Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread crooner

The Stereovox cable is the other way around. It is terminated with true
75 ohm BNC connectors with optional lock-in RCA adapters. It was
designed by the same engineer that devised the famed Illuminati D60
cable.


-- 
crooner

Customized dual chassis Super Squeezebox
EAD DSP-7000 MKIII DAC with HDCD
VPI Scout with Benz Micro Glider M2
Audio Research PH3, SP16L and VS110
Vandersteen 2Ce signatures, 2W subwoofer.

crooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3379
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Active Speakers

2007-05-02 Thread Keith

Robin Bowes;197751 Wrote: 
 Keith wrote:
  I've been using a pair of Fostex PM04's in the kitchen for a year
 and
  they work fine. Each unit is bi-amped. I originally had a pair of
 JBL
  Control 1's with a Quad 306 (oh and an attenuator due to the
  sensitivity of the other half to loud music! - even 1 on the SB2 was
  too loud) but wanted to get rid of the amp as I had another use for
 it.
  I needed something small enough not to swallow up too much of the
  worktop but still sound OK in their own right. These met the bill
 being
  (approx) 180mm deep (The units are 170mm deep but there is a
 heat-sink
  on the back), 145mm wide and 220mm high (that's 7 x 5.75 x 8.75).
  They cost about £100.
  (The light coloured plinth at the bottom is just there in case
  something gets spilt on the worktop)
 
 Do you really have them that close together??? You're not too bothered
 about soundstage in the kitchen then? :)
 
 R.

Yep that close, anyway would you really want to listen to music in
detail with all those hard surfaces? The kitchen is a good size so and
the unit is only to provide background music/radio. The main listening
room and study have a better setups.

On the other hand I can always kneel in front of the speakers and place
my chin on the worktop... :o)


-- 
Keith

Keith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=460
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23115

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

Everyone is saying DRM is dead for music, and EMI is in crisis, and in
panic has decided maybe they are right and is now tyring to see if they
can sell some digital music after the failure of iTunes DRM.

But at the same time the industry knows it needs copy protection on
DVDs and consumers are happily buying HDCP TVs and every manufacturer
is selling them. Why music one thing and films another... that makes no
sense...

The herd thinking is often wrong...

* Suppose you created a format which was 24bit recordings so it is
better than cd quality..

* And suppose you embedded lots of text and images in the files so you
can see words and pics and documents and stories in a whole new
experience that goes far beyond todays mp3 files

* And suppose the files are playable on a variety of devices like
portable ipods and hi quality boxes like the transporter

Now suddenly you have something that consumers really want and there
are no files like it in the world and ripping Cd's can not compare

All of a sudden people will buy that. It's not like crappy iTunes DRM
that gives you worse quality that you can get from ripping a CD but
with restrictions...

OK DRM is not perfect and can be broken but that can be made hard and
dangerously illegal. A new high quality format creates a lot of digital
files which only exist in DRM standard and anyone who has them is
breaking the law... unlike CDs which can be legally scanned... you
could never have a file sharing web site with these files
unprotected...


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Rangdo

willyhoops;199037 Wrote: 
 But at the same time the industry knows it needs copy protection on DVDs
 and consumers are happily buying HDCP TVs and every manufacturer is
 selling them. Why music one thing and films another... that makes no
 sense...
 

I'd guess part of the DVD issue has been that until recently
downloading 4-9GB has been pretty much unfeasible for the majority and
dual-layer DVD+/-R prices are only now starting to drop to reasonable
prices, leaving the best option to-date being a re-compressed movie
with most features stripped to squeeze onto a 4GB disk.


-- 
Rangdo

GRONDA GRONDA

SB 2 [Stereovox XV2]  Benchmark DAC1 [NVA Soundpipe]  Cyrus Pre Xvs
[NVA Soundpipe]  Cyrus X-Power [Chord Rumour 4]  MA GR20

Rangdo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5238
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread MrStan

I think the HDDVD encryption point just goes to prove what has already
been said throughout this thread. Sections of the HDCD encryption have
already been broken before the product is hardly out of the box. Both
Blu-ray and HDDVD have been successfully copied which just goes to
prove that any form for copyright protection can be beaten if there is
enough demand.

CD sales are down for a couple of reasons.

1. We have now replaced most of the old Vinyl that we wished to replace
so we are not buying replacements.

2. The retail outlets have stopped selling anything that doesn't sell
instantly on mass so we are unable to go into a shop and browse-buy
anymore unless you live in a major city.

3. The larger recording companies are not willing to risk new material
and keep releasing old material at a premium price. That seems to be
the case with the classical genre and those smaller companies that do
take a risk seem to be surviving even  when charging at a premium
price.

Supply me with downloadable material in a lossless format and I will
buy as I suspect would many others. The market out is there, some
recording companies have discovered it without DRM but unfortunately
the haven't understood the lossless bit yet.


-- 
MrStan

MrStan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1771
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread AndyC_772

24 bit, art  graphics included, DRM and wide compatibility with
equipment... you've just described DVD-Audio, which failed. Nobody
bought it.

In any case, the market for such a format would be limited to those
people:
- who actually care about the higher resolution, which is a tiny number
of audiophiles, AND
- who don't care about the fact that it's encrypted, which I strongly
suspect rules out most of those.

