RE: Anybody know the difference between Aironet Base station [7:7830]
Todd, The Base Station is really intended to install for a small environment (say the home of an exec). The thing has a modem in it and can be configured to dial your corporate network as needed. This way the exec uses wireless (via Access Point) at the office and just needs to turn their laptop on at home to connect automatically (via the Base Station). I don't know if I would agree with Tony's '... It's a cheap peice of s---. It's for customers that are really watching the buck ...' comment, as the two devices are really intended for different purposes. BTW: Make sure that you get the 350 series as it has a stack of cool features - like CDP. Adam -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 8 June 2001 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Anybody know the difference between Aironet Base station and [7:7674] [demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text] Hi, All I recently had a chance to install Aironet wireless enviromment. I was confused about the difference between Aironet Base station and Aironet Access point. Is it the same device or they have different function ? Thanks!! Todd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7830&t=7830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: So is the IOS version with IPv6 finally available? [7:6691]
Check out: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/ipv6/ Click on 'Learn About Cisco IOS IPv6' Click on 'Obtain IOS Beta Software' The doco states that you need 12.2(0.5)T - not 12.2(1)T. You have actually been able to get hold of this stuff for a while - but only via the engineering site - not the standard software download area. Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "NRF" To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: So is the IOS version with IPv6 finally available? [7:6691] > Has anybody gotten the IOS version that has Ipv6? I know Cisco said it was > going to be available at the end of May, and it's the end of May. According > to Cisco's Web site, the version is 12.2(1)T, but when I go to the download > center, I don't see any 12.2(1) T option. > > Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6694&t=6691 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Cost of NM-4E in Australia [7:6538]
I have an NM-4E on loan to a client at the moment and they have (finally) decided that they will be purchasing one of these modules to use in their 2600 on a permanent basis. They have asked me if I would be interested in selling mine, which could save them a fair amount as they are an expensive module. This module is from my lab and is surplus to my needs anyway (at the moment). Can anyone suggest a fair price (in Aust. Dollars) for a second-hand NM-4E? I have never seen one for sale locally so am unsure of the going rate. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6538&t=6538 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab setup [7:4872]
Rashid, > I am thinking of replacing my collection of 25xx routers with modular > routers to practise lab scenarios for CCIE. You should be able to practice the majority of lab simulations on your 2500's, unless you were thinking of purchasing some ATM gear. > Please can you advise whether it would be advisable to get rid of my 2511 > and buy a 2-Port Asynch NM to give my my 16 Asych RJ45 feeds. The async modules seem very expensive and just take up a good port on your 2600/3600, that could be used for something else. If you are only using it for reverse telnet, there is no need to spend the money to upgrade to a 2600/3600. Don't forget that the 2511 also has two serial ports that can be used in your lab, a lot of people seem to think that the 2511 is only good as an access server and nothing else. > I am also thinking of buying a 4-Port Serial T1 Card for my 3600, to give me > 6 Serial interfaces to practise most FR scenarios, instead of buying a > 2521/2522. I have a 2621 and 2611 each with 2 x WIC-2T modules, for a total of eight serial ports. You can configure the routers as a frame relay switch and tunnel PVC's between individual boxes to provide an eight-way frame relay switch. This leaves the NM slots available for voice or ATM or whatever else you wanted to install. As your router is a 3600, you could also add an NM-2E2W and 2 x WIC-2T modules so rather than just four serials to a slot, you get 4 serial and 2 ethernet interfaces. Or as an added bonus a NM-1E1R2W and 2 x WIC-2T, to give you 1 ethernet, 1 token ring and 4 x serial. > coupled with my regular 2600 with FE, 1003, and 2 x 1750's 4v's (2xFXS Cards > & Bri) . I think I should have enough routers to practise even complex > scenarios. I think you would be better served by keeping the 2511 and perhaps getting rid of a 2500 (or two) to get some modules for the 3600. Hope this helps. Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4947&t=4872 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
