Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Did anyone have a work around for this, or is it just a limitation? Running into the same issue with the bandwidth total command. James Key From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Parker [cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:34 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Vik, I think we are on to something. Here is what I get with the ras debug turned on: BR2#debug ras H.323 RAS Messages debugging is on BR2#h323chan_dgram_send:Sent UDP msg. Bytes sent: 83 to 172.16.101.1:1719 fd=2 .Jan 14 15:28:55.172 CET: RASLib::GW_RASSendRRQ: RRQ (seq# 3729) sent to 172.16.101.1 .Jan 14 15:28:55.180 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:55.180 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=2 of type CONNECTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:55.180 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=2 .Jan 14 15:28:55.180 CET: h323chan_dgram_recvdata:rcvd from [172.16.101.1:1719] on fd=2 .Jan 14 15:28:55.180 CET: RCF (seq# 3729) rcvd .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=3 of type CONNECT_PENDING has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=0 of type LISTENING has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=3 of type CONNECTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.404 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=3 .Jan 14 15:28:56.408 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.408 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=4 of type ACCEPTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.408 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=4 h323chan_dgram_send:Sent UDP msg. Bytes sent: 119 to 172.16.101.1:1719 fd=2 .Jan 14 15:28:56.412 CET: RASLib::GW_RASSendARQ: ARQ (seq# 3730) sent to 172.16.101.1 .Jan 14 15:28:56.420 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.420 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=2 of type CONNECTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.420 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=2 .Jan 14 15:28:56.420 CET: h323chan_dgram_recvdata:rcvd from [172.16.101.1:1719] on fd=2 .Jan 14 15:28:56.420 CET: ARJ (seq# 3730) rcvdparse_arj_nonstd: ARJ Nonstd decode succeeded, remlen = 1 .Jan 14 15:28:56.424 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.424 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=3 of type CONNECTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.424 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=3 .Jan 14 15:28:56.436 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.436 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=4 of type ACCEPTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.436 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=4 .Jan 14 15:28:56.436 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket .Jan 14 15:28:56.436 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=4 of type ACCEPTED has data .Jan 14 15:28:56.436 CET: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=4 Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
yup. Gatekeeper looks at g711ulaw as 2 (64k) call legs for a total of 128. Thanks, ryan Trauernicht On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote: Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Hi Chris: The problem is that the router that is registered to the GK sends an ARQ to the GK, and due to the fact you have configured bandwidth total with a value less than 128k the call is rejected. The question is, why, if we are using a dial peer with session target a loopback IP address, does it send an ARQ to the GK. I was reading a lot trying to find the answer, and it is not a bug, it is the normal behaviour, the recommendation for a one zone GK when yor are required to do CAC is to configure at least 128k, when you have more than one zone, you have to use the interzone command, and generally, when you have a single zone there is no CAC requirement. Maybe Vik have another point of view, but that is what I found when I saw this problem first time. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Miércoles, Enero 14, 2009 9:34 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- -- *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Hi Cyrus: I could not find any other solution, is the way it works, when is one zone and you have an specific CAC requirement, I would suggest to use the interzone command, however for one zone it does nothing. Regards, Jose From: Cyrus [mailto:cyrus@gmail.com] Sent: Miércoles, Enero 14, 2009 11:15 AM To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) Cc: Chris Parker; Vik Malhi; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hey , If u configure 128 as total bandwidth your call would not going through. BACD needs at least 144 to work properly. The reason is with BACD u have one 16k call (if using G729 over wan) and one 128K call (this is caused by CME ARQ to GK) The question is if requirement be like that : -the minimum configuration lines to GK work properly - so 1 zone should be used -use cac to limit your call to sth less than 144 - run BACD on CME Is there any way to accomplish this? I couldn't find a way myself. It would be great if someone comes up with new idea to do this On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Chris: The problem is that the router that is registered to the GK sends an ARQ to the GK, and due to the fact you have configured bandwidth total with a value less than 128k the call is rejected. The question is, why, if we are using a dial peer with session target a loopback IP address, does it send an ARQ to the GK. I was reading a lot trying to find the answer, and it is not a bug, it is the normal behaviour, the recommendation for a one zone GK when yor are required to do CAC is to configure at least 128k, when you have more than one zone, you have to use the interzone command, and generally, when you have a single zone there is no CAC requirement. Maybe Vik have another point of view, but that is what I found when I saw this problem first time. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Miércoles, Enero 14, 2009 9:34 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- -- *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Hey , If u configure 128 as total bandwidth your call would not going through. BACD needs at least 144 to work properly. The reason is with BACD u have one 16k call (if using G729 over wan) and one 128K call (this is caused by CME ARQ to GK) The question is if requirement be like that : -the minimum configuration lines to GK work properly - so 1 zone should be used -use cac to limit your call to sth less than 144 - run BACD on CME Is there any way to accomplish this? I couldn't find a way myself. It would be great if someone comes up with new idea to do this On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Chris: The problem is that the router that is registered to the GK sends an ARQ to the GK, and due to the fact you have configured bandwidth total with a value less than 128k the call is rejected. The question is, why, if we are using a dial peer with session target a loopback IP address, does it send an ARQ to the GK. I was reading a lot trying to find the answer, and it is not a bug, it is the normal behaviour, the recommendation for a one zone GK when yor are required to do CAC is to configure at least 128k, when you have more than one zone, you have to use the interzone command, and generally, when you have a single zone there is no CAC requirement. Maybe Vik have another point of view, but that is what I found when I saw this problem first time. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Miércoles, Enero 14, 2009 9:34 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- -- *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a -- Sirus Moghadasian CCIE #21862 (RS)
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Thanks Jose, Strange stuff to say the least... My GK config is multizone so I will adjust my bandwidth statements accordingly. Chris Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) wrote: Hi Chris: The problem is that the router that is registered to the GK sends an ARQ to the GK, and due to the fact you have configured bandwidth total with a value less than 128k the call is rejected. The question is, why, if we are using a dial peer with session target a loopback IP address, does it send an ARQ to the GK. I was reading a lot trying to find the answer, and it is not a bug, it is the normal behaviour, the recommendation for a one zone GK when yor are required to do CAC is to configure at least 128k, when you have more than one zone, you have to use the interzone command, and generally, when you have a single zone there is no CAC requirement. Maybe Vik have another point of view, but that is what I found when I saw this problem first time. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Miércoles, Enero 14, 2009 9:34 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- -- *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Ok- Jose got it right and this is what he was about to say (right?) What is the difference between these two dial-peers on a gateway registered to GK? Dial-peer voice 1 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ras ... AND Dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:Loopback0 IP Address ... When peer 1 is used an ARQ is sent to GK- it contains a bandwdidth Request and also a called # that needs resolving. When peer 2 is used an ARQ is also sent to the GK since this is also a VOIP call on a gateway to a gatkeeper- it contains just a bandwidth request though since we already did the resolution on the gateway (Lo0). With the B-ACD call we all know that we are sending the call to himself- the Loopback interface- as a workaround to invoke service aa on the inbound voip dial-peer. However the gateway/gk is master/slave and no VOIP call can take place without GK's authorization. The gateway doesn't cross-reference locally configured ip addresses for every session target. So even though the call is local GK still needs to accept the bandwidth request. And this is where bandwidth total ... 128 would hurt you since the B-ACD call will always use g711ulaw and the INTRA-bandwidth required is going to be 128kbps. Bandwidth total and B-ACD are dangerous for this reason. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:34:13 -0500 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Yeah. 128 will be enough for calls made locally from the CME phones though. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Cyrus cyrus@gmail.com Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:15:07 +1100 To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com Cc: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hey , If u configure 128 as total bandwidth your call would not going through. BACD needs at least 144 to work properly. The reason is with BACD u have one 16k call (if using G729 over wan) and one 128K call (this is caused by CME ARQ to GK) The question is if requirement be like that : -the minimum configuration lines to GK work properly - so 1 zone should be used -use cac to limit your call to sth less than 144 - run BACD on CME Is there any way to accomplish this? I couldn't find a way myself. It would be great if someone comes up with new idea to do this On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Chris: The problem is that the router that is registered to the GK sends an ARQ to the GK, and due to the fact you have configured bandwidth total with a value less than 128k the call is rejected. The question is, why, if we are using a dial peer with session target a loopback IP address, does it send an ARQ to the GK. I was reading a lot trying to find the answer, and it is not a bug, it is the normal behaviour, the recommendation for a one zone GK when yor are required to do CAC is to configure at least 128k, when you have more than one zone, you have to use the interzone command, and generally, when you have a single zone there is no CAC requirement. Maybe Vik have another point of view, but that is what I found when I saw this problem first time. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Miércoles, Enero 14, 2009 9:34 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi - CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- -- *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Vic, Loopback solution is used as workaround to force CME to kick in the Xcoder.As we can see with G711 ,there is no need for loopback solution. But BACD work properly ,we need at least 144k BW on GK, please correct me if I'm wrong 128+16 for incoming calls from WAN On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: Ok- Jose got it right and this is what he was about to say (right?) What is the difference between these two dial-peers on a gateway registered to GK? Dial-peer voice 1 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ras ... AND Dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:Loopback0 IP Address ... When peer 1 is used an ARQ is sent to GK- it contains a bandwdidth Request and also a called # that needs resolving. When peer 2 is used an ARQ is also sent to the GK since this is also a VOIP call on a gateway to a gatkeeper- it contains just a bandwidth request though since we already did the resolution on the gateway (Lo0). With the B-ACD call we all know that we are sending the call to himself- the Loopback interface- as a workaround to invoke service aa on the inbound voip dial-peer. However the gateway/gk is master/slave and no VOIP call can take place without GK's authorization. The gateway doesn't cross-reference locally configured ip addresses for every session target. So even though the call is local GK still needs to accept the bandwidth request. And this is where bandwidth total ... 128 would hurt you since the B-ACD call will always use g711ulaw and the INTRA-bandwidth required is going to be 128kbps. Bandwidth total and B-ACD are dangerous for this reason. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:34:13 -0500 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Vik, Makes complete sense. What if the voip peers used the SIP protocol? In that case I guess the GK would not be involved? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Ok- Jose got it right and this is what he was about to say (right?) What is the difference between these two dial-peers on a gateway registered to GK? Dial-peer voice 1 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ras ... AND Dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:Loopback0 IP Address ... When peer 1 is used an ARQ is sent to GK- it contains a bandwdidth Request and also a called # that needs resolving. When peer 2 is used an ARQ is also sent to the GK since this is also a VOIP call on a gateway to a gatkeeper- it contains just a bandwidth request though since we already did the resolution on the gateway (Lo0). With the B-ACD call we all know that we are sending the call to himself- the Loopback interface- as a workaround to invoke service aa on the inbound voip dial-peer. However the gateway/gk is master/slave and no VOIP call can take place without GK's authorization. The gateway doesn't cross-reference locally configured ip addresses for every session target. So even though the call is local GK still needs to accept the bandwidth request. And this is where bandwidth total ... 128 would hurt you since the B-ACD call will always use g711ulaw and the INTRA-bandwidth required is going to be 128kbps. Bandwidth total and B-ACD are dangerous for this reason.
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
The Loopback solution is used for calls from the WAN invoking the AA and also CME phones calling the AA- (144/128). -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Cyrus cyrus@gmail.com Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:13:45 +1100 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vic, Loopback solution is used as workaround to force CME to kick in the Xcoder.As we can see with G711 ,there is no need for loopback solution. But BACD work properly ,we need at least 144k BW on GK, please correct me if I'm wrong 128+16 for incoming calls from WAN On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: Ok- Jose got it right and this is what he was about to say (right?) What is the difference between these two dial-peers on a gateway registered to GK? Dial-peer voice 1 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ras ... AND Dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:Loopback0 IP Address ... When peer 1 is used an ARQ is sent to GK- it contains a bandwdidth Request and also a called # that needs resolving. When peer 2 is used an ARQ is also sent to the GK since this is also a VOIP call on a gateway to a gatkeeper- it contains just a bandwidth request though since we already did the resolution on the gateway (Lo0). With the B-ACD call we all know that we are sending the call to himself- the Loopback interface- as a workaround to invoke service aa on the inbound voip dial-peer. However the gateway/gk is master/slave and no VOIP call can take place without GK's authorization. The gateway doesn't cross-reference locally configured ip addresses for every session target. So even though the call is local GK still needs to accept the bandwidth request. And this is where bandwidth total ... 