PCMCIA Flash Card Access Problems

2001-02-13 Thread Roger Sohn

Hi,
 
I have Cisco 7206VXR router and the unit has 2 slots for PCMCIA Flash Cards.
The IOS I'm running is 12.0.  I have 3 cards of 16MB, 48MB, and another for
128MB.  
 
Here's the problem..
 
I can do everything with the 16MB card without any problems.  But when I try
to access the 48MB or the 128MB it gives me an error message of  "Open
device slot1 failed (Device not ready)".  
 
 
 
Why is it saying that when it's physically in there?  Is it because my IOS
won't allow it to read a card that holds that much memory?  It came out of
my friends 7200 without any problems and it worked for him but not me.  Any
help would be much appreciated.  
 
Thanks,
Roger
CCNA

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Fw: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones!

2001-02-15 Thread Roger Sohn

These phones are definitely cool!  How do I know?  Most employees, including
myself are currently using them.  =)

Very nice.

Roger Sohn
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Multiservice Switching Business Unit
225 E Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AlphaPager: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Lopez, Robert
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:54 AM
To: 'Erick B.'; Arthur Simplina; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Fw: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones!


Have you seen the IP SoftPhone, yet?  There's a demo on Cisco web site.  Go
to
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/largeent/avvid/solutions/collaboration.
html
and click on "See a Flash Demo of Cisco IP Phone"

-Original Message-
From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:42 AM
To: Arthur Simplina; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: Is this COOL or what? Cisco Space Phones!


So, wheres the URL or info on 'Cisco Space Phones' ?

--- Arthur Simplina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is COOL!!!
>
> >Received this today from my inside sales manager.
> >
> >Though you "might" consider blowing your own horn -
> it is still cool.
> >
> >Kevin Wigle


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Lab Set for CCIE

2001-02-19 Thread Roger Sohn

CCIE Lab

Cisco 2502 Router
Cisco 2503 Router 
Cisco 2504 Router 
Cisco 2509 Router 
Cisco 2511 Router 
Cisco 2513 Router 
Cisco 3640 Router with ATM module 
Cisco Catalyst 5000 Switch 
Cisco 7000 Routers 
Cisco Light Stream 1010 ATM Switch 
Ethernet Hubs 
Token Ring MAUs 
Ethernet Token Ring and Serial Patch Panel 
ISDN Line

-Original Message-
From: Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lab Set for CCIE


Hi All - I am planning on buying a set of router/switch to pratice for my
CCNP/CCIE.  Any suggestion of which router/switch should I buy so that I can
do either routing, switching (3rd layer switching) and remote access?
Thanks in advance!


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Boot Problems on a 7200

2001-02-20 Thread Roger Sohn

I've tried searching massively through CCO and can't seem to find the
solution to this problem.

I have a Cisco 7206VXR and everytime I try to boot it up, everything is
dandy...but it always comes to the prompt of "Router(boot)".  This is the
output when I run a "show version".  It says that the system is returned to
ROM by reload.  Is this tied in with the problem?  I currently have it set
to boot off the flash disk with the image of c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S.  Am I
missing something?

-Roger

---

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-BOOT-M), Version 12.0(10)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEA
SE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 24-Mar-00 15:54 by htseng
Image text-base: 0x60008900, data-base: 0x60684000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(19990210:195103) [12.0XE 105],
DEVELOPMENT S
OFTWARE

California uptime is 4 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "disk0:c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S"

cisco 7206VXR (NPE300) processor with 57344K/40960K bytes of memory.
R7000 CPU at 262Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 2.1, 256KB L2, 2048KB L3 Cache
6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.0

Last reset from power-on
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
3 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
8 Serial network interface(s)

Router(boot)#

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Boot Problems on a 7200

2001-02-20 Thread Roger Sohn

When I go to CCO to download an IOS image, how do I know which type is the
"full version" that I need to download?

Is it the Enterprise or IP image?  I tried to download and use the "Boot
Image" off of CCO, but when I boot off of it...The router gives me a "CPU ID
Error" when it tries to load that image on start.  How do I determine if
it's an RX boot image or a regular full version boot image?  

You are right though because that only image that I'm booting off of now is
merely 3 megs.  

Thanks for your help and sorry if I'm asking too many questions.  

I can't seem to find a help page or FAQ on this stuff.  

