Re: SQL Multiple Reference Tables Question

2003-03-01 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Paul Hastings wrote:
>>I think that is a limitation of MS SQL Server, I can't find any such
>>thing in the SQL standard and it works fine for me in PostgreSQL:
> 
> 
> a plain jane inner join with identitical columns removed (manually) from the
> select list is a "natural join" for sql server.
> SELECT * becomes SELECT table1.a, table1.b, table2.* (where columns a,b are
> identical in both tables). sql server 2k is "Entry Level SQL-92" if thats
> the sql standard you are referring to.

I am refering to the fact that I can't find any limitation to the number 
of natural joins allowed in a FROM. The error message was "the 
correlation name NATURAL is specified multiple times in a FROM clause", 
which makes me believe one natural join would be supported, but multiple 
aren't. I find that a bit weird.
How would that work out if you are doing a natural join on 2 views that 
themselves have natural joins in their definition? If you rewrite the 
query tree, you suddenly end up with 3 natural joins and the query 
fails? I hope not.


> just curious, how many dbs actually fully support sql-92 or sql-99?

I don't think there is a single database that does.


> does
> full support imply not using things that aren't part of the standard, if i
> recall correctly triggers & indexes weren't part sql-92 (and some dbs like
> ocelot-sql wouldn't support these as a result).

You are allowed to extend features. For instance, I would certainly 
never expect indexes to make it into the standard. The only reason they 
are used is for speed, not because they have any meaning in terms of the 
data stored in them. As such, they sort of break normalization (you are 
storing whatever you are indexing twice, what is your unique row 
identifier etc.) and thus are evil in a relational model.

But in real live, I love indexes ;-)

Jochem

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: EEye Secure IIS & Coldfusion MX

2003-03-01 Thread Jesse Houwing
Dave Watts wrote:

>>I've been testing EEye Secure IIS as a replacement for 
>>URLScan. But it's giving me all kinds of problems with 
>>Coldfusion. The FAQ says that they support all versions 
>>of coldfusion since SecureIIS 1.03, but I haven't 
>>gotten it to work properly.
>>
>>To do get it to work, one has to remove all the folders 
>>in the protect folder panel and disarm/re-arm secureIIS. 
>>This will effectively disable the Folder checking that 
>>is built into SecureIIS, but will allow the jrun connector 
>>to work.
>>
>>
>
>Did you configure the JRun connector as an ISAPI filter, or an ISAPI
>extension? The last time I looked at SecureIIS was before CFMX; CF 5 uses an
>ISAPI extension to connect to IIS.
>  
>
That's with Jrun as Filter. I haven't tested it as a filter-less version.

Jesse

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: Javascript object reference problem

2003-03-01 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
Shawn,

> Sample Code - Class definition:
> 
>   function MyObjectAddObject(oObject) {
>   var oNewObj = new SubObject();

Where is SubObject() declared? Is it in both the pop-up window and the main
window?

>   //methods
>   this.AddObject = MyObjectAddObject();
Change this line to:
this.AddObject = MyObjectAddObject();

The way you have AddObject declared at the moment, it's executing the
MyObjectAddObject() function and return the value. Remove the parenthesis to
create a reference to the function.

> Sample Code - Popup Window
> 
>   

RegEx

2003-03-01 Thread Cedric Villat
I trying to do something, and I think RegEx is the perfect solution. The
problem is I know nothing about RegEx.

I'm reading a file into a variable and then I want to find ann the
's in the file and parse out the template of the cfinclude. If in
the file there are 3 cfinclude's I want to return the 3 template names.
Anyone have any idea how to go about finding and parsing out the  and getting what's in between? Thanks.

Cedric


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: RegEx

2003-03-01 Thread Ben Doom
findfirst = refind(content, "", 1,1);
Will return a pair of arrays (pos and len) which include the position and
length of the whole regex and the bit in parens.

So findfirst.pos[2] is the beginning of the first filename, and
findfirst.len[2] is the beginning of the second.

To find the next one, replace the first 1 (which is the character to start
looking from) with findfirst.pos[1]+findfirst.len[1]+1 which is the
character after the 

If that didn't make any sense at all, feel free to pester me with a billion
questions on the CF-RegEx list:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=threads&forumid=21
Where the CF Ninjas and Obayuns are happy to help with any RegEx question.


--  Ben Doom
Programmer & General Lackey
Moonbow Software, Inc

: -Original Message-
: From: Cedric Villat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:22 PM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: RegEx
:
:
: I trying to do something, and I think RegEx is the perfect solution. The
: problem is I know nothing about RegEx.
:
: I'm reading a file into a variable and then I want to find ann the
: 's in the file and parse out the template of the
: cfinclude. If in
: the file there are 3 cfinclude's I want to return the 3 template names.
: Anyone have any idea how to go about finding and parsing out the
:  and getting what's in between? Thanks.
:
: Cedric
:
:
: 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: SQL Multiple Reference Tables Question - Thanks

2003-03-01 Thread Dina Hess
James,

I'm not too sure about that LEFT join.

I mean, if you were to add a row to tblThings that contained a NULL value
for any or all of the foreign keys, (if that's possible with your schema),
the LEFT join would return the row with the NULL(s) in addition to all the
rows that have matching key values.

But maybe that's what you want.

Anyway, I think it's worth noting that the INNER (or NATURAL) join will
*also* allow you to filter out rows based on conditions in your WHERE
clause, like ColorDescription = 'Red.'

~Dina

- Original Message -
From: "James Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: SQL Multiple Reference Tables Question - Thanks


> This is the answer.  Many thanks.
>
> James Brown
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cantrell, Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:41 PM
> Subject: RE: SQL Multiple Reference Tables Question
>
>
> > This may work, you'll want to look into using cfqueryparam around your
> > passed variables to avoid SQL injection attacks. You will also want to
> play
> > with the WHERE contraint to fit your needs - you may want records that
> match
> > all criteria (AND) or you may want records that match any of them (OR)
> >
> > Use LEFT OUTER JOIN, if you want to pull records that don't necessarily
> have
> > a reference.
> >
> >
> > 
> > SELECT
> >tblThing.ThingKey,
> >tblThing.ThingName,
> >tblColor.ColorDescription,
> >tblCategory.CatDescription,
> >tblMaker.MakerName
> > FROM
> >tblThing LEFT JOIN tblColor ON tblThing.ColorKey = tblColor.ColorKey
> >LEFT JOIN tblCategory ON tblThing.CatKey = tblCategory.CatKey
> >LEFT JOIN tblMaker ON tblThing.MakerKey = tblMaker.MakerKey
> > WHERE
> > tblColor.ColorKey = #url.colorKey#
> > AND tblCategory.CatKey = #url.catKey#
> > AND tblMaker.MakerKey = #url.MakerKey#
> > 
> >
> >
> > Adam.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 3:28 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: SQL Multiple Reference Tables Question
> > >
> > >
> > > This is probably basic, since I am new at this, but I want to
> > > know what is
> > > "best."  I have simplified the tables for illustration.
> > >
> > > I have one "main table"
> > >
> > > tblTHING
> > > ThingKey NameColorKeyCatKey
> > > MakerKey
> > > --   ---   --
> > >---
> > > ---  -
> > > 001  WinterSap  1
> > >  2
> > > 6
> > > 002  HorsePlay   1
> > >  4
> > > 5
> > > 003  HouseBarn 3
> > > 1
> > > 4
> > >
> > > and three "reference tables."   The purpose of each is to
> > > supply a lookup
> > > value to the tblThing, the main table.  The foreign keys in
> > > the reference
> > > tables have the same field name as the corresponding fields
> > > in the main
> > > table.
> > >
> > > tblCOLOR
> > > ColorKey   ColorDescription
> > > -- --
> > >   1   Blue
> > >   2   Yellow
> > >   3   Purple
> > >   4   Red
> > >
> > > tblCATEGORY
> > > CatKey CatDescription
> > >   -
> > >1   Animal
> > >2   Activity
> > >3   Human
> > >4   Dwelling
> > >5   Season
> > >6   Biological Substance
> > >
> > >
> > > tblMAKER
> > > MakerKey   MakerName
> > >  
> > >   1   Mary
> > >   2   Joe
> > >   3   Willy
> > >   4   Mike
> > >   5   Roman
> > >   6   Jameson
> > >   7   Amanda
> > >
> > > I want a query that produces the following result:
> > >
> > > ThingKey Name   ColorCategory
> > > Maker
> > > --   ---   --
> > >---
> > > ---  -
> > > 001  WinterSapBlue
> > >   Activity
> > > Jameson
> > > 002  HorsePlay Blue
> > >   Dwelling
> > > Roman
> > > 003  HouseBarn   Purple  Animal
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > The values in the Color, Category and Maker columns have, of
> > > course, been
> > > supplied from the reference tables.
> > >
> > > Which I CAN do with the following Query:
> > >
> > > 
> > > SELECT
> > >tblThing.ThingKey,
> > >tblThing.ThingName,
> > >tblColor.ColorDescription,
> > >tblCategory.CatDescription,
> > >tblMa

Re: OT - Fusebox for Flash?

2003-03-01 Thread Christian Cantrell
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 12:08 AM, Sean A Corfield wrote:

>> With Flash on the other hand the Directory Structure is no longer the
>> starting point for organizing the code.
>
> It can be. Flash development seems to be shifting toward having almost
> the 'code' in real ActionScript files - on the file system and
> organized into components and libraries that you then assemble into
> movies. Most of the work our Flash application development team is
> doing uses single frame movies (so the whole timeline nonsense can be
> effectively ignored) than include one or more .as files. Everything of
> importance lives in human-readable source code, under version control.

This is definitely the way to go.  I have even had good luck with using 
a C pre-processor and another pre-processor called m4 to assemble 
ActionScript files from several other ActionScript files.  The idea is 
to include one external .as file for each movie.  That .as file has 
movie-specific code which makes use of other included ActionScript 
objects.  The pre-processing is done to ensure that you don't include 
the same low-level libraries or objects multiple times, unnecessarily 
increasing the size of your movie.

Christian

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: OT - Fusebox for Flash?

2003-03-01 Thread Christian Cantrell
Good advice.  Couple of comments below:

On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 05:15 AM, Benoit Hediard wrote:

> Indeed, the 2 first recommandations to start to write "clean" Flash 
> code are
> :
> - stop thinking procedural programming > think OO programming and 
> package
> all you class in external .as files,
> You might check www.gmodeler.com for UML ActionScript class modeling.
> - stop thinking timeline-based programming > think event-based 
> programming
> with broacaster/listener mechanism.
> There is an undocumented ASBroadcaster class, but the best is to 
> rewrite it
> (you can find a Broadcaster.as class in the Petmarket sample 
> application).
> A broadcaster would act as the controller if you use a Model View 
> Controller
> approach.

