to the norms in the agreement? Your question to AR can be solicited only if he had anywhere used the music from the predecessor. --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ ... wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/ producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep Recent Activity 51 New Members 1 New Polls Visit Your Group Ads on Yahoo! Learn more now. Reach customers searching for you. Y! Messenger Want a quick chat? Chat over IM with group members. Group Charity i-SAFE Keep your kids safer online . Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/
[arr] Vote for the NDTV song of the Year 2008
http://movies.ndtv.com/songoftheyear08.aspx -- regards, Vithur
Re: [arr] Ghajini is a dumb film that celebrates its dumbness - Rajeev Masand
Can I ask why are we posing these reviews which don't even care to mention a single word about the music?? After all this is ARR's group not Ghajini or Aamir's... The search is more important than the destination - a r rahman - --- On Fri, 26/12/08, $ Pavan Kumar $ pawancum...@yahoo.com wrote: From: $ Pavan Kumar $ pawancum...@yahoo.com Subject: [arr] Ghajini is a dumb film that celebrates its dumbness - Rajeev Masand To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 7:05 PM Plays it safe..doesnt mentions anything about the music... He gives it 3/5 http://ibnlive. in.com/news/ masands-verdict- ghajini-is- dumb-and- celebrates- it/81344- 8.html Cast: Aamir Khan, Asin, Jiah Khan Director: AR Murgadoss Watching him in Ghajini, I don't think I've seen Aamir Khan having this much fun as an actor in a long time. It's an old-fashioned entertainer with a half-convincing plot, packed with enough gratuitous violence to qualify as a B-movie really; and like the most popular B-movies ever, the biggest strength of Ghajini lies in the fact that it's a fast-moving roller-coaster ride that seldom gives you a moment to stop and think how stupid it might actually be. In a premise clearly inspired by Christopher Nolan's Memento, Aamir Khan plays Sanjay Singhania, a hot-shot industrialist who turns into an obsessed killing machine dedicated to tracking down his girlfriend's killer. Having been hit on the head with an iron rod, he suffers from short-term memory loss and can't remember anything for longer than 15 minutes; as a result he must tattoo his body with instructions that will lead him to his prey. Abandoning Memento's fantastic non-linear narrative and opting for the more conventional flashback device, writer-director AR Murgadoss throws in an engaging back-story in the form of leading lady Asin (playing smalltime model Kalpana) and a love story brimming with originality and the kind of gentleness that you don't see at the movies anymore. It's a romance that takes you by surprise, and to an extent puts the film's intense action into perspective too. Faithful remake of the director's Tamil blockbuster, Ghajini is over-the-top and exaggerated in its comedy, its action and its drama, but what irks you most are the half-dozen or so creative liberties and coincidences that the makers resort to, in order to bail themselves out of tricky screenplay situations. Here's a little sample - you're expected to believe that Sanjay Singhania is a well-known millionaire industrialist, and yet no one has seen him in pictures or in person. Logical loopholes like these would be the albatross of any half-decent film, but Ghajini works despite its shortcomings because it's a reliably dumb film that is unpretentious in its intentions. Unlike many dumb films that take themselves way too seriously, Ghajini is a dumb film that celebrates its dumbness. Of course much of the film's appeal lies in watching leading man Aamir Khan approach his role with an unmatched fervor. Whether it's beefing up for the part, or oozing that schoolboy charm, or then the manner in which he explodes in rage each time he's reminded of Kalpana's brutal death, you can't take your eyes off the screen when he's up there. He finds a worthy nemesis in Pradeep Rawat who plays bad guy Ghajini, your stereoptypical 80s Bollywood villain, complete with gold chains, white shoes and menacing sneer. Rawat is decidedly loathsome, especially in the scene in which he enjoys watching our hero writhe helplessly as he offs his girlfriend in front of his eyes. At the emotional heart of the film is Tamil actress Asin making her Bollywood debut as the mischievous, happy-go-lucky Kalpana, who benefits from a superbly-written character that is hard to get out of your head even when the film's ended. Asin has undeniable screen presence and such joie de vivre that you can immediately relate with the hero's anguish over losing her. In a thankfully small role as the medical student who helps our hero achieve his goal is Jiah Khan who has a screechy voice and a forgettable presence. Ghajini isn't a particularly good film, but entertainment it delivers by the bucketful. At a running time of 3 hours, the film seldom drags and therein lies its victory. For the Singh Is Kinng generation, here's another time pass entertainer. I'm going with three out of five for director A R Murgadoss' Ghajini, this is Aamir Khan's way of telling us, 'Anything that Shah Rukh or Akshay can do, I can do just as well.' Watch it for the ride. Rating: 3 / 5 (Good) Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
[arr] Just got back from a 750 Km drive to Watch Ghajini!!
This movie should be appreciated!! Huge hardwork behind by murugadoss and crew!! Excellent watch. I havn't watched rahman's songs so well placed in a movie after Rang De basanti!! Music: ARR never woke up from his chair behind!! Flaws: Jia Khan. -Jamshid
[arr] [RM] I try to imbibe Rahman Sir's simplicity - Dance Master KALA
Dance Master Kala in Rahmania - Part II I have always found it comfortable to work with Director Balachander Sir, who is my Guru. He is my favourite and I am very comfortable working with him. He encourages women a lot and help them grow in their career. I havent received any scoldings from him till date, and on the other hand he has pointed at me thereby praising him and idolising at me. I have worked with Suhasini Maniratnam in Indra. Acham Acham Illai song was done by me. Its a very beautfiful song, and can never be forgotten in life. The speciality with Rahman Sir is that he gives us something which we would not have thought of. There is no greatness in giving a song which everyone would have thought of. Many Music Directors compose music,and we can predict that they would follow a particular style, but with Rahman Sir, it would be entirely different between what we think and what he does. His songs become more and more likeable as we keep hearing them again and again. When I met Suhasini Maam in her office, I listened to the song there and started liking it at the first instance, as I also do have lot of patriotic feelings in me. The shooting of this song was done at a place far off from Tambaram, with a group of students whom I organised with. Each and every word of that song was enjoyable and gave a different experience and happiness. We would have given formations similar to butterfly and also similar to India Map. Ratchagan - Soniya Soniya In that film, all choreographers took more than 12 days for finishing the song. There were some Union problems during that time, and hence they decided to shoot the film in Hyderabad. They told me that they would give me just 5 days for getting the song done. I was very upset and it was Nagarjuna Sir, who gave me comfort by saying that he had faith in me and we would do it very well. Rahman Sir didnt give us the full song, but gave us an outline of the track. He gave a lot of beauty to our movements through that song. In the BGMs also, he had just given an outline without the violins etc. I observe all his violin works with proper care, before I compose my dance sequences. I can never forget the way the song came out and also the dance sequence. Vande Mataram It was an opportunity which literally came to me, but went off from me, for which I really feel bad. It was Mr. Bala from Bombay who did the shooting of the song. They came to Chennai and discussed everything with me and left to Mumbai. I think the main problem was that they felt that the song would have suited well if it would have been done by Mumbai Choreographers. Then Mrs. Bala called on me ( I have done a lot of ads for them before ) and said that they wanted some North Indian Choreographers who would be doing it to suit it better. Its the only song which I always think I have missed doing choregraphy. You take any songs till date, but a song like Vande Mataram can never be done. Similarly, for Kalaignar Karunanidhi's Function, there was a dance programme, where Rahman Sir was standing in a corner and singing. I felt that it was like a shooting experience to me. Almost many songs of his, I used to feel that I could have done the same. Even in Telugu movies, I have done some movies of His. Many Actors Actresses used to be scary of Rahman Sir's songs, with the belief that it would be really tough to dance to his tunes. Even big and senior choreographers have opined that its very tough to understand the beats in his songs. But, I always like his songs and always select his songs when I do stage performance. I have done Margazhi Thingal from Sangamam on stage, and it was a great opportunity to me. I learnt a lot from Rahman Sir about his humility, and try to imbibe his qualities. Even now, after we met in Filmfare Awards, he greets everyone with simplicity with love and care. -- regards, Vithur
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
Agree with Gomzy here. Movie is OKAY. I loved Jamal's (Kid artist) performance - oh, you have mentioned this too. :) On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ). -- Sent from my very old 386 machine.
