RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
yes, me too Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73004t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
Yes, I am receiving a few mails from Nobody :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NOBODY emails [7:72997] Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73002t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error on an interface FastEthernet of a router 3745 [7:73000]
HI Joseba, I have mostly seen the IP Fast Switching on the same interface in the disabled mode by default, and you have forcefully enabled it. Try to disable it and see the results. HTH Vikram -Original Message- From: Joseba Izaga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 6:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Error on an interface FastEthernet of a router 3745 [7:72610] Hi, Do you now the reason of the folowing message: 11:31:40: %GT96K_FEWAN-5-UNDERFLOW: Transmit underflow on int FastEthernet0/0 11:31:40: %GT96K_FEWAN-5-UNDERFLOW: Transmit underflow on int FastEthernet0/0 This is configuration I have on the interface interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 63.80.132.16 255.255.255.0 ip route-cache same-interface ip policy route-map mail speed 100 full-duplex Regards, Joseba Izaga Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73000t=73000 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
I am one, received 13 of them last night. Paul: I am sure you would be working on this. Vikram -Original Message- From: Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NOBODY emails [7:72997] Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73001t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
YES! At 03:56 AM 7/25/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj + International Network Services Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDP, CISSP Sr. Network Systems Consultant Northwest Operation - Sacramento Office Voicemail: (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager: (800) 467-1467 Text Page: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.ins.com + Every Job is a Self-Portrait of the person Who Did It...Autograph Your Work With EXCELLENCE! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73003t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Starting off towards a CCNP [7:72734]
Thanks God, Thanks father and mother, Thanks friends who's helped me, I've passed my BCRAN 642-821 exam yesterday, the score to pass is 790, the exam has 67 questions, 75 minutes, one simulation (one for my exam, simulation is not difficult, cisco said that you should not spend more than 10 minues for one simulation question) and it's the first exam of mine toward CCNP After the exam, I realize that, it is not very difficult to pass CCNP exams if you could spend time to study CCNP materials, documents on Cisco website and doing some labs, simulator software is a good choice for inexpensive labs Goodluck to me and you all Thanh MN Vietnam Datacommunication Company 292 Tay Son, Hanoi, Vietnam Nakul Malik wrote: I would recommend the following order: Routing -- Switching -- Remote access -- Support -Nakul wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] hi ppl, Im planning to start on my ccnp--- first step joined groupstudy (as i did for my ccna ;-) ). Just have a few queries regarding the certification. 1. I have the CCNP materials dated 2000. do they still hold good for the current certifications? 2. Im planning to start of with the BCRAN certification first. Any opinions on that? thanks in advance... regards, aj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73005t=72734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
yup -Original Message- From: Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 25 July 2003 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NOBODY emails [7:72997] Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73006t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
I got .. about 10 emails At 03:56 25/07/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73007t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test [7:73008]
Apologies for the e-mail but I have not received any e-mails last night and I am not aware of any scheduled down time @ GroupStudy. This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates (the sending company ) any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business or client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the accessing of any files attached to this e-mail. At present, the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed and messages sent via this medium are potentially at risk. The recipient should scan any attached files for viruses. All liability arising as a result of the use of this medium to transmit information by or to e-Innovation is excluded to the extent permitted by law. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73008t=73008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How many CCIEs in India ?? [7:73010]
Hi I am very curious to know how many CCIEs are there in India. Does Cisco publish this info on its site? Thanks Ganesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73010t=73010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
Thank you for your replies, think I've got it now. Tim Champion wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for most situations. It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. Cheers Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73009t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How many CCIEs in India ?? [7:73010]
Cisco publish CCIE numbers worldwide online. Check this site out for updated list. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73011t=73010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
YES !!\!\!!! Quoting Darren Crawford : YES! At 03:56 AM 7/25/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj + International Network Services Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDP, CISSP Sr. Network Systems Consultant Northwest Operation - Sacramento Office Voicemail: (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager: (800) 467-1467 Text Page: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.ins.com + Every Job is a Self-Portrait of the person Who Did It...Autograph Your Work With EXCELLENCE! Iwan Hoogendoorn Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73012t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How many CCIEs in India ?? [7:73010]
Yah, They do publish that on site. Last time I had a look, we had some 37 CCIEs in India. Vikram -Original Message- From: Ganesh I [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How many CCIEs in India ?? [7:73010] Hi I am very curious to know how many CCIEs are there in India. Does Cisco publish this info on its site? Thanks Ganesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73013t=73010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
I4m just beeing tired of that person. antero -Original Message- From: Taufik Kurniawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2003 07:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997] I got .. about 10 emails At 03:56 25/07/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj *** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo sao confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organizacao para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu esta mensagem por engano por favor notifique a Compta atraves do endereco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema MAILsweeper nao tendo sido encontrados virus. http://www.mimesweeper.com MAILsweeper - Modulo da suite MIMEsweeper, solucao de filtragem de conteudos comercializada pela Compta SA. A Compta SA detem o mais alto nivel de especializacao MIMEsweeper, tendo sido reconhecida pela Clearswift como Premier Partner. *** This message is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Compta by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73014t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Friday Funnies [7:73016]
