Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 88, Issue 36

[Larry Stern]

This is awesome news still holding my breath till it becomes official on the 
Cisco's website, I am now even prouder to be part of this community, a group of 
people who articulated so well what was wrong, and gave all the right reasons 
why it should be corrected.

I got many grey hairs the past week.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 8:04 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 88, Issue 36

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition path from CCIE
  Voice to CCIE Collaboration (nielsenj)
   2. Re: Lab strategy (Somphol Boonjing)
   3. Re: Lab strategy (Bill Lake)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:35:51 -0500
From: nielsenj 
To: michael.se...@compucom.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco: Provide a reasonable transition
path from CCIE Voice to CCIE Collaboration
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Just got this in my email:

Hi All, Great news! Cisco has made the following announcement: "We are 
listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be adjusting 
the 
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_collaborationCCIE
Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the evolution of the CCIE 
Collaboration certification, a current holder of the 
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_voice CCIE 
Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration 
credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We appreciate 
all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we update our 
webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating further details about 
this modification as soon as possible."
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20968 Regards, Rigo Cisco Learning 
Network Moderator



Jason Nielsen
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM,  wrote:

> If you haven't already done so please sign this petition:
> http://chn.ge/17A0zXE
>
> Michael Sears, CCIE(V)#38404
> "Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified
> Computing Systems"
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:14 +1000
From: Somphol Boonjing 
To: Martin Sloan 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
singh , ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab strategy
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Just my personal experience when I failed my first lab attempt.   CUE is at
the forefront of the time waster.   Simply because it requires constant
reboot if mistake is made and every reboots take a long time too.

>> 10 ) CUE integration and trafer setup takes 20 mins

My brain seems to go numb at times too.  Simple stuff becomes a lot harder, and 
I still looking back on the day as how on earth I miss that easy fix.
Not saying that without it I would pass, I just think I wouldn't the thoroughly 
outclassed by it.

Regards,
--Somphol.


--Somphol


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Martin Sloan wrote:

> Let me say, I've never sat the lab so I'm just commenting on my own
> study experience.
>
>  - Points 3 & 4 are probably consuming too much time.  Documenting
> IP's is good but I don't currently go through and check configs.  I
> figure i'll get to it when it's time to configure that piece and if
> there are issues I'll do my troubleshooting then.
>  - 1.5hrs for Br2 seems like a long time.  I think you can get quicker
> with that part and do it in 45min or less, depending on the complexity.
>
> Just with those savings you're getting closer to your 6 hour goal.  I
> use notepad for anything that can be repeated like dial-peers,
> translation rules/patterns, dspfarm, QoS, etc.  I think its MUCH
> faster than manually typing the configs each time.  I always configure
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AXL integration

[Larry Stern]

Also make sure in CUC, under phone system AXL server you have 5.0 or greater 
checked and in CUCM under system TAB Application server do you have the CUC 
there.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:54 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Fwd: CUC and AARneed some help (Kevin Spicer)
>   2. Re: Fwd: CUC and AARneed some help (Juan Lopez)
>   3. Re: CUC integration - AXL API (Rrcrumm)
>   4. Re: CUC integration - AXL API (Gurpreet Singh Kukreja)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:31:37 +
> From: Kevin Spicer 
> To: Juan Lopez 
> Cc: CCIE Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUC and AARneed some help
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> Just playing with this in the lab and I think a workaround is to add a
> routing rule (in CUC > Call Management > Call Routing > Forwarded Routing
> Rules).
>
> Add to the top of the list a rule that sends to the 'Attempt Sign In'
> Conversation where the forwarding station is the voicemail pilot number
> (i.e. the number which shows as the redirtecting number in the q931 trace
> when you hit the messages key).
>
> Initial testing this seems to work okay.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Juan Lopez
> wrote:
>
>> Still investigating this but can't seem to find the answer.
>> Form the SRND it states:
>>
>> "By default, the directory number configuration retains the AAR leg of the
>> call in the call history, which ensures that the AAR forward to the voice
>> messaging system will select the proper voice mailbox "
>> This I understand, and gives an indication to what I see: that the AAR
>> function retains the RDNIS of the called party by default. So when I press
>> the VM button on SB phone, and AAR is invoked, CUC's HP external number
>> mask/AAR group is used to get the call over to CUC, but the RDNIS of the
>> called party (CUC's HP) is sent along.
>>
>> I think I am not grasping something basic here - I do not find anything
>> stating that AAR in combination with the VM button does not work. Or I am
>> not seeing things clear anymore. So feedback is appreciated.
>>
>> So if anyone can point me in a good direction it would be great - getting
>> despirate over here ;-D
>>
>> cheers,
>> Juan
>> -- Doorgestuurd bericht --
>> Van: Juan Lopez 
>> Datum: 19 maart 2012 21:58
>> Onderwerp: CUC and AARneed some help
>> Aan: CCIE Study 
>>
>>
>>
>> All, I need some help:
>>
>> I have CUC setup at the HQ. When using AAR between SB and HQ, when the SB
>> phones presses the 'voicemail' button, I would have thought this
>> constitutes a direct call (aka: no RDNIS sent) to voicemail. However, I
>> notice the call is being sent out with the RDNIS of the voicemail hunt
>> pilot. So the caller is connected to the welcome prompt instead...
>>
>> this really strikes me - I did not see that one coming... Is this normal?
>> What can be done so that a direct call to VM from a SB phone - to listen to
>> his/her voicemail messages - is sent to the subscribers' inbox instead? (I
>> cannot uncheck de delivery of RDNIS at the SB GW, as this needs to be sent
>> for forwarded calls)
>>
>> any help is greatly appreciated.
>> Juan
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:41:07 +0100
> From: Juan Lopez 
> To: Kevin Spicer 
> Cc: CCIE Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: CUC and AARneed some help
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Kevin,
> thx for the feedback - that is indeed the workaround
>
> I was just hoping to get more feedback on this - sharing knowledge instead
> of figuring everything out by yourself, is what the idea of a public forum
> like OSL is/should be about - but apparently apart from Baktha and you it
> was unidirectional silence unfortunately. Or there are not that many going
> for the ccie voice lately, that could also be the case ;)
>
> cheers & thx,
> Juan
>
>
>
> Op 20 maart

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD

[Larry Stern]