Commercial suicide, in other words.

Have any figures ever been released, which show a sudden and permanent
drop in DVD sales following the release of DeCSS? It's an interesting
controlled experiment; DVDs went from being difficult or impossible to
copy, to being trivial to copy, almost overnight. Did the movie
industry ever actually back up their whining about it with any actual
figures?

Has it, perhaps, occurred to you that all the formats which are
commercially successful are also easy to copy - while SACD and
DVD-Audio (which are not easy to copy) are the ones which have been
failures?

Don't get me wrong - I'd [ay good money for 24-bit, audiophile quality
recordings - but only as long as they're of music that I'd have
actually bought anyway, and provided they're in an open,
non-proprietary, unencrypted format.


-- 
AndyC_772

AndyC_772's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10472
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Patrick Dixon

http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2068617,00.html


-- 
Patrick Dixon

www.at-tunes.co.uk

Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread krochat

Patrick Dixon;199052 Wrote: 
 http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2068617,00.html

And, despite what the article says, the album is already available for
download at http://www.thecrimea.net/download/tabid/62/Default.aspx

Kim


-- 
krochat

--
SB3 (+linear) - Big Ben - TacT RCS 2.2X - 2xS2150 - Vandersteen 3a
Signature + TacT W210

krochat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6579
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

and from that article (which i had alreay seen being a drm debate fan
and a prop trader concerned with share prices and trends):

--

Despite selling a respectable 35,000 copies of their debut album,
Tragedy Rocks, and making the top 40 with the single Lottery Winners On
Acid, the band were last year dropped by their record label, Warner
Music.

Like its major-label rivals, it [Warner] is struggling with the
structural changes to the record industry and, say critics, is
increasingly unable to invest in long-term artist development.

The experiment is being watched closely by the industry and other
artists struggling with the conundrum of how to make money at a time
when CD sales are collapsing and margins are decreasing...

so it's like Sun's Open Office. if you can't sell, you may as well give
it away for free adn hope it works out well somehow in the future...

--

that's hardly an argument for why drm is bad


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

well patrick, can i narrow this down... suppose for the purposes of
argument it did work... then don't you agree the world would be a
better place given the many points i have made?


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Patrick Dixon

willyhoops;199070 Wrote: 
 
 that's hardly an argument for why drm is badThe argument against DRM is 
 very simple - it doesn't work!

Which is why the music industry needs to re-invert itself with a new
business model.


-- 
Patrick Dixon

www.at-tunes.co.uk

Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread opaqueice

willyhoops;199072 Wrote: 
 well patrick, can i narrow this down... suppose for the purposes of
 argument it did work... then don't you agree the world would be a
 better place given the many points i have made?

Well, I'm not Patrick, but basically what you said was: suppose we take
everything about recorded music and make it better - higher resolution,
nice tags, etc. - and at the same time we take the DRM we have now and
make it much easier to use and less annoying.  Would that be better
than what we have now?  Obviously, yeah - but it's a total fantasy and
not very interesting.  

And it might not be better than eliminating DRM entirely.  That's what
you should compare this to - not our current system, which everyone
agrees is broken.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread Ray70

Hello, first post so be gentle. I am giving serious thought to buying a
Transporter (this will be my first Slim Devices purchase - jumping in
at the deep end). Partnering equipment will be Jeff Rowland Concentra
II amp, Focal Lab 1027be speakers. My (soon to be redundant?) CDP is a
Marantz SA11-S1 and I also have a much loved Linn LP12 TT. 

My PC is on it's last legs and I may buy a IMac to replace it. My
question is this: Is there a considerable difference in sound quality
between FLAC and Apple Lossless? I downloaded EAC / FLAC / Mediamonkey
during the weekend and experimented ripping and tagging files. Not
difficult to do, but ITunes seems so much easier, but is it at the
expense of quality?

Nice forum by the way. I'm heartened and encouraged to see fellow
audiophiles using a Transporter!


-- 
Ray70

Ray70's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11408
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

the point is that without drm (basically where we are now becuase itunes
drm is dead) music sales collapse, artists stop making music unless its
mega bucks pop t-shirt sales stuff, our economy shrinks a bit, and the
record companies won't release fancy new formats as digital files we
can copy to our devices. 

so life would clearly be better if drm was possible... and once you
start thinking that way you realise how well maybe with a bit of
lateral thinking and tough anti piracy legislation...


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread cliveb

willyhoops;199078 Wrote: 
 so life would clearly be better if drm was possible... 
You are a media industry stooge and I claim my prize.


-- 
cliveb

Performers - dozens of mixers and effects - clipped/hypercompressed
mastering - you think a few extra ps of jitter matters?

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread AndyC_772

Lol :) I was thinking much the same.

Thing is, though, if a technology were created that allowed me to use
digital information, freely, with any device I choose, with no
restrictions on how or where I use it, yet which also somehow prevented
other people from doing the same, I still wouldn't want it applied to my
music.

I'd want it applied to my credit card information.


