RE: Please stop sending me dumps [7:48064]
It's a test Morgan :) Whoever it is ... Is trying to lure you to the dark side. Be strong. ;) Sorry couldn't resist -Original Message- From: Morgan Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 July 2002 02:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please stop sending me dumps [7:48064] I would like everyone who is trying to send me so called dumps on this studygroup to stop doing so right now! I thank you for your kind thoughts, but id rather make the exam on my own thank you so much. I don't need them so buzz off! Morgan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48079&t=48064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077]
depends on the device type that you are connecting to, but this works for cisco routers: modem Host terminal-type vt100 transport input all stopbits 1 Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michalis Palis Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077] Hello all I am trying to configure a Cisco 2511 router as a terminal server in order to connect to vi the tty ports to the console ports of my core routers. I followed all the steps that are described on Cisco WEb side but whenever i do reverse telnet, I get the message connection refused by remote host. Any suggestion or a sample working config will be appreciated __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48080&t=48077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
Hi Group, Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at the customer premises. In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's existing network equipment. The client continually insisted that they are having is individual T1's. Further, we couldn't get an opportunity to inspect the site and even the client couldn't reveal the type of current routers used. bit tuff job. I had to forward some of the emails received from you'all to the client to convince them thay should be having T3's. Unfortuately the network was maintained by some third party and client was not too sure. However after some time, client confirmed that they are having T3'sinstead of T1's, with some apologies.. In fact, this is first time I came across a requirement of 188 T1's to connect. That's why I check with the group to see whether somebody has done it before..:)) So thanks again roberts, craig, brian, chuck, howard, peter, mike, phillip and nrf for the valuable input you have given. Take care. - (on postoffice) The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire confidentiality clause. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48081&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA Exam [7:47923]
i think this site is good one http://www.net130.com but please do not tell anybody cause the cbts over there is free lol -Original Message- From: Joupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA Exam [7:47923] Hi all Im going to sit for CCNA soon , would you give me the address of some usefull sites Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48082&t=47923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What a mess...... [7:48005]
I think the equivalent switch gonna be 2950 , this is my opinion thanks ismail al-shelh -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What a mess.. [7:48005] Team, Last month I bought for my lab a 5500 switch for my lab and now Cisco changed the requirement for a 3550.. My question is what will be an equivalent to the 3550, will I be use any 29XX, I don't want to spent more money, Does it make any sense to keep the 5500 No money on my packet and many things to do and to buy. J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48083&t=48005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
COngrat Bravo man HATO >From: "Kim Graham" >Reply-To: "Kim Graham" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] >Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:24:41 GMT > >It took me 5 months to complete my CCNP. At the time I was working the >grave shift (11:30 - 7:30) doing mainly maintenances and alerts. In >otherwords no study time at night, we were fairly busy, though the job gave >me no end to hands on experience. > >Kim > > > > > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Date: 2002/07/04 Thu AM 02:43:15 EDT > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] > > > > Congratulations Dan > > > > I felt the same very similar about the CIT ... But then I thought maybe >I > > just didn't pay attention in the first place :) > > > > A question I'd like to throw out if you don't mind entertaining me is >this > > :)How many of you's on this list has achieved CCNP/IP/DP or CCIE written >in > > the last four months and how long did it take you to achieve the >complete > > cert or the written. > > > > It took me about three months to get this. Of course I was sitting >around > > for the last year doing nothing at all. I had all these books on the >shelf > > including a lot of CCIE level books and I was intimidated by them. >Didn't > > have the courage to open one. Now I feel I can conquer the world ... >When >it > > comes to study / learning / playing with the stuff > > > > Manish > > CCNP (for three weeks!) ;) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 03 July 2002 21:02 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] > > > > > > Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move. > > Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY > > nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed > > because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions. I read MANY >of > > the questions repeatedly without ever finding out what they meant. > > > > Dan _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48088&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830]
The best preparation for this exam is the Cisco training material for Implementing Cisco MPLS (v1.0)...it was 3 volumes and nothing in the exam was outside the material. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group, > > Today I took the MPLS exam and I flunked.I used the book MPLS and VPN > architecture(First edition) by Ivan Pepelnjak.From my experience this book > is not sufficient to prepare for the exam.About the exam it is not too > toughf, if proper material would have been there. > The passing mark is also too high,it is 867.I scored 798.. > If any knows some good links for preparing for the exam.Pls suggest. > > Kind Regards /Thangavel > > 186K > Reading,Brkshire > Direct No -0118 9064259 > Mobile No -07796292416 > Post code: RG16LH > www.186k.co.uk > > -- > The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, > but in rising every time we fall ." > -- Nelson Mandela > > > > > > ** > This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the > addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential > or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or > the person responsible for delivering the message to the named > addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The > contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies > taken. > 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England > & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street > London SW1Y 4UR > ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48089&t=47830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pix Training course [7:48090]
Hi Anthony et al, I hope you found the course informative and useful as an introduction to = the Pix firewall. If you need a more comprehensive view of the Pix = firewall, I believe there are 3 day courses offered by some of the = larger training houses in Dublin. I've attached a copy of the Powerpoint presentation of the Pix training = course, I'm hoping to upgrade the material soon (when time permits) to = include failover and a bit on VPN's, when I get this done I will e-mail = the updated Powerpoint presentation to yourselves. The Cisco web site is an invaluable tool for configuration documents = www.cisco.com, in addition the following website has a mailing list that = I also find very useful www.groupstudy.com =20 If you have any queries or support related questions don't hesitate to = e-mail us at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kind Regards, Ciaron Gogarty __ Ciaron Gogarty CCNP CSS-1 CCSE MCSE (NT & W2K) CCA Consultant LAN Communications Ltd Parkway House, Lower Ballymount Road Dublin 12 Ireland web:www.lancomms.ie e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ph: +353 1 409 3000 fax:+353 1 409 3001 ___ [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/vnd] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48090&t=48090 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOIP [7:48091]