Randall
The example in the Cisco BACD doc for the embedded tcl script has this service 
aa error/typo so be careful when you cut and paste.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 19, 2012, at 2:39 PM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: BACD issue new labs #2 (romain mullier)
>   2. New lab #2 - 3750 Qos (Randall Crumm)
>   3. MVA - Phone hangs up when trying to make a call.
>  (Emanuel Damasceno)
>   4. Re: BACD issue new labs #2 (Randall Crumm)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:09:25 -0500
> From: romain mullier 
> To: Randall Crumm 
> Cc: Online Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD issue new labs #2
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Randall,
>
> You defined the name of your sevice as "app-b-acd-aa" yet your dial-peer is
> invoking "service aa" which does not exist.
> Time to take a coffee break ;-)
>
> Romain
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Randall Crumm  wrote:
>
>> Hi I am trying to call x4000 and have BACD forward to ephone-hunt list.
>>
>> When i call 4001 it works. When I call 4000 I get a busy signal .
>>
>> Any thoughts are appreciated.
>>
>> application
>> service app-b-acd-aa
>>  param voice-mail 4600
>>  paramspace english index 1
>>  param max-time-call-retry 700
>>  param service-name app-b-acd
>>  param number-of-hunt-grps 1
>>  param drop-through-option 1
>>  paramspace english language en
>>  param handoff-string app-b-acd-aa
>>  param max-time-vm-retry 2
>>  paramspace english location flash:
>>  param aa-pilot 4000
>>  param second-greeting-time 60
>>  param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au
>>  param call-retry-timer 15
>> !
>> service app-b-acd
>>  param queue-len 15
>>  param aa-hunt1 4123
>>  param queue-manager-debugs 1
>>  param number-of-hunt-grps 1
>>
>> dial-peer voice 222 voip
>> service aa
>> destination-pattern 4000
>> session target ipv4:10.10.110.3
>> incoming called-number 4000
>> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> codec g711ulaw
>> no vad
>> !
>> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>> incoming called-number .
>> direct-inward-dial
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> telephony-service
>> srst mode auto-provision all
>> em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
>> max-ephones 8
>> max-dn 8
>> ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000
>> time-zone 21
>> time-format 24
>> max-conferences 8 gain -6
>> moh music-on-hold.au
>> transfer-system full-consult
>> create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Feb 19 2012 22:18:09
>> !
>> !
>> ephone-dn  1
>> number 4001
>> label 4001
>> description +442077964001
>> name +442077964001
>> !
>> !
>> ephone  1
>> mac-address 0024.142E.76A9
>> button  1:1
>> !
>> !
>> ephone-hunt 1 longest-idle
>> pilot 4123
>> list 4001
>> !
>> !
>>
>> SiteC-RTR#show ephone reg
>>
>>
>> ephone-1[0] Mac:0024.142E.76A9 TCP socket:[1] activeLine:0 REGISTERED in
>> SCCP ver 17/9
>> mediaActive:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0
>> caps:9
>> IP:10.10.202.122 13500 7962  keepalive 64 max_line 6
>> button 1: dn 1  number 4001  CM Fallback CH1   IDLE
>> Preferred Codec: g711ulaw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Randall
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:15:30 -0800 (PST)
> From: Randall Crumm 
> To: Online Study 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New lab #2 - 3750 Qos
> Message-ID:
><1329678930.97124.yahoomail...@web164603.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> HI,
> I have a question on Qos
> 1. The question wants COS 3 i n the 2nd egress queue, 3rd threshold and COS 5 
> in the 1st egress queue?3rd threshold.
> This is done after running auto qos on the phone switchport. No question
>
>
> 2. COS 5 ?traffic sent to SA-GW(queue set 2) should be dropped if queue is 
> 75% full.?
> Can someone please explain the answer to me. The DSG is not clear to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> ?
> Cheers,
> Randall
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:17:17 -0200
> From: Emanuel Damasceno 
> To: ccie_voice@onl

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Connection off net messages

[Larry Stern]

Yes
A bunch of us are experiencing this, I am currently doing new lab 3, and 
running into the same. At first I thought it was sip integration only, but sccp 
does the same. I believe Vic addressed it as some kind of bug, but have to look 
through the blog emails to confirm.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Embedded BACD Prompts and DropThrough (datucha123 datucha123)
>   2.  Unity Connection off net messages (Baktha Muralidharan)
>   3. MGCP Problems (Emanuel Damasceno)
>   4. Re: MGCP Problems (George Goglidze)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:24:25 +0400
> From: datucha123 datucha123 
> To: AJ BG 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Embedded BACD Prompts and DropThrough
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> 1.   Are prompts also embedded in the IOS? Or do they need to be copied
> in the router?s flash?
>
> No, the Prompts are not embedded in the IOS, you need to manually add them
> into Flash.
>
>
> 2.   Does drop through mode work with embedded BACD?
> Yes, embedded BACD works for Drop Through Mode very well.
>
> You can find the configuration examples here:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/bacd/configuration/guide/40bacd.html#wp1002001
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:59 AM, AJ BG  wrote:
>
>> Two questions about embedded BACD.
>>
>> 1.   Are prompts also embedded in the IOS? Or do they need to be
>> copied in the router?s flash?
>>
>> 2.   Does drop through mode work with embedded BACD?
>> Does anyone have a working copy of embedded BACD configuration?
>> Thanks
>> AJ
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:52:41 -0500
> From: Baktha Muralidharan 
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]  Unity Connection off net messages
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I had the same issue; verified, by doing network capture on UC server, that
> the audio was reaching the server.
>
> /Baktha
>
> Message: 2
>> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:16:10 -0600
>> From: chase mergenthal 
>> To: ccie voice 
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection off net messages
>> Message-ID: 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>>
>> Something weird, I've run into; After doing the integration between CUCM
>> and CUC, I can leave messages from users that have accounts on Unity, but
>> not from the PSTN or other phones...
>>
>> Logs below:
>>
>> 02/18/2012 23:17:33.300
>> |7915,PhoneSystem-PG-001,FBBA1FCBF2B8440982D981A38725901D,Arbiter,-1,Incoming
>> Call [callerID='5002' callerName='Ron Paul' calledID='5600'
>> redirectingID='' lastRedirectingID='' origin=16=Unknown xferType=16=Unknown
>> reason=1=Direct lastReason=1024=Unknown] port=PhoneSystem-PG-001
>> portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=1 callGuid=FBBA1FCBF2B8440982D981A38725901D|
>> 02/18/2012 23:22:40.717
>> |7916,PhoneSystem-PG-001,DA7997B88186462C8AD2A77DC8265A4E,Arbiter,-1,Incoming
>> Call [callerID='911' callerName='Emergency Services' calledID='5002'
>> redirectingID='5002' lastRedirectingID='5002' origin=16=Unknown
>> xferType=16=Unknown reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=4=FwdNoAnswer]
>> port=PhoneSystem-PG-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=1
>> callGuid=DA7997B88186462C8AD2A77DC8265A4E|
>> 02/18/2012 23:22:43.090
>> |7916,PhoneSystem-PG-001,DA7997B88186462C8AD2A77DC8265A4E,MiuGeneral,25,GetLicenseStatusLimit
>> tag='LicRealspeakSessionsMax'. |
>> 02/18/2012 23:22:53.858
>> |7916,PhoneSystem-PG-001,DA7997B88186462C8AD2A77DC8265A4E,MiuGeneral,25,GetLicenseStatusLimit
>> tag='LicMaxMsgRecLenIsLicensed'. |
>> 02/18/2012 23:24:47.859
>> |7915,PhoneSystem-PG-001,20C4C8D64C5D4E3892A77F79D6B5846D,Arbiter,-1,Incoming
>> Call [callerID='3002' callerName='John Adams' calledID='5002'
>> redirectingID='5002' lastRedirectingID='5002' origin=16=Unknown
>> xferType=16=Unknown reason

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge SRST w/ auto provision all

[Larry Stern]

Making SRST line octo rectified this, thanks Vic.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:18 PM, "Vik Malhi"  wrote:

> Are your ephone DN's octo?
>
> --
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Larry Stern  wrote:
>
>> In my case I could not ever get Cbarge in SRST to work, specifically Lab 1 
>> of the new 5 lab Handbook Question 9.2.
>> Hardware conference is registered to SC and Conf works fine. But when you 
>> hit the busy shared line and depress
>> Cbarge,  on SC PH2, you get dial tone as if a new call is to be made. I hard 
>> coded the privacy off on the ephones and even reloaded afterwards. I am not 
>> on a rack now but also tried this at work with the same result. See below.
>> Now that I think about it, is it possible I need hunstop channel on the 
>> shared DN??
>>
>> ephone  1
>>>privacy off
>>>device-security-mode none
>>>mac-address 0026.CBBE.E8C9
>>>ephone-template 1
>>>button  1:3 2:1
>>>
>>>   ephone  2
>>>privacy off
>>>device-security-mode none
>>>mac-address 0026.CBBE.EC4F
>>>ephone-template 1
>>>button  1:4 2:1
>>>
>>>   hardware conf is registered .
>>>
>>>   privacy is disabled under telephony service and in
>>>   ephone. CME version 7.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
>> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:45 PM
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 98
>>
>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>   ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>   http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>   ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>   ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than 
>> "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>  1. Re: Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router without using the CME
>> for SRST (Vik Malhi)
>>  2. Connection for PSTN Hard Phone if using home Lab
>> (Ikenna Izugbokwe)
>>  3. Re: 2651xm instead of 2811's (Anthony Alba)
>>  4. UCCX Session step & Cisco's example script (Anthony Alba)
>>  5. Re: 2651xm instead of 2811's (Edwin Jean-Gilles)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:17:05 +
>> From: Vik Malhi 
>> To: datucha123 datucha123 
>> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
>>   Rajasekar Shanmugam 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router
>>   without using the CME for SRST
>> Message-ID: <1721bd75-1605-4fbe-83d4-0394254d4...@ipexpert.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Bug- doesn't work- need to do it on ephone.
>>
>> --
>> Vik Malhi ? CCIE #13890
>> Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:30 PM, datucha123 datucha123  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You can also configure the Privacy Settings globally, at Telephony-service 
>>> configuration. with "no privacy" command, so that you will not need to 
>>> disable it per ephone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:
>>> I don't see the restriction in OWLE lab #2.
>>>
>>> The HA question 7.1 states "?   You should ensure that all learned 
>>> ephones and ephone-dn?s appear in the running config to achieve this task."
>>>
>>> This indicates srst mode auto-provision all which is required 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge SRST w/ auto provision all