-- 
AndyC_772

AndyC_772's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10472
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread tomjtx

Ray70;199074 Wrote: 
 Hello, first post so be gentle. I am giving serious thought to buying a
 Transporter (this will be my first Slim Devices purchase - jumping in
 at the deep end). Partnering equipment will be Jeff Rowland Concentra
 II amp, Focal Lab 1027be speakers. My (soon to be redundant?) CDP is a
 Marantz SA11-S1 and I also have a much loved Linn LP12 TT. 
 
 My PC is on it's last legs and I may buy a IMac to replace it. My
 question is this: Is there a considerable difference in sound quality
 between FLAC and Apple Lossless? I downloaded EAC / FLAC / Mediamonkey
 during the weekend and experimented ripping and tagging files. Not
 difficult to do, but ITunes seems so much easier, but is it at the
 expense of quality?
 
 Nice forum by the way. I'm heartened and encouraged to see fellow
 audiophiles using a Transporter!

I run my TP through a J Rowlad amp as well.

Make sure you use XLR out from TP as it sounds much better than RCA 
IMO,  YMMV :-)

Alac sounds great . No difference at all from flac.
But do go into server settings in the slim software and uncheck the box
that allows slim to convert alac to mp3. That might degrade the SQ.

I allow slim to convert alac to either flac or wav before it sends to
TP.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread servies

willyhoops;199078 Wrote: 
 the point is that without drm (basically where we are now becuase itunes
 drm is dead) music sales collapse, artists stop making music unless its
 mega bucks pop t-shirt sales stuff, our economy shrinks a bit, and the
 record companies won't release fancy new formats as digital files we
 can copy to our devices. 
 
 so life would clearly be better if drm was possible... and once you
 start thinking that way you realise how well maybe with a bit of
 lateral thinking and tough anti piracy legislation...

Geezz... I never thought that people could be influenced this much by
the propaganda of the RIAA...
Roughly seen, I bought about 350 titles when my age was between 20 and
30 (not much compared to a lot of other people but here in the
Netherlands we used to pay a lot more than in the USA). These days I
hardly buy a CD, in the last 5 years it's probably some 20 to 30
CD's...
Why? It has nothing to do with piracy, all the music I play with my
squeezebox, I have bought!
First, it's because I've bought quite a lot of DVD's. (that's money I
can't spend on CD's).
Second, I've spend a lot of money on photographic hardware (that's
money I can't spend on CD's).
Third, I redecorated my house partially. (that's money I can't spend on
CD's).
And last but not least: the music the big companies invest in is mostly
utter crap (IMO), 99.% of it should never have been released. And
DRM handicapped crap I will NEVER buy... I will decide how and where I
will play my music, that's not something the music companies need to
decide for me...


-- 
servies

servies's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9496
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Patrick Dixon

willyhoops;199078 Wrote: 
 the point is that without drm (basically where we are now becuase itunes
 drm is dead) music sales collapse, artists stop making music unless its
 mega bucks pop t-shirt sales stuff, our economy shrinks a bit, and the
 record companies won't release fancy new formats as digital files we
 can copy to our devices. 
 
 so life would clearly be better if drm was possible... and once you
 start thinking that way you realise how well maybe with a bit of
 lateral thinking and tough anti piracy legislation...

Typewriter sales collapsed when someone invented the word processor,
but the smart Typewriter companies evolved and the others went out of
business.  I don't think the economy shrunk though.

DRM is the music industry's attempt to control the market, but what
they don't seem to have got, is it's the customers who actually control
it.  They need to move on, give the customer what he or she is actually
prepared to buy, and then they will continue making money.  And if
their margins get slimmer as a result, they'll just have to tighten
their belts.  Welcome to the real world.


-- 
Patrick Dixon

www.at-tunes.co.uk

Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread mrfantasy

Isn't SACD already a high-quality, DRM-crippled, audio format?  That's
doing really well, isn't it? ;-) 

This is a silly debate if only that iTunes not only is selling DRM-free
music, but is doing it at a higher price and a higher bitrate.  The
consumer is getting what they want.


-- 
mrfantasy

--Mike

mrfantasy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1127
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

For the record i am not a media company stooge but i do work in finance
and have a more sensible view of the world that most people who think
big business is all evil etc (except of course the companies they work
for or have invested in), and drm can't be stopped even though we know,
for example, that the fbi can stop porn on the net and the us government
have stopped online gambling.

Most of all i am disgusted at how much potential there is in the
squeezebox and yet how dreadful the reality is. i spent three weeks
writing a tagging program powerful enough for my needs and i am buying
a $700 robotic arm to scan my cd collection. my girlfriend keeps says
William why are you doing all this stuff... Obviously they are going
to come up with a better way. I keep saying to her not if the general
public don't wake up to the importance of drm.

I know paying for music will be a bit of a bummer but if we start
buying it again the quality will go up and the price will go down so it
will be worth it!


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

Haha No I am really serious... 

The program I wrote to tag which took three weeks to write is here:

www.exceltagger.com

I figured i may as well make it freeware :-)

And here is the robotic arm:

http://www.mfdigital.com/baxter.html

Sad but true...


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread opaqueice

willyhoops;199078 Wrote: 
 the point is that without drm (basically where we are now becuase itunes
 drm is dead) music sales collapse, artists stop making music unless its
 mega bucks pop t-shirt sales stuff, our economy shrinks a bit, and the
 record companies won't release fancy new formats as digital files we
 can copy to our devices. 

