Re: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
I couldn't help myself, I have done the tech support side of this for a while and now take escalations on issues such as these, as well as teach others how to troubleshoot theses issues, so I thought I'd throw my two cents in, late as it may be. Everything I have read on this thread thus far, is true. Testing a circuit can, many times, clear up the problems that the customer may be seeing. On the other side of the coin, because of the fluctuant nature of Layer 1 and 2 equipment in provider networks, this can often cause what appears to be a fix, and becomes a chronic issue since tech-support groups work on numbers as well as MTTR. More often than not if it's up and pingable for 1-2 hours, this issue is marked as resolved. With that said, as mentioned earlier, look for bipolar violations, this can be a sign of a few things, but the exact cause can be hard to track down. If the issue continues beyond this weekend, I would suggest that you contact your provider and have a dispatch sent to your premise. But once they are there and they check the common problems, make SURE, they run a HEAD-TO-HEAD test for at LEAST 3 minutes per test pattern using 0's, 1's and either 1 in 8 or 3 in 24. When they do this and run clean, make sure there are errors sent from the far end to the onsite tech's test unit, and vise versa. Since your ISP and the circuit provider are more than likely different providers, make sure both are on the phone to ensure end-to-end testing. I am available offline if you need anything further Mike Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... They did another stress test last night at 11 PM together with the telco, and this time they didn't find any errors. They promised to monitor the line all night, and this morning when I checked the PVC, it had been up all night. I am leaving the case open a little bit longer though. As I don't have other things to do, one of the other branch offices connected the same way went down during the night. This office is located in an area where they have a different telco, so I am finding this too odd to be a coincidence, and it smells like a provider problem at this time. I have not heard back from their NOC yet, but I am warming up with cups of coffee here... In the meantime, I've had them power off their router, reseat both cables, and power it back on. Without any luck. With a telnet, their router shows the LMI being down, and there has been one AIS alarm, which tells me that some upstream equipment are faulty. Thanks for everyone's reply. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Lee James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829] If this becomes persistent, along with having the tech check the sj, Have them run head to head with his test set. Do it after hours if you do not have a backup line. Ole Drews Jensen wrote: Thanks Larry, I've asked the tech to call me anytime tonight when they've finished the test, and if the story is the same as earlier today, I will insist on having the telco dispatched to check the SmartJack. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:11 PM To: 'Ole Drews Jensen'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829] Ole, just a word of experience here, don't let this drag on too long without insisting that telco goes to the site and checks the smart jack CHASSIS. I have seen a slot or the whole chassis be the problem with this symptom many times. There is something about them that gives clear loopback tests from the 'front' (entry point from telco) of the smart jack card but they can only hardwire a loopback from the 'back' (exit point towards CSU). Of course, they will be obstinate towards this request. Larry Puckette Network Analyst CCNA,MCP,LANCP Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512/434-1838 -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]
IPX WAN and OSPF LOCAL-PREF [7:31011]
hi,everyone I have 2 questions, can you help me? The first question is when should I use the IPXWAN. The second is OSPF Local-preference. I find that the router prefer the EBGP routes over the routes which is the same received from the IBGP peers with higher LOCAL-PREF attribute. Why? Can you tell me? Thank a lot. Best regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31011t=31011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aaaarrgg! CiscoWorks2000/RME Troubles [7:31012]
maybe one on this list has had this happen to him and can console me or maybe I can warn someone not to do what I have done and what led to all the password in our ciscoworks installation to be overwritten with wrong ones never try the change attributes function, not even for user fields! I did, wanting all our routers (~ 1400) to be designated as such, so as to be able to distinguish the routers from the switches in a exported list of the inventory. this took endlessly then looking on the inventory file I was seriously flabbergasted to note that all the telnet passwords have been overwritten with the passwords of the one device which happened to be first on the list. no fun. no, I didn't do it accidentaly, there is no way to the change passwords screen if change user fields only is checked on the previous screen. by the way, is there someone at all who thinks RME is a useful tool, not for a few routers, but for say a few thousands? I got a bad feeling after 1 1/2 years experience with flaky and weird behaviour of the thing. for example all the device attribute errors from devices which have their credentials perfectly correctly stored. from Campus Manager on the other hand I got the feeling that it behaves more predictably and reliably, as well as the Cisco View part. perhaps there are other users who can tell me their experience cheers georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31012t=31012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On line Routers and Switches [7:31013]