-Roger

-Original Message-
From: Tim O'Brien
To: Steve Smith; Roger Sohn; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/20/2001 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Boot Problems on a 7200

Your problem is the version/type of code that you are running. You will
need
to download the full version of IOS from CCO. The version that you have
is
an rxboot image. ROM uses this code to boot. I believe that if you can
go in
and look at the flash you will see that the image is only about 1.5 meg
where a full IOS image would be at least 5 megs or larger. You will
probably
have to use the TFTPDNLD command in ROM to upgrade to the new IOS code.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios112/112cg_cr
/1cb
ook/1csysim.htm#xtocid2402288

Hope that helps..

Tim



- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roger Sohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Boot Problems on a 7200


Is the following statement in your config? boot system flash
slot0:c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S.bin .I have seen that problem when the
statement is not in there.

regards,
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Roger Sohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Boot Problems on a 7200


I've tried searching massively through CCO and can't seem to find the
solution to this problem.

I have a Cisco 7206VXR and everytime I try to boot it up, everything is
dandy...but it always comes to the prompt of "Router(boot)".  This is
the
output when I run a "show version".  It says that the system is returned
to
ROM by reload.  Is this tied in with the problem?  I currently have it
set
to boot off the flash disk with the image of c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S.  Am
I
missing something?

-Roger

---

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-BOOT-M), Version 12.0(10)S, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT
RELEA
SE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 24-Mar-00 15:54 by htseng
Image text-base: 0x60008900, data-base: 0x60684000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(19990210:195103) [12.0XE 105],
DEVELOPMENT S
OFTWARE

California uptime is 4 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "disk0:c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S"

cisco 7206VXR (NPE300) processor with 57344K/40960K bytes of memory.
R7000 CPU at 262Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 2.1, 256KB L2, 2048KB L3
Cache
6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.0

Last reset from power-on
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
3 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
8 Serial network interface(s)

Router(boot)#

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: juniper and cisco

2001-02-26 Thread Roger Sohn

 Actually, that's not true anymore.  Cisco released their OC192 routers
about 3-4 weeks ago and it performs and scales better than Juniper's
routers.  

Juniper's equipment doesn't scale well and performance loss is experienced
under a full loaded node of interface cards.  Cisco's stuff doesn't do this
and because of their independent architecture and design, everything runs at
a carrier class level whether it has just one card or 8.  

Juniper was first to come out with the fastest backbone routers, but because
Cisco retains the carrier class reliability, performance, and
scalability...that's why it took them a bit longer.  I guess it's worth the
wait.  

-Original Message-
From: Dan West
To: Buri, Heather H; 'cslx'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 2/26/2001 8:06 AM
Subject: RE: juniper and cisco

For our company, Cisco does not yet provide reliable
products that scale to OC192 and beyond. Juniper
easily handles this for our backbone interfaces. I
don't work with it directly myself, but that's what
the higher-up engineers have told our group. :>

--- "Buri, Heather H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I understand from people who work with
> large scale providers,
> Juniper is stronger in the Backbone.  I believe
> Cisco is probably still the
> best for overall Enterprise products.
> 
> Heather Buri
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: cslx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: juniper and cisco
> 
> 
> it is said that the core technology of juniper is
> better than cisco now,it
> that true?
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
from The Big Lebowski...

The Dude: You sure he won't mind?
Bunny: Dieter doesn't care about anything. He's a nihilist.
The Dude: Ohhh, that must be exhausting...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: what is the average age of people in this stuff?

2001-02-26 Thread Roger Sohn

 I commend you on your attitude and experience accumlated.  My advice to you
is to continue to rock on.  I am 24 and I've been working in this field for
about 4 years now (I'm still working on a BS) as a Network Engineer with
CCNA and working towards my CCNP.  

What I learned from others is that if you really want something and want to
push yourself ahead and faster above others...continue to go after it
instead of waiting around for it to happen.  

I know for sure that it has paid off for meSpending the regular 8 hours
a day with your work and any overtime outside of that does go to my higher
learning and self-studies.  It's the only reason why I've moved up so fast
and have gone so far.  Do it now while you don't have a wife and kids to
worry about.  =)


-Original Message-
From: Dale Frohman
To: Mel Chandler PMI
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/26/2001 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: what is the average age of people in this stuff?

If they think you are young, they will probably think I am still a baby
being only 19.  I have my CCNA, 1/4 CCNP and actively seeking MCSE 2k.
I
also have an AA degree and also seeking my bachelor degree in computer
science.  I plan on getting my CCIE within the next few years.  I have
worked with an internet company for more than three years now.  I have
been told that I am impatient and immature, but I am not one to just sit
around.  If anyone can help me dispel some of these notions I would be
greatly thankful.  Also if someone veterans can give some pointers/tips
on
how to make it in this industry, that would also be helpful.  I hope all
this hard work pays off!