128 would hurt you since the B-ACD call will always use g711ulaw and the INTRA-bandwidth required is going to be 128kbps. Bandwidth total and B-ACD are dangerous for this reason. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:34:13 -0500 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: _vma...@ipexpert.com _ Join our free online support and peer group communities: _http://www.IPexpert.com/communities _IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. *From: *Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com *Date: *Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 *To: *Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Vic, Loppback solution is *only* used as a workaround for invoking Xcoder .Because calling from WAN to CME and then hitting AA would not force CME to involve Xcoder. So as a workaround we direct traffic to the loopback thus CME and Xcoder and then AA will come to play. Here is the proof. GK with setup of G711 . voice translation-rule 800 rule 1 /6667878/ // voice translation-profile INCOMING_GK translate called 1 dial-peer voice 800 voip service aa translation-profile incoming INCOMING_GK incoming called-number 6667878 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711u no vad sh gatekeeper call LocalCallIDAge(secs) BW 138-14 13 128(Kbps) Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr src EP: GK_TRUNK_12001 CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port 140.0.0.1 3345 140.0.0.1 3245 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr dst EP: CME6667878 CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port 140.0.3.2541720 140.0.3.25449270 Opbviously ARQ does not comes into play adn we need just 128 for G711 . This way Service aa kicking in and work properly with out loopback solution. Cyrus On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: The Loopback solution is used for calls from the WAN invoking the AA and also CME phones calling the AA- (144/128). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com * Join our free online support and peer group communities: *http://www.IPexpert.com/communities *IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- *From: *Cyrus cyrus@gmail.com *Date: *Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:13:45 +1100 *To: *Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com *Cc: *ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vic, Loopback solution is used as workaround to force CME to kick in the Xcoder.As we can see with G711 ,there is no need for loopback solution. But BACD work properly ,we need at least 144k BW on GK, please correct me if I'm wrong 128+16 for incoming calls from WAN On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: Ok- Jose got it right and this is what he was about to say (right?) What is the difference between these two dial-peers on a gateway registered to GK? Dial-peer voice 1 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ras ... AND Dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:Loopback0 IP Address ... When peer 1 is used an ARQ is sent to GK- it contains a bandwdidth Request and also a called # that needs resolving. When peer 2 is used an ARQ is also sent to the GK since this is also a VOIP call on a gateway to a gatkeeper- it contains just a bandwidth request though since we already did the resolution on the gateway (Lo0). With the B-ACD call we all know that we are sending the call to himself- the Loopback interface- as a workaround to invoke service aa on the inbound voip dial-peer. However the gateway/gk is master/slave and no VOIP call can take place without GK's authorization. The gateway doesn't cross-reference locally configured ip addresses for every session target. So even though the call is local GK still needs to accept the bandwidth request. And this is where bandwidth total ... 128 would hurt you since the B-ACD call will always use g711ulaw and the INTRA-bandwidth required is going to be 128kbps. Bandwidth total and B-ACD are dangerous for this reason. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:34:13 -0500 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vik, When I type no gateway and try the call again it goes through. So I must be running into this issue. I do have bandwidth total configured on my GK as well. It is set to 96. I'm guessing if I bump it up to 128 to allow a g711 call it'll work? Chris Vik Malhi wrote: Jose is about
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Loopback solution is required for invoking the xcoder for calls from the WAN. However here is the bit I think you might be missing. The loopback solution is also required for Cme phones calling the AA and it is for this latter call I was originally focused on. Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups Study Communities at www.IPexpert.com/communities On Jan 14, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Cyrus cyrus@gmail.com wrote: Vic, Loppback solution is only used as a workaround for invoking Xcoder .Because calling from WAN to CME and then hitting AA would not force CME to involve Xcoder. So as a workaround we direct traffic to the loopback thus CME and Xcoder and then AA will come to play. Here is the proof. GK with setup of G711 . voice translation-rule 800 rule 1 /6667878/ // voice translation-profile INCOMING_GK translate called 1 dial-peer voice 800 voip service aa translation-profile incoming INCOMING_GK incoming called-number 6667878 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711u no vad sh gatekeeper call LocalCallIDAge(secs) BW 138-14 13 128(Kbps) Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr src EP: GK_TRUNK_12001 CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port 140.0.0.1 3345 