Console port on 6509 [7:65293]
Good Morning, I was hoping someone could help me out. I have a single SUP module in my 6509 test chassis. When I power up the chassis with my terminal emulator connected to the console port I can see the image decompressing, and receive the message that the module is being tested, with successful results. I then see my MOTD banner and a request for a password. I also receive message that both the SUP blade and the MSFC blade are on line. Herein lies the problem; the port will not accept any input from my keyboard. I have moved the console connection to another SUP module in another chassis and it works like it should. I have altered the baud rate on my terminal, with no success. I have switch cables for this console, as well as changing the console port mode (via the button on the front of the module) with no success. Has anyone seen this issue before? Can it be fixed or will I need to setup an RMA with Cisco? Thanks. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65293t=65293 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VIP4-80 help [7:9397]
I am using 12.1.6 IOS. I actually have 2 VIP4-80s in the box, one is working fine, the other one is causing me the problem. I appreciate all the input I have received, but I am starting to wonder if this is a hardware problem, or if I can just reload the pertinent information. Thanks. Steve -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:19 PM To: Donohue, Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VIP4-80 help [7:9397] What IOS release are you running? We implemented two of these, one each in a 7513 and a 7505 to be able to use OC12 PA. The search for an IOS that would run everything is still not over. It seems that there is a bug with the Vip4-80 and OC12 PA. Tac is working on it. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Donohue, Steve To: Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 2:25 PM Subject: VIP4-80 help [7:9397] Hey Gang, I am wondering if anyone out there has had any problem with the VIP4-80s for 7500 router. I currently am unable to get the VIP recognized by the router. When I look at the diagbus for that slot I receive the following information. Slot 5: Physical slot 5, ~physical slot 0xA, logical slot 5, CBus 0 Internal Instruction Error, Microcode Status 0x0 Master Enable, LED, WCS DBUS Cmd Enable, WCS Loading, WCS Loaded Board is disabled Pending I/O Status: None EEPROM format version 1 VIP4-80 RM7000 controller, HW rev 2.01, board revision A0 Serial number: 18547357 Part number: 73-3143-03 Test history: 0x00RMA number: 00-00-00 Flags: cisco 7000 board; 7500 compatible EEPROM contents (hex): 0x20: 01 22 02 01 01 1B 02 9D 49 0C 47 03 00 00 00 00 0x30: 50 05 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Slot database information: Flags: 0x201Insertion time: 0x8AE0 (00:18:14 ago) VIP Controller Memory Size: Unknown How do I get this VIP to be analyized, enabled, memory recognized, and the Microcode status to 0X4? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9507t=9397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIP4-80 help [7:9397]
Hey Gang, I am wondering if anyone out there has had any problem with the VIP4-80s for 7500 router. I currently am unable to get the VIP recognized by the router. When I look at the diagbus for that slot I receive the following information. Slot 5: Physical slot 5, ~physical slot 0xA, logical slot 5, CBus 0 Internal Instruction Error, Microcode Status 0x0 Master Enable, LED, WCS DBUS Cmd Enable, WCS Loading, WCS Loaded Board is disabled Pending I/O Status: None EEPROM format version 1 VIP4-80 RM7000 controller, HW rev 2.01, board revision A0 Serial number: 18547357 Part number: 73-3143-03 Test history: 0x00RMA number: 00-00-00 Flags: cisco 7000 board; 7500 compatible EEPROM contents (hex): 0x20: 01 22 02 01 01 1B 02 9D 49 0C 47 03 00 00 00 00 0x30: 50 05 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Slot database information: Flags: 0x201Insertion time: 0x8AE0 (00:18:14 ago) VIP Controller Memory Size: Unknown How do I get this VIP to be analyized, enabled, memory recognized, and the Microcode status to 0X4? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9397t=9397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CiscoWork 2000 missing IP info [7:55]
Morning all, I am currently working on CiscoWorks 2000 and having a problem obtaining the IP address information for devices connected to my 2948s. I have been doing some reading and found that I am supposed to install UTlite.exe on the PDC to obtain user names, but do I need this executable to obtain the IP information of my PCs? I get the MAC address info fine but not the IP info. I am using User Tracking, Version 3.0. Any help would be appreciated. I search the archives and was unable to find any reference to this problem. Thanks in advance. Steve D. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55t=55 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DS3 -- no channelized
Good Afternoon Group, I was wondering if someone could give me a hand. I am trying to a configure T3 controller on a 7507 using the no channelized command. The router will not accept it. I am running IOS 12.0(5)T1. I want to open the pipe to full bandwidth without configuring the T1 interfaces. Any help/links you have to offer I would appreciate. Thanks. Steve D. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not receiving ICMP messages
Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it andreturn an ICMP messageback to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. SteveD.
Not receiving ICMP messages
Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it andreturn an ICMP messageback to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. SteveD.
