CCNP foundation test 640-509 [7:24132]
Does any one know how many questions are on the foundations test. I have looked on the cisco site but have had no luck. Thanks in advance G30RG3 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24132t=24132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP Sec on CCIE RS LAB?? [7:24122]
That quote would help if we knew the IOS feature set they used in the lab. Do they use the ipsec ios feature set on the lab routers. Without breaking the NDA do you recall what IOS set they used. If they dont use the ipsec ios then it really cant be configured on a router so it would not be on the lab test. Just my 2 cents G30RG3 Louie Belt wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Here is a quote directly from Cisco website about the CCIE RS Lab: The Routing and Switching Lab exam tests any feature that can be configured on the equipment in the Equipment List After reading that quote you should have your answer. Louie A Belt CCIE #7054 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IP Sec on CCIE RS LAB?? [7:24122] I have heard that they have some IP Security on the CCIE Routing and Switching Lab. Does anyone know if this is true or not? It dosen't show it listed on the Cisco web site, but I'd like to know for sure. Thanks. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24134t=24122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mulilayer Switch (MLS) on CAT 4006 [7:24142]
You can do it with an external router if you have an 10/100 blade that supports isl or dot1q trunking. or you gan get an rsm I believe or an nffc. G30RG3 Thomas wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, I wonder if CAT 4006 switch support MLS? It doesn't seem to have a layer 3 card. I wonder if I can enable MLS using an external router, or pointing it to the MSFCs of a CAT 6500 that have MLS enabled? Thanks! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24147t=24142 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it possible to configure an ethernet interface to obtain [7:10947]
if you have ios version 12.1 or newer then issue the following command config terminal interface ethernet 0 ip address dhcp its that easy George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems KM Reynolds wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello Everyone, I have an 1605 with two ethernet interfaces. Is it possible to configure one of the ethernet interface's so that it connects to the ISP's cable modem, and is able to obtain an IP address via the ISP's DHCP server. I currently have licences for 3 PCs, that obtain an IP when connecting to the ISP via cable. However, I would like to set up a LAN with more devices that do not need Internet access. So I would like to IP the 3 PCs with a private address, and when connecting to the Internet I would like to use the 1605 to NAT and provide the gateway to the Internet. Looking at the archives, I saw a mention about Easy IP, but I don't think this will do the job. Any suggestion would be greatly appriciated, and if anyone knows of another product (I would prefer Cisco) that will allow me to connect in this manner. Thanks so much KM _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10947t=10947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to goup for knowledge [7:10702]
Just passed my BSCN yesterday and wanted to say that reading over the questions and replys has helped me gain that extra knowledge needed to pass the test. As for what questions i got on the test, Without breaking the NDA, I studied hard on the following subects (hint hint) BGP, Policy based routing, OSPF, EIGRP, classful protocols, VLSM, and route summarization and it helped me get a 893. Most of the questions were very well written I was very pleased with the test all around. I'm off to the bcran test in a couple of weeks. Thanks George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10702t=10702 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN troubles [7:10714]
The reason you cant ping from the router itself is that when you specified what traffic to encrypt and send to the tunnel you only specified the subnets behind the firewall and router. If you try and ping the other side it will not go through the tunnel because it is not a match on the access-list. That is one of the reasons. I cant say that is the only reason cuz I don't know what your configs look like. Hope that helps George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Allen May wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have an IPSec tunnel set up between PIX and a 2600 and it works perfectly for clients end-to-end. However, I can't ping across the VPN from pix or router. I suspect a routing issue. When I try to add a route to tell it anything going to the other end should use that IP on that interface, it gives an error saying invalid hop because it's on that router. Any ideas? A little info: Remote network has 10.43.2.0/24 but gateway is a secondary IP on the internal FastEthernet interface of a 2600. Central network is 10.43.1.0/24 on a PIX 515. Future networks will be on the 10.x.y.z network centralize to the PIX rack. The problem I'm trying to solve is making the remote routers authenticate over the VPN to TACACS+ for the enable password. If I can't ping the box because it's trying to bo out the default route, it won't work. Allen Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10731t=10714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Diablo II [7:10716]
If no one knowsthe answer, Try sniffing your packets on that segment you can probably find out. George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Steve Roman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone know what ports Diablo II uses. Need to block it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10732t=10716 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does anyone know if this effects PIX or VPN boxes [7:10664]