Team, I am currently trying to implement VOIP for the first time using Cisco routers. Can you please give me a URL or any resource where i can read about this step by step or go through a simulation. THIS IS URGENT, I APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSE. Cisco Die-Hard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48091&t=48091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What to look for... [7:48092]
On my latest CCNA tryout (yes, i funked but it shall NOT happen again! :-(), I remember something about DSAP. So obviosly I went hope catching up on it, so that I would know the answers to DSAP related problems. What im having a relly hard time figuring out here, reading the CNAP curriculum, Wendel Odom`s and Wave books, is wether DSAP is 802.2 or 802.3?? In the Odom book it says, I quote; when IEEE created 802.2, they saw the need for e protocol type field. They called it DSAP, and anyone could. Then, on the next page it reads; 802.2 SAP and SNAP type fields; 802.3EO DSAP EO SSAP CTL IPX DATA 802.3 802.3AA DSAP AA SSAP 03 CTL OUI 0800 Type IP DATA 802.3 Then nothing? So, what im wondering is When being asked on the exam wether DSAP uses 802.2 or 802.3 I havent got the idea what to answer?? Cause as far as I know, it uses both! Clearly it does so? I just couldnt choose one out of the other just like that could i? Well I guess I could, but I have no idea of what to look for (being of interrest in a question like this anyways?) When Cisco asks me quest like this, im wondering Are Cisco interrested in finding out if I know that IEEE saw the need for a protocol type field ie created it, or more in depth like what kind of fields it uses? It cant be the last one here, cause then they wouldnt form the question like they did, so? -Please help me out on this one techgods- -Morgan (Taking one day at a time) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48092&t=48092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
Wow, that makes be feel a little better, although I am still baffled buy the sheer number T-3's required for that. I'm curious though what type of business is this? Can you at least throw us a bone... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] Hi Group, Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at the customer premises. In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's existing network equipment. The client continually insisted that they are having is individual T1's. Further, we couldn't get an opportunity to inspect the site and even the client couldn't reveal the type of current routers used. bit tuff job. I had to forward some of the emails received from you'all to the client to convince them thay should be having T3's. Unfortuately the network was maintained by some third party and client was not too sure. However after some time, client confirmed that they are having T3'sinstead of T1's, with some apologies.. In fact, this is first time I came across a requirement of 188 T1's to connect. That's why I check with the group to see whether somebody has done it before..:)) So thanks again roberts, craig, brian, chuck, howard, peter, mike, phillip and nrf for the valuable input you have given. Take care. - (on postoffice) The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire confidentiality clause. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48093&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast - Cisco and Bay [7:48094]
Hi all, Is there a way to contain Multicast traffic to certain access points. I have a Cisco 4006 core with old Baystack 450 hubs/switches on the outside. Currently the multicast server is connected and users start experiencing slight disconnects on mapped drives etc.. The multicast traffic is staying on this LAN only and NOT going near a router. Can I restrict which ports get multicast and which not?? Thanks in advance Andrew Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48094&t=48094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CISSP [7:48095]
If there are any CISSP certified professionals out there, I would like to talk to you one on one about the certification. I am very interested in obtaining this cert in the future (I want to go into security). I am going to be a freshman in College in the fall incase anyone was wondering why I said I wanted to go into security. So please if anyone has this certification e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jarred Nicholls CCNA, CCNP Routing Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48095&t=48095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast - Cisco and Bay [7:48094]
CGMP or ACL's. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Is there a way to contain Multicast traffic to certain access points. I have > a Cisco 4006 core with old Baystack 450 hubs/switches on the outside. > Currently the multicast server is connected and users start experiencing > slight disconnects on mapped drives etc.. > The multicast traffic is staying on this LAN only and NOT going near a > router. Can I restrict which ports get multicast and which not?? > > Thanks in advance > > Andrew Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48096&t=48094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
sorry whole project is on NDA signed. that's why so many restrictions.. least i can say is its on financial sector. "Roberts, Larry" wrote: > Wow, that makes be feel a little better, although I am still baffled buy the > sheer number T-3's required for that. I'm curious though what type of > business is this? Can you at least throw us a bone... > Thanks > > Larry > > > -Original Message- > From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] > > Hi Group, > > Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions > made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at > the customer premises. > > In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's existing network > equipment. The client continually insisted that they are having is > individual T1's. Further, we couldn't get an opportunity to inspect the site > and even the client couldn't reveal the type of current routers used. > bit tuff job. > > I had to forward some of the emails received from you'all to the client to > convince them thay should be having T3's. Unfortuately the network was > maintained by some third party and client was not too sure. However after > some time, client confirmed that they are having T3'sinstead of > T1's, with some apologies.. > > In fact, this is first time I came across a requirement of 188 T1's to > connect. That's why I check with the group to see whether somebody has done > it before..:)) > > So thanks again roberts, craig, brian, chuck, howard, peter, mike, phillip > and nrf for the valuable input you have given. > > Take care. > - (on postoffice) > > The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > confidentiality clause. > > - - (on postoffice) The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire confidentiality clause. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48097&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What to look for... [7:48092]