Hi all, I haven't touched a router or switch in about 6 months and was wondering if someone had a lab setup on line that I could log into for a few hours so that I could brush up on my skills again. Please respond to the email below if you don't want to share it with the entire group. Thanks, Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCNP, MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31013t=31013 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to Block MSN ... [7:30891]
off. Brian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You could lock down the boxes, you know secure case monitoring, use nt/2k so only superuser can install software, disable floppy. I knew a company that tried that once. Turned out, the tech-savvy dudes responded by just bringing in their own personal laptops and used that to do the objectionable behavior - messenger, porn, Napster, games, whatever. It was pretty much untraceable when wireless Metricom Ricochet was still around. But even when that died, they just concealed themselves with a bunch of http proxies. And, now that I think about it, you don't even need to bring in your own computer at all. I heard of one guy who took his company PC and got into its BIOS (I believe he did a password-recovery to bypass the BIOS password the company set up), and he set the computer to boot from CD. He then went down to the local CompUSA, bought himself a super-cheapo hard-drive, hooked it to his company PC, and then, using his personal Windows CD, installed a fresh copy of Windows on that 2nd drive, dual-boot. So when he needed to access company resources, he would boot into the company-sanctioned Windows. When he wanted to 'do his thang', and he just needed internet access and not any company resources, he would boot into his renegade windows. The point is, that attempting to deal with employee behavior through purely technical means, without serious backing from HR, often results in a cat-and-mouse game, where, at the end of the day, users who want to goof off will eventually find a way to goof off no matter what. The larger your organization, the better the chance of being one guy working there who knows IT better than the IT department does. And like I said, once he figures out a way to beat the system, he invariably tells his buddies how, who then tell their buddies how, and before you know it the situation has pretty much reverted to what it was previously. Of course, I'm of the opinion that all this employee tracking is basically bullshi* anyway. If a guy is doing good work, who really cares if he spends all his time on IM? You might say that in some jobs, it is difficult to tell who's doing a good job and who isn't. But I would respond that in such situations, it is more productive to spend your time devising a method to measure job performance rather than spending time playing Big Brother with your employees. Bri - Original Message - From: Jarmoc, Jeff To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:20 AM Subject: RE: How to Block MSN ... [7:30891] But truly the best way is to simply have company policy that bans messenger. Because we all know that always works, right? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31010t=30891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31016]
Transfer $100/= to my paypal account and I'll get you off the list !! ;-) www.paypalwarning.com wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31016t=31016 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Comcast Cable newsgroup server? [7:31015]
anyone know the comcast newsgroup servers names? my mediaone was transferred to comcast, and my newsgroups are toast! i've obviously already tride news.comcast.net and news.comcast.com with no success. I wouldnt put this post here, but since I cant get to any other newsgroups at the moment, and have been on hold with comcast for 68 minutes now, it's getting a little frustrating (maybe I'll open up a TAC case and hope someone that works there knows the server name!) :) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31015t=31015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31017t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Comcast Cable newsgroup server? [7:31015]
This is precisely why I *pay* for my newsgroup access.. that and it's not filtered by some self rightous dork behind a desk. MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31018t=31015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA tutorial in beta for Cisco 2900 configura [7:30970]