If you read that article it gives the idea that this could stop the internet from working. Let me just say that if there is an ISP or Tier 1 provider out there that has http enabled on there router, then they should get hacked and brought down for being stupid. They make it seem that you need http enabled on your routers to work when in reality no one probably even uses it in a production environment. This is the equivalent of an NT administrator installing a server and leaving the guest account active with no password. Yes it would get hacked and bring down the whole network but in the real world who really does that. Just my 2 cents George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Plantier, Spencer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone know if this effects PIX or VPN boxes? Thanks http://www.msnbc.com/news/594305.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10733t=10664 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: let's talk about BGP! [7:10297]
If you are in a hub and spoke environment and your hub is your as border router that is getting external routes then by default it will forward all external routes to its internal BGP neighbor routers. The purpose of route reflectors is to have internal BGP routers that do not have a interior neighbor relationship with the border router get those external routes from a route reflector. if you want to try this do it this way. leave your setup like it is and add another internal router and run bgp. have it only build a neighbor relationship with a spoke router. then on that spoke router add the route reflector statements to it. also your spoke routers are advertising the same networks that your hub router is advertising. I got the impression that you wanted these to be running ibgp not connecting to an ebgp router. Hope this helps. George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems CiscoG wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello fellow successful Engineer's; For all you BGP gurus, I have a situation here. Currently preparing for my BSCN exam, I have a lab at home that I recently implemented BGP on. With only 3 routers, it worked fantastic! Then I decided that wasn't good enough and now I wanted to setup a Route Reflector. In a Hub and Spoke topology, I chose to make the Hub router the Router reflector and have the two spoke routers clients. Performing a show ip bgp neighbor on each router, displays the correct information and verifies connection is established. The problem is, not one router is learning any BGP routes! I will post my basic BGP configuration below just to verify that is correct. Any ideas on this challenge would be appreciated! Thank you! -C (Hub Router) router bgp 100 network 172.16.0.0 network 172.20.0.0 network 10.0.0.0 neighbor 172.16.0.2 remote-as 100 neighbor 172.16.0.2 route-reflector-client neighbor 172.20.0.2 remote-as 100 neighbor 172.20.0.2 route-reflector-client (spoke router 1) router bgp 100 network 10.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 172.20.0.0 neighbor 172.16.0.1 remote-as 100 (spoke router 2) router bgp 100 network 10.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 172.20.0.0 neighbor 172.20.0.1 remote-as 100 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10470t=10297 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1600 router configuration [7:10290]
You need an isdn simulator George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Sytems Andrew Lawrence wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm in desperate need of information on how to connect 2 1600 routers together over isdn. The networks either side will be different IP addresses. Do I need to setup both to dial the other ? Any links to resources would be useful, an example config would be better ! I am looking on cisco's site but time is of the essence ! TIA Andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10471t=10290 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Locking down telnet on switch [7:10283]
Use access class lists on the VTY terminals and that should work. George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Steve Smith wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hey gang is there any way to lock down telnet to a specific node on a network like you can a router or switch? I have a 4006 w/L3 card. I can access-list the layer 3 card but what about normal telnet to the switch? thanks in advance, Steve Steve Smith MCSE, CCNA Data Networks Technical Manager Freeliant.com 901-309-3919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value. -Albert Einstein Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10472t=10283 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: back-to-back [7:10469]
For the 56k csu/dsu you can use a rollover cable(console cable). Make sure that one router is getting clocking from line and one from internal. Good Luck George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Michelle Sanderson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm trying to get two 1602's and a couple of 2500's (2524/2501) setup into some kind of lab. I can't get the 1602's to see each other on the built-in 56k modules. I've tried service-module settings for clock source line/internal, speed, network-type, but nothing works. I made a cable with pins 1,2 to 4,5 and that works for the T1 modules that I have in the 1602's and 2524, but not on the built in 56k (in the 1602's). What am I doing wrong? Please tell me how I should make my cable or correct config, or point me to where it is on the CD. Thanks for any help, Dave - Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10474t=10469 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019]