[Larry Stern]

In my case I could not ever get Cbarge in SRST to work, specifically Lab 1 of 
the new 5 lab Handbook Question 9.2.
Hardware conference is registered to SC and Conf works fine. But when you hit 
the busy shared line and depress
Cbarge,  on SC PH2, you get dial tone as if a new call is to be made. I hard 
coded the privacy off on the ephones and even reloaded afterwards. I am not on 
a rack now but also tried this at work with the same result. See below.
Now that I think about it, is it possible I need hunstop channel on the shared 
DN??

ephone  1
>  privacy off
>  device-security-mode none
>  mac-address 0026.CBBE.E8C9
>  ephone-template 1
>  button  1:3 2:1
>
> ephone  2
>  privacy off
>  device-security-mode none
>  mac-address 0026.CBBE.EC4F
>  ephone-template 1
>  button  1:4 2:1
>
> hardware conf is registered .
>
> privacy is disabled under telephony service and in
> ephone. CME version 7.1





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:45 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 98

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router without using the CME
  for SRST (Vik Malhi)
   2. Connection for PSTN Hard Phone if using home Lab
  (Ikenna Izugbokwe)
   3. Re: 2651xm instead of 2811's (Anthony Alba)
   4. UCCX Session step & Cisco's example script (Anthony Alba)
   5. Re: 2651xm instead of 2811's (Edwin Jean-Gilles)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:17:05 +
From: Vik Malhi 
To: datucha123 datucha123 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
Rajasekar Shanmugam 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router
without using the CME for SRST
Message-ID: <1721bd75-1605-4fbe-83d4-0394254d4...@ipexpert.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Bug- doesn't work- need to do it on ephone.

--
Vik Malhi ? CCIE #13890
Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130

On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:30 PM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> You can also configure the Privacy Settings globally, at Telephony-service 
> configuration. with "no privacy" command, so that you will not need to 
> disable it per ephone.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:
> I don't see the restriction in OWLE lab #2.
>
> The HA question 7.1 states "?   You should ensure that all learned 
> ephones and ephone-dn?s appear in the running config to achieve this task."
>
> This indicates srst mode auto-provision all which is required for cBarge 
> preservation since privacy needs to be disabled at the ephone level.
>
> Let me know the details of the lab and question number and I'll try and clear 
> it up- but nonetheless- you are correct in what you have stated- you cannot 
> preserve cBarge with call-manager-fallback
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Vik Malhi ? CCIE #13890
> Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Rajasekar Shanmugam wrote:
>
>> Experts -
>>
>> I`m practicing the scenario 2 from the IP Expert OWLE series & the question 
>> asks us ,  not to use the CME based SRST for BR1. So we are forced to use 
>> the call-manager-fallback. There is a requirement later in the lab ,asking 
>> for Cbarge functionality on SRST. Wondering , if we have an option to 
>> register the hardware media resources (CFB) with the call-manager-fallback 
>> to get this working ? The solution guide suggests to configure the telephony 
>> service in order to do so. Confused here won`t that break the original 
>> requirement  in the HA section , that asked us not to use the CME SRST ? 
>> Please advise.
>>
>> --
>> Raj
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
> 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router

[Larry Stern]

FYI
One of the new 5 labs I think one or two, asks to preserve cbarge when in SRST 
utilizing SRST auto provision all, I could never get this working either, had a 
couple of others on the blog try it with the same result. Any others see the 
same??

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 3:38 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 96

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router without using the CME
  for SRST (Vik Malhi)
   2. enabling Chat option in Cisco Unified personalcommunicator
  (darshan)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:10:23 +
From: Vik Malhi 
To: Rajasekar Shanmugam 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Query wrt to Cbarge on BR1 router
without using the CME for SRST
Message-ID: <4b600abe-666f-436b-8bd2-edd722fdf...@ipexpert.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

I don't see the restriction in OWLE lab #2.

The HA question 7.1 states "?   You should ensure that all learned ephones 
and ephone-dn?s appear in the running config to achieve this task."

This indicates srst mode auto-provision all which is required for cBarge 
preservation since privacy needs to be disabled at the ephone level.

Let me know the details of the lab and question number and I'll try and clear 
it up- but nonetheless- you are correct in what you have stated- you cannot 
preserve cBarge with call-manager-fallback

Thanks


Vik Malhi ? CCIE #13890
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com




On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Rajasekar Shanmugam wrote:

> Experts -
>
> I`m practicing the scenario 2 from the IP Expert OWLE series & the question 
> asks us ,  not to use the CME based SRST for BR1. So we are forced to use the 
> call-manager-fallback. There is a requirement later in the lab ,asking for 
> Cbarge functionality on SRST. Wondering , if we have an option to register 
> the hardware media resources (CFB) with the call-manager-fallback to get this 
> working ? The solution guide suggests to configure the telephony service in 
> order to do so. Confused here won`t that break the original requirement  
> in the HA section , that asked us not to use the CME SRST ? Please advise.
>
> --
> Raj
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:38:06 +0300
From: darshan 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] enabling Chat option in Cisco Unified
personalcommunicator
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Dear Experts;



I want to enable CHAT option in Cisco Unified Personal communicator for
Presence question.



Appreciate your help for this.



Regards

darsh

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 96
**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Bootcamp Lab 1 Script

[Larry Stern]

Randall I sent it to your personal email

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 12:00 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 68

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Bootcamp Lab 1 UCCX solution (Randall Crumm)
   2. Re: CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt (George Goglidze)
   3. Re: CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt (Bruno Nonogaki)
   4. MMoH RSVP CAC (datucha123 datucha123)


--

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:45:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Randall Crumm 
To: Online Study 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Bootcamp Lab 1 UCCX solution
Message-ID:
<1328939155.6805.yahoomail...@web164618.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,
Does anyone have a solution for the UCCX script portion? I do not see it in the 
download and it is not in the DSG.
?
Thanks
Cheers,
Randall
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:13:21 +0100
From: George Goglidze 
To: Bruno Nonogaki 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Bruno,

The command "paramspace callsetup after-hours-exempt true" is only when there 
is a call with that dial-peer as incoming leg, and then going out of another 
dial-peer.
basically when you have call coming from somewhere else like CUCM, then 
choosing as incoming leg dialpeer one with that command, and going out by 
another dialpeer that has a pattern that is blocked.