Music sales collapse?  Yeah, because music is free.  Certainly there
will still be ways to make money distributing it, but the business
model will change greatly, that's for sure.  

Artists stop making money?  Sorry?  What world are you living in?  I
know several pro musicians well and am acquainted with quite a few
more, including some reasonably successful ones and one very successful
one, and only that last one makes a significant portion of his income
from record sales.  So a few of the most successful musicians would
have less money - balanced against everyone else in the country having
free or cheap access to all the music they want.  My expectation is
there would be an explosion in the music scene as all these artificial
controls were relaxed - people could sample as they wanted, explore new
music without a cost barrier, there'd be more live shows, and less hype
by record companies promoting the flavor-of-the-month crappy pop.

Fancy new formats?  I couldn't care less - I want good music, not 
digital formats.  And cutting parasitic companies out of the market is
regarded as a good thing by most economists, actually.

 
 so life would clearly be better if drm was possible... and once you
 start thinking that way you realise how well maybe with a bit of
 lateral thinking and tough anti piracy legislation...

Just think about that for a while.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread haunyack

willyhoops;199094 Wrote: 
 For the record i am not a media company stooge but i do work in finance
 and have a more sensible view of the world that most people who think
 big business is all evil etc (except of course the companies they work
 for or have invested in), and drm can't be stopped even though we know,
 for example, that the fbi can stop child porn on the net and the us
 government have stopped online gambling.
 
 Most of all i am disgusted at how much potential there is in the
 squeezebox and yet how dreadful the reality is. i spent three weeks
 writing a tagging program powerful enough for my needs and i am buying
 a $700 robotic arm to scan my cd collection. my girlfriend keeps says
 William why are you doing all this stuff... Obviously they are going
 to come up with a better way. I keep saying to her not if the general
 public don't wake up to the importance of drm.
 
 I know paying for music will be a bit of a bummer but if we start
 buying it again the quality will go up and the price will go down so it
 will be worth it!
 
 And just so you know I don't work for the RIAA I will happily admit
 that after scanning my cds i give them to friends and I regularly rip
 my friends CDs and suggest they buy a squeezbox and take a complete
 copy of my collection. It's a nightmare for the industry but until the
 fools build a decent DRM and lock it down with laws we may as well all
 join the party. How about an accurate rip + flac sharing web site by
 the way? Maybe one that focuses on Classical? Lets do it in style...
 (Joke)


oops...wrong planet.
Light gravity + heavy water.

.


-- 
haunyack

Transporter - BK Reference 200.2 - Vandersteen 3A Signature.
Fridgidare - Mirror Pond pale ale - easy chair w/remote - irritated
neighbors.

haunyack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9721
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread mswlogo

crooner;199024 Wrote: 
 The Stereovox cable is the other way around. It is terminated with true
 75 ohm BNC connectors with optional lock-in RCA adapters. It was
 designed by the same engineer that devised the famed Illuminati D60
 cable.

That's exactly what we are talking about. Waste of money unless you
have a true BNC requirement on least one end (Source or DAC).


-- 
mswlogo

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread Anne

mswlogo;199113 Wrote: 
 That's exactly what we are talking about. Waste of money unless you have
 a true BNC requirement on least one end (Source or DAC).

Well, then its Toslink for me then because the Bryston dac do not have
bnc either


-- 
Anne

Bryston B-100 SST, Squeezebox 3, Martin Logan Aeon I.

Anne's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread ErikM

Best way to reduce jitter and improve sound.. Monarchy 48/96 DIP
upsamper... Cheap and good!


-- 
ErikM

ErikM's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7576
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread EFP

willyhoops;199094 Wrote: 
 I know paying for music will be a bit of a bummer but if we start buying
 it again the quality will go up and the price will go down so it will be
 worth it!

mr. finance, it doesn't work that way
if you paid for it, why would anybody bother improving the quality or
lowering the price?
because it's obviously selling fine the way it is if you already bought
it.


-- 
EFP

EFP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6651
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread adamslim

willyhoops;199037 Wrote: 
 * Suppose you created a format which was 24bit recordings so it is
 better than cd quality..
 
 * And suppose you embedded lots of text and images in the files so you
 can see words and pics and documents and stories in a whole new
 experience that goes far beyond todays mp3 files
 
 * And suppose the files are playable on a variety of devices like
 portable ipods and hi quality boxes like the transporters
 
 * And suppose those files are backed up for you so you can never loose
 them and any device you buy in the future can be compatible with them
 
 * And suppose those files are there for you at any compression rate you
 like - so you can put high quality ones in the transporter and low
 quality ones in the ipod all effortlessly
 
 * And those files are just simple .zip like packs containing multiple
 tracks that you load and never need to worry about which directory they
 are in etc and even my mother can get into hard drive music playback
 
 Now suddenly you have something that consumers really want and there
 are no files like it in the world and ripping Cd's can not compare

I think John Lennon has the copyright on that song :)


-- 
adamslim

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have
others

http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/
'Last.fm group: people who don't listen to any of last.fm's top
artists'
(http://www.last.fm/group/People+who+don%27t+listen+to+any+of+last.fm%27s+top+artists)

adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread Heuer

No difference in quality between ALAC and FLAC but you will find most
people favour FLAC because it is non-proprietary code unlike Apple's.