Two peanuts walk into a rather rough bar, not looking for any trouble. Unfortunately, one was a salted. - A jump lead walks into a bar. The barman says, I'll serve you, but don't start anything. - A dyslexic man walks into a bra. - A man walks into a bar with a roll of tarmac under his arm and says: Pint please, and one for the road. - A man goes to a fancy dress party dressed only in his Y-fronts. A Woman comes up to him and says, What are you supposed to be? The man saysA premature ej*culation. What? says the woman? The man explains,I've just come in my pants. - Two aerials meet on a roof, fall in love get married. The ceremony was rubbish but the reception was brilliant. - Two cannibals are eating a clown. One says to the other: Does this taste funny to you? - Man with a strawberry stuck up his bum goes to the doctor. The Doctor says, I'll give you some cream to put on it. - Doc, I can't stop singing 'The green, green grass of home'. That sounds like Tom Jones syndrome. Is it common? Well...It's not unusual. - Two cows standing next to each other in a field, Daisy says to Dolly I was artificially inseminated this morning. I don't believe you, said Dolly. It's true, straight up, no bull! - A guy walks into the psychiatrist wearing only cling film for shorts. The shrink says, Well, I can clearly see you're nuts. - Two hydrogen atoms walk into a bar. One says, I think I've lost an Electron. The other says, Are you sure? The first replies, Yes, I'm positive. - Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bullsh!t before - A man takes his Rottweiler to the vet and says, My dog's cross-eyed, Is there anything you can do for him? Well, says the vet, let's have a look at him So he picks the dog up and examines his eyes, then checks his teeth. Finally, he says, I'm going to have to put him down. What? Because he's cross-eyed? No, because he's really heavy - Two elephants walk off a cliff .. boom boom! - Apparently, 1 in 5 people in the world are Chinese. And there are 5 people in my family, so it must be one of them. It's either my mum or my dad. Or my older brother Colin. Or my younger brother Ho-Cha-Chu. But I think it's Colin. - I went to buy some camouflage trousers the other day but I couldn't find any. - I went to the butchers the other day and I bet him 50 quid that he couldn't reach the meat off the top shelf. And he said, No, you're right he said, the steaks are too high. - My friend drowned in a bowl of muesli. He was pulled in by a strong currant. - I went to a really energetic Seafood Disco last week and pulled a mussel. - Two Eskimos sitting in a kayak were chilly; but when they lit a fire in the craft, it sank, proving once and for all that you can't have your kayak and heat it too. - A man walks into doctor's office. What seems to be the problem? asks the doc. It's ... um ... well ... I have five peni*es. replies the man. Blimey! says the doctor, How do your trousers fit? Like a glove. - Our ice cream man was found lying on the floor of his van covered with Hundreds and thousands. Police say that he topped himself. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our ***UPDATED*** website - www.sysdom.org And ***PLEASE*** Sign our guest book - we are feeling that nobody loves us! === IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s)named above and
CCNP recertification in two weeks [7:73015]
What Boson test is good practice for CCNP recertification ? _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73015t=73015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emails from Nobody [7:73017]
Our spool directory on GroupStudy filled causing messages to be sent out as nobody with no subject and no body. If you have received e-mails from Nobody please ignore. The complete message may be found on the message boards at www.groupstudy.com . Take care, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73017t=73017 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emails from Nobody [7:73018]
Our spool directory on GroupStudy filled causing messages to be sent out as nobody with no subject and no body. If you have received e-mails from Nobody please ignore. The complete message may be found on the message boards at www.groupstudy.com . Take care, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73018t=73018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
No, I won't think that these mails are sent by some person. I have a rule on my outlook application which sends all mails addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to a specific folder, but this one is directly coming to my Inbox, so I feel that it will be a Server or mailing application (Majordomo I believe) bug, which is sending personally addressed blank mails to some or all the list members. Just my point though. Vikram -Original Message- From: Antero Vasconcelos To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/25/03 3:51 PM Subject: RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997] I4m just beeing tired of that person. antero -Original Message- From: Taufik Kurniawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2003 07:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997] I got .. about 10 emails At 03:56 25/07/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifying transport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj *** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo sao confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organizacao para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu esta mensagem por engano por favor notifique a Compta atraves do endereco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema MAILsweeper nao tendo sido encontrados virus. http://www.mimesweeper.com MAILsweeper - Modulo da suite MIMEsweeper, solucao de filtragem de conteudos comercializada pela Compta SA. A Compta SA detem o mais alto nivel de especializacao MIMEsweeper, tendo sido reconhecida pela Clearswift como Premier Partner. *** This message is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Compta by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73019t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Funnies [7:73016]
Thank you, I needed that! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dom Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Friday Funnies [7:73016] Two peanuts walk into a rather rough bar, not looking for any trouble. Unfortunately, one was a salted. - A jump lead walks into a bar. The barman says, I'll serve you, but don't start anything. - A dyslexic man walks into a bra. - A man walks into a bar with a roll of tarmac under his arm and says: Pint please, and one for the road. - A man goes to a fancy dress party dressed only in his Y-fronts. A Woman comes up to him and says, What are you supposed to be? The man saysA premature ej*culation. What? says the woman? The man explains,I've just come in my pants. - Two aerials meet on a roof, fall in love get married. The ceremony was rubbish but the reception was brilliant. - Two cannibals are eating a clown. One says to the other: Does this taste funny to you? - Man with a strawberry stuck up his bum goes to the doctor. The Doctor says, I'll give you some cream to put on it. - Doc, I can't stop singing 'The green, green grass of home'. That sounds like Tom Jones syndrome. Is it common? Well...It's not unusual. - Two cows standing next to each other in a field, Daisy says to Dolly I was artificially inseminated this morning. I don't