Re: Threads BB Web - Reworked
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:02:50PM +0100, ray@crytek wrote: > I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've > removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also > removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the > style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand column > and a number of small changes > > This was just a quick re-work and I'll make it XHTML standard if people > want to use it (or someone else can if they like) > > I've tested on w3m, IE6 (win2k) and Mozilla (win2k). This is really Thread's > design cut back, thats all > > Oh yer, the URL :] > http://www.planetquake.com/lvl/blackbox/ > > threads original ca be found here; > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/ Opera 6 (Linux) renders both designs so that the right edge of the box(es) o' links on the left side of the page is bang up flush against the text on the right of the page. It is quite unlovely. IE6 (Win2k/VMware), I notice, renders them both nicely with a space between the right edge of the box and the text. (Suggested fix: Simply insert between the two adjacent cells that contain the box(es) and the text.) FWIW, my preferences lean strongly toward the cleaner one-box design. Chris Menzel
Re: Threads BB Web - Reworked
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, mattias/spikboll wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:02:50 +0100 "ray@crytek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've > > removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've > also > > removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up > the > > style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand > column > > and a number of small changes > > > > Ohhh, I like this! This is where my vote goes. Count me in on this one (Because we all know my vote matters...), --gile -- W31... W95... W98... W2000... BOOM! You sunk my Billy ship!
Re: Threads BB Web - Reworked
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:02:50 +0100 "ray@crytek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've > removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also > removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the > style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand column > and a number of small changes > Ohhh, I like this! This is where my vote goes. -- mattias östergren | /"\ compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign gävle, sweden| X No HTML in e-mail http://spikboll.net | / \
Re: Blackbox Graphics in General
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:42:37 +0100 J.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We all know that Blackbox is wrapped around the fact that it's highly > minimalistic. This is good. Minimalism is the way every Open Source > identity should follow. Yet, why should minimalism mean bad design? Even > though Blackbox is as easy and light like a feather, it doesn't mean that > the graphics should make one bounce off the land of Blackbox just because > there's a better-looking option. These days, design is everything. And in > addition to having Blackbox functioning as light-weight desktop system, > which it does without question, everyone should focus more on getting the > light-weight graphics to look as if it was a graphical replacement of sex > invented in year 4000. Nawamean? =) > Well, I've never been more turned on by a windowmanager than by blackbox. Minimal frames and handles, nice readable labels, soft colours and this baby is hot! ;) -- mattias östergren | /"\ compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign gävle, sweden| X No HTML in e-mail http://spikboll.net | / \
Re: Possible Spin-Lock with 0.61.2pre4
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:06:49PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > Recently installed 0.61.2pre4 on my home workstation. Everything seemed > fine 'til just a short while ago. > > I had a few rxvt (v 2.7.6) sessions open along with gkrellm (v1.2.2) and > Evolution (v1.0) and esd (v 0.2.22). I noticed that new mail had > arrived and went to filter my INBOX. That's when I noticed that none of > the applications where responding. The mouse would move without a > hitch, but nothing would respond. I couldn't change to another virtual > terminal and I couldn't kill X (via CTRL-ALT-BKSPCE). I was however > able to remote into the system from my laptop. From the remote session > I noticed that X was taking nearly 100% of the CPU time. I tried > killing the process by sending a SIGTERM, SIGSEGV, and SIGKILL. None of > these worked. I then force a switch to runlevel 3 via 'init 3' and the > X session died. I was then able to switch back to runlevel 5 via 'init > 5' and everything seems to be working again. > > Are there any steps that I could take to provide more useful tracking > information if this happens again? Are you running a multi-processor system? xOr -- I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. msg04790/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bbkeys questions/comments
=:D
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 17:07, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
> > Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
> > "windows". =:)
>
> As usual, you and xOr rock. Thanks for the advice.
>
> Jamin W. Collins
>
--
%<--%<
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
Re: BB Feature
Actually, with the soon-to-be-released-but-currently-available-via-CVS
0.8.4 version of bbkeys, this is a separate keybinding. So, you can
have for NextWindow and for
NextWindowAllWorkspaces. This has been removed from the bbkeys.bb
config file that xOr mentioned below in version 0.8.4.