To check the validity of your training manuals, cross reference the CCO. Information here is less likely (IMHO) to contradict. Cisco says: Upper-layer processes use IEEE 802.2 services through service access points (SAPs). The IEEE 802.2 header begins with a destination service access point (DSAP) field, which identifies the receiving upper-layer process. In other words, after the receiving node's IEEE 802.2 implementation completes its processing, the upper-layer process identified in the DSAP field receives the remaining data. Following the DSAP address is the source service access point (SSAP) address, which identifies the sending upper-layer process. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/sdlcetc.htm http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/90/22.html All the best Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan Hansen Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What to look for... [7:48092] On my latest CCNA tryout (yes, i funked but it shall NOT happen again! :-(), I remember something about DSAP. So obviosly I went hope catching up on it, so that I would know the answers to DSAP related problems. What im having a relly hard time figuring out here, reading the CNAP curriculum, Wendel Odom`s and Wave books, is wether DSAP is 802.2 or 802.3?? In the Odom book it says, I quote; when IEEE created 802.2, they saw the need for e protocol type field. They called it DSAP, and anyone could. Then, on the next page it reads; 802.2 SAP and SNAP type fields; 802.3EO DSAP EO SSAP CTL IPX DATA 802.3 802.3AA DSAP AA SSAP 03 CTL OUI 0800 Type IP DATA 802.3 Then nothing? So, what im wondering is When being asked on the exam wether DSAP uses 802.2 or 802.3 I havent got the idea what to answer?? Cause as far as I know, it uses both! Clearly it does so? I just couldnt choose one out of the other just like that could i? Well I guess I could, but I have no idea of what to look for (being of interrest in a question like this anyways?) When Cisco asks me quest like this, im wondering Are Cisco interrested in finding out if I know that IEEE saw the need for a protocol type field ie created it, or more in depth like what kind of fields it uses? It cant be the last one here, cause then they wouldnt form the question like they did, so? -Please help me out on this one techgods- -Morgan (Taking one day at a time) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48098&t=48092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS numbers makes the difference right? [7:48099]
Guys, im going completely mental over here! Im afraid my brain is going to go BOOM in a second! Heres the thing; Say you have 2 routers, with their respective routing tables right. Router-A have these networks in its routing tabel: 192.168.2.0 192.168.3.0 192.168.4.0 And Rouer-B has these: 192.168.3.0 192.168.8.0 192.168.5.0 Now, what makes me crazy here is that I know that by looking at this, I can tell that Router-A and Router-B have directly connected networks, and therefore in Router-Bs routing tabel all of Router-As networks + Router-Bs networks will show. But! Now this is a BIG BUT! If, say Router-A has the as number 100 (That is router igrp 100), and Router-B has the as number 101 (router igrp 101). Then they are NOT directly connected and therefor will not share routing table's right??? Or?? I mean, the as numbers decide this if im not entirelly wrong (which I most def could be) Please, like ive said im going totally bananas over this and need some help. If in fact Router-Bs routing table will show both Router-As and its own networks, then. Is this because of the use of IGRP? Cause im reading the Wendel Odom book here, and it says, I quote; "The following list summarizes the behavior of a router that uses the RIP-1 or IGRP distance vector routing protocols: -Routers add DIRECTLY CONNECTED subnets to their routing tables. Routers do not need to run a routing protocol to learn connected routes, but conneced subnets routes are advertised to neighboring routers by the routing protocol". Ok, this I know. But, im confused about the as numbers here (100 vs 101) Because of this I would figure that Yes, Router-Bs routing table would normally show us both Routers networks (being directly connected and all) BUT, not when the as numbers are different. Guys, am I totally missing the point here? Please help me figure this one out! Im loosing it :-( Morgan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48099&t=48099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPSec with IP Unnumbered Interface [7:48100]
Does anyone know how to configure IPsec Tunnel to terminate at an IP Address that is confiugred with ip unnumbered command? Serial 0/0 is using ip unnumbred f0/0 on 2621 router. IPSec doesn't seem to like the ip unnumbered interface or the loopback as its termination point I am trying not to reconfiugre the entire IP scheme for a large organization. If there is a way to make it work with ip unnumberd on serial interface, it could save me a lot of time and aggrevation. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48100&t=48100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077]
Thanks for your info. After a few tests tha I made, i discoverd that after I disconnect the sessions from the termserver which is a ciscos2511, the tty line of the session returns to the idle state (issuing who command i see the tty line in idle state). In order to manage the reverse telnet session i have to manually clear the tty line of the session using the clear line command. But on some routers the TTY becomes idle again 2 seconds after issuing command clear line . This does not allow me to do reverse telnet. Now I had to try a few times to clear the tty line using the clear command in order to be able to do reverse telnet. I think that their maybe some traffic on the line which keeps the line to the idle state but i did not manage to find out what it is. Any suggestions? --- Alex Lee wrote: > This has been covered in the newsgroup and can be > located in the archives. > > You got 'connective refuse by remote host' messeage > is because you are > trying to telnet into host(s) which have already a > stance of reverse telnet > session running. > > This is what you'll see if you do a 'show line'. > The report below shows that serial port 1 & 2 are > alreay connected to r1 and > r2 respectively. If I do another reverse telent to > r1 and r2 I'll get > 'refuse connection' message. > > + > term_server#sh line >Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI > Uses Noise Overruns > Int > *0 CTY -- --- > 2 0 > 0 - > *1 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 5 > 0 - > *2 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 4 > 0 - > 3 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 4 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 5 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 6 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 7 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 8 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 9 AUX 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 10 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 11 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 12 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 13 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 14 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > ++ > > Try to do a couple of 'disconnect' to terminate all > existing reverse telnet > sessions and you should be able to do new reverse > telnet :- > > ++ > term_server#disconnect > Closing connection to r2 [confirm] > term_server#disconnect > Closing connection to r1 [confirm] > > term_server#sh line >Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI > Uses Noise Overruns > Int > *0 CTY -- --- > 2 0 > 0 - > 1 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 5 > 0 - > 2 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 4 > 0 - > 3 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 4 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 5 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 6 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 7 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 8 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 9 AUX 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 10 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 11 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 12 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 13 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 14 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > > +++ > > Here is my AS2509rj config: > > +++ > term_server# sh config > Using 858 out of 32762 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > no service single-slot-reload-enable > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname term_server > ! > logging rate-limit console 10 except errors > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip finger > ip tcp synwait-time 5 > ip host r1 2001 1.1.1.1 > ip host pix8 2008 1.1.1.1 > ip host sw7 2007 1.1.1.1 > ip host sw6 2006 1.1.1.1 > ip host r5 2005
