Re: Why use wildcard mask [7:30597]
you must be a remarkable individual to be able to take such pride in being such a negative person, such a sorry sniper, and such a whiny crybaby loser. sooner or later you will be outed, and then perhaps we will be rid of you forever. Enjoy hiding as long as you can, chicken stuff. As they like to say on the Yahoo boards, PLONK ( list filter engaged ) Chuck Cisco Cisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here is a little wit and wisdom. There isn't enough RFCs or books in the world to help you pass the CCIE lab. We will be waiting for your third I failed the CCIE lab AGAIN e-mail. BTW... Your New Year's resolution should be to consider minding your own business. Chuck Larrieu wrote: Speaking only for myself, I look forward to your wit and wisdom when providing us wannabees with the knowledge we so desperately seek. While you're at it, can you provide us with a list of the RFC's you have written? And the books? I'd like to check them out. Anything to improve my own understanding of how things work. Best wishes, Chuck Cisco Cisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Howard, If you actually worked on a router in the real world rather than just tell people you do, you would know that Cisco has supported access-list remarks for some time now. Oh I'm sure you're going to reply to this e-mail with some stupid story like, This reminds me when I was talking to a developer at Apple about Mac OS 1.0 but I had never really worked on an Apple or some worthless story like that. Also do us all a favor and quit cross posting from other mailing list. We don't want to see your replies to the juniper and ccie mailing list posts. Cross posting can be dangerous when you're on some of the list the you are on wink, wink ;-) Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Yes, it does make simple tasks a little more complicated. However, using inverse masking can make complex tasks much easier. Take this issue. Say you are asked to filter access to all odd 192.168.x.0 /24 routes. Your method. 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: I see your approach, Marc, and I have even encountered real-world situations where such filtering might be appropriate. It happened when an enterprise wanted to leave room for expansion, but didn't understand summarization. They assigned odd-numbered subnets to different sites/areas, thinking the even ones would be for future use. My approach, incidentally, is to figure out the number of potential areas or sites, then divide by a power of 2, at least 4, to be summarization-friendly. There's no question that your approach takes fewer lines of code. Personally, I wouldn't use it except in a huge network where there was no other way to fit that many lines into NVRAM. My motivation for not doing so is maintainability. The more complex the mask, the more difficult it will be for some subsequent administrator to figure out what was being done. I might be more open to the idea if Cisco saved comments with the configuration, but, of course, it doesn't. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30608t=30597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Portal management [7:30601]
Sorry, how is this remotely related to Cisco certifications ? Omer Ehsan Dar wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi everyone, Happy new year to you all. Could you send me URLs of sites that help teach you how to manage portals and the building blocks of portals and the issues involved. Thanks Omer Ehsan Dar Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30610t=30601 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No Display on CE570 [7:30611]
Hi I am using a refurbished Cisco Cache Engine 570.The problem is that the thers is no display on the screen when i connect it through hyper terminal.All the settings and the console cable are OK.The system Led is constant OFF. The system has not been configured and has the default confiuguration, so no telnet . Can anyone suggests what can be the problem..If console port is damaged, how can we check it through multimeter or any other tool.. Any help .I have been given a task to bring it to life ..Somebody help me . Ziyaad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30611t=30611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: simple ip monitor [7:30433]
Whatsup Gold seems expensive for what it is though. Or at least it was last I heard. There are shareware/freeware packages which come very close. Servers Alive, I used a while ago, which at that time was free for up to ten devices and very cheap for over ten. I tried a load of others at the same time for a specific task. Servers Alive came out on top at the time as it was one of the few that as well as being able to execute a command line on failure of a device (which most of the packages allowed), it also allowed the same on recovery of the device (which a lot of the others did not). It also converted and ran well as a service. Kiwi's Cat Tools very handy too. Don't get me wrong. We run all sorts of management applications which we pay through the nose for (HP NNM, CWSI2000), but there are times when the task fits a cheaper solution, and one that doesn't take a week to install and configure. Anybody else found useful cheaper solutions? Gaz Hire, Ejay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What'sUpGold. Couldn't live without it. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: simple ip monitor [7:30433] Cisco will be comming out with DHRP which will do just that. 2387 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, I am looking for a simple program to monitor an ip and email me when it goes up or down. Can anyone recommend a very basic program like this? thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30612t=30433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN Authentication Error with Win2K Domain Controller [7:30613]
Hi All , I want my remote mobile client ie a lap top with Win Me , to log in to the Domain of Win2K of the HQ. I am successfully able to create the tunnel from the client end to the router , but I am not able to authenticate with the Domain Controller , as I am gettign an error which says that No Domain Controller is available to authenticate . Once I click on OK , I can ping to the Ip address of the domain controller and other PCs I have disabled the bindings for Ethernet on my local mobile PC , but I am still getting the same error. I still cnat figure out the error I am making , I am able to log on with that same Lap top to the Ethernet of the Corp Hq and my policies on Win2K DC permit me to log on via Dial up and VPN . Any one else who has faced a similar problem , please help me out . thanks, -- Navin Parwal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30613t=30613 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco LRE ( Long Reach Ethernet ) [7:30553]