Njamba Ti Ikere wrote: Hey Dude, Congrats for work well done ,I chanced on your tutorials yesterday and they were very good. However my only beef is that when you open a web page from within your site, you cannot maximize or minimize the browser screen. Otherwise the rest is very good and please do'nt deem me persnickety ; i just felt constricted and all. Again thanks for a worthy resource. Actually, they are resizable by the code.. you should be able to resize the window but no tool bar. BUT- I think I have a code issue somewhere else since you are correct. Dont you just love javascript? They do not resize properly even though the indicator is there for the resize. Not being a HTML geek, this might take a while to track down. ::sigh:: MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31019t=30970 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fore Power Supplies [7:31020]
I've got two new power supplies for Fore 2810 switch. The part number is 7902-00. Anyone interested in them before I find space in the dumpster? Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31020t=31020 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31021t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31022]
If you've tried everything, I can't help. If you think you might have missed one method, then try going to www.groupstudy.com and have a look down the right hand side for list manager. :-) HTH Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31022t=31022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
memorize packet structure [7:31023]
Is it necessary to memorize tcp/ip/udp/ppp etc,. packet structures for the CCIE test? Does anyone out therre know that stuff cold without using a sniffer? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31023t=31023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Will someone please take away me Catalyst 3900 [7:31014]
I'm not asking much on this. Just 1450$. You can log in and try it: ip address: 24.25.214.200 port 3900 I'm desperate for the money. It's being auctioned now on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1318417741 -Karen CCNA, CCIE Candidate __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31014t=31014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31024]
Sorry... this is a lifetime group list membership. The only way to get off the list is to die. Make that choice if you must. The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31024t=31024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31025]
Of course you'll have to let us know once you're dead. Look forward to hearing from you :-o Gaz c1sc0k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sorry... this is a lifetime group list membership. The only way to get off the list is to die. Make that choice if you must. The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31025t=31025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31026]
You can check out any time you want...but you can never leave...Welcome to the Hotel California:-) Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, c1sc0k1d ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sorry... this is a lifetime group list membership. The only way to get off the list is to die. Make that choice if you must. The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31026t=31026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: memorize packet structure [7:31023]
At 03:13 PM 1/5/02, Steven A. Ridder wrote: Is it necessary to memorize tcp/ip/udp/ppp etc,. packet structures for the CCIE test? Does anyone out therre know that stuff cold without using a sniffer? I do! But it's from years of using a sniffer. I don't think you need to know it for CCIE, although I think Cisco should fix that. You do need to know Token Ring RIFs cold for the written test. Now that's a useful skill! ;-) Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31027t=31023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31028]
He says that he's tried everything. That must mean that he's jumped out of an airplane without a parachute. Or, set himself on fire. I could go on, but everything would take too long to write out. :-) -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31025] Of course you'll have to let us know once you're dead. Look forward to hearing from you :-o Gaz c1sc0k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sorry... this is a lifetime group list membership. The only way to get off the list is to die. Make that choice if you must. The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31028t=31028 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31030t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPX WAN and OSPF LOCAL-PREF [7:31011]
I don't know anything about IPXWAN but maybe can help with the local preference thing. It boils down to administrative distance, which is the first thing examined. EBGP is 20, while IBGP is 200. So the router never gets to a point of looking at attributes such as local preference before tossing the IBGP route and keeping the EBGP route. The logic behind that, I think, is to keep packets from bouncing around inside of an AS before leaving - if the destination is external, just get on with it and get it out of here. Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31029t=31011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31031]
John, Your showing your age!! (grin) Classic just don't die -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31026] You can check out any time you want...but you can never leave...Welcome to the Hotel California:-) Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, c1sc0k1d ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sorry... this is a lifetime group list membership. The only way to get off the list is to die. Make that choice if you must. The k1d wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31031t=31031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