Dale


On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Mel Chandler PMI wrote:

> I'm 29 and all I ever hear about is how young I am (I guess youth is
> automatically associated with inexperience)  But I've been around.
I've
> done a four year tour in the Navy in the Advanced Electronics field as
a
> Sonar Technician on a Submarine.  I've worked for some fortune 500
companies
> like Airtouch, IBM, Boeing, AST, Bergen Brunswick.  I have some certs
to
> back me up, but no matter what I do, it just never seems to be
enough...  Oh
> well, maybe after I have a PhD and CCIE I'll get someone to listen to
me.
> 
> Mel L. Chandler, A+, Network+, MCNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Analyst
> Information Services
> PMI Delta Dental
> (562) 467-6627
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 9:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: what is the average age of people in this stuff?
> 
> 
> LOL!
> 
> I am 36, and have the same problem, thank Cisco that they put a ? in
the
> IOS.
> 
> Don't worry about it, most of the people I work (worked) with in the
network
> business are between 20-60 with the majority being in their 40's.
> 
> They say that memory is the first thing to go, I just wish would have
told
> my body that!
> 
> --
> John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I
> 
> 
> ""rtc"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm 40--am I getting too old for this stuff? Cant remember anything
worth
> a
> > damn,
> > especially the commands nd command syntax
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCNA Pass Mark

2001-03-19 Thread Roger Sohn

It's about anywhere from 65-70ish questions and you have about one hour and
a half to answer everything.  It's more than enough time.  I breezed through
the entire exam in 25-30 minutes.  You'll either know it, or you won't.
Passing mark for the 2.0 exam is 822.  It used to be 760 or something like
that for the CCNA 1.0.

-Roger
CCNA
- Original Message -
From: "Tuan Heng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:04 PM
Subject: CCNA Pass Mark


> Hi All,
>
> I have read 2 conflicting reports on the number of questions and passing =
> mark for CCNA 2.0, one from Examcram while another from Que.
>
> Could someone tell me the ACTUAL number of questions,time frame given =
> and passing mark?
>
> TIA
>
> Tan
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCNA Pass Mark

2001-03-22 Thread Roger Sohn

It doesn't matter what the passing mark is.  Just study for the exam and if
you know the stuff, you will pass it.  If you don't, then you will fail it.
Simple as that.

The test is about 65 questions and there may be more and there may be less.
Just figure that you have approximately that many questions and take the
test.  It's not that important.  If you know your stuff, you will have WAY
more than enough time to answer all the questions so concentrate on the
actual material on the test.  Not how many questions.

If you really need to know exactly how many questions there are, then go
waste $100 and flip through all the questions.  Sorry to be so harsh, but
this isn't rocket science here.
- Original Message -
From: "Tuan Heng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: CCNA Pass Mark


> So i can conclude that the passing mark is 849/1000 and the number of
> questions is 65.
>
> But some ppl say the time given is 75 as oppose to some that mention 90.
>
> So which is it guys?
>
> TIA
>
> Tuan
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brad Shifflett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 5:12 AM
> Subject: RE: CCNA Pass Mark
>
>
> > I can verify the same, 849 to pass, 65 questions, I believe the time is
90
> > minutes. Tough exam, but passed with a 881.
> >
> > Brad Shifflett
> > CCNA, MCSE, CNA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Micromenders, Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Kline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:52 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: CCNA Pass Mark
> >
> >
> > 849 to pass is correct. I took the test a little over a week ago and 849
> is
> > passing according to the Score Report that prints out.
> >
> > Dan Kline
> >
> > "Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > No anymore! It is 65 questions, 849 to pass.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Traceroute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 7:30 AM
> > > To: Tuan Heng; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: CCNA Pass Mark
> > >
> > > 65 questions, 822 to pass
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Tuan Heng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:04 AM
> > > Subject: CCNA Pass Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I have read 2 conflicting reports on the number of questions and
> passing
> > =
> > > > mark for CCNA 2.0, one from Examcram while another from Que.
> > > >
> > > > Could someone tell me the ACTUAL number of questions,time frame
given
> =
> > > > and passing mark?
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > >
> > > > Tan
> > > >
> > > > _
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Refurbished/used cisco equipment

2001-03-22 Thread Roger Sohn

Try Ebay auctions.  You will find most of everything that you may need and
pretty good prices.  Outside vendors who sell used equipment usually mark
stuff up pretty high.
- Original Message -
From: "bigmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:22 AM
Subject: Refurbished/used cisco equipment


>
> I am thinking of buying some used cisco equipment (cisco 2514, catalyst
> 1924 & 2924XL,...). Anybody knows the address of a site where they offer
> such hardware?
>
> Regards.
> MF
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE Exam Fee

2001-03-22 Thread Roger Sohn

Yes...Cisco is increasing the cost of the CCIE Lab Exam to $1250 effective
April 1st and the Written has already jumped to $300 since March 15.