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 16:45, xOr wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:12:39AM +0100, Mark Weinem wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, xOr wrote:
> >
> > > You can set up bbkeys to show the windows on all workspaces in its
> > > list. So then when you hit alt-tab (or whatever you want) and get a
> > > list of all windows and just release th emodifier key (alt in this
> > > case) to switch to the window of your choice.
> >
> > How do i set this up? I only get a menu that shows the windows of the
> > *current* workspace. If i change to an empty workspace there's no menu
> > available.
> >
> > FreeBSD 4.4 + XFree86 3.3.6
> > blackbox 0.61.1 (ports)
> > bbkeys 0.8.3(ports)
>
> in your ~/.bbtools/bbkeys.bb or /usr/share/bbtools/bbkeys.bb
>
> ! set this to true to allow stacked cycling to go to any window on any
> ! workspace. all of the windows will appear in the menu if it is being shown.
> !bbkeys.menu.showAllWorkspaces: True
>
> xOr
> --
> I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way.
--
%<--%<
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
Re: bbkeys questions/comments
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote: > Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for > "windows". =:) As usual, you and xOr rock. Thanks for the advice. Jamin W. Collins
Re: bbkeys questions/comments
Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
"windows". =:)
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote:
> > > The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your
> > > keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString gives 1 characters:
> > > "f"), etc. in your ~/.bbkeysrc as shown in the README.
> >
> > That's what I tried, but I kept getting "XLookupString gives 0
> > characters: ""). I went back to try it again after getting your message,
> > and noticed that right after the keycode there's a bit that reads
> > "(keysym 0xffe7, SunFront)" (this is also how xev treats
> > Mod/CTRL/Shift). D'oh! I put "SunFront" as the KeyToGrab in bbkeysrc and
> > everything's working fine.
>
> Since we're talking about key-bindings, how would I go about using keys
> that xev displays no character or keysym for? All the "windows" keys on
> my keyboard return only a differing keycode. There is no keysym for
> them and certainly no character. On a few other keyboards, I have extra
> buttons that likewise don't return keysyms or characters.
>
> Any ideas, or are they just dead keys?
>
> Jamin W. Collins
>
--
%<--%<
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
Re: BB Feature
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:12:39AM +0100, Mark Weinem wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, xOr wrote: > > > You can set up bbkeys to show the windows on all workspaces in its > > list. So then when you hit alt-tab (or whatever you want) and get a > > list of all windows and just release th emodifier key (alt in this > > case) to switch to the window of your choice. > > How do i set this up? I only get a menu that shows the windows of the > *current* workspace. If i change to an empty workspace there's no menu > available. > > FreeBSD 4.4 + XFree86 3.3.6 > blackbox 0.61.1 (ports) > bbkeys 0.8.3(ports) in your ~/.bbtools/bbkeys.bb or /usr/share/bbtools/bbkeys.bb ! set this to true to allow stacked cycling to go to any window on any ! workspace. all of the windows will appear in the menu if it is being shown. !bbkeys.menu.showAllWorkspaces: True xOr -- I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. msg04785/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: BB Feature
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, Joe MacDonald wrote: > Actually, the way it works right now is far more useful to me. I tend > to have a lot of shells open in different workspaces and when I want > to get at one I've minimized, it is far more helpful for me to only > see the list of ones I've minimized in the current workspace. yes, it's useful and nobody wants to remove it from blackbox. but an *additional* "all windows&icons menu" would be more useful to me: I'm using 9 workspaces. My current workspace is 1 and i need the web browser here. The browser is still running but i can't remember where (and perhaps it's shaded and not on top of the screen!!). I move through eight workspace submenus, failed to notice the browser in submenu 6 and cannot find it in the Icons submenu. So i restart my search ... Ciao, Mark
Re: BB Feature
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, xOr wrote: > You can set up bbkeys to show the windows on all workspaces in its > list. So then when you hit alt-tab (or whatever you want) and get a > list of all windows and just release th emodifier key (alt in this > case) to switch to the window of your choice. How do i set this up? I only get a menu that shows the windows of the *current* workspace. If i change to an empty workspace there's no menu available. FreeBSD 4.4 + XFree86 3.3.6 blackbox 0.61.1 (ports) bbkeys 0.8.3(ports) Ciao, Mark