If you want to allow one patter, it should be NOT included in the blocked 
patter range.  in another words, you will have to be more exact on your block 
pattern.
for example, don't put just 0, put 0

hope this helps,

Cheers,


On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Bruno Nonogaki  wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I was making some tests with After-Hours Call Blocking on CME, for example:
>
> telephony-services
>  after-hours block pattern 1 0 (blocks pattern 0)  after-hours day sun
> start 10:00 11:00
>
> And then I had my dial-peers:
>
> dial-peer voice 1 voip
>  destination-pattern 0190
>  session target ipv4:x.x.x.x
>
> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>  destination-pattern 000T
>  session target ipv4:x.x.x.x
>
> This is just an example... And the call block was working fine. When I
> dialed 0 on my phone, I got the fast busy tone...
> I could configure an exempt on ephone with a PIN (after-hours exempt),
> and even an override-code (after-hours override-code ).
>
> But I am trying to configure an exempt for my dial-peer as well. Let's
> suppose I don't want the dial-peer 1 to be blocked, never, because it
> is an emergency number.
> I tried to configure the line "paramspace callsetup after-hours-exempt
> true" on this dial-peer, according to CME documentation. But it is
> still getting blocked.
>
> Does anyone know how can I use this command to configure a dial-peer
> exempt for Call Blocking?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Bruno
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:30:03 -0200
From: Bruno Nonogaki 
To: George Goglidze 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello George,

Thank you very much for your answer! :)

Rgds,

Bruno


On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:13 AM, George Goglidze  wrote:

> Hi Bruno,
>
> The command "paramspace callsetup after-hours-exempt true" is only
> when there is a call with that dial-peer as incoming leg, and then
> going out of another dial-peer.
> basically when you have call coming from somewhere else like CUCM,
> then choosing as incoming leg dialpeer one with that command, and
> going out by another dialpeer that has a pattern that is blocked.
>
> If you want to allow one patter, it should be N

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD

[Larry Stern]

For your second sub interface I would assign bandwidth 1536, also if you don't 
want to build a map class for the second interface you can assign the bandwidth 
1536 and let auto-qos do the rest.

BACD
In the lab you have access to the CME Docs, it is here where you can find the 
BACD doc and  cli commands.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:22 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 35

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. QOS LFI and BACD files (AJ BG)
   2. Lab Grading (Vega Wong)
   3. Test LAB Upgrade from Cisco CVP 4.1 to CVP 8.0 (darshan)
   4. Re: Test LAB Upgrade from Cisco CVP 4.1 to CVP8.0
  (Emanuel Damasceno)
   5. Re: Lab Grading (Chris Martin)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:02:37 -0800
From: AJ BG 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

  Hello,
   1.   QOS question

According to Vic, if you configure LFI for a subinterface in a hub and spoke 
environment, Your second sub interface will dopes its CIR to 56k. To solve this 
issue you should configure map-class for the second interface as well. I have 
tested this and confirmed the problem and the solution.

 But if the interface bandwidth is not given to you, then in what rate do you 
configure the second map-class? What should be your CIR and MinCIR bandwidth?



2.   BACD question

will it be possible that the lab requirement will be  to configure BACD without 
giving you direct access to the BACD files? If the above scenario happen then 
how would you copy the files into the router. I am thinking to use CUCM. But 
can you even go to Cisco?s website and download BACD tar file during the exam? 
Any suggestion?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:33:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Vega Wong 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading
Message-ID:
<1328596436.37956.yahoomailclas...@web65904.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all

First of all, let me clarify that I am not trying to break NDA or trying to 
sell anything here, just something I cant get my head around with.

I just had my second attmpt yesterday, and I failed. What really demoralising 
for me is that I thought I was fully prepared. What even more demoralising is 
that when I looked at the score card, I didnt get 100% in the area I thought I 
would get a 100%.

I dont mean to say I know it all (especially now), but there are areas on my 
score card that really shocks me. As I read through the exam, I know what the 
questions were requiring (at least I thought I did). For example, we all know 
that the topics of DHCP, NTP, VLAN will be in the network infrastructure area. 
And what could go wrong in those areas? I mean, if you dont setup those area 
correctly, all your subsequence config will has problem right? But yet, I dont 
get full marks in those. Similarly the gateway area, QoS area etc.

Right now I am pretty lost as to what I can prepare or study on, or at least 
how to check my config? I know this sounds really bad (or arrogent) but I 
really have no idea as how to confirm the config I did can get the full mark in 
those area.

I guess I am hoping if someone that share their strategy as to how to confirm 
their work is good or fulfilled the requirement?

hope that makes sense?



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:58:50 +0300
From: darshan 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Test LAB Upgrade from Cisco CVP 4.1 to CVP
8.0
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Dear All;



We have a test LAB with CVP 4.1 and we want to upgrade it to CVP 8.0.



Could you please help me with some documents or step by step procedure to 
accomplish this.



Regards

Darsh

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:19:12 -0200
From: Emanuel Damasceno 
To: 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone Label SRST

[Larry Stern]

Yes it is normal, it puts the e164 number in as the description under the 
ephone-dn.  I guess the  only way you can modify it is if using auto provision 
all or auto provision dn in SRST. Or possibly using a SRST DN Template.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 12:00 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 71, Issue 46

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Phone Label (datucha123 datucha123)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:58:33 +0400
From: datucha123 datucha123 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone Label
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello,

I have noticed, that the Phone Line Label is not passed with SCCP Phone, when 
it goes to SRST.

But when the SIP Phones goes to SRST, then the Line Label is passed on over the 
SRST.

Is it normal?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 71, Issue 46
**

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cue Wizard Authentication

[Larry Stern]

Randall
What a coincidence  Only yesterday on my Pod I had the exact same issue, I 
never resolved it as I was spending too much tine on it, I skipped the Wizard 
(this was an option on the GUI). Either we are both overlooking the same thing 
or perhaps it is a specific cue issue and we both had the same pod. I have done 
this procedure many times without this issue. I am making the assumption you 
were using a plabs pod?? I can't remember what Pod I had but can look it up 
later.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 30, 2011, at 7:57 PM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. PSTN-WAN Enabled Secret (michael.se...@compucom.com)
>   2. Re: CUE wizard authentication issue (linuxboss.9)
>   3. Re: CUE wizard authentication issue (Rrcrumm)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:20:55 -0500
> From: 
> To: 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN Enabled Secret
> Message-ID:
><426D14439C8C604B90E332DD4696917301BD604158@SP049EXC32.compucom.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> All is not lost:
> There are only a few methods you can use to recover from a lost password, but 
> all of them destroy the start-up configuration.
> *Routers that have nonvolatile RAM (NVRAM) chips can be removed and 
> reseated. The NVRAM is implemented with battery-backed up static RAM (SRAM). 
> If you remove the SRAM, the contents of NVRAM are erased as well as the no 
> service password-recovery configuration. Be sure to use proper anti-static 
> procedures when you handle the NVRAM. Some of these routers are 3640 and 3660.
> *Other routers, such as the 1700, 2600, and 3620, use an electrically 
> erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) in order to hold the 
> configuration. The EEPROM does not erase when you remove it.
> *Another method is to reload or boot the router with console access, and 
> press 
> CTRL-BREAK
>  within five to ten seconds of the Cisco IOS software image decompressing or 
> roughly when the "Image text-base:... " part of the banner begins. You are 
> then prompted to reset the router to factory default (erase start-up 
> configuration).
> Hope this helps  --ms
>
> Michael Sears
>
>
>
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:35:54 -0800
> From: "linuxboss.9" 
> To: Randall Crumm 
> Cc: Online Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE wizard authentication issue
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Randall,
>
> 10.10.202.1 is CME IP and you should be able to login to this URL.
> If you are in CUE wizard and you must be using CUE IP URL where you have to
> use the username and password set during CUE reset.
>
> Thanks
> Shrini
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Randall Crumm  wrote:
>
>> HI,
>> I have getting an authentication error when starting the CUE wizard,
>> "Login to Call Manager Express as Administrator failed. Check you Call
>> Manager Express configuration"
>> I am using the username and password from the statement "web admin system
>> name admin password cisco" not the CUE admin username and password.
>>
>>
>> Here is my config:
>>
>> telephony-service
>> sdspfarm units 1
>> sdspfarm transcode sessions 4
>> sdspfarm tag 1 sc-xcoder
>> no auto-reg-ephone
>> max-ephones 8
>> max-dn 8
>> ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000
>> voicemail 3600
>> max-conferences 8 gain -6
>> web admin system name admin password cisco
>> dn-webedit
>> transfer-system full-consult
>> transfer-pattern .T
>> after-hours block pattern 1 900
>> create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Dec 30 2011 23:16:44
>>
>> ip http server
>> ip http authentication local
>> no ip http secure-server
>> ip http path flash:/GUI
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Randall
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:48:19 -0800
> From: Rr