For those without the benefit of the prices to hand: The 24 port 2924 LRE switches work out at around 4000 GBP list and the 575 termination boxes work out at under 200 GBP list (surprisingly for Cisco) Suppose it depends on how much upheaval you will save by using it. Gaz Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... if you're in the San Francisco area, I can think of quite a few hotels where this would make sense. Places like the Fairmont or the Mark Hopkins aren't going to disrupt their guests and their revenue stream for rewiring. Of course there would be the problem of prying the dollars out of their managements' hands to pay for it. ;- three or four years ago I was personally humiliated because I trusted the telecom guy at one of the big hotels in town that he would be able to deliver a simple ethernet connection from his telco room to a particular conference room. Of couse he couldn't and the connection to the internet failed. ( don't ask - I was dragged in at the last minute because somebody else who had no clue was on the path to destruction, and I stupidly agreed to try to bail him out ) In any case, something like this would have been the perfect solution, assuming that the wiring in general was not corroded too badly, or the rats hadn't munched it into uselessness. And in this particular hotel, that was a distinct possibility. :- Chuck Bolton, Travis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Very interesting technology. Maybe I should start my own consulting company to install these devices in hotels and make my million :-) -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Cisco LRE ( Long Reach Ethernet ) [7:30553] Is it slow at work today or what? I was browsing CCO and ran across something called long reach ethernet http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts_122701.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/solutions/long_ethernet/ lots more. Interesting product and market. Interesting, because on the surface, it doesn't seem like it would be less expensive than re-wiring, but if one looks at someplace like a hotel, where ripping walls out to string a new wiring infrastructure would be exceedingly disruptive, it makes sense. Anyone looked into this? done it? this appears to be a very new product to Cisco. the web docs are dated within the last few weeks. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30614t=30553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why use wildcard mask [7:30597]
Cisco Cisco You leave me with a quandry little man. It's very easy to filter you straight in to junk e-mail, but... Receiving your posts cheers me up. Life is good at the moment, very good, but no matter how bad things could get in the future, I don't think I could become as bitter and twisted as you. Life has obviously not dealt you a good hand, but the lucky ones amongst us can enjoy the poetic justice that you've probably got what you deserve. Happy New Year! Gaz (Not anonymous - In fact I hope to meet you one day - for a laugh!) Cisco Cisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here is a little wit and wisdom. There isn't enough RFCs or books in the world to help you pass the CCIE lab. We will be waiting for your third I failed the CCIE lab AGAIN e-mail. BTW... Your New Year's resolution should be to consider minding your own business. Chuck Larrieu wrote: Speaking only for myself, I look forward to your wit and wisdom when providing us wannabees with the knowledge we so desperately seek. While you're at it, can you provide us with a list of the RFC's you have written? And the books? I'd like to check them out. Anything to improve my own understanding of how things work. Best wishes, Chuck Cisco Cisco wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Howard, If you actually worked on a router in the real world rather than just tell people you do, you would know that Cisco has supported access-list remarks for some time now. Oh I'm sure you're going to reply to this e-mail with some stupid story like, This reminds me when I was talking to a developer at Apple about Mac OS 1.0 but I had never really worked on an Apple or some worthless story like that. Also do us all a favor and quit cross posting from other mailing list. We don't want to see your replies to the juniper and ccie mailing list posts. Cross posting can be dangerous when you're on some of the list the you are on wink, wink ;-) Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Yes, it does make simple tasks a little more complicated. However, using inverse masking can make complex tasks much easier. Take this issue. Say you are asked to filter access to all odd 192.168.x.0 /24 routes. Your method. 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: I see your approach, Marc, and I have even encountered real-world situations where such filtering might be appropriate. It happened when an enterprise wanted to leave room for expansion, but didn't understand summarization. They assigned odd-numbered subnets to different sites/areas, thinking the even ones would be for future use. My approach, incidentally, is to figure out the number of potential areas or sites, then divide by a power of 2, at least 4, to be summarization-friendly. There's no question that your approach takes fewer lines of code. Personally, I wouldn't use it except in a huge network where there was no other way to fit that many lines into NVRAM. My motivation for not doing so is maintainability. The more complex the mask, the more difficult it will be for some subsequent administrator to figure out what was being done. I might be more open to the idea if Cisco saved comments with the configuration, but, of course, it doesn't. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30615t=30597 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDP CID Exam [7:29527]
hi Jianliang Have you taken your CID I am intrested to study and xchange ideas with you , u can mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you are interested regards, suaveguru --- Jianliang Li wrote: Passed CCNP recently and now attacking CCDP exam. I'm using Cisco CID Exam Certification Guide and bought BOSON CID tests #1 and #3. Some quick questions: 1. The CID book doesn't have answers to Do I Know this Already questions. What happened? 2. SNA: The CID book isn't good enough for me to understand SNA. What are the best resources for quickly learning SNA? URLs? 3. StrataCOM: Any good URLs for StrataCOM? I'm also looking for a few people to study together by e-mail. If you plan to take CID exam in 2-4 weeks and are interested to join a small group, please reply to me directly. As a small group, we can exchange information and help each other without going through hundreds of messages everyday. I will drop off from the list after I post this message. Thank you! Jianliang Li __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30616t=29527 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Certificationzone.com : This is a rip off [7:30560]
Would probably be more useful for you to contact certificationzone on this.. Just a minor issue... james mensah wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hey Folks, Am l alone in this? My year old subscription to Certificationzone.com ends on Dec 31 2001 EST. It is just 2:37pm EST Dec 31st and l have already been deleted from their database and l can't access the site. This is the error message am getting. OOPS! The Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you sign here My username and password has never changed. What is this suppose to mean? Jimmy The Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you The Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you can Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30609t=30560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Study Groups [7:30295]