Re: Blackbox Web Design
its perfect - simple, fast, easy to read and find what you want. I really like it too :] - Original Message - From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Blackbox Web Design > On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 08:39, xOr wrote: > > Well, my vote still holds with http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb2/ > > It's got, and had my vote from the beginning. Good use of space in all > browsers from what I can see. > > Jamin W. Collins >
Re: Possible Spin-Lock with 0.61.2pre4
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 11:45, xOr wrote: > Has this problem gone away in any releases since 0.61.2pre4? Unfortunately, the last version I tried for a prolonged period thus far still exhibited it at least once that I caught, and that was version 0.62.0pre0. I've since upgraded that box to 0.62.0pre2 and have been monitoring it. Jamin W. Collins
Re: Blackbox Web Design
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 08:39, xOr wrote: > Well, my vote still holds with http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb2/ It's got, and had my vote from the beginning. Good use of space in all browsers from what I can see. Jamin W. Collins
Re: bbkeys questions/comments
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:59:23PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote: > > > The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your > > > keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString gives 1 characters: > > > "f"), etc. in your ~/.bbkeysrc as shown in the README. > > > > That's what I tried, but I kept getting "XLookupString gives 0 > > characters: ""). I went back to try it again after getting your message, > > and noticed that right after the keycode there's a bit that reads > > "(keysym 0xffe7, SunFront)" (this is also how xev treats > > Mod/CTRL/Shift). D'oh! I put "SunFront" as the KeyToGrab in bbkeysrc and > > everything's working fine. > > Since we're talking about key-bindings, how would I go about using keys > that xev displays no character or keysym for? All the "windows" keys on > my keyboard return only a differing keycode. There is no keysym for > them and certainly no character. On a few other keyboards, I have extra > buttons that likewise don't return keysyms or characters. > > Any ideas, or are they just dead keys? Try mapping them with xmodmap. xOr -- I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. msg04779/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bbkeys questions/comments
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote: > > The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your > > keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString gives 1 characters: > > "f"), etc. in your ~/.bbkeysrc as shown in the README. > > That's what I tried, but I kept getting "XLookupString gives 0 > characters: ""). I went back to try it again after getting your message, > and noticed that right after the keycode there's a bit that reads > "(keysym 0xffe7, SunFront)" (this is also how xev treats > Mod/CTRL/Shift). D'oh! I put "SunFront" as the KeyToGrab in bbkeysrc and > everything's working fine. Since we're talking about key-bindings, how would I go about using keys that xev displays no character or keysym for? All the "windows" keys on my keyboard return only a differing keycode. There is no keysym for them and certainly no character. On a few other keyboards, I have extra buttons that likewise don't return keysyms or characters. Any ideas, or are they just dead keys? Jamin W. Collins
Re: Blackbox Web Design
On Tue, Jan08,02 14:50, Bill Beal wrote: > Thread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, if we don't need the boxes on the right side, we can do away with > > them. Also, I was sort of fond of the black fading around the edges.. > > But whatever people like... > > > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/lightgfx.html > > Netscape 4.7 still fails miserably in parsing this > correctly. The text in the main part of the page runs clear > off the right side of the browser window, no matter how you > resize or scroll. > > screenshots: http://yaz.adsl.duke.edu/blackbox/ > > (incidentally, I don't use NS4 anymore so this doesn't > bother me. :) > To be a stickler... IE6 still displays a bottom scroll bar (left/right). DC -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle. Registered Linux User Number 195825
Re: Blackbox Web Design
Thread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, if we don't need the boxes on the right side, we can do away with > them. Also, I was sort of fond of the black fading around the edges.. > But whatever people like... > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/lightgfx.html Netscape 4.7 still fails miserably in parsing this correctly. The text in the main part of the page runs clear off the right side of the browser window, no matter how you resize or scroll. screenshots: http://yaz.adsl.duke.edu/blackbox/ (incidentally, I don't use NS4 anymore so this doesn't bother me. :) -- Bill Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bildo.net/