140.0.0.1 3245 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr dst EP: CME6667878 CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port 140.0.3.2541720 140.0.3.25449270 Opbviously ARQ does not comes into play adn we need just 128 for G711 . This way Service aa kicking in and work properly with out loopback solution. Cyrus On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: The Loopback solution is used for calls from the WAN invoking the AA and also CME phones calling the AA- (144/128). -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video- On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Cyrus cyrus@gmail.com Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:13:45 +1100 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Vic, Loopback solution is used as workaround to force CME to kick in the Xcoder.As we can see with G711 ,there is no need for loopback solution. But BACD work properly ,we need at least 144k BW on GK, please correct me if I'm wrong 128+16 for incoming calls from WAN On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: Ok- Jose got it right and this is what he was about to say (right?) What is the difference between these two dial-peers on a gateway registered to GK? Dial-peer voice 1 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ras ... AND Dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 1... session target ipv4:Loopback0 IP Address ... When peer 1 is used an ARQ is sent to GK- it contains a bandwdidth Request and also a called # that needs resolving. When peer 2 is used an ARQ is also sent to the GK since this is also a VOIP call on a gateway to a gatkeeper- it contains just a bandwidth request though since we already did the resolution on the gateway (Lo0). With the B-ACD call we all know that we are sending the call to himself- the Loopback interface- as a workaround to invoke service aa on the inbound voip dial-peer. However the gateway/gk is master/slave and no VOIP call can take place without GK's authorization. The gateway doesn't cross- reference locally configured ip addresses for every session target. So even though the call is local GK still needs to accept the bandwidth request. And this is where bandwidth total ... 128 would hurt you since the B-ACD call will always use g711ulaw and the INTRA-bandwidth required is going to be 128kbps. Bandwidth total and B-ACD are dangerous for this reason. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video- On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us Date: Wed
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject:[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
I always combine the voips.. dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa destination-pattern 3500 incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ip qos dscp cs3 sign then prob need to do a call application voice load aa call application voice load acd What does your BACD commands look like and what are you trying to accomplist... drop through or _welcome_prompt? Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote: I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Good point Jose If the CME is registered to the GK and you have BW restrictions to 32k or something lower then 128 the call will never complete. Even though the voip dial peer is not a ras it will still as the GK for bw limitations. Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ryan Trauernicht ryanstudyvo...@gmail.comwrote: I always combine the voips.. dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa destination-pattern 3500 incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ip qos dscp cs3 sign then prob need to do a call application voice load aa call application voice load acd What does your BACD commands look like and what are you trying to accomplist... drop through or _welcome_prompt? Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us wrote: I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers
Jose is about to bring a very complicated problem with using the bandwidth total command inside gatekeeper and how it impacts B-ACD. Chris- please make the call to the B-ACD AA from a CME phone and paste the output of debug ras (assuming the router is registered to a gatekeeper). -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:03:59 -0500 To: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers Hi Chris: Is this router registered to a gatekeeper?. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 09:56 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject:[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Voip peers I have had problems getting BACD to dial using voip from the phones on CME. I can dial into the BACD fine from the PSTN, but not from my IP phones. Here is my config: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 dial-peer voice 3500 pots service aa incoming called-number 3500 port 0/2/0:23 ! dial-peer voice 3501 voip destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4:172.16.101.3 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad ! dial-peer voice 3502 voip service aa incoming called-number 3500 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad Eveytime I call the number I get no circuit 128A : 67 12560ms.53 +-1 +3280 pid:20004 Answer 3004 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) Telephony 50/0/4 (67) [50/0/4.0] tx:0/0/0ms None noise:0dBm acom:0dBm long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a128F : 71 125594800ms.54 +-1 +30 pid:3501 Originate 3500 dur 00:00:00 tx:0/0 rx:0/0 22 (no circuit (34)) IP 0.0.0.0:0 SRTP: off rtt:0ms pl:0/0ms lost:0/0/0 delay:0/0/0ms g729r8 pre-ietf TextRelay: off media inactive detected:n media contrl rcvd:n/a timestamp:n/a long duration call detected:n long dur callduration :n/a timestamp:n/a