[arr] This year reconfirmed that Rahman is a terrific headhunter
The year AR Rahman scored big for emperors and slumdogs This year reconfirmed that Rahman is a terrific headhunter, says Lalitha Suhasini Earlier this month, I found myself roaming the streets of Dimapur, a nondescript, dusty city in Nagaland whose youth is fanatical about all forms of metal—white, death, thrash, speed; the heavier the riffs, the better. Posters of an upcoming White Lion concert were plastered all over town but there was no sign of Bollywood. Hell, the place didn't even have a movie hall. I bumped into a mobile download store at every corner—you could even download tones at the local *paan* store. So it was surreal when I saw a kid blast the *Yuvvraaj* number *Tu Meri Dost Hai* off his mobile. Every year, there's an anthem that endorses A.R. Rahman's talent. This year there were several, including the one our young man in Dimapur downloaded. Sixteen years into his career as a composer, 2008 turned out to be a watershed with the largest number of Bollywood releases till date for Rahman. He also launched KM Music Conservatory (KMMC) to train students in Western and Indian classical music soon after he launched his label KM Musiq. The fee is hefty but the composer has made sure there are grants and subsidized packages for deserving students. Rahman even engaged KMMC faculty in film soundtracks this year. So, Kavita Baliga, who teaches vocals, did the operatic parts in *Guzarish* from *Ghajini* and V.R. Sekar with Elidh Martin, who teach the cello, are featured in the soundtrack of *Yuvvraaj*. I'm sure students will show up on soundtrack credits soon. I remember Rahman sounding like an expectant dad as 2007 wound to a close—he was happy to announce that he had a slew of releases lined up for the new year. *Jaane Tu...Ya Jaane Na* had been held up over for a little more than a year due to production snags; *Jodhaa Akbar*, which was under production, had been pushed from 2007 to 2008; a Subhash Ghai project was yet to be titled (*Yuvvraaj*); and there was *Ghajini*. *Dilli 6* made it to his list as well but it is still under production and is now slated to be a 2009 release. *Ada: A Way of Life* and *Slumdog Millionaire* were the two big surprises. With*Ada*, Rahman, the geek that he is, opened himself up to a tech innovation: He allowed virtually anybody to remix two numbers (*Gulfisha*and *Gumsum*) off the film's score via Nokia's XpressMusic website. It was another first for Rahman, another leap into the future. *Gulfisha*, sung by Sonu Nigam, made a lot of noise but soon made way for the bigger hits in Abbas Tyrewala's directorial debut. http://www.livemint.com/2008/12/26214614/The-year-AR-Rahman-scored-big.html?h=B -- regards, Vithur
Re: [arr] Question on Ethics to ARR...
first of all, Ghajini is NOT Memento. Memento is an all time great movie, Ghajini is a cheap attempt to use the concept of short term memory loss and mix it with our usual Masala. The story lines / plot the whole objective of Memento is nowhere there in Ghajini. So your question is not applicable in the 1st place. 2ndly, ARR has nothing to do with any movie's storylines their sources. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:25 AM, pradeepananth pradeepana...@yahoo.comwrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep -- Cheers, Pradeepan. All you need to do is, decide what to do with the time that is given to you !
[arr] Music by A.R.Rahman gels well
Starring: Aamir Khan, Asin, Jiah Khan Direction: A.R. Murugadoss Music: A.R. Rahman Production: Tagore Madhu, Madhu Mantena Aamir Khan, the perfectionist is back with his new movie Ghajini. And for the first time in his career he has acted in a South remake. As always the marketing push by Aamir was exhilarating. The marketing done for the movie can be taken as a case study in many b schools as it tried uncharted terrains. With such a brilliant plan converted into hype, it made Ghajini the most sought after title to be released this season. Has it lived up to its humongous expectations? A definite Yes! This Hindi remake of the Tamil Ghajini which was again an inspiration from Hollywood's Memento pleased everyone with a tight screenplay and a top notch performance from the lead actors. The movie is about Sanjay(Aamir), a millionaire, who falls in love with Kalpana(Asin) a model. Kalpana gets into a hustle with a local gunda, Ghajini, who kills her and hits Sanjay with a rod which makes him a short term memory loss patient. Now Sanjay should fight against all odds to avenge the death of his beloved. How he does it with the help of a medical student Sunita (Jiah) forms the rest of the story. Audiences who have seen the Tamil version can get a little bored as A.R.Murugadoss has made very few changes to the script and scenes until the last 30 minutes. The screenplay is well laced with interesting events which makes the 3 hours running time well worth the ride. What, When and How are questions you should never ask in any masala movie, but there are a few scenes which does sparkle against its Tamil version. The last 30 minutes for instance is very good when compared to the Tamil version whose climax was literally laughable. Cinematography by Ravi K. Chandran is a major plus, as the pro has fully utilized the freedom the director has given and come up with stylish presentation of the scenes and innovatively captured songs sequences. Behka and Ae Bhachu song will surely sparkle in his already sparkling repertoire. His last see-saw camera movement at the fag end of the movie is just poetic. Editing is top notch. Stunts are choreographed brilliantly as it relies more on raw power than over the top flying antics. Music by A.R.Rahman gels well with the overall feel of the movie, Ghuzarish, Behka and all the other songs are brilliant compositions from the master musician but the background score is jarring at times, especially the Villian's BG which is certainly not expected from the Maestro. Aamir lives the role of Sanjay Singhania. If Vikram took a dog as an inspiration for his portrayal in Pithamagan, Aamir has taken a tiger for inspiration. His acting in the pulse pounding climax is a proof of how matured an actor he is; the pain, the intensity, the anger he showed here is so high that we could actually believe that the wound and damage attained by the strong henchmen of the villain is actually possible. As the sophisticated millionaire he is dignified and looks very handsome. His overly debated 8 packs has been flaunted effectively which is quite needed for the movie. Asin has done her role with élan, but the chirpiness in the Tamil version was missing a wee bit in this version but still a strong debut in Bollywood- kudos. Jiah Khan has a meaty role and she has used the opportunity to the fullest. She is a complete natural. Pradeep Rawant as Ghajini has done a brilliant job, much better than the Tamil Ghajini. Riaaz Khan who again dons the inspector role was over the top most of the time and a complete let down Overall the movie is a well packaged action masala entertainer, with some great acting, a tight screenplay, great music and some extraordinary action which makes it a complete paisa vasool. Go for it. http://streetromeo.wordpress.com/2008/12/25/112/ -- regards, Vithur
[arr] Indian Express interviews ARR on SdM
Notesmith Font Size Dipti Nagpaul D’Souza Posted: Dec 25, 2008 at 0230 hrs IST A R Rahman’s getting used to the recognition Slumdog Millionaire has got him Do the international recognition and Golden Globe and likely Oscar nomination for Slumdog Millionaire feel surreal? I hadn’t imagined when I first made the music that it’ll be such a huge success. But I was optimistic after watching the rough cut of the film that Danny Boyle sent me. A lot has happened since and the music has already won accolades. But honestly, I’m happier about the success of the film as a whole. How did you get the film? Danny had been tracking my music for some time. In fact, every time he liked a Bollywood score it turned out to be mine. So he planned to have me do a part of the project. But I told him that I’d either do it all or none. And he understood that I was asking for it because I could not put half a heart into the project and give him one score. I wanted to give it my all. Also, Anil Kapoor’s kids were instrumental in convincing the team to take me on for the project. How involved was Danny Boyle? To start with, I tried to see the film through his eyes. I found out what he does or doesn’t like about Bollywood films and their music. After an initial discussion, I e-mailed him four different ideas. He liked three of the four options; we then started interacting more. I kept sending him stuff and made a few short trips to London to meet him and finish the project. You’ve pushed the envelope with Slumdog, giving it a racy edge. There was stuff I’d wanted to do for a long time but could never try them in our film industry. When Slumdog happened, I saw it as the perfect opportunity to utilise those ideas, especially since I’d been given so much freedom to experiment. I then added to the music elements that would surprise the audience. Indian audiences however, may find it too noisy. I don’t think I can ever use this kind of music for our films because Indians like to listen to music again and again and this may not suit their palate. How did you manage to complete the music in three weeks? Danny was also concerned about the same. You can say I concentrated the energy of three months into those three weeks. It was hard work indeed, and I didn’t touch any other project at that time. It worked because we all really wanted it to work. Your work with artiste M.I.A. on O Saya is being applauded. How was the equation? It was great. And, it all started with a joke. M.I.A. said, ‘You always do romantic and sentimental music and my work’s very edgy. Let’s do a role reversal.’ I then sent her the music online — she didn’t even know the track because though she was present for the initial sittings, she had to later return since she was pregnant—and she sent me her work back. We then mixed it all together and it worked fabulously. What’s your opinion of the film? After Bandit Queen, this is the first film I have so much hope from. I like the contemporary touch and the technical work is commendable. The spirit of the city has been captured very well though there’s more resemblance with Mumbai in the past. Be it music, screenplay or storyline, a right balance has been maintained. When the film was being made, Warner Bros, which has invested in it, was not even supposed to release it—there was only a DVD release scheduled. But then the response was so great that they decided to take it across http://www.indianexpress.com/news/notesmith/402714/0
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
2008-12-26
Thread
ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni .
What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepana...@... wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep
Re: [arr] Music by A.R.Rahman gels well
On 12/26/2008 10:54 PM India Time, _Vithur_ wrote: Audiences who have seen the Tamil version can get a little bored as A.R.Murugadoss has made very few changes to the script and scenes until the last 30 minutes. The screenplay is well laced with interesting events which makes the 3 hours running time well worth the ride. What, When and How are questions you should never ask in any masala movie, but there are a few scenes which does sparkle against its Tamil version. The last 30 minutes for instance is very good when compared to the Tamil version whose climax was literally laughable. Could someone please highlight the differences in Tamil movie and Hindi movie? What was this 30 min climax in Tamil movie and what was the situations of songs in Tamil version? -- Rawat
[arr] Re: Indian Express interviews ARR on SdM
2008-12-26
Thread
ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni .
With every interview, you get to know new Info about the movie and the music. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gopal Srinivasan catchg...@... wrote: Notesmith Font Size Dipti Nagpaul DâSouza Posted: Dec 25, 2008 at 0230 hrs IST A R Rahmanâs getting used to the recognition Slumdog Millionaire has got him Do the international recognition and Golden Globe and likely Oscar nomination for Slumdog Millionaire feel surreal? I hadnât imagined when I first made the music that itâll be such a huge success. But I was optimistic after watching the rough cut of the film that Danny Boyle sent me. A lot has happened since and the music has already won accolades. But honestly, Iâm happier about the success of the film as a whole. How did you get the film? Danny had been tracking my music for some time. In fact, every time he liked a Bollywood score it turned out to be mine. So he planned to have me do a part of the project. But I told him that Iâd either do it all or none. And he understood that I was asking for it because I could not put half a heart into the project and give him one score. I wanted to give it my all. Also, Anil Kapoorâs kids were instrumental in convincing the team to take me on for the project. How involved was Danny Boyle? To start with, I tried to see the film through his eyes. I found out what he does or doesnât like about Bollywood films and their music. After an initial discussion, I e-mailed him four different ideas. He liked three of the four options; we then started interacting more. I kept sending him stuff and made a few short trips to London to meet him and finish the project. Youâve pushed the envelope with Slumdog, giving it a racy edge. There was stuff Iâd wanted to do for a long time but could never try them in our film industry. When Slumdog happened, I saw it as the perfect opportunity to utilise those ideas, especially since Iâd been given so much freedom to experiment. I then added to the music elements that would surprise the audience. Indian audiences however, may find it too noisy. I donât think I can ever use this kind of music for our films because Indians like to listen to music again and again and this may not suit their palate. How did you manage to complete the music in three weeks? Danny was also concerned about the same. You can say I concentrated the energy of three months into those three weeks. It was hard work indeed, and I didnât touch any other project at that time. It worked because we all really wanted it to work. Your work with artiste M.I.A. on O Saya is being applauded. How was the equation? It was great. And, it all started with a joke. M.I.A. said, âYou always do romantic and sentimental music and my workâs very edgy. Letâs do a role reversal.â I then sent her the music online â she didnât even know the track because though she was present for the initial sittings, she had to later return since she was pregnantâand she sent me her work back. We then mixed it all together and it worked fabulously. Whatâs your opinion of the film? After Bandit Queen, this is the first film I have so much hope from. I like the contemporary touch and the technical work is commendable. The spirit of the city has been captured very well though thereâs more resemblance with Mumbai in the past. Be it music, screenplay or storyline, a right balance has been maintained. When the film was being made, Warner Bros, which has invested in it, was not even supposed to release itâthere was only a DVD release scheduled. But then the response was so great that they decided to take it across http://www.indianexpress.com/news/notesmith/402714/0
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
Like i said, for us Indians, its really an ordinary movie. I know why the westeners are raving about it. But we have had such gripping stories told before and I as an Indian did not feel and could not connect with the movie at certain points. Sample this: The two kids speak polished english and hindi with a british accent.How can i as an Indian make any connection with that? I hope you get what i tried to say. My two cents :) On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Islam matthewis...@gmail.comwrote: I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@yahoo.com wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiye...@yahoo.co.in wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepana...@... wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high-profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
Hmm. That is a fair point. Hadn't thought of it that way. My friends and I were so gripped by the film that it didn't cross our mind. Thats pretty clever. Use some hindi and a lot of english.and some people would not notice...like us. Fair point. I get it. I assumed otherwise because I saw it with a few Bangladeshi's and Indians and they were gripped and we didn't question this. I hope it does well in India though when it comes out in January. Its got a LAagan type energy to it that makes me think, it will do well. Time will tell... Matthew On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@gmail.com wrote: Like i said, for us Indians, its really an ordinary movie. I know why the westeners are raving about it. But we have had such gripping stories told before and I as an Indian did not feel and could not connect with the movie at certain points. Sample this: The two kids speak polished english and hindi with a british accent.How can i as an Indian make any connection with that? I hope you get what i tried to say. My two cents :) On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Islam matthewis...@gmail.comwrote: I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@yahoo.com wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
Guys, moving further, I thought Mumbai was amazingly captured by Anthony Dod Mantle with 3 different kinds of camera(including a SLR) I hope ARR and Mantle get the nod for oscar nominations. About BGM, Rahman has tweaked a lot especially on O saya and Mausam and escape which actually sounds amazing, different from the soundtrack on CD. Now I want the rip of DVD version when it gets released --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Islam matthewis...@... wrote: Hmm. That is a fair point. Hadn't thought of it that way. My friends and I were so gripped by the film that it didn't cross our mind. Thats pretty clever. Use some hindi and a lot of english.and some people would not notice...like us. Fair point. I get it. I assumed otherwise because I saw it with a few Bangladeshi's and Indians and they were gripped and we didn't question this. I hope it does well in India though when it comes out in January. Its got a LAagan type energy to it that makes me think, it will do well. Time will tell... Matthew On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Gomzy gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Like i said, for us Indians, its really an ordinary movie. I know why the westeners are raving about it. But we have had such gripping stories told before and I as an Indian did not feel and could not connect with the movie at certain points. Sample this: The two kids speak polished english and hindi with a british accent.How can i as an Indian make any connection with that? I hope you get what i tried to say. My two cents :) On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Islam matthewis...@...wrote: I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzy gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
[arr] Music and Romance amidst Action/Violence: Ghajini
The film is about Action/ Violence and that is how it was advertized. In the ads there was hardly any hint of such a long romance between the duo. The open suspense was that Aamir's GF got killed and Aamir is out to take revenge. The body visuals of Aamir added to the same feel - he looked like a killing machine. So, when a viewer reached the theaters expecting a full meal of Action/ Violence, how would he react when he is served 50% of meal as Romance and Music. The prevalent logic says that the viewer would be disappointed, would feel cheated and would find that the romance was forced and superficial and the music is the speedbreaker of a fast paced film. But wait. Ghajini proved the above logic wrong. Why? 1. Asin. She made all her scenes natural, spontaneous, down-to-earth, lovely, enjoyable. Recall - when Aamir says he is busy and can't come, she remarks - Do joote maroongi... - ha ha ha. And the millionaire billionaire Aamir receiving the gift of some 1.42 lakh rupees from a struggler for the medication of his mother, he could help getting sold to her. 2. Aamir. He has put a lot of efforts in the movie. So much, that it would even discourage the teenagers who dream of a film/modelling career to fetch easy money, easy girls, fame. Aamir has shown that acting is not just by dancing around the trees. Aamir has performed such a stuff in reality that might have brought a thought of using the special graphics efforts. And not just his body when he became killing machine. His body in his earlier business tycoon part also looks well-maintained - all those pecs, all that bare chest, thin waist in gujarish was giving no clue that this guy is in 40s. 3. RAHMAN. This was a rare music which never became a speedbreaker in a fast paced action/ violence drama. I am not able to visualize any other Indian MD being able to give a music which would have merged so seamlessly in