Make sure you input the command terminal monitor so it will display the output to the VTY session you are logged in on. otherwise it will only show it to the console session. Good Luck George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems cisco guru wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I am trying to see the debug output on my routers via telnet sessions but am not having any luck. I first got the debug ip packet command to work but then it stopped working. No other debug commands will work. Eg. debug ip igrp trans I have the service timestamps commands issued along with the term mon command on the router running the telnet session. The ios ver. on this particular router is 11.0 (10c). Does the ios ver. make a difference or does something in particular have to be done on both routers? Please advise. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9245t=9019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing the Flash mode [7:8657]
Daniel Maybe I am just misunderstanding your answer but you can alter the flash when the router is booted up normally. If you type the command copy tftp flash and go through the prompts it will ask you if you want to erase the flash and put the new one in. By erasing the flash and writing the new one in there it is in essence altering the flash. I have done this many times on a 2501 router. Am i mistaken as to what happens when you do a copy tftp flash? Please advise. George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Daniel Cotts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'll assume that you are referring to a 2500 series router. Keep in mind that a 2500 runs from Flash. You can't alter the Flash while it is in use. Change the configuration register to 0x2101 and reload. It will then boot from ROM as router(boot). The Flash will then be R/W. Check on CCO for instructions on updating IOS for a more full explanation. -Original Message- From: friend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Changing the Flash mode [7:8657] Hello, Does any one know how to change the Flash from Read-only mode to R/W mode ? Thanks Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8667t=8657 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ideas on integrating VLAN and DHCP? [7:8651]
What are you using for inter V-lan routing? On your router use the ip helper command. Hope this helps George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Rich Chang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone have any ideas on how to integrate DHCP with VLAN. For instance if I have three switches, each switch supporting four VLANs 10, 20,30 and 40,on ports 2/1, 2/2, 2/3 and 2/4 respectively, how can i make sure the proper DHCP broadcast/traffic is sent to each port? Is there a Cisco whitepaper supporting this topic and showing one how yto set this up? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8668t=8651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: back to back 2500's acting as a firewall [7:8251]
you can use acccess control lists as a starting point, but it would ultimately depend on what ios you have. if you have the ip/fw ios you can be more granular as to what to let out and in. Hope this helps George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Eric Waguespack wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have 2 x 2501 routers, each with 1 ethernet, and 2 serial. I was wondering how I would go about useing the routers back to back to create a firewall for my cable modem network @home---e0(router)s0---s0(router)e0---(switch)---(pc) possible issues: -use nat? -ip unnumbered on serial interfaces? the reason I cant just use one router, is that i have only one ethernet per router. also, i realize that this is goofy, and that a software firewall would be easier, I am also trying to get familiar with the ios firewall feature set. __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8253t=8251 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPSEC (ESP) over NAT ? [7:8150]
I am currently doing this with a client but i am using the IOS based vpn Client (cisco secure vpn client) and my tunnel is terminating on a 3640 with ios ipsec 56. I am using preshared keys. md5 hash and des. on the remote side I am using nat overload and it does work. I can't attest it will work with the VPN concentrator client but I dont see why not. Hope this helps George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Uniplace - Alexander Krastelev wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Does anyone know if Cisco IOS (any version) supports IPSEC passthrough over NAT ? I need to make the following configuration running: [Server]---[VPN gateway]--internet-[Cisco1600,NAT][Client] - Client (a PC with IPSEC VPN client) should have access to Server over IPSEC VPN - Cisco 1600 makes NAT with overload - IPSEC protocol is IPSEC ESP (not AH) I have two options: -to do something with Cisco to let it pass IPSEC traffic; -to switch VPN in UDP-encapsulated mode (IPSEC-over-UDP), which works over the most dumb NAT (we have to pay for upgrade, however). So my question is, does Cisco suppport IPSEC passthrough ? Alexander Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8259t=8150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
Priscilla, The only reading I have done on the LLC2 standard is from a book written by Roosevelt Giles. From reading the book I got the impression that LLC was a subset of HDLC and it was based on HDLC standard not the other way around. I would have to respectfully disagree with the statement that hdlc and lapd are based on LLC2. But I wouldn't put my career on it. I would also mention the reliability factor is because it is an acknowledged connection-oriented service versus LLC type 1 is connectionless. Is this part of the Top down network design volume 2 edition. If it is please let us know the due date cuz its gonna sellout fast. Hope this helps George, Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I found myself writing this paragraph for a new writing project: When NetBEUI and SNA are used on Ethernet networks, they take advantage of the reliability of LLC Type 2. Because NetBEUI and SNA are legacy protocols, the use of LLC Type 2 is diminishing. However, it is still important to learn LLC Type 2 because WAN protocols, such as High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) and Link Access Procedure on the D Channel (LAPD), also known as ITU-T Q.921, are based on LLC Type 2. (Cisco's HDLC is non-standard and is not based on LLC Type 2, however. Cisco's HDLC is connectionless.) Do I have it backwards? Are HDLC and LAPD based on LLC2, or is it the other way around? Any other lies you can pinpoint in my paragraph? I know it's a bit awkward still. I will polish it. ;-) Thanks for your help! Priscilla Thanks for your help! Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8283t=8262 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How do identify Boot ROM FW1 FW2 [7:7807]
One should say fw1 and the other should say fw2. It is also printed on the circuit board of your 2500. At least on mine it is. if you got 2 fw1 then they sent you two of the same. George Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Tim Rutherford wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I just received the latest boot rom's for my 2511. The two chips are labeled as follows: C002349 08-0197-02 FW1 11.0 10c xB2 1B7326A1 C000449 08-0197-02 FW1 11.0 10c xB2 14B570A3 Which one goes in socket FW1 and which one goes in FW2? Any ideas. I don't have a TAC contract or I would call them. Thanks, Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7816t=7807 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help on getting an Teltone ISDN Simulator [7:7362]
Instead of practicing isdn with a simulator, You can do exactly the same labs using your async communications (aux Port) No you cant setup spids but you can do DDR dialer profiles, ppp auth, and even multilink with two phone lines. and you probably wont spend more than $150 dollars. Everything else about isdn you can learn from a book. Hope this helps. George Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Alfred Chin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have search the web for an Teltone ISDN simulator, the price for an Teltone ISDN Demonstrator is around $1800. Anyone know where I can find the ISDN simulator with a lower price? I'm building my lab with a budget. Hope to lower the cost as much as possible. Thanks. Alfred Chin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7370t=7362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO VPN Solution [7:7281]
Jason It depends on yoour clients need and budget. you can do Cisco IOS based VPN if they have an existing router and use secure remote client to access the network. That is probably going to be your least expensive route. You can also go with a concentrator like vpn 3000 it is strictly for VPNs and is easier to configure. It just depends on the customers need and budget. George Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems suaveguru wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am basically doing it for telecommuters regards, Jason Yee --- Georgescu, Aurelian wrote: Cisco 3000 series are good. Depending on the budget you can do VPN for telecommuters or LAN-to-LAN connections for small branches or both. -Original Message- From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CISCO VPN Solution [7:7281] hi alll anyone can propose to me a good solution for VPN , I am intending to propose a solution that involves VPN solutions regards, suaveguru __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7291t=7281 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2611 dial out [7:7278]
brandon You have to use DDR and dialer profiles and specify interesting traffic. Here is a good link to get you started with some sample configs. Hope this helps. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/index.shtml#ddr http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/async_backup_dp.html Good Luck. George Head Janitor, CCNA CCDA Cisco Systems Brandon Peyton wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, I currently have a 2611 with a 3COM modem connected to the AUX port. The below is my configuration, I suppose what I need is a way to have the router tell the modem to dial the details in my async interface. I'm not exactly sure what I've done wrong but somethings not right :) Could someone enlighten me on the best way to have my router dial out and establish a ppp connection via authentication as well. I have been unable to find sufficent information on the TAC pages of CISCO hopefully someone can help. Thanks Brandon username X password 0 X ! interface Async65 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp ip tcp header-compression passive no ip mroute-cache dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 200 dialer enable-timeout 10 dialer string 82109001 autodetect encapsulation ppp async mode dedicated compress mppc no cdp enable ppp authentication chap callin ! line aux 0 password X autoselect arap autoselect during-login autoselect ppp login modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport preferred none transport input all stopbits 1 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware 1w5d: TTY65: Modem type is default 1w5d: TTY65: Modem command: --ATFC1D2S0=1H0-- 1w5d: TTY65: Modem configuration succeeded 1w5d: TTY65: Detected modem speed 115200 1w5d: TTY65: Done with modem configuration Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7293t=7278 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pinout for older cat1900 switch [7:7029]
Does anyone know the pinouts or the connectors/cables you would use on the older 1900 catalyst switch with the DB-9 connector as the console port. I have been to the cisco site and it seems I can use regular DB-9 connectors with a rollover cable but it doesnt work. Maybe there is a trick to them. Any help would be appreciated. TIA! George, Head Janitor, CCNA, CCDA Cisco Systems Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7029t=7029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test please ignore [7:6957]
test please ignore Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6957t=6957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