HI Suranjith, Are you in Sri Lanka? My Husband Rukmal Fernando is currently in Sri Lanka setting up Cisco Training centers with universities in Sri Lanka. NuMatrix Inc will be providing upto CCIE taining in Sri Lanka. Visit www.practicelabs.net to see there site. You can e-mail him at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call him on 077-468204. Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30606t=30295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Certificationzone.com : This is a rip off [7:30560]
To avoid any appearance of conflict of interest, I let this through the moderation filter. Now, while I'm technical director for certzone, I haven't had anything to do with setting up the e-commerce part. You may have discovered an outright bug, and customer service, I'm sure, could help. I can't speak for the financial people either, but if you ask, they'll probably refund the prorated time -- about 9 1/2 hours of a one year subscription. But there is a lesson here relevant to router operations. As I say, I don't know the details of the e-commerce server that handles membership. As a consequence, I don't know exactly how its clock is set. While the certzone servers are physically in US Eastern time, they might be set to Zulu time. Look at any email message; the time is usually Zulu with an offset. When debugging router interactions, just being on the same time zone is something to check, and then, depending on how tight the interactions are, you may very well want to turn on NTP synchronization. Otherwise, you won't be sure about whether the chicken or the egg crossed the road first, or something like that. In the ongoing IETF BMWG work on routing convergence, we are hoping that NTP will be good enough to track protocol behavior, but some of the more statistically-minded researchers are worried that it will not. I'm hoping that most of our basic measurements can be done using NTP-synchronized routers as the source and sink of data, but other workers are pressing for GPS or other, more accurate time synchronization. But really...isn't the term ripoff a little strong? Or, should I say, no router rip :-) Happy new year. Hey Folks, Am l alone in this? My year old subscription to Certificationzone.com ends on Dec 31 2001 EST. It is just 2:37pm EST Dec 31st and l have already been deleted from their database and l can't access the site. This is the error message am getting. OOPS! The Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you sign here My username and password has never changed. What is this suppose to mean? Jimmy The Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you The Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you can Zone ID or Password you supplied could not be located in our database. This probably means you currently do not have a membership or subscription to the ZONE. If you think you may have made a mistake while entering either your Zone ID or Password, simply type them in the login box above and try again. If you are not yet a CertificationZone.com Member or Subscriber you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30617t=30560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Minumum Config for ISDN BRI [7:30589]
I would think that you would need at least a dialer map statement on each router pointing back to the other router. ex dialer-map ip 172.16.1.1 name r2 broadcast even though I think that this is a spidless switch. You must still map the dial number to an ip try it ans see if it works Dennis McHugh Randy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In the BRS book it says there are only 5 minumum commands to get ISDN up and running and that is 2 global isdn switch-type basic-5ess and dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit and 3 interface dialer-group 1 dialer string 2001 ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0 I am having a hard time getting 2 routers with a bri's to talk accross an isdn switch with just those commands. Do I NEED to set the encapsulation to be ppp instead of the default hdlc? Do I NEED to set authentication either pap or chap with username password pairs for each routers? Do I NEED to make a map statment mapping het maping the ip of the local routers IP to the remote routers ISDN # to call? Thanks in advance ! Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30618t=30589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISIS study source! [7:30619]
Dear cisco guru, Any good study sources for ISIS except the one in Jeff Doyle?? Any comment is welcomed! Eriku Some of these references are not specifically for configuration, but will help in understanding. Radia Perlman's book, _Interconnections_. She designed ISIS. Peter van Oene's two-part tutorial series on CertificationZone, available to subscribers. An assortment of presentations at www.nanog.org by both Cisco and Juniper people. Do read anything by Dave Katz, who wrote the Cisco and Juniper ISIS code (as well as others) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30619t=30619 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP CASE [7:30620]
We are ISP with AS advertised in Ripe, and we have number of class C . A client want to use some class C of mine and he wants to BGP peer with me and advertise this classes to me. The client has its own registered AS in Ripe. How can we do that? Thanks and best regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30620t=30620 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
712 Register to win your Dream Vacation [7:30621]
CONGRATULATIONS! You have been selected as a finalist in the NVP Travel Giveaway! Prizes are accommodations for two for two nights at any one of the following locations: -- Ft. Lauderdale or Daytona, FL -- Williamsburg, VA -- Orlando, FL -- Las Vegas, NV -- Bahamas -- Branson, MO All you have to do is complete the finalists' registration form - be sure to include your Confirmation Number: G-862622. As an added bonus, the first 500 finalists to register will receive a free entry in one of our bonus drawings for $1,000.00 Cash or Plane Tickets for 4 Adults to any Continental U.S. Destination! Why wait? You could be on your way! CLICK HERE to Travel Today! Lisa Davidson National Vacation Promotions - Your screen name was entered in our giveaway. If you do not wish to participate in future promotions, please click here. Would you like loss weight while you sleep! Click Here! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30621t=30621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Minumum Config for ISDN BRI [7:30589]