Lots of user support and development going on with FLAC as well, hence
the following. Choose carefully as once you have ripped in one format
it is a pain to change. I started out ripping my CD's to ALAC as I
thought the iTunes interface was better but eventually succumbed from
the weight of opinion and re-did everything in FLAC, and have not
regretted it. All my FLAC music files can be converted to MP3 to use on
my iPod using foobar2000 or batch processed using the FLAC2MP3 script.
As the SB3 does on the fly FLAC decoding it will also use less
bandwidth.

EAC is supposed to produce more accurate CD rips, or at least tell you
if there are deficiencies whilst iTunes will go blindly on.

If you are thinking of trading music FLAC is the defacto lossless
standard.

So a case of an easy Apple life or follow the 'in-crowd' for a bit of
fun!


-- 
Heuer

Heuer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2543
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread willyhoops

well i like a good debate but this was not much fun. i wrote up my
thoughts on the subject and will email to various enlightened people to
see if i am really as mad as you all think. i have an academic friend
who contributed to the mp4 standard and is on the patent pool.. if he
sends me a great write up i will post here so you know you are all
loosers :-) and if he says i am mad you will hear no more :-)

http://www.willyhoops.com/AudioDRM.htm


-- 
willyhoops

willyhoops's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10563
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Phil Leigh

In the meantime, some enlightened companies are selling non-DRM HQ
files...

If you can point me at a successful business model that relied on
constraining the rights of innocent people to enjoy the fruits of their
hard work by assuming they are criminals with no evidence then I'd be
very interested.

Imagine the uproar if Ford (say) had a law passed in their favour so
that it was illegal to fit 3rd-party parts
or, if a camera manufacturer claimed proprietary rights over any image
you captured with their hardware...
or, if some buffoon tried to stop you copying your CD onto another
media so you could enjoy your legally acquired music in a different
context...oops!


-- 
Phil Leigh

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread Timothy Stockman

The point of FLAC and Apple lossless is that they are LOSSLESS, so there
is no difference in the bits presented to the DAC regardless of whether
it is stored as FLAC, ALAC, or uncompressed WAV.  As has been pointed
out iTunes may not be the best way to rip your CD collection.  I have
been very happy with EAC and a Plextor PX-230A drive.  There have been
a couple discs that didn't work in the Plextor, not because there was
any visible damage, but I also have a Teac DV-516GA DVD drive, which
read the discs the Plextor would not with no problem.  So it appears
that the best situation is to try a second, different type of drive for
stubborn discs.


-- 
Timothy Stockman

Timothy Stockman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8867
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread snarlydwarf

willyhoops;199124 Wrote: 
 well i like a good debate but this was not much fun. i wrote up my
 thoughts on the subject and will email to various enlightened people to
 see if i am really as mad as you all think. i have an academic friend
 who contributed to the mp4 standard and is on the patent pool.. if he
 sends me a great write up i will post here so you know you are all
 loosers :-) and if he says i am mad you will hear no more :-)

So because he contributed to a codec... that makes him an expert in
public key encryption, key management, economics, contract law,
international law and marketing?  (Since all of those and more would be
needed.)

You don't need to be an expert in Key Management to see the problem:
look at how fast DVD, HD-DVD and BluRay have been cracked.  You don't
need to be an expert in marketing to know that oh, just buy a new PC
with a SIM slot!  and a new CD player for your car!  And a new
portable!  etc.. would be a very hard sell for consumers.  Not to
mention the odds of getting all the hardware vendors to agree on a
Single Standard (just whose standard?  and how much will royalty
payments be?), etc.

Perhaps you should put your money where your mouth is and stop pirating
yourself?  I pay for my music, I don't see why you can't.  Everyone
else does it is not an excuse.


-- 
snarlydwarf

snarlydwarf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1179
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread 325xi

opaqueice;198986 Wrote: 
 In fairness, the requirements for sending an S/PDIF signal are rather
 different than for an analogue audio signal.  As I've learned on this
 forum, you have to remember that even GHz frequency components might be
 relevant in S/PDIF transmission (as filtering them will round off
 transitions and induce jitter).  That brings even relatively short
 cables into the transmission line regime, whereas for analogue audio
 that's not the case at all.
 
 Of course that doesn't imply that any of this will make an audible
 difference - I suspect not - but one can over-engineer.

Now that's interesting... So we're on the way back to over-everything
SPDIF cables?


-- 
325xi

325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread 325xi

AndyC_772;198931 Wrote: 
 So... measurements aren't everything. That's not news - just look at the
 specs of any valve amp.
 
 The first rule of choosing hi-fi is to trust your own ears. How the
 product works, and what measurements can be made from it, may be of
 academic interest to potential buyers - but it's only the design
 engineer that really needs to know about them.

I can't kill my inner engineer! And this is one of the reasons I
don't use any valve amps. ;)

No, really, measurements are just measurements, they are not good or
bad. They can only be good or bad for a particular application. If they
are bad for this application, but the device sounds good, then either
I'm deaf, or requirements for this application are incorrect. I suspect
the second options is closer to reality, but as long as we don't have
any better requirements for audio gear I can't sleep well, knowing that
my DAC measures baaad...