Have you put the addresses and masks in binary and tried to work it out for yourself? In the mask, 0 means don't care and 1 means must match. This is a quick answer due to a shortage of time and because I think you will learn best if you do it yourself. Priscilla At 05:38 PM 1/5/02, Hunt Lee wrote: Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31032t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
The first entry, by ending in .7, allows for 10.10.10.40-47, remember this is a span of 8. Then you need 48 and 49, hence the .1. The .40 and .48 are network addresses, I'll refer you to one of the many subnet calculators out there if thinking in binary is not yet second nature. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Hunt Lee wrote: Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31033t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
Think of it in the same terms as you would a normal subnet mask Lee. You want to permit address 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.49. 10.10.10.40 255.255.255.248 is equal to 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.47. Furthermore, 10.10.10.48 255.255.255.254 is equal to 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.48 thru 10.10.10.49. Try to always think binary. In this case the first range falls on an 8 bit boundary with the range 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. The second ranges starts on an 8 bit boundary with the range 0 1. You should now be able to see that as 0.0.0.7 and 0.0.0.1. Hope this helps. Hunt Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31034t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
Ok - here's what I understand so far: to permit range only 10.10.10.40 - 10.10.10.49 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 41 1 1 1 0 42 1 1 1 1 43 1 1 1 0 0 44 1 1 1 0 1 45 1 1 1 1 0 46 1 1 1 1 1 47 1 10 0 0 0 48 1 10 0 0 1 49 .. .. 1 11 1 1 1 63 Until I draw this out, I realize if I use 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.31 (16+8+4+2+1=31, the last 5 bits unchecked), it would include addresses all the way to 10.10.10.63 So then, I split off the first part 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 1 1 40 1 1 1 41 1 1 1 0 42 1 1 1 1 43 1 1 1 0 0 44 1 1 1 0 1 45 1 1 1 1 0 46 1 1 1 1 1 47 getting = 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 (4+2+1=7, the last 3 bits unchecked) - and since this includes the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.47, the next range will start with 10.10.10.48: 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 1 10 0 0 0 48 1 10 0 0 1 49 getting = 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 (the last 1 bit unchecked) - hence getting the range of 10.10.10.48 to 10.10.10.49 Am I on the right track? - and I'm very sorry for the long message (I just want you guys to check whether my processes are correct or not) And if I'm correct, is there any faster way than this? Thanks again. Hunt D. J. Jones wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Think of it in the same terms as you would a normal subnet mask Lee. You want to permit address 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.49. 10.10.10.40 255.255.255.248 is equal to 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.47. Furthermore, 10.10.10.48 255.255.255.254 is equal to 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.48 thru 10.10.10.49. Try to always think binary. In this case the first range falls on an 8 bit boundary with the range 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. The second ranges starts on an 8 bit boundary with the range 0 1. You should now be able to see that as 0.0.0.7 and 0.0.0.1. Hope this helps. Hunt Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly
Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]
Hunt, There are two schools of thought (at least). One of them involves thinking in binary, which I think is the more difficult, but depends how your mind works. I can work it out in binary on paper, but my head goes slower than the pen, so I use the second (and quickest) method: For the second method you have to think of everything in blocks (or chunks as I usually use because its unique and 'unconfusable' with any other term): The blocks can be 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 The only bit you have to do in your head is visualise how your addresses fit in to those blocks. I'll let someone else explain exactly how to visualise it as I will never be an instructor. My teaching methods sometimes have a negative effect. Sometimes irreversible :-) I think it's Leigh Anne Chisholm that has the way with the words. Once you've grasped it you'll wonder how you ever found it so difficult. All subnet calculations can be done in your head within a few seconds, except some none-contiguous wild cards (tricky some times). If you search the archives there are some good explanations though. Regards, Gaz D. J. Jones wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Think of it in the same terms as you would a normal subnet mask Lee. You want to permit address 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.49. 