believe you, said Dolly. It's true, straight up, no bull! - A guy walks into the psychiatrist wearing only cling film for shorts. The shrink says, Well, I can clearly see you're nuts. - Two hydrogen atoms walk into a bar. One says, I think I've lost an Electron. The other says, Are you sure? The first replies, Yes, I'm positive. - Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bullsh!t before - A man takes his Rottweiler to the vet and says, My dog's cross-eyed, Is there anything you can do for him? Well, says the vet, let's have a look at him So he picks the dog up and examines his eyes, then checks his teeth. Finally, he says, I'm going to have to put him down. What? Because he's cross-eyed? No, because he's really heavy - Two elephants walk off a cliff .. boom boom! - Apparently, 1 in 5 people in the world are Chinese. And there are 5 people in my family, so it must be one of them. It's either my mum or my dad. Or my older brother Colin. Or my younger brother Ho-Cha-Chu. But I think it's Colin. - I went to buy some camouflage trousers the other day but I couldn't find any. - I went to the butchers the other day and I bet him 50 quid that he couldn't reach the meat off the top shelf. And he said, No, you're right he said, the steaks are too high. - My friend drowned in a bowl of muesli. He was pulled in by a strong currant. - I went to a really energetic Seafood Disco last week and pulled a mussel. - Two Eskimos sitting in a kayak were chilly; but when they lit a fire in the craft, it sank, proving once and for all that you can't have your kayak and heat it too. - A man walks into doctor's office. What seems to be the problem? asks the doc. It's ... um ... well ... I have five peni*es. replies the man. Blimey! says the doctor, How do your trousers fit? Like a glove. - Our ice cream man was found lying on the floor of his van covered with Hundreds and thousands. Police say that he topped himself. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies Visit our ***UPDATED*** website - www.sysdom.org And ***PLEASE*** Sign our
Re: RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
ios bug has hit the mailing lists too... - Original Message - From: Antero Vasconcelos Date: Friday, July 25, 2003 4:21 pm Subject: RE: NOBODY emails [7:72997] I4m just beeing tired of that person. antero -Original Message- From: Taufik Kurniawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2003 07:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997] I got .. about 10 emails At 03:56 25/07/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that are empty?? Larry Puckette Network Analyst Temple Inland [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-434-1838 Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Vty access class [7:72990] I believe the standard ACL should be enough since your already specifyingtransport input ssh on line vty 0 4. Just my $0.02 Jablonski, Michael wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access. Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it works fine... ip access-list extended local_shell permit tcp host 192.168.1.2 host 192.168.1.1 eq 22 vty 0 4 access-class local_shell in transport input ssh Is the standard enough is the above over-kill? Thanx, mkj *** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo sao confidenciaise para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organizacao para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu esta mensagem por engano por favor notifique a Compta atraves do endereco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema MAILsweeper nao tendo sido encontrados virus. http://www.mimesweeper.com MAILsweeper - Modulo da suite MIMEsweeper, solucao de filtragem de conteudoscomercializada pela Compta SA. A Compta SA detem o mais alto nivel de especializacao MIMEsweeper, tendosido reconhecida pela Clearswift como Premier Partner. *** This message is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed exceptfor the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error,please notify Compta by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeperfor Content Security threats, including computer viruses *** Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (on sprinter) The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire confidentiality clause. - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73021t=72997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Funnies [7:73016]
Those are great! But I think a few of them need to be translated for us Americans. ;-) Mark E. Hayes 7/25/03 7:43:02 AM Thank you, I needed that! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dom Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Friday Funnies [7:73016] Two peanuts walk into a rather rough bar, not looking for any trouble. Unfortunately, one was a salted. - A jump lead walks into a bar. The barman says, I'll serve you, but don't start anything. - A dyslexic man walks into a bra. - A man walks into a bar with a roll of tarmac under his arm and says: Pint please, and one for the road. - A man goes to a fancy dress party dressed only in his Y-fronts. A Woman comes up to him and says, What are you supposed to be? The man saysA premature ej*culation. What? says the woman? The man explains,I've just come in my pants. - Two aerials meet on a roof, fall in love get married. The ceremony was rubbish but the reception was brilliant. - Two cannibals are eating a clown. One says to the other: Does this taste funny to you? - Man with a strawberry stuck up his bum goes to the doctor. The Doctor says, I'll give you some cream to put on it. - Doc, I can't stop singing 'The green, green grass of home'. That sounds like Tom Jones syndrome. Is it common? Well...It's not unusual. - Two cows standing next to each other in a field, Daisy says to Dolly I was artificially inseminated this morning. I don't believe you, said Dolly. It's true, straight up, no bull! - A guy walks into the psychiatrist wearing only cling film for shorts. The shrink says, Well, I can clearly see you're nuts. - Two hydrogen atoms walk into a bar. One says, I think I've lost an Electron. The other says, Are you sure? The first replies, Yes, I'm positive. - Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bullsh!t before - A man takes his Rottweiler to the vet and says, My dog's cross-eyed, Is there anything you can do for him? Well, says the vet, let's have a look at him So he picks the dog up and examines his eyes, then checks his teeth. Finally, he says, I'm going to have to put him down. What? Because he's cross-eyed? No, because he's really heavy - Two elephants walk off a cliff .. boom boom! - Apparently, 1 in 5 people in the world are Chinese. And there are 5 people in my family, so it must be one of them. It's either my mum or my dad. Or my older brother Colin. Or my younger brother Ho-Cha-Chu. But I think it's Colin. - I went to buy some camouflage trousers the other day but I couldn't find any. - I went to the butchers the other day and I bet him 50 quid that he couldn't reach the meat off the top shelf. And he said, No, you're right he said, the steaks are too high. - My friend drowned in a bowl of muesli. He was pulled in by a strong currant. - I went to a really energetic Seafood Disco last week and pulled a mussel. - Two Eskimos sitting in a kayak were chilly; but when they lit a fire in the craft, it sank, proving once and for all that you can't have your kayak and heat it too. - A man walks into doctor's office. What seems to be the problem? asks the doc. It's ... um ... well ... I have five peni*es. replies the man. Blimey! says the doctor, How do your trousers fit? Like a glove. - Our ice cream man was found lying on the floor of his van covered with Hundreds and thousands. Police say that he topped himself.