You do NEED to define your SPIDs Dave John Neiberger wrote: It appears that the router is dialing but the calls are failing. Can we see the output of show isdn stat as well as debug isdn events and/or debug isdn q921 and debug isdn q931 ? John Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, McHugh Randy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is router 1 r1#sh run int bri 0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 124 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0 dialer string 2002 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-5ess end dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit r1#sh dialer BRI0 - dialer type = ISDN Dial String Successes FailuresLast DNIS Last status 2002 0 1000:10:08 failed Default 0 incoming call(s) have been screened. 0 incoming call(s) rejected for callback. BRI0:1 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle BRI0:2 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle r1# 01:30:17: BR0 DDR: cdp, 275 bytes, outgoing uninteresting (no list matched) 01:30:17: BR0 DDR: sending broadcast to default destination -- failed, not connected This is router 2 r2#sh run int bri 0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 124 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.0 dialer string 2001 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-5ess end dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit r2#sh dialer BRI0 - dialer type = ISDN Dial String Successes FailuresLast DNIS Last status 2001 0 200:16:14 failed Default 0 incoming call(s) have been screened. 0 incoming call(s) rejected for callback. BRI0:1 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle BRI0:2 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle I tried reversing the numbers for the dialer string like 2001 and 2002 on each router just in case I had the numbers for the dialer strings reversed but that did not help. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30622t=30589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP CASE [7:30620]
We are ISP with AS advertised in Ripe, and we have number of class C . A client want to use some class C of mine and he wants to BGP peer with me and advertise this classes to me. The client has its own registered AS in Ripe. How can we do that? Thanks and best regards A good first start would be to examine your customer's and your routing policies as recorded in the RIPE routing registry. The customer presumably already advertises its prefixes to other AS, and it needs to do the same to you. Assuming the customer's goal is to gain additional availability, you certainly need to readvertise those prefixes to your upstreams. If you have other customers that default to you, those connections need no changes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30623t=30620 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Minumum Config for ISDN BRI [7:30589]
A debug isdn q921 will help answer why your not communicating with the switch. McHugh Randy wrote: Can you guys give me some insight into what this might be telling me? r2#sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess ISDN BRI0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess Layer 1 Status: DEACTIVATED Layer 2 Status: Layer 2 NOT Activated Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8003 Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 4 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0 r1#sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess ISDN BRI0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 64, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8003 Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 0 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0 Still trying to make this work with the minumum 5 configuration commands:) -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30624t=30589 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Minumum Config for ISDN BRI [7:30589]
I'll need to do a quick search on CCO to verify this but I don't think the 5ESS switch uses SPIDs, but the DMS-100 and National ISDN-1 require them. IIRC, that is. I know there is a link on CCO that shows the differences between the switch types. Let me go look. Okay, here's a link similar to what I was remembering: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/1 600/1600icg/isdn.htm Regards, John Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Tue, 01 Jan 2002, MADMAN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: You do NEED to define your SPIDs Dave John Neiberger wrote: It appears that the router is dialing but the calls are failing. Can we see the output of show isdn stat as well as debug isdn events and/or debug isdn q921 and debug isdn q931 ? John Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, McHugh Randy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is router 1 r1#sh run int bri 0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 124 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0 dialer string 2002 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-5ess end dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit r1#sh dialer BRI0 - dialer type = ISDN Dial String Successes FailuresLast DNIS Last status 2002 0 1000:10:08 failed Default 0 incoming call(s) have been screened. 0 incoming call(s) rejected for callback. BRI0:1 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle BRI0:2 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle r1# 01:30:17: BR0 DDR: cdp, 275 bytes, outgoing uninteresting (no list matched) 01:30:17: BR0 DDR: sending broadcast to default destination -- failed, not connected This is router 2 r2#sh run int bri 0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 124 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 172.16.2.2 255.255.255.0 dialer string 2001 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-5ess end dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit r2#sh dialer BRI0 - dialer type = ISDN Dial String Successes FailuresLast DNIS Last status 2001 0 200:16:14 failed Default 0 incoming call(s) have been screened. 0 incoming call(s) rejected for callback. BRI0:1 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle BRI0:2 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle I tried reversing the numbers for the dialer string like 2001 and 2002 on each router just in case I had the numbers for the dialer strings reversed but that did not help. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You do NEED to define your SPIDs Dave John Neiberger wrote: It appears that the router is dialing but the calls are failing. Can we see the output of show isdn stat as well as debug isdn events and/or debug isdn q921 and debug isdn q931 ? John Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more href=http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag;http://www.ureach.com/reg/t ag On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, McHugh Randy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This is router 1 r1#sh run int bri 0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 124 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0 dialer string 2002 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-5ess end dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit r1#sh dialer BRI0 - dialer type = ISDN Dial String Successes Failures Last DNIS Last status 2002 0 10 00:10:08 failed Default 0 incoming call(s) have been screened. 0 incoming call(s) rejected for callback. BRI0:1 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle BRI0:2 - dialer type = ISDN Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is idle r1# 01:30:17: BR0 DDR: cdp, 275 bytes, outgoing uninteresting (no list matched)