10.10.10.40 255.255.255.248 is equal to 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.40 thru 10.10.10.47. Furthermore, 10.10.10.48 255.255.255.254 is equal to 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 and includes the addresses 10.10.10.48 thru 10.10.10.49. Try to always think binary. In this case the first range falls on an 8 bit boundary with the range 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. The second ranges starts on an 8 bit boundary with the range 0 1. You should now be able to see that as 0.0.0.7 and 0.0.0.1. Hope this helps. Hunt Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Thanks for the response guys :) But can anyone explain to me how do you guys derive: 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be placed in the fourth octet? I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance. Best Regards, Hunt Lee Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed off an address. That's a nice way of putting it eh? Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do the trick because it allows 48 and 49 through. Regards, Gaz Shengtao wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 will allow 40-47, and you need another statement Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0 to allow 48 to get through. Am I worng? Godswill HO wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Try the following: IP access-list standard allowed Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while the last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole range without affecting other addresses with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should I do? Any help is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Hunt Lee IP Solution Analyst Cable Wireless _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31037t=31001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes i tried the groupstudy site and when all i got [7:31036]
When i said i tried everything , i tried everything, the unsubscribe command at the sites and all other avenues and got back undeliverable mail thank you, joseph Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31036t=31036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T-1 controller card on a 2620 router?? [7:30987]
What's the part number? If you have a CCO login you can use the following to get your answer: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello, Is it possible to plug in a 2-port T-1 controller card on a 2620 router and configure the controller commands on it like #controller t1 1/0 #linecode etc. etc. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31038t=30987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
automatic retrieval and ENCRYPTION of router configs [7:31039]
Hello all , im looking for a friendly point in the right direction here . I am looking for a kind of tftp program that will not only automatically retrieve and store configs from remote routers but will also encrypt or password protect them where they are stored. is there such a thing? thanks for any replies. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31039t=31039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Equipments [7:31040]
Hi Guys, Want to set up a home lab. I have listed some stuff that is should have. 3x2501 routers; 1x2522 or 2523; 3x2502/2504 routers A Cat5K switch or a 2900 (non XL); 1 TokenRing One ISDN Simulator; Token Ring Mau x 2; Token Ring NIC/Cables x 2; Probably two Cisco 2602 or maybe 4700/4500/3620 Token Ring 3920 Will adding an Intel Intelligent Server Adaptor be helpful ? Anything that i missed out. Pls send me your feedback, so that i can complete the set. Any ideas from where i can buy this cheap? Awaiting your feedback, Thanks, Prabhat __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31040t=31040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: automatic retrieval and ENCRYPTION of router configs [7:31041]
Eric, I personally haven't heard of an off the shelf application that could do this but it could be easily written. Someone (me ;-) could write this in about an hour. First I would configure ssh on the router. Then I would write a script in Expect* to connect to the router with ssh. Have the script grab the config from the router. It then encrypts the config and stores it on the server. Add a nice little user interface using HTML/PHP and you're done. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Expect is a very useful scripting language for automation network task. Check it out at http://expect.nist.gov/ 2387 wrote: Hello all , im looking for a friendly point in the right direction here . I am looking for a kind of tftp program that will not only automatically retrieve and store configs from remote routers but will also encrypt or password protect them where they are stored. is there such a thing? thanks for any replies. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31041t=31041 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4500 flash upgrade problem [7:31042]
Hi all, I tried to install two new 8MB flash to my 4500 router. When the router booted up, observed following error message : % Invalid chip id 0x detected in System flash. Setting System flash access to READ-ONLY. Other than that the router was able to boot to 'router (boot) ' prompt. I entered 'copy tftp flash' command, got following message: Address or name of remote host [192.168.0.10]? Name of file to copy? c4500-a3js56i-mz_121-9.bin Copy c4500-a3js56i-mz_121-9.bin from 192.168.0.10? [confirm] Checking for file 'c4500-a3js56i-mz_121-9.bin' on 192.168.0.10... [OK] dev_iopen: System flash not writable. - Was this because of wrong type of flash ? - How can I change the flash to 'Writable' ? Thanks in advance for any feedback. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31042t=31042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: automatic retrieval and ENCRYPTION of router configs [7:31043]