RE: Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
Here's some text from CCO regarding CEF and using source and destination IPs to map a packet to one of a set of load sharing links: Configuring Per-Destination Load Balancing Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you enable CEF. To use per-destination load balancing, you do not perform any additional tasks once you enable CEF. Per-destination load balancing allows the router to use multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. Traffic destined for different pairs tend to take different paths. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you enable CEF, and is the load balancing method of choice for most situations. The URL for the above is (watch wrap): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca6ca.html#1000956 John Neiberger wrote: Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: John Neiberger wrote: Tim Champion wrote: Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for most situations. It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. Cheers Tim This probably depends on the switching mechanism in place. Fast switching, as I recall, simply caches the outgoing interface for any given destination so it's relying on the destination information only. Yes, fast-switching caches the outgoing interface for a destination. All packets to a particular destination go out the same interface. CEF works that way too if you use the default. CEF uses both the source and destination. I don't think that is true? CEF doesn't look at source addresses. I just checked this on our 7513 running 12.2(17a). If you use the command show ip cef exact-route sourceip destinationip you'll see the cached exit interface. If you do this with several source addresses going to the same destination when there are multiple paths you'll see that they use different exit interfaces. I wonder if the default behavior has changed as CEF has evolved? John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73026t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Equation to calculate the Bandwidth [7:72888]
I quit the OVForum because what certain people were doing pissed me off. Besides, from what I remember there was way too much newbie questions being asked that just wasted my time. I mean, how many times do I have to tell people how to properly setup DNS for a network management system? Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: gab S.E jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Equation to calculate the Bandwidth [7:72888] Hi, Il use the example you gave above using a 10MB = 1000 (bits) lets assume at t(time) InOctet was 4000 OutOctet was 3000 Total=7000 You have to convert the total In and Out octects(bytes) to bits(the link speed is in bits) hence to multiply by 8 7000*8=56000 56000/1000 (all in bits) = 0.0056 * 100 (to get a percentage) =0.56 (less than 1 percent of the bandwidth is being used at that time) this just to show you the calculation. But as Priscilla said utilization only makes sense in respect to the total bandwidth, available capacity and also as a function of time. Fred went a bit more deeper and detailed which actaully explains how best to inteprete utilization e.g on wan links etc Fred - dont see any more posts from you in the Ovforum anymore. regards, seun Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73023t=72888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vty access class [7:72990]
I think the extended named access list don't allow you to say eq to at the end. Also make sure you have domain-name, rsa key on the router. and then try this. RSA key don't show in the config, to test if you have rsa key try this: router#show crypto key mypubkey rsa then try this. username test password 0 test ip domain-name router.test.com ip ssh time-out 60 ip ssh authentication-retries 2 access-list 101 permit 22 host 10.1.1.2 host 10.1.1.1 line vty 0 4 access-class 101 in login local transport input ssh Hope this helps. Raj:) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73022t=72990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Equation to calculate the Bandwidth [7:72888]
FRED dont really go on it any more myself (oVforum or the itrc HP NNM forum) either, havent been on it for many months since Dougie, Jim Sheedfar and some others quit I stopped going on it as well. I didnt mind answering newbie questions but after a while it just got so routine. regards, gab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73029t=72888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails from Nobody [7:73018]
Thanx Paul. Larry Puckette Senior Network Analyst Temple Inland/Austin Data Center 512/434-1838 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the only idol is money and power, there is no hope for integrity. -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 6:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Emails from Nobody [7:73018] Our spool directory on GroupStudy filled causing messages to be sent out as nobody with no subject and no body. If you have received e-mails from Nobody please ignore. The complete message may be found on the message boards at www.groupstudy.com . Take care, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73028t=73018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwidth on serial interface??? [7:72966]
The bandwidth and thus the metric will be different depending on the direction of traffic. All metrics are calculated from the outgoing interfaces along the route. P245 Routing TCP/IP Vol I Doyle. This particular quote is in reference to IGRP. I'll assume, without testing, that it also applies to EIGRP. -Original Message- From: Sreekanth yandapalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bandwidth on serial interface??? [7:72966] Hi, I just have a question how will the router determine the serial interface bandwidth? In one of my eigrp test, I just find the bandwidth on both sides of a single serial connection is different. You can see from below, 7200's is 1544K, and 3640 is 128K. 7200--- serial --- 3640 on 7200: show inter Serial2/2 Serial2/2 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is M4T Internet address is 170.10.10.2/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, on 3640: show inter Serial1/0 Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is CD2430 in sync mode Internet address is 170.10.10.4/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 128 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, Thanks, Rayan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73027t=72966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Per-destination load balancing [7:72944]
At 2:34 PM + 7/25/03, p b wrote: Here's some text from CCO regarding CEF and using source and destination IPs to map a packet to one of a set of load sharing links: Configuring Per-Destination Load Balancing Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you enable CEF. To use per-destination load balancing, you do not perform any additional tasks once you enable CEF. Per-destination load balancing allows the router to use multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. Traffic destined for different pairs tend to take different paths. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you enable CEF, and is the load balancing method of choice for most situations. The URL for the above is (watch wrap): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca6ca.html#1000956 I think the problem here is the documentation author, not IOS. It seems fairly clear to me that said author doesn't understand the difference between traditional destination cache and source-destination hash. This hasn't been the first time strange things have happened. I remember that I looked at the original description of OSPF demand circuits and just blinked. First, I knew from the OSPF Working Group how they were supposed to work. Second, I knew the developer who wrote the code, and also wrote English very well. I sent him an email, and he responded he had absolutely no idea, either, what the documentation was trying to say. He observed his C code, even uncommented, was more readable. John Neiberger wrote: Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: John Neiberger wrote: Tim Champion wrote: Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken from CCO): Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute packets based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even if multiple paths are available. For example, given two paths to the same network, all packets for destination1 on that network go over the first path, all packets for destination2 on that network go over the second path, and so on. Per-destination load balancing is enabled by default when you start the router, and is the preferred load balancing for most situations. It was my understanding that per-destination load balancing was based on the destination address only and not on the source/destination pair. If someone could clarify it would be much appreciated. Cheers Tim This probably depends on the switching mechanism in place. Fast switching, as I recall, simply caches the outgoing interface for any given destination so it's relying on the destination information only. Yes, fast-switching caches the outgoing interface for a destination. All packets to a particular destination go out the same interface. CEF works that way too if you use the default. CEF uses both the source and destination. I don't think that is true? CEF doesn't look at source addresses. I just checked this on our 7513 running 12.2(17a). If you use the command show ip cef exact-route sourceip destinationip you'll see the cached exit interface. If you do this with several source addresses going to the same destination when there are multiple paths you'll see that they use different exit interfaces. I wonder if the default behavior has changed as CEF has evolved? John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73031t=72944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP recertification in two weeks [7:73015]
I just passed it 2 weeks ago. I have the Boson exam but that did not help me. What will help you the stuff from CCxx Production. You get the CCNP and CCDP recert for about $60. Hope this helps Reza johnman johnman wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What Boson test is good practice for CCNP recertification ? _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73025t=73015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCxx Productions Recertification Exams [7:73032]
Hi Team, I'm trying to find out how good CCxx Productions would be for the CCNP recertification exam. Thank you, JoeT MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73032t=73032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CBWFQ Newbie [7:73034]
Hi guys, Just a quick one and am sure this has been asked many times. Two rtrs with serial line between them. On one router ! hostname QOS-RTR1 ! class-map Data-Service match access-group name Data-Hosts ! class-map Voice-Service match access-group name Voice-Hosts ! policy-map Customer1 class Data-Service bandwidth percent 50 class Voice-Service bandwidth percent 20 ! ip access-list extended Data-Hosts permit ip host 10.1.1.22 any ip access-list extended Voice-Hosts permit ip host 10.1.1.21 any ! Interface serial0/0 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x Service-policy out Customer1 bandwidth 512 Now, if there is only a data stream running from the one configured host in the ACL, and I have a 512k line, This data traffic even though it is configured for 50% of the bandwidth, can automatically use 100% of the bandwidth (if I have the max-bandwidth thing set to 100) Correct? Then if I start the voice stream from the other host, that has 20% of the bandwidth, this will then scale down the data traffic so that the 20% bandwidth can be guaranteed for the voice stream. Please can someone confirm. Many thx indeed. Ken Farrington Global Networks, Barclays Capital, 5 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4BB * Tel : 020 7773 3550 * Mob : 07768-866655 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73034t=73034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Capturing IPv6 packets. [7:73033]
Hello everybody, I am wondering if there is any tool like Sniffer / Ethereal which allows capturing and analysing IPv6 traffic? Thanks, Rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73033t=73033 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP recertification in two weeks [7:73015]
johnman johnman wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What Boson test is good practice for CCNP recertification ? don't know about B*O*S*O*N, but two years prepping for the CCIE lab was more than adequate in my case ;- _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73037t=73015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless LAN Design Specialist exam - 950-576 [7:73036]
Took and passed this test today. If you take the recommended classroom training, this is more than adequate preparation. If you don't have the time to take a week off for the classroom training, I recommend using CCO resources plus spending the few dollars for the B*O*S*O*N Wireless SE practice test. The practice tests themselves are probably overkill, at least for the exam I saw. However, Dennis Laganiere did an excellent job not only with the questions, but with explanations and links to web pages both on CCO and elsewhere for background material. It's not that wireless is all that difficult. Like BGP, once you dig into it, things aren't so mysterious. With wireless, the keys appear to be FCC regs, radio RF behaviour, Cisco product line, antennas, wireless vocabulary, and of course, security aspects. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73036t=73036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCxx Productions Recertification Exams [7:73032]
I use them and passed 2 weeks ago. Their documents are good and I paid for both CCNP and DP about $60. Hope this helps Reza Joseph R. Taylor wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Team, I'm trying to find out how good CCxx Productions would be for the CCNP recertification exam. Thank you, JoeT MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73035t=73032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
port redirection [7:73038]
Hi all I am switching out a linksys piece of shi% to a 501. We had someone come in and set it up because I am new to the firewall. I see a command Conduit permit tcp host 10.30.30.30 eq 1723 any and conduit permit gre host 10.30.30.30 any The IP is an example but I know this is allowing 1723 and gre. but it is just allowing to the 501 correct? A win 2k box is the actual vpn server so I need it redirected to lets say 192.168.1.11 I don't know what the eq means I want to do port redirection with static command. what would be the full command/s need to redirect this to 192.168.1.11 I know that it is not being redirected now because I see no reference telling it to do so or to what box. Do i have to have a fixup protocol tcp 1723 and fixup protocol GRE 0 ? then ip address outside ip address inside I believe the commands are static (inside,outside tcp 207.22.22.22 1723 10.30.30.30 1723 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,outside) gre 207.22.22.22 0 10.30.30.30 0 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 what are the 0 0 for? are those two commands all I need to do? Thanks Keith j Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73038t=73038 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How many CCIEs in India ?? [7:73010]
Hi ganesh, Obviously, You can trust cisco for these kinda information http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html Regards Guruprasad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ganesh I Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How many CCIEs in India ?? [7:73010] Hi I am very curious to know how many CCIEs are there in India. Does Cisco publish this info on its site? Thanks Ganesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73039t=73010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE [7:65426]