such a movie. Though, due credit is to be given to the director, choreographer, cinematographer for the lovely visuals - still the soul of this music is conceived by our man. btw, I had earlier said that visuals might help in understanding the significance of Lattoo and Bachchoo, but after seeing the movie, I find that visuals didn't help in me liking those songs any more. It was no rookhi-sookhi roti visual. First song appeared after half an hour (I saw the time). Till then, the movie was only action/violence part. Then Asin enters - and suddenly breaks up into Lattoo (or was it bachchoo?) It was supposed to release the tensions inculcated in first half hour. But no. It didn't. The fast paced song with cheap lyrics didn't help in that. It was just a song. Did anyone notice the parallel with Ho Ja Rangeela Rey? A wannabe actress daydreaming that the world is singing with her. But this latto or bachchoo was not the palest shade of Rangeela song - neither in music, nor in visual. It was revealed earlier in this list that the director had specifically asked ARR to give two such songs - sort of, with sadak-chhap lyrics, catchy music, and ARR delivered just that. But I think director was wrong in demanding that. Asin looks so elegant and decent that the cheapness of the song didn't gel with her persona. If the director has explained the situation correctly and given ARR freedom, ARR would have come up with a Ho-Ja-Rangeela song for the situation. -- Behka appeared exactly after 1 hour into the movie (I saw the time again), beautifully done. Quite fitting for the situation, though a shade open and overt and extrovert for a shy, serious Aamir till then who was not likely to fall such head and tail into love with a compulsive liar girl in spite of the good samaritan alterego of her, but the song is so lovely that nobody is complaining. Guzarish song soon after interval. The most advertised song of the album. Good situation. Good picturization. Good Aamir. And Kaise mujhe first part later on when Asin gives Aamir the bundle of notes. Kaise mujhe tune, melody, lyrics, mood, were 101% fit for the state of mind Aamir (and the viewers) were in at that very moment. I have stopped wondering how ARR catches such emotions of viewers and packs them in his songs. And Kaise mujhe female part further later, that didn't really fit as well as the first half, but nobody is complaining for such a good song. Director is not god, he can't bring 101% perfect situation every time. My bad. forgetting the situation of one song. Could someone please clarify whether the first song was latttoo or bachchhoo, and then where the other of these two was placed? -- btw, I am surprised to see so less no. of mails about Ghajini movie. Earlier films of ARR this year fetched many more mails. What is cooking? -- Rawat
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective. oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiye...@... wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans% 40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you blind you see. Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and challenges to channel his creative blood and energy. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Islam matthewis...@... wrote: I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy⢠gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
Re: [arr] Unnoticed songs of AR in 2008
Who didn't notice these songs? Well ARR fans ..all of us have lapped it up ...so no worries there ... As for other people, forget them - consider it their misfortune ...no need to feel sad :-) -A On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:42 AM, aneeshksasi aneeshks...@yahoo.com wrote: Hai all, It is very sad to say that one song of rahman get unnoticed . These are the songs (gems )are unnoticed not bcoz of badness in compositions or lyrics. It is the fault of producers , if they did appropriate marketing or telecasting of these songs , thing would have been different. Example- Shannom song frm yuvarraj. These are the unnoticed songs in 08 which didn't get right appreciation . 1)Man Mohana-Jodha akbar 2) Whole ADA album especially Mehrebban song 3) Kahin to- Jaane tu 4) Maruddani- Sakkarakatti Regards ANEESH K S -- -A http://viewsnmuse.blogspot.com
[arr] AR Rahman scored big for emperors and slumdogs
AR Rahman scored big for emperors and slumdogs BY LALITHA SUHASINI Mint Lounge, 27 december, 2008 E arlier this month, I found myself roaming the streets of Dimapur, a nondescript, dusty city in Nagaland whose youth is fanatical about all forms of metal—white, death, thrash, speed; the heavier the riffs, the better. Posters of an upcoming White Lion concert were plastered all over town but there was no sign of Bollywood. Hell, the place didn’t even have a movie hall. I bumped into a mobile download store at every corner—you could even download tones at the local paan store. So it was surreal when I saw a kid blast the Yuvvraaj number Tu Meri Dost Hai off his mobile. Every year, there’s an anthem that endorses A.R. Rahman’s talent. This year there were several, including the one our young man in Dimapur downloaded. Sixteen years into his career as a composer, 2008 turned out to be a watershed with the largest number of Bollywood releases till date for Rahman. He also launched KM Music Conservatory (KMMC) to train students in Western and Indian classical music soon after he launched his label KM Musiq. The fee is hefty but the composer has made sure there are grants and subsidized packages for deserving students. Rahman even engaged KMMC faculty in film soundtracks this year. So, Kavita Baliga, who teaches vocals, did the operatic parts in Guzarish from Ghajini and V.R. Sekar with Elidh Martin, who teach the cello, are featured in the soundtrack of Yuvvraaj. I’m sure students will show up on soundtrack credits soon. I remember Rahman sounding like an expectant dad as 2007 wound to a close—he was happy to announce that he had a slew of releases lined up for the new year. Jaane Tu...Ya Jaane Na had been held up over for a little more than a year due to production snags; Jodhaa Akbar, which was under production, had been pushed from 2007 to 2008; a Subhash Ghai project was yet to be titled (Yuvvraaj); and there was Ghajini. Dilli 6 made it to his list as well but it is still under production and is now slated to be a 2009 release. Ada: A Way of Life and Slumdog Millionaire were the two big surprises. With Ada, Rahman, the geek that he is, opened himself up to a tech innovation: He allowed virtually anybody to remix two numbers (Gulfisha and Gumsum) off the film’s score via Nokia’s XpressMusic website. It was another first for Rahman, another leap into the future. Gulfisha, sung by Sonu Nigam, made a lot of noise but soon made way for the bigger hits in Abbas Tyrewala’s directorial debut. Jaane Tu...Ya Jaane Na was an album cut for mass hysteria. Rashid Ali, who played the guitar in a jazz quartet at pubs in London, turned into a phenomenon with Kabhi Kabhi Aditi as did Benny Dayal, who sang the sassy Pappu Can’t Dance Saala. This year reconfirmed that Rahman is a terrific headhunter. His formula is simple: He needs to hear magic when the singers go behind the mike. Exactly the way an actor transforms a scene dynamically when he steps into the frame. It doesn’t matter if the guy has lost a talent hunt (Naresh Iyer) or is a music teacher in Suriname with no claim to fame (Madhushree). Rahman’s range as a vocalist expanded with each film too. If he surpassed himself with his tribute to Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan in Guru’s Tere Bina in 2007, there was Khwaja Mere Khwaja from Jodhaa Akbar which made the qawwali accessible again. And he kept innovating. Who would have imagined that he would direct the Chennai String Orchestra to magnificently pull off Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony Prelude in Yuvvraaj? The script allowed for lusty Western classical departures; sometimes film-makers such as Ghai and Mani Ratnam (I can’t wait for Raavan where Rahman and Ratnam reunite—it’s as thrilling as Quincy Jones and Michael Jackson every single time) are known to tweak their films around Rahman’s music. O.P. Nayyar and Naushad commanded such respect in the 1950s and 1960s but few composers have thereafter. Rahman has been accused several times of repackaging and re-recording his older tunes for a new audience. Even in doing so he’s managed to increase his fan base. Surely, few in the north would have picked up the soundtrack for Alaipayuthey but many must have enjoyed the soundtrack of Saathiya, the Hindi remake, as much or even more. Surprisingly, he hasn’t taken a single track off the hit Tamil OST for the Hindi version of Ghajini. Guzarish and Behka from the Aamir Khan-starrer are catchy melodies with Rahman teaming up again with Rang De Basanti collaborator Prasoon Joshi to sweep the charts. Slumdog Millionaire was a quick, quiet release. Rahman wrapped up the project in an astounding two months for Danny Boyle, collaborating with M.I.A.—the UK-based Sri Lankan wild child. Like Rahman, M.I.A. broke into the mainstream with her inimitable vocal style and razor rhythms. She spent her early years in Chennai and returned to record parts of her smash-hit second
Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed?
Same notes (tune) different key (arrangement)... Played to match shruti of Behka song... You would realize this more in Yuvraaj where Tu muskura tunes used in Man Mohini and Tu Meri Dost Hai... my_arr --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, fani kalyan rythmdivine2...@... wrote: The starting humming of guzarish is the same(almost) as the second sax interlude in behka behka!!
[arr]Komaram Puli schedule from 3 Jan
Komaram Puli schedule from 3 Jan The latest schedule of Pawan Kalyan’s Komaram Puli will be starting on 3 January and will continue till 15 February. With this schedule, the talkie part of the film will be complete. The songs will be shot in March and the producer is planning to release the film in Summer of 2009. Nikhisha is doing female lead. SJ Surya directs this film. Manoj Bajpai, Charan Raj, Saranya, Nassar and Ali play other important roles. AR Rehman provides music. Binod Pradhan handles cinematography.. Singanamala Ramesh Babu produces the film. http://www.idlebrain.com/news/2000march20/news288.html Puli is now komaram puli..and being a telugu guy i cant understand wht komaram means!!
Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed?