Re: Blackbox Web Design
Yeah, if we don't need the boxes on the right side, we can do away with them. Also, I was sort of fond of the black fading around the edges.. But whatever people like... http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/lightgfx.html Thread
[OT] Re: epistrophy
On Tue, Jan08,02 12:45, Scott Moynes wrote: > * Derek Cunningham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > haha... having recently watched Full Metal Jacket (on DVD no less :), I can > > only hear the above line in a female vietnamese voice, followed by "me so > > horny" haha... perhaps a rephrase? :) > > I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. Was Santa generous with the Kubrick gifts this year? -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle. Registered Linux User Number 195825
Re: Possible Spin-Lock with 0.61.2pre4
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:06:49PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > Recently installed 0.61.2pre4 on my home workstation. Everything seemed > fine 'til just a short while ago. > > I had a few rxvt (v 2.7.6) sessions open along with gkrellm (v1.2.2) and > Evolution (v1.0) and esd (v 0.2.22). I noticed that new mail had > arrived and went to filter my INBOX. That's when I noticed that none of > the applications where responding. The mouse would move without a > hitch, but nothing would respond. I couldn't change to another virtual > terminal and I couldn't kill X (via CTRL-ALT-BKSPCE). I was however > able to remote into the system from my laptop. From the remote session > I noticed that X was taking nearly 100% of the CPU time. I tried > killing the process by sending a SIGTERM, SIGSEGV, and SIGKILL. None of > these worked. I then force a switch to runlevel 3 via 'init 3' and the > X session died. I was then able to switch back to runlevel 5 via 'init > 5' and everything seems to be working again. > > Are there any steps that I could take to provide more useful tracking > information if this happens again? Has this problem gone away in any releases since 0.61.2pre4? xOr -- I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. msg04772/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: epistrophy
* Derek Cunningham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > haha... having recently watched Full Metal Jacket (on DVD no less :), I can > only hear the above line in a female vietnamese voice, followed by "me so > horny" haha... perhaps a rephrase? :) I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. -- Scott Moynes msg04773/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Threads BB Web - Reworked
Some of the changes I've made will allow the site to be viewed at any (GUI) size above 230 wide. Threads design ran into problems at smaller sizes. try it out if you like ; http://planetquake.com/lvl/blackbox/ (I run my monitor at 1600x1200 but never have a web browser wider than 800) - Original Message - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Threads BB Web - Reworked > > On 08-Jan-2002 ray@crytek wrote: > > I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've > > removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also > > removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the > > style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand column > > and a number of small changes > > > > nice work. Both of you. > > Remember, not everyone maximizes their web browser. >
Re: epistrophy
On Tue, Jan08,02 12:14, Scott Moynes wrote: > I uploaded a new epistrophy the other day. There are a few very small > fixes to signal handling, and config file parsing. However, if anyone > one is well versed in the ancient art of lex and yacc, > I would love you long time haha... having recently watched Full Metal Jacket (on DVD no less :), I can only hear the above line in a female vietnamese voice, followed by "me so horny" haha... perhaps a rephrase? :) > if you'd give me a shout. > > -- > Scott Moynes DC -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle. Registered Linux User Number 195825
epistrophy
I uploaded a new epistrophy the other day. There are a few very small fixes to signal handling, and config file parsing. However, if anyone one is well versed in the ancient art of lex and yacc, I would love you long time if you'd give me a shout. -- Scott Moynes msg04769/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Threads BB Web - Reworked
On 08-Jan-2002 ray@crytek wrote: > I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've > removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also > removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the > style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand column > and a number of small changes > nice work. Both of you. Remember, not everyone maximizes their web browser.