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS version proctorlabs routers

[Larry Stern]

What is the downfall if you cut and paste everything using the minimum sccp ccm 
version 5.0 which all  plab routers IOS supports. I have never had a problem 
doing this.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 28, 2011, at 10:26 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Campus QoS: mls qos trust and service-policy
>  simultaneously clarification needed (Emanuel Damasceno)
>   2. Re: SLRG and Globalization (George Goglidze)
>   3. PLAN and Type (datucha123 datucha123)
>   4. Re: PLAN and Type (datucha123 datucha123)
>   5. Re: IOS version of Proctorlabs Routers (Anthony Alba)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:24:50 -0200
> From: Emanuel Damasceno 
> To: Anthony Alba 
> Cc: CCIE Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Campus QoS: mls qos trust and
>service-policy simultaneously clarification needed
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Anthony,
>
> As I can see your config, it seems it will work properly, but the next hop
> will have to trust that marking otherwise it will be remarked.
>
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
> CCNP Voice
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Anthony Alba wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the definitive requirement for having mls qos trust and
>> service-policy on an interface to work.
>>
>> In the 12.44 command reference
>>
>> "Classification using a port trust state (for example, *mls qos trust* [*
>> cos* | *dscp* | *ip-precedence*] and a policy map (for example, 
>> *service-policy
>> input* *policy-map-name*) are mutually exclusive. The last one configured
>> overwrites the previous configuration. "
>>
>>
>> An earlier thread on the list
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-January/072385.html
>> seems to indicate you can have both "mls qos trust " and
>> "service-policy input"
>>
>>
>> If you want to match on AF31 and re-mark to CS3:
>>
>> !
>> mls qos
>> !
>> class-map AF31
>> match ip dscp AF31
>> !
>> policy-map REMARK
>> class AF31
>>  set ip dscp CS3
>> !
>> int fa0/1
>> service-policy input REMARK
>> !
>> Will this configuration work? Note there is no mls qos trust statement.
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:03:31 +
> From: George Goglidze 
> To: datucha123 datucha123 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SLRG and Globalization
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I think you're overstating a bit there.
>
> in the lab. of course it's meaningless...
> do not even use local route groups unless specifically asked for!!!  use
> specific gateways.
>
> In real life! well it's different story.
>
> say you have the following design:
> client with 1 HQ site, and 10 smaller sites.
> Local GW in smaller sites where all calls should go out from local sites.
> failover to secondary GW in HQ if Local GW is not working.
>
> 1) standard approach
> every site will have it's own ROUTE LIST -> 1 choice - local site gw, 2
> choice HQ gw.
> so this is 10 ROUTE LISTS already.
>
> and now RP:
> RP local 9XXX -> PT-LOCAL -> RL-LOCAL-HQ-siteX
> if call goes out of local gw, then it needs one kind of treatment. if goes
> out of HQ gateway it needs to go as national and needs different treatment.
>
> Here you would have to define the different treatments for every single
> site every time you create route lists and etc.
>
> 2) Local RG approach:
> Only one ROUTE LIST!!! 1 choice LRG , 2 choice HQ gw.
> no need for anything else.
>
> and now TP:
> RP local 9XXX -> PT-LOCAL-siteX -> translatees go E164 standard and
> points to CSS-GLOBAL -> PT-GLOBAL
> this is the only place where you have to duplicate things.
>
> and now RP:
> RP: \+! -> PT-GLOBAL -> RL-LRG-HQ
> only one RP!!!
>
>
> in my example we only had 10 sites... and saved on ROUTE-LISTS
> configurations. now imagine a client with 10.000 locations!!!
>
> read this guide:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Plabs site issues

[Larry Stern]

I am waiting for plabs tech support to get back to me, is anyone else having 
issues accessing the plabs website, I have confirmed a couple of people here on 
the east coast are.

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 10, 2011, at 7:21 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Error Disabling Port in IPX lab 4 (datucha123 datucha123)
>   2. Re: Location Not Working (Mohammed Al Baqari)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:01:38 +0400
> From: datucha123 datucha123 
> To: Chris Martin 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Error Disabling Port in IPX lab 4
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I think that we can have this in real Lab because maybe the Real lab has
> the Non-PoE 3750, so that Inline Power is never taken into consideration.
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Chris Martin  wrote:
>
>> Great thanks Peter.  From my reading that definitely looks like the right
>> command, "switchport voice detect cisco-phone". This appears to protect the
>> voice vlan, but allows a PC or other device on access vlan.  Appears if a
>> device wants to communicate on the voice vlan is has to have drawn PoE from
>> the switch, speak CDP and be full-duplex.
>>
>> If any of these requirements are not met then the port is error disabled.
>>
>> Here is what I did for testing (right now only have remote access to a
>> vrack)
>>
>> **Testing Full duplex**
>>
>> Port 1/0/2 is setup as a typical 3750 port with a 7960 cisco phone.
>> Confirmed inline power is drawn.
>>
>> 1. Power is Up/Up.  Shows up in CDP neighbor.
>> 2. Added switchport voice detect cisco-phone, port Up/Up.  Shut/no shut.
>> Went back to Up/Up.
>> 3. Forced port to half duplex and status = errdisable.
>> 4. Set to duplex full, shut / no shut, back to UP/UP.
>>
>> **Testing PoE**
>>
>> Port 1/0/23 is setup with 7962 but either a l2vpn or power brick, inline
>> power = 0.
>>
>> 1. Port is Up/Up.  Shows up in CDP neighbor, 0 power drawn from switch.
>> 2. Added switchport voice detect cisco-phone immediately into errdisable.
>> 3. Removed command, shut/no shut and back up.
>>
>> I don't have a good way to test CDP errdisable portion within the vrack.
>> I did try disabling cdp causing the phone to reside in the access vlan,
>> than making both voice and access the same but that didnt work.  Otherwise
>> I could do LLDP but the only PoE connected phone in IPX 3750 is a 7960
>> which doesn't support it.
>>
>> Thanks for the right direction Peter.  I saw error disabled and assumed
>> switchport security.  Overall due to the requirement of inline power I
>> doubt we will see this in the lab, but fun testing and I think a great
>> command I will add to my POE/CDP switch deployment template.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Peter Simmons  wrote:
>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> Looks to me like you need the "switchport voice detect" command here.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/12/2011 07:57, datucha123 datucha123 wrote:
>>>
 Can you please update the solution to this question, when you will get
 it to work

 On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Chris Martin >>> > wrote:

   So I am working on the new 5-lab pack from IPX, in lab 4 step 1.2
   you are asked to cause a port on the 3750 to go into error disable
   status if a non cisco phone is connected.  Unfortunately the DSG is
   not available yet for this lab. Here is what I have thought but the
   problem with this solution is it will error disable if even a PC is
   connected behind the Cisco phone...  Step 1.1 says assume each phone
   has a phantom computer connected.

   interface FastEthernet1/0/23
 description HQ PHONE 2- 7962 phone
 switchport access vlan 101
 switchport mode access
 switchport voice vlan 102
 switchport port-security maximum 2
 switchport port-security maximum 1 vlan access
 switchport port-security maximum 1 vlan voice
 switchport port-security
 switchport port-security mac-address aabb.ccdd.eeff

   --

   SiteA-Switch#show port-se
   Secure Port  MaxSecureAddr  CurrentAddr  SecurityViolation  Security
   Action
(Count)   (Count)  (Count)
   

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7a workbook1

[Larry Stern]

When using physical phones and a hardware VPN on plabs racks. To simulate SRST 
I make a a call manager group that has Pub only. I then put this group into 
let's say the BR1 device pool (assuming you want to put  BR1 into SRST). I then 
shut off the call manager service for the Pub.  This works for me the best.