No no..noticed on da first day itself...but posted lately!! :P --- On Fri, 26/12/08, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upadhye@ gmail.com wrote: From: Gomzy™ gomtesh.upadhye@ gmail.com Subject: Re: [arr]Has anyone noticed? To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 10:21 AM I am surprised you guys are figuring that out now :) On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Vithur vith...@gmail. com wrote: absolutely true. Noticed this bro Of course you found it out ...Good observation On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:59 AM, fani kalyan rythmdivine2001@ yahoo.com wrote: The starting humming of guzarish is the same(almost) as the second sax interlude in behka behka!! Recent Activity * 52 New Members * 1 New PollsVisit Your Group Ads on Yahoo! Learn more now. Reach customers searching for you. All-Bran Day 10 Club on Yahoo! Groups Feel better with fiber. Check out the Y! Groups blog Stay up to speed on all things Groups! . Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
[arr] Jai Ho Music Video - HIGH QUALITY
Jai Ho Music Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ojJGt4UYOk Download Link (HQ) : http://keepvid.com/save-video.mp4?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fget_video%3Fvideo_id%3D9ojJGt4UYOk%26t%3DOEgsToPDskIjejHYwtHAqh9pgJ8EcY1z%26fmt%3D18
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
Please treat seniors with some respect. Now its come to this huh On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:48 AM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote: as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you blind you see. Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and challenges to channel his creative blood and energy. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Matthew Islam matthewis...@... wrote: I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzyâ„¢ gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
Can you tell me any composer who has been great in choosing scripts? On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:48 AM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote: as much as you would want to advertise that you have watched movies along with thalaivar, it is a very well known fact that ARR is pretty bad in choosing script. We all know ARR in and out. Now, just because ARR had chosen to do SDM doesn't make it's script one in a million. I think it is a beaten-to-death run-off-the-mill script. Love makes you blind you see. Frankly, I can tell you, I believe ARR didnot do SDM because he was memerised by the script but because it provided new avenues and challenges to channel his creative blood and energy. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Matthew Islam matthewis...@... wrote: I beg to differ on the ordinary bit. What sets it apart is the fact that it's a simple story but look at the treatment. What people are raving about is the tight script, music, acting and editing. The narrative has such force that the entire product over powers your senses. Successful films are ones which leaves you with an experience that you remember after you have left the theaters. I saw most people I know come out with a smile. Yes, it's not an extraordinary story. In todays age it's hard to tell one that we haven't heard before but what a beautiful execution of a story we have heard before. Our world is a dark one, as such when a character triumphs over such a dismal world armed with hope, perseverance, love, charm and faith. It displays a kind of tale that's considered extraordinary and your inner human nature falls in love with it. My friends in Bangladesh to ones in Mexico report unanimously that they haven't connected with a movie from their hearts, in a long while, like they have with SDM. The fuss therefore is about a movie which tells us what we know already, especially westerners (to think otherwise in a blanket bracketing is ignorant) in a way that's cinematically engaging is a victory for the makers of the film. So when a film as fresh and well made like this shows up in the western world they appreciate in hoards the brilliance of the work on display that is so different than the formula films or negative toned films that the west tends to make or stories of that natures they they seem to tell when you can get the effect from stories that are a little more close to reality. My two cents. Btw, AR Bhai displays his great knowledge of scripts that he composes for by choosing to do SDM or of being able to discern a bad movie from a good one when he sees it. From having seen movies with him, I know he has a great instinct about films. Regards, Matthew Islam Sent from my iPhone On 26 Dec 2008, at 11:25, rivjot riv...@... wrote: Very true, it was ordinary for Indian audience, but for western countries it was never before told experience/story. me too, loved kid Jamal the most! There was kinda unplugged version of O Saya at the end of end credits, loved that as well :D --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzyâ„¢ gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote: Got to watch Slumdog Millionaire. I was wondering what all the fuss is about :) But since we have been used to so much cliche in our movies that we find a heart touching, soul stirring movie to be silly. But SDM isnt bad.Infact you will love it as the movie unfolds. Go watch it for the excellent performances, the music and for the youngest Jamal. The small kid is so adorable ( especially when he tries to get an autograph of AB ).
[arr] T-Series acquires Slumdog Millionaire music rights for India
Jaane Tu, Yuvvraaj, Ghajini, Delhi 6 and now this... Hmmm... T-Series acquires Slumdog Millionaire music rights for India Story By: HETAL ADESARA updated on: 24/12/08 MUMBAI: Indian music major T-Series has acquired the music rights of the surprise hit of this year - Slumdog Millionaire, directed by Danny Boyle. T-Series chairman and managing director Bhushan Kumar confirmed the development to Businessofcinema.com. The movie will be released in India in January by Fox Star Studios. It stars Anil Kapoor, Irrfan Khan and Dev Patel. Slumdog Millionaire has so far bagged a total of 50 awards worldwide including four Golden Globe nominations on including Best Picture - Drama, Best Director for Danny Boyle, Best Screenplay for Simon Beaufoy, and Best Original Score for A R Rahman. Apart from this, the movie was also honored with two awards from the Los Angeles Film Critics Association, one from the New York Film Critics' Circle, as well as six nominations for the Critics Choice Awards including Best Picture.
Re: [arr] Will miss you Sridhar Sir!
Rest in Peace Sridhar Sir, Well you have been a towering personality in the Indian Global Music Industry, it's sad unfortunate about your untimely demise coming to my notice during a premier show of Ghajini here in Australia..till then i did not know that you had departed from earth attained salvation..i frankly have to kick myself for not being in touch with the media, mails or news for the past 2 months..I'm sorry but guess Sridhar sir you Rahman made a deadly combination in creating innovative sounds... Rest in Peace May you soul attain Salvation at the holy feet of Lord Emperuman Regards, On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:56 AM, sushma g_s...@yahoo.com wrote: A loss something unparalleled... :( Every time I hear Hariharan breathe Uyire, I will continue to think of the guy who has recorded it or the water flow - Flute in 2nd BG in Athangara marame or estatic 2nd Bg of Taal se Taal Oh there are so many! One guy who has been right through the journey of AR. Recorded every single piece that AR has done. Has been an integral part of several movies of Maniratnam, Kamal Hassan etc... A colossal loss to the arts,entertainment industry. Sir, Thanks for being an inspiration to people like me! May your peaceful soul continue rest in peace.
Re: [arr] MY DESIGN IDEA OF ARR DB/SEARCH SITE
Nice effort. Good. Thanks On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 9:57 AM, rakesh kumar rak_d_ku...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all, Its my interpretation how the ARR Search site should be. I want to keep it simple ala.. Google search.. . I have added only few search option as this is a draft. I know w can get full arr discography in ARR official website and appreciate the guys doing it.. but if will be great if we can search anything about arr movie by year, movie name, actor, director, language. etc etc.. Your ideas are welcome..I am not good at programming, but can take care the visual design part. ARR Rules Rakesh -- regards, Vithur
Re: [arr]Komaram Puli schedule from 3 Jan
Komaram may be the name of some Place in AP. Is it ? some distant village in Rayalaseema District. 2008/12/27 fani kalyan rythmdivine2...@yahoo.com *Komaram Puli schedule from 3 Jan* The latest schedule of Pawan Kalyan's Komaram Puli will be starting on 3 January and will continue till 15 February. With this schedule, the talkie part of the film will be complete. The songs will be shot in March and the producer is planning to release the film in Summer of 2009. Nikhisha is doing female lead. SJ Surya directs this film. Manoj Bajpai, Charan Raj, Saranya, Nassar and Ali play other important roles. AR Rehman provides music. Binod Pradhan handles cinematography. Singanamala Ramesh Babu produces the film. http://www.idlebrain.com/news/2000march20/news288.html Puli is now komaram puli..and being a telugu guy i cant understand wht komaram means!! -- regards, Vithur
[arr] AR's voice
Hi, I find his voice is the most unique and while he sings it sounds like somebody singing in his twenty's. Also the range is quiet unique. Another friend on mine had once said if theres any other who matches that range was Micheal Jackson. While listening to Jiya Se Jiya O Saaya his voice sounds very fresh and young. Could somebody add more of your thoughts
[arr] A.R.Rahman has left nothing unturned to show his genius
Finally, the much awaited and publicized Aamir Khan's 'Ghajini' has seen the light of the day. Two days before the scheduled release on Merry Christmas, the Madras High Court had restrained its screening. However, as the luck would have the court's division bench stayed that restrain order and opened the doors for its release. As expected, the movie has had a huge advance booking and created a houseful scenario in the capital of India. Incidentally, the movie's original Tamil version was also a major hit, and so 'Ghajini' in Hindi has proved its credential on the opening day and has been doing better everyday even in the wake of fierce competition from Akshay Kumar starrer animation movie titled 'Jumbo'. Since Aamir is a perfectionist, he has left no stone unturned to hit his usual target of perfection. Looking at 'Ghajini', we find it very rewarding due to its very story. Besides, director A.R. Murugadoss tells the story in a wonderful way. And on top of all this, the movie has Aamir Khan at the helm of affairs. So, the movie has to succeed at the box office. No surprise! The movie runs for full three hours and that too without boring the viewer who is now accustomed to a shorter duration. The viewer gets stuck to his seat and forgets that there is going to come an interval too. He story keeps you guessing about the next scene. Then there is no scope for getting bored. Yes, the genre of the movie isn't very different though for Aamir it is as the latter has been moving from one to another in his movies. In spite of it being the usual Bollywood stuff, the screenplay keeps one glued to his or her seat. The reason is simple that the same story has been told differently with a lot of twists. Though it's a war between the good versus evil , yet it's free from the so called violence. The good prevails over the evil and brings solace to the audience. That's all. click for larger view http://ww.smashits.com/news/bollywood/movie-review/7035/a-fantastic-movie.html#The story goes like Aamir Khan suffers an extreme memory loss following the murder of his girlfriend Asin. But the loss of memory is short-lived. He goes to work and slowly but steadily regains the memory .Thus, he remembers his love interest and tries to pursue his lost path. He carries with himself Polaroids that remind him of his past. In this movie, Aamir tattoos them on his body, which constantly remind his mind . click for larger view http://ww.smashits.com/news/bollywood/movie-review/7035/a-fantastic-movie.html#After all, one cannot go on weaving innumerable stories. However, he can certainly change the style of narration or presentation. That provides relief to one's eyes and captures one's attention without falling a prey to the repetition. This is the style of 'Ghajini's original, meaning Tamil version director A.R. Murugadoss. He starts off with what happens in the past, comes to the present, falls back in time and thus returns to the earlier theme. Again, the loss of memory in a movie isn't new. Many movies have shown a sort of amnesia. But, 'Ghajini's memory loss is very different inasmuch as the hero recalls events but for 15 minutes only. Aamir has displayed extraordinary skill in the portrayal of a man suffering from short-term memory loss. He doesn't speak but says everything through his eyes - body language. Every narration is full of that's the beauty ! Thus, the movie will be remembered for long. Every expression is strong enough to tells a lot. This saves the movie showing undesirable fighting scenes and turning the movie into a violent one. click for larger view http://ww.smashits.com/news/bollywood/movie-review/7035/a-fantastic-movie.html#Acting-wise, Aamir is superb. We have never seen the actor performing so well. Less said the better about his look, his hairstyle and his physique. The movie may inspire thousands of its viewers to gym for wellness, if not for his memorable body. His body movement is great indeed! Historically, following the success of his Tamil movie, the director was looking for an actor to play his bold character of Shiva. When he met with A. R. Rehman and asked him to name a Bollywood actor for the coveted role, the latter suggested Aamir Khan for the lead role. Aamir accepted the offer but with a rider that he would begin its shoot after eight months. click for larger view http://ww.smashits.com/news/bollywood/movie-review/7035/a-fantastic-movie.html#To do full justice to play this role, Aamir underwent fitness training under his Guru Satya for six months - working in gym from four to six hours every day. In fact, once he broke his knee during the shooting of a stunt and deferred the shoot for a month! Another interesting matter is that the director had first signed Kangna Ranaut but later replaced her with Ziah Khan at the instance of Aamir. Kangna had reportedly leaked out to the media that she has bagged the coveted role. The director had decided to repeat his heroine Asin for the Hindi
[arr] A R Rahman's musical technique.