Re: Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077]
Thanks for your info. After a few tests tha I made, i discoverd that after I disconnect the sessions from the termserver which is a ciscos2511, the tty line of the session returns to the idle state (issuing who command i see the tty line in idle state). In order to manage the reverse telnet session i have to manually clear the tty line of the session using the clear line command. But on some routers the TTY becomes idle again 2 seconds after issuing command clear line . This does not allow me to do reverse telnet. Now I had to try a few times to clear the tty line using the clear command in order to be able to do reverse telnet. I think that their maybe some traffic on the line which keeps the line to the idle state but i did not manage to find out what it is. Any suggestions? --- Alex Lee wrote: > This has been covered in the newsgroup and can be > located in the archives. > > You got 'connective refuse by remote host' messeage > is because you are > trying to telnet into host(s) which have already a > stance of reverse telnet > session running. > > This is what you'll see if you do a 'show line'. > The report below shows that serial port 1 & 2 are > alreay connected to r1 and > r2 respectively. If I do another reverse telent to > r1 and r2 I'll get > 'refuse connection' message. > > + > term_server#sh line >Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI > Uses Noise Overruns > Int > *0 CTY -- --- > 2 0 > 0 - > *1 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 5 > 0 - > *2 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 4 > 0 - > 3 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 4 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 5 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 6 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 7 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 8 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 9 AUX 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 10 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 11 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 12 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 13 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 14 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > ++ > > Try to do a couple of 'disconnect' to terminate all > existing reverse telnet > sessions and you should be able to do new reverse > telnet :- > > ++ > term_server#disconnect > Closing connection to r2 [confirm] > term_server#disconnect > Closing connection to r1 [confirm] > > term_server#sh line >Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI > Uses Noise Overruns > Int > *0 CTY -- --- > 2 0 > 0 - > 1 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 5 > 0 - > 2 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 4 > 0 - > 3 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 4 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 5 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 6 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 7 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 8 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 9 AUX 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 10 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 11 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 12 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 13 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 14 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > > +++ > > Here is my AS2509rj config: > > +++ > term_server# sh config > Using 858 out of 32762 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > no service single-slot-reload-enable > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname term_server > ! > logging rate-limit console 10 except errors > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip finger > ip tcp synwait-time 5 > ip host r1 2001 1.1.1.1 > ip host pix8 2008 1.1.1.1 > ip host sw7 2007 1.1.1.1 > ip host sw6 2006 1.1.1.1 > ip host r5 2005
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
Sometimes you have to ask yourself (unfortunately, your top management rarely does) if a certain client's business is worth it. I don't necessarily mean the hassle factor in implementing, but if they are not forthcoming on information, and are too secretive, you may be doomed to have a dissatisfied customer. Perhaps this story, presumably from a different industry, might help you with them. In the early 1960's, the CIA was building its headquarters, under the general management of the government-wide construction management agency. Obviously, at some stage of the construction, the heating and air conditioning had to be designed, and the subcontractor asked the necessary question, "how many people will be in the building ( to know how much body heat would load the air conditioners)? CIA: "We can't tell you." Contractor: *sigh* Installed on best estimate. Heating OK, A/C didn't work. CIA: "We won't pay you until you fix it." Contractor: "We'll put thermostats in every office so we can fine tune." That made it worse, because people constantly adjusted them and the system couldn't stabilize. The contractor then put all the thermostats into locked boxes, had a technician adjust them and lock them, and things worked briefly. Unfortunately, no one had thought of certain customer skills. There is, in CIA Junior Officer Training, a course called "Locks and Flaps." The significance of this was that if an office didn't have an occupant who knew how to pick locks, someone just down the hall did. Every thermostat went crazy. At this point, the contractor sued. After explaining why they couldn't properly size the system because the CIA wouldn't tell them the load, the judged asked the CIA "is this true?" When he heard the sheepish admission "yes," he slammed down the gavel and told the CIA "pay them. Case closed." Anyway, I can believe a financial industry client does have this much bandwidth, for reasons of experience. The same principle holds as if they were T1s, however: get the carrier/telco to multiplex them into higher-speed aggregates that you can feed to a router, multiplexer, or switch. Even if they have 188 DS-3's, this still should groom into some number of OC-48's or OC-192's. (slight plug) I've discussed this at length in my "WAN Survival Guide" (Wiley). One major consideration will be the line utilization. Sometimes, clients such as this want the low delay of very high speed lines, but don't actually put that much data on them. In those cases, you can get away with a high-speed router interface but not overload it with forwarding. Measurements are essential before you do this. You will also want to have direct engineering access to the carrier(s) they use, to discuss grooming and redundancy strategy, and how the carriers will support physical diversity. Another thing that worries me is that you describe this as a hub and spoke. With this much data, don't they have at least one hot standby location? If they, for example, don't have at least two geographically dispersed sites on a SONET ring or a more modern equivalent, they are insane...although you may already have concluded that. Even at the individual sites, there should be physically diverse local loops. Given the availability of metro Ethernet and 10G Ethernet, this isn't an overwhelmingly difficult thing to do, or you might just do drop-and-repeat WDM. The data centers, of course, would have to be cross-connected to stay synchronized; that's why I say drop-and-repeat rather than add-and-drop. >sorry >whole project is on NDA signed. >that's why so many restrictions.. >least i can say is its on financial sector. > > >"Roberts, Larry" wrote: > >> Wow, that makes be feel a little better, although I am still baffled buy >the >> sheer number T-3's required for that. I'm curious though what type of >> business is this? Can you at least throw us a bone... >> Thanks >> >> Larry >> >> >> -Original Message- > > From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:12 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] > > >> Hi Group, >> >> Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions >> made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at >> the customer premises. >> >> In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's existing network >> equipment. The client continually insisted that they are having is >> individual T1's. Further, we couldn't get an opportunity to inspect the >site >> and even the client couldn't reveal the type of current routers used. >> bit tuff job. >> >> I had to forward some of the emails received from you'all to the client to >> convince them thay should be having T3's. Unfortuately the network was >> maintained by some third party and client was not too sure. However after >> some ti