That is hilarious. Can I plagiarize it for my biography? -l0stbyte Juan Blanco wrote: Team, I got this from a friend but I not sure if you have seen this or not but only someone pursuing the CCIE would laugh at it!! In the course of my day-to-day work, people ask me what is a CCIE? I thought about this for some time. I wrote some notes. And this is what I came up with: I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling 8 foot computer racks and charming magnetic security cardswipes. I have been known to remodel SME networks on my lunch breaks, making them more efficient in the area of capital deployment, reliability and performance. I translate technobabble for Management, I write award-winning technical presentations and deliver them better than an American president announcing tax cuts. I can recite complete chapters of the Cisco Documentation CD, backwards and, with little effort and at the same time, perform decimal to binary conversion for very large numbers. I woo women with my sensuous and godlike MIDI playing on a notebook. I can pilot computer trolleys up severe inclines with unflagging speed, and I can rack Cisco gear faster than Arnold Schwarznegger can bench press. I am an expert in network diagramming tools, a veteran in web surfing, and know the Cisco Web Site better than I know my own family. Just to keep it interesting, I occasionally tread water for three days while programming Cisco practice labs. I manage time efficiently and can complete a timesheet every week. In addition, I know the part number for every Cisco router cable. Using only a Chinese AC power cord and a large glass of water, I once single-handedly rebuilt the network core of major co-location facility after the roof fell in. I used to play games, but now it's serious. I am the subject of numerous urban myths and I am the creator of a few as well. When I'm bored, I test fiber optic cable, calculate power loss sums on UTP and the minimum refraction index for 50 micron multimode fiber. I mean, what IS the point of it ? I understand that DLSW and Source Route Translational Bridging actually has a reason for existence. It's not just IBM playing a practical joke. Really. I enjoy urban guerilla activities. I can build a 802.11b parabolic dish antennae using surplus antennae from defunct satellite companies and a juice can. It has better performance than off the shelf products. I think that having a wind generator and solar array as power backup for my practice lab is not only responsible preparation, it's environmentally friendly too. On Wednesdays, after work, I repair old monitors free of charge for my local charity. I know that canonical to non-canonical conversion is not about religion, it's about ART. Microsoft geeks worldwide swoon over my original line of corduroy evening wear, which I don't understand -- it was supposed to be funny. I don't perspire. I am a private citizen, yet I receive fan mail. I have been caller number ten and have won the cash jackpot. I can speak IPX NLSP, AppleTalk, ATM PVC, QoS, and BGP to name a few, and redistribute routes at will, with filtering, using non contiguous masks. I install IPV6 on customer sites whenever I can, just so I can play with it. Same for OSPF NSSA. Children trust me. I can hurl squishy giveaway tradeshow toys at sales personnel with stunning accuracy, and ensure that the dweeb from administration gets the blame. I have charisma beyond normal mortals; if I didn't the boss would have sent the other guy to this exam. I once read Cisco Quality of Service, Caslow Bridges and Routers 2nd Ed, and Jeff Doyles' Routing TCP/IP Vol2 in one day, and still had time to do practice on a Frame Relay multipoint network, using OSPF and IGRP, split horizon, route maps and ISDN. I know the exact location of every food item in the supermarket and I use a link state protocol to calculate the shortest path to get there. I have performed several covert operations with the CIA. It was kind of fun having them follow me around. I know that security and privacy is a phantasm-like myth created by security companies to extract money from IT Managers who can't implement a decent security policy. But it's great fun to play with. I sleep once a week; when I do sleep, I sleep in a chair. I know exactly how much coffee my body will take to sustain me at peak function. While on vacation, I successfully negotiated with the hotel to fix their network in return for free accommodation. The laws of society do not apply to me. I balance, I weave, I dodge, I frolic, and my bills are all paid. On weekends, to let off steam, I participate in full-contact tech stock day trading. Years ago I discovered the meaning of life but forgot to write it down. I can originate default routes, conditionally, after redistributing from a classful distance vector protocol. I have made extraordinary four course meals using my Cisco 7500 lab router as a stove (after all
Re: CBWFQ Newbie [7:73034]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Just a quick one and am sure this has been asked many times. Two rtrs with serial line between them. On one router ! hostname QOS-RTR1 ! class-map Data-Service match access-group name Data-Hosts ! class-map Voice-Service match access-group name Voice-Hosts ! policy-map Customer1 class Data-Service bandwidth percent 50 class Voice-Service bandwidth percent 20 ! ip access-list extended Data-Hosts permit ip host 10.1.1.22 any ip access-list extended Voice-Hosts permit ip host 10.1.1.21 any ! Interface serial0/0 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x Service-policy out Customer1 bandwidth 512 Now, if there is only a data stream running from the one configured host in the ACL, and I have a 512k line, This data traffic even though it is configured for 50% of the bandwidth, can automatically use 100% of the bandwidth (if I have the max-bandwidth thing set to 100) Correct? Then if I start the voice stream from the other host, that has 20% of the bandwidth, this will then scale down the data traffic so that the 20% bandwidth can be guaranteed for the voice stream. Please can someone confirm. Many thx indeed. Ken Farrington I think you want to use a variation on CBWFQ called LLQ. This uses the priority command instead of bandwidth, to assign voice traffic to a Priority Queue which will take precedence over other traffic. In other words: policy-map Customer1 class Data-Service priority 50 class Voice-Service bandwidth percent 20 Here's a link to the priority command http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/fqcprt2/qcfwfq.htm#1022204 and here's a link to an LLQ example: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/qossol/qosvoip.htm#xtocid12 HTH, Jonathan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73042t=73034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCxx Productions Recertification Exams [7:73032]
I've used them in the past and highly recommend them. Joseph R. Taylor wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Team, I'm trying to find out how good CCxx Productions would be for the CCNP recertification exam. Thank you, JoeT MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73044t=73032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CBWFQ Newbie [7:73034]
That is how I understand it. For voice I would use 'priority' instead 'bandwidth'. Regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73041t=73034 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Capturing IPv6 packets. [7:73033]
Couple of options based on web searching. Ipgrab - http://ipgrab.sourceforge.net/ Ethereal - http://www.ethereal.com/ Linux Based sniffer - http://members.tripod.com/~YohanFernando/sniffer.html Others possibly such as dsniff. Ian www.ccie4u.com Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios starting at $20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajesh Kumar Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Capturing IPv6 packets. [7:73033] Hello everybody, I am wondering if there is any tool like Sniffer / Ethereal which allows capturing and analysing IPv6 traffic? Thanks, Rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73047t=73033 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE required in UAE. [7:72879]