Threads BB Web - Reworked
I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand column and a number of small changes This was just a quick re-work and I'll make it XHTML standard if people want to use it (or someone else can if they like) I've tested on w3m, IE6 (win2k) and Mozilla (win2k). This is really Thread's design cut back, thats all Oh yer, the URL :] http://www.planetquake.com/lvl/blackbox/ threads original ca be found here; http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/ Thats all, back to work..
Re: Can click to focus only on title bar or border!
On 07-Jan-2002 Tomas Capdevila wrote: > scott wrote: >> >> Did you turn off all Lock keys (Numlock, Capslock, Scrolllock) ? >> It's a "feature" that blackbox will only do ALT+Click behaviour >> when all the lock keys are off. >> >> There was a patch for 0.61.x that would kill that behaviour, >> did you have the patch compiled into your previous BB, >> and maybe just forgot about it when you upgraded to mdk8.1 ? > > can somebody tell me the name of this patch and/ore where i > can download it? i looked around but couldn't find it. > > thanks for helping! This is fixed in the pre3 that will be released shortly.
Re: Can click to focus only on title bar or border!
jerrold poh wrote: > > > > > can somebody tell me the name of this patch and/ore where i > > can download it? i looked around but couldn't find it. > > http://blackbox.thelinuxcommunity.org/patches.html, go down to the > bottom and look for the patch called > > window resizing and button gra version 0.1 yeah! thank you, worked. i saw this patch but did not realize that it would fix the problem. bye, tomas
Re: Blackbox Web Design
On Mon, Jan07,02 23:31, Thread wrote: > Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the > brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it > as some folks reported it not being variable width. It was, in fact, > designed to be variable width. > > Should be all good now, though. > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox > > Thanks > > -Thread Still got a bottom (left/right) scroll bar in ie6 and I'm using 1024x768 resolution. Dc -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle. Registered Linux User Number 195825
Re: Blackbox Web Design
WOW! This I REALLY like, Thread! =:) And I'm ECSTATIC to read that
we've finally come up with a "fix for the door whack monkey glitch in
the centralcome out and fling small things into people's eyes"
YAROOH!!! =:)
LOL
Seriously, I dig this design heavily.
I may have to, um, borrow it for myself... =:)
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 22:03, Thread wrote:
> Wacha guys think of this?
>
> http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox
>
> We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I
> also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll
> see what people like.
>
> -Thread
>
--
%<--%<
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
Re: bbkeys questions/comments
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 19:38, Imad wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help, and for bbkeys!
>
Thanks for the thanks!! =:)
> Best,
>
> --Imad "(e)magius" Hussain
> _
> "There is much to be known and above all, much to be loved... Indeed,
> the more we find to love, the more we add to the measure of our hearts."
>
> -- Lloyd Alexander (via Adaon), _The Black Cauldron_
> __
>
--
%<--%<
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26
Re: Blackbox Web Design
Thread wrote: > Wacha guys think of this? > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox > > We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I > also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll > see what people like. > > -Thread > > > Best design so far.. Great work! -- --- LogiC - ICQ # 15464613 - http://ghosthouse.linux.se ---
Re: Blackbox Web Design
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Thread wrote: > Wacha guys think of this? > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox > > We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I > also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll > see what people like. Well, my vote still holds with http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb2/ Shaleh, maybe we could set up a poll on the bb sourceforge site once the contest "closes"? xOr -- I am damn unsatisfied to be killed in this way. msg04760/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Blackbox Web Design