Re: unity port question [7:48073]
Which version of Unity are you talking about? 2.4.6? That's what Im using right now. You only have 2 ports available for use on Unity due to the demo license. If you purchase more licenses, then you can get more ports. So, in other words, you can not activate the other 8 ports using the demo license. :) Also, make sure you install the correct TSP version for the version of Unity you are running (just made that whoops and got a million or so service hangs) I'm about to drop kick my call mangler and unity server. These buggers are soo darn picky, and you can do some lovely things which you can't un-do very easily. Too bad they just dont have an IOS image or something like that you can load on a box and be done with it. Winblows and service packs are driving me to drink. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net ""supernet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I downloaded unity server from Cisco. I don't have a key so I installed > as demo. When tried to integrate with call manager, I created 10 ports > on call manager and TSP. But when I checked "unity status monitoring", > it said I used 2 ports and had 8 available. How do I activate those 8 > ports? > > Thanks. > Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48076&t=48073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help [7:48085]
Pradhu, you've got : 1.. a 2500 router with a 256kbps link to the internet 2.. 2 switches from the 1900 series. Each switch has 12 ports 3.. 45 users divided in 2 groups. One group with 25 users. Another group with 20 users. Each group needs 128 kbps of bandwidth. Each group needs access to the internet. 4.. 16 public addresses. 5.. one ethernet segment You need: 1.. to differentiate you traffic. >From that, some question are raised. 1.. You said that you have 45 users, but you have only 2 switches with 12 ports each for a total of 24 ports. On what are connected the rest of the users. Those 21. 2.. How do you assign the addresses on the workstation. Dhcp server or you assign them statically. 3.. What is the range of addresses on the ethernet segment 4.. Are you using PAT. Port address translation 5.. Do you want to give the possibility to access the internet to 45 simultaneous users. 6.. if you give the first group of 25 users 128 kbps and 128 kbps to the second group of users 128 kbps. It means that on average both groups have roughly the same amount of bandwidth per users. The question is then, what's the point to do that. If you had 2 groups with VERY distinct needs i would understand. But the way you present the problem both groups have more or less the same needs. Consequently, i do not see any needs for differentiating the traffic. Please Pradhu, clarify the 6 points above. So we can go a little bit further. Thanks, Daniel Thiffeault. ""Prabhu K."" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear all, > >One of our customer is having a router of 2500 series with 2 serial > port & 1 ethernet port and the IOS is 11.3 and router memory is 8 Mb and > a flash memory of 8Mb Presently he is having a link of 128Kbps landing on > one of the serial port. Now, he wants to have two separate link of > 128Kbps,totally customer want's dedicated to two different purpose( One > for browsing i.e general users 25 nodes and one link for restricted group > of users -- 20 nodes this traffic also should routed on the same > Internet). > > Now the problem is we can't give two dedicated 128kbps, instead of that > we can give aggregate of 256kbps, in that case how to dedicated the set > of user's here on single WAN link's and we have given 16 IP add to this > customer. He is having a two number of 1900 series switch with 12 port. > Now the problem is how I do routing for only those user setting in same > LAN and how I make sure that they get 128kbps bandwidth. > > Pls. let me know what is the best possible way to implement this. > > Please start posting your suggestion and make this great group alive :-) > > With best regards & hope to hear more on the above issue, > > Prabu > India Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48104&t=48085 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]
I'm interested in meeting. Does Monday evening work for those that are attending? On a side note: Anyone else driving down from Atlanta? Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 20:03:36 GMT >From: "Paul Borghese" >Subject: Re: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] > >Sure. I will be there. Two years ago we had a GroupStudy dinner in >Orlando. Anyone else interested? > >Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48105&t=47846 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AS numbers makes the difference right? [7:48099]
Morgan Routers enter into their routing table routes to 'directly connected' networks. In this case I will assume that, 192.168.3.0 is a directly Connected Network for both RTA and RTB. This would be designated by C in the routing Table. Even though you may be running IGRP on both routers, you are running them with different processes or AS numbers. IGRP processes with different AS's do not share information unless specifically configured to do so with the redistribute command. If however RTA was running EIGRP with Process 100 and RTB was running IGRP with Process 100, then the routers would share information. This is the only time you don't have to do 'work' to make two different routing protocols talk to each other. This of course only occurs when the Process numbers are the same for EIGRP and IGRP. If the AS numbers were different, then you once again have to revert to Redistribute commands to make the routers learn each others' routes. Looking at your example, the only 'common' network between RTA and RTB is 192.168.3.0, the rest are unique hence RTA not showing .8 and .5 networks and RTB not showing .2 and .5 networks Hope this clears this up. Manish -Original Message- From: Morgan Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 July 2002 15:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AS numbers makes the difference right? [7:48099] Guys, im going completely mental over here! Im afraid my brain is going to go BOOM in a second! Heres the thing; Say you have 2 routers, with their respective routing tables right. Router-A have these networks in its routing tabel: 192.168.2.0 192.168.3.0 192.168.4.0 And Rouer-B has these: 192.168.3.0 192.168.8.0 192.168.5.0 Now, what makes me crazy here is that I know that by looking at this, I can tell that Router-A and Router-B have directly connected networks, and therefore in Router-Bs routing tabel all of Router-As networks + Router-Bs networks will show. But! Now this is a BIG BUT! If, say Router-A has the as number 100 (That is router igrp 100), and Router-B has the as number 101 (router igrp 101). Then they are NOT directly connected and therefor will not share routing table's right??? Or?? I mean, the as numbers decide this if im not entirelly wrong (which I most def could be) Please, like ive said im going totally bananas over this and need some help. If in fact Router-Bs routing table will show both Router-As and its own networks, then. Is this because of the use of IGRP? Cause im reading the Wendel Odom book here, and it says, I quote; "The following list summarizes the behavior of a router that uses the RIP-1 or IGRP distance vector routing protocols: -Routers add DIRECTLY CONNECTED subnets to their routing tables. Routers do not need to run a routing protocol to learn connected routes, but conneced subnets routes are advertised to neighboring routers by the routing protocol". Ok, this I know. But, im confused about the as numbers here (100 vs 101) Because of this I would figure that Yes, Router-Bs routing table would normally show us both Routers networks (being directly connected and all) BUT, not when the as numbers are different. Guys, am I totally missing the point here? Please help me figure this one out! Im loosing it :-( Morgan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48106&t=48099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for VPN config with 3DES [7:48107]