Re: Certificationzone.com : This is a rip off [7:30560]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In the ongoing IETF BMWG work on routing convergence, we are hoping that NTP will be good enough to track protocol behavior, but some of the more statistically-minded researchers are worried that it will not. I'm hoping that most of our basic measurements can be done using NTP-synchronized routers as the source and sink of data, but other workers are pressing for GPS or other, more accurate time synchronization. I thought the NTP stratum 1 reference clocks were about as accurate as one can get. Off topic a bit, but one of my installed utilities is an SNTP client that can use any public time source as a reference clock. I'm using NIST, NASA, or the USNO depending. Aren't these sources based on the atomic clocks that claim accuracy of 1 millisecond per century or so? http://www.arachnoid.com/abouttime/index.html ( several interesting free things here) free - subject to the terms of the license agreement http://www.arachnoid.com/careware/index.html ( something at least one person on this list needs to take to heart ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30626t=30560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dsn from cisco router? [7:30627]
I notice that on some of my routers i can ping internet addresses like: ping www.yahoo.com and get replies but on others i dont. Can someone tell me the reason for this? __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30627t=30627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627]
Hi Beth, Most likely they have the protocol ICMP echo being filtered. HTH Scott -Original Message- From: beth shriver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627] I notice that on some of my routers i can ping internet addresses like: ping www.yahoo.com and get replies but on others i dont. Can someone tell me the reason for this? __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30628t=30627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627]
if you have the ability to look at the running configuration, look for the command ip name-server [address] chances are good there is a direct correlation between the presence of this command and your ability to ping domain names. Chuck beth shriver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I notice that on some of my routers i can ping internet addresses like: ping www.yahoo.com and get replies but on others i dont. Can someone tell me the reason for this? __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30629t=30627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Time synchronization [7:30630]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In the ongoing IETF BMWG work on routing convergence, we are hoping that NTP will be good enough to track protocol behavior, but some of the more statistically-minded researchers are worried that it will not. I'm hoping that most of our basic measurements can be done using NTP-synchronized routers as the source and sink of data, but other workers are pressing for GPS or other, more accurate time synchronization. I thought the NTP stratum 1 reference clocks were about as accurate as one can get. Those clocks are. The question is the NTP timer in the router drifting away from the reference. Off topic a bit, but one of my installed utilities is an SNTP client that can use any public time source as a reference clock. I'm using NIST, NASA, or the USNO depending. Aren't these sources based on the atomic clocks that claim accuracy of 1 millisecond per century or so? http://www.arachnoid.com/abouttime/index.html ( several interesting free things here) free - subject to the terms of the license agreement http://www.arachnoid.com/careware/index.html ( something at least one person on this list needs to take to heart ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30630t=30630 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP CASE [7:30620]
If the client wants to use YOUR address block... this is probably the easiest $$$ you can earn... :-)) Tough luck to him though Ismail M Saeed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... We are ISP with AS advertised in Ripe, and we have number of class C . A client want to use some class C of mine and he wants to BGP peer with me and advertise this classes to me. The client has its own registered AS in Ripe. How can we do that? Thanks and best regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30631t=30620 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Cheating WAS -RE: Autosense this ... [7:30632]
Some while back someone posted a story of just the scenario that you hypothesized. I believe that the perp was in a stall on his cell phone when one of the proctors walked in. -Original Message- From: Brian Whalen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 12:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Autosense this ... (add to your knowledgebase) [7:30446] You have access to a phone during the test? I guess a cell call during a bathroom break could occur. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30632t=30632 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
session time-out for dial-up users at AS5300 [7:30633]
We set up a user profile with session-timeout=25560 at Radius but it does not apply at AS5300. Do you have any idea? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30633t=30633 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP CASE [7:30620]
I'm afraid this is turning into one of those operational realities where your best course of action is hiring a competent consultant to take you through the planning and implementation. Some of the issues that will need to be examined include: 1. Are you, the other ISP, both, or neither designated by RIPE NCC as Local Internet Registries? At least one LIR will have to work with the RIPE NCC. 2. I'm troubled by your repeated use of the term class, which has no place in discussions of Internet routing, and the term owned with relation to them. The terms prefixes and allocation (the latter versus assignment) MUST be understood here. If all the ISPs involved don't understand them fully, they can very well produce designs in which RIPE NCC won't allocate more address space in the future. 3. There's no discussion of aggregation requirements and the need of a multihoming policy that advertises some more-specifics. 4. It's unclear if a link failure should cause the complete shift of advertised prefixes. Would normal BGP suffice, or does one ISP need to use the Cisco conditional advertisement feature? 