The ASBroadcaster object is pretty safe to use, but it won't hurt to 
write your own (or borrow it).

>
> Don't forget :
> - the Flash Components to encapsulate and build reusable client 
> components,
> (you might check the new Branden Hall's Outlet component in order to 
> build
> external shared components libraries :
> http://www.waxpraxis.org/downloads/outlet.zip)
> - the drawing APIs to dynamically build your interface.

This is an interesting approach.  I would think that you would need a 
whole lot of code on top of the drawing API before you could use it to 
dynamically build user interfaces as the drawing API is pretty basic.  
I will have to look into this.  I would like to add that in terms of UI 
design, Flash components are very much your friends.  There are a lot 
of really great ones out there and more appearing on the scene all the 
time.

Christian

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??

2003-03-01 Thread Dina Hess
Ian,

Replace WHERE 0 = 1 in your current query with either WHERE 0 = 0 or WHERE 1
= 1.

Why? This is just a "dummy" clause that's used in a dynamic SQL statement to
let's you move past the WHERE and on to the dynamic AND/OR statements that
are based on your conditions. But this dummy WHERE clause must be true, or
processing will stop right there. Obviously, WHERE 0 = 1 is *not* true. Fix
that and you should be OK.

~Dina

- Original Message -
From: "Ian Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??


> Pascal
>
> I removed the cached feature so the query looks like what I have below.
> However If I search for an entry in the orgname field it displays the
result
> as it should.
>
> If I try to search in the other two fields it returns no results ???
>
> 
> SELECT *
> FROM funding
> WHERE 0=1
> 
>   OR UPPER(orgname) LIKE UPPER( value="%#form.orgname#%">)
> 
> 
>   OR UPPER(funding) LIKE UPPER( value="%#form.funding#%">)
> 
> 
>   OR UPPER(commapproval) LIKE UPPER( value="%#form.commapproval#%">)
> 
> 
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pascal Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:49 PM
> Subject: RE: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??
>
>
> > You cannot use  with cached queries. Go back to
> UPPER('%#Trim(form.var)#%')
> >
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Ian Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Verzonden: wo 26/02/2003 14:17
> > Aan: CF-Talk
> > CC:
> > Onderwerp: Re: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??
> >
> >
> >
> > Pascal
> >
> > Here is my query
> >
> >  > cachedwithin="#CreateTimeSpan(0,6,0,0)#" blockfactor="100">
> > SELECT *
> > FROM funding
> > WHERE 0=1
> > 
> >   OR UPPER(orgname) LIKE UPPER( > value="%#form.orgname#%">)
> > 
> > 
> >   OR UPPER(funding) LIKE UPPER( > value="%#form.funding#%">)
> > 
> > 
> >   OR UPPER(commapproval) LIKE UPPER( cfsqltype="CF_SQL_VARCHAR"
> > value="%#form.commapproval#%">)
> > 
> > 
> >
> > 
> > No files found for specified
> > criteria
> > 
> >
> >  > Form.StartRow)) -1>
> > 
> > 
> >
> >  Viewing #Form.StartRow# to
> > #funding.RecordCount# of #funding.RecordCount# records
> > found.
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  >
>
background="http://intranet.neath-porttalbot.gov.uk/images/table_height.gif";
> > align="left">Organization Name
> >  >
>
background="http://intranet.neath-porttalbot.gov.uk/images/table_height.gif";
> > align="left">Funding
> >  >
>
background="http://intranet.neath-porttalbot.gov.uk/images/table_height.gif";
> > align="left">Committe Approval
> >
> > 
> > 
> >  ('f7f7de'))#>
> > 
> > #orgname#
> > #funding#
> >  #commapproval#
> >
> > 
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Pascal Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:34 AM
> > Subject: RE: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??
> >
> >
> > > This should work on ORACLE8/CF4.5.1 (I'm developping for that platform
> > right now)
> > > I can't make much of your error. Can you post your entire cfquery.
> > >
> > > CFQUERYPARAM is used for parameterized sql. It is usually good for
> > performence and it helps to avoid sql hacks.
> > > cfsqltype describes the datatype of your column (in this case a
> VARCHAR2).
> > You can check out the help or devnet
> > (http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/articles/ben_forta_faster.html)
> > >
> > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > > Van: Ian Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Verzonden: wo 26/02/2003 11:55
> > > Aan: CF-Talk
> > > CC:
> > > Onderwerp: Re: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pascal
> > >
> > > Thanks for your solution but it does not work, I am using CF 4.5 and
> > Oracle
> > > 8.  I am getting the following error when using your code, is it not
> > > compatible with 4.5 ?
> > >
> > > and what is the need for
> > >  > >
> > > Error Occurred While Processing Request
> > >   Error Diagnostic Information
> > >   CFQuery
> > >
> > >
> > >   The error occurred while processing an element with a general
> > > identifier of (CFQUERY), occupying document position (61:1) to (62:59
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Pascal Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:12 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Correct Syntax for this piece of SQL ??
> > >
> > >
> > > > If one of your form variables is empty, it will always return all
the
> > > records because you match '%%' (which means anything). If you want to
> > match
> > > one of the criteria you entered, this should work:
> > > >
> > > > SELECT *
> > > > FROM funding
> > > > WHERE 0=1
> > > > 
> > > >   OR UPPER(orgname) LIKE UPPER( cfsqltype="

data form limit

2003-03-01 Thread sebastian palmigiani
What is the limit on the amount of data that can be transferred with a form,
let's say a textarea.

Is passing data in the form with the ColdFusion to xml tag a way around that
limit? If so, is there a limit on how much data can be passed this way too?

thanks
sebastian 

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Cameron Childress
Always check CFLib first...

http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=179

-Cameron

-
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc.
---
cell:  678-637-5072
aim:   cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -Original Message-
> From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:28 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ... 
> 
> 
> Well, for anybody interested ... this is what I have so far in trying to
> figure out a way of grabbing the N weekday of the month ... since the
> aforemented weekadd didn't work (it doesn't account for five week 
> months), I
> thought the best way to proceed would be to try to figure out the 
> first day
> of the month, figure out what the first N day is after than, then 
> increment
> up weekly after that.
> 
> The following code is just draft/development code, not nearly yet 
> production
> code ... just thought I would throw it out for comment ... I know I still
> have one bug, but can't work on it any more tonight -- I discovered in my
> last test that November of this year throws up a first friday 
> with a Date of
> 0 ... oops!
> 
> anyway ... this is what I've done so far ... I'm knocking off the for the
> night:
> 
> 
> /* first parse out month of the start date
>  * then find out the num val of the day of the week for the start date
>  * then grab the year
>  * then reconstruct the date to find the day of the week for the first of
> the month
>  * then add the num val of the recurrence day you want
>  * then add the two days together, then subtrack 1 =
>  * you now have the date of the first X day of the month
>  * then just construct a list by incrementing up by 7 for the month */
>  
> seedParamWeekDay=6; // this would be a form var for (example) Friday
> seedParamWeekRecur=3; // this would be form var for recurrence week
> /* calculate the first day name/number of 
>  * the month in the seed/start-date month 
>  * start date comes from a form var */
> seedMonth=month('11/25/03'); // get start-date month
> seedYear=year('11/25/03'); // get start-date year
> seedDayOWk=DayOfWeek('#seedMonth#/1/#seedYear#'); // rebuild date 
> from start
> of the month
> seedFirstDay=(seedParamWeekDay-seedDayOWk)+1;
> 
> /* build a list of all the days of the month for each week */
> week1=seedFirstDay;
> week2=week1+7;
> week3=week2+7;
> week4=week3+7;
> last=week4+7;
>   /*construct the last date in the weekly recurrence of the month
>   * the idea is that the date must be at least less than 31, but since
> some months
>   * have fewer than 31 days, we still want to make sure we don't wind
> up with 
>   * something like 2/31/03 */
>   if (last LTE 31 or isDate(#seedMonth#/#last#/#seedYear#)) {
>   last=last;
>   }
>   else {
>   last=week4;
>   }
> 
> listmonth = '#week1#,#week2#,#week3#,#week4#,#last#';
> schDate=ListGetAt(listmonth, seedParamWeekRecur);
> 
> writeoutput('seedParamWeekDay: ');
> writeoutput(seedParamWeekDay);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> writeoutput('seedParamWeekRecur: ');
> writeoutput(seedParamWeekRecur);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> writeoutput('seedMonth: ');
> writeoutput(seedMonth);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> writeoutput('seedYear: ');
> writeoutput(seedYear);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> writeoutput('seedDayOWk: ');
> writeoutput(seedDayOWk);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> 
> writeoutput('seedFirstDay: ');
> writeoutput(seedFirstDay);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> 
> 
> writeoutput('listmonth: ');
> writeoutput(listmonth);
> writeoutput(' ');
> 
> writeoutput('last date: ');
> writeoutput('#seedMonth#/#last#/#seedYear#');
> writeoutput(' ');
> writeoutput('date: ');
> writeoutput(schDate);
> 
> 

> 

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: data form limit

2003-03-01 Thread Ben Doom
AFAIK, there are no theoretical limits.  Practical limits would depend on
server, client, and bandwidth (in order of increasing limitation).

How much are we talking about?


--  Ben Doom
Programmer & General Lackey
Moonbow Software, Inc

: -Original Message-
: From: sebastian palmigiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 2:27 PM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: data form limit
:
:
: What is the limit on the amount of data that can be transferred
: with a form,
: let's say a textarea.
:
: Is passing data in the form with the ColdFusion to xml tag a way
: around that
: limit? If so, is there a limit on how much data can be passed
: this way too?
:
: thanks
: sebastian
:
: 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Problem with components as session variables

2003-03-01 Thread Andy Ousterhout
The following code produces this when session initiated

Roles:
Results public Testing

and this when refreshed:

Roles:public Testing

Problem is that the write in the getRoles method does nothing the second time
application.cfm calls roles.  why?

CODE:

index.cfm:

Testing

application.cfm:




 
  IF (NOT ISDEFINED("session.User")) {
   session.User = createObject("component", "user"); //
Instantiate User
  }
 

 Roles:#session.User.getroles()#


user.cfc:



 
 
  instance.Roles="public";
 

  
   
   writeoutput ("Results");
  
  
 

 


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: data form limit

2003-03-01 Thread sebastian palmigiani
at the high end it the source would be, let's say, fifty 8.5 X 11 typed
pages back and front.