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 3, 2011, at 5:03 PM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Lab 7A Workbook 1 (Emanuel Damasceno)
>   2. Re: WAN QOS Strategy Question. (ccielabrat)
>   3. Re: Lab 7A Workbook 1 (Vik Malhi)
>   4. Re: Strange behavior on MGCP gateways (Vik Malhi)
>   5. Re: WAN QOS Strategy Question. (Vik Malhi)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:01:01 -0200
> From: Emanuel Damasceno 
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7A Workbook 1
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I am wondering now how I should test SRST if I am not using any phones from
> Proctorlabs. I am using all hardware phones on my side.
>
> Any ideas?
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:59:28 -0500
> From: ccielabrat 
> To: Ken Wyan 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QOS Strategy Question.
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hey everyone,
> I can confirm after A LOT of testing, if you are given a QOS requirement
> for only one of the two Frame PVCs, and you use Auto QOS, you will have a
> problem.
>
> Auto QOS will automatically config "Frame-relay Traffic shaping" on the
> physical WAN interface and then configure the PVC you are QOS'ing to the
> bandwidth that is noted under the sub interface.
> The other sub interface gets left with the default "frame-relay traffic
> shaping" behavior which is to drop CIR to 56k on the PVC.
>
> Do a "Show Frame PVC " on both PVC's after running auto qos.
>
> I think this could be an intended Rat hole on the exam.
> If you only have to configure Hq-SB QOS and you don't know much more the to
> run autoqos and tweak a couple parameters, your SC communications will
> start to fail with a PVC CIR of 56k.
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Ken Wyan  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think you got 56k value from this document which was published in 2005
>> with IOS version 11. (somehow same age as QoS SRND)
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk237/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800942f8.shtml
>>
>> I think it's better to put auto qos voip or auto qos voip fr-atm in the
>> remaining interface as well (without any bandwidth as it's not mentioned in
>> exam). Then it"ll take 1.5M by default.
>>
>> Is there a command to verify that FRTS use 56k bandwidth because above
>> documents are very old.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:54 AM, ccielabrat  wrote:
>>
>>> To All,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to figure the best/fastest way to get a WAN QOS
>>> requirement completed on exam day.
>>>
>>> I've become very comfortable with Auto-QOS and making the needed tweaks,
>>> so Auto-QOS is the way I'm going to use.
>>>
>>> The one piece of the strategy that I'm stilll wondering about is if WAN
>>> QOS is specified for only one of the PVC's.
>>> Auto-QOS will automatically put Frame-relay traffic shaping on the
>>> physical interface which has the side effect of leaving the "other" pvc
>>> with a 56k PVC speed.
>>>
>>> My solution here is to create a frame-relay map-class with the following
>>> parameters.
>>>
>>> map-class frame-relay Not56k
>>> frame-relay traffice-rate 1536
>>>
>>> I apply this map-class to the "other" sub-interface/PVC which negates the
>>> 56k problem.
>>>
>>> I'm curious if anyone has an opinion on the Pros/Cons of this approach
>>> and if it might negate requirements somehow.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> -

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 149

[Larry Stern]

In case there is a Lab 6, did you ever try this? I have not.

> ip dhcp pool SCDHCP
> >origin file flash:SCDHCP
> >option 150 ip 142.100.64.12 142.100.64.11
> >default-router 142.102.66.254
> > BR2-RTR# more flash:SCDHCP
> > *time* Nov 21 2011 07:52 AM
> > *version* 2
> > !IP addressTypeHardware address Lease expiration
> > 142.102.66.21 /24   id   0100.1B54.951C.D9   Infinite
> > 142.102.66.22 /24   id  0100.1AA1.93E0.F5 Infinite
> > *end*
> >
> > BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei det
> > Device ID: SEP001B54951CD9
> > Entry address(es):
> >   IP address: 142.102.66.21
> > ...
> > Device ID: SEP001AA193E0F5
> > Entry address(es):
> >   IP address: 142.102.66.22
> >
> > I created the SCDHCP doc in notepad.  Uploaded it to CUCM, then 
> > TFTPed
> it to
> > my router.  Once the file is in flash the since dhcp pool looks up 
> > the static IPs in the file then assigns it to the appropriate phone.
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Peter Jeff  > wrote:
> > The real question is why is a question like this in the CCIE From: 
> > Mark


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:55 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 149

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: SIP phones 7940 not registering with CME
  (datucha123 datucha123)
   2. Re: I'M DONE!!! (Ashraf Ayyash)
   3. Congatulations (Larry Stern)
   4. Re: lab - 6 (=?utf-8?B?Ymt2YWxlbnRpbmVAZ21haWwuY29t?=)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:38:14 +0400
From: datucha123 datucha123 
To: Mohd Baqari 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP phones 7940 not registering with
CME
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

When the IP Phones are placed in a differnet subnet (where the CUCME cannot 
authenticate based on MAC address) we have to use the Username and Passwords 
for Authentication.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Mohd Baqari wrote:

>  Username and passwors aren't mandatory.
>
> Post your config. Also post the output of debug ccsip message
>
> Regards,
> Mohammed Al Baqari
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 3:12 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
> 
> wrote:
>
>   Try configure "upgrade" and "file text" commands under the Voice 
> Register Global.
>
> Also if your IP Phone and CUCME Routers are not in the same Broadcast 
> domain, then configure the Username and Password and set the 
> "authenticate register" command in Voice Register Global.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matt dos Santos 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello buddies,
>>
>> I'm facing problem with sip phones 7940 not getting register with CME.
>>
>> Any idea?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>
>  ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
> <http://www.platinumplacement.com/><http://www.platinumplacement.com/>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:47:01 -0600
From: Ashraf Ayyash 
To: Mark Reed 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I'M DONE!!!
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Many congratulation Man ,

Enjoy the X Box Time :))

Ash
CCIE Voice # 31524

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Mark Reed  wrote:
> I forgot the most important part.? Mark L Reed CCIE #31990
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Mark Reed  wrote:
>>
>> I took my second attempt at RTP yesterday and passed.? Thank you to 
>> IPExpert for the great study materials.? Going through their 
>> materials 60 hours a 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5 New labs what to watch for!!!

[Larry Stern]

I also found in my rack 33, the pstn line 3 for calling number only sends 408
I had to modify this in the PSTN router

 rule 2 from
/^\(408\)8397263$ to /^408\(8397263)/ /\1/.
Try typing that fast on an IPAD(lol)
This was for lab 1and 2.

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:12 PM, "Edgar Feliz" 
mailto:ejzi...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Guys I have been working on the new (5) labs mostly 1-3 since they have the 
guide. Here is what i have found to be things to watch for and fixes,

Please note i have been working on these for over 10 days and it's the same 
every time it is just the way the integration was done for the VM images 
purposely or not.