Can someone tell where I can get a good doc on Cisco Router to Avaya VPNet Site-to-Site VPN with 3DES? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48107&t=48107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077]
Try configuring "no exec" for your lines config. line 1 8 no exec -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michalis Palis Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 6:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077] Thanks for your info. After a few tests tha I made, i discoverd that after I disconnect the sessions from the termserver which is a ciscos2511, the tty line of the session returns to the idle state (issuing who command i see the tty line in idle state). In order to manage the reverse telnet session i have to manually clear the tty line of the session using the clear line command. But on some routers the TTY becomes idle again 2 seconds after issuing command clear line . This does not allow me to do reverse telnet. Now I had to try a few times to clear the tty line using the clear command in order to be able to do reverse telnet. I think that their maybe some traffic on the line which keeps the line to the idle state but i did not manage to find out what it is. Any suggestions? --- Alex Lee wrote: > This has been covered in the newsgroup and can be > located in the archives. > > You got 'connective refuse by remote host' messeage > is because you are > trying to telnet into host(s) which have already a > stance of reverse telnet > session running. > > This is what you'll see if you do a 'show line'. > The report below shows that serial port 1 & 2 are > alreay connected to r1 and > r2 respectively. If I do another reverse telent to > r1 and r2 I'll get > 'refuse connection' message. > > + > term_server#sh line >Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI > Uses Noise Overruns > Int > *0 CTY -- --- > 2 0 > 0 - > *1 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 5 > 0 - > *2 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 4 > 0 - > 3 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 4 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 5 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 6 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 7 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 8 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 9 AUX 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 10 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 11 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 12 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 13 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 14 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > ++ > > Try to do a couple of 'disconnect' to terminate all > existing reverse telnet > sessions and you should be able to do new reverse > telnet :- > > ++ > term_server#disconnect > Closing connection to r2 [confirm] > term_server#disconnect > Closing connection to r1 [confirm] > > term_server#sh line >Tty Typ Tx/RxA Modem Roty AccO AccI > Uses Noise Overruns > Int > *0 CTY -- --- > 2 0 > 0 - > 1 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 5 > 0 - > 2 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 1 4 > 0 - > 3 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 4 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 5 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 6 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 7 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 8 TTY 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 9 AUX 9600/9600 -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 10 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 11 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 12 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 13 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > 14 VTY -- --- > 0 0 > 0 - > > +++ > > Here is my AS2509rj config: > > +++ > term_server# sh config > Using 858 out of 32762 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > no service single-slot-reload-enable > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname term_server > ! > logging rate-limit console 10 except errors > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip finger > ip tcp synwait-ti
Re: RIP V1&V2 [7:48072]
The real issue here is the particular vendor's implementation of RIP v1... If I Was to implement RIP v1 , I would certainly allow it to accept routes from RIP v 2 speakers, this is for robustness and to guard against misconfiguration bringing the entire network down. N --- Chuck wrote: > without having had the chance to verify this for myself, I can offer > that > someone who occasionally lurks on this list once told me about a good > RIP > lab he designed, in which this issue is covered. His purpose in > designing > this particular lab was to demonstrate exactly what you are > reporting, and > to show how you can get screwed as a result. > > I've been meaning to look at this for some time now. Don't know if > I'll have > a chance in the near future, but if I do, I will certainly report the > result. > > Chuck > > > > ""Leo Song"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, there. > > > > In case a RIP v1 speaking router (Send v1 and Receive v1 & > v2)receives > > RIP v2 updates, how does it process those unused fields within v1, > say > > subnet mask. According to Jeff Volume I, it would ignore them but > my RIP > > v1 router does show up the network address as well as subnet mask, > > please advise. > > > > Best Regards. > > Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Nnanna Obuba CCIE # 6586 __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48109&t=48072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
available bandwidth [7:48110]
I have noticed "available bandwidth" that shows up when you give the command "sh int serial" on the router? if i give "no fair queue" this statement does not appear in the o/p of sh interface ser command. Can anybody suggest whether WFQ (which is enabled by default on serial interfaces) does have any performance impact on the serial port? and also how is the figure arrived at ? Any answers on this would be greatly appreciated. rgds, Uday Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48110&t=48110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C or B class network [7:48111]
I have two locations one with 20 servers and 150 users, and the other close by with 150 users, they are connect with a 100Mbits fiber connection, I am using sperate C-class networks for these locations, but now I need to change the IP network to eighter another C-class network or a B-class network, would the b-class not be the best way to go Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48111&t=48111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What a mess...... [7:48005]