5. The coordination can't just be with RIPE or the relevant LIR; it has to involve the other ISP as well. If both ISPs don't agree to advertise pieces of each others' address spaces, and/or don't register policies in the RIPE NCC routing registry that reflects this, higher-level providers that generate filters from the routing registry may very well refuse some of your routes, the customer's routes, etc. You'll want to read all relevant RIPE NCC documents on multihoming and AS allocation policy. They do have classes that can help in part of this. Consider attending the RIPE meeting in Amsterdam later this month and meeting some of the key people -- you might get enough help informally to be OK. Thx for your fast reply Actually this customer has two links, one to me and the second to another ISP. Also he uses some classes owned by me and other classes owned by the other provider. The case is he needs to BGP peer with me and with the other provider and to advertise the whole classes (owned by me and the other provider) to me and the other provider. In case one of the links failed he will still get his all classes from the other provider So can u please advise what to do with Ripe to achieve this? Thanks and best regards _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ismail M Saeed Senior Network Engineer GEGA NET Tel. +202-4149771 ext.125 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Howard C. Berkowitz To: Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:20 PM Subject: Re: BGP CASE [7:30620] We are ISP with AS advertised in Ripe, and we have number of class C . A client want to use some class C of mine and he wants to BGP peer with me and advertise this classes to me. The client has its own registered AS in Ripe. How can we do that? Thanks and best regards A good first start would be to examine your customer's and your routing policies as recorded in the RIPE routing registry. The customer presumably already advertises its prefixes to other AS, and it needs to do the same to you. Assuming the customer's goal is to gain additional availability, you certainly need to readvertise those prefixes to your upstreams. If you have other customers that default to you, those connections need no changes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30634t=30620 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627]
AH!!! thats it! thank you! -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627] if you have the ability to look at the running configuration, look for the command ip name-server [address] chances are good there is a direct correlation between the presence of this command and your ability to ping domain names. Chuck beth shriver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I notice that on some of my routers i can ping internet addresses like: ping www.yahoo.com and get replies but on others i dont. Can someone tell me the reason for this? __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30635t=30627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why use wildcard mask [7:30597]
Heh heh... Tell me Kevin, what did you do before taking up IT? Lawyer? Writer of insurance policy fine print? Are you the creator of the pages of warranty and disclaimer information in 2-point print that accompany almost every purchase these days? JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/01/2002 10:29 am - Kevin_Cullimore@mck insey.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin_Cullimore cc: Sent by:Subject: Re: Why use wildcard mask [7:30597] [EMAIL PROTECTED] m 01/01/2002 05:46 pm Please respond to Kevin_Cullimore@mck insey.com Hm. At least two meta-issues in play here. 1. It remains to be seen whether or not someone can assimilate all extant written materials and possess the fleetness of thought required to fill in any functional gaps that might result from the difficulty of conveying knowledge/competence/expertise via purely representational means to a degree sufficient to pass the hands-on portion of the cert. Historically, Cisco has done a better job than all other established vendors bearing certification in making sure that people's knowledge transcends regurgitation, and has thus done a credible job of forcing people to assume that their high-level certs are not conferred upon those with inadequate amounts of real-world experience. Given a natural suspicion of all those involved in the process of developing educational psychometric materials (although, the behaviour output of the more famous members of the list has led me to suspend that almost involuntary mistrust where warranted), I'd almost be happy to see someone succeed, but I'd have to assume that the number of possible circumstances that would lead to such a result are dwarfed by incompatible/mutually exclusive sets of circumstances. In this specific case, many postings to this newsgroup would indicate that a voluminous amount of hands-on lab preparation time has been involved in the attempt referred to within the confines of your reply. I'm not sure whether or not someone with an impeccably accurate reading knowledge of router protocol behavior a set of skills honed by means of an optimal leveraging of a high-end lab setup might be able to successfully pass the CCIE lab exam. I suppose it would be interesting to know if, in addition to lower-level paper certs, there exist legitimately conferred virtual CCIE certs. In this specific case, many OTHER postings to this newsgroup would indicate-on behalf of the candidate-a non-trivial amount of relevant hands-on experience in production environments prior to the same attempts referenced during my last paragraph. I'd assume that it's an open question as to how much hands-on is sufficient to pass the lab, and that most judgements are rendered impossibly complex due to the profoundly symbiotic relationship between the representational hands-on knowledge that is most likely required to achieve the set of letters that provided an impetus for a study group in the first place. So, the relevance of your observation to the specific case is not clear. If you can productively do so, please clarify. 2. Regarding a suggested new year's resolution: While that specific notion has indeed saved the lives of a countless number of individuals throughout the course of western civilization, I'm not sure what constitutes your own business. In the case of a private conversation between yourself Howard where you explicitly discount the years of hands-on configuration, design troubleshooting experience as either too out of date or non-existent, a third party forwarding the message and intervening might legitimately be interpreted as NOT minding one's own business. When an individual (or group: I well remember days of three individuals owning three aol accounts would sit behind three computers plugged into the same lan, sitting in the same room, would be able to to join chat rooms hosted by AOL swap seats to provide a completely different point of view some well-needed intellectual discontiguity to a conversation that started off its existence well beyond stale) replies to a newsgroup posting, notions of privacy and exclusivity are indeed compromised by an implicit adherence to the operational design of the newsgroup. If you had a constructive
RIF RC Field Question [7:30637]
All, Is the length field in the RC of a RIF the total size of the RIF or the total size of the RD? According to the Rossi paper it is the total length of the RIF. Pg 5 Bits 12-8 (next 5) bits descrige the total length of the RIF represented in bytes Example from the Rossi paper : 0830 00a1 014f 01e0 (Page 5) However, in the Lammle/Swartz Study guide it is the total length of the RD. Pg 694 The Length field is the number of bytes used by the route descriptors. Example from the Study Guide : 0490 020b 1000 (answer C question 20) Any and all help would be appreciated. Thanks js Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30637t=30637 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Routing help??? [7:30311]
