[ccp4bb] CCDs + Re: PILATUS data collection

2013-05-09 Thread Jose Brandao-Neto
Hi all,

 Graeme's message tell the core of the detector usage notes here at diamond. He 
might have unearthed a can of worms or two, though ;)

 CCDs still are great detectors! I am not sure about his noise comment as the 
more recent CCDs (post 2000-ish) are designed to operate with anode sources 
(and definitely image plates have a very good signal-to-noise ratio in long 
exposures). The mitigation of the readout deadtime is arguably the main 
experimental design driver when using CCDs. 

 One other tiny little thing to bring to the surface is that the CCD images 
presented to the user are not the raw images and my personal opinion is that 
the end users should be at least aware of what a real image looks like 
(zingers, taper features, tiling) and their implications in the noise per 
reflection. I agree that filtering, stitching and smoothing help in judging the 
quality of the diffraction pattern (and crystal) itself.

Regards,
Jose'
- try other color scales! black and white is good but a rainbow pallete helps 
identifying weaks and strongs because if discrete jumps in color at different 
intensities.

===
Jose Brandao-Neto MPhil CPhys
Senior Beamline Scientist - I04-1
Diamond Light Source

jose.brandao-n...@diamond.ac.uk
+44 (0)1235 778506
www.diamond.ac.uk
===


Re: [ccp4bb] question about CCP4 scripts

2013-05-09 Thread Tim Gruene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Joe,

most ccp4 programs make use of space group and cell information if
present in the input file. The script you list below does not have an
input file (apparently it creates a dummy mtz-file with only a list of
Miller indices), so there is nothing to extract. E.g. a simple test

# scalepack2mtz hklin test.sca hklout test.sca  eof
eof

confirms that scalepack2mtz extracts the information from the header
automatically and creates a valid mtz-file (I tend to give programs a
try the way I would like them to work, and if that does not work, I
start reading the manual or check on the web or post to a bb).

Regards,
Tim

On 05/09/2013 05:37 AM, Joe Chen wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 
 I am trying to write a shell script to streamline a few steps, one
 of which is Unique, see below.  As you can see, this program
 requires symmetry and cell parameters.  In CCP4 GUI Scalepack2mtz,
 these info are automatically extracted from .sca file (first two
 lines).  But I don't know if there is a way to do this in script,
 so I don't need to type these values for each dataset.  Thank you
 in advance for your help.
 
 
 #!/bin/sh # unique.exam # # runnnable test script for the program
 unique - this will use this # program to generate a reflection
 list containing null values. #
 
 set -e
 
 unique hklout ${CCP4_SCR}/unique_out.mtz  eof labout F=F
 SIGF=SIGF symmetry p43212 resolution 1.6 cell 78.1 78.1 55.2 90.0
 90.0 90.0 eof
 
 

- -- 
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFRi12sUxlJ7aRr7hoRAurSAKDnNjVeJN0GvhDLzKmaYUX0mVUWggCePvTF
s78KpaBbPA9j4XTg4IpOjBE=
=qxVe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


[ccp4bb] Reminder - CCP4 Newsletter submissions

2013-05-09 Thread Karen McIntyre
The deadline for articles submitted for the next issue of the CCP4 Newsletter 
is Friday 14th June 2013.

Articles may cover any topic of interest to macromolecular crystallographers, 
though we are particularly interested in articles on software or methodology. 
Short items of news are also very welcome - help put the news back into 
Newsletter!

Previous issues of the newsletter, and submission instructions, can be found 
online:  http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/newsletters.php

Regards

Karen McIntyre
Scientific Computing Department - CCP4
R92 1.22 RCaH

Science  Technology Facilities Council
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Science  Innovation Campus
Didcot
Oxfordshire
OX11 0FA

Tel +44 (0) 1235 44 5790
Fax  +44 (0) 1235 56 7720

**Please note that I only work mornings until 12.45pm**



--
Scanned by iCritical.


-- 
Scanned by iCritical.