A R Rahman's Slumdog Millionaire OST *This isn't a review. Just a few quick observations on A R Rahman's musical technique.* When I started watching *Slumdog Millionaire*, I was trying to guess whether the soundtrack and background music was by A R Rahman. I didn't know because I saw the film without reading or following too much about it. I wanted to watch it with no preconceived notions. The opening chase song *O...Saya *had * *a characteristic Rahman feel - expansive sound, ARR-sounding vocals and a train beat to go with the train visual. But M.I.A's arrival on vocals threw me off the scent. Then I got so caught up in the film that I stopped thinking about it. A compliment for good film technique (and background music ) is that it doesn't draw attention to itself outside the context of the film while you're watching. The music fits the film perfectly. During the song-and-dance end credits though, there was a point when Sukhvinder starts singing the chorus *Jai Ho*. He starts by himself with a backing layer of keyboards. Sometime into the second refrain, an additional layer of music kicks in, making for a goosebump moment. At that point (maybe a minute before Rahman's name pops up in the credits), I had my answer. No one quite layers sound for effect like he does. He draws you out slowly, adding layer on layer, preparing you for a final assault and a pitch-perfect crescendo. Another interesting technique that I noticed is the use of voice as sound. While his liking for fresh playback voices is well-known, what is probably not appreciated is how those voices add to the 'sound' and feel of a song. An example that immediately comes to mind is the female playback singing in *Pappu Can't Dance! *and the use of Vasundhara Das for barely two lines* *in *Kahin To*.* The use of Mahalaxmi Iyer( or is it Tanvi Shah?) on vocals in *Jai Ho* does that perfectly. Complimenting Sukhvinder's earthy voice and the Spanish-sounding chorus, that voice breaks through and registers on a different level. I'd have expected Alka Yagnik or someone similar to sing that exuberant love song but he surprises us, defying our musical expectations to come through with something bordering on the sublime. **Vishal-Shekhar's use of Preeti and Pinky in Bluffmaster for Say Na Say Na qualifies too* *http://ajayvb.blogspot.com/2008/12/r-rahman-slumdog-millionaire-ost.html* -- regards, Vithur
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
You are listening to songs of a guy who promotes people who break copyright laws. You are not only encouraging him but also an accomplice. Partner in crime! Now how about your ethics? On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 4:25 AM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective. oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiye...@... wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.comarrahmanfans% 40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Wah what a comparison? AM studio to Terrorism. One believes completely is peace loving and filled with love towards humanity, tries to unite humans. The other exactly believes in the opposite. Your thought itself speaks out you didn't do it right. Also ethics of killing is different than the art. So is the law. If I have to speak in your words get this fact Kalashnikov invented the gun for protecting his motherland from the hands of enemies. Will his ethics be questioned if its used for killing innocent? Scientists strive hard to develop theories science should they be executed if their work is used for mass destruction? --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@... wrote: Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective. oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote: Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiyer15@ wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans% 40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep
Re: [arr] [RM] I try to imbibe Rahman Sir's simplicity - Dance Master KALA
// Similarly, for Kalaignar Karunanidhi's Function, there was a dance programme, where Rahman Sir was standing in a corner and singing. I felt that it was like a shooting experience to me. Almost many songs of his, I used to feel that I could have done the same. // I was there at the venue, watching it live! what a moment it was A group of girls was dancing for Vande Mataram song... ARR was in the audience Just after the second charanam, ARR suddenly went up the stage, took the mic and started singing along Thaai Manne Vanakkam It was such a sweet surprise!! :) After the song got over, the anchor asked ARR to sing... but ARR refused saying something like neenga kekkaama naaney vandhu paditten... podhumey (I came and performed without being requested!! Isnt this enough? He smiled and walked off, to a thunderous applause!! :) I still remember it as though it were only yesterday!! unforgettable!!! :D Cheers, Aravind http://arrahmaniac.blogspot.com Download Rahmania show interviews at http://rahmania.4shared.com --- On Fri, 26/12/08, Vithur vith...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vithur vith...@gmail.com Subject: [arr] [RM] I try to imbibe Rahman Sir's simplicity - Dance Master KALA To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 26 December, 2008, 10:34 PM Dance Master Kala in Rahmania - Part II I have always found it comfortable to work with Director Balachander Sir, who is my Guru. He is my favourite and I am very comfortable working with him. He encourages women a lot and help them grow in their career. I havent received any scoldings from him till date, and on the other hand he has pointed at me thereby praising him and idolising at me. I have worked with Suhasini Maniratnam in Indra. Acham Acham Illai song was done by me. Its a very beautfiful song, and can never be forgotten in life. The speciality with Rahman Sir is that he gives us something which we would not have thought of. There is no greatness in giving a song which everyone would have thought of. Many Music Directors compose music,and we can predict that they would follow a particular style, but with Rahman Sir, it would be entirely different between what we think and what he does. His songs become more and more likeable as we keep hearing them again and again. When I met Suhasini Maam in her office, I listened to the song there and started liking it at the first instance, as I also do have lot of patriotic feelings in me. The shooting of this song was done at a place far off from Tambaram, with a group of students whom I organised with. Each and every word of that song was enjoyable and gave a different experience and happiness. We would have given formations similar to butterfly and also similar to India Map. Ratchagan - Soniya Soniya In that film, all choreographers took more than 12 days for finishing the song. There were some Union problems during that time, and hence they decided to shoot the film in Hyderabad. They told me that they would give me just 5 days for getting the song done. I was very upset and it was Nagarjuna Sir, who gave me comfort by saying that he had faith in me and we would do it very well. Rahman Sir didnt give us the full song, but gave us an outline of the track. He gave a lot of beauty to our movements through that song. In the BGMs also, he had just given an outline without the violins etc. I observe all his violin works with proper care, before I compose my dance sequences. I can never forget the way the song came out and also the dance sequence. Vande Mataram It was an opportunity which literally came to me, but went off from me, for which I really feel bad. It was Mr. Bala from Bombay who did the shooting of the song. They came to Chennai and discussed everything with me and left to Mumbai. I think the main problem was that they felt that the song would have suited well if it would have been done by Mumbai Choreographers. Then Mrs. Bala called on me ( I have done a lot of ads for them before ) and said that they wanted some North Indian Choreographers who would be doing it to suit it better. Its the only song which I always think I have missed doing choregraphy. You take any songs till date, but a song like Vande Mataram can never be done. Similarly, for Kalaignar Karunanidhi's Function, there was a dance programme, where Rahman Sir was standing in a corner and singing. I felt that it was like a shooting experience to me. Almost many songs of his, I used to feel that I could have done the same. Even in Telugu movies, I have done some movies of His. Many Actors Actresses used to be scary of Rahman Sir's songs, with the belief that it would be really tough to dance to his tunes. Even big and senior choreographers have opined that its very tough to understand the beats in his songs. But, I always like his songs and always select his songs when I do stage performance. I have done
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
This is completely ridiculous.If I tell you that the Rice that you eat, is coming from a piece of land, owned by a farmer who beats up his Wife would you stop eating ?? Would you be willing to make an effort to find out ??!!! we all know for a fact that we pollute the earth by driving...isn't that unethical towards our future generation ? :)) lets not bring ARR into unnecessary stuff. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective. oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiye...@... wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.comarrahmanfans% 40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep -- Cheers, Pradeepan. All you need to do is, decide what to do with the time that is given to you !