In message: Re: Blackbox Web Design (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) on 08/01/2002 (Tue 08:14) Joe MacDonald wrote: > . . . looks pretty good in dillo 0.6.2. Although it would be nice if > the center column had a minimum width specified as a percentage of the > window-size. Ah, turns out that's just dillo's half-implemented rendering, nothing wrong with the page as far as I can see. -Joe. -- Joe MacDonald :wq
Re: Blackbox Web Design
In message: Re: Blackbox Web Design (<20020107233150.A1360@Thread>) on 07/01/2002 (Mon 23:31) Thread wrote: > Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the > brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it > as some folks reported it not being variable width. It was, in fact, > designed to be variable width. > > Should be all good now, though. > That's a lot better with w3m, IMHO. And it looks pretty good in dillo 0.6.2. Although it would be nice if the center column had a minimum width specified as a percentage of the window-size. Either way, since I do most of my browsing with w3m, and it looks good there, I like it. -Joe. -- Joe MacDonald :wq
神话新浪潮
ÄúºÃ ±¾ÓʼþÊÇÉÆÒâÓʼþ£¬Èç¹ûÄú²»ÐèÒªÇëɾ³ý ´òÈÅÖ®´¦£¬¾´ÇëÔÁ£¡£¡£¡ ÂÌÉ«²úÆ·--³ÏÕ÷µØÇø¶À¼Ò´úÀí ±¾²úÆ·Êǹú¼ÒרÀûÄÉÃ×ÐͲúÆ·£¬¹úÄÚÎÞͬÀà²úÆ· ¿ÉÒÔ¶ÒÔÚÍ¿ÁÏÖУ¬·¿ÎÝ×°ÐÞºó3-4Ìì ¿ÉÏû³ý²úÉúµÄ·ÏÆø£¬¼´¿ÉÈëס ÓпÉÏû³ýÈÕ³£µÄÓÍÑ̺Íù棬 ²¢Ô´Ô´²»¶ÏÊͷŸºÀë×Ó ¿ÉÔ¤·ÀºôÎüµÀºÍÐÄѪ¹Ü¼²²¡ ¼Û¸ñµÍÁ®£¬Êг¡¹ãÀ«£¨ÃñÕ¬°ì¹«Â¥¾ù¿É£© ÍûÓÐΪ֮ʿ£¬À´µç´¹Ñ¯ Éñ»°ÉÌó£¨ÔÆÄÏ£©ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ µç»°£º0871-3615661 3628042 ´«Õ棺0871-3615662 ÊÖ»ú£º0-13013318527 ÁªÏµÈË£ºÐ¤·ïÁá С½ã
Re: Blackbox Web Design
Thread wrote: > Wacha guys think of this? > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox > > -Thread Very nice, i like it. amazingly, it is very readable with lynx, links, mozilla, or MSIE. My one suggestion would be to move the two light grey boxes on the right over to the left, to give more room for the text. I usually browse with a non-maximized mozilla window, so my first impression of your page was a lot of 3-word lines squeezed in the middle of four large and imposing grey boxes. :-)
Re: Blackbox Web Design
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:03:16 -0500 Thread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wacha guys think of this? > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox > > We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I > also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll > see what people like. > Very nice with Mozilla 0.9.7 Can't scroll far enough in Nutscrape 4.79 to see the boxes on the right side! (1280x1024) Dave
Re: Blackbox Web Design
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:31:50 -0500 > From: Thread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Blackbox Web Design > > Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the > brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it > as some folks reported it not being variable width. It was, in fact, > designed to be variable width. > > Should be all good now, though. > > http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox > > Thanks > > -Thread This doesn't look very well IMO. In a 80x24 term the page is divided into three equal-width cols, middle one running much longer than the other two, of course. It's ridiculous amount of wasted space, not to mention that it's not comfortable to read. -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 10:40AM up 12 days, 21:18, 17 users, load averages: 0.11, 0.03, 0.01
: blackbox-0.61.1-icon-patch.v9 - ¿¿¿ blackbox-0.62.x-icon-patch.v9 ???]
·_·_·_·_·_·_·_···:·:·_:"·_:·_:·:_··"_:·:_·:__:·_:_:·_:·_:·:_·:_·_:··_:·!"_: :·":·:_·:_·_:·:_·_:··_!:·!_:":_:·!:_!·:_·_:·:_·:_!"·_:!·"_:"!·"·!_:"!·_:"!·_: this patch is aviable to 0.62preX version? please, let me now please.. thanx.. iblood :-) este parche esta disponible para la version 0.62pre. porfa hazmelo saver ya... probe cambiando algunas cosas del parche pero no funciono, jeje.. gracias