Re: [ccp4bb] question about CCP4 scripts

2013-05-09 Thread Jeffrey B Bonanno
Typo:

To avoid crash/overwrite, should be
scalepack2mtz hklin test.sca hklout test.mtz  eof eof
 ^^^
jbb
Jeffrey Bonanno, Ph.D.
New York Structural Genomics Research Consortium

-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Tim Gruene
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:26 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] question about CCP4 scripts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Joe,

most ccp4 programs make use of space group and cell information if present in 
the input file. The script you list below does not have an input file 
(apparently it creates a dummy mtz-file with only a list of Miller indices), so 
there is nothing to extract. E.g. a simple test

# scalepack2mtz hklin test.sca hklout test.sca  eof eof

confirms that scalepack2mtz extracts the information from the header 
automatically and creates a valid mtz-file (I tend to give programs a try the 
way I would like them to work, and if that does not work, I start reading the 
manual or check on the web or post to a bb).

Regards,
Tim

On 05/09/2013 05:37 AM, Joe Chen wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 
 I am trying to write a shell script to streamline a few steps, one of 
 which is Unique, see below.  As you can see, this program requires 
 symmetry and cell parameters.  In CCP4 GUI Scalepack2mtz, these info 
 are automatically extracted from .sca file (first two lines).  But I 
 don't know if there is a way to do this in script, so I don't need to 
 type these values for each dataset.  Thank you in advance for your 
 help.
 
 
 #!/bin/sh # unique.exam # # runnnable test script for the program 
 unique - this will use this # program to generate a reflection list 
 containing null values. #
 
 set -e
 
 unique hklout ${CCP4_SCR}/unique_out.mtz  eof labout F=F SIGF=SIGF 
 symmetry p43212 resolution 1.6 cell 78.1 78.1 55.2 90.0
 90.0 90.0 eof
 
 

- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFRi12sUxlJ7aRr7hoRAurSAKDnNjVeJN0GvhDLzKmaYUX0mVUWggCePvTF
s78KpaBbPA9j4XTg4IpOjBE=
=qxVe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] question about CCP4 scripts

2013-05-09 Thread Jeffrey B Bonanno
Looks like my signature messed up the script too...

scalepack2mtz hklin test.sca hklout test.mtz  eof eof
 ^^^


[ccp4bb] Codon Optimization for Insect Expression

2013-05-09 Thread Randy Watson
Hi all,

Sorry for the off-topic request.  I am considering ordering codon-optimized
genes for expression in insect cells (High Five).  I wonder if anyone could
make suggestions regarding: which companies are best to order from
(accurate synthesis – cost efficiency) and what optimized codon sequence
generators yield the best protein expression (as I understand it, not all
algorithms are created equal).

Thanks,

Randy


Re: [ccp4bb] Codon Optimization for Insect Expression

2013-05-09 Thread Roger Pickman
I hope this isn't too much of a thread hijack, but i also wanted to add a
question to Randy's : How big a protein can one express in insect cells?
 I've read in a few places that it's not size limited but i wonder if
that's borne out in practice.



On 9 May 2013 16:05, Randy Watson sigepra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 Sorry for the off-topic request.  I am considering ordering
 codon-optimized genes for expression in insect cells (High Five).  I wonder
 if anyone could make suggestions regarding: which companies are best to
 order from (accurate synthesis – cost efficiency) and what optimized codon
 sequence generators yield the best protein expression (as I understand it,
 not all algorithms are created equal).

 Thanks,

 Randy




Re: [ccp4bb] Codon Optimization for Insect Expression

2013-05-09 Thread Mathew Martin
Hi Randy and Rodger,

We have had real success using BlueSky (MA) for insect expression, I believe we 
have had around 15-20 genes synthesis-optimized with these guys. The expression 
levels have been rather reasonable too (obviously protein dependent, but on 
average 1 mg of xtal grad protein per 1g of cell pellet). The largest construct 
we did I believe was around 90kDa.