One time I tried to pass a lot of info in a textarea and got truncated at
about 2 pages. It would not take any more.


on 3/1/03 1:40 PM, Ben Doom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> AFAIK, there are no theoretical limits.  Practical limits would depend on
> server, client, and bandwidth (in order of increasing limitation).
> 
> How much are we talking about?
> 
> 
> --  Ben Doom
> Programmer & General Lackey
> Moonbow Software, Inc
> 
> : -Original Message-
> : From: sebastian palmigiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 2:27 PM
> : To: CF-Talk
> : Subject: data form limit
> :
> :
> : What is the limit on the amount of data that can be transferred
> : with a form,
> : let's say a textarea.
> :
> : Is passing data in the form with the ColdFusion to xml tag a way
> : around that
> : limit? If so, is there a limit on how much data can be passed
> : this way too?
> :
> : thanks
> : sebastian
> :
> : 
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: CFC's and transactions

2003-03-01 Thread Christian Cantrell
In reference to the quote below, although this issue is not technically  
a bug, that doesn't mean the behavior will not change in the future.  I  
completely agree that it is not optimal behavior, and I would like to  
see it eventually change it, too.  It's in the bugbase, and the product  
is aware of it.

Christian

On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 03:27 PM, Jochem van Dieten wrote:

> Sean A Corfield wrote:
>>
>>  
>>  ... some code ...
>>  callAnotherDatabaseMethod()
>>  ... more code ...
>>  
>>
>> Any database activity in callAnotherdatabaseMethod() would not be
>> rolled back if you tried to rollback the cftransaction shown above.
>
> Even worse, some people have reported that after
> callAnotherdatabaseMethod() is committed the transaction can not be
> rolled back anymore. I haven't had time to verify this myself, but you
> should check all your transactions for all possible errors that may  
> occur.
>
>
>> This seems to be bug #49953 and my guess is that you won't see a fix
>> for this for quite a while (but I'm willing to be corrected by Phil or
>> Debbie or...!).
>
> 
> Ok, I was able to find more information on this issue. I discovered  
> that
> it is not actually a bug, but rather the result of a decision made
> during the CFMX design and development process. Because of the type of
> transactions being used, UDFs would have to be able to traverse up the
> tag tree to see if they are contained in a transaction, which they
> cannot do, which is why transactions appear to be broken when you call  
> a
> UDF inside of them. As I wrote earlier, I think the work-around is to
> move your SQL up into your transaction.
>  C. Cantrell
> http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/ 
> messageview.cfm?catid=6&threadid=446316
>
>
> This would be a design decision I am not happy about. I would love to
> have the ability to pass transactions around into CFCs/UDFs (and it is
> pretty much the only way I can think of to implement this).
>
> Jochem
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Problem with components as session variables

2003-03-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
The infamous "page context" bug!

A CFC stored in a shared scope cannot reference other shared scopes or 
use cfoutput. The bug is that when a CFC is first created, the context 
of the page request that created it is 'stamped' on the CFC instance. 
When the CFC is referenced from a subsequent page request, the context 
is no longer valid and thus it cannot reference anything that depends 
on the page context.

And I expect this will segue nicely into a long discussion about how 
outputting HTML from a CFC method is a Bad Thing(tm)...

On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 13:06 US/Pacific, Andy Ousterhout wrote:

> The following code produces this when session initiated
>
> Roles:
> Results public Testing
>
> and this when refreshed:
>
> Roles:public Testing
>
> Problem is that the write in the getRoles method does nothing the 
> second time
> application.cfm calls roles.  why?
>
> CODE:
>
> index.cfm:
>
> Testing
>
> application.cfm:
>
>   clientmanagement="no"
>  sessionmanagement="yes"
>  setclientcookies="no"
>  setdomaincookies="no"
>  sessiontimeout="#CreateTimeSpan(0,0,0,60)#">
>
>  type="EXCLUSIVE">
>  
>   IF (NOT ISDEFINED("session.User")) {
>session.User = createObject("component", "user"); //
> Instantiate User
>   }
>  
>
>  Roles:#session.User.getroles()#
> 
>
> user.cfc:
>
> 
>
>  
>  
>   instance.Roles="public";
>  
>
>output="true">
>
>writeoutput ("Results");
>   
>   
>  
>
>  

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: data form limit

2003-03-01 Thread Matthew Walker
The question is where it got truncated. On the form handler template, try
dumping the value of the form variable out onscreen and see if it's all
there as a first check.

- Original Message -
From: "sebastian palmigiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: data form limit


> at the high end it the source would be, let's say, fifty 8.5 X 11 typed
> pages back and front.
>
> One time I tried to pass a lot of info in a textarea and got truncated at
> about 2 pages. It would not take any more.
>
>
> on 3/1/03 1:40 PM, Ben Doom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, there are no theoretical limits.  Practical limits would depend
on
> > server, client, and bandwidth (in order of increasing limitation).
> >
> > How much are we talking about?
> >
> >
> > --  Ben Doom
> > Programmer & General Lackey
> > Moonbow Software, Inc
> >
> > : -Original Message-
> > : From: sebastian palmigiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > : Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 2:27 PM
> > : To: CF-Talk
> > : Subject: data form limit
> > :
> > :
> > : What is the limit on the amount of data that can be transferred
> > : with a form,
> > : let's say a textarea.
> > :
> > : Is passing data in the form with the ColdFusion to xml tag a way
> > : around that
> > : limit? If so, is there a limit on how much data can be passed
> > : this way too?
> > :
> > : thanks
> > : sebastian
> > :
> > :
> >
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: Problem with components as session variables

2003-03-01 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Sean,

Thanks.

Andy

PS:  I only use outputting for debugging purposes and was curious why it
didn't work for shared scopes.

-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 3:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Problem with components as session variables


The infamous "page context" bug!

A CFC stored in a shared scope cannot reference other shared scopes or
use cfoutput. The bug is that when a CFC is first created, the context
of the page request that created it is 'stamped' on the CFC instance.
When the CFC is referenced from a subsequent page request, the context
is no longer valid and thus it cannot reference anything that depends
on the page context.

And I expect this will segue nicely into a long discussion about how
outputting HTML from a CFC method is a Bad Thing(tm)...

On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 13:06 US/Pacific, Andy Ousterhout wrote:

> The following code produces this when session initiated
>
> Roles:
> Results public Testing
>
> and this when refreshed:
>
> Roles:public Testing
>
> Problem is that the write in the getRoles method does nothing the
> second time
> application.cfm calls roles.  why?
>
> CODE:
>
> index.cfm:
>
> Testing
>
> application.cfm:
>
>   clientmanagement="no"
>  sessionmanagement="yes"
>  setclientcookies="no"
>  setdomaincookies="no"
>  sessiontimeout="#CreateTimeSpan(0,0,0,60)#">
>
>  type="EXCLUSIVE">
>  
>   IF (NOT ISDEFINED("session.User")) {
>session.User = createObject("component", "user"); //
> Instantiate User
>   }
>  
>
>  Roles:#session.User.getroles()#
> 
>
> user.cfc:
>
> 
>
>  
>  
>   instance.Roles="public";
>  
>
>output="true">
>
>writeoutput ("Results");
>   
>   
>  
>
>  


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: data form limit

2003-03-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
That's kind of interresting... I've got content in my CMS that I coppied and
pasted into a textarea on my form that well exceeds 2 pages front & back of
8.5x11 with a reasonably average font size. These are documents in the range
of 50-80kb and I had no problems getting the form to carry the data to the
server. So I know it's possible although I don't know how different
browsers, web servers, etc. might affect it. I wouldn't expect it to be a
web server setting since truncating the data after it's been submitted
wouldn't save any bandwidth (although I might be surprised). I would lean in
the direction of it being an issue with the browser and or client computer
being used.

> The question is where it got truncated. On the form
> handler template, try
> dumping the value of the form variable out onscreen and
> see if it's all
> there as a first check.

> - Original Message -
> From: "sebastian palmigiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:16 AM
> Subject: Re: data form limit


>> at the high end it the source would be, let's say, fifty
>> 8.5 X 11 typed
>> pages back and front.
>>
>> One time I tried to pass a lot of info in a textarea and
>> got truncated at
>> about 2 pages. It would not take any more.
>>
>>
>> on 3/1/03 1:40 PM, Ben Doom at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>>
>> > AFAIK, there are no theoretical limits.  Practical
>> > limits would depend
> on
>> > server, client, and bandwidth (in order of increasing
>> > limitation).
>> >
>> > How much are we talking about?
>> >
>> >
>> > --  Ben Doom
>> > Programmer & General Lackey
>> > Moonbow Software, Inc
>> >
>> > : -Original Message-
>> > : From: sebastian palmigiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > : Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 2:27 PM
>> > : To: CF-Talk
>> > : Subject: data form limit
>> > :
>> > :
>> > : What is the limit on the amount of data that can be
>> > transferred
>> > : with a form,
>> > : let's say a textarea.
>> > :
>> > : Is passing data in the form with the ColdFusion to
>> > xml tag a way
>> > : around that
>> > : limit? If so, is there a limit on how much data can
>> > be passed
>> > : this way too?
>> > :
>> > : thanks
>> > : sebastian
>> > :
>> > :
>> >
>>
> ~~
> ~~~|
> Archives:
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
> Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.
> cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
> FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
> Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up
> with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics.
> http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

>   Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/uns
>   ubscribe.cfm?user=633.558.4



s. isaac dealey954-776-0046

new epoch  http://www.turnkey.to

lead architect, tapestry cms   http://products.turnkey.to

tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi

certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: EEye Secure IIS & Coldfusion MX

2003-03-01 Thread Dave Watts
> > Did you configure the JRun connector as an ISAPI filter, 
> > or an ISAPI extension? The last time I looked at SecureIIS 
> > was before CFMX; CF 5 uses an ISAPI extension to connect 
> > to IIS. 
> 
> That's with Jrun as Filter. I haven't tested it as a 
> filter-less version.

I'll bet it works fine when JRun uses an ISAPI connector, then. Or, you
might want to make sure that the SecureIIS filter is listed above the JRun
filter - and I suspect that if one is listed for the server-wide
configuration, it might be considered higher than one for a specific site.

On a related note, does anyone at MM listening in have anything to say about
the preferred configuration of CFMX or JRun with IIS? I don't recall seeing
any documentation about the advantages and disadvantages of ISAPI filters or
extensions. I imagine that if you're using servlets, you'd probably need to
use a filter, but I'm not even sure about that.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread dwayne
If the PHP community finds a better way to interact with Flash, ColdFusion Development 
will be in trouble. 

If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web Interface, they must introduce 
an application that makes it easy to generate "Dynamic" RIA.  What we are doing now is 
like using perl and .cgi scripts to generate HTML.  Allaire figured out a better way 
to bridge  the “gap” and walla - we have the ColdFusion dynasty.   