Well, It translates to about 5500 USD/month. Anyone who is interested please email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] afshin mehrpouya wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CCIE required in UAE-Dubai for an international solution provider company. Min salary 2 derhems/month. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73045t=72879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE [7:65426]
thats hilarious! http://www.badminston.demon.co.uk/stucco.html -Original Message- From: l0stbyte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE [7:65426] That is hilarious. Can I plagiarize it for my biography? -l0stbyte Juan Blanco wrote: Team, I got this from a friend but I not sure if you have seen this or not but only someone pursuing the CCIE would laugh at it!! In the course of my day-to-day work, people ask me what is a CCIE? I thought about this for some time. I wrote some notes. And this is what I came up with: I am a dynamic figure, often seen scaling 8 foot computer racks and charming magnetic security cardswipes. I have been known to remodel SME networks on my lunch breaks, making them more efficient in the area of capital deployment, reliability and performance. I translate technobabble for Management, I write award-winning technical presentations and deliver them better than an American president announcing tax cuts. I can recite complete chapters of the Cisco Documentation CD, backwards and, with little effort and at the same time, perform decimal to binary conversion for very large numbers. I woo women with my sensuous and godlike MIDI playing on a notebook. I can pilot computer trolleys up severe inclines with unflagging speed, and I can rack Cisco gear faster than Arnold Schwarznegger can bench press. I am an expert in network diagramming tools, a veteran in web surfing, and know the Cisco Web Site better than I know my own family. Just to keep it interesting, I occasionally tread water for three days while programming Cisco practice labs. I manage time efficiently and can complete a timesheet every week. In addition, I know the part number for every Cisco router cable. Using only a Chinese AC power cord and a large glass of water, I once single-handedly rebuilt the network core of major co-location facility after the roof fell in. I used to play games, but now it's serious. I am the subject of numerous urban myths and I am the creator of a few as well. When I'm bored, I test fiber optic cable, calculate power loss sums on UTP and the minimum refraction index for 50 micron multimode fiber. I mean, what IS the point of it ? I understand that DLSW and Source Route Translational Bridging actually has a reason for existence. It's not just IBM playing a practical joke. Really. I enjoy urban guerilla activities. I can build a 802.11b parabolic dish antennae using surplus antennae from defunct satellite companies and a juice can. It has better performance than off the shelf products. I think that having a wind generator and solar array as power backup for my practice lab is not only responsible preparation, it's environmentally friendly too. On Wednesdays, after work, I repair old monitors free of charge for my local charity. I know that canonical to non-canonical conversion is not about religion, it's about ART. Microsoft geeks worldwide swoon over my original line of corduroy evening wear, which I don't understand -- it was supposed to be funny. I don't perspire. I am a private citizen, yet I receive fan mail. I have been caller number ten and have won the cash jackpot. I can speak IPX NLSP, AppleTalk, ATM PVC, QoS, and BGP to name a few, and redistribute routes at will, with filtering, using non contiguous masks. I install IPV6 on customer sites whenever I can, just so I can play with it. Same for OSPF NSSA. Children trust me. I can hurl squishy giveaway tradeshow toys at sales personnel with stunning accuracy, and ensure that the dweeb from administration gets the blame. I have charisma beyond normal mortals; if I didn't the boss would have sent the other guy to this exam. I once read Cisco Quality of Service, Caslow Bridges and Routers 2nd Ed, and Jeff Doyles' Routing TCP/IP Vol2 in one day, and still had time to do practice on a Frame Relay multipoint network, using OSPF and IGRP, split horizon, route maps and ISDN. I know the exact location of every food item in the supermarket and I use a link state protocol to calculate the shortest path to get there. I have performed several covert operations with the CIA. It was kind of fun having them follow me around. I know that security and privacy is a phantasm-like myth created by security companies to extract money from IT Managers who can't implement a decent security policy. But it's great fun to play with. I sleep once a week; when I do sleep, I sleep in a chair. I know exactly how much coffee my body will take to sustain me at peak function. While on vacation, I successfully negotiated with the hotel to fix their network in return for free accommodation. The laws of society do not apply to me. I balance, I weave, I dodge, I frolic, and my bills are all paid. On weekends, to let off steam, I participate in full-contact tech stock day trading. Years ago I discovered the meaning of life but forgot to
RFC 2547 vs. RFC 2764 VPNs [7:73048]
I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from them but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based, which apparently means it does not use MPLS like 2547-based VPNs. I'm curious about the implications of choosing one model over the other. I thought the market trend was toward MPLS-based VPNs but 2764 seems to argue against that. What are the implications of choosing one model over the other? Are there any major drawbacks to either one that the other addresses? I'm also a little concerned about vendor choices. Nortel seems to be pushing 2764, while Cisco and possibly Juniper are pushing 2547 and MPLS. Is that correct? If so, is that really that important to the customer? Forgive me if these questions seem pretty vague. I'm still learning about the technologies involved and I'm not very familiar with the specifics and the terminology. I'll put in a plug here for Howard's book _Building Service Provider Networks_. Among a number of things it discusses some of these VPN technologies and has been very helpful the last couple of days during my research. John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73048t=73048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP recertification in two weeks [7:73015]
interesting question, there is only one exam from Boson for CCNP recert, there is I think a typo on the webpage where it says test #2 in the bio for the author. also only one exam for CCDP recert. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: johnman johnman To: Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 6:51 AM Subject: CCNP recertification in two weeks [7:73015] What Boson test is good practice for CCNP recertification ? _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73049t=73015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC 2547 vs. RFC 2764 VPNs [7:73048]