-- 
325xi

325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread sc53

I have been using Apple Lossless since it came out and I find iTunes
very easy to use and manage my music. I am not worried about its being
proprietary, Apple is very likely to be here longer than I will be. I
find all the extra steps for FLAC time consuming whereas with iTunes I
just select my preferences and settings and do nothing more but put a
disk in my CDR drive. I like iTunes for playlists and compilations. The
music through my SB3 and Electrocompaniet DAC sounds identical to that
through my Linn Unidisk 2.1 and Marantz SA-1.


-- 
sc53

sc53's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8690
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread slimkid

sorry, just couldn't resist, but:

Phil Leigh;199129 Wrote: 
 If you can point me at a successful business model that relied on
 constraining the rights of innocent people to enjoy the fruits of their
 hard work by assuming they are criminals with no evidence then I'd be
 very interested.

Ever heard of pick_your_favorite_country government. :)

K


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread nicketynick

Can you provide any back-up to this statement:

CD sales are down 20% year on year and growing online digital file
sales are very much failing to make up the gap

I have a few problems with it:

1. Unit of measurement - if you are talking dollars, I don't think it
is a relevant statement. Sure, the big guys aren't making their gross
(I mean indecent) revenues  profits, but I believe (IMO) there is a
far more important redistribution of dollars to artists who are not
abused by the big guys. So far, win-win (except for shareholders, but I
wouldn't invest in them any more than I would invest in tobacco
merchants)

2. If you are talking 'songs', I have a very hard time believing that
online digital music has not resulted in a far larger quantity of
'songs' being distributed (purchased) than what were distributed on CD
alone.

In the end, the labels are going to have to accept (and EMI has begun)
that the old business model is dead, and a new one that hopefully
better distributes the wealth to the artists will rise from the ashes!


-- 
nicketynick

Wireless SB3, Denon DRA-F101, Mission M31 loudspeakers
WinXP SP2 Slimserver, SMC WBR14g router
http://www.last.fm/user/nicketynick/

nicketynick's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1511
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread ErikM

CD sales have dropped because of PRICE.. If all new cd releases where
say $7.99 instead of $14-$15. people would buy more.. Hard to justify
$15. when the average consumer can download an MP3 copy for $9.99 from
the comfort of their computer.. But price Cd's cheap and I believe that
folks would buy a lot of new and different music... In consumer land
price drives everything.


-- 
ErikM

ErikM's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7576
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread michel

Recently iTunes deleted 10% of my .m4a library without any reason to do
so.
Thumbs up for FLAC!


-- 
michel

michel's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4393
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread jeffmeh

The other ridiculous notion posted here is that the force of law will
prohibit people from circumventing DRM.

Just like gun laws prevent people from obtaining guns, alcohol
prohibition prevented people from drinking, and drug laws prevent
people from using drugs, right?

Never in human history has prohibition worked where there is both a
desire and an opportunity to circumvent it.


-- 
jeffmeh

jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread adamslim

sc53;199144 Wrote: 
 Apple is very likely to be here longer than I will be.

Really?  Even if they are, are they going to continue to support their
products when the next big thing comes along?  Will you end up having
to buy an apple.tv, apple.house and get an apple.wife to get it all to
work?

I prefer the notion of small enterprise and free software, so use FLAC.
It's also much better to use (MP3Tag and) multiple tag fields, which
Apple does not do.  As soon as your library really grows, you may find
iTunes lacking - I did.  Combine that with the knowledge that you are
-really- in control, and the decision is easy.  Oh and Rockbox on the
iPod :)

Adam


-- 
adamslim

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have
others

http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/
'Last.fm group: people who don't listen to any of last.fm's top
artists'
(http://www.last.fm/group/People+who+don%27t+listen+to+any+of+last.fm%27s+top+artists)

adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Skunk

jeffmeh;199162 Wrote: 
 
 Just like gun laws prevent people from obtaining guns, alcohol
 prohibition prevented people from drinking, and drug laws prevent
 people from using drugs, right?
 
 Never in human history has prohibition worked where there is both a
 desire and an opportunity to circumvent it.

Your comments reminded me of 'THIS MODERN WORLD', the comic strip, from
last week: [4/27/07*]


Code:


  ___
  |   |
  | THERE ARE LAWS AGAINST RAPE, MURDER, AND KIDNAPPING-- |
  |  _|
  | /  
  |/
  __
  |  |
  | AND YET THERE ARE *-STILL-* RAPES, MURDERS, AND KIDNAPPINGS! |
  |_   __|
  \ |
  \|
  
  __
  |  |
  | CLEARLY THE *ONLY* RATIONAL RESPONSE   |
  |__|
  |   |
  |   |_
  |  |
  | IS TO *ELIMINATE* THOSE LAWS -*ENTIRELY!*- |
  |  |
  | /
  |/
  * http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=22267
  
  
  
  
  



-- 
Skunk

Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2685
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Phil Leigh

jeffmeh;199162 Wrote: 
 The other ridiculous notion posted here is that the force of law will
 prohibit people from circumventing DRM.
 
 Just like gun laws prevent people from obtaining guns, alcohol
 prohibition prevented people from drinking, and drug laws prevent
 people from using drugs, right?
 