[arr] Great AR Rehman stuff
Just to get off a few things off my chest. I'm no movie critic either. Nevertheless, I thought Slumdog was an OK movie. Technically good, great AR Rehman stuff, but lacks that 'Wow! what a movie' at the end. Compare this movie (if one can) to movies like Gandhi, The Godfather, Cleopatra, even City of Joy - slumdog can't hold a candle to any of those movies. It is also important, as sophisticated Assamnetters, that conclusions like 'weak Indians', or whatever, are not drawn just because some like the movie or others dislike the movie. IMHO - an argument on such basis is not just extraneous, but is also trying desparately to find reasons why anyone could not heap praises on the movie because every other Western reviewer and his uncle is going gaga over the movie. City of Joy (COJ, 1992) - don't know if it won any accolades was a great movie, and it also had all the stuff that 'the not so weakminded Indians' might love - poverty, crime, and struggle, the REAL INDIA. Was Slumdog better than COJ - I really don't think so. It just boggles the mind, why an individual can not just like or dislike a movie on what they see as merits or demirits of the movie without their character being questioned. Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today. In order to make spiritual progress you must be patient like a tree and humble like a blade of grass. http://assamnet.org/posts/index.php?t=rviewgoto=6232th=3122#msg_6232 -- regards, Vithur
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
To clarify, I am not ethics police here and not accusing ARR of anything. Just trying to get a sense for what his (and everyone's) perspective on this is. I think Vivek put it really beautifully in terms of distinguishing between laws and morals. This is really about what moral standards does ARR subscribe to and whether there is an opportunity here for him to hold himself and the rest of the industry to higher standards. Other things to consider: Whether Ghajini and Memento or similar or not is to be decided based on international law and I have a strong feeling that intellectual property experts will certainly rule this as a case of plagiarism. As for the related question around what happens if ARR rents his studio out to MDs who plagiarize, its probably a good idea that ARR writes in contracts with those MDs that indemnify him in case they are sued over copyright infringement laws. As for the rice/farmer issue, the people who refuse to drink Starbucks coffee or wear Nike shoes because of alleged violation of fair trade laws or labor laws will certainly not want to consume the rice from the farmer who beats up his wife. They will want to get it from more 'ethically appropriate' sources. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Pradeepan R pradeepanisonl...@... wrote: This is completely ridiculous.If I tell you that the Rice that you eat, is coming from a piece of land, owned by a farmer who beats up his Wife would you stop eating ?? Would you be willing to make an effort to find out ??!!! we all know for a fact that we pollute the earth by driving...isn't that unethical towards our future generation ? :)) lets not bring ARR into unnecessary stuff. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@... wrote: Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective. oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com, Gomzy gomtesh.upadhye@ wrote: Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiyer15@ wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.comarrahmanfans% 40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is
Re: [ARR] For an Indian , SDM is ordinary.
On 12/27/2008 9:33 AM India Time, _Gomzy™_ wrote: Can you tell me any composer who has been great in choosing scripts? But, what is the drawback in ARR choosing SDM? When I had first heard that ARR has done something called SDM, I thought it would be another of those Deepa Mehta type of movies that ARR did because he doesn't know how to say no, but, see what all publicity, what all nomination, what all international focus SDM has got to ARR and to India. So, now I feel that ARR was absolutely correct in doing SDM. No other movie has got this much publicity out of India. -- Rawat Are you searching for a reason, to be kind? b Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Magic. Only at arrahmanfans.com - The definitive A.R.Rahman e-community. Homepage: http://www.arrahmanfans.com Admin: ad...@arrahmanfans.com To Subscribe: arrahmanfans-subscr...@yahoogroups.com To Unsubscribe: arrahmanfans-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.comyahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arrahmanfans/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:arrahmanfans-dig...@yahoogroups.com mailto:arrahmanfans-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: arrahmanfans-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[arr] Why no much talk abt Ghajini BGM
also ..I personally feel that the BGM is not so impressive..The AR touch and thump is missing..maybe coz I expected too much or the sound system where I watched is bad or like for the songs..the BGM also takes time to grow on?!!!
Re: [arr] AR's voice
The metallic nature of his voice is his special highlight and strength. Its the same as of now, as it was when he first sang yelelo in the interlude of Chinna Chinna aasai On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:31 AM, rayrai2k ravis...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I find his voice is the most unique and while he sings it sounds like somebody singing in his twenty's. Also the range is quiet unique. Another friend on mine had once said if theres any other who matches that range was Micheal Jackson. While listening to Jiya Se Jiya O Saaya his voice sounds very fresh and young. Could somebody add more of your thoughts -- regards, Vithur
[arr] SDM-MY take
Fellow ARR-Fans, Got to watch SDM in bay area(california) and what a crowdI am speechless with this movie.danny boyle /ARR combo has done the magic.Loved the screenplay/editing and the sounds of the movie.With 95% of crowd being locals and them appriciating the movie until the end credits and giving a big clap at the end gave me goose bumps... My salute to ARR/Danny boyle for believing in a quality theme among commercial formulas I am definitely seeing the crowds are getting it Wishing my good luck for ARR for the Golden Globe and much more further
[arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Give me a chance of writing about ethics. Once a person went to a shop to purchased for Rs.50 and then paid him Rs 100. The shopkeeper returned 70 by mistake as a remainder. The person left the shop. It was late by when the shopkeeper realized his mistake. After a couple of days the same person went to the same shop and again purchased stuff worth Rs 50. Again he paid 100. This time the shopkeep recognized the person and returned Rs 30. Seeing the less amount the person questions the shopkeeper why is he returning Rs 20 less and it wasn't ethical. For which the shopkeeper reminded him of the incident couple of days back where he took Rs 20 more and where was his ethics then. The person was too quick to respond saying his ethics had allowed him to forgive the mistake of the shopkeeper once. But not twice of repeating the same mistake. Now you decide who is more ethical and I am sure its very much debatable. And both are right. So When AR is renting his studio and if he makes the MD sign an agreement not to use other person's work.. it nay be good ideally but whats wrong if somebody says he was inspired of another work. We too try to imitate and follow other. Memento might have also used some other story based upon Short term memory loss and vengeance. Think about Titanic itself or even the Da Vinci code.. In the former it was the ship sinking story told in its own masala and the later uses the search for Holy Grail in its own way. Da Vinci code story was claimed as a plagarism of holy Blood Holy Grail. But the laws gave a clean chit. Now does it mean Laws are without ethics? If yes, then why are we made to follow? Known it has flaws but these flaws sometimes create much better work. It gives an opportunity for individual to sometimes use and then recreate by adding contributions. If every plagiarism was to be stopped then the first and the foremost thing that should be stopped is the university exams we make use of the content in a book, read, memorize and then write it as answers in the exam. Isn't it plagiarism? Was the answers any time our/your own? I studies in the university which has patterns of open book exams. Its the biggest plagiarism. How about ethics here? --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepana...@... wrote: To clarify, I am not ethics police here and not accusing ARR of anything. Just trying to get a sense for what his (and everyone's) perspective on this is. I think Vivek put it really beautifully in terms of distinguishing between laws and morals. This is really about what moral standards does ARR subscribe to and whether there is an opportunity here for him to hold himself and the rest of the industry to higher standards. Other things to consider: Whether Ghajini and Memento or similar or not is to be decided based on international law and I have a strong feeling that intellectual property experts will certainly rule this as a case of plagiarism. As for the related question around what happens if ARR rents his studio out to MDs who plagiarize, its probably a good idea that ARR writes in contracts with those MDs that indemnify him in case they are sued over copyright infringement laws. As for the rice/farmer issue, the people who refuse to drink Starbucks coffee or wear Nike shoes because of alleged violation of fair trade laws or labor laws will certainly not want to consume the rice from the farmer who beats up his wife. They will want to get it from more 'ethically appropriate' sources. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Pradeepan R pradeepanisonline@ wrote: This is completely ridiculous.If I tell you that the Rice that you eat, is coming from a piece of land, owned by a farmer who beats up his Wife would you stop eating ?? Would you be willing to make an effort to find out ??!!! we all know for a fact that we pollute the earth by driving...isn't that unethical towards our future generation ? :)) lets not bring ARR into unnecessary stuff. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, vivek iiivivekobero@ wrote: Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see,