Cheers,

Mat



 From: Roger Pickman rpick...@googlemail.com
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK 
Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 10:31
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Codon Optimization for Insect Expression
 


I hope this isn't too much of a thread hijack, but i also wanted to add a 
question to Randy's : How big a protein can one express in insect cells?  I've 
read in a few places that it's not size limited but i wonder if that's borne 
out in practice.




On 9 May 2013 16:05, Randy Watson sigepra...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi
all,
Sorry
for the off-topic request.  I am considering ordering codon-optimized
genes for expression in insect cells (High Five).  I wonder if anyone
could make suggestions regarding: which companies are best to order from
(accurate synthesis – cost efficiency) and what optimized codon sequence
generators yield the best protein expression (as I understand it, not all
algorithms are created equal).
Thanks,
Randy 

Re: [ccp4bb] question about CCP4 scripts

2013-05-09 Thread Ed Pozharski
At this point you do have the scalepack2mtz output file (BTW,
imosflm/aimless is wholeheartedly recommended by this convert), and you
can easily extract all the info from there.  There is mtzdmp, of course,
but it's easier to parse the actual mtz file (hey, the records are
actually text).  Like so:

egrep -oa SYMINF.{74} foo.mtz | awk '{print symm $5}'

Gives you the space group *number*, most ccp4 programs I know accept
that in addition to string symbol.  But if you really need the latter, 

echo symm $(egrep -oa SYMINF.{74} foo.mtz | cut -d' -f 2 | sed
s///g) 

will do.

As for unit cell parameters, this should work

egrep -oa CELL.{76} foo.mtz | sed -n 1p

Keep in mind that this extracts the global cell and will be
problematic if you have multi-dataset file (which I presume you don't).
If you need Nth dataset grab DCELL record, e.g. for the dataset #1

egrep -oa DCELL.{75} foo.mtz | sed -n 2p

Cheers and 

https://xkcd.com/208/


Ed

On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 23:37 -0400, Joe Chen wrote:

 Hi All,
 
 
 
 
 
 I am trying to write a shell script to streamline a few steps, one of
 which is Unique, see below.  As you can see, this program requires
 symmetry and cell parameters.  In CCP4 GUI Scalepack2mtz, these info
 are automatically extracted from .sca file (first two lines).  But I
 don't know if there is a way to do this in script, so I don't need to
 type these values for each dataset.  Thank you in advance for your
 help.
 
 
 #!/bin/sh
 # unique.exam
 # 
 # runnnable test script for the program unique - this will use this
 # program to generate a reflection list containing null values.
 # 
 
 set -e
 
 unique hklout ${CCP4_SCR}/unique_out.mtz  eof
 labout F=F SIGF=SIGF
 symmetry p43212
 resolution 1.6
 cell 78.1 78.1 55.2 90.0 90.0 90.0
 eof
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best regards,
 
 Joe

-- 
Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
--
When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear;
Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy.
When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise;
When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born.
--   / Lao Tse /



Re: [ccp4bb] Codon Optimization for Insect Expression

2013-05-09 Thread Artem Evdokimov
You can always synthesize your own too!

Artem

Or idtdna. Dna2.0, blue sky, and many others
On May 9, 2013 10:01 AM, Mathew Martin mathew.mar...@rocketmail.com
wrote:

 Hi Randy and Rodger,

 We have had real success using BlueSky (MA) for insect expression, I
 believe we have had around 15-20 genes synthesis-optimized with these guys.
 The expression levels have been rather reasonable too
 (obviously protein dependent, but on average 1 mg of xtal grad protein per
 1g of cell pellet). The largest construct we did I believe was around 90kDa.

 Cheers,

 Mat

   --
  *From:* Roger Pickman rpick...@googlemail.com
 *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
 *Sent:* Thursday, 9 May 2013, 10:31
 *Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Codon Optimization for Insect Expression

 I hope this isn't too much of a thread hijack, but i also wanted to add a
 question to Randy's : How big a protein can one express in insect cells?
  I've read in a few places that it's not size limited but i wonder if
 that's borne out in practice.