RE: Not receiving ICMP messages
Thanks for your replies. A traceroute will traverse the entire path. As for the MTU of 1476, I believe it is because of the overhead added by the encryption. Attempts have been made to increase the MTU size on the link, but to this point they have been unsuccessful. When an ftp is attempted from a UNIX box, which is trying to send with an MTU of 1500, the process fails. When that same file is ftp-d from a Win95 machine ( which uses a smaller MTU ) it works fine. This is why I am pointing to the MTU issue, and lack of ICMP messages, as possible problems. Steve D. -Original Message- From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 5:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Not receiving ICMP messages Hi Steve, Is the MTU size of 1476 a limitation of the encryption, or merely because of the overheads added by the encryption knocking it down from 1500. Is it a possibility to increase the MTU size on the link? Gaz "Phil Barker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Steve, Without CLI access your going to struggle. Q : How far does the traceroute get, from the send node ? try rfc 792 ICMP http://www.landfield.com/rfcs/rfc792.html SNIP from RFC 792 If a host reassembling a fragmented datagram cannot complete the reassembly due to missing fragments within its time limit it discards the datagram, and it may send a time exceeded message. If fragment zero is not available then no time exceeded need be sent at all. Good luck, Phil. --- "Donohue, Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it and return an ICMP message back to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. Steve D. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not receiving ICMP messages
I found this link as well that is why I am wondering about the lack of ICMP messages. I realize that when you enable HSRP on an interface it disables ICMP redirects. Would the ICMP messages requesting a smaller MTU size fall under this category? Thanks again all. Steve -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 7:22 AM To: Gareth Hinton; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Not receiving ICMP messages Gareth, This is a better link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/56.html HTH, Phil. --- Gareth Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Steve, Is the MTU size of 1476 a limitation of the encryption, or merely because of the overheads added by the encryption knocking it down from 1500. Is it a possibility to increase the MTU size on the link? Gaz "Phil Barker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Steve, Without CLI access your going to struggle. Q : How far does the traceroute get, from the send node ? try rfc 792 ICMP http://www.landfield.com/rfcs/rfc792.html SNIP from RFC 792 If a host reassembling a fragmented datagram cannot complete the reassembly due to missing fragments within its time limit it discards the datagram, and it may send a time exceeded message. If fragment zero is not available then no time exceeded need be sent at all. Good luck, Phil. --- "Donohue, Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it and return an ICMP message back to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. Steve D. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dial-in user assigned duplicate IP addresses
Good morning gang, I am currently using a 3640 to allow remote users to dial-in to our LAN. They are receiving their IP address information from a DHCP server, as opposed to an IP pool on the router. This appears to work fine for about a week at a time, then users start to receive duplicate addresses. The 3640 is running 12.1(3a). The Mica modems' portware is version 2.5.1. Has anyone out there seen this type of behavior before? Can anyone point me in the direction of a resolution? Any help/comments would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Steve Donohue
RE: Dial-in Users are not getting logon script
They are getting authenticated to NT. This setup has been in place for a couple of months, but seems to have stopped in the past week. I can't pinpoint the exact time it started but, at one point it was working as planned. -Original Message- From: Frank Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dial-in Users are not getting logon script Are they getting authenticated to NT or Netware? Were the scripts once working and now they are intermittent or is this a new setup? From: "Donohue, Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Donohue, Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dial-in Users are not getting logon script Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:54:49 -0400 Morning, A quick description of my scenario. Dial-in users access network resources via a 3640, and are authenticated via Cisco Secure 2.4. The situation is that sometimes they run their logon scripts, and sometimes they don't. I was wondering if anyone has seen such a scenario, or might have any ideas as to where to continue my trouble-shooting. All user are getting authenticated, and allowed access. All users are able to run the logon script manually. Any help anyone can offer would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Steve D. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dial-in Users are not getting logon script
Morning, A quick description of my scenario. Dial-in users access network resources via a 3640, and are authenticated via Cisco Secure 2.4. The situation is that sometimes they run their logon scripts, and sometimes they don't. I was wondering if anyone has seen such a scenario, or might have any ideas as to where to continue my trouble-shooting. All user are getting authenticated, and allowed access. All users are able to run the logon script manually. Any help anyone can offer would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Steve D. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cat 6509 IOS change
In my current environment we have just installed a 6509 with dual supervisor modules. It is currently running a "hybrid" IOS (12.0(7)XE) which allows the switch engine and the route processor to be configured, as separate entities. With this IOS the configuration of the two modules does not sync. The customer want the configs to sync as opposed to running HSRP on the two route processors. In order to do this I must migrate to a "native" IOS (12.0(7)XE1 for example) which makes the switch engine and the route processor configuration occur at a single prompt.. This IOS migration will result in the current configuration of the Catalyst being wiped out. Since this switch is live on the network I am trying to minimize downtime. My questions to the group are; Has anyone done such an IOS migration? Is it be possible to re-boot the "secondary" module, load the new IOS via the xmodem rommon command, configure that module, fail over to the newly configured module, then perform the same function on the "master" module, the whole time maintaining network functionality until the fail overs? Any and all suggestion that would minimize down time would be appreciated. I currently do not have a second catalyst to perform the upgrade outside the "live box." Thanks in advance for any and all ideas. Steve D. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you assign a subnet mask while using Cisco Secure
I am using Cisco Secure to authenticate dial-in users. I would like to be able to assign these users IP addresses from their respective VLANs. I have set up IP address pools in my Cisco Secure. Cisco Secure applies a classful subnet mask so I can't make them appear to be on various vlans. Is it possible to change this configuration, if not what would be the best way to handle such a situation? I appreciate your assistence in this matter. Steve ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