The 5500 and 3550 run differant OS so learning set based CLI may not do much good if it is no longer in the lab. The 2900 is the same as the 3550 if your not running EMI software on the 3550. I don't know if the lab is using the 3550 for layer 3. Dave Juan Blanco wrote: > > Team, > Last month I bought for my lab a 5500 switch for my lab and now Cisco > changed the requirement for a 3550.. > My question is what will be an equivalent to the 3550, will I be use any > 29XX, I don't want to spent more money, Does it make any sense to keep the > 5500 > > No money on my packet and many things to do and to buy. > > J -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48016&t=48005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPSec with IP Unnumbered Interface [7:48100]
It's not yet supported to terminate IPSec tunnels on a unnumbered Interface. -Antonio ""Firesox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know how to configure IPsec Tunnel to terminate at an IP Address > that is confiugred with ip unnumbered command? > Serial 0/0 is using ip unnumbred f0/0 on 2621 router. > IPSec doesn't seem to like the ip unnumbered interface or the loopback as > its termination point > I am trying not to reconfiugre the entire IP scheme for a large > organization. If there is a way to make it work with ip unnumberd on serial > interface, it could save me a lot of time and aggrevation. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48112&t=48100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how good the LAB Center in Brazil [7:48113]
Hello, How are you? Has anyone on this board attempted their lab in Brazil? If so, how good is the center? I remember once, someone complained about how it small room and very slow Telnet connection as well as it was hot. Anyway idea... I am thinking of booking my lab in Brazil as N.America waiting time is too much. Faisal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48113&t=48113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: available bandwidth [7:48110]
Avail BW is always 75% of the bandwidth of the interface. The remaining 25% is taken by the router to protocol overhead, routing overhead, etc.. It can be changed with "max-reserved-band" command. WFQ above e1 is slower then just sending the packets, but some sort of queueing is needed no matter what speed if voice is on network. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""uday"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have noticed "available bandwidth" that shows up when you give the command > "sh int serial" on the router? > > if i give "no fair queue" this statement does not appear in the o/p of sh > interface ser command. > > Can anybody suggest whether WFQ (which is enabled by default on serial > interfaces) does have > any performance impact on the serial port? > and also how is the figure arrived at ? > > Any answers on this would be greatly appreciated. > > rgds, > Uday Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48114&t=48110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: C or B class network [7:48111]
I'm not sure what the 3rd class C is for, but if you are combining the two networks, just use a subnetted /23 -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Arni V. Skarphedinsson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have two locations one with 20 servers and 150 users, and the other close > by with 150 users, they are connect with a 100Mbits fiber connection, I am > using sperate C-class networks for these locations, but now I need to change > the IP network to eighter another C-class network or a B-class network, > would the b-class not be the best way to go Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48116&t=48111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP [7:48091]
Good luck! Vance ""Cisco Die-Hard"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > > I am currently trying to implement VOIP for the first time using Cisco > routers. Can you please give me a URL or any resource where i can read about > this step by step or go through a simulation. > > THIS IS URGENT, I APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSE. > > Cisco Die-Hard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48115&t=48091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP [7:48091]
Ok, that's weird. I swear I put links in therelet's try again with them in the middle of the message instead of at the top... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/index.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voip/voip.shtml Good Luck! Vance ""Vance Krier"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Good luck! > Vance > > > > > ""Cisco Die-Hard"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Team, > > > > I am currently trying to implement VOIP for the first time using Cisco > > routers. Can you please give me a URL or any resource where i can read > about > > this step by step or go through a simulation. > > > > THIS IS URGENT, I APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSE. > > > > Cisco Die-Hard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48118&t=48091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast - Cisco and Bay [7:48094]
Forget CGMP as I neglected to take the BAY 450's into account (I'd sell the Bay's back to Cisco and get new 3550's). IGMP/PIM will send prune messages if no members try to join the multicast group, otherwise ACL's if the 4006 is L3 may be used in certain situations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Is there a way to contain Multicast traffic to certain access points. I have > a Cisco 4006 core with old Baystack 450 hubs/switches on the outside. > Currently the multicast server is connected and users start experiencing > slight disconnects on mapped drives etc.. > The multicast traffic is staying on this LAN only and NOT going near a > router. Can I restrict which ports get multicast and which not?? > > Thanks in advance > > Andrew Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48117&t=48094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP community Q [7:48119]
Omer, Yes thats what i want any route containing As 200 in its path should have the community number added to it. But the problem is the community is not being added even though it shows routes with 200 in it.Yes look out for what Carlos says as it may get u. If u see the logic it seems to be adding 100:900 which should not happen as all those routes have 200 in them weather originating or coming via 200. So is this a bug or ? could not locate any on this ? All routers are using 12.1(5)T code on them -2500's. Looks its a bug ? = Thanks in advance for ur time and replies. Annu. __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48119&t=48119 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AS numbers makes the difference right? [7:48099]
need to make a correction wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Morgan > > Routers enter into their routing table routes to 'directly connected' > networks. In this case I will assume that, 192.168.3.0 is a directly > Connected Network for both RTA and RTB. This would be designated by C in the > routing Table. > > Even though you may be running IGRP on both routers, you are running them > with different processes or AS numbers. IGRP processes with different AS's > do not share information unless specifically configured to do so with the > redistribute command. > > If however RTA was running EIGRP with Process 100 and RTB was running IGRP > with Process 100, then the routers would share information. This is the only > time you don't have to do 'work' to make two different routing protocols > talk to each other. This of course only occurs when the Process numbers are > the same for EIGRP and IGRP. CL: the automatic redistribution will take place only if IGRP and EIGRP occur on the SAME router. There will be no eighbor relationship formed if on different routers. > If the AS numbers were different, then you once > again have to revert to Redistribute commands to make the routers learn each > others' routes. > > Looking at your example, the only 'common' network between RTA and RTB is > 192.168.3.0, the rest are unique hence RTA not showing .8 and .5 networks > and RTB not showing .2 and .5 networks > > Hope this clears this up. > > Manish > > -Original Message- > From: Morgan Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 July 2002 15:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AS numbers makes the difference right? [7:48099] > > > Guys, im