 On 9 May 2013 16:05, Randy Watson sigepra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 Sorry for the off-topic request.  I am considering ordering
 codon-optimized genes for expression in insect cells (High Five).  I wonder
 if anyone could make suggestions regarding: which companies are best to
 order from (accurate synthesis – cost efficiency) and what optimized codon
 sequence generators yield the best protein expression (as I understand it,
 not all algorithms are created equal).
 Thanks,
 Randy







[ccp4bb] Membrane Protein Optimisation

2013-05-09 Thread RHYS GRINTER
Hi All,

A quick question if you've ever worked on membrane proteins, I'm trying to 
optimize crystals for bacterial integral outer membrane protein I'm working on. 
I'm getting some fairly modest rod like crystals in a  0.1M Tris pH 7.5, 30% 
PEG 600, 0.03M MgCl2 condition. However I get lots and lots of birefringent gel 
forming in the same condition, I get the feeling that this is Detergent/Protein 
complex and is robbing my crystals of material to grow bigger.
These crystals diffract to 5 A so I'd quite like to make them bigger and better,

Cheers,

Rhys  

[ccp4bb] 2 positions available for software developers in cryoEM

2013-05-09 Thread Martyn Winn
Dear All,

I have 2 positions available for software developers in cryoEM:

1) A developer to work alongside Chris Wood on the CCP-EM project. The post 
will support a number of software development projects (see e.g. 
http://www.ccpem.ac.uk/ccpem_projects.php), as well as providing general 
community support. 
2) A developer to work on Work Package 9 of the BioMedBridges grant 
(http://www.biomedbridges.eu/), concerned with developing a database of volumes 
with associated tools, in collaboration with developers at the EBI. 

We are looking for talented developers of scientific software. While knowledge 
of cryoEM and structural biology would be an advantage, applicants from other 
backgrounds are welcomed if you can demonstrate an ability to learn and a 
flexibility in approach. The projects are collaborative in nature, so you must 
be a good communicator and be able to work as part of a team.

The posts are located at the Research Complex at Harwell 
(http://www.rc-harwell.ac.uk/), within the group of Martyn Winn in the 
Scientific Computing Department of STFC (http://www.stfc.ac.uk/scd/), and 
alongside the core team of CCP4. The Research Complex is located on the Harwell 
Science and Innovation Campus, adjacent to the Diamond synchrotron and provides 
an exciting multi-disciplinary work environment, including many relevant 
structural biology groups.

Applications need to be made via the TopCareer site (see links on 
http://www.ccpem.ac.uk/positions.php) and informal enquiries can be made to me.

Cheers
Martyn


*
*   Dr. Martyn Winn
*   STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington, WA4 4AD, U.K.
*   Tel: +44 1925 603455 (DL)   or   +44 1235 567865 (RcaH)
*   E-mail: martyn.w...@stfc.ac.uk   Skype: martyn.winn
*



--
Scanned by iCritical.


Re: [ccp4bb] Membrane Protein Optimisation

2013-05-09 Thread Pascal Egea
Hi Rhys,

I suspect that what you call a gel might be phase separation (correct me if
this is wrong) like an oily phase enriched in protein and detergent. you
may have too much detergent in your drop.
may I ask what detergent you are using (low or high CMC) and at what
concentration of detergent do you think you are when you setup your drops.
you might have concentrated more detergent than you think along your
protein. the MW cutoff of the membrane you are using to concentrate is
important relative to the size of the free detergent micelle and of course
the protein-detergent micelle you are trying to concentrate.
too much detergent staying around is a major cause of trouble (i.e. poor
diffraction and phase separation competing with productive crystal growth)
besides many other parameters

Hope this helps

-- 
Pascal F. Egea, PhD
Assistant Professor
UCLA, David Geffen School of Medicine
Department of Biological Chemistry
Boyer Hall room 356
611 Charles E Young Drive East
Los Angeles CA 90095
office (310)-983-3515
lab  (310)-983-3516
email pe...@mednet.ucla.edu