[arr] Critics award tally: 'Slumdog' reigns
Critics award tally: 'Slumdog' reigns Dec 26, 2008, 10:00 AM | by Dave Karger Categories: Pre-Oscar Prizes Now that over 20 critics prizes and other pre-Oscar winners have been announced, from organizations well known (New York Film Critics Circle) and less so (the Alliance of Women Film Journalists), I thought I'd tally up all the award recipients so far to determine this year's critical favorites. Some categories (Best Director, Best Supporting Actor) have clear favorites, while others (Best Actress, Best Supporting Actress) are much tighter races, critically speaking. By far the two biggest winners? Slumdog Millionaire and Heath Ledger. Here's how things shake down. Best Picture Slumdog Millionaire (12) The Dark Knight (3) Milk (3) Wall-E (3) The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2) Frost/Nixon (1) Happy-Go-Lucky (1) Wendy and Lucy (1) Best Director Danny Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire (16) Gus Van Sant, Milk (2) Jonathan Demme, Rachel Getting Married (1) Ron Howard, Frost/Nixon (1) Mike Leigh, Happy-Go-Lucky (1) David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (1) Christopher Nolan, The Dark Knight (1) Andrew Stanton, Wall-E (1) Best Actor Sean Penn, Milk (12) Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler (11) Frank Langella, Frost/Nixon (2) Clint Eastwood, Gran Torino (1) Ricky Gervais, Ghost Town (1) Richard Jenkins, The Visitor (1) Best Actress Sally Hawkins, Happy-Go-Lucky (8) Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married (6) Kate Winslet, Revolutionary Road (4) Melissa Leo, Frozen River (3) Meryl Streep, Doubt (2) Angelina Jolie, Changeling (2) Michelle Williams, Wendy and Lucy (1) Best Supporting Actor Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight (21) Josh Brolin, Milk (2) Michael Shannon, Revolutionary Road (1) Best Supporting Actress Marisa Tomei, The Wrestler (7) Penélope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barcelona (6) Viola Davis, Doubt (5) Rosemarie DeWitt, Rachel Getting Married (4) Kate Winslet, The Reader (3) Taraji P. Henson, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (1) Best Original Screenplay Dustin Lance Black, Milk (4) Jenny Lumet, Rachel Getting Married (4) Tom McCarthy, The Visitor (2) Andrew Stanton Jim Reardon, Wall-E (2) Charlie Kaufman, Synecdoche, New York (1) Mike Leigh, Happy-Go-Lucky (1) Martin McDonagh, In Bruges (1) Nick Schenk, Gran Torino (1) Robert D. Siegel, The Wrestler (1) Best Adapted Screenplay Simon Beaufoy, Slumdog Millionaire (10) Peter Morgan, Frost/Nixon (5) Christopher Nolan Jonathan Nolan, The Dark Knight (1) Eric Roth, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (1) http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2008/12/critics-award-t.html
Re: [arr] Why no much talk abt Ghajini BGM
Hey come on guys , If you have clearly noticed the BGMs then you would say it was awesome, I Just watched the movie in Satyam cinemas , Even though i have seen the movie in tamil , It was still thrilling just because of the mindblowing BGMs . Karthik On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM, fani kalyan rythmdivine2...@yahoo.comwrote: also ..I personally feel that the BGM is not so impressive..The AR touch and thump is missing..maybe coz I expected too much or the sound system where I watched is bad or like for the songs..the BGM also takes time to grow on?!!!
Re: [arr] Re: Question on Ethics to ARR...
Your pak comparison does not make sense at all, IMO... How can the owner of the browsing center be blamed for the mail sent by his customer... Or the ISP for its customers' illegal access to copyrighted materials They are just providing tools... On 12/26/08, vivek iiivivekoberoi...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, ARR should not have involved with the project if he was aware that prior permission was not taken for remaking the movie. Yes, ARR should not rent out his studio to MDs who are blatantly and intentionally guilty of infringing on copyrights of other artists - international or domestic. well gomzy, going by your logic, pakistan can house thousands of terrorist camps and get away with it by just saying oh we just gave them a place to live and work. We are not responsible for what they do. Do you think it is acceptable? A guy distributing ghajini mp3s would say I am just giving but I am not asking anyone to take it. So, I am morally upright and did no wrong. The other guy would say, I am just taking because he is giving otherwise I would have bought the CD. So, I am pure.. you see, morals are subjective. oh yeah right! technically speaking, ARR might not have broken any law. but... laws exist for enforcement. morals exist for enlightenment. laws have to be obeyed. morals have to be practiced. Just because we love ARR, the man and his music, it should not blind our own judgement. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy™ gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: Now lets use your logic for something better. ARR's studio is given out on rent basis to various MDs. I wouldnt wanna name the MDs who use the studio. Now are we going to sue or question ARRs ethics if these MDs copy or rip off some guys music? (they are btw) Please stop catching anything related to ARR in every manner possible and holding that against him. On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:13 AM, ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni . sriramiye...@... wrote: What has AR got to do with it? His work is completely original, the basic story of GHAJINI is SURE to have been inspired from the H'wood flick, but the 'masala' is completely by the writer/director. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com arrahmanfans% 40yahoogroups.com, pradeepananth pradeepananth@ wrote: So Ghajini is out and looks like its all set to break all box office records. Aamir, the producers and everyone involved is going to rake in a lot of moolah. As far as I know, Murugadoss Co. did not quite pay Christopher Nolan, his brother Jonathan Nolan(original story) or the producers of Memento for the rights of the movie. Maybe the tamil ghajini didn't quite hit their radar but the Hindi one because of its high- profile nature will probably do and they might come after Murugadoss co. In any case, I am disgusted that these guys didn't quite go and acquire the rights first from the original writer/director/producers before ripping it off. If they don't have any qualms ripping off others' intellectual property, why should they expect their audience to not go for pirated DVDs and VCDs of their movie? Why do they appeal to them to not watch through 'illegal sources' when what they are doing is by no means legal? (I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that Ghajini will be deemed a case of plagiarism under most intellectual property laws) Question to ARR is even though he is not directly ripping off the story, he is certainly 'associated' with the movie and I wonder if he ought to have put a foot down and said that he would not want to be associated with a movie where the intellectual property rights of another creative artist are being violated. After all ARR doesn't appreciate people downloading his music through illegal sources and not paying for it. He knows how much its hurts an artiste. Folks with access to ARR - if you could get his stance on this issue, that would be awesome. Thoughts? -pradeep -- Sent from my very old 386 machine.
Re: [ARR] Sonu Nigam Interview on Rediff
Video link to Sonu Nigam's interview - http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/broadband/video/Interviews/qZIOpI63/3/Sonu-Nigam-s-Interview.html He says he got more applause from audience for his humming in Guzarish than he usually gets for a normal song. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Gomzy gomtesh.upad...@... wrote: http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2008/dec/22video1-sonu-sings-for-rediff.htm Excerpts *How did the industry people react to this change in you?* People, who wanted to work with me, were obviously disturbed by my unavailability. Others were rejoicing as they were getting more work. I don't have to worry about how people reacted. I need to worry about myself and my contribution to the industry. Honestly, when people hear too much of you, they stop appreciating your work. On the other hand, when they get less of you, they start missing you. For example, I just hummed a part in *Guzarish* from *Ghajini*http://www.rediff.com/movies/ghajini08.html. I haven't sung the song. But the kind of reviews I got just for my humming is amazing. And this is because they have not been hearing enough of me. If they had heard me through the songs of *Ghajini*, they wouldn't have spoken about my humming. *Is it true that you had sung Guzarish a long time ago?* Yes. I sang the song about two and a half years ago, with different lyrics. When they changed the lyrics and asked me to sing, I wasn't available. I was in New Jersey for my son's birth. So they called Javed Ali and I think he has done an awesome job. The song became his. But out of respect for me, A R Rahman kept the humming part intact. *Did that upset you?* No. If I was an insecure person, it would have. It was meant to be Javed's song, and so it is. Everybody has the right to earn their bread and butter. There is no point cribbing about something that was not meant for you. *What do you think went wrong with Yuvvraaj's music? Why, do you think, the film and music did not do well?* *Yuvvraaj* had great songs. My favourite was *Dost*. I wish I was given that song to sing. I sang three songs from the film. I think they were not promoted well. If they were, things would have been different. *Mastam Mastam* came out when the film released and since the film didn't do well, the song got lost. *Dil Ka Sikka* is out now, and the film is out of theatres. A lot depends on the fate of the film. If it is promoted well, it would have done well -- like *Nagada* from *Jab We Met*.
RE: [arr] Why no much talk abt Ghajini BGM
Hi, I watched the movie yesterday, in terms of bgs ghajini is not offering anything. Thats it. fani kalyan wrote: also ..I personally feel that the BGM is not so impressive.. The AR touch and thump is missing..maybe coz I expected too much or the sound system where I watched is bad or like for the songs..the BGM also takes time to grow on?!!! Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/