Unlike Ethernet with a simple X-Over canbe, in order to connect two TR devices together you need a MAU of some type. Enter the 3920 ... Other than Cat5K modules, they really don't have any choice for the lab, as they need to find a way to get TR devices to communicate. There is nothing really 'special' about the 3920, but I wouldn't imagine Cisco would want to use a Synoptics (or other non-Cisco) MAU for the lab. Adam -Original Message- From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2001 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] So whats so special about the 3920? The only thing I see is Joken ring. I'm just starting my CCNP so IE is realistically a year out. Do you think with the rate companies are ditching joken ring gear it will still be on the test by then. Crapple talk has gone pretty much gone away. Eugene ""Darren Crawford"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will > see > in the lab. > > Darren > > At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: > >Here's what I have so far: > >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module > >2516 > >2507 > >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable > >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to > >spend) > >One 10U desktop rack $55 > > > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet > >deal. > >Eugene > > > > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > >> > >> 2501- $550 > >> 2502- $404 > >> 2503- $630 > >> 2504- $540 > >> 2511- $900 > >> 2523- $900 > >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 > >> > >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) > >> > >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on buying > >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You > >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating VLANS. > >> > >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > >> > >> Fred > >> > >> >From: "EA Louie" > >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > >> > > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a > >> >CCIE > >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > >> >studygroup. > >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > >know. > >> > > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > >> > > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > >> >1-2503 --- ISDN > >> >1-2504 --- ISDN > >> >1-2514 - dual eth > >> >1-2515 - dual t/r > >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > >exist > >> >(F/R switch) > >> >1-2924-XL > >> >teltone isdn simulator > >> >3 token ring MAUs > >> >3 token ring media filters > >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > >> >4 Ethernet hubs > >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables > >> >rack > >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) > >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > >> > > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > >> >possession > >> >by accident, > >> >so be it ;-) > >> > > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > >types > >> >required to > >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > >I'd > >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > >> > > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think > >> >it's > >> >achievable with $4000? > >> > > >> >-e- > >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> _ > >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > *** > Darren S. Crawford > Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services > 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 > Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 > Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.lucent.com Network Systems > Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written > >
Re: Juniper Job Market (was: Passed CCIE Written but NOT doing [7:3962]
~ 460,000 worldwide jobs on monster.com... Non-US 'Cisco' = 919 Non-US 'Juniper' = 22 (Only in UK & Europe) Guess it will be a while for the rest of the world to realise that their Cisco certs are no good. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Bradley J. Wilson" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: Juniper Job Market (was: Passed CCIE Written but NOT doing lab) [7:3690] > Carroll Kong wrote: > > >...but also makes you wonder if the market space is really that > >big for heavy duty core work. > > > I just did an impromptu and informal search on geekfinder.com - I put in the > word "Cisco" and pulled up 905 jobs nationwide, both contract and perm. > Then I did the same search for "Juniper" and pulled up only 46 jobs. You be > the judge. ;-) > > BJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3962&t=3962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498]
I have 8 2500's, two 2600's and a 4500M, all with Kingston Flash and DRAM and I have never had a problem with any of them. Regards Adam -Original Message- From: xc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 April 2001 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: has anybody tried non-Cisco approved flash/memory [7:2498] I need to upgrade some of my lab routers to handle 12.0 and 12.1. These IOS's are resource hogs, so apparently I need to pump up the DRAM and flash. So, has anybody tried out some of those non-Cisco approved DRAM and flash units? Don't worry, none of my routers are going to be used in a production environment. But I won't do it if these units completely blow some circuit on the router. XC FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2506&t=2498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 26xx support for NM-1E1R2W
A month or so ago, I recall someone on the list saying that they were successful in getting an NM-2E2W running in a Cisco 26xx. Has anyone managed (or even tried) to get a NM-1E1R2W card running in a 26xx router? Was it successful? I am aware that even if this configuration worked, is not supported by Cisco, but assume that I am only interested in getting this working in a lab. Thanks Adam _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic - Contact in China