going completely mental over here! Im afraid my brain is going to > go BOOM in a second! > > Heres the thing; > > Say you have 2 routers, with their respective routing tables right. > Router-A have these networks in its routing tabel: > > 192.168.2.0 > 192.168.3.0 > 192.168.4.0 > > And Rouer-B has these: > > 192.168.3.0 > 192.168.8.0 > 192.168.5.0 > > Now, what makes me crazy here is that I know that by looking at this, I can > tell that Router-A and Router-B have directly connected networks, and > therefore in Router-Bs routing tabel all of Router-As networks + Router-Bs > networks will show. > > But! Now this is a BIG BUT! > > If, say Router-A has the as number 100 (That is router igrp 100), and > Router-B has the as number 101 (router igrp 101). Then they are NOT directly > connected and therefor will not share routing table's right??? Or?? > > I mean, the as numbers decide this if im not entirelly wrong (which I most > def could be) Please, like ive said im going totally bananas over this and > need some help. > > If in fact Router-Bs routing table will show both Router-As and its own > networks, then. Is this because of the use of IGRP? Cause im reading the > Wendel Odom book here, and it says, I quote; > > "The following list summarizes the behavior of a router that uses the RIP-1 > or IGRP distance vector routing protocols: > > -Routers add DIRECTLY CONNECTED subnets to their routing tables. Routers do > not need to run a routing protocol to learn connected routes, but conneced > subnets routes are advertised to neighboring routers by the routing > protocol". > > Ok, this I know. But, im confused about the as numbers here (100 vs 101) > Because of this I would figure that Yes, Router-Bs routing table would > normally show us both Routers networks (being directly connected and > all) BUT, not when the as numbers are different. CL: you may want to adjust your thought process here, and move to a "top down" approach ( to borrow a phrase ) CL: routing protocols all have somewhat different methods of operation, based on different assumptions. RIP assumes one big flat network. OSPF assumes a structure based upon "areas", with a backbone at the center connecting various non backbone areas. BGP, IGRP, EIGRP assume "autonomous systems", but have provisions for connecting to other AS's. CL: so, in terms of how things are configured: RIP is configured in a straighforward manner, with no indication of process or area or AS. Router rip network x.x.x.x that's all there is. OSPF is configured in terms of area. However, over time it has been recognized that for whatever reason you may want to have different OSPF "processes" on the same router. Probably as one means of structuring very large networks. Howard could offer more insight as to the history of this. My understanding is that no routing protocol scales much above a couple thousand routers, and so an organization like a large bank with 15,000 routers might break its netowrk into a number of "regions" with a couple of core routers joining those regions together via redistribution of multiple OSPF processes. So with OSPF, you can insitute more than one OSPF process on the same router, and those two processes operate independently. router ospf 100 network a.b.c.d x.x.x.x area 0 router os
RE: CISSP [7:48095]
I have the CISSP cert. I took the test and passed it on May 18, 2002. I'm now working on my CCIE. I passed the written and have a lab date on January 13, in San Jose. I'm not sure if I'll be ready though. Tom Fortier CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CISSP, CNA -Original Message- From: Jarred Nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 5:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CISSP [7:48095] If there are any CISSP certified professionals out there, I would like to talk to you one on one about the certification. I am very interested in obtaining this cert in the future (I want to go into security). I am going to be a freshman in College in the fall incase anyone was wondering why I said I wanted to go into security. So please if anyone has this certification e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jarred Nicholls CCNA, CCNP Routing Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48123&t=48095 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how good the LAB Center in Brazil [7:48113]
What is the wait time in North America ? Does any one know ? There is a lab in Vienna, Brussels...Does anyone have info on that. Please advise. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48122&t=48113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless and Etherchannel [7:48124]
Hi, who have experience with wireless bridging over etherchannel to collect more than 2 wireless lines to one line? Best regards, Holger. --- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48124&t=48124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how good the LAB Center in Brazil [7:48113]
Hello, I had a look at the seat available is Brussels today. They had seats available in july. regards, DT ""Shaheen Gagan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What is the wait time in North America ? Does any one know ? > There is a lab in Vienna, Brussels...Does anyone have info on that. > Please advise. > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48125&t=48113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay Question [7:48126]
Hi, Reading a document on Frame Relay it was mentioned that : B(e)= T(c)*Access Rate And it has mentoned that access rate is the clocking rate; the maximum rate at which the data can be transfered. My question is that if the Access rate is the maximum rate,how can the B(e) be greater than the access rate. Thanks in advance, Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48126&t=48126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how good the LAB Center in Brussels [7:48113]
How is their lab, I mean equipment and stuff. Do you have any info Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48127&t=48113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RIP V1&V2 [7:48072]
Thanks, did some more lab tests, at least ios 11.0.16 rip v1 doesn't accept v2 updates neither broadcast nor multicast, which ios 12.1 does. Leo Best regards. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nnanna Obuba Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RIP V1&V2 [7:48072] The real issue here is the particular vendor's implementation of RIP v1... If I Was to implement RIP v1 , I would certainly allow it to accept routes from RIP v 2 speakers, this is for robustness and to guard against misconfiguration bringing the entire network down. N --- Chuck wrote: > without having had the chance to verify this for myself, I can offer > that > someone who occasionally lurks on this list once told me about a good > RIP > lab he designed, in which this issue is covered. His purpose in > designing > this particular lab was to demonstrate exactly what you are > reporting, and > to show how you can get screwed as a result. > > I've been meaning to look at this for some time now. Don't know if > I'll have > a chance in the near future, but if I do, I will certainly report the > result. > > Chuck > > > > ""Leo Song"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, there. > > > > In case a RIP v1 speaking router (Send v1 and Receive v1 & > v2)receives > > RIP v2 updates, how does it process those unused fields within v1, > say > > subnet mask. According to Jeff Volume I, it would ignore them but > my RIP > > v1 router does show up the network address as well as subnet mask, > > please advise. > > > > Best Regards. > > Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Nnanna Obuba CCIE # 6586 __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48128&t=48072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipv6 question [7:48129]
My company would merge with another company soon. Both companies use 10.0.0.0/8 subnet, so we have to change one of them. I'm thinking maybe it's a good chance to go ipv6. What do you guys think on this? Will ipv6 go enterprise soon? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48129&t=48129 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