When Macromedia abandoned ColdFusion Studio and tried to force us to adopt Dreamweaver 
or Homesite+ I thought they were a little insensitive.  But when  Macromedia 
introduced “Contribute” is was insulting.  Trust me.  People attracted to “Contribute” 
will not be the people that build RIA.  Furthermore, people attracted to Dreamweaver 
will not be the community to build RIA.  I don’t even believe that Flash Designers 
will be the builders of generation RIA.   To really make the RIA thing work, 
Macromedia, or some one, will have to give us ColdFusion developers a development 
environment that works and one that leverages our hard earned ColdFusion competencies 
and listen – “Dreamweaver MX” is not it.  Dreamweaver competes with FrontPage for the 
FrontPage sort off developer.  ColdFusion Developers are not the “FrontPage” sort of 
people.

“HEY MACROMEDIA IF YOU ARE LISTENING, HERE’S A STRATEGIC THOUGHT” 

 Please Remember us ColdFusion Developer Guys !!!

If you help us out we can help you make this RIA thing a reality.   Right now you are 
wasting resources helping the wrong people.  Revitalize ColdFusion Studio and 
integrate some mechanisms to create and manipulate Flash Components.  


Dwayne Cole, MS in MIS, MBA
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer

 
"It can truely be said that nothing happens until there is vision. But it is equally 
true that a vision with no underlying sense of purpose, no calling, is just a good 
idea - all "sound and fury, signifiying nothing."  The Fifth Discipline - Peter Senge


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: data form limit

2003-03-01 Thread Jesse Houwing
sebastian palmigiani wrote:

>What is the limit on the amount of data that can be transferred with a form,
>let's say a textarea.
>
>Is passing data in the form with the ColdFusion to xml tag a way around that
>limit? If so, is there a limit on how much data can be passed this way too?
>
>thanks
>sebastian 
>
>  
>
Do yo use method="GET" or method="POST" in your form tag?

If you're using GET that may be your problem. Appart from that tools 
like SecureIIS and URLScan can limit the amount of data one can send.

Jesse

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use Homesite+ . What
is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is practically the same
damn thing.


- Original Message -
From: "dwayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> If the PHP community finds a better way to interact with Flash, ColdFusion
Development will be in trouble.
>
> If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web Interface, they
must introduce an application that makes it easy to generate "Dynamic" RIA.
What we are doing now is like using perl and .cgi scripts to generate HTML.
Allaire figured out a better way to bridge  the "gap" and walla - we have
the ColdFusion dynasty.
>
> When Macromedia abandoned ColdFusion Studio and tried to force us to adopt
Dreamweaver or Homesite+ I thought they were a little insensitive.  But when
Macromedia introduced "Contribute" is was insulting.  Trust me.  People
attracted to "Contribute" will not be the people that build RIA.
Furthermore, people attracted to Dreamweaver will not be the community to
build RIA.  I don't even believe that Flash Designers will be the builders
of generation RIA.   To really make the RIA thing work, Macromedia, or some
one, will have to give us ColdFusion developers a development environment
that works and one that leverages our hard earned ColdFusion competencies
and listen - "Dreamweaver MX" is not it.  Dreamweaver competes with
FrontPage for the FrontPage sort off developer.  ColdFusion Developers are
not the "FrontPage" sort of people.
>
> "HEY MACROMEDIA IF YOU ARE LISTENING, HERE'S A STRATEGIC THOUGHT"
>
>  Please Remember us ColdFusion Developer Guys !!!
>
> If you help us out we can help you make this RIA thing a reality.   Right
now you are wasting resources helping the wrong people.  Revitalize
ColdFusion Studio and integrate some mechanisms to create and manipulate
Flash Components.
>
> 
> Dwayne Cole, MS in MIS, MBA
> Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
>
>
> "It can truely be said that nothing happens until there is vision. But it
is equally true that a vision with no underlying sense of purpose, no
calling, is just a good idea - all "sound and fury, signifiying nothing."
The Fifth Discipline - Peter Senge
>
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: EEye Secure IIS & Coldfusion MX

2003-03-01 Thread Jesse Houwing
Dave Watts wrote:

>>>Did you configure the JRun connector as an ISAPI filter, 
>>>or an ISAPI extension? The last time I looked at SecureIIS 
>>>was before CFMX; CF 5 uses an ISAPI extension to connect 
>>>to IIS. 
>>>  
>>>
>>That's with Jrun as Filter. I haven't tested it as a 
>>filter-less version.
>>
>>
>
>I'll bet it works fine when JRun uses an ISAPI connector, then. Or, you
>might want to make sure that the SecureIIS filter is listed above the JRun
>filter - and I suspect that if one is listed for the server-wide
>configuration, it might be considered higher than one for a specific site.
>
I tried it above and below the SecureIIS filter, but to no avail. It 
seems that the Jrun connector rewrites the url

/somedirectory/somefile.cfml to 
/JrunScripts/jrun.dll/somedirectory/somefile.cfml

This action is caught by SecureIIS which automatically redirects the 
user to an error page. The fact that removing all folder from SecureIIS 
causes the folderchecking to be skipped is a bug in SecureIIS, but I'm 
glad it's around, because otherwise I couldn't use it together with 
Coldfusion MX

>On a related note, does anyone at MM listening in have anything to say about
>the preferred configuration of CFMX or JRun with IIS? I don't recall seeing
>any documentation about the advantages and disadvantages of ISAPI filters or
>extensions. I imagine that if you're using servlets, you'd probably need to
>use a filter, but I'm not even sure about that.
>
Well the default installation adds the filter, so I guess it's the 
preferref one :)

Jesse

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



SQL Multiple Reference Tables Question - Thanks

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Cantrell
James, Dina is correct - 'LEFT JOIN' is the same as 'LEFT OUTER JOIN' for most 
RDBMS's. Some will actually require LEFT OUTER JOIN, but I think that's rare these 
days. The LEFT/LEFT OUTER is more loose - it's like telling the DB:

"give me all the records in the left table, and then if there are any matches in the 
right table, return a record for those too."


To return records that ONLY have a match with the table you're relating, use INNER 
JOIN, as Dina suggested. This type of join says:
"give me only the records from the left table that have a match in the right table"

Because you are specifying a contstraint in the where clause, the recordset for each 
of these would have looked the same in your situation, but it's better form, and 
probably better performance to use the correct join type in your statement :)

Sorry for any confusion.

Adam.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
I still use CF Studio 4.5 myself and am not bothered by it... I tried jEdit
for a while -- there are things I both like and dislike about both of them.
I had to stop using CF Studio 5.0 because of a bug that causes local files
to be semi-randomly saved to the wrong directory when ctrl+s is used to save
them. (That particular hand motion is really hard-wired for me.) So I'm not
rushing out to purchase a license for Homesite+ not knowing if it will have
the same or similar problem. But I don't really see it as a big issue.


s. isaac dealey954-776-0046

new epoch  http://www.turnkey.to

lead architect, tapestry cms   http://products.turnkey.to

tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi

certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816

> don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use
> Homesite+ . What
> is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is
> practically the same
> damn thing.


> - Original Message -
> From: "dwayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:22 PM
> Subject: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


>> If the PHP community finds a better way to interact with
>> Flash, ColdFusion
> Development will be in trouble.
>>
>> If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web
>> Interface, they
> must introduce an application that makes it easy to
> generate "Dynamic" RIA.
> What we are doing now is like using perl and .cgi scripts
> to generate HTML.
> Allaire figured out a better way to bridge  the "gap" and
> walla - we have
> the ColdFusion dynasty.
>>
>> When Macromedia abandoned ColdFusion Studio and tried to
>> force us to adopt
> Dreamweaver or Homesite+ I thought they were a little
> insensitive.  But when
> Macromedia introduced "Contribute" is was insulting.
> Trust me.  People
> attracted to "Contribute" will not be the people that
> build RIA.
> Furthermore, people attracted to Dreamweaver will not be
> the community to
> build RIA.  I don't even believe that Flash Designers will
> be the builders
> of generation RIA.   To really make the RIA thing work,
> Macromedia, or some
> one, will have to give us ColdFusion developers a
> development environment
> that works and one that leverages our hard earned
> ColdFusion competencies
> and listen - "Dreamweaver MX" is not it.  Dreamweaver
> competes with
> FrontPage for the FrontPage sort off developer.
> ColdFusion Developers are
> not the "FrontPage" sort of people.
>>
>> "HEY MACROMEDIA IF YOU ARE LISTENING, HERE'S A STRATEGIC
>> THOUGHT"
>>
>>  Please Remember us ColdFusion Developer Guys !!!
>>
>> If you help us out we can help you make this RIA thing a
>> reality.   Right
> now you are wasting resources helping the wrong people.
> Revitalize
> ColdFusion Studio and integrate some mechanisms to create
> and manipulate
> Flash Components.
>>
>> 
>> Dwayne Cole, MS in MIS, MBA
>> Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
>>
>>
>> "It can truely be said that nothing happens until there
>> is vision. But it
> is equally true that a vision with no underlying sense of
> purpose, no
> calling, is just a good idea - all "sound and fury,
> signifiying nothing."
> The Fifth Discipline - Peter Senge
>>
>>
>>
> ~~
> ~~~|
> Archives:
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
> Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.
> cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
> FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
> Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up
> with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics.
> http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

>   Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/uns
>   ubscribe.cfm?user=633.558.4


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread dwayne
>don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use Homesite+ . What
>is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is practically the same
>damn thing.
>

Well  fine, let it be Homesite+.  The point is we need a development enviorment that 
makes it easier to develop Flash based RIA using ColdFusion and Flash Remoting.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
point is, the learning curve for PHP is a lot higher than that of Cold
Fusion, and for that reason alone, CF will not be surpassed by PHP.



- Original Message -
From: "dwayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> >don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use Homesite+ .
What
> >is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is practically the same
> >damn thing.
> >
>
> Well  fine, let it be Homesite+.  The point is we need a development
enviorment that makes it easier to develop Flash based RIA using ColdFusion
and Flash Remoting.
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 17:22 US/Pacific, dwayne wrote:
> If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web Interface, 
> they must introduce an application that makes it easy to generate 
> "Dynamic" RIA.

I take it you don't think Flash MX is a suitable authoring environment 
for Flash movies?

> But when  Macromedia introduced “Contribute” is was insulting.  Trust 
> me.  People attracted to “Contribute” will not be the people that 
> build RIA.

Contribute has a specific target market. That target market does not 
include ColdFusion developers (in general) nor does it include Flash 
developers. I'm a little puzzled as to why you think it is "insulting"?

>  Please Remember us ColdFusion Developer Guys !!!

*smile* Don't worry, we're not forgetting you... We certainly listen!

> If you help us out we can help you make this RIA thing a reality.   
> Right now you are wasting resources helping the wrong people.  
> Revitalize ColdFusion Studio and integrate some mechanisms to create 
> and manipulate Flash Components.

Well, neither CF Studio nor HomeSite+ (which is essentially CF Studio 
anyway) would be suitable vehicles for developing RIAs. Dreamweaver MX 
has integration with Flash MX and Fireworks MX as well as Web Service 
browsers and CFC browsers and wizards. If you're looking for a 
Macromedia tool to help you build RIAs, you're better off looking at 
DWMX + FLMX than anything else. I use DWMX for all my CFMX development 
and my ActionScript. Then I use FLMX to create the visual stage and 
compile the ActionScript into a movie. That's a pretty good workflow.

Naturally, we're always looking for specific ways to improve the tools 
and RIAs are very important to us so we want to help people build them 
more easily.

Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
aim/iChat: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.macromedia.com/go/arch_blog

Announcing Macromedia DevNet Subscriptions
Maximize your power with our new premium software subscription
Find out more: http://www.macromedia.com/go/devnetsubs

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Owens, Howard
Doh!

H.


> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 11:28 AM
> To:   CF-Talk
> Subject:  RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year
> ... 
> 
> Always check CFLib first...
> 
> http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=179
> 
> -Cameron
> 
> -
> Cameron Childress
> Sumo Consulting Inc.
> ---
> cell:  678-637-5072
> aim:   cameroncf
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>   
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
good points Sean.

- Original Message -
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 17:22 US/Pacific, dwayne wrote:
> > If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web Interface,
> > they must introduce an application that makes it easy to generate
> > "Dynamic" RIA.
>
> I take it you don't think Flash MX is a suitable authoring environment
> for Flash movies?
>
> > But when  Macromedia introduced "Contribute" is was insulting.  Trust
> > me.  People attracted to "Contribute" will not be the people that
> > build RIA.
>
> Contribute has a specific target market. That target market does not
> include ColdFusion developers (in general) nor does it include Flash
> developers. I'm a little puzzled as to why you think it is "insulting"?
>
> >  Please Remember us ColdFusion Developer Guys !!!
>
> *smile* Don't worry, we're not forgetting you... We certainly listen!
>
> > If you help us out we can help you make this RIA thing a reality.
> > Right now you are wasting resources helping the wrong people.
> > Revitalize ColdFusion Studio and integrate some mechanisms to create
> > and manipulate Flash Components.
>
> Well, neither CF Studio nor HomeSite+ (which is essentially CF Studio
> anyway) would be suitable vehicles for developing RIAs. Dreamweaver MX
> has integration with Flash MX and Fireworks MX as well as Web Service
> browsers and CFC browsers and wizards. If you're looking for a
> Macromedia tool to help you build RIAs, you're better off looking at
> DWMX + FLMX than anything else. I use DWMX for all my CFMX development
> and my ActionScript. Then I use FLMX to create the visual stage and
> compile the ActionScript into a movie. That's a pretty good workflow.
>
> Naturally, we're always looking for specific ways to improve the tools
> and RIAs are very important to us so we want to help people build them
> more easily.
>
> Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
> Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
> tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
> aim/iChat: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com
> An Architect's View -- http://www.macromedia.com/go/arch_blog
>
> Announcing Macromedia DevNet Subscriptions
> Maximize your power with our new premium software subscription
> Find out more: http://www.macromedia.com/go/devnetsubs
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Cantrell
At least you and I learned something. What was I thinking with the dateAdd+4weeks 
thing, I've built calendars before and should know better ;)

surry bout that.

Adam.

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread samcfug
Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be given away as
a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They remain
unclaimed after two meetings so far.

The majority of our developers still use CF Studio 4.5.  Not dreamweaver, not
flash.  Their comments are long the lines of "If it ain't broke, why fix it?"

Very few of them have any plans to migrate to the MX server products, due to the
many and complex installation and configuration issues, that seem to not go
away.  It seems that with the updates, new issues are introduced.

CF 5.0, an Allaire product, still remains stable and viable for Dynamic data
driven web sites.

=
Douglas White
group Manager
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.samcfug.org
=


| >don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use Homesite+ . What
| >is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is practically the same
| >damn thing.
| >
|
| Well  fine, let it be Homesite+.  The point is we need a development
enviorment that makes it easier to develop Flash based RIA using ColdFusion and
Flash Remoting.

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Owens, Howard
That's why I come to the list and value the list ... great place to learn
stuff.

Just wish this time I had learned a little faster :-)

H.


> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Cantrell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 5:20 PM
> To:   CF-Talk
> Subject:  anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ... 
> 
> At least you and I learned something. What was I thinking with the
> dateAdd+4weeks thing, I've built calendars before and should know better
> ;)
> 
> surry bout that.
> 
> Adam.
> 
>   
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Owens, Howard
Oops, found a problem with this UDF ...

It give you the option of feeding in a 5 for the Nth recurrence, which 5, as
I take it, should equal 'last' ... meaning, say, the Last Friday of the
month.  Some months that will be the 5th Friday, some months the 4th.

So for November, for example, the UDF returns -1 instead of the 28th.

H.


> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 11:28 AM
> To:   CF-Talk
> Subject:  RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year
> ... 
> 
> Always check CFLib first...
> 
> http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=179
> 
> -Cameron
> 
>   
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Dave Watts
> If the PHP community finds a better way to interact with 
> Flash, ColdFusion Development will be in trouble.

I don't know why you'd say this. There isn't even a supported version of
Flash Remoting for PHP, to the best of my knowledge. There aren't any great
development tools specifically for PHP that aren't available for CF.

> If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web 
> Interface, they must introduce an application that makes it 
> easy to generate "Dynamic" RIA.  What we are doing now is 
> like using perl and .cgi scripts to generate HTML. Allaire 
> figured out a better way to bridge the "gap" and walla - we 
> have the ColdFusion dynasty.

Well, I'd expect future versions of the Flash IDE to be better than the
present one, just as the present one is better than the previous one. But,
in fairness to the present version, it's not all that hard, assuming you
understand Flash development, to use the current IDE.

> When Macromedia abandoned ColdFusion Studio and tried to 
> force us to adopt Dreamweaver or Homesite+ I thought they 
> were a little insensitive. But when  Macromedia introduced 
> "Contribute" is was insulting. Trust me. People attracted 
> to "Contribute" will not be the people that build RIA.

I would hope not. Contribute isn't designed for developers; it isn't
intended for developers. It's intended to allow people who don't know HTML
to contribute content to static web sites.
  
> Furthermore, people attracted to Dreamweaver will not be the 
> community to build RIA. I don't even believe that Flash 
> Designers will be the builders of generation RIA. 

Maybe not Flash "designers", but certainly Flash developers will be building
these things. To build workable, useful Flash interfaces, you need to know
Flash, which is significantly different from ColdFusion.

> To really make the RIA thing work, Macromedia, or some one, 
> will have to give us ColdFusion developers a development 
> environment that works and one that leverages our hard 
> earned ColdFusion competencies and listen - "Dreamweaver 
> MX" is not it. Dreamweaver competes with FrontPage for the 
> FrontPage sort off developer. ColdFusion Developers are not 
> the "FrontPage" sort of people.

First, to make the RIA thing work, you won't be able to just "leverage
[your] hard earned ColdFusion competencies". You'll have to learn something
new, and significantly different, from CF. You'll have to learn Flash, which
is different from CF in some of the same ways that Visual Basic is different
from batch programming. Macromedia can improve the Flash IDE, and I suppose
they will, but that's not going to magically make us all competent Flash
programmers.

And to elaborate on this theme a bit, I think this is the "dirty little
secret" of the RIA idea. Macromedia has a wonderful course, "Developing Rich
Internet Applications", which is aimed at CF developers, to teach them how
to build form interfaces in Flash. However, taking this course isn't going
to just enable you to build good, complex, production-quality Flash
interfaces - you still have to learn that non-trivial stuff by learning how
to design and program in Flash. You're not going to be able to apply much of
your CF knowledge to learn this stuff, either, since it's fundamentally
different.

Finally, I think it's a bit off the mark to compare Dreamweaver and
FrontPage. FrontPage is certainly not intended for developers; Dreamweaver
is. Lots of people don't like it - I have my own reservations with it at
times - but since Macromedia intends it to be a developers' tool, they will
almost certainly add the features that developers want. As I use it more and
more, I keep finding new useful features in it, and am becoming more
satisfied with it myself.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Mike Chambers
You can use external editors (such as Homesite plus) to edit your
ActionScript for Flash Applications.

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: "dwayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> >don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use Homesite+ .
What
> >is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is practically the same
> >damn thing.
> >
>
> Well  fine, let it be Homesite+.  The point is we need a development
enviorment that makes it easier to develop Flash based RIA using ColdFusion
and Flash Remoting.

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Mike Chambers
Did you show / demo Contribute? I spoke at the bacfug meeting the other
night, and we showed Contribute (almost as an after thought) and people were
interested once they realized what it did.

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message -
From: "samcfug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be given
away as
> a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They remain
> unclaimed after two meetings so far.

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Owens, Howard
Here, I changed this:

//If the result is greater than days in month or less than 1, return -1
  if(TheDayInMonth gt DaysInMonth(CreateDate(TheYear,TheMonth,1)) OR
TheDayInMonth lt 1){
return -1;
  }
  else{
return TheDayInMonth;


to this:

//If the result is greater than days in month or less than 1, return -1
  if(TheDayInMonth gt DaysInMonth(CreateDate(TheYear,TheMonth,1)) OR
TheDayInMonth lt 1){
return TheDayInMonth - 7;
  }
  else{
return TheDayInMonth;

So far, seems to fix it.

H.


> -Original Message-
> From: Owens, Howard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 6:50 PM
> To:   CF-Talk
> Subject:  RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year
> ... 
> 
> Oops, found a problem with this UDF ...
> 
> It give you the option of feeding in a 5 for the Nth recurrence, which 5,
> as
> I take it, should equal 'last' ... meaning, say, the Last Friday of the
> month.  Some months that will be the 5th Friday, some months the 4th.
> 
> So for November, for example, the UDF returns -1 instead of the 28th.
> 
> H.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   Cameron Childress [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:   Saturday, March 01, 2003 11:28 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject:RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year
> > ... 
> > 
> > Always check CFLib first...
> > 
> > http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=179
> > 
> > -Cameron
> > 
> > 
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 18:23 US/Pacific, samcfug wrote:
> Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be 
> given away as
> a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They 
> remain
> unclaimed after two meetings so far.

By contrast, Mike Chambers and Christian Cantrell offered Contribute at 
BACFUG and there was quite a bit of interest. It all depends on what 
you need. I'm an ardent fan of Contribute because we have a large 
number of project mini-sites that are pure HTML. It's very, very easy 
to manage these with a simple "browse'n'edit" application like 
Contribute. Until I moved from Windows to Mac, I kept Contribute open 
all the time and worked on drafts when I was offline and used to update 
websites whenever I thought of something to add.

> The majority of our developers still use CF Studio 4.5.  Not 
> dreamweaver, not
> flash.  Their comments are long the lines of "If it ain't broke, why 
> fix it?"

And that's a perfectly reasonable position. Naturally, we'd like 
everyone to upgrade, but in reality, it doesn't happen very quickly for 
certain types of products. Typically with software, about 30% of your 
market upgrades immediately every time and 30% never upgrades (or takes 
forever to do it). The middle 40% may or may not upgrade.

> Very few of them have any plans to migrate to the MX server products, 
> due to the
> many and complex installation and configuration issues, that seem to 
> not go
> away.  It seems that with the updates, new issues are introduced.

Server product upgrades are usually much more complex to deal with than 
desktop tools. A lot of CFers seem to still be on 4.5 or even 4.0 and 
many have no immediate plans to upgrade. As for the "complex" issues - 
I think that's just a tradeoff that comes naturally with increased 
power and capability. J2EE servers have many more 'tweakable' 
parameters that CF has historically had. In order to gain the 
flexibility and benefits of moving to a J2EE platform, you have to 
accept some increased complexity (see, for example, several of the 
entries in my blog discussing CFMX for J2EE configuration scenarios).

> CF 5.0, an Allaire product, still remains stable and viable for 
> Dynamic data
> driven web sites.

Technically it is a Macromedia product - it shipped after the merger - 
but I understand your point. However, you should remember that CFMX nee 
"Neo" started life long before Macromedia bought Allaire and it was the 
same team of developers and QA folks that continued to work on it after 
the merger. You could just as accurately describe CFMX as an Allaire 
product. But then the Allaire-good, Macromedia-bad argument would lose 
some of its impact :)

Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
aim/iChat: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.macromedia.com/go/arch_blog

Announcing Macromedia DevNet Subscriptions
Maximize your power with our new premium software subscription
Find out more: http://www.macromedia.com/go/devnetsubs

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread John Quarto-vonTivadar
> point is, the learning curve for PHP is a lot higher than that of Cold
> Fusion, and for that reason alone, CF will not be surpassed by PHP.
>


Michael,

if that were the only deciding factor then how come there are 10 ASP
developers for each CF developer? And why aren't we all out using Macs?


clearly "learning curve" can only be credited as a contributing factor in
market acceptance, not as its deciding factor

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 19:00 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote:
> I don't know why you'd say this. There isn't even a supported version 
> of
> Flash Remoting for PHP, to the best of my knowledge.

There's an Open Source project but you don't call the server-side 
methods the same way as you do for 'real' Flash Remoting as far as I 
can tell. I need to do a little more experimentation with it to decide. 
When I first downloaded the code from sourceforge it didn't even work 
with Mac clients (ironic since an earlier version of the code *did* 
before it became an Open Source effort).

> There aren't any great
> development tools specifically for PHP that aren't available for CF.

I use DWMX for all my PHP development. It's about the best thing I've 
found so far. A little ironic, if you ask me :)

DevNet has a great set of articles on developing PHP applications:

http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/topics/php.html

> in fairness to the present version, it's not all that hard, assuming 
> you
> understand Flash development, to use the current IDE.

...and it is light years better than Flash 5! I couldn't get anything 
done in Flash 5. It was only when Flash MX came out that I was finally 
able to create Flash movies.

> Maybe not Flash "designers", but certainly Flash developers will be 
> building
> these things. To build workable, useful Flash interfaces, you need to 
> know
> Flash, which is significantly different from ColdFusion.

Yes, and dare I say much more demanding than ColdFusion. You really 
need to understand OO principles pretty well to be a decent Flash 
developer. And understanding such principles allows you to use CFMX 
much more effectively too, IMO, because you can see how to fully take 
advantage of CFCs.

> Finally, I think it's a bit off the mark to compare Dreamweaver and
> FrontPage. FrontPage is certainly not intended for developers; 
> Dreamweaver
> is.

And, perhaps more to the point, FrontPage tends to lock you into 
Internet Explorer whereas Dreamweaver lets you build cross-platform, 
standards-compliant websites (and helps you do so).

> As I use it more and
> more, I keep finding new useful features in it, and am becoming more
> satisfied with it myself.

For a short while I switched from DWMX (6.0) to jEdit for CF 
development. Once the 6.1 update came out, I switched back and haven't 
used jEdit since. I consider myself a pretty demanding software 
engineer and, whilst DWMX isn't perfect, I find it to be a very good 
development tool for CF (and PHP!).

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Dave Lyons
I'll take them:)
see for me they would work out nice, as i make sites for my real estate
agents, they can change there info when needed without buggin me too do it.
And since i dont charge them for the sites, I'd rather not be changing there
stuff all the time. I havent tried contribute yet but that along with the
dynamic parts will save me a lot of headaches.

as far as the original gripe.
If you are too good or proud to use dreamweaver then go use notepad;)

dave
- Original Message -
From: "samcfug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be given
away as
> a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They remain
> unclaimed after two meetings so far.
>
> The majority of our developers still use CF Studio 4.5.  Not dreamweaver,
not
> flash.  Their comments are long the lines of "If it ain't broke, why fix
it?"
>
> Very few of them have any plans to migrate to the MX server products, due
to the
> many and complex installation and configuration issues, that seem to not
go
> away.  It seems that with the updates, new issues are introduced.
>
> CF 5.0, an Allaire product, still remains stable and viable for Dynamic
data
> driven web sites.
>
> =
> Douglas White
> group Manager
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.samcfug.org
> =
>
>
> | >don't be ridiculous. there is no need for CF Studio... use Homesite+ .
What
> | >is the big fuss with no more CF Studio? Homesite+ is practically the
same
> | >damn thing.
> | >
> |
> | Well  fine, let it be Homesite+.  The point is we need a development
> enviorment that makes it easier to develop Flash based RIA using
ColdFusion and
> Flash Remoting.
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
good point.

All I am saying is that CF is comparatively easier to learn and use


- Original Message -
From: "John Quarto-vonTivadar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> > point is, the learning curve for PHP is a lot higher than that of Cold
> > Fusion, and for that reason alone, CF will not be surpassed by PHP.
> >
>
>
> Michael,
>
> if that were the only deciding factor then how come there are 10 ASP
> developers for each CF developer? And why aren't we all out using Macs?
>
>
> clearly "learning curve" can only be credited as a contributing factor in
> market acceptance, not as its deciding factor
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Modifying Tag Insight

2003-03-01 Thread Ewok
Hi, I saw this post and started playing around with the files myself  : )
actually...I went nuts and made about 15 new entries to the taglist.dat and
created .vtm's to match heh

anywayeverything is going well. I just wondered if you knew anything
about this one

When i type "<" in studio 5, my tag list pops up with all my new tags in it,
all my new entries start with "cf_"
so..if i hit the "c" key it moves down to the first entry that starts with a
"c" then "f" then "_" etc...

but it will not go past the first entry that starts with cf_

say i have thse in my list...
cf_inputfilter
cf_trimtext
cf_reuseform


If  I type "cf_" it moves to cf_inputfilter and highlights it...cool
but if I type "cf_t"   cf_inputfilter is still highlighted.
if i rename the tags, removing the "_" and edit the files accordingly it
works fine. Any idea why?

I must be really bored to be doing all this, yesbut not bored enough to
rename all my tags and edit all my existing apps  : )



- Original Message -
From: "Mike Townend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: Modifying Tag Insight


> Ahh... I see where ya coming from now...
>
> I havnt done that yet... But my best guess would be to play with the
> "Homesite\Extensions\TagDefs\HTML\Form.vtm" file as this builds the dialog
> for the tag... It *might* be whats pinged by homesite for the taginsight
>
> Remember to back the file up tho...
>
>
>
>
> Mikey
>
> =
> http://www.phonebin.com
> "From Phone to Web in minutes"
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Critz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 12:54
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Modifying Tag Insight
>
>
> oi Mike!!
>
> how would I go about adding autoComplete="OFF/ON" to the form element of
> taginsight?
>
> Critz
>
>
>
>
> 
> Tuesday, February 25, 2003, 7:04:11 AM, you wrote:
>
> MT> Yup, the tag insights and auto completions are stored in two
> MT> files...
>
> MT> Taglist.dat and tagcomp.dat from the UserData directory of the
> MT> homsite/studio install
>
> MT> Open them in notepad and simply add them
>
>
>
>
>
> MT> Mikey
>
> MT> =
> MT> http://www.phonebin.com
> MT> "From Phone to Web in minutes"
>
>
> MT> -Original Message-
> MT> From: Critz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MT> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 12:01
> MT> To: CF-Talk
> MT> Subject: Modifying Tag Insight
>
>
> MT> oi CF-Talk,!!
>
> MT>   Is there anyway, I can add items to the tag insights that pop up in
> MT> homesite+/studio?
>
>
> MT>   Critz
>
>
> MT> ---
> MT> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
> MT>
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Christian Cantrell
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 09:23 PM, samcfug wrote:

> Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be 
> given away as
> a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They 
> remain
> unclaimed after two meetings so far.

If nobody wants them, you should send them to bacfug coordinator.  Mike 
Chambers and I demoed Contribute last Thursday and people were very 
interested.

Christian

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Dave Lyons
there are a few people in the Louisville usergroup that are interested as
well


- Original Message -
From: "Christian Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 09:23 PM, samcfug wrote:
>
> > Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be
> > given away as
> > a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They
> > remain
> > unclaimed after two meetings so far.
>
> If nobody wants them, you should send them to bacfug coordinator.  Mike
> Chambers and I demoed Contribute last Thursday and people were very
> interested.
>
> Christian
>
> 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 17:22 US/Pacific, dwayne
> wrote:
>> If Flash is serious about being the next Generation Web
>> Interface, they must introduce an application that makes
>> it easy to generate "Dynamic" RIA.

> I take it you don't think Flash MX is a suitable authoring
> environment for Flash movies?

I've done some work with Flash and I just find the Flash MX authoring tool
frustrating to work with. Unfortunately I don't have any useful suggestions
of how to make it easier to use, so I for the most part just do what I can
and wait and hope that it will improve with time.

I don't suspect he meant is was an unsuitable authoring environment, like,
"gee if I wanted to sweep the floor the _last_ thing I would use is a
broom!". But rather that it's rather intimidating / unuserfriendly for a lot
of us CF developers who are used to doing everything in a text environment.
For my part, I'm inclined to think that I might actually have an easier time
developing flash movies if given a tool (or mode) which focuses almost
solely on text, allowing me to designate the height and width of the stage,
new items, etc. all with ActionScript, "pull in" any vector graphics from
external sources and tween them with more ActionScript, much the same way I
leverage things like Application.cfm, OnRequestEnd.cfm and cfinclude now.

Granted, part of the reason I have a tough time adjusting to the Flash MX UI
may be largely because I've not read much of the documentation on how to
accomplish these sorts of things with ActionScript. But I suspect also that
if a focus were given to developing that sort of tool (emphasis on text vs.
the visual stage) that the documentation would also follow that approach and
focus on doing things with code, the way we're used to. I find the current
documentation for Flash MX as difficult to use as the interface itself (and
it's easily broken by changes to the JVM on the host machine), so I don't
really see it as a significant asset the way I always have seen the
documentation for ColdFusion.

I suppose for starters, this url needs to not produce a 404 error:

http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flashmxdocs/dochome.jsp

That's the url for the ColdFusion livedocs, with the abbreviation "cf"
swapped out for the name "flash". I think that in order for the CF community
at large to really get involved in and grasp Flash the way that MM probably
wants, you need to provide them that same documentation in the same format
for both products.

So if I had to try to give a constructive criticism, that would would be my
first suggestion. :)

But that's just the first step in brining together what have in the past
been reasonably separate designer / developer communities. And as strange as
it may sound, I think there's a lot of merit in the previous suggestion of a
Flash authoring tool (or mode in the existing tool) that relegates the stage
off to a pull-down menu somewhere or a separate window all-together as a
default authoring environment, if for no other reason than that it forces
the documentation to be changed to cater to us cf developers who are used to
_not_ using a graphical tool to place an image (or anything else) on an html
page. Maybe DWMX is that tool and I just haven't taken the time to look at
it. If that's the case, then the documentation needs to follow.

>> But when  Macromedia introduced “Contribute” is was
>> insulting.  Trust me.  People attracted to “Contribute”
>> will not be the people that build RIA.

> Contribute has a specific target market. That target
> market does not include ColdFusion developers (in general)
> nor does it include Flash developers. I'm a little puzzled
> as to why you think it is "insulting"?

Again, playing devil's advocate, I think the problem that some CF developers
have had with Contribute (myself not included, so I'm sure I'm not really
speaking for anyone in particular), is that it's seen as a waste of
resources which might have otherwise been spent on more ColdFusion Server
development. Yes, MM has a limited pool of cash and resources to work with
and I think it's important for MM not to get too caught up in "one-off" or
"pet" projects. Any decent product-oriented (software, automotive,
fast-food, etc) company of any size however must occasionally launch new
projects in an attempt to expand their market. When you do this, you're
intentionally trying to get those "one-off" projects that are similar or
complimentary to some of your existing products, but target new / different
people. The idea is that, while many _will_ fail (like SiteSpring which
didn't generate as much interrest as was hoped), every x in y of them will
be a continued success and thereby allow even the largest company to
continue to grow by attracting previously untapped income potential. Plus

I think I'm getting away from the subject. In any event -- I think I
understand both the sense of frustration or possibly abandonment of cf
developers looking at where MM is putting their resources 

Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 20:29 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> Granted, part of the reason I have a tough time adjusting to the Flash 
> MX UI
> may be largely because I've not read much of the documentation on how 
> to
> accomplish these sorts of things with ActionScript. But I suspect also 
> that
> if a focus were given to developing that sort of tool (emphasis on 
> text vs.
> the visual stage) that the documentation would also follow that 
> approach and
> focus on doing things with code, the way we're used to.

Well, as I say, we mostly have just a line of code in our .fla that 
says:
#include "Stuff.as"
and then use DWMX to write Stuff.as and all the other .as files that it 
includes. Everything can be done in pure text mode. Then you just 
"publish" to .swf using the Flash MX tool.

Admittedly, some component and layout issues are much easier to achieve 
in the authoring tool than in pure ActionScript but the work you do in 
the authoring environment can be minimal.

> documentation for Flash MX as difficult to use as the interface itself 
> (and
> it's easily broken by changes to the JVM on the host machine), so I 
> don't

I don't follow you - what has Flash MX got to do with the JVM?

> I suppose for starters, this url needs to not produce a 404 error:
>
> http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flashmxdocs/dochome.jsp

Well, we don't have livedocs for every product yet, see:

http://livedocs.macromedia.com/

for what is available today. We're looking at putting other 
documentation online (although the LiveDocs system really needs a bit 
of an overhaul before we can do that!).

> I think there's a lot of merit in the previous suggestion of a
> Flash authoring tool (or mode in the existing tool) that relegates the 
> stage
> off to a pull-down menu somewhere or a separate window all-together as 
> a

My default Flash environment layout has the Actions panel as its focus 
(when I write "little" movies I still do all the scripting direct 
inside Flash. I only switch to the stage if I want to lay some things 
out visually.

> default authoring environment, if for no other reason than that it 
> forces
> the documentation to be changed to cater to us cf developers who are 
> used to

Of course, you also need to consider that there are about three times 
as many Flash users as there are ColdFusion users but your point is 
well taken - "Flash developer" documentation will likely be structured 
very differently from "Flash designer" documentation.

> Again, playing devil's advocate, I think the problem that some CF 
> developers
> have had with Contribute (myself not included, so I'm sure I'm not 
> really
> speaking for anyone in particular), is that it's seen as a waste of
> resources which might have otherwise been spent on more ColdFusion 
> Server
> development.

Well, the Contribute team is a totally separate group of people to the 
CF server team, with a different skill set. If we hadn't had those 
people build Contribute, they certainly wouldn't have worked on CF. And 
there's only a certain number of people you can reasonably have all 
working on the same code base at any one time if you want to stay 
efficient. The argument that Contribute took resources away from CF 
server is, frankly, a very silly one indeed!

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> Well, as I say, we mostly have just a line of code in our
> .fla that
> says:
>   #include "Stuff.as"
> and then use DWMX to write Stuff.as and all the other .as
> files that it
> includes. Everything can be done in pure text mode. Then
> you just
> "publish" to .swf using the Flash MX tool.

I think what I'm really looking for is for there to be a way to do a lot (if
not all) of that remaining stage work with the AS file. It doesn't
necessarily need to be "hideously easy" the way a lot of stuff is in CF. As
a matter of fact I'd be okay with it being rather complex. ActionScript is a
sub-set of JavaScript and that's okay, so if I had a way of creating items
on the stage and importing vector graphics from say Illustrator and tweening
them all using Flash, I'd be really really really impressed. It would have
to be documented differently than all the documentation I've seen for Flash
as of yet in order for me to really feel comfortable getting into flash
heavily.


> Admittedly, some component and layout issues are much
> easier to achieve
> in the authoring tool than in pure ActionScript but the
> work you do in
> the authoring environment can be minimal.

>> documentation for Flash MX as difficult to use as the
>> interface itself
>> (and
>> it's easily broken by changes to the JVM on the host
>> machine), so I
>> don't

> I don't follow you - what has Flash MX got to do with the
> JVM?

Much of the documentation that comes with the Flash MX tool (the part with
the search form), is a separate desktop application written in Java -- which
worked on my machine for about 4 days and then stopped working all together
as a result of some unbeknownst change to my JVM that I never could figure
out how to repair. I even tried uninstalling and reinstalling Flash to no
avail. Imho documentation is too important to allow its primary source to be
in a format that is as prone to problems as that. Imho I should be looking
at html and or PDF or even windows Help files (although I realize those are
probably useless on other operating systems and so they're less useful than
pdf and html since they would result in duplicated work) _long_ before I
ever hit anything that's even remotely tied to Java in any way.


>> I suppose for starters, this url needs to not produce a
>> 404 error:
>>
>> http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flashmxdocs/dochome.jsp

> Well, we don't have livedocs for every product yet, see:

>   http://livedocs.macromedia.com/

Oh okay -- so it's coming and I'm just a bum 'cause it didn't occur to me to
check the root domain. :) Thanks. :)


> for what is available today. We're looking at putting
> other documentation online (although the LiveDocs system
> really needs a bit of an overhaul before we can do that!).

There's a feeling I'm familiar with. :)


>> default authoring environment, if for no other reason
>> than that it forces the documentation to be changed to
>. cater to us cf developers who are used to

> Of course, you also need to consider that there are about
> three times as many Flash users as there are ColdFusion
> users but your point is well taken - "Flash developer"
> documentation will likely be structured very differently
> from "Flash designer" documentation.

Yea, it's really all about the semantics and getting into the headspace of
the "developer" vs. the headspace of the "designer" -- cf / flash / html or
otherwise.


>> Again, playing devil's advocate, I think the problem that
>> some CF developers have had with Contribute (myself not
>> included, so I'm sure I'm not really speaking for anyone
>> in particular), is that it's seen as a waste of resources
>> which might have otherwise been spent on more ColdFusion
>> Server development.

> Well, the Contribute team is a totally separate group of
> people to the CF server team, with a different skill set.
> If we hadn't had those people build Contribute, they
> certainly wouldn't have worked on CF. And there's only a
> certain number of people you can reasonably have all
> working on the same code base at any one time if you want
> to stay efficient. The argument that Contribute took
> resources away from CF server is, frankly,
> a very silly one indeed!

Bottlenecks -- yep... Did I forget to mention that in my last message? I had
meant to.


s. isaac dealey954-776-0046

new epoch  http://www.turnkey.to

lead architect, tapestry cms   http://products.turnkey.to

tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi

certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Uns

Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Mike Chambers
- Original Message -
From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I think what I'm really looking for is for there to be a way to do a lot
(if
> not all) of that remaining stage work with the AS file. It doesn't
> necessarily need to be "hideously easy" the way a lot of stuff is in CF.
As
> a matter of fact I'd be okay with it being rather complex. ActionScript is
a
> sub-set of JavaScript and that's okay, so if I had a way of creating items
> on the stage and importing vector graphics from say Illustrator and
tweening
> them all using Flash,

Flash can import files from Illustrator (as well as tons of other formats),
and Illustrator can export SWF files.

However, if you are creating apps, then most of your work flow will be
draging your components (prebuilt UI widgets) into the app, and then writing
code that controls the components or reacts to user input or other events.
Once everything is working, you can give it to a designer to make it look
pretty.

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
Ok, I may be jumping in here a little late, but in my experience. (I have
been using CF since version 4 and Flash since version 3). In Flash version
4, I just did not get it. Nothing made any since to me. Now when Flash 5
came out, I finally understood it, I don't know if it was Flash 5 or if it
was some luck, I really didn't make anything but stupid simple CD
presentations (kind of like powerpoint). Untill Flash MX came out, Flash was
just something to play with, it really had no use for me, besides silly
flash ads and CD presentations.

Since Flash MX, I have been able to create some really cool interfaces for
my CF projects. Some of which include a text editor which allows one to type
in a news story (think of a blog entry) and then when they are connected
have it publish to the CF server, Dynamic site widgets, such as newsletter
signups, simple IM's and of course flash forms.

I understand people having frustrations, I just don't understand why Flash
should be more like HTML+Time or SVG. I think Flash should stay just as it
is. The only thing I would like to have more documentation on is the Flash
Gateway, I consistently have problems connecting to it. Anyways, Flash is
really cool, once you take some time to get familiar with it.

To learn flash (at least this is how I did) is to start by creating some
simple useless animations. You really need to understand the timeline if you
want to make an animation. But if not and you just want a RIA, think of each
frame as a page. Thinking this way it took me no time at all to get a grasp
of it.

Now for CF. I love CF, CF is the only thing that I use (unless forced to, by
some COM problems are indexing server searches) for development. I have
always been a fan of XML, I have been following it since HTMLGoodies.Com
(You remember Joe don't you? :) ) first referenced it in one of Joe's
tutorials 4 or 5 years ago. I was always frustrated by CF's lack of ability
to work with XML in 5 and exspecially 4. When I got to be a part of the NEO
beta program I was thrilled to see XMLSearch, XMLParse(), etc. With the new
XML abilities of CFMX and the abilities of Flash's, I have found it
extremely simple to whip up something really cool, in no-time. It is far
much better than forcing CF to write a txt file being carefull not to leave
any white space (which is a really pain in the ass) so Flash 5- would be
able to pick it up.

I think I rambled so long that I forgot what my point was. But if I can do
it, anyone can. It just takes a few late nights and long weekends to get a
grasp of the Flash thing. The biggest thing IMO to learning Flash, is to not
think of it as you do CF, think of it as a movie and at certain times in
that movie you pause to make a request for data, retrieve the data, massage
the data and continue on with the show.

As far as DWMX, I have worked with DW since version 2 and I found it way to
cool. I could make my own options (as long as you had a great deal
experience with Java Script). If DW didn't have something I could just make
it. DWMX follows this tradition and other than being slow loading at times,
I have no quames against it. I have not used any of the new CF features in
it, such as CF studio's CF buttons at the top of the screen, they just sit
there.

If you are a hard-core coder use Notepad, if your semi-lazy use CF studio,
if your ready to simplify and shorten your programming time, use DWMX.

Just my oppinion take it as you will. Take a deep breath and jump, it's a
long way down, but once on the ground it's sort-of nervana.

My tool set in order of priority:

1. CFMX
2. Beyond Compare
3. DWMX
4. XML Spy
5. FLMX
6. Photoshop 7
6. FWMX
7. Notepad

- Original Message -
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


> On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 20:29 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> > Granted, part of the reason I have a tough time adjusting to the Flash
> > MX UI
> > may be largely because I've not read much of the documentation on how
> > to
> > accomplish these sorts of things with ActionScript. But I suspect also
> > that
> > if a focus were given to developing that sort of tool (emphasis on
> > text vs.
> > the visual stage) that the documentation would also follow that
> > approach and
> > focus on doing things with code, the way we're used to.
>
> Well, as I say, we mostly have just a line of code in our .fla that
> says:
> #include "Stuff.as"
> and then use DWMX to write Stuff.as and all the other .as files that it
> includes. Everything can be done in pure text mode. Then you just
> "publish" to .swf using the Flash MX tool.
>
> Admittedly, some component and layout issues are much easier to achieve
> in the authoring tool than in pure ActionScript but the work you do in
> the authoring environment can be minimal.
>
> > documentation for Flash MX as difficult to use as the interface itself
> > (a

RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Chris Kief
>so if I had a way of creating items
>on the stage and importing vector graphics from say Illustrator and
>tweening
>them all using Flash, I'd be really really really impressed.


I'm really having a hard time trying to understand what you're asking for.
To address your example, open a new movie in Flash, copy / paste your
graphic from Illustrator. You can then manipulate that vector graphic in a
myriad of ways using ActionScript and the timeline. Not to be rude, but this
sounds like a simple lack of time with the application and its manual ;)


>Imho documentation is too important to allow its primary source to
>be
>in a format that is as prone to problems as that. Imho I should be looking
>at html and or PDF or even windows Help files (although I realize those are
>probably useless on other operating systems and so they're less useful than
>pdf and html since they would result in duplicated work) _long_ before I
>ever hit anything that's even remotely tied to Java in any way.


C:\Program Files\Macromedia\Flash MX\PDF\ (windows). You'll find 3 huge
PDFs: Using Flash, ActionScript Dictionary, and Flash tutorials. You can
also find the ActionScript Dictionary online at:
(http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/action_scripts/actionscript_diction
ary/)


chris


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> - Original Message -
> From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>> I think what I'm really looking for is for there to be a
>> way to do a lot
> (if
>> not all) of that remaining stage work with the AS file.
>> It doesn't
>> necessarily need to be "hideously easy" the way a lot of
>> stuff is in CF.
> As
>> a matter of fact I'd be okay with it being rather
>> complex. ActionScript is
> a
>> sub-set of JavaScript and that's okay, so if I had a way
>> of creating items
>> on the stage and importing vector graphics from say
>> Illustrator and
> tweening
>> them all using Flash,

> Flash can import files from Illustrator (as well as tons
> of other formats), and Illustrator can export SWF files.

yes, but can I import files from Illustrator using ActionScript?


s. isaac dealey954-776-0046

new epoch  http://www.turnkey.to

lead architect, tapestry cms   http://products.turnkey.to

tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi

certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
>>so if I had a way of creating items
>>on the stage and importing vector graphics from say
>>Illustrator and
>>tweening
>>them all using Flash, I'd be really really really
>>impressed.


> I'm really having a hard time trying to understand what
> you're asking for.
> To address your example, open a new movie in Flash, copy /
> paste your
> graphic from Illustrator. You can then manipulate that
> vector graphic in a
> myriad of ways using ActionScript and the timeline. Not to
> be rude, but this
> sounds like a simple lack of time with the application and
> its manual ;)

Well the manual is probably the larger part of my problem. Imho it stinks.
:) That probably has a lot to do with the fact that I'm a CF developer and
I'm used to the CF documentation. But there was never a point in time (from
day 1) when I felt the way I do now about the Flash documentation about the
CF documentaiton.

What I was saying would really impress me is being able to import those
vector graphics programmatically in an AS file, similar to the way AS files
are programmatically included in a Flash movie. This sort of thing would
make flash dev. much easier for me. For instance, if I had an AS statement
that would import a vector graphic, then I could update the graphic in the
movie by changing and saving the graphic, without having to then copy the
graphic and paste it onto the stage. Of course -- I understand I wouldn't be
able to get away with updating published swf's by saving the graphic -- I'm
just talking about an AS command that imports the graphic during the testing
stage and can then be ignored in the published swf.

>>Imho documentation is too important to allow its primary
>>source to
>>be
>>in a format that is as prone to problems as that. Imho I
>>should be looking
>>at html and or PDF or even windows Help files (although I
>>realize those are
>>probably useless on other operating systems and so they're
>>less useful than
>>pdf and html since they would result in duplicated work)
>>_long_ before I
>>ever hit anything that's even remotely tied to Java in any
>>way.


> C:\Program Files\Macromedia\Flash MX\PDF\ (windows).
> You'll find 3 huge
> PDFs: Using Flash, ActionScript Dictionary, and Flash
> tutorials.

I don't have a PDF directory. :-(

>  You can also find the ActionScript Dictionary online at:
> (http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/action_scripts/ac
> tionscript_diction
> ary/)

Thanks a ton for the url.

However -- this only solidifies my point. I don't seem to have the PDF's --
so maybe I got my copy before they were added, but if they are added, when
you open the Flash editor and you hit help, when does it point you toward
the PDF? And does the Flash MX installer make shortcuts to those in my start
menu (if I get the right version)? It doesn't help me much to have
documentation if I have to dig to find what I need even when what I need is
extraordinarilly basic (like a PDF copy of the manual).

s. isaac dealey954-776-0046

new epoch  http://www.turnkey.to

lead architect, tapestry cms   http://products.turnkey.to

tapestry api is opensource http://www.turnkey.to/tapi

certified advanced coldfusion 5 developer
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=21816

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Chris Kief
>yes, but can I import files from Illustrator using ActionScript?

You'll need to convert them into a proper format first. Either export from
Illustrator as a .jpg or .swf and then use loadMovie() in your code to
import at runtime.

chris


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Mike Chambers
- Original Message -
From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> make flash dev. much easier for me. For instance, if I had an AS statement
> that would import a vector graphic

myClip.loadMovie("myvectorgraphic.swf");

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Mike Chambers
- Original Message -
From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> yes, but can I import files from Illustrator using ActionScript?

at runtime? no. But if you need to do something like that, just have
Illustrator export a SWF and then import that at runtime.

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



RE: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread Chris Kief
>I don't have a PDF directory. :-(

Hmmm...maybe I stuck those there. That'll teach me to try to respond on a
Saturday night ;)

But regardless, you should have been able to get these anyway:

Printable versions of the Using Flash manual and the ActionScript Dictionary
are available on the Flash MX CD. If you download Flash MX from our online
store, you have the option to download printable manuals at the same time.

(from http://www.macromedia.com/support/flash/documentation.html)

chris


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Cantrell
I know you're already well on your way with the UDF, but while watching a little TV 
tonight I figured I would toy around during the commercials just for sport. I was 
still able to fit the logic on one line within the loop - tee hee:



















#dateFormat(j,"mm/dd/")#


Adam.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread samcfug
Yes we did demo the application - in fact this was done via our pioneering use
of Flashcom server.  Contribute was our topic that day.
But like you said, Contribute is not targeted at Developer types, and this is
who we have in attendance.

=
Douglas White
group Manager
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.samcfug.org
=
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)


| Did you show / demo Contribute? I spoke at the bacfug meeting the other
| night, and we showed Contribute (almost as an after thought) and people were
| interested once they realized what it did.
|
| mike chambers
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| - Original Message -
| From: "samcfug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:23 PM
| Subject: Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)
|
|
| > Our ColdFusion user group was given two copies of Contribute to be given
| away as
| > a prize at a meeting.  We tried, and no one was interested.  They remain
| > unclaimed after two meetings so far.
|
| 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-01 Thread samcfug
. But then the Allaire-good, Macromedia-bad argument would lose
| some of its impact :)


I was not intentionally making an argument along those lines,  we remain a
Macromedia Group.

But I certainly have a wish list for the server products, and that would be to
incorporate into CF Administrator, provisions for making all the tweaks and
settings that seem to be giving System Admins so many headaches  such as
settings for stand-alone and multi-homes server settings, etc. Also to include
those choices during the install routine.   While developers may be comfortable
with modifying this file and that, this is definitely an area that Network and
System Admins avoid to the extent possible.

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Cantrell
went to paste this into another app and noticed that the first var should just be 
myDay, not myDayOfWeek. must have been messin with it last minute when I went to email 
it to you - it werks I swear ;)

here it is again.



















#dateFormat(j,"mm/dd/")#

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4



anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-01 Thread Adam Cantrell
damm I didn't read this one yet - mine does the same crap! screw it, I'll toy with it 
tomorrow maybe -- pft ;P

Adam.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4