I will be travelling to China (Beijing) next week and will have some = time to look around and see the sights, and am looking for a local = contact. As a few of the messages I have received from this list have = originated from China, I was wondering if anyone would be willing to = answer a few questions for me. =20 If you can help me, please reply direct to this address, otherwise sorry = about the waste of bw. Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: **Login Scripts (Long)
> I have users in branches all across the company that logon to other > BDC's in other city's. Eg. Someone in vancouver logging into say > montreal. > Does anyone know of a port that I can block that off of each branch > router ( im currently using 3661's ) to stop that. Or a Win2k setting I > can modify to specify what server to login to?.I know i can probably > specify that in that in the login script, if so, What command do I use? > Or a registry setting in Win2k/9x I assume that you are using NT 4 servers in the backend? If you are using Win2K servers, you can make the NT/9x clients Active Directory aware by installing DSClient.exe, which will 'encourage' the clients to authenticate with their local DC before running over the WAN to a random DC. There is no real way to control what DC authenticates a client in the NT 4 world, and you can't block a logon script 'port' as the client runs the logon script using a UNC path (ie. \\DCNAME\netlogon\yourscript.bat). The only way to stop this would be to block all file sharing traffic over the link (which I assume you don't). A way around the problem is to use a batch file that allows initial authentication to occur at any DC, but then forces the logon script to execute from a local DC. The basic idea is to run ipconfig on the client, which will output the IP address, network mask and default router. These settings are saved to a text file and can be searched the matches on the default router value can be made to determine the LAN that the user is logging in from. Sample script: @echo off rem The CFG_SVR is your 'default' DC, probably the PDC or at least a DC rem closest to the 'centre' of your NT network. This is an initial value to rem ensure that the script always has a server to contact. set CFG_SVR=DEFDC rem If Windows 95 - need to copy down ipconfig.exe in order to rem complete the following task. Always do the initial copy rem from CFG_SVR. All other OS's have a compatible copy of rem ipconfig.exe installed with their TCP/IP stack. ver | find /I "95" if not errorlevel 1 goto 95_98 goto ALL_SYS :95_98 if not exist %windir%\ipconfig.exe copy \\LOGON5\netlogon\bin\ipconfig.exe %windir%\ipconfig.exe :ALL_SYS net use /persistent:no > NUL rem Find the current subnetwork by checking the output from ipconfig rem against a list of known default router addresses ipconfig > %windir%\ipconfig.logon type %windir%\ipconfig.logon | find /I "10.1.1.254" > NUL if not errorlevel 1 goto SITE1 type %windir%\ipconfig.logon | find /I "10.1.1.254" > NUL if not errorlevel 1 goto SITE2 goto SLOW_NET :SITE1 rem In this section you set the CFG_SVR variable to a DC at the specific site rem that you are trying to control the logon script for. Then once you have rem set the variable, you can execute a logon script on a specific server that rem has been created for this site only. Remember that the CFG_SVR rem variable will be available to the new batch file (in this case SITE1.bat) rem so you can use it to launch other processes on a specific server in a rem controlled fashion. set CFG_SVR=SITE1DC echo. echo Current LAN: SITE1 echo LAN Logon Server: %CFG_SVR% start /wait \\%CFG_SVR%\netlogon\SITE1.bat goto RUN_MAIN :SITE2 set CFG_SVR=SITE2DC echo Current LAN: SITE2 echo LAN Logon Server: %CFG_SVR% start /wait \\%CFG_SVR%\netlogon\SITE1.bat goto RUN_MAIN :SLOW_NET rem This part of the script is just a handler for unknown rem networks or in the event of an error. set CFG_SVR=DEFDC echo. echo Current LAN: Remote or Unknown echo LAN Logon Server: %CFG_SVR% echo echo NOTICE: echo. echo You have connected to the network echo from an unknown or undefined location echo. echo Please call the Help Desk for Assistance. echo. pause goto RUN_MAIN :RUN_MAIN echo Script Completed set CFG_SVR= Hope this helps. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Tcpip Transmission over RS232
> >Back to back rs-232 DCE/DTE. Just like v.35 but, up to 128 kb/s you can > >run HDLC, PPP and or Frame obviously w/ a frame switch. I would guess that this would also be possible with back-to-back DTE cables using a null modem adaptor. Has anyone tried this before? Adam - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:06 AM Subject: Re: OT: Tcpip Transmission over RS232 > Here's a response that someone sent directly to me. I thought it was worth > sharing with the group. I don't know if it's true, but it could generate > some good discussion... > > > >Back to back rs-232 DCE/DTE. Just like v.35 but, up to 128 kb/s you can > >run HDLC, PPP and or Frame obviously w/ a frame switch. > > > > > > > > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > >Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: OT: Tcpip Transmission over RS232 > > >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:15:19 -0800 > > > > > >At 01:07 AM 2/22/01, Amit Gupta wrote: > > > >Hi All, > > > > > > > >Just a thought on Whether Tcp/Ip can run over RS232 > > > >Interfaces. > > > > > >Can't see why not. You could get TCP/IP running over a coat hanger if you > > >tried enough. Seriously, a terminal server can enable PCs to connect via > > >RS-232 to a TCP/IP network. > > > > > >Priscilla > > > > > > > > > >Any comments please ? > > > > > > > > > > > >Regds > > > > > > > >Amit > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for second-hand equipment in Australia