 1.  There are some typos you will see reference to 011916745738931 but if you 
try to call that number it is not available true number is 011916745738931
 2.  There are some others name of routers in guide not always right when you 
look for solutions so just make sure you note what router you are working on. I 
think this is mainly because of copy and pasting from one lab to another etc 
since some things are similar but devices are different.
 3.  UCCX integration;

*   rmjtapi app-user is not configured > add rmjtapi > add phones and cti 
enable
*   make sure pwds match on CCX and CUCM for jtapi_1 and rmjtapi
*   from CCX run sync and restart engine
*   You may have to re-sync a couple of times

 1.  the "T" flag is not set so the CUCM never sees that the CCX is integrated 
you have to do a manual step to get this up and running so you can add the UCCX 
extension to users,

*   run this command on the CUCM Pub as stated in earleir emails > run sql 
update processconfig set paramvalue="T" where paramname like '%nstalled%'
*   NO need to reload it takes affect right away

 1.  CUC - I have had to reload the CUC server every time for MWIs and to be 
able to leave message... This one I am not sure why I have no fix other than to 
restart the server.
 2.  CUE - As noted in labs WB and Guide you will need to change licenses 
depending on the lab you are working on.
 3.  Lab 2 CCXquestion there is a step missing in the script. a generated 
prompt of zero calls ahead of you when you are the only one  in queue = you do 
need the decrement step (thanks larry)

If i recall or run into any more items of interest i will post back i am in 
last 5 days of prep and will be concentrating on the labs

E



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 191

[Larry Stern]

Randall
I had the same exact problem with New Lab 1, after I ran the SQL command from 
the cucm cli, This fixed the not showing of the  IPCC extension field on my 
cucm enduser page, but after an hour or so of reverting, resyncing uccx I never 
got rmjtapi to show in CUCM as an application user. I tried adding it manually 
into CUCM , and then resyncing UCCX, still ng. Finally moved on.

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:13 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: CUCM/UCCX Intergration (Pradeep Kumar Sharma)
>   2. Re: CUCM/UCCX Intergration (Edgar Feliz)
>   3. Re: CUCM/UCCX Intergration (Edgar Feliz)
>   4. Re: ISDN Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable (Edgar Feliz)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:02:29 +0530
> From: Pradeep Kumar Sharma 
> To: CCIEVoiceKP 
> Cc: Online Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/UCCX Intergration
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> It seems your UCCX server is not integrated properly with CUCM.
>
> Use http://ccie-musketeers.blogspot.com/search/label/UCCX and fix it.
>
> -SONU-
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, CCIEVoiceKP  wrote:
>
>> Have you re-syched the data yet?  Subsystems --> Unified CM Telephony -->
>> Data Resync
>>
>> KP
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Randall Crumm  wrote:
>>
>>> HI,
>>> I am working on the New Lab 1 UCCX portion. I am suppose to add an UCCX
>>> extension to each user page, but the field to add the UCCX exntension is
>>> not there. I also did not see a "rmjtapi" user in CUCM. This is the user in
>>> the intergration page on UCCX.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Randall
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:36:53 -0500
> From: Edgar Feliz 
> To: CCIEVoiceKP 
> Cc: Online Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/UCCX Intergration
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Run this command on the CUCM Pub you do NOT have to reboot.
>
> run sql update processconfig set paramvalue="T" where paramname like
> '%nstalled%'
>
> E
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:07 AM, CCIEVoiceKP  wrote:
>
>> Have you re-syched the data yet?  Subsystems --> Unified CM Telephony -->
>> Data Resync
>>
>> KP
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Randall Crumm  wrote:
>>
>>> HI,
>>> I am working on the New Lab 1 UCCX portion. I am suppose to add an UCCX
>>> extension to each user page, but the field to add the UCCX exntension is
>>> not there. I also did not see a "rmjtapi" user in CUCM. This is the user in
>>> the intergration page on UCCX.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Randall
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:33:03 -0500
> From: Edgar Feliz 
> To: datucha123 datucha123 
> Cc: Online Study 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/UCCX Intergration
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> That is not the issue there is something wrong with the way the initial
> installations took place and you have to run this command. I have been
> work

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Documentation Access and Where to Go

[Larry Stern]

Awesome

BACD-Cisco unified Call mgr express -Config Guides
Bkgrnd picture--And ring list--- Voice unified communications---iPhones7900 
series---maintain operate--7965 admin guide. However for whatever reason on 
my pod (30) at RTP, I got access denied, but I am told others did not, I do not 
know where they sat. I basically lost those points.



Sent from my iPad

On Nov 25, 2011, at 5:07 PM, "Edgar Feliz" 
mailto:ejzi...@gmail.com>> wrote:

This is a list of what we know could be required urls and features for any 
given lab and were to go to find it if needed. Please add to the list below as 
this was just a starting point. My intent is to have the urls needed as part of 
the 20-30 minute initial read and documentation of the lab and than have a 
better idea of where to go for things that may come out of the blue.


SRND7x

 1.  IPMA =  p936
 2.  EM  = p929
 3.  CUPS = p897

CCX Doc
ICD + 1button = Support > voice & CUCM > Contact Center Express

MVA = CUCM > help > search > mobile voice access > look for H323/PRI

CME Feature and configuration = Documentation > CME> tech notes and config guide

E




This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congatulations

[Larry Stern]

Congratulations
I only wished we compared notes earlier, hooking up with others in the sane 
boat seems to make the journey easier. Lots of luck and hope to be writing 
something similar real soon.

Best regards
Larry

Sent from my iPhone

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on plan type requirements

[Larry Stern]

After attending the boot camp I started using the ISDN Map command on the D 
channel serial interface. This seems to be quicker for me.

Isdn map address ^1212 plan isdn type subscriber
Isdn map address ^011 plan isdn type international

Sent from my iPad

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can't connect via hardware VPN

[Larry Stern]

Edgar

I just signed on fir my 08:00am and can't connect either, did  anyone get back 
to you

Sent from my iPad

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended 
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box 
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted 
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended 
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or 
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 68, Issue 11

[Larry Stern]

Plabs is having VPN issues today, I have been in contact with their support and 
they are aware, no eta yet.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:14 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session   now
>  (pithog...@yahoo.com)
>   2. Re: MOH with H323 gateway (Chris Martin)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 06:25:48 +
> From: pithog...@yahoo.com
> To: "Rrcrumm" 
> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
>"supp...@proctorlabs.com" ,
>"supp...@ipexpert.com" 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I need hardware Vpn assistance on a
>session now
> Message-ID:
>
> <471010690-1317536907-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-741656333-@b11.c3.bise7.blackberry>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Experts thanks for your assistance.
>
> Attached to this mail is my config , I can access my Pod but the challenge is 
> that the Pc I use for the session should connect to fa 3 according to my 
> config and also give me access to my servers GUI is not working for me, 
> connection to my pod was via console, now I want to do away with console and 
> connect to int fa 3 but my laptop says dns unresolved.
>
> Please take a look at my config and alert me if you have a work through.
>
> Regards
>
> Pithog oil
> Sent from my BlackBerry? Smartphone, from Etisalat. Enjoy high speed internet 
> service with Etisalat easy net, available at all our experience centres
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rrcrumm 
> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 21:47:39
> To: pithog...@yahoo.com
> Cc: Marko Milivojevic; edgar feliz; 
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
> supp...@ipexpert.com; 
> supp...@proctorlabs.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session 
> now
>
> Are you consoled onto the router? You need to do a command from the CLI to 
> VPN in. O can't remember it offhand but it us something like, IPSec VPN 
> client ezvpn connect, then the Cauthen command. Below you said you computer 
> can't reach the Internet. You should use the router CLI.
>
> Hth
> Randall
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:00 PM, pithog...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> The support people at ipexpert have not been helpful in recent times all 
>> they tell me is that there are not ccie level support engineers, I just 
>> changed my hardware vpn to a 881 router last week so its been difficult to 
>> ascertain where the issue is coming from although I have done all I should 
>> do on my end and I had issues through out this morning, as I speak I have 
>> just started a new session, I will appreciate some support now.
>>
>> Thanks marko
>> Sent from my BlackBerry? Smartphone, from Etisalat. Enjoy high speed 
>> internet service with Etisalat easy net, available at all our experience 
>> centres
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marko Milivojevic 
>> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 13:51:57
>> To: edgar feliz
>> Cc: Chris Martin; 
>> pithog...@yahoo.com; 
>> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session 
>> now
>>
>> We've had somewhat a perfect storm of multiple things go wrong. We
>> should be operational right now and we have several support cases open
>> with our ISPs and equipment vendors.
>>
>> Please, get in touch with our support at supp...@ipexpert.com and
>> supp...@proctorlabs.com with any issues that you may still be having.
>> We have our entire support and technical team, including all the
>> instructors working on maintaing our services up and running at the
>> level you are all used to.
>>
>> We sincerely apologize for the inconveniences.
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:34, edgar feliz  wrote:
>>> To many people are having issue for it to be "operator error"
>>> it's definitely something on their end ISP etc.
>>> EJF
>>> 
>>> From: Chris Martin 
>>> To: pithog...@yahoo.com
>>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 10:31 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I need hardware Vpn assistance on a session
>>> now
>>>
>>> Yo