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:34 AM, RHYS GRINTER r.grinte...@research.gla.ac.uk
 wrote:

 Hi All,

 A quick question if you've ever worked on membrane proteins, I'm trying to
 optimize crystals for bacterial integral outer membrane protein I'm working
 on. I'm getting some fairly modest rod like crystals in a  0.1M Tris pH
 7.5, 30% PEG 600, 0.03M MgCl2 condition. However I get lots and lots of
 birefringent gel forming in the same condition, I get the feeling that this
 is Detergent/Protein complex and is robbing my crystals of material to grow
 bigger.
 These crystals diffract to 5 A so I'd quite like to make them bigger and
 better,

 Cheers,

 Rhys


Re: [ccp4bb] Membrane Protein Optimisation

2013-05-09 Thread Jim Fairman
With information you've provided I have multiple suggestions for you, some
of which you may have already tried:

1.   OMPs can be fairly particular about which detergents they will
crystallize in.  Try exchanging the protein into a different
detergent/detergent mixture and then set up new trays in your favorite
broad matrix screens.  DDM, DM, LDAO, OG, and C8E4 are a few of my
favorites for OMPs, but there are many others.  This can be done using a
size exclusion column as the final purification step for your protein where
the column is equilibrated with the appropriate detergent.  This step will
also let you know how well behaved the protein is in that detergent via the
shape/height of the peak.  This won't help you optimize your current
condition, but it may lead to different/new conditions with even better
crystals.  As Pascal suggested, try to carefully choose which MW cut-off
concentrator you end up using.  Minimizing the amount of detergent
concentration that occurs during your concentration step(s) is optimal.

2.  Attempt crystallization using DHCP/CHAPSO bicelles.  You can buy them
pre-made from MemX Biosciences or make them yourself using a published
protocol from David Bowie's lab.  These have been used to crystallize the
mitochondrial beta barrel protein VDAC and I had success crystallizing
intimin in them.  David Bowie also has a JoVE article on the bicelle
crystallization method.

3.  Attempt crystallization using Lipidic Cubic Phases.  This was the
saving grace for my post-doc project.  Neither detergent nor bicelle
crystallization produced crystals that were of sufficient quality, but the
crystals from LCP all diffracted to the 2.0 angstrom resolution range.  If
you're unfamiliar with the technique, there are several nice videos on JoVE
describing it by Vadim Cherezov and Martin Caffrey.

4.  Alter your construct.  Small changes in the construct (ie: deletion or
addition of 1-2 residues on the N- or C-terminus) often led to drastically
different crystallization behavior of several OMPs in my hands.

Cheers, Jim


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:34 AM, RHYS GRINTER r.grinte...@research.gla.ac.uk
 wrote:

 Hi All,

 A quick question if you've ever worked on membrane proteins, I'm trying to
 optimize crystals for bacterial integral outer membrane protein I'm working
 on. I'm getting some fairly modest rod like crystals in a  0.1M Tris pH
 7.5, 30% PEG 600, 0.03M MgCl2 condition. However I get lots and lots of
 birefringent gel forming in the same condition, I get the feeling that this
 is Detergent/Protein complex and is robbing my crystals of material to grow
 bigger.
 These crystals diffract to 5 A so I'd quite like to make them bigger and
 better,

 Cheers,

 Rhys




-- 
Jim Fairman, Ph D.
Crystal Core Leader I
Emerald BioStructures http://www.emeraldbiostructures.com/
Tel: 206-780-8914
Cell: 240-479-6575
E-mail: fairman@gmail.com jfair...@embios.com


Re: [ccp4bb] Membrane Protein Optimisation

2013-05-09 Thread RHYS GRINTER
Thanks for the suggestions so far, I should have given a little more 
information in my initial post. The protein I'm working on is an Gram-Neg 
Beta-Barrel about 100kDa, likely with 22 strands.