This message probably only applies to people in Australia/NZ I am looking for some second hand Cisco gear, preferably in Australia = (cheap freight). If anyone has (or can get hold of) the following, I am = interested: 2 x Cisco 2513/2612/2613 (or combination) Ethernet/Token Ring/Serial = Routers. Any IOS. Any RAM config. 1 x Cisco 4000/4500/4700 (or variant). Any module configuration. Any = IOS. Any RAM config. 1 x NP-2E Dual Ethernet Port for Cisco 4000 series. 1 x NP-2T Dual Serial Port for Cisco 4000 series. 2 x CAB-NPX21C (X21 DCE cable for Cisco 4000) OR 2 x CAB-NPX21T (X21 DTE = cable for Cisco 4000). They do not need to be X21 but I would prefer = X21 or V35. I am only interested in realistic prices as these are for personal use = (ie. I'm not really interested in purchasing new gear). I would also consider trade on some other gear that I have, including: 4 Port BRI for 4000 Series ISDN WIC's for 1600, 2600, 3600, etc 2 x High Density X21 DTE Cables (used with WIC-2T) NM-2E2W (2 Ethernet, 2 WIC for 3600) NM-4E (4 Ethernet for 2600, 3600) 2503 (Ethernet, Serial & ISDN) 2514 (14 Ethernet Hub Ports, Serial, ISDN) Other assorted stuff. Please respond direct to my email address. Regards Adam Burgess AustEcom Pty Ltd Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cat 5000 !
This generally means that the packet was not returned and there was no specific error (ie. no response at all, rather than an unreachable or administratively denied, etc). Does your switch has a default route configured? Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 8:28 AM Subject: Cat 5000 ! > Hi ! All, > > Has anyone seen this error before while pinging from one switch to other > switch? > > " Ping XX.YY.ZZ.AA: error=0 " > > Cheers. > > > > === > WARNING > This message may contain information that is confidential > and may be subject to the provisions of section 61A of the > Police Act 1958, which creates an offence to have unlawful > possession of Police documents. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message or have received > this message in error, you must not peruse, use, pass or > copy this message or any of its contents. > > Also note, the views expressed in this message may not > necessarily reflect those of the New Zealand Police. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN
Jim, You can schedule the exchange site connector (providing you are not using a 'Site Connector'). I would suggest X400 connector for this purpose. This will allow you to control when the exchange server communicates between sites. NT 4.0 DC relationships don't really have any way to schedule synchronisation between servers but you could always upgrade to Windows 2000 if you really needed to schedule the sync. What will be defined as 'interesting traffic' to bring up the ISDN connection? If you can control this outside the NT 4 world, then you could create an access list to block NetBIOS over TCP/IP and RPC traffic and allow the necessary traffic. X400 could be configured to send messages immediately (which would dial the connection) or as needed in the X400 connector, and you could schedule your directory connector between the two sites to only synchronise a couple of times a day, to keep the traffic on the link to a minimum. This would still allow your PDC/BDC to synchronise when the link is available, but would not dial the link or keep it active after the idle timeout. Remember that your clients need to have access to the PDC to reset their passwords and you won't be able to do any administration work on the domain from the site with the BDC, unless the line is active. It would probably be better to configure each site with a PDC in different domains and configure a two-way trust between them. Exchange will still work (I would suggest configuring with a service account local to the specific exchange server, and use the 'override' security function when connecting between sites) but you will not have problems relating to NT 4 replication. Let me know if this helps - I can provide more info if needed. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Jim Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 12:18 PM Subject: ISDN > Hello, > > We are trying to set up an ISDN from China to US. In > order to lower the ISDN charge, we'll put a BDC and an > Exchange server locally. The concern is BDC to PDC and > exchange servers sync will make the ISDN line up all > the time. Any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ghost Server and clients using multicast
Jeff, My understanding of the Ghost multicast clients is that they use the OSI Packet Driver, and support layer 2 multicast only (ie. cannot be routerd through VLANs). You may need to put a multicast server in any VLAN where there are clients (remember that the server does very little and could just be an ordinary PC). Another option would be to purchase an Intel Server Pro (or similar) card that supports VLAN trunking at the server, so the one multicast server system could be logically connected to all VLANs. Adam - Original Message - From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 2:06 AM Subject: Ghost Server and clients using multicast > Does anyone have experience working with a Ghost Server that multicast? I > have a 6509 and 4006's in the closets with multiple VLANs and having > troubles with the client using a boot floppy. It works fine if you iniate > from the server though. > > Thanks in advance, > Jeff > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER
This occurs after a software upgrade or downgrade to inform you that configurations may not be 100% compatible between versions. You can normally get rid of the message by saving the configuration file into NVRAM under the new IOS. You should probably find that after doing a 'copy run start' and 'reload', that the message no longer appears on boot. Regards Adam > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Michael Ibidunni > Sent: February 14, 2001 4:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER > > > > Folks, > > I was wondering if someone can assist me in solving this problem or > direct me to a link on > cisco's web site to solve this problem. I upgraded the IOS on my 2513 from > 11.1 to 12.0 and after > that whenever I start the router it comes up with the following message > :%SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: > Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly under > stood. From my search on cco, I upgraded the boot roms which I got from > cisco, but that didn't > solve the problem, HELP. > > Thanks in advance > > > > = > Michael Ibidunni > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3640 Access server ISDN and PSTN Dial in
Charles, Here is a cut of a config I use on a 3640 to achive this (This router has 12 MICA modems in slot 1 - the remainder of the PRI timeslots are used for incoming ISDN calls): controller E1 2/0 pri-group timeslots 1-31 ! interface Serial2/0:15 ip unnumbered Loopback0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice modem no peer default ip address ppp authentication pap ppp multilink ! interface Group-Async 1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive async mode dedicated peer default ip address pool default no cdp enable ppp authentication pap group-range 33 44 Regards Adam Burgess - Original Message - From: "Clare, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:10 PM Subject: 3640 Access server ISDN and PSTN Dial in > > Hi All. > > Trying to set up a 3640 for ISDN and PSTN Dial in. Have E1 and 30 > Digital Modems. Have set-up a Group-Async for Modem uses and all works > fine. Question is how do I set up so ISDN callers are handled in the same > way. Does not seem to be a Group-Dialer command. Does it require me to > setup 30 Dialler interfaces ? > > Thanks in advance. > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re cat 1900 enterprise version
Nandit, The default config for 1900's (at least when upgraded from standard edition) is to support bridge groups and not VLAN's. You can change this once you have the EN software in the menu by going to the System menu and choosing 'Reset system to enable VLANs' (or something like that). This should enable VLANs on the switch. Adam - Original Message - From: "nandit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: Re cat 1900 enterprise version > Hi, > I was able to upgrade from the standard edition to the enterprise version on > a switch with the image cat1900EN_9_00_03.bin.bin, but am not getting any > VLAN configuration utilities.Which version is required for VLAN > configuration. > Thanks > Nandit > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD (Correction on Typo)
Sorry - previous message should have read: Correct - although you don't need to specify 'ppp multilink' in order to bring up multiple channels, you only need to use 'dialer load-threshold'. This enables bandwidth on demand and seems to provide the same throughput and functionality as ppp multilink. If you specify dialer load-threshold AND ppp multilink, then the interfaces switches to 'industry standard' ppp multilink. I was curious if there were any benefits (ie. bandwidth utilisation, delay, CPU time, memory, etc) to be gained by using bandwidth on demand without ppp multilink. Adam > - Original Message - > From: "Santosh Koshy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:46 PM > Subject: Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD > > > > The dialer load-threshold feature, works in combination with ppp > > multilink... > > What "dialer load-threshold" does is, define the load level that must be > > exceeded on the first ISDN B channel before the router attempts to bring > up > > a second B channel for a multilink PPP connection. > > > > ""Adam Burgess"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 011001c093dd$116e7140$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:011001c093dd$116e7140$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > To all DDR gurus: > > > > > > Are there any benefits in using the Cisco Proprietary = > > > Bandwidth-on-Demand feature (ie. dialer load-threshold), rather than = > > > using ppp multilink (other than the fact the ppp multilink is standard)? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adam Burgess > > > Brisbane, Australia > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD
Correct - although you don't need to specify 'dialer load-threshold' in order to bring up multiple channels, as if it is specified without ppp multilink, it enables bandwidth on demand and seems to provide the same throughput as ppp multilink. If you specify dialer load-threshold AND ppp multilink, then the interfacses switches to 'industry standard' ppp multilink. I was curious if there were any benefits (ie. bandwidth utilisation, delay, CPU time, memory, etc) to be gained by using bandwidth on demand without ppp multilink. Adam - Original Message - From: "Santosh Koshy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: Re: PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD > The dialer load-threshold feature, works in combination with ppp > multilink... > What "dialer load-threshold" does is, define the load level that must be > exceeded on the first ISDN B channel before the router attempts to bring up > a second B channel for a multilink PPP connection. > > ""Adam Burgess"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 011001c093dd$116e7140$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:011001c093dd$116e7140$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > To all DDR gurus: > > > > Are there any benefits in using the Cisco Proprietary = > > Bandwidth-on-Demand feature (ie. dialer load-threshold), rather than = > > using ppp multilink (other than the fact the ppp multilink is standard)? > > > > Regards > > > > Adam Burgess > > Brisbane, Australia > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP Multilink or Cisco BoD
To all DDR gurus: Are there any benefits in using the Cisco Proprietary = Bandwidth-on-Demand feature (ie. dialer load-threshold), rather than = using ppp multilink (other than the fact the ppp multilink is standard)? Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Netflow
Daley, VLAN/MLS configuration example (using IP/IPX in VLAN 1 and IP only in VLAN 2): Router Configuration mls rp ip interface FastEthernet0/0 speed 100 full-duplex mls rp vtp-domain MyVTP mls rp ip interface FastEthernet0/0.1 encapsulation isl 1 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 mls rp management-interface mls rp ip interface FastEthernet0/0.2 encapsulation isl 2 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 mls rp ip Switch Config (Cat 55xx + NFFC) set vtp domain MyVTP set vlan 1 name default type ethernet mtu 1500 said 11 state active set vlan 2 name MySpecialLAN type ethernet mtu 1500 said 18 state active set interface sc0 1 192.168.0.2/255.255.255.0 172.168.0.255 set mls enable ipx set mls flow full set mls agingtime 512 set mls agingtime fast 32 0 set mls include 192.168.0.1 Cheers Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Okuwa, Daley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:40 PM Subject: Cisco Netflow > hi all , > > Is there anyone who has used Cisco Netflow for collection of data > how can you enable cisco netflow on a cisco catalyst 5505 with supervisor > engine II G using a NFFC (Netflow Feature Card) > > Daley Okuwa > EDS Network services > Stockley Park > Tel no0181-5353144 > fax no 0181-7545983 > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exam Number: 640-503
Mike, I would recommend 'CCNP 2.0 Routing' from Robert Myhre. It covers all the material well and has very few errors. Regards Adam - Original Message - From: "Mike Bowlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:54 AM Subject: Exam Number: 640-503 > Can anyone recommend a couple of good book for the Routing exam 640-503? > > Thanks, > Mike > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: very confused with access-list, pls help!!
Chee Tong, > 1)I am very confused with access-list now, I have named my access-list as > below > > But I found when apply multiple access group in the int E0, > like below > Router(config-if)#ip access-group a3000 in > Router(config-if)#ip access-group range in > Router(config-if)#ip access-group telnet in > > but when I Router#sh run only ip access-group telnet in shown in the config > (the last one), where are the a3000, range ?? Only one access list may be applied per interface, per direction, at any given time. If you want all these access-list statements to work together, then you will need to put them into a single access list, ie: ip access-list extended MyGroovyStuff contents of a3000 ... contents of range ... contents of telnet ... Then apply the new list to your interface, ie: interface ethernet 0 ip access-group MyGroovyStuff in > 2)When I type sh access-list, why it shows me that access-group "range" is > still applied as shown below. Besides, why the line > permit tcp host 199.105.182.190 eq 8194 host 192.168.3.112 eq 8201 (17 > matches) and etc appear in the Extended IP access list telnet and I thought > it should show in the Extended IP access list range > I would guess that any matches on the 'a3000' and 'range' access lists (providing that you are applying them to your interface in the order you listed above) are as a result of 'hits' on the access list while you are making the change, eg: > Router(config-if)#ip access-group a3000 in When you type this command and press enter, it is applied to your interface. Stats will be logged for this list from now until when you type the next line and press enter (say 10 seconds). > Router(config-if)#ip access-group range in Same behavious as above, but now the 'range' access list has been applied and the 'a3000' list removed. > Router(config-if)#ip access-group telnet in Now your final access list 'telnet' is applied (and neither 'a3000' or 'range' are applied to the interface. I am also assuming that you have entered the 'ip access-group ...' commands a number of times in your effort to fix it and each time traffic that matches the list (even though that list may only be active for a very short while), a 'match' is recorded. > 3)In my config file, there are entry like "no ip route-cache" as shown > below, may I know how to delete it? Enter the command 'route-cache' (ie. the opposite of no route-cache), eg: router(config)#interface ethernet 0 router(config-if)#route-cache > 4)when I do a on router > SIN01>sh ip route connected > C 58.199.164.0/22 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 > C 58.199.126.0/27 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 > > Why two networks can state directly connected to one interface, what does it > mean?? You may have two IP addresses configured for the interface. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Netflow
Daley, I have implemented NFFC (although only with SupIII cards - but I assume it all works the same) in the past, and configured them for data collection. Did you have a specific question about the NFFC? Adam - Original Message - From: "Okuwa, Daley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 12:12 AM Subject: Cisco Netflow > hi all , > > Is there anyone who has used Cisco Netflow for collection of data > how can you enable cisco netflow on a cisco catalyst 5505 with supervisor > engine II G using a NFFC (Netflow Feature Card) > > Daley Okuwa > EDS Network services > Stockley Park > Tel no0181-5353144 > fax no 0181-7545983 > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for Cisco 4000/4500 in Australia
I am looking for a Second-Hand Cisco 4000 or 4500 in Australia or NZ if = possible. Unit must be working but I am not concerned with what modules are = installed, how much RAM it has, or what IOS is installed. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radius server - which one should I use ?
Have you tried Internet Authentication Services that ships with Windows 2000? I have a couple of client sites running it with Cisco dial-in gear and no complaints so far. Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Schimek, Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 7:38 PM Subject: Radius server - which one should I use ? > Hi ! > > > can anyone recommend a windows-based radius server - > respectively can anyone send it to me - for test resons > > > thx > hans > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3640 PPP Authentication Issue
I have a 3640 with IP Plus 56 12.0(7)T. =20 The box connects to 3 different LANs using Ethernet. It has a 10 = channel PRI running 4 data and 6 voice channels, with aaa configured but = no external authentication is set (or needed), so all authentication is = based on local accounts. I would like to connect to another site with serial (2048Kbps unframed = data via G.703 convertor into X.21 interface), but this new link MUST = use PPP encapsulation, and the other end does not (or the admin will = not) support PPP authentication. The problem is that whenever I try to connect the serial line to the = router, aaa jumps in and decides that it needs to authenticate with the = remote end. I can't remove AAA as it will cause problems with the = existing data services running through this router. I am looking at the following possible configuration to my problem: aaa authentication NOAUTH none aaa authorization network NOAUTH none interface serial 2/0 encapsulation ppp ppp authentication chap pap NOAUTH ppp authorization NOAUTH Each time I try to bring the service over to this router it causes about = 10-15 minutes downtime (as the connection is currently running via = another router) and I would like to minimise that if possible. Any ideas ? Does anyone know if this will/will not work ? Thanks in advance. Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DR Election
Any network that can only has 2 OSPF routers (ie. Point-to-Point Serial) does not need to be involved in a DR/BDR election. Any other type of network (even and Ethernet network that only has two OSPF routers) is a 'Multiaccess segment'. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "pinoal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:57 PM Subject: DR Election > > > Hi , > > From the OSPF Design Guide - Sam Halabi > > ' DR and BDR concepts are per multiaccess segment ' > > My question is what type of segments are considered as "multiaccess > segment" ? > > Ethernet , FR with Point-to-Multipoint with broadcast option enabled , any > others?? > > What does he mean by 'per multiaccess segment ' ? > > thanks > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AUX port connects to Console???
> I have four 25xx routers... but I don't have a terminal server = Using your example, you will need to connect the AUX port on R1 to the = CON port on R2, etc, etc. =20 Standard Cisco Roll-Over cable is needed. Config on the R1 should work with: line aux 0 access-class 1 in no exec exec-timeout 0 0 transport input all stopbits 1 flowcontrol hardware You will probably also need to: clear line aux 0 on the control router (or do a restart) before the config will work. You will then be able to telnet to R1 on TCP 2001 to gain console access = to R2. I do this on a 2509 so my AUX port is actually TCP 2009 as 2001-2008 are = used by Async Ports. Likewise on a 2511, AUX would be TCP 2017 as = 2001-2016 are used by Async Ports. Good Luck. Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