 Never in human history has prohibition worked where there is both a
 desire and an opportunity to circumvent it.

yes - right on the money!


-- 
Phil Leigh

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Phil Leigh

slimkid;199145 Wrote: 
 sorry, just couldn't resist, but:
 
 
 
 Ever heard of pick_your_favorite_country government. :)
 
 K
That is a political model, not a business one!


-- 
Phil Leigh

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread EFP

Phil Leigh;199176 Wrote: 
 That is a political model, not a business one!


the only difference is that if you want to buy a competitor's product
then you have to move to where it's being sold; they don't deliver.

unless they have a really strong interest in selling you their special
brand because maybe you know something that could be embarrassing for
the board of directors, then you might get a visit from their sales
team and make you the one being delivered.


-- 
EFP

EFP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6651
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I ripped using the laptop. Hang Me?

2007-05-02 Thread Actuary

Hello.
first time, long time.

consider me 2 months past ignorant of even knowing stuff like sb
existed.  I'm sortive old and sortive oblivious.  Furthermore, I had
been using my car stereo as the source of hi-fi enjoyment.

When I bought a laptop, we asked the fella how can we hook this up to
our home stereo  He suggested using a y-adapter and headphone out -
Receiver.  Uh, isn't that going to sound pretty bad, with the amplified
signal from the Headphone jack?
Nah, it'll sound great.  Guy at radio shack said the same.   Well,
there was lots of hum.  Was it groud loop?  I don't know.  But I ran on
battery only to test, and still there.

So anyway, you'd be surprised how few normal people even realize this
sb and other products like it exist.  I was clued in by an associate,
after asking lots of folks if there was an alternative and trying to
search the interweb, apparently with poor key word choices.

Ok, back to post.
So, not knowing better 3 months ago, I ripped my cds (wma lossless)
using the Compaq Laptop cd drive.  

Here's my question:
Pretend I have good music-ears, and tell me what I should listen for,
in order to determine a degraded version, due to using a sub-optimal
drive for ripping.  (if anything)

My Home equipment is very very average.  Having spent 10k on the car
stereo 7 yrs ago, I felt, at least for now, that a modest home theatre
would be fine. 
Maybe with cheap speakers, I won't tell a difference from using a
laptop to burn?

I only burn certain tracks
If it's worth it, I'd reburn (and probably use FLAC, although the
current wma is cool, even w/o full remote fuctionality)


thank you for reading this and for your help.


***

ooops,  I may have posted in the wrong forum.
I see there is a rip forum.
Maybe some Mod will move this for me?
Until then, one of you Audiophiles can addrees the nuances!


-- 
Actuary

Actuary's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11391
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34963

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I ripped using the laptop. Hang Me?

2007-05-02 Thread SuperQ

Actuary;199182 Wrote: 
 Hello.
 first time, long time.
 
 consider me 2 months past ignorant of even knowing stuff like sb
 existed.  I'm sortive old and sortive oblivious.  Furthermore, I had
 been using my car stereo as the source of hi-fi enjoyment.
 
 When I bought a laptop, we asked the fella how can we hook this up to
 our home stereo  He suggested using a y-adapter and headphone out -
 Receiver.  Uh, isn't that going to sound pretty bad, with the amplified
 signal from the Headphone jack?
 Nah, it'll sound great.  Guy at radio shack said the same.   Well,
 there was lots of hum.  Was it groud loop?  I don't know.  But I ran on
 battery only to test, and still there.
 
 So anyway, you'd be surprised how few normal people even realize this
 sb and other products like it exist.  I was clued in by an associate,
 after asking lots of folks if there was an alternative and trying to
 search the interweb, apparently with poor key word choices.
 
 Ok, back to post.
 So, not knowing better 3 months ago, I ripped my cds (wma lossless)
 using the Compaq Laptop cd drive.  
 
 Here's my question:
 Pretend I have good music-ears, and tell me what I should listen for,
 in order to determine a degraded version, due to using a sub-optimal
 drive for ripping.  (if anything)
 
 My Home equipment is very very average.  Having spent 10k on the car
 stereo 7 yrs ago, I felt, at least for now, that a modest home theatre
 would be fine. 
 Maybe with cheap speakers, I won't tell a difference from using a
 laptop to burn?
 
 I only burn certain tracks
 If it's worth it, I'd reburn (and probably use FLAC, although the
 current wma is cool, even w/o full remote fuctionality)
 
 
 thank you for reading this and for your help.
 
 
 ***
 
 ooops,  I may have posted in the wrong forum.
 I see there is a rip forum.
 Maybe some Mod will move this for me?
 Until then, one of you Audiophiles can addrees the nuances!

Laptop drives are just fine for ripping.. what matters is using a
secure ripper like cdparanoia (linux), EAC (windows)


-- 
SuperQ

SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34963

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Flac or Apple Lossless?

2007-05-02 Thread mftech

The choice is simple, FLAC is simply more flexible than ALAC.
From Flac you could go back to WAV, AIFF, and to CD
From Flac you could go to MP3 
Flac support 24 Bits, Multichannel, etc...
Flac is supported on Windows, Linux, MacOS...
Flac is easy to broadcast (ex:Squeezebox)

For me Flac is simply the best invention for audio after 
the Compact Cassette and the Compact Disc, and best of all it's robust
and free.