I'm currently crystallising in bOG, although my next optimisation step is to 
try a range of detergents.  I'm using a refolding protocol which relies heavily 
in LDAO (one of the only cost effective detergents for the volumes I'm using), 
I refold, nickel purify (N-terminal tag, signal peptide removed) , do a size 
exclusion step (S200), then detergent exchange into bOG using a nickel column. 
The BOG concentration is obviously high 0.8-1%, which might be causing the gels?

The gels don't look like classic phase separation to me (from soluble proteins 
that is, this is my first membrane protein), they are not spherical, the tend 
to float or sit on the bottom and are semi-solid, around 30-100uM diameter. 
These screens I've set up are classic screens for membrane proteins (mem-plus, 
mem-start, PGA etc.) and the drops aren't dried up. The gels are strongly 
birefringent, but the drop is not. Additionally the conditions in my initial 
screen which yielded crystals seemed biased for the formation of the gels.

Thanks again for the help, I feel I might have a long raod to optimisation 
ahead of me.


Rhys


From: Jim Fairman [fairman@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 May 2013 20:58
To: RHYS GRINTER
Cc: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Membrane Protein Optimisation

With information you've provided I have multiple suggestions for you, some of 
which you may have already tried:

1.   OMPs can be fairly particular about which detergents they will crystallize 
in.  Try exchanging the protein into a different detergent/detergent mixture 
and then set up new trays in your favorite broad matrix screens.  DDM, DM, 
LDAO, OG, and C8E4 are a few of my favorites for OMPs, but there are many 
others.  This can be done using a size exclusion column as the final 
purification step for your protein where the column is equilibrated with the 
appropriate detergent.  This step will also let you know how well behaved the 
protein is in that detergent via the shape/height of the peak.  This won't help 
you optimize your current condition, but it may lead to different/new 
conditions with even better crystals.  As Pascal suggested, try to carefully 
choose which MW cut-off concentrator you end up using.  Minimizing the amount 
of detergent concentration that occurs during your concentration step(s) is 
optimal.

2.  Attempt crystallization using DHCP/CHAPSO bicelles.  You can buy them 
pre-made from MemX Biosciences or make them yourself using a published protocol 
from David Bowie's lab.  These have been used to crystallize the mitochondrial 
beta barrel protein VDAC and I had success crystallizing intimin in them.  
David Bowie also has a JoVE article on the bicelle crystallization method.

3.  Attempt crystallization using Lipidic Cubic Phases.  This was the saving 
grace for my post-doc project.  Neither detergent nor bicelle crystallization 
produced crystals that were of sufficient quality, but the crystals from LCP 
all diffracted to the 2.0 angstrom resolution range.  If you're unfamiliar with 
the technique, there are several nice videos on JoVE describing it by Vadim 
Cherezov and Martin Caffrey.

4.  Alter your construct.  Small changes in the construct (ie: deletion or 
addition of 1-2 residues on the N- or C-terminus) often led to drastically 
different crystallization behavior of several OMPs in my hands.

Cheers, Jim


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:34 AM, RHYS GRINTER 
r.grinte...@research.gla.ac.ukmailto:r.grinte...@research.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Hi All,

A quick question if you've ever worked on membrane proteins, I'm trying to 
optimize crystals for bacterial integral outer membrane protein I'm working on. 
I'm getting some fairly modest rod like crystals in a  0.1M Tris pH 7.5, 30% 
PEG 600, 0.03M MgCl2 condition. However I get lots and lots of birefringent gel 
forming in the same condition, I get the feeling that this is Detergent/Protein 
complex and is robbing my crystals of material to grow bigger.
These crystals diffract to 5 A so I'd quite like to make them bigger and better,

Cheers,

Rhys



--
Jim Fairman, Ph D.
Crystal Core Leader I
Emerald BioStructureshttp://www.emeraldbiostructures.com/
Tel: 206-780-8914
Cell: 240-479-6575
E-mail: fairman@gmail.commailto:fairman@gmail.com 
jfair...@embios.commailto:jfair...@embios.com