I write a shell script that will automatically backup the router configuration every day at 12am midnight everyday. Furthermore, I use SNMP version 3 so that traffic between the SNMP management station (Linux box running ucd-SNMP) and the routers is encrypted. Both SNMP v1 and v2 do not encrypt data. You need to run IOS version 12.1.5 or higher (not sure about this one) in order for SNMP version 3 to work... - Original Message - From: 2387 To: Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 8:33 PM Subject: automatic retrieval and ENCRYPTION of router configs [7:31039] Hello all , im looking for a friendly point in the right direction here . I am looking for a kind of tftp program that will not only automatically retrieve and store configs from remote routers but will also encrypt or password protect them where they are stored. is there such a thing? thanks for any replies. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31043t=31043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what Cisco IOS versión is based the last [7:30969]
Doesn't matter... IOS is never based on the exam... only the other way round, and in this case, it still doesn't matter there is no change as far as CCNA is concern... Anibal Pita wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Guys Somebody can tell me what Cisco IOS versisn is based the last release of CCNA exam ? Thank you in advance Anibal P. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31044t=30969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab Equipments [7:31040]
You might want to substitute two 2513s for two of the 2501s. Consider a 2509 or 2511 for a terminal server. 2503s for ISDN. -Original Message- From: Prabhat Sen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab Equipments [7:31040] Hi Guys, Want to set up a home lab. I have listed some stuff that is should have. 3x2501 routers; 1x2522 or 2523; 3x2502/2504 routers A Cat5K switch or a 2900 (non XL); 1 TokenRing One ISDN Simulator; Token Ring Mau x 2; Token Ring NIC/Cables x 2; Probably two Cisco 2602 or maybe 4700/4500/3620 Token Ring 3920 Will adding an Intel Intelligent Server Adaptor be helpful ? Anything that i missed out. Pls send me your feedback, so that i can complete the set. Any ideas from where i can buy this cheap? Awaiting your feedback, Thanks, Prabhat __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31046t=31040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doyle, RIP and Secondary Interfaces [7:31047]
On pages 214- 215 of Routing TCP/IP by Doyle mention that when using secondary interfaces with RIP v1 the routing process sees secondary interfaces as separate data links. Thus in a routing table there will be equal-cost routes for the next hop addresses associated with both the primary and secondary addresses. I am not able to reproduce this, in my case the next hop address is always the one associated with the primary IP address. Was this behavior changed some how in later versions of IOS. I am using ver 12.2(1). Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31047t=31047 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have tried everything to get off this list, please [7:31048]
I think this is your problem ^^^ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... nothing else has worked Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31048t=31048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab Equipments - Any one selling ? [7:31040]
Thanks for all the feedbacks: Any one selling these equipments for a home lab . Pls send me mail directly. My email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any reliable websites from where hese are aviabale? List of Equipments: 2x2501 routers; 1x2522 or 2523; 2x2503 or 2504 routers; 1 x 2513 or 2514 A Cat5K switch or a 2900 (non XL); One ISDN Simulator; Token Ring Mau x 2; 1 x 2509 or CS 516 1 x Token Ring 3920 Thanks, Prabhat __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31049t=31040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab Equipments - Any one selling ? [7:31040]
Prabhat, Check out Brad Ellis at www.optsys.net . He can hook you up with everything you need. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Prabhat Sen wrote in message news:... Thanks for all the feedbacks: Any one selling these equipments for a home lab . Pls send me mail directly. My email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any reliable websites from where hese are aviabale? List of Equipments: 2x2501 routers; 1x2522 or 2523; 2x2503 or 2504 routers; 1 x 2513 or 2514 A Cat5K switch or a 2900 (non XL); One ISDN Simulator; Token Ring Mau x 2; 1 x 2509 or CS 516 1 x Token Ring 3920 Thanks, Prabhat __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31050t=31040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CISCO CATALYST 3900 NEEEDED [7:31051]
I need two Catalyst 3900 for myself and a buddy to study CCIE-LAB... Can you give me two for 2800$ total ? We want to save shipping cost. WE WILL PAY BY CREDIT CARD Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31051t=31051 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