John Neiberger wrote in message ... I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from them but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based, which apparently means it does not use MPLS like 2547-based VPNs. I'm curious about the implications of choosing one model over the other. Use the source, John. Read the RFC's, think of the protocol complexity, check and see if there is any opensource working code (or even examples of code)...even if you don't understand code, you understand `wc -l', right? Now, think of the popularity aspects as well...how many good coders would implement it, and how long have they had to debug it? There are other factors to consider...especially when looking at a vendor. What is the problem you are trying to solve? What are your requirements for your service? For some reason, I doubt your VP or Director is going to reward you for implementing something with MPLS in the service offeringbut they might reward you for replacing Frame-Relay or ATM (or even IPSec-based iVPN's) with a more cost-effective, or better working, solution. Finally, when deciding on a product you have to look at all the non-technical requirements as well...especially cost (both the hard costs and the soft, hidden costs). Supportability (for you and for Qwest, and for Qwest's equipment vendor of choice, etc). There are lots of things to consider, really. I thought the market trend was toward MPLS-based VPNs but 2764 seems to argue against that. What are the implications of choosing one model over the other? Are there any major drawbacks to either one that the other addresses? How about AToM vs. MPLS-VPN or 2547bis vs. Martini? Or Martini vs. Kompella? Or Kompella vs. Kompella (do a LR search for that, it's really funny)? What about L2TPv3/PWE3 vs. any of the above? Does one consider GRE or IP-in-IP? IPSec? How about Interworking (also known as mix-and-match)? When you say MPLS-VPN, I immediately think 2547however, that's becoming less-and-less true. In fact, I don't believe the two largest successful offerings of MPLS-VPN (Level-3's (3)Packet and GX's Smart/ExpressRoute) use 2547 MPLS-VPN's. They use something else. But other vendors don't even use MPLS-VPN to solve the CE-VPN (or even IP-VPN) problem. I'm also a little concerned about vendor choices. Nortel seems to be pushing 2764, while Cisco and possibly Juniper are pushing 2547 and MPLS. Is that correct? If so, is that really that important to the customer? Cisco is/was pushing two things: UTI and EoMPLS (and now the full line of AToM), mostly non-MPLS PWE3 or MPLS-VPN with Martini. Juniper is/was pushing CCC and K.Kompella. Laurel is/was pushing Martini... this list could go on forever. The new game in town is TiMetra (who was purchased by Alcatel), with VPLS by V.Kompella. Everybody now wants VPLS. It's super bleeding-edge, but the technology works great (on paper). Forgive me if these questions seem pretty vague. I'm still learning about the technologies involved and I'm not very familiar with the specifics and the terminology. You should read LR (Lightreading) and go to SuperComm if you really want to get into this stuff. If you really want to understand it, well then you only have one option: RFCs, loose consensus and running code. I, personally, do not want to get heavily into it. It's not mature technology, and it's all bad, IMO. There are a few solid technologies...and they are mostly the ones that were implemented first. Sure, MPLS-VPN with 2547 is great, but it scales horribly and is difficult to manage. It also is dependent on an MPLS core, with no route summarization, full IBGP with MP-BGP, and all the rest of the hooks. It uses two (and if you are using MPLS-TE, then three) labels to work, so it's big and kludgy. And you add all sorts of bugs and overhead to get it working. So if MPLS-VPN with 2547 is poor, think about how all the rest of this stuff also breaks things all the time. It's all poorly implemented! If you want it, you have to pay the price for it. IMO, I think UTI and L2TPv3 with Sprint or CW have been incredibly as successful as Level-3 and GX's MPLS-VPN products...maybe not in Europe, but that doesn't mean the technology doesn't work thereit's just that MPLS-VPN is very popular in Europe (and Asia). Don't make decisions based on popularity contests or superior technology or even by using what's bleeding or cutting edge. Make the best decision you can with the criteria you set forward with. *Don't* follow a market trend ; I'll put in a plug here for Howard's book _Building Service Provider Networks_. Among a number of things it discusses some of these VPN technologies and has been very helpful the last couple of days during my research. Here's some good reading that I recommend (Howard's book is also vv good!). Warning: it's quite a lot of [EMAIL
Re: RFC 2547 vs. RFC 2764 VPNs [7:73048]
hey, John, I understand there is an update to RFC 2549, due out Real Soon Now, which might help you out here. John Neiberger wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from them but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based, which apparently means it does not use MPLS like 2547-based VPNs. I'm curious about the implications of choosing one model over the other. I thought the market trend was toward MPLS-based VPNs but 2764 seems to argue against that. What are the implications of choosing one model over the other? Are there any major drawbacks to either one that the other addresses? I'm also a little concerned about vendor choices. Nortel seems to be pushing 2764, while Cisco and possibly Juniper are pushing 2547 and MPLS. Is that correct? If so, is that really that important to the customer? Forgive me if these questions seem pretty vague. I'm still learning about the technologies involved and I'm not very familiar with the specifics and the terminology. I'll put in a plug here for Howard's book _Building Service Provider Networks_. Among a number of things it discusses some of these VPN technologies and has been very helpful the last couple of days during my research. John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73052t=73048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC 2547 vs. RFC 2764 VPNs [7:73048]
John Neiberger wrote: I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from them but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based, which apparently means it does not use MPLS like 2547-based VPNs. I'm curious about the implications of choosing one model over the other. I thought the market trend was toward MPLS-based VPNs but 2764 seems to argue against that. What are the implications of choosing one model over the other? Are there any major drawbacks to either one that the other addresses? I'm also a little concerned about vendor choices. Nortel seems to be pushing 2764, while Cisco and possibly Juniper are pushing 2547 and MPLS. Is that correct? If so, is that really that important to the customer? Forgive me if these questions seem pretty vague. I'm still learning about the technologies involved and I'm not very familiar with the specifics and the terminology. I'll put in a plug here for Howard's book _Building Service Provider Networks_. Among a number of things it discusses some of these VPN technologies and has been very helpful the last couple of days during my research. John Also worth looking at is the hardware component: what will run on the hardware you've already got (if anything)? IF you already have most or all of the hardware pieces to implement Cisco's version, then Cisco's probably makes sense. IF you already have the requisite Nortel gear (Passports?), you're probably only looking at upgrading to a new PCR (software version). And there's the training and management aspect -- which suite do you know better? Where is the rest of your network going--will money spent learning Passport command line be transferable to other devices, offering a savings there? My guess is no, but it could be possible. Finally, what's the underlying architecture -- Passport at its heart is an ATM switch, and Nortel's VPNs using virtual routers still looks an awful lot like IP over ATM, with all the overhead in play there. If it's Passport they're pitching at you, have a good look at the layer 2 technology on switch egress. What I saw was: [data+(local IP hdr)+(carrier IP hdr)+layer2 formatting] as it went through the cloud. Potentially, that's a lot of overhead. If that's not a problem, fine. Annlee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73051t=73048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Switching Exam [7:73053]
Hi, I just joined the group. I'm going to take the CCNP switching exam next month. I'm now studying the Cisco book and doing the practice exams on the CD (which came with the book). Any other suggestions on good practice exams besides that? Jen Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73053t=73053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