Long life to Flac.


-- 
mftech

Tête à FLAC

mftech's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1586
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34953

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I ripped using the laptop. Hang Me?

2007-05-02 Thread jdbaker

I ripped most of my 620 cds using Itunes on a laptop while I worked away
on my pc. It was very convenient. I ripped to apple lossless files and
they seem fine except for The Best of Van Morrison, a CD that was in
the hands of my kids for months and is now not in the best of
condition. It does not play worth a damn. If its not the dogs its the
kids.


-- 
jdbaker

jdbaker's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8531
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34963

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I ripped using the laptop. Hang Me?

2007-05-02 Thread DCtoDaylight

It's been my experience, that CD ripping problems, with most modern
hardware, are more often macro rather than micro...  In other words,
with if you aren't experiencing skipping or muting, you've probably
ripped without problems.  

Tools like EAC were initially developed to overcome the serious
hardware problems of the day, and many of us continue to use it because
we've been burned in the past and are paranoid!  If you're worried about
quality, and don't mind paying the price (of slower ripping speed) It's
still one of the best.

As always, your mileage may vary!
Dave


-- 
DCtoDaylight

DCtoDaylight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7284
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34963

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Pale Blue Ego

willyhoops;199037 Wrote: 
 
 * Suppose you created a format which was 24bit recordings so it is
 better than cd quality..
 
 * And suppose you embedded lots of text and images in the files so you
 can see words and pics and documents and stories in a whole new
 experience that goes far beyond todays mp3 files
 
 * And suppose the files are playable on a variety of devices like
 portable ipods and hi quality boxes like the transporters
 
 * And suppose those files are backed up for you so you can never loose
 them and any device you buy in the future can be compatible with them
 
 * And suppose those files are there for you at any compression rate you
 like - so you can put high quality ones in the transporter and low
 quality ones in the ipod all effortlessly
 
 * And those files are just simple .zip like packs containing multiple
 tracks that you load and never need to worry about which directory they
 are in etc and even my mother can get into hard drive music playback

How would this work, exactly?  It sounds like all devices, hardware and
software, now and in the future, would have to license the codec and DRM
scheme for this super wonderful format.  One company would have complete
control over the whole recording, distribution, and playback chain.  If
they decided to charge $20 per song, drop the tags and lyrics, and
reduce the sound quality, what recourse would consumers have?  If they
control the DRM, they can change the terms of the contract any time
they want.  And what happens when the DRM is cracked?  Throw everything
away and start over?  And what about the analog hole?  Couldn't you just
record it to an open format by digitizing the analog output or using a
microphone?  And what about artists or hardware makers who refused to
play along?  Jail them?  What about music from other countries?  Our
laws don't apply there.

It's a nice pipe dream - now put down the pipe and think about the
reality.


-- 
Pale Blue Ego

Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread mswlogo

ErikM;199115 Wrote: 
 Best way to reduce jitter and improve sound.. Monarchy 48/96 DIP
 upsamper... Cheap and good!

Resampling to 44.1khz to 48khz is a bad idea. If it supported 88.2Khz
is fine but unfortunately Slim Devices doesn't support 88.2Khz.
Upsampling to 96khz is useless on SqueezeBox 3 since it would down
sample back 48Khz.

In fact people go to great lengths to get their computers to NOT
resample 44.1Khz CD's to 48khz on their SPDIF capable sound cards.

Sorry but this would do more harm than good, really bad idea.


-- 
mswlogo

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What mods on SB3 REALLY make a difference in reducing jitter?

2007-05-02 Thread mswlogo

Anne;199114 Wrote: 
 Well, then its Toslink for me then because the Bryston dac do not have
 bnc either

There is a strong bias by audiophiles that Coax (RCA) is better than
TosLink. I wouldn't avoid RCA 75ohm Coax just because there is a debate
over BNC vs RCA connectors. My understanding is that RCA connectors are
fine at the speeds and distances SPDIF runs.


-- 
mswlogo

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34749

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I ripped using the laptop. Hang Me?

2007-05-02 Thread mswlogo

Laptop drive is fine.

But you might want to read up on Flac, EAC, Accurate Rip and
DBPoweramp.


-- 
mswlogo

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34963

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread slimkid

Phil Leigh;199176 Wrote: 
 That is a political model, not a business one!

And the difference is? You must be very young :), otherwise you would
have realised that the only reason man does anything is money (which is
later used to buy two most important goods - power and women) :0 :) :)


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DRM lessons from the Squeezebox

2007-05-02 Thread Pat Farrell
slimkid wrote:
  the only reason man does anything is money (which is
 later used to buy two most important goods - power and women) :0 :) :)

Actually, you can argue that Power and Money are isomorphic.
With power you can get money and women.
With money, you can get power and women.

The point of men, of course, is to get women.

The rest, including audiophile gear, is just a way to keep score along 
the way to the important stuff.

Too bad we men are clueless, the women pick us, not the way we claim and 
think.

Back on topic for at least this forum, my measure of a stereo is how it
does solo female voices.

That, and solo acoustic guitar are easy metrics for my ears.

These are much harder to reproduce faithfully than say Led Zepplin at 11.


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles