question [7:12456]
Hi all, i know that for the CCNP Exam there was a unique Exam (Exam,Nr. 640403). Can somebody tell me if this exam doens't exist anymore and give me some information which exam i have to do, to get CCNP? Thankyou all for your help. Christian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12456&t=12456 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C2948G-L3 support for IP policy [7:12458]
Hi group, I have two routers R1 and R2 in front of C2948-L3 switch and a Lotus Notes server and several servers behind the C2948 switch. I want to control the traffic coming to and going out from the Lotus Notes server goes through R2 only and the others traffic should goes to router R1. Does it possible to use route-map command at the Catalyst 2948 to control the traffic as the above scenario ? Appreciate for any help. EML Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12458&t=12458 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: measuring VPN speed [7:12419]
tunnel depend upon the performance of the internet. Its hard to predict. mmhhh ! may be any software on your machine you can install and try to calculate ? :-)) let me know too if you find one ! >From: "Farhan Ahmed" >Reply-To: "Farhan Ahmed" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: measuring VPN speed [7:12419] >Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 13:48:11 -0400 > >lets say i have 64k connection on both ends >if i built up a vpn what will be the speed of the tunnel > >any thoughts? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12459&t=12419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: question [7:12456]
Hey Christian, This is what the Cisco website says: For CCNP you have to take: - 640-503 Routing (BSCN) - 640-504 Switching (BCMSN) - 640-505 Remote Access (BCRAN) - 640-506 Support (CIT) You can also combine the first three into a single exam (usefull for cust reduction!): - 640-509 Foundations So to answer your question: there are at least 2 exams you have to take to be a CCNP (640-506 + 640-509). However, I'd recommend the 'long' way of taking each exam separately. Doing the 3-in-1 is a tough one! Hope this helps. Rgds, Remmert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12460&t=12456 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
connecting two routers back to back using BRI0 [7:12461]
Hi all , Can I connect two routers back to back using BRI0 S/T what is the required pin assignment for the cable ? what is the required configuration ? Thanks sami , __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12461&t=12461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2926 or 2901? [7:12462]
Hi, Would someone respond to my question regarding the CAT 2926 or 2901? Do these routers really have the same set commands as the CAT 5000s? And if so what do these routers usually sell for? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12462&t=12462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPSec problem [7:12463]
I have a very strange problem with IPSec, namely with ISAKMP. When it is time for next key exchange between piers (one in an hour) it goes well without any problem but all IPSec traffic is droped with messages like CRYPTO_ENGINE: packets dropped: State = 0 conn_id=2000, pak=81749C44 when I do "clear crypto sa" it starts working till next rekeying. Why could it happen? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12463&t=12463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: question [7:12456]
Christian The exam 640-403 (ACRC) is replaced by 640-503 Routing (BSCN) Mohammed > -Original Message- > From: Christian Rautscher [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mon, July 16, 2001 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: question [7:12456] > > Hi all, > > i know that for the CCNP Exam > there was a unique Exam (Exam,Nr. 640403). > > Can somebody tell me if this exam doens't > exist anymore and give me some information > which exam i have to do, to get CCNP? > > Thankyou all for your help. > > Christian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12464&t=12456 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book Donation [7:12465]
Hello I am beginning to start my preperation for CCNA.So please do guide me about something relating to the subject.If u have some material online like good dumps , or u wanna donate soom books please do mail me back , which would certainly be helpful in my preperation for the exam. If u have some suggestion please do drop in a mail. Its my second email Thanks Shan > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at > http://mail.yahoo.co.uk > or your free @yahoo.ie address at > http://mail.yahoo.ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12465&t=12465 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco vs. V.92 [7:12466]
Does anybody upgrade AS5300 or 58000 to support v.92 modem protocol? Which plattforms support v.92? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12466&t=12466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 3920 token ring switch [7:12467]
Hi, Can anyone let me know the steps to configure the Catalyst 3920 for IP management, so that the Catalyst 3920 can be managed from one of the token rings ? Thank-you. __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12467&t=12467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPSec problem [7:12463]
send me the exact error debug -Original Message- From: Vyacheslav Luschinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IPSec problem [7:12463] I have a very strange problem with IPSec, namely with ISAKMP. When it is time for next key exchange between piers (one in an hour) it goes well without any problem but all IPSec traffic is droped with messages like CRYPTO_ENGINE: packets dropped: State = 0 conn_id=2000, pak=81749C44 when I do "clear crypto sa" it starts working till next rekeying. Why could it happen? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12468&t=12463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPSec problem [7:12463]
i would say if u wana overcome this problem in short time make the tunnel again -Original Message- From: Luschinsky Slava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:54 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Subject: RE: IPSec problem [7:12463] I try to establish tunnel between two routers. I send you two logs from every router. Second router first starts negotiation for new SA after "clear cry sa" then after an hour it starts new key exchange and after that first router begins to drop packets.. send me the output debug crypto engine -Original Message- From: Vyacheslav Luschinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IPSec problem [7:12463] I have a very strange problem with IPSec, namely with ISAKMP. When it is time for next key exchange between piers (one in an hour) it goes well without any problem but all IPSec traffic is droped with messages like CRYPTO_ENGINE: packets dropped: State = 0 conn_id=2000, pak=81749C44 when I do "clear crypto sa" it starts working till next rekeying. Why could it happen? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12469&t=12463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPSec problem [7:12463]
show crypto cisco key-timeout After an encrypted communication session is established, it is valid for a specific length of time. After this length of time, the session times out. A new session must be negotiated, and a new DES (session) key must be generated for encrypted communication to continue. Use this command to change the time that an encrypted communication session will last before it expires (times out): Loser#show crypto cisco key-timeout Session keys will be re-negotiated every 30 minutes Use these commands to determine the length of time before the DES keys are renegotiated i would say if u wana overcome this problem in short time make the tunnel again -Original Message- From: Luschinsky Slava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:54 PM To: Farhan Ahmed Subject: RE: IPSec problem [7:12463] I try to establish tunnel between two routers. I send you two logs from every router. Second router first starts negotiation for new SA after "clear cry sa" then after an hour it starts new key exchange and after that first router begins to drop packets.. send me the output debug crypto engine -Original Message- From: Vyacheslav Luschinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IPSec problem [7:12463] I have a very strange problem with IPSec, namely with ISAKMP. When it is time for next key exchange between piers (one in an hour) it goes well without any problem but all IPSec traffic is droped with messages like CRYPTO_ENGINE: packets dropped: State = 0 conn_id=2000, pak=81749C44 when I do "clear crypto sa" it starts working till next rekeying. Why could it happen? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12470&t=12463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12471]
Hi Everybody, This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For details check: http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm Have a nice day. Kind regards, Banji. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12471&t=12471 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256]
Best practice for speed at which b channels come up is the following dialer load-threshold 2 (dont use 1, there are a few issues, 2 = .78%) load-interval 30 (defualt is 5 minutes, this is the a moveing weighted average at which load is calculated) also to bring up b channels v.fast configure ppp timeout multilink link add 1 you can then configure dialer pools, and for each pool specify the maximum number of b channels allowed per group. ie dialer pool-member 1 max-link 10 then int dialer 2 dialer pool 1 regards -Stuart. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Farhan Ahmed Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] wrong dialer load threshold is for bringing up the second link u can put maximum numb on idle time out or use fast idle command -Original Message- From: Vette Boy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] Configue the dialer load threshold to 0 for the link to be always up. VB --- "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > I would have to say that the idle-timer is for pure > idle time. not just > interesting traffic AFAIK interesting traffic is > only used to initiaite > the dial, but after that any traffic is enough to > keep the link open.. > BUT (now that I've looked it up) I'M WRONG! > Damn I hate when that > happens. > > from Cisco's site: > > "Interesting packets are packets that pass the > restrictions of the access > lists. These packets either initiate a call (if one > is not already in > progress) or reset the idle timer if a call is in > progress. Uninteresting > packets are transmitted if the link is active, but > dropped if the link is > not active. Uninteresting packets do not initiate > calls or reset the idle > timer." > > Good call Charles.. > > Mike W. > > "Charles Manafa" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Interesting traffic will bring up the link, and > maintain it. Whilst the > link > > is up, any traffic can cross the link, but only > interesting traffic can > > reset the idle timer. > > > > CM > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Burnham, Chris > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 13 July 2001 11:39 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] > > > > > > > > > I am currently working throught the "Caslow , > Pavlichenko Cisco > > > Certification Book" I have a query on page 163 > that you guy's > > > and girl's > > > maybe able to help me with. > > > > > > It states that the DDR connection is maintained > as long as > > > "interesting > > > traffic" is transferred over the connection > before the > > > dialer-idle-timeout > > > occurs.? > > > > > > Is this correct?? I was alway's under the > impression that the > > > interesting > > > traffic only determined what brought up the link > & once the > > > link was up it > > > would stay up regardless of traffic type > crossing the ISDN link > > > > > > I would like to hear your opinions > > > > > > Chris Burnham, > > > Systems Engineer, > > > Delphis Consulting Plc. > > > Tel: +(44) 020 7916 0200 > > > Mob: +(44) 07799403576 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it > are intended > > > solely for the > > > addressee and are confidential. They may also be > legally privileged. > > > Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis > Consulting PLC > > > ["Delphis"] and they > > > must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone > other than the > > > addressee. If > > > you have received this e-mail and any > accompanying files in > > > error, you may > > > not copy, publish or use them in any way and you > should > > > delete them from > > > your system and notify us immediately.E-mails > are not secure. > > > Delphis does > > > not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails > that occur > > > after they have > > > been sent. Any opinions expressed in this > e-mail may be > > > personal to the > > > author and may not necessarily reflect the > opinions of Delphis. [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12472&t=12256 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12473]
this is too ugly i just try http://192.168.5.1/level/29/exec/ on my 2503 and i m in ha -Original Message- From: Oke Oyebanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12471] Hi Everybody, This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For details check: http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm Have a nice day. Kind regards, Banji. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12473&t=12473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Accessories for sale [7:9510]
Message addressed to Mr. Mark Rose Pls watch your mail for refund towards two mismatch rack mount sold. Tx / RamG ""RamG"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have following items for sale. > > a) 4 Pairs of Rack Mount Kit - 2500 series - USD.7 Each > > b) Two 4MB Flash Intel - 2500 series - USD.20 Each > > c) 4 Black Box Media Filters - USD.6 Each > > d) 1 Type 3 Media Filter - USD.6 > > e) 4 LAN UPT Cat 5 Patch Cable - USD.2 Each > > If it interests anybody contact me directly. Pls note shipping will be > extra. > > TX / RamG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12474&t=9510 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please help!!!!!!!!!! ARP Cache [7:12475]
Hi Everybody, I need some help on this issue.. I am having Cisco 3600 router with some 16 Class-C connected to the Fast Ethernet as secondary addresses. My host were not able to ping the router across the ethernetat all... I was seeing the ARP entry of my host on the router but not able to ping the host from the router and vice-versa across the ethernet..when i cleared the arp-cache everything is working...( Notsure when the trouble may come back) Can somebody tell 1) What is the size of the ARP-CACHE, where i can see it and how i can manipulate it. 2) If i have "n" hosts and "n" is the maximum hosts the Arp-cache can accomidate when "n+1" host try to get to a host it will send a brodcast and get the MAC and get itself into the ARP-Cache removing the oldest entry in the ARP right? Apparently this does NOT seem to be happening.. Is my understanding wrong or is this a weird cisco IOS stuff! which needs the regular upgrade Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks Satish _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12475&t=12475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256]
Thankx Mike. VetteBoy --- "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > I think what he was saying is that if you configure > the load threshold to 0 > that the "other" links (i.e. the second BRI line in > a Dialer group or other > PPP multilink) would come up automaticall and stay > up the entire time. Then > as long as there is interesting traffic to reset the > idle timer, the other > links will also stay up. The fast idle command > should only have any bearing > when there are other calls waiting to be > placed.. > > Mike W. > > "Farhan Ahmed" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > wrong dialer load threshold is for bringing up the > second link > > u can put maximum numb on idle time out or use > fast idle command > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vette Boy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:18 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] > > > > > > Configue the dialer load threshold to 0 for the > link > > to be always up. > > > > VB > > > > --- "Michael L. Williams" > > wrote: > > > I would have to say that the idle-timer is for > pure > > > idle time. not just > > > interesting traffic AFAIK interesting > traffic is > > > only used to initiaite > > > the dial, but after that any traffic is enough > to > > > keep the link open.. > > > BUT (now that I've looked it up) I'M WRONG! > > > Damn I hate when that > > > happens. > > > > > > from Cisco's site: > > > > > > "Interesting packets are packets that pass the > > > restrictions of the access > > > lists. These packets either initiate a call (if > one > > > is not already in > > > progress) or reset the idle timer if a call is > in > > > progress. Uninteresting > > > packets are transmitted if the link is active, > but > > > dropped if the link is > > > not active. Uninteresting packets do not > initiate > > > calls or reset the idle > > > timer." > > > > > > Good call Charles.. > > > > > > Mike W. > > > > > > "Charles Manafa" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Interesting traffic will bring up the link, > and > > > maintain it. Whilst the > > > link > > > > is up, any traffic can cross the link, but > only > > > interesting traffic can > > > > reset the idle timer. > > > > > > > > CM > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Burnham, Chris > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: 13 July 2001 11:39 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: dialer idle-timeout [7:12256] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am currently working throught the "Caslow > , > > > Pavlichenko Cisco > > > > > Certification Book" I have a query on page > 163 > > > that you guy's > > > > > and girl's > > > > > maybe able to help me with. > > > > > > > > > > It states that the DDR connection is > maintained > > > as long as > > > > > "interesting > > > > > traffic" is transferred over the connection > > > before the > > > > > dialer-idle-timeout > > > > > occurs.? > > > > > > > > > > Is this correct?? I was alway's under the > > > impression that the > > > > > interesting > > > > > traffic only determined what brought up the > link > > > & once the > > > > > link was up it > > > > > would stay up regardless of traffic type > > > crossing the ISDN link > > > > > > > > > > I would like to hear your opinions > > > > > > > > > > Chris Burnham, > > > > > Systems Engineer, > > > > > Delphis Consulting Plc. > > > > > Tel: +(44) 020 7916 0200 > > > > > Mob: +(44) 07799403576 > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with > it > > > are intended > > > > > solely for the > > > > > addressee and are confidential. They may > also be > > > legally privileged. > > > > > Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis > > > Consulting PLC > > > > > ["Delphis"] and they > > > > > must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone > > > other than the > > > > > addressee. If > > > > > you have received this e-mail and any > > > accompanying files in > > > > > error, you may > > > > > not copy, publish or use them in any way and > you > > > should > > > > > delete them from > > > > > your system and notify us > immediately.E-mails > > > are not secure. > > > > > Delphis does > > > > > not accept responsibility for changes to > e-mails > > > that occur > > > > > after they have > > > > > been sent. Any opinions expressed in this > > > e-mail may be > > > > > personal to the > > > > > author and may not necessarily reflect the > > > opinions of Delphis. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/fo
Source Quench [7:12477]
Hi All, I am getting a " Source Quench message " from one of my HP-UX Servers when I try to ping it from an NT machine / Switch I am getting the following msg when I ping the server from the external router Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x timeout is 2 seconds: Q However if I ping the same server from a Unix machine / server, it is ok. Could it be a problem with the server NIC Thanks & Regards Amit __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12477&t=12477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12478]
Check your MSFC's!!! ""Oke Oyebanji"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Everybody, > > This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early > this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For > details check: > > http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm > > Have a nice day. > > Kind regards, > Banji. > > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a > name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12478&t=12478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2926 or 2901? [7:12462]
The Catalyst 2900 (non-xl/non-l3) series are the fixed configuration versions of the Catalyst 5000 series. With Ram/flash upgrades, they can run the newest version of the CatOs. They support an external RP. HTH -Ejay -Original Message- From: Stephen Flint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 6:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2926 or 2901? [7:12462] Hi, Would someone respond to my question regarding the CAT 2926 or 2901? Do these routers really have the same set commands as the CAT 5000s? And if so what do these routers usually sell for? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12479&t=12462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCprep.com Lab time [7:12453]
Preston, www.ccbootcamp.com www.fatkid.com -Brad ""Preston Kilburn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > All, I have a question for you, have any of you rented a lab from > CCprep.com? I was wondering if it was worth the $45 or so an hour. Also, > are there any other places to connect up with a lab to tinker with?? > > -P.Kil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12480&t=12453 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent question related to vtp [7:11687]
having you configure VTP, but do you need VTP? (assume a small network with few VLANs) A: No, you don't have to use it, but you will have to configure your vlan's manually on every switch. Q: How does VTP interact with trunks, if at all? I can configure a trunk to carry traffic for a subset of the VLANs that VTP advertises, can't I? (not sure why I would want to, but I'm just confirming your point that VTP is misnamed, e.g. it is not a trunking protocol) A: VTP's only interaction with trunks is "pruning", removal of unused VLANS from trunks where they are not in use. Pruning is supposedly disabled by default, but I've had issues with it and always explicitly turn it on or off. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12481&t=11687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448]
Do you have reverse DNS setup for the IP address of your mail server? If not, AOL/MSN and a few others will drop your inbound (to them) smtp. -Original Message- From: Raees Ahmed Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448] Dear Friends, I am facing a very strange problem with our Mailing System Exchange5.5sp4. The issue is that we are not able to send email message to some of the sites on the internet. Most of the other popular sites , you can say 90% of the sites are reachable by our email clients. But when the clients try to send message to those few site, they get and Non-Delivery-Report saying that the mail could not be delivered. Strange enough that email address is reachable through yahoo, hotmail and other sites. I have checked our router for any access-list blocking but I am sure nothing is of that sort, no access-lists are controlling those addresses. Our ISP from whom we are connected to the internet is also able to reach that sites. But we using the ISP's DNS servers for name resolution cannot connect to those particular hosts. One strange behavior though, when I tried to trace route a website add, for that particular mail host, I is taking more than 15 hops and then declared unreachable by our Static Router, No Dynamic protocol is running between us and our ISP, we are using default route. Any help or insights would be valuable and really be appreciated. I know this has nothing to do with Cisco, but the fact is Applications, and User Usability is driving the Technology. so this mail is not so uncommon for a Cisco SE. Thanks and Regards, S. Raees [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Glacier Bkgrd.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12483&t=12448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quest on IPsec [7:12484]
Hi Friends, I would like to know whether IPSEC works with loadbalancing in a VPN..Pls pass on some good url's if you have come across.. Look forward to ur replies... Regards / Thangs _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12484&t=12484 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 [7:12446]
Hi John, the console serial port keep bursting unreadable string, do you refer to serial 0 sync/async port ? please advise, JD - Original Message - From: "DOCSIS ATP Rack#2" To: "john, Dang" ; "Jeff Theobalt" ; "Fawad Alam" ; Cc: Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 11:38 PM Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > John, > > You can recover from a catastrophic failure by reloading via the serial port > using Xmodem or Zmodem (I think). I've done this before - it's painful - > but you can recover. I'm not sure if this is what is required - but if your > router is brain dead and can't tftp - this this is your only choice. It > happened to me with a 3620 - took about 2hrs. before I was completely > back up. > > Good Luck, > John > > - Original Message - > From: "john, Dang" > To: "Jeff Theobalt" ; "Fawad Alam" ; > > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:52 PM > Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > Hello every one, > > I need help for reinstall flash program into Cisco 3810 > > concentrator router, I think I mess up the flash after > > I reload the upgrade ISO,12.0 > > any one can give me some advise, > > thank you > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jeff Theobalt" > > To: "Fawad Alam" ; > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > > > > That is because it is unformatted and there is no IOS on the flash. > > > > > > > > > Therefore, you will need to format the flash . Once this is done > complete > > > the following steps exactly to load IOS to the new flash: > > > > > > when in rommon this is what needs to be done > > > > > > rommon>IP_ADDRESS= ip address of the router > > > rommon>IP_SUBNET_MASK= subnet amsk > > > rommon>DEFAULT_GATEWAY= gateway if tftp server is on different subnet > > > rommon>TFTP_SERVER= ip address of tftp server > > > rommon>TFTP_FILE= name IOS file on the tftp server > > > > > > rommon>boot > > > > > > this should fix your problem > > > > > > -Jeff > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: Fawad Alam > > > To: > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:35 AM > > > Subject: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > > > > > > > In order to increase flash on my 2600 Router I ordered 16MB Kingston > > > Flash. > > > > I removed the original 8 MB flash and inserted this new 16MB flash and > > the > > > > message I am getting is: > > > > rommon 1 > boot > > > > device does not contain a valid magic number > > > > boot: cannot open "flash:" > > > > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > > > > > > > What should I do for the router to recognize this new flash?? > > > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12446&t=12446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12487]
This Cisco bug will BITE only if you use local account. If you use TACACS for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA), then you do NOT to have to worry about this bug. I've been trying to test it in the lab without success because I use TACACS. If anyone think I am wrong, please contact me and straight me out. Sean >From: "cisco skin" >Reply-To: "cisco skin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12478] >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:37:54 -0400 > >Check your MSFC's!!! > > >""Oke Oyebanji"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everybody, > > > > This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early > > this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For > > details check: > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm > > > > Have a nice day. > > > > Kind regards, > > Banji. > > > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had >a > > name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12487&t=12487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 [7:12442]
Hello every one, I need help for reinstall flash program into Cisco 3810 concentrator router, I think I mess up the flash after I reload the upgrade ISO,12.0 any one can give me some advise, thank you - Original Message - From: "Jeff Theobalt" To: "Fawad Alam" ; Cc: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > That is because it is unformatted and there is no IOS on the flash. > > > Therefore, you will need to format the flash . Once this is done complete > the following steps exactly to load IOS to the new flash: > > when in rommon this is what needs to be done > > rommon>IP_ADDRESS= ip address of the router > rommon>IP_SUBNET_MASK= subnet amsk > rommon>DEFAULT_GATEWAY= gateway if tftp server is on different subnet > rommon>TFTP_SERVER= ip address of tftp server > rommon>TFTP_FILE= name IOS file on the tftp server > > rommon>boot > > this should fix your problem > > -Jeff > > > - Original Message - > From: Fawad Alam > To: > Cc: > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:35 AM > Subject: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > In order to increase flash on my 2600 Router I ordered 16MB Kingston > Flash. > > I removed the original 8 MB flash and inserted this new 16MB flash and the > > message I am getting is: > > rommon 1 > boot > > device does not contain a valid magic number > > boot: cannot open "flash:" > > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > > > What should I do for the router to recognize this new flash?? > > > > Thanks... > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12442&t=12442 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
connectivity between SUN and CISCO with X.25 [7:12482]
Dear Group, Has anybody worked on this type of connectivity:- x.25 Ethernet x.25 SUN BOX>CISCO2620cisco2620
RE: ISDN Help [7:12365]
This should fix it. Interface bri 0 no ip nat inside interface dialer 0 no ip nat inside ip nat outside exit access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 no ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0 overload ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer 0 overload ctrl-z Additionally, unless they've said otherwise, you don't need to exchange RIP updates with your ISP. You can remove the RIP stuff from the -Original Message- From: dt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN Help [7:12365] Hi, I am pretty new so please be patient. I am wearing my flame retardant suit. I am trying to configure my ISDN BR. I am running a Cisco 804. Everything connects just fine. I can ping the inside interface on the router, the outside interface (dialer) which get an IP address from my ISP. I can ping the interfaces of my nodes on the LAN. I authenticate to the ISP Radius server. From the router everything seems to resolve just fine but from my inside network ( I run NAT) I can only ping the router interfaces. I can not ping anything beyond my outside interface. I know I must be missing something basic but I just can't figure it out. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Dave T Here is my sh run from the router. Current configuration: ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname backbone_r1 ! enable secret 5 x enable password ! dial-peer voice 1 pots no call-waiting ring 0 port 1 destination-pattern xx ! pots country US ip subnet-zero ! ip domain-name uswest.net ip name-server 206.196.128.1 isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside ! interface BRI0 ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside encapsulation ppp bandwidth 64 dialer rotary-group 0 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 isdn spid2 isdn incoming-voice modem ! interface Dialer0 ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside ip rip send version 1 ip rip receive version 1 encapsulation ppp bandwidth 64 keepalive 32767 dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer string 3032541488 dialer string 3032541186 dialer hold-queue 10 dialer load-threshold 10 outbound dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap callin ppp pap sent-username xxx password xxx ppp multilink ! router rip router rip network 10.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.0.0 ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface BRI0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 1 protocol clns permit dialer-list 1 protocol netbios permit ! line con 0 transport input none stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 password login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12485&t=12365 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Help [7:12365]
Well, I think I am getting closer. I went to the Cisco web site and read about NAT. I know now, thanks to those from the group that replied, that part of my problem was with the NAT entries and the inside/outside entries. I reconfigured my router and just for a minute I was able to browse the web and ping my firewall at work from a node on the private segment. Then it fell out and I was back to only being able to ping inside and outside from the router. Close but no cigar. I have been working on this for hours on end and it has been one of the best learning exercises I have had since building a Raptor firewall. But that is another story. I have been reading the threads on this site for quite a while. For the newer people like me those who post to this group are a great resource. Thanks to all of you. So here is my new config. Any insight to my oversight is appreciated. Thanks dt Current configuration: ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname backbone_r1 ! enable secret ! ! dial-peer voice 1 pots no call-waiting ring 1 port 1 destination-pattern x ! pots country US ip subnet-zero ip dhcp excluded-address 172.16.0.2 172.16.0.3 ! ip dhcp pool 1 network 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 default-router 172.16.0.2 ! ip name-server 206.196.128.1 isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 description connected to EthernetLAN ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.0.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside ! interface BRI0 description connected to Internet no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer rotary-group 0 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 isdn spid2 x isdn voice-priority xx out off isdn voice-priority xxx in conditional isdn incoming-voice modem no cdp enable ! interface Dialer0 description connected to Internet ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp no ip split-horizon bandwidth 64 dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 1200 dialer string 3032541488 dialer string 3032541186 dialer hold-queue 10 dialer load-threshold 5 outbound dialer-group 1 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname ppp chap password 7 06 ppp pap sent-username xxxr password 7 060 ppp multilink ! interface Dialer1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no cdp enable ! router rip version 2 passive-interface Dialer0 network 172.16.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip nat translation udp-timeout 600 ip nat translation finrst-timeout 90 ip nat translation dns-timeout 90 ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 ! access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit snmp-server community public RO snmp-server location SOHO snmp-server contact ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 password login transport input none stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 password login ! end ""dt"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > I am pretty new so please be patient. I am wearing my flame retardant suit. > > I am trying to configure my ISDN BR. I am running a Cisco 804. Everything > connects just fine. I can ping the inside interface on the router, the > outside interface (dialer) which get an IP address from my ISP. I can ping > the interfaces of my nodes on the LAN. I authenticate to the ISP Radius > server. From the router everything seems to resolve just fine but from my > inside network ( I run NAT) I can only ping the router interfaces. I can > not ping anything beyond my outside interface. > > I know I must be missing something basic but I just can't figure it out. Any > help will be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks > > Dave T > > Here is my sh run from the router. > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > no service pad > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname backbone_r1 > ! > enable secret 5 x > enable password > ! > dial-peer voice 1 pots > no call-waiting > ring 0 > port 1 > destination-pattern xx > ! > pots country US > ip subnet-zero > ! > ip domain-name uswest.net > ip name-server 206.196.128.1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.0.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > ! > interface BRI0 > ip address negotiated > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > encapsulation ppp > bandwidth 64 > dialer rotary-group 0 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 > isdn spid2 > isdn incoming-voice modem > ! > interface Dialer0 > ip address negotiated > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > ip rip send version 1 > ip rip receive version 1 > encapsulation ppp > bandwidth 64 > keepalive 32767 > dialer in-band > dialer idle-timeout 300 > dialer string 3
Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 [7:12450]
John, No - the console port is where you do this - if you see an unreadable string - then your baud rate, parity, #of bits, handshaking, may be wrong. I believe 9600 - 8, 1 will work. You can up the baud rate via the console. Regards, John - Original Message - From: "john, Dang" To: "DOCSIS ATP Rack#2" ; "Jeff Theobalt" ; "Fawad Alam" ; Cc: Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 9:59 PM Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > Hi John, > the console serial port keep bursting unreadable string, > do you refer to serial 0 sync/async port ? > please advise, > JD > > > - Original Message - > From: "DOCSIS ATP Rack#2" > To: "john, Dang" ; "Jeff Theobalt" ; > "Fawad Alam" ; > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 11:38 PM > Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > John, > > > > You can recover from a catastrophic failure by reloading via the serial > port > > using Xmodem or Zmodem (I think). I've done this before - it's painful - > > but you can recover. I'm not sure if this is what is required - but if > your > > router is brain dead and can't tftp - this this is your only choice. It > > happened to me with a 3620 - took about 2hrs. before I was completely > > back up. > > > > Good Luck, > > John > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "john, Dang" > > To: "Jeff Theobalt" ; "Fawad Alam" ; > > > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:52 PM > > Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > > > > Hello every one, > > > I need help for reinstall flash program into Cisco 3810 > > > concentrator router, I think I mess up the flash after > > > I reload the upgrade ISO,12.0 > > > any one can give me some advise, > > > thank you > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jeff Theobalt" > > > To: "Fawad Alam" ; > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:55 PM > > > Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > > > > > > > That is because it is unformatted and there is no IOS on the flash. > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, you will need to format the flash . Once this is done > > complete > > > > the following steps exactly to load IOS to the new flash: > > > > > > > > when in rommon this is what needs to be done > > > > > > > > rommon>IP_ADDRESS= ip address of the router > > > > rommon>IP_SUBNET_MASK= subnet amsk > > > > rommon>DEFAULT_GATEWAY= gateway if tftp server is on different subnet > > > > rommon>TFTP_SERVER= ip address of tftp server > > > > rommon>TFTP_FILE= name IOS file on the tftp server > > > > > > > > rommon>boot > > > > > > > > this should fix your problem > > > > > > > > -Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: Fawad Alam > > > > To: > > > > Cc: > > > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:35 AM > > > > Subject: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to increase flash on my 2600 Router I ordered 16MB Kingston > > > > Flash. > > > > > I removed the original 8 MB flash and inserted this new 16MB flash > and > > > the > > > > > message I am getting is: > > > > > rommon 1 > boot > > > > > device does not contain a valid magic number > > > > > boot: cannot open "flash:" > > > > > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > > > > > > > > > What should I do for the router to recognize this new flash?? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > > > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12450&t=12450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421]
someone was funnen ya. I used to read a rag called Network Magazine. It has been a while, so I don't have an address or a web site for you. I'm sure a google search will get you there. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kwame Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421] What does this response mean? ""Robert Hanley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > --- Adwoa wrote: > > I'm looking for a reliable non-vendor based > > journal/magazine devoted to > > networking. Any suggestions? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12488&t=12421 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isochronous [7:12486]
Does anyone have a link to some detailed information concerning isochronous, pleisochronous, or any other flavor of communication. I did a couple of searches and was not satisfied with the results. Thanks Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12486&t=12486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 [7:12445]
John, You can recover from a catastrophic failure by reloading via the serial port using Xmodem or Zmodem (I think). I've done this before - it's painful - but you can recover. I'm not sure if this is what is required - but if your router is brain dead and can't tftp - this this is your only choice. It happened to me with a 3620 - took about 2hrs. before I was completely back up. Good Luck, John - Original Message - From: "john, Dang" To: "Jeff Theobalt" ; "Fawad Alam" ; Cc: Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > Hello every one, > I need help for reinstall flash program into Cisco 3810 > concentrator router, I think I mess up the flash after > I reload the upgrade ISO,12.0 > any one can give me some advise, > thank you > > > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff Theobalt" > To: "Fawad Alam" ; > Cc: > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:55 PM > Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > That is because it is unformatted and there is no IOS on the flash. > > > > > > Therefore, you will need to format the flash . Once this is done complete > > the following steps exactly to load IOS to the new flash: > > > > when in rommon this is what needs to be done > > > > rommon>IP_ADDRESS= ip address of the router > > rommon>IP_SUBNET_MASK= subnet amsk > > rommon>DEFAULT_GATEWAY= gateway if tftp server is on different subnet > > rommon>TFTP_SERVER= ip address of tftp server > > rommon>TFTP_FILE= name IOS file on the tftp server > > > > rommon>boot > > > > this should fix your problem > > > > -Jeff > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Fawad Alam > > To: > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:35 AM > > Subject: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > > > > In order to increase flash on my 2600 Router I ordered 16MB Kingston > > Flash. > > > I removed the original 8 MB flash and inserted this new 16MB flash and > the > > > message I am getting is: > > > rommon 1 > boot > > > device does not contain a valid magic number > > > boot: cannot open "flash:" > > > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > > > > > What should I do for the router to recognize this new flash?? > > > > > > Thanks... > > > > > > > _ > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12445&t=12445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isochronous [7:12486]
If you haven't already try: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ita/itai.htm http://www.webopedia.com/ http://www.worldcom.com/tools-resources/communications_library Cheers, Paul - Original Message - From: Donald B Johnson jr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:26 PM Subject: isochronous [7:12486] Does anyone have a link to some detailed information concerning isochronous, pleisochronous, or any other flavor of communication. I did a couple of searches and was not satisfied with the results. Thanks Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12490&t=12486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12489]
You could always disable HTTP service on you routers. mark -Original Message- From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12487] This Cisco bug will BITE only if you use local account. If you use TACACS for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA), then you do NOT to have to worry about this bug. I've been trying to test it in the lab without success because I use TACACS. If anyone think I am wrong, please contact me and straight me out. Sean >From: "cisco skin" >Reply-To: "cisco skin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12478] >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:37:54 -0400 > >Check your MSFC's!!! > > >""Oke Oyebanji"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everybody, > > > > This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early > > this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For > > details check: > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm > > > > Have a nice day. > > > > Kind regards, > > Banji. > > > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had >a > > name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12489&t=12489 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with MIB [7:8318]
try www.mibcentral.com They have a mib search engine and give a brief description for each mib. LB ""art news"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello all, > > I know this is off the topic but I would appreciate if any body knows the > MIB and corresponding OID for backplane utilization of Catalyst 3500 > switches. > > Thanks > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12491&t=8318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Source Quench [7:12477]
Hi, The Source-Quench message comes from a server when it`s buffers are unable to process all the info bieng sent to it.. this usually means that the nt is set for 100/Full - the switch is set for 100/full for the nt box , but the UX box (and its switch port)is only set for 10/half ...usually the switch is aet to auto . without any special processing on the switch it will just send as many packets out of one port that it recieve`s from another... check the settings on both servers and make sure there the same... then try agian ... happens to me all the time.and the server guys INsist it`s the network HTH steve >From: "Amit Gupta" >Reply-To: "Amit Gupta" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Source Quench [7:12477] >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:29:14 -0400 > >Hi All, > >I am getting a " Source Quench message " from one of >my HP-UX Servers when I try to ping it from an NT >machine / Switch > >I am getting the following msg when I ping the server >from the external router >Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x timeout is 2 >seconds: >Q > >However if I ping the same server from a Unix machine >/ server, it is ok. > >Could it be a problem with the server NIC > >Thanks & Regards > >Amit > > > > > > > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12492&t=12477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12493]
I remain curious about this. filtering http access sources from untrusted interfaces and destined for router interfaces does not work? I'll have to try this in the lab access-list 101 deny tcp untrusted_network router_interface eq 80 access-list 101 permit ip any any Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12489] You could always disable HTTP service on you routers. mark -Original Message- From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12487] This Cisco bug will BITE only if you use local account. If you use TACACS for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA), then you do NOT to have to worry about this bug. I've been trying to test it in the lab without success because I use TACACS. If anyone think I am wrong, please contact me and straight me out. Sean >From: "cisco skin" >Reply-To: "cisco skin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12478] >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:37:54 -0400 > >Check your MSFC's!!! > > >""Oke Oyebanji"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everybody, > > > > This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early > > this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For > > details check: > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm > > > > Have a nice day. > > > > Kind regards, > > Banji. > > > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had >a > > name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12493&t=12493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421]
Try this list. It is extracted from a PowerPoint presentation, which is why the formatting is odd looking. http://www.chipps.com/Periodicals.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421] someone was funnen ya. I used to read a rag called Network Magazine. It has been a while, so I don't have an address or a web site for you. I'm sure a google search will get you there. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kwame Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421] What does this response mean? ""Robert Hanley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > --- Adwoa wrote: > > I'm looking for a reliable non-vendor based > > journal/magazine devoted to > > networking. Any suggestions? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12494&t=12421 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
Im still stuggling with an async connection. Using Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my router configured but I cant seem to get the modem to dial. Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here is my config. Current configuration: ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! no logging console ! ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT \T" TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT ! ! ! interface Serial0 physical-layer async no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer pool-member 1 async mode dedicated ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 speed auto ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name ? dialer pool 1 dialer string 1308334 dialer hold-queue 100 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 no exec script dialer dial modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usr_courier transport input all stopbits 1 flowcontrol hardware line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins all set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12496&t=12496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resume ... [7:12495]
Hello, Attached is a copy of my resume. Thank you for your consideration. John Ho > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name of JH_RES.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12495&t=12495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: quest on IPsec [7:12484]
The Presentation 2001 of Cisco website... include a powerpoint talking about Advanced IPSEC Configuration. 1. IPSEC HSRP 2. IPSEC loadbalancing ""ciscos ccie"" Hi Friends, > > I would like to know whether IPSEC works with loadbalancing in a VPN..Pls > pass on some good url's if you have come across.. > > > Look forward to ur replies... > > Regards / Thangs > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12498&t=12484 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Claim your Free 4-In-1 Super Pen, it's been paid for by... [7:12497]
At 10:32 AM 7/2/2001 -0400, you wrote: >This Multifunction pen with PDA Stylus, Pencil and Red, Blue >ball pen is for you Free! All you have to do is to fill out the simple >survey questions below from our sponsors. > > > No more Frustration looking for the right Pen! > >This lightweight efficient writing instrument lets you quickly switch >from PDA stylus, to blue or red ballpoint pen, to a mechanical pencil by >just depressing top button when you are looking at the indicator printed >on the barrel. Fits comfortably in your hand with a no-slip metal >textured grip. Everything you need is right at hand. So it's ideal for >working on plane, in train and any cramped quarter. And now you can >travel light at work or on the road with just this one Super "pen," >instead of a pocketful of things. The 4-in-1 pen reduces clutter and >ends the frustration and wasted time of looking for the right instrument >or switch between stylus and pen. Retract with quick release side >button. Refills available. >Similar item like this sell for more than $35 plus shipping and handling >in retail store > >, but it will be yours Free. >Our sponsor will assure you that your responses will in no way go into >your personal profile. >They are interested in statistical data only. > > > >Questions Response >Do you own or use any kind of PDA(Personal Digital Assistant)? yes > >Do you own or use a digital camera or camcorder?yes > >Do you own or use a Sony game console such as PS1,PS2 or Gameboy? >yes > >Do you own or use a MP3 player? >no >Do you own or use a DVD player? yes > >Group Profile: >Area Code 713 >Gender:Male >Age Group select below 31-45 >Income select below 60-80k >This survey is intended for [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are not the >intended recipient, please fill out your email address at right. Thanks. > >After you selected your choices, don't forget to >Links to some of our sponsors: > > > _ > > _ > > >This email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you believe you did not >belong to our sponsors customers list, >you can remove your email address from our distribution list by clicking >the link below. >Click here > if >you prefer not to receive future e-mail from us. >Click here to view our >permission marketing policy. Michael L. Peled LAN/WAN/SECURITY Project Engineer Schlumberger Network Solutions SLB North America 5599 San Felipe Suite 400 Houston, TX 77056 (713) 499-6513 Voice (713) 403-7204 Fax (713) 240-7579 Cell email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12497&t=12497 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN status [7:12499]
What does it mean when that L2 status is in state=init instead of state=established as in the following message. Layer 2 Status: TEI = 82, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 84, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI 82, ces = 1, state = 5(init) spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 70, tid = 1 TEI 84, ces = 2, state = 5(init) spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 71, tid = 1 Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12499&t=12499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Cisco=20study=20partners=20in=20West=20Michigan= [7:12500]
I currently live in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and am looking for a Cisco study partner or two... I have completed my CCNA, CCDA, BCMSN, BCRAN, CIT, and plan on taking the BSCN in about 10 days. I am interested in almost any skill level, and I have a nice amount of lab equipment to offer towards study. Any interested parties? Here is my current list of lab gear. 3x 2501 2x 2621 1x 2612 1x 4000 (4pt Serial & Token Ring) 1x 3524 1x 1604 1x CS-506 If I had a working copy of Visio I would have a networkd diagram for you. -- Kevin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12500&t=12500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
I should be more specific I think. Im not even getting the modem to dial. I think my problem is with the chat script. I checked 56k.com and still have no idea how to write the script (yep, Im a complete newbie with modems) I believe I have the DIP switches set correctly now (3 and 8 down for the USR modem). The initialization string that the cisco website says to use is AT&F1S0=1 while 56k.com says AT&F1 should be fine. Maybe that narrows down the problem Im having. Ben --- Farhan Ahmed wrote: > are u getting the answer of access server or no > is it stays on verifying password or ur router > doesnt dial at all > check your modem chat script at 56k.com > send me > > debug ppp negotiation > > > -Original Message- > From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: async issues - still cant get it to dial > [7:12496] > > > Im still stuggling with an async connection. Using > Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my router > configured but I cant seem to get the modem to dial. > > Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote > dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here > is > my config. > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.1 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname Router > ! > no logging console > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > memory-size iomem 25 > ip subnet-zero > ! > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT \T" > TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT > ! > ! > ! > interface Serial0 > physical-layer async > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer pool-member 1 > async mode dedicated > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 > speed auto > ! > interface Dialer1 > ip address negotiated > encapsulation ppp > dialer remote-name ? > dialer pool 1 > dialer string 1308334 > dialer hold-queue 100 > dialer-group 1 > ppp authentication pap > ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 > ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 > no ip http server > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line 1 > no exec > script dialer dial > modem InOut > modem autoconfigure type usr_courier > transport input all > stopbits 1 > flowcontrol hardware > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > > > Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins > all > set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? > > Ben > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12502&t=12496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
are u getting the answer of access server or no is it stays on verifying password or ur router doesnt dial at all check your modem chat script at 56k.com send me debug ppp negotiation -Original Message- From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496] Im still stuggling with an async connection. Using Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my router configured but I cant seem to get the modem to dial. Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here is my config. Current configuration: ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! no logging console ! ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT \T" TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT ! ! ! interface Serial0 physical-layer async no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer pool-member 1 async mode dedicated ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 speed auto ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name ? dialer pool 1 dialer string 1308334 dialer hold-queue 100 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 no exec script dialer dial modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usr_courier transport input all stopbits 1 flowcontrol hardware line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins all set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12501&t=12496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448]
I've seen this error with the Microsoft DNS caching servers and some Internet Unix boxes. Seems to be a DNS compatibility issue. Here is the Scenario. You have a Microsoft DNS server that your exchange server uses? If so, try adding another Internet DNS server to the Exchange server's DNS server search order. Thank You, Michael Ayers Network Engineer > OneNeck IT Services (480) 539-2203 (800) 272-3077 -Original Message- From: Raees Ahmed Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448] Dear Friends, I am facing a very strange problem with our Mailing System Exchange5.5sp4. The issue is that we are not able to send email message to some of the sites on the internet. Most of the other popular sites , you can say 90% of the sites are reachable by our email clients. But when the clients try to send message to those few site, they get and Non-Delivery-Report saying that the mail could not be delivered. Strange enough that email address is reachable through yahoo, hotmail and other sites. I have checked our router for any access-list blocking but I am sure nothing is of that sort, no access-lists are controlling those addresses. Our ISP from whom we are connected to the internet is also able to reach that sites. But we using the ISP's DNS servers for name resolution cannot connect to those particular hosts. One strange behavior though, when I tried to trace route a website add, for that particular mail host, I is taking more than 15 hops and then declared unreachable by our Static Router, No Dynamic protocol is running between us and our ISP, we are using default route. Any help or insights would be valuable and really be appreciated. I know this has nothing to do with Cisco, but the fact is Applications, and User Usability is driving the Technology. so this mail is not so uncommon for a Cisco SE. Thanks and Regards, S. Raees [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Glacier Bkgrd.jpg] Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12503&t=12448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccie security study group [7:12504]
There was some interest in a CCIE security study group...looks like one already exists! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cciesecurity Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12504&t=12504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12505]
As I understand it, excuse me if I am wrong, but this bug is focused on the ability of newer routers to be managed via http, not so much to deny port 80 traffic. There is a means, by using a particular string, to gain admin level privileges on the affected router. It has been said that using TACACS will resolve this problem, as well as the 'no ip http server' command. Also this bug affects IOS version 11.1 and above...so for all those using old IOS (I am guilty also)...smile you're delay in upgrading has been worthwhile..!! -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12493] I remain curious about this. filtering http access sources from untrusted interfaces and destined for router interfaces does not work? I'll have to try this in the lab access-list 101 deny tcp untrusted_network router_interface eq 80 access-list 101 permit ip any any Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12489] You could always disable HTTP service on you routers. mark -Original Message- From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12487] This Cisco bug will BITE only if you use local account. If you use TACACS for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA), then you do NOT to have to worry about this bug. I've been trying to test it in the lab without success because I use TACACS. If anyone think I am wrong, please contact me and straight me out. Sean >From: "cisco skin" >Reply-To: "cisco skin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Alert: HTTP bug makes nearly all Cisco routers vulnerable [7:12478] >Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:37:54 -0400 > >Check your MSFC's!!! > > >""Oke Oyebanji"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Everybody, > > > > This was a released from TechRepublic on Cisco routers vulnerablity early > > this morning, please do check it out and take necessary precaution. For > > details check: > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220010716mco02.htm > > > > Have a nice day. > > > > Kind regards, > > Banji. > > > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had >a > > name of Cisco Routers Bugs.doc] misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12505&t=12505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isochronous [7:12486]
I was looking for something more in-depth than a dictionary definition. - Original Message - From: "Paul" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Re: isochronous [7:12486] > If you haven't already try: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ita/itai.htm > > http://www.webopedia.com/ > > http://www.worldcom.com/tools-resources/communications_library > > Cheers, Paul > > > - Original Message - > From: Donald B Johnson jr > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:26 PM > Subject: isochronous [7:12486] > > > Does anyone have a link to some detailed information concerning > isochronous, > pleisochronous, or any other flavor of communication. I did a couple of > searches and was not satisfied with the results. > Thanks > Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12506&t=12486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN status [7:12499]
According to http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_sh_isdn_stat.html, a state of init or established means that the BRI is functioning correctly. Any other state indicates an error. HTH, John >>> "SH Wesson" 7/16/01 10:43:36 AM >>> What does it mean when that L2 status is in state=init instead of state=established as in the following message. Layer 2 Status: TEI = 82, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 84, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI 82, ces = 1, state = 5(init) spid1 configured, no LDN, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 70, tid = 1 TEI 84, ces = 2, state = 5(init) spid2 configured, no LDN, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 71, tid = 1 Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12507&t=12499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resume ... [7:12495]
John, This is not a site for resumees. However, if you follow the job link below, you can contact the companies listed and/or see if they have any needs for something you're interested in. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Ho, John (JOHO) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Resume ... [7:12495] Hello, Attached is a copy of my resume. Thank you for your consideration. John Ho > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name of JH_RES.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12508&t=12495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isochronous [7:12486]
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1394/1/Documents/BR052R01.pdf Best I have got! - Original Message - From: Donald B Johnson jr To: Paul ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:00 PM Subject: Re: isochronous [7:12486] I was looking for something more in-depth than a dictionary definition. - Original Message - From: "Paul" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Re: isochronous [7:12486] > If you haven't already try: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ita/itai.htm > > http://www.webopedia.com/ > > http://www.worldcom.com/tools-resources/communications_library > > Cheers, Paul > > > - Original Message - > From: Donald B Johnson jr > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:26 PM > Subject: isochronous [7:12486] > > > Does anyone have a link to some detailed information concerning > isochronous, > pleisochronous, or any other flavor of communication. I did a couple of > searches and was not satisfied with the results. > Thanks > Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12509&t=12486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Source Quench [7:12477]
I doubt it's related to a problem with the NIC. If there were a problem with the NIC, it would probably be unable to respond at all or to send the source quench. The server is just telling you that it doesn't have buffers or other resources to handle the ping. When you ping from the Unix machine, what is the timeout? Does the Unix machine send less often than the router, resulting in the server not getting overwhelmed? What else is the server doing? I have seen Mac OS send source quench when pinged. I have never considered it a problem. The Mac is OK in every other respect. I'm glad this topic came up again because I had previously said that source quench was obsolsete per RFC 1812. RFC 1812 is Requirements for IPv4 Routers. A router should not send a source quench. But a host may send a source quench. Per RFC 1122, Requirements for IP Hosts, "a host may send a source quench message if it is approaching, or has reached, the point at which it is forced to discard incoming datagrams due to a shortage of reassembly buffers or other resources." Even though RFC 1122 is old, it has not been replaced as far as I can tell. So, source quench is not obsolete for hosts. Priscilla At 10:29 AM 7/16/01, Amit Gupta wrote: >Hi All, > >I am getting a " Source Quench message " from one of >my HP-UX Servers when I try to ping it from an NT >machine / Switch > >I am getting the following msg when I ping the server >from the external router >Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x timeout is 2 >seconds: >Q > >However if I ping the same server from a Unix machine >/ server, it is ok. > >Could it be a problem with the server NIC > >Thanks & Regards > >Amit > > > > > > > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12510&t=12477 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
1. Reverse telnet to the modem to verify it is working okay. 2. Clear line x 3. debug dialer events & ping 150.150.x.x to see if it is activating the dialer interface. 4. look confused. -Original Message- From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496] Im still stuggling with an async connection. Using Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my router configured but I cant seem to get the modem to dial. Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here is my config. Current configuration: ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! no logging console ! ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT \T" TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT ! ! ! interface Serial0 physical-layer async no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer pool-member 1 async mode dedicated ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 speed auto ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name ? dialer pool 1 dialer string 1308334 dialer hold-queue 100 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 no exec script dialer dial modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usr_courier transport input all stopbits 1 flowcontrol hardware line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins all set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12511&t=12496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
use config maker -Original Message- From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496] I should be more specific I think. Im not even getting the modem to dial. I think my problem is with the chat script. I checked 56k.com and still have no idea how to write the script (yep, Im a complete newbie with modems) I believe I have the DIP switches set correctly now (3 and 8 down for the USR modem). The initialization string that the cisco website says to use is AT&F1S0=1 while 56k.com says AT&F1 should be fine. Maybe that narrows down the problem Im having. Ben --- Farhan Ahmed wrote: > are u getting the answer of access server or no > is it stays on verifying password or ur router > doesnt dial at all > check your modem chat script at 56k.com > send me > > debug ppp negotiation > > > -Original Message- > From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: async issues - still cant get it to dial > [7:12496] > > > Im still stuggling with an async connection. Using > Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my router > configured but I cant seem to get the modem to dial. > > Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote > dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here > is > my config. > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.1 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname Router > ! > no logging console > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > memory-size iomem 25 > ip subnet-zero > ! > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT \T" > TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT > ! > ! > ! > interface Serial0 > physical-layer async > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer pool-member 1 > async mode dedicated > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 > speed auto > ! > interface Dialer1 > ip address negotiated > encapsulation ppp > dialer remote-name ? > dialer pool 1 > dialer string 1308334 > dialer hold-queue 100 > dialer-group 1 > ppp authentication pap > ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 > ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 > no ip http server > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line 1 > no exec > script dialer dial > modem InOut > modem autoconfigure type usr_courier > transport input all > stopbits 1 > flowcontrol hardware > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > > > Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins > all > set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? > > Ben > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12512&t=12496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CAT5500 [7:12514]
I'm receiving a used Catalyst5500 today and would like help checking that everything works. I know I can't test everything that quickly but, what would you look for? Can anyone give me a list of things I should at first to be sure it is O.K? It is CAT5500 chassis, supervisorII with MMF, and WS-X5213A 12port module - Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12514&t=12514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421]
BCR would fit that role nicely. http://www.bcr.com/bcrmag/ I also like LightReading, but some people think they are vendor biased (pro-Nortel, anti-Cisco). http://www.lightreading.com/ -dre ""Adwoa"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm looking for a reliable non-vendor based journal/magazine devoted to > networking. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12515&t=12421 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for a Reliable Network Journal/Magazine [7:12421]
Look at the source of the message. -dre ""Kwame"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What does this response mean? > > ""Robert Hanley"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > --- Adwoa wrote: > > > I'm looking for a reliable non-vendor based > > > journal/magazine devoted to > > > networking. Any suggestions? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12516&t=12421 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wic-2a/s on 3640 [7:12517]
anyone have any experience with a wic-2a/s on a 3640. I have IOS version 11.1 and the card is not being seen. I think I have to upgrade to IOS version 12.x in order for the router to see the card. Can anyone confirm this? Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12517&t=12517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isochronous [7:12486]
I don't have a link, but I can provide some advice. To understand these words, remember your linguistics or Greek classes from college. You did take such classes, I hope!? ;-) Math classes help also. What is an isosceles triangle, for example? A triangle with two equal sides. Iso means "equal" in Greek. According to Webster's, isochronous or isochronal means uniform in time, having equal duration, recurring at regular intervals. For example, a multimedia application might require a transport that delivers data at regularly occurring, equal intervals. The intervals between data delivery events are all equal so that voice and video are not jerky. Asynchronous means no timing. Adding an "a" negates something in Greek, such as an amoral person who has no morals. Data can be delivered at any time with asynchronous transmission. Synchronous is similar to isochronous, but has the additional restriction that data is delivered at specific intervals. A common timing is established between communicating stations so that both sides know when it is OK to send data. There is a separate clocking signal used to get both sides "in synch." SONET is an example of a synchronous system. Manchester encoding and other LAN encodings are isochronous. With LAN technologies, clocking, which is embedded in the signal with the data, occurs at regular intervals, but the communicating stations do not synch up to a clock first. For communications to be truly synchronous, they must share a clock. You are probably aware of WAN technologies that require a network clock. Plesio means "almost" in Greek. Plesiochronous systems, such as the North American Digital Hierarchy and European E systems, are almost synchronous. They have almost all the same characteristics of a truly synchronous system: a clocking signal, data sent at specific intervals, etc. But the communicating stations are not sourced from the same clock and so, over the long term, get skewed from each other. The inaccuracy of timing will force a WAN switch, over time, to repeat or delete frames in order to handle buffer underflow or overflow. These are called frame slips. I have also read that one of the problems with plesiochonuos systems is that it is hard to break out one channel. Although isolating a 64-Kbps channel from a DS-1 circuit is straightforward, isolating a 64-Kbps channel from a DS-3 trunk requires demultiplexing to the DS-1 level first. SONET does not have this problem. Hope that didn't muddy the waters too much!? ;-) Priscilla At 11:26 AM 7/16/01, Donald B Johnson jr wrote: >Does anyone have a link to some detailed information concerning isochronous, >pleisochronous, or any other flavor of communication. I did a couple of >searches and was not satisfied with the results. >Thanks >Don Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12519&t=12486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent question related to vtp [7:11687]
At 10:42 AM 7/16/01, Hire, Ejay wrote: >Q: How does VTP interact with trunks, if at all? >A: VTP's only interaction with trunks is "pruning", removal of unused VLANS >from trunks where they are not in use. Pruning is supposedly disabled by >default, but I've had issues with it and always explicitly turn it on or >off. I'm so glad to hear you say that. I have had issues with pruning also. I thought it was only me! ;-) Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12518&t=11687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sniffer Shareware [7:12520]
Does anyone know if there is a sniffer-like shareware that can run on a pc? Do anyone have any cheap suggestions? Thank you, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12520&t=12520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
Give this a try. I have it working with USR external modems on 2610 routers--I am using dip switch settings 1 & 4 down everything else up on the modem. username password chat-script backup "" "atdt \T" TIMEOUT 60 "CONNECT" \c ! interface Serial0 physical-layer async ip address negotiated encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 1200 dialer string dialer-group 1 no cdp enable ppp authentication pap ppp pap sent-username password ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit line 33 script dialer backup modem InOut transport input all speed 57600 ""No Data"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Im still stuggling with an async connection. Using > Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my router > configured but I cant seem to get the modem to dial. > Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote > dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here is > my config. > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.1 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname Router > ! > no logging console > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > memory-size iomem 25 > ip subnet-zero > ! > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT \T" > TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT > ! > ! > ! > interface Serial0 > physical-layer async > no ip address > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer pool-member 1 > async mode dedicated > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 > speed auto > ! > interface Dialer1 > ip address negotiated > encapsulation ppp > dialer remote-name ? > dialer pool 1 > dialer string 1308334 > dialer hold-queue 100 > dialer-group 1 > ppp authentication pap > ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 > ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 > no ip http server > ! > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line 1 > no exec > script dialer dial > modem InOut > modem autoconfigure type usr_courier > transport input all > stopbits 1 > flowcontrol hardware > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > > > Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins all > set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? > > Ben > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12521&t=12496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wic-2a/s on 3640 [7:12517]
At a minimum you need 12.0(7)XK or 12.1(1)T to support a WIC-2A/S. HTH, John >>> "No Data" 7/16/01 12:27:10 PM >>> anyone have any experience with a wic-2a/s on a 3640. I have IOS version 11.1 and the card is not being seen. I think I have to upgrade to IOS version 12.x in order for the router to see the card. Can anyone confirm this? Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12523&t=12517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: isochronous [7:12486]
Thank You, Donald B Johnson Jr - Original Message - From: "Paul" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:33 AM Subject: Re: isochronous [7:12486] > http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1394/1/Documents/BR052R01.pdf > > Best I have got! > - Original Message - > From: Donald B Johnson jr > To: Paul ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:00 PM > Subject: Re: isochronous [7:12486] > > > I was looking for something more in-depth than a dictionary definition. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:41 AM > Subject: Re: isochronous [7:12486] > > > > If you haven't already try: > > > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ita/itai.htm > > > > http://www.webopedia.com/ > > > > http://www.worldcom.com/tools-resources/communications_library > > > > Cheers, Paul > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Donald B Johnson jr > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:26 PM > > Subject: isochronous [7:12486] > > > > > > Does anyone have a link to some detailed information concerning > > isochronous, > > pleisochronous, or any other flavor of communication. I did a couple of > > searches and was not satisfied with the results. > > Thanks > > Don Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12522&t=12486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496] (FW) [7:12524] RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496]
No Problem. May I forward these to the group? -Ejay P.s. It took me two weeks the first time I tried to make this work. -Original Message- From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:07 PM To: Hire, Ejay Subject: RE: async issues - still cant get it to dial [7:12496] Oh man, that worked. Thank you so much. Im now going to try dial between two routers so if it isnt any inconvience to you I will probably need more help later today. Again, thank you so much. Ben --- "Hire, Ejay" wrote: > >00:01:48: CHAT1: Chat script dial finished, status > = > >Connection timed out; remote host not responding > > This indicates that the connection timed out. I.e. > the modem didn't finish > negotiating before the timeout. Let's increase the > timeout in the > Chatstring. Also, I saw your post on groupstudy > about the initialization > string, let's change that as well. > > Before: > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT&F1" OK "ATDT \T" > TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT \c > After: > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT&F&C1&D2" OK > "ATDT \T" TIMEOUT 60 CONNECT > \c > > See if that helps. > > -Ejay > > -Original Message- > From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:25 PM > To: Hire, Ejay > Subject: RE: async issues - still cant get it to > dial [7:12496] > > > 1. The modem works ok via reverse telnet > > 2. OK > > 3. here is the out put > Router#ping 150.150.150.50 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.150.150.50, > timeout is 2 seconds: > > 00:01:43: Se0 DDR: rotor dialout [priority] > 00:01:43: Se0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=10.129.0.132, > d=150.150.150.50) > 00:01:43: Se0 DDR: Attempting to dial 1308334 > 00:01:43: CHAT1: Attempting async line dialer script > 00:01:43: CHAT1: Dialing using Modem script: dial & > System script: none > 00:01:43: CHAT1: process started > 00:01:43: CHAT1: Asserting DTR > 00:01:43: CHAT1: Chat script dial started... > 00:01:48: CHAT1: Chat script dial finished, status = > Connection timed out; remot > e host not responding > 00:01:48: Se0 DDR: disconnecting call.. > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > Router# > 00:02:03: Se0 DDR: re-enable timeout > 00:02:03: DDR: Dialing failed, 3 packets unqueued > and > discarded > Router# > > 4. The look on my face is definately priceless at > this point :) > > In the debug the script looks like it is timeing > out. > Here is the script that I have in there now. > > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT&F1" OK "ATDT \T" > TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT \c > > Any ideas? > > Ben > > PS thanks for the help. > > --- "Hire, Ejay" wrote: > > 1. Reverse telnet to the modem to verify it is > > working okay. > > 2. Clear line x > > 3. debug dialer events & ping 150.150.x.x to see > if > > it is activating the > > dialer interface. > > 4. look confused. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: No Data [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:33 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: async issues - still cant get it to dial > > [7:12496] > > > > > > Im still stuggling with an async connection. > Using > > Ejay's wonderful help last week Ive gotten my > router > > configured but I cant seem to get the modem to > dial. > > > > Right now I am just trying to dial into a remote > > dial-in server with ppp, pap authentication. Here > > is > > my config. > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 12.1 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname Router > > ! > > no logging console > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > memory-size iomem 25 > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > chat-script dial ABORT ERROR "" "AT Z" OK "ATDT > \T" > > TIMEOUT 30 CONNECT > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface Serial0 > > physical-layer async > > no ip address > > encapsulation ppp > > dialer in-band > > dialer pool-member 1 > > async mode dedicated > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0 > > ip address 10.129.0.132 255.255.0.0 > > speed auto > > ! > > interface Dialer1 > > ip address negotiated > > encapsulation ppp > > dialer remote-name ? > > dialer pool 1 > > dialer string 1308334 > > dialer hold-queue 100 > > dialer-group 1 > > ppp authentication pap > > ppp pap sent-username 'name' password 'password' > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.129.0.1 > > ip route 150.150.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 > > no ip http server > > ! > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > ! > > line con 0 > > transport input none > > line 1 > > no exec > > script dialer dial > > modem InOut > > modem autoconfigure type usr_courier > > transport input all > > stopbits 1 > > flowcontrol hardware > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > login > > ! > > end > > > > > > Im using an external usr_courier and have the pins > > all > > set to defaults. Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > Ben Message Posted at:
CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on practice labs. It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why would you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have heard that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat the purpose? If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study tools?. His product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does anyone have any experience with some of the other products out there? Thank you, Yhladi Ghfaskovich CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12526&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access List problem. [7:12525]
Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it and trying things since last week. Any ideas? Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 Have fun... Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12525&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resume ... [7:12495]
It seemed pretty short. I guess you dont have a lot of experience. /me ducks -Original Message- From: Ho, John (JOHO) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Resume ... [7:12495] Hello, Attached is a copy of my resume. Thank you for your consideration. John Ho > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name of JH_RES.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12527&t=12495 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please help!!!!!!!!!! ARP Cache [7:12475]
I ran into a sort of similar problem a while back with a PIX failover. Wouldn't ping until I cleared the arp cache on the router. The ping should have repopulated the arp cache but it didn't. Note that the default arp timeout is 4 hours (unlike most hosts where it is typically about 10 minutes). -- Jonathan NK Sat wrote: > Hi Everybody, > I need some help on this issue.. I am having Cisco 3600 router with some > 16 Class-C connected to the Fast Ethernet as secondary addresses. My host > were not able to ping the router across the ethernetat all... I was seeing > the ARP entry of my host on the router but not able to ping the host from > the router and vice-versa across the ethernet..when i cleared the > arp-cache everything is working...( Notsure when the trouble may come > back) Can somebody tell > 1) What is the size of the ARP-CACHE, where i can see it and how i can > manipulate it. > > 2) If i have "n" hosts and "n" is the maximum hosts the Arp-cache can > accomidate when "n+1" host try to get to a host it will send a brodcast and > get the MAC and get itself into the ARP-Cache removing the oldest entry in > the ARP right? Apparently this does NOT seem to be happening.. Is my > understanding wrong or is this a weird cisco IOS stuff! which needs > the regular upgrade > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks > Satish > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12529&t=12475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TokenRing MAU/Switch (Singapore Readers !) [7:12528]
Hi, I would like to buy/rent Tokenring mau/switch urgently preferably with RJ45 Connector. The Singapore respondents are most welcome. Please reply to me separately. thanks. kr singapore. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12528&t=12528 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access List problem. [7:12525]
i it working or not what u want to allow disallow forget this1 -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it and trying things since last week. Any ideas? Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 Have fun... Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12530&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
The labs in my humble opinion are good. I use them. They make you think and are excellent material to help in the pursuit of the CCIE. Like everyhting else, these labs are just tools and these tools will only get you so far. A combination of reading, a lot of configuration(hands on) and troubleshooting(hands on) and a little luck are keys. If I were you though, I would worry about passing the CCIE written first. Anyway, why call him a clown? I dont know the guy personally but you should be a bit more polite. Raul - Original Message - From: "Yhladi Ghfaskovich" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:06 PM Subject: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] > I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on practice > labs. > It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why > would > you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have > heard > that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat the > purpose? > If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study tools?. > His > product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does > anyone > have any experience with some of the other products out there? > > Thank you, > Yhladi Ghfaskovich > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12531&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
I'll try ;) Let's see: 172.anything from 10.anything 172.22.30.95 from 10.11.12.anything (redundant from above line) 172.22.30.anything denied from 192.168.18.27 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 from 192.168.18.anything (denied 1 line above) 172.22.anything deny 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 (taken care of 2 lines above) permit all So yeah...line 1, 3, and final permit all looks like it to me... Allen - Original Message - From: "Robert Fowler" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > Have fun... > > > Thank You, > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12532&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 [7:12533]
Is this for a 3810 or 2600 series router that you are trying to recover ?? The subject line says 2600 series but the original message says trying to recover on a 3810 series router. They do not work the same way for recovery. Which is it ?? Christopher M. Heffner Certified Cisco Systems Instructor CCSI, CCNA, CCDA, CCIE Candidate MCT, MCSE, MCNI, MCNE, CLI, CLP, ASE, CTT, A+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jade Tiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:34 PM To: john, Dang; Jeff Theobalt; Fawad Alam; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 Hello John, Try tftp download from the ROMMON. It is designed for situation like the one you described. Tiger http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ "john, Dang" wrote: Hello every one, I need help for reinstall flash program into Cisco 3810 concentrator router, I think I mess up the flash after I reload the upgrade ISO,12.0 any one can give me some advise, thank you - Original Message - From: "Jeff Theobalt" To: "Fawad Alam" ; Cc: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > That is because it is unformatted and there is no IOS on the flash. > > > Therefore, you will need to format the flash . Once this is done complete > the following steps exactly to load IOS to the new flash: > > when in rommon this is what needs to be done > > rommon>IP_ADDRESS= ip address of the router > rommon>IP_SUBNET_MASK= subnet amsk > rommon>DEFAULT_GATEWAY= gateway if tftp server is on different subnet > rommon>TFTP_SERVER= ip address of tftp server > rommon>TFTP_FILE= name IOS file on the tftp server > > rommon>boot > > this should fix your problem > > -Jeff > > > - Original Message - > From: Fawad Alam > To: > Cc: > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:35 AM > Subject: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > In order to increase flash on my 2600 Router I ordered 16MB Kingston > Flash. > > I removed the original 8 MB flash and inserted this new 16MB flash and the > > message I am getting is: > > rommon 1 > boot > > device does not contain a valid magic number > > boot: cannot open "flash:" > > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > > > What should I do for the router to recognize this new flash?? > > > > Thanks... > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12533&t=12533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 [7:12513]
Hello John, Try tftp download from the ROMMON. It is designed for situation like the one you described. Tiger http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ "john, Dang" wrote: Hello every one, I need help for reinstall flash program into Cisco 3810 concentrator router, I think I mess up the flash after I reload the upgrade ISO,12.0 any one can give me some advise, thank you - Original Message - From: "Jeff Theobalt" To: "Fawad Alam" ; Cc: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > That is because it is unformatted and there is no IOS on the flash. > > > Therefore, you will need to format the flash . Once this is done complete > the following steps exactly to load IOS to the new flash: > > when in rommon this is what needs to be done > > rommon>IP_ADDRESS= ip address of the router > rommon>IP_SUBNET_MASK= subnet amsk > rommon>DEFAULT_GATEWAY= gateway if tftp server is on different subnet > rommon>TFTP_SERVER= ip address of tftp server > rommon>TFTP_FILE= name IOS file on the tftp server > > rommon>boot > > this should fix your problem > > -Jeff > > > - Original Message - > From: Fawad Alam > To: > Cc: > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 8:35 AM > Subject: [sc] Flash Upgrde problem on Cisco 2600 > > > > In order to increase flash on my 2600 Router I ordered 16MB Kingston > Flash. > > I removed the original 8 MB flash and inserted this new 16MB flash and the > > message I am getting is: > > rommon 1 > boot > > device does not contain a valid magic number > > boot: cannot open "flash:" > > boot: cannot determine first file name on device "flash:" > > > > What should I do for the router to recognize this new flash?? > > > > Thanks... > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe cisco-cert | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12513&t=12513 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]
Hellos' I have a cisco 1601 router which I entered confreg 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 during password recovery. Now, when i reboot the router I am getting CCC on the console !!! Anyone come across this before cheers ./bosire -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12534&t=12534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
I have a familiar feeling that I'm going to be completely off on this one, but hopefully the correct answer will be posted so I can figure out why. As long as the correct "deny" statements are there, it seems to me that the other "permit" statements would be redundant when used with the "permit all" statement at the end. access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 Looking forward to the answer, - Jeremy Felt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Robert Fowler" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > Have fun... > > > Thank You, > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12535&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
I've have heard that the ccbootcamp labs are the hardest and most complete labs available, which justifies the high price tag. Whether that's absolutely true or not, many people use them and feel that they are great tools to prepare for the lab. And you should refrain from calling people clowns on this list. I believe that Marc participates on the groupstudy list, or at least reads it, and at least a few of his friends and associates actively participate on the list. Calling him a clown doesn't make you look very good in this environment. ;-) Actually, I am getting the wiff of a trollI'm not sure, my sinuses are a little stuffed up today, but I'd swear I can smell it John >>> "Yhladi Ghfaskovich" 7/16/01 1:06:45 PM >>> I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on practice labs. It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why would you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have heard that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat the purpose? If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study tools?. His product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does anyone have any experience with some of the other products out there? Thank you, Yhladi Ghfaskovich CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12537&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be able to find out from which state a user is using Yahoo [7:12536]
People, I would like to be able to know from which state a user is using the yahoo messenger or the ISP to this user is connected to. I did try to do this with an sniffer but it goes as far as the yahoo messenger server. Thanks Tony Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12536&t=12536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
The labs are a collaborative effort and they do have at least one CCIE on board. You have "heard" that Marc Russell hasn't passed the labs several times. If I tell you to buy Cisco stock right now are you going to do that? I don't know, your post seems to be just an excuse to start a flame war. That's not needed here. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Yhladi Ghfaskovich" To: Sent: Monday, 16 July, 2001 15:06 Subject: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] > I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on practice > labs. > It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why > would > you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have > heard > that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat the > purpose? > If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study tools?. > His > product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does > anyone > have any experience with some of the other products out there? > > Thank you, > Yhladi Ghfaskovich > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12538&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]
I'm going to assume that the router ignored the last '2' so you effectively typed 0x2104. But, since the thrid and fourth bit positions in the last nibble aren't used, this is the same as 0x2100. On a 2600/3600 that would cause it to boot to ROM monitor mode. I'm not sure what it does on a 1601. :-) Try sending a break signal and see if you can get it to drop to rommon (or whatever similar mode the 1601 has) and then reset the config register from there. Good luck! John >>> "Richard Bosire" 7/16/01 1:58:57 PM >>> Hellos' I have a cisco 1601 router which I entered confreg 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 during password recovery. Now, when i reboot the router I am getting CCC on the console !!! Anyone come across this before cheers ./bosire -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12539&t=12534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIP2 [7:12540]
Does anyone know if the VIP2 supports Gigabit ethernet? I have a 7507 that I need to put Gigabit Ethernet in but I only see a card for the VIP4. Can anyone confirm this? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12540&t=12540 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526]
maybe they don't want to pass. Then they couldn't go anymore, if you know what I mean. Do you know what I mean. how are you doin? Waas up - Original Message - From: "Raul F. Fernandez-IGLOU" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: Re: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] > The labs in my humble opinion are good. I use them. They make you think and > are excellent material to help in the pursuit of the CCIE. Like everyhting > else, these labs are just tools and these tools will only get you so far. A > combination of reading, a lot of configuration(hands on) and > troubleshooting(hands on) and a little luck are keys. If I were you though, > I would worry about passing the CCIE written first. Anyway, why call him a > clown? I dont know the guy personally but you should be a bit more polite. > > Raul > - Original Message - > From: "Yhladi Ghfaskovich" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:06 PM > Subject: CCBOOTCAMP Labs [7:12526] > > > > I am looking to start my CCIE study and have done some research on > practice > > labs. > > It seems that the CCBOOTCAMP labs are the best known to this list. Why > > would > > you buy this lab kit from someone who hasn't passed the CCIE lab? I have > > heard > > that Marc Russell has failed the lab several times. Doesn't this defeat > the > > purpose? > > If this clown didn't pass the labs why would you go to him for study > tools?. > > His > > product is also much more expensive than the other options out there. Does > > anyone > > have any experience with some of the other products out there? > > > > Thank you, > > Yhladi Ghfaskovich > > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12541&t=12526 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448]
I too have a similar problem that is yet unresolved. Mine however seems to be to any site hosted by criticalpathway.net. Try pinging that smtp.whateversiteitis.com or change smtp to mail and see if criticalpathway.net ends up in the name. - Original Message - From: "Ayers, Michael" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:08 AM Subject: RE: Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448] > I've seen this error with the Microsoft DNS caching servers and some > Internet Unix boxes. Seems to be a DNS compatibility issue. > > Here is the Scenario. You have a Microsoft DNS server that your exchange > server uses? If so, try adding another Internet DNS server to the Exchange > server's DNS server search order. > > > > > Thank You, > > > Michael Ayers > Network Engineer > > OneNeck IT Services > (480) 539-2203 > (800) 272-3077 > > > -Original Message- > From: Raees Ahmed Shaikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 10:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Off Topic: DNS issue !!! [7:12448] > > Dear Friends, > > I am facing a very strange problem with our Mailing System Exchange5.5sp4. > The issue is that we are not able to send email message to some of the sites > on the internet. Most of the other popular sites , you can say 90% of the > sites are reachable by our email clients. But when the clients try to send > message to those few site, they get and Non-Delivery-Report saying that the > mail could not be delivered. Strange enough that email address is > reachable through yahoo, hotmail and other sites. > > I have checked our router for any access-list blocking but I am sure nothing > is of that sort, no access-lists are controlling those addresses. Our ISP > from whom we are connected to the internet is also able to reach that sites. > But we using the ISP's DNS servers for name resolution cannot connect to > those particular hosts. > > One strange behavior though, when I tried to trace route a website add, for > that particular mail host, I is taking more than 15 hops and then declared > unreachable by our Static Router, No Dynamic protocol is running between us > and our ISP, we are using default route. > > Any help or insights would be valuable and really be appreciated. > > I know this has nothing to do with Cisco, but the fact is Applications, and > User Usability is driving the Technology. so this mail is not so uncommon > for a Cisco SE. > > Thanks and Regards, > > S. Raees > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of > Glacier Bkgrd.jpg] > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or > attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do > not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, > conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the > official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor > endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12542&t=12448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]
Try this: 2104 and 2102 should look the same, but 1042 would get you 1200 baud. Try setting your console to 1200 and see if it works Michael -Original Message- From: Richard Bosire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534] Hellos' I have a cisco 1601 router which I entered confreg 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 during password recovery. Now, when i reboot the router I am getting CCC on the console !!! Anyone come across this before cheers ./bosire -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12543&t=12534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
I like Jeremy's answer. It seems like the permit all at the end makes everything else except the denies redundant. ""Jeremy Felt"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a familiar feeling that I'm going to be completely off on this one, > but hopefully the correct answer will be posted so I can figure out why. > > As long as the correct "deny" statements are there, it seems to me that the > other "permit" statements would be redundant when used with the "permit all" > statement at the end. > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > Looking forward to the answer, > > - Jeremy Felt > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Fowler" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM > Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > > > > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at > it > > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > > Have fun... > > > > > > Thank You, > > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12544&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
Oh wait...4th line down is a permit so line 3 stays. I see it in 4 lines. Anybody else see it differently? - Original Message - From: "Allen May" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:44 PM Subject: Re: Access List problem. [7:12525] > I'll try ;) > > Let's see: > 172.anything from 10.anything > 172.22.30.95 from 10.11.12.anything (redundant from above line) > 172.22.30.anything denied from 192.168.18.27 > 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 from 192.168.18.anything (denied 1 line above) > 172.22.anything deny 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 (taken care of 2 lines above) > permit all > > So yeah...line 1, 3, and final permit all looks like it to me... > > Allen > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Fowler" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM > Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > > > > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at > it > > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > > Have fun... > > > > > > Thank You, > > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12545&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DNS and Firewalls [7:12547]
Greetings all, Looking for methods to inform outside users that our network is down, complete outage. Assuming users visiting our website, they'll redirected and flagged with a banner advising network is down for now. This method needs to be fully automated. Do you guys have any suggestion? Thanks for your time. Nabil I hope my request is clear! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12547&t=12547 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
True, but it won't block the specific addresses inside the subnets he allowed all from above the deny all. - Original Message - From: "no mail" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Access List problem. [7:12525] > I like Jeremy's answer. It seems like the permit all at the end makes > everything else except the denies redundant. > > > ""Jeremy Felt"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have a familiar feeling that I'm going to be completely off on this one, > > but hopefully the correct answer will be posted so I can figure out why. > > > > As long as the correct "deny" statements are there, it seems to me that > the > > other "permit" statements would be redundant when used with the "permit > all" > > statement at the end. > > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > Looking forward to the answer, > > > > - Jeremy Felt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Robert Fowler" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM > > Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > > > > > > > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring > at > > it > > > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > > > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 > 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > Have fun... > > > > > > > > > Thank You, > > > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12546&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]
The original problem may be that the register may be confused from too many digits in the config register. You tried to enter 0x21042. Remember that it is a 16bit register and can only accept 4 hex characters. Do the break sequence and reset it to the desired configuration. This link describes the config register in detail. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2000/c2000 qs/22812.htm -Original Message- From: Ayers, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534] Try this: 2104 and 2102 should look the same, but 1042 would get you 1200 baud. Try setting your console to 1200 and see if it works Michael -Original Message- From: Richard Bosire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534] Hellos' I have a cisco 1601 router which I entered confreg 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 during password recovery. Now, when i reboot the router I am getting CCC on the console !!! Anyone come across this before cheers ./bosire -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12548&t=12534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access List problem. [7:12525]
The first 3 conditions definitely don't overlap, so the deny is all you need, but the next 2 lines kind of overlap, and using only the deny statement (line 5) would block traffic that the prior permit statement (line 4) would have allowed. The only way to get rid of one of the lines is to see if there is a real weird wildcard mask that could do a deny that looks like the permit and deny together, but I can't see it right off. DON'T DELETE LINE 4! The remaining deny statement would deny all traffic from 172.22.x.y to hosts 64-128 on the 192.168.18 network. Line 4 would have allowed the hosts from 172.22.0-31.x to all of the 192.168.18.x network. These conditions overlap and need to be there separately. access-list 101 permit ip host 172.22.30.6 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at it > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > Have fun... > > > Thank You, > Robert Fowler Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12550&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
Thanks for the vote of support. I'm still very new at this. However, I have this habit of second guessing myself all the time, and I'm pretty sure my response was incorrect. The first two permit statements can be considered redundant because there are no deny statements leading to the "10.0.0.0" network. So that means the 3 statements relating to network "192.168.18.0" need to be reworked into 2. The first statement denies ip traffic from "172.22.30.0-172.22.30.255" access to the node "192.168.18.27". The second statement permits ip traffic from "172.22.0.0-172.22.31.255" to access any nodes from "192.168.18.0-192.168.18.255", this exludes the traffic denied already above. The third statement denies ip traffic from "172.22.0.0-172.22.255.255" access to any nodes from "192.168.18.64-192.168.18.127". If the second statement is taken out, then the third statement denies it before it is able to get to the permit all statement. In order for the second statement to be taken out, the third statement needs to be modified so that traffic from "172.22.32.0-172.22.255.255" is denied access to any nodes from "192.168.18.64-192.168.18.127". I don't know if this can be done by using a wildcard mask though, and I'm not able to figure it out. Sorry about the length, hopefully somebody can post the correct answer this time. :-p - Jeremy Felt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "no mail" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:41 PM Subject: Re: Access List problem. [7:12525] > I like Jeremy's answer. It seems like the permit all at the end makes > everything else except the denies redundant. > > > ""Jeremy Felt"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have a familiar feeling that I'm going to be completely off on this one, > > but hopefully the correct answer will be posted so I can figure out why. > > > > As long as the correct "deny" statements are there, it seems to me that > the > > other "permit" statements would be redundant when used with the "permit > all" > > statement at the end. > > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > Looking forward to the answer, > > > > - Jeremy Felt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Robert Fowler" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM > > Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] ...[snipped message]... > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 > 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > Have fun... > > > > > > > > > Thank You, > > > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12549&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
After thinking on it a bit more, the wildcard mask I would use if it were legal would be 0.0.223.255 This seems to accomplish the task, though according to my knowledge, it's not useable. So now I'm with Allen in 4 lines, not 3. - Jeremy Felt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Felt" To: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:22 PM Subject: Re: Access List problem. [7:12525] ...[snip message]. > In order for the second statement to be taken out, the third statement needs > to be modified so that traffic from "172.22.32.0-172.22.255.255" is denied > access to any nodes from "192.168.18.64-192.168.18.127". I don't know if > this can be done by using a wildcard mask though, and I'm not able to figure > it out. > > Sorry about the length, hopefully somebody can post the correct answer this > time. :-p > > - Jeremy Felt > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - Original Message - > From: "no mail" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:41 PM > Subject: Re: Access List problem. [7:12525] > > > > I like Jeremy's answer. It seems like the permit all at the end makes > > everything else except the denies redundant. > > > > > > ""Jeremy Felt"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I have a familiar feeling that I'm going to be completely off on this > one, > > > but hopefully the correct answer will be posted so I can figure out why. > > > > > > As long as the correct "deny" statements are there, it seems to me that > > the > > > other "permit" statements would be redundant when used with the "permit > > all" > > > statement at the end. > > > > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 > 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > > > > Looking forward to the answer, > > > > > > - Jeremy Felt > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Robert Fowler" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM > > > Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > > ...[snipped message]... > > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > > > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 > > 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > > > Have fun... > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank You, > > > > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12552&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