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor Labs site

[Larry Stern]

Before I contact proctor labs tech support, is anyone else having extremely 
slow service on proctor labs site. Possibly all the racks are in use after 
being blocked out during the two week boot camp period and everyone is logging 
on at once? But I never saw it this slow.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 1, 2011, at 5:15 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" 
 wrote:

> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: MRG&MRGL (Matthew Saskin)
>   2. Re: MRG&MRGL (Mohd Baqari)
>   3. Re: MOH with H323 gateway (Vega Wong)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:00:27 -0500
> From: Matthew Saskin 
> To: "eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com" 
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MRG&MRGL
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> It shouldn't matter provided, in the example provided, each MRG contains
> only resources of the specified type.  Precedence for a MRG within an MRGL
> should only come into play if your MRG's contain the same types of
> resources.
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com <
> eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> If we have to configure MTP,Xcoder,hd_Conference in the HQ site then we
>> will configure 3 MRG MTP_MRG,Xcoder_MRG,conf_MRG after that we will create
>> MRGL for hd_hq_MRGL but now what is correct order for MRG inside the MRGL
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:35:30 +0400
> From: Mohd Baqari 
> To: "eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com" 
> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MRG&MRGL
> Message-ID: <77e4a2f2-eeae-491c-a441-c0f073fbe...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> No need for 3 mrgs. Create one mrg and put all 3 resources into it. Order 
> doesnt matter since those resources are of different types.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammed Al Baqari
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 5:14 PM, "eng_firasoq...@yahoo.com" 
>  wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> If we have to configure MTP,Xcoder,hd_Conference in the HQ site then we will 
>> configure 3 MRG MTP_MRG,Xcoder_MRG,conf_MRG after that we will create MRGL 
>> for hd_hq_MRGL but now what is correct order for MRG inside the MRGL
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 17:16:39 +1000
> From: "Vega Wong" 
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH with H323 gateway
> Message-ID: <01cc800a$109d3bf0$31d7b3d0$@com.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I have investigated further into this issue, and I think I may have found
> the reason for this.
>
> As the MOH server is setup with 1 hop limit with the multicast setting, and
> the HQ router/GW is only 1 hop away, so the moh stream from CUCM can reach
> to the loopback address of the HQ router within 1 hop. But correct me if I
> am wrong, that could be the reason why the moh stream from CUCM can reach
> PSTN caller.
>
>
>
> So my question is, is there a way to make the HQ loopback more than 1 hop
> away?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Bill Lake [mailto:whl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 3:06 AM
> To: Vega Wong
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH with H323 gateway
>
>
>
> Hey maybe you were always getting unicast.   so you might want to check that
> on the H323 gateway.
>
>
>
> You always do the same IP as the CUCM is, so for CUCM set as ip it would be
> 239.1.1.1 by default for G711 on the first CUCM set as MOH, the second one
> would have to be set to a different IP like 239.2.1.1 or 239.1.2.1 as CUCM
> increments for each codec on the last octet.
>
>
>
> SO your CUCM is working to Multicast so you must have

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Huge Discount for ProctorLabs Vouchers

[Larry Stern]

I was on the phone with IPEXPERT sales this morning,  actually the price stays 
the same but they double the no of sessions sessions. If you buy 10 sessions 
they give you 20 at the same price.

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 9:32 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 67, Issue 105

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: cBarge problem using MVA (Rynard Coetzee)
   2. Re: CCIE voice for Cisco Partner (Brian Mulgrew)
   3. Re: cBarge problem using MVA (Ashraf Ayyash)
   4. Re: ntp (edgar feliz)
   5. Re: Huge Discount for ProctorLabs Vouchers (Rrcrumm)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:29:19 +
From: Rynard Coetzee 
To: Ashraf Ayyash 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge problem using MVA
Message-ID:
<97D19F256B859A48A6A93E8A9210E52A1392477B@BYTESEXCH2K10N1.bytes.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Ash
Thanks for the reply ,I turned off the built-in bridge but was still getting 
the error ,I then realised I had Locations CAC set from previous part of the 
lab and that this was causing the cbarge to fail. Working now.
Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Ashraf Ayyash [mailto:ash.ayy...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 September 2011 02:25 PM
To: Rynard Coetzee
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cBarge problem using MVA

Hey Rynard ,

as you are using Cbarge , there is no need for Built in Bridge , you will need 
have the privacy off and the barge method as Cbarge from the phones pages , 
reset the phone and check the behavior ( make sure that you will have conf 
brigde available for the phones inside your MRGL

Ash

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Rynard Coetzee  
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have issue to get cBarge to work when dialling in via my MVA number.
> When I dial the MVA number and then start a new call to my HQ phone
> ,my Branch 2 shows the Remote in Use ,but when I try to Cbarge into
> the call ,I just get a fastbusy. I have Hardware conference bridge
> setup for both HQ and BR2 phones ,any ideas what else the problem
> might be ? Also Built-in bridge and Privacy have been set on both phones.
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>


--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:37:41 +0100
From: Brian Mulgrew 
To: donny f , Brian Mulgrew
,"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE voice for Cisco Partner
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Just the one

On 18/09/2011, donny f  wrote:
> how many CCIE for Master UC ?
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Brian Mulgrew wrote:
>
>> for gold partner status any of the  CCIE tracks are supported, for
>> Master Specializations (e.g. Master of UC) the specific CCIE is required.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 18 Sep 2011, at 08:15, "Marko Milivojevic"  wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 20:07, donny f  wrote:
>> >> hi all,
>> >>
>> >> - anyone know is Cisco Partner  need to have/maintain  certain
>> >> numbers
>> of
>> >>  CCIE voice to meet any Partner requirement with Cisco ?   or CCIE
>> >> voice
>> >> is considered  same as CCIE RS (in that perspective) ?
>> >
>> > From that perspective, all CCIEs are born equal. However, different
>> > CCIE tracks may be required for different partner specializations.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> >
>> > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>> >
>> > Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
>> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>

--
Sent from my mobile device


--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 05:40:05 -0700
From: Ashraf Ayyash 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ to BR1 Netwok Congestion

[larry Stern]

Hi all
 I just got done with Vol 1 Lab 7A, (Media Resources) using PL. 
Whenever BR1 phones called HQ phones I would get "Network congestion 
rerouting" and AAR would be invoked, this LAB has nothing to do with AAR 
but Ichecked Locations and everything is set to unlimited Bandwidth, I 
also checked  PL router configs and Bandwidth was set for 1536 on HQ and 
768 on BR1, what else would cause this. I almost spend 2.5 hours on 
this?. I was using EZVPN with my own 2800 ISR router and 7961 phones. I 
probably should have hit up PL support but wanted to try and figure it 
out.



Thanks
Larry
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Final Configs Folders Labs 1-4

[larry Stern]

On the downloaded files from IP Expert, I noticed in the folder Labeled 
VOL2 configs, once unzipped and opened all the final config folders are 
blank for LABS 1-4, LAB 5 does contain a final config, any reason for 
this or is this just an oversite?.

Thanks
Larry
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com