Sybex's is best for CCNA only. For CCNP and other, use Cisco Press and you'll be happier. I gained my CCNP by reading Cisco Press, and I 've never failed once. So Cisco Press, Cisco Press and... Cisco Press. From: Tel Khan Reply-To: Tel Khan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Routing help??? [7:30311] Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:50:01 -0500 Hi Folks, Can anyone tell me the passmark for the 640-503 exam, as i have been told its changed from 690 to ??? Also i have been using the sybex CCNP is this book ok as i have been getting a mixed response. i have read the book a couple of times. so my question is should i stick with this book or buy the cisco press an use that? Thanks in advance Tehlet H A P P Y N E W Y E A R ! !!! _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30638t=30311 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIF RC Field Question [7:30637]
folks looking into RIF's might want to check out Fred Ingham's paper, found in the Groupstudy referece lists: http://www.groupstudy.com/notes/notepages/rif2.html the field in question is the total length of the RIF. Much as I hate to say it publicly, Sybex and Todd Lammle books of late have been of very poor quality. The text is filled with errors, many of which are pretty basic. I have good reason to believe that Sybex puts a very low value on the technical review process, which is supposed to catch all these errors. But to be truthful, things like this shouldn't be showing up anyway. It's not real hard to doublecheck facts, like what the RIF length field does, and whether or not a domain with a single OSPF area requires an area 0 or not. I'd take Rossi and Ingham over Lammle every time, especiall over the last year or so. Chuck Jason wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, Is the length field in the RC of a RIF the total size of the RIF or the total size of the RD? According to the Rossi paper it is the total length of the RIF. Pg 5 Bits 12-8 (next 5) bits descrige the total length of the RIF represented in bytes Example from the Rossi paper : 0830 00a1 014f 01e0 (Page 5) However, in the Lammle/Swartz Study guide it is the total length of the RD. Pg 694 The Length field is the number of bytes used by the route descriptors. Example from the Study Guide : 0490 020b 1000 (answer C question 20) Any and all help would be appreciated. Thanks js Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30639t=30637 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:unable to ping our BRI Port ???? [7:30640]
Hello all and wish u happy new year. I am new to this group I am facing a problem currently and might be even silly to you all experts. I have 3640 router connected to one of our other office via ISDN I can ping the next routers bri port but I am unable to ping my own bri port. why is it so ? thx in advance parag Download Logos, Picture Messages Ringtones for your mobile phone Visit http://mobile.yahoo.co.in Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30640t=30640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Certificationzone.com : This is a rip off [7:30560]
Chuck, the problem is that the PC / Router / etc clock could achieve the same accuracy even with a stratum 1 reference.. Also, I believe that there is a issue about latency as well Sort of if I said NOW, do I mean NOW when I said it or do I mean NOW when you hear it.. :-)) . I believe that's the problem Howard was talking about below Jason Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In the ongoing IETF BMWG work on routing convergence, we are hoping that NTP will be good enough to track protocol behavior, but some of the more statistically-minded researchers are worried that it will not. I'm hoping that most of our basic measurements can be done using NTP-synchronized routers as the source and sink of data, but other workers are pressing for GPS or other, more accurate time synchronization. I thought the NTP stratum 1 reference clocks were about as accurate as one can get. Off topic a bit, but one of my installed utilities is an SNTP client that can use any public time source as a reference clock. I'm using NIST, NASA, or the USNO depending. Aren't these sources based on the atomic clocks that claim accuracy of 1 millisecond per century or so? http://www.arachnoid.com/abouttime/index.html ( several interesting free things here) free - subject to the terms of the license agreement http://www.arachnoid.com/careware/index.html ( something at least one person on this list needs to take to heart ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30641t=30560 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1 [7:30642]
Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web20908.mail.yahoo.com; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:24 -0800 (PST) X-Track: 1: 40 Received: from 202.163.99.184 (EHLO company.mail) (202.163.99.184) by mta442.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from gacpak.com [10.1.0.10] by company.mail [10.1.1.157] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.1.T) for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:49:00 +0500 Received: from ccMail by gacpak.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7) id A1009928999; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:50:08 +0500 X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:51:46 +0500 From: To: , Subject: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail Note Part X-MDRemoteIP: 10.1.0.10 X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 474 Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30642t=30642 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, [7:30643]
Looks like http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/itg_medi.pdf has some tips to try. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, SA J wrote: Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web20908.mail.yahoo.com; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:24 -0800 (PST) X-Track: 1: 40 Received: from 202.163.99.184 (EHLO company.mail) (202.163.99.184) by mta442.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from gacpak.com [10.1.0.10] by company.mail [10.1.1.157] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.1.T) for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:49:00 +0500 Received: from ccMail by gacpak.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7) id A1009928999; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:50:08 +0500 X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:51:46 +0500 From: To: , Subject: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail Note Part X-MDRemoteIP: 10.1.0.10 X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 474 Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30643t=30643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, [7:30644]
I would be suspicious of the cable at the failure site also, and do your duplex settings match.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Brian Whalen wrote: Looks like http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/itg_medi.pdf has some tips to try. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, SA J wrote: Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web20908.mail.yahoo.com; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:24 -0800 (PST) X-Track: 1: 40 Received: from 202.163.99.184 (EHLO company.mail) (202.163.99.184) by mta442.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from gacpak.com [10.1.0.10] by company.mail [10.1.1.157] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.1.T) for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:49:00 +0500 Received: from ccMail by gacpak.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7) id A1009928999; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:50:08 +0500 X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:51:46 +0500 From: To: , Subject: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail Note Part X-MDRemoteIP: 10.1.0.10 X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 474 Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30644t=30644 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E1 Terms [7:30645]
Dear group, I am confused for some of the terms related to E1 lines. Can some one tell me the differences between these terms. a) Multichannel E1 Normal E1 b) Fractional E1 Channelized E1 c) Clear Channel unchannelized E1 Thanx in advance Amar Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30645t=30645 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cleared my CCNA 2.0 with 978 ..thanx to every one !! [7:30646]
=20 best wishes Ayushman =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Ivy.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30646t=30646 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Routing help??? [7:30311]
buy the Cisco Press book . For 640-503, use both the Preparation Library and the Certification guide. -Original Message- From: Dave W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: mercredi 2 janvier 2002 2:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP Routing help??? [7:30311] Sybex's is best for CCNA only. For CCNP and other, use Cisco Press and you'll be happier. I gained my CCNP by reading Cisco Press, and I 've never failed once. So Cisco Press, Cisco Press and... Cisco Press. From: Tel Khan Reply-To: Tel Khan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Routing help??? [7:30311] Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:50:01 -0500 Hi Folks, Can anyone tell me the passmark for the 640-503 exam, as i have been told its changed from 690 to ??? Also i have been using the sybex CCNP is this book ok as i have been getting a mixed response. i have read the book a couple of times. so my question is should i stick with this book or buy the cisco press an use that? Thanks in advance Tehlet H A P P Y N E W Y E A R ! !!! _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30647t=30311 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passive Interface Help [7:30648]
Happy New Year!! I need a little help on what a passive interface is. From what I can gather, a passive interface does not advertise its route to its neighbor ? Now if that is the case, why can I still ping an interface that is set to passive. Please note: This is excluding directly connected routes. For example, I set my Cisco 2509 ethernet interface to passive. Why can I still ping the ethernet address from my neighboring router Cisco 4000 ? I am running IGRP. Why does the ethernet network show up in its routing table for my Cisco 4000. From poking around with the passive interface command it seems that I can not ping my ethernet address only if I set the Serial interfaces to passive also. This seems odd. I thought if I made an ethernet interface passive, I should not be able to ping it from a neighboring router or any other router since it is not being advertised. Below is a sample of me being able to ping serial 1 off my Cisco 2509 from my Cisco 4000. Serial 1 is not directly connected. Serial 1 is being advertised. Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Cisco2509 ! enable password router ! ip subnet-zero ipx routing 0010.7be8.22f4 ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 12.11.12.1 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast delay 1000 ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.18.1 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache ipx network 3 no fair-queue clockrate 100 ! interface Serial1 ip address 172.17.18.2 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 400 ! router igrp 1 passive-interface Ethernet0 passive-interface Serial0 passive-interface Serial1 offset-list 2 out 11000 Serial0 network 12.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 172.17.0.0 ! ip classless ! access-list 2 deny 12.11.12.1 ! ! ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line 1 8 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end Cisco2509# Cisco_4000ping 172.17.18.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.17.18.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 120/120/124 ms Cisco_4000ping 12.11.12.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.11.12.1, timeout is 2 seconds: . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Cisco_4000 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30648t=30648 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, [7:30649]
I havent worked with this mod before, heres a bit of useful info.. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:00:23 +0200 From: Andrew Larkins To: Brian Whalen Subject: RE: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, [7:306 43] The 1E2W module is a 10MB module - change the switch port speeds and duplex -Original Message- From: Brian Whalen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 07:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, [7:30643] Looks like http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/itg_medi.pdf has some tips to try. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, SA J wrote: Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web20908.mail.yahoo.com; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:24 -0800 (PST) X-Track: 1: 40 Received: from 202.163.99.184 (EHLO company.mail) (202.163.99.184) by mta442.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jan 2002 02:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from gacpak.com [10.1.0.10] by company.mail [10.1.1.157] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.1.T) for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:49:00 +0500 Received: from ccMail by gacpak.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7) id A1009928999; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:50:08 +0500 X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.30.00.7 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 15:51:46 +0500 From: To: , Subject: %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail Note Part X-MDRemoteIP: 10.1.0.10 X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 474 Hi All, Im facing one problem on our central site i.e currently im using Cisco 3640 router with fast ethernet module in it, its working perfect, but when i change the module i.e 1E2W no shuts the ethernet interface it, then the following scenario occurs! Router(config-if)# Router(config-if)#no shut Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0/0, changed state to up Router(config-if)#ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.0.0 Router(config-if)# %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. %AMDP2_FE-5-COLL: AMDP2/FE(0/0), Excessive collisions, TDR=1, TRC=0. Ethernet doesnt work properly! Excessive collisions occurs! but the same module is working alright on our brach office. Any Suggestions? Need solution urgently. Rgds, SAJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30649t=30649 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