Cisco employees don't get to take the Lab exam for free either anymore.  Now
we only get 2 free attempts and after attempt afterwards is $1250.



- Original Message -
From: "Mike McCline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Niraj Palikhey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: ccie exam fee


> All
>
> The Lab price increased to #1200!
> -Mike-
> --- Niraj Palikhey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Luckily, I called on Wednesday and scheduled my
> > exam. Thanks to that person
> > who posted about this "true rumor"
> > Can't believe the Cust. Serv. Rep. did not know if
> > the price was going to be
> > $300.00 the very next day :-(
> > Regards,
> > Niraj
> >
> >
> > >From: CCIE Wanna BE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: CCIE Wanna BE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: ccie exam fee
> > >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:32:30 -0800 (PST)
> > >
> > >The price went up last Thursday to $300
> > >--- Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > yes I paid 300
> > > > ""brain"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > 002201c0b1fe$8b584000$310b80cb@umer">news:002201c0b1fe$8b584000$310b80cb@umer...
> > > > hello=20
> > > >
> > > > i have heard rumors of increase in the ccie
> > > > qualification exam fee to =
> > > > 300 $. is it true. also would there be any
> > increase
> > > > in the near future =
> > > > in the passing marks of ccie qualification exam
> > > > (routing and switching) =
> > > > has anyone heard anything about it?
> > > >
> > > > thanx
> > > > umer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> > to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _
> > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> > to
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >__
> > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > >Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > >
> > >_
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> _
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Performance Comparision between Linux OS Firewall and Cisco PIX 525

2001-03-26 Thread Roger Sohn

There are a few ways to go about this.

1)You can run a stripped down (running minimal and only required services)
Linux box serving only SSH connections and you can use that machine to login
into your PIX (allowing your PIX to only accept connections from this SSH
server) and perform administration.
2) Or...you can just run the PIX and I think you can also run a TACACS+
server with it to authenticate encrypted passwords and logins, or run
encryption on the PIX itself.  I could be mistaken, but I know something
like that would probably work best.

But the thing that people have to understand is, that *no one* can
absolutely guarantee that anything can't be compromised.  It will always be
a 99.999% chance that it will be secure.  It all depends on how the
firewall you choose is set up.  Anything is breakable.

But in my opinion, I would recommend running a hardware firewall solution
such as the PIX or equivalent because the device is specifically made to run
the firewalling processes.  Unlike a Linux/Unix/NT box with a software-based
firewall system such as Checkpoint, etc. a hardware solution does not have
the OS overhead with services that firewalling does not require and also
exploits and patches that you need to constantly be up to date about, issues
that others have already mentioned.  It just comes down to how much money
you want to spend and also what you prefer.  I may prefer the Cisco PIX, but
I have friends that recommend a home-grown Unix box solution.

Just trying to help,
Roger

- Original Message -
From: "Sean Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Performance Comparision between Linux OS Firewall and Cisco PIX
525


> Allen,
> If SSH service is not open on the outside interface, how do you expect
> to troubleshoot the problem when there is problem with the Firewall?
> Tell me this, how can you troubleshoot a PIX remotely when there is
> problem? My employer is certainly not going to fly me out-of-state to fix
a
> minor problem.  Furthermore, can you absolutely guarantee me, in writing,
> that the Cisco PIX
> can never be compromised?  Another thing, what makes you think that I am
> also running other services besides Firewall features on Linux.  If you
> read my email carefully, you also notice that I only SSH and netfilter
> (aka iptables) on the Firewall.  Your reason is based purely on FUD
> (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt).
>
> Sean
>
>
> >From: "Allen May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Sean Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Performance Comparision between Linux OS Firewall and Cisco
> >PIX 525
> >Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:29:34 -0600
> >
> >Is the outside interface still open to SSH connections?  If so & it's
> >compromised, Linux is a full blown operating system that, when
compromised,
> >can have ANY program designed for Linux installed.  Can you imagine
> >something like a packet analyzer grabbing all your passwords and sending
> >them out over the net to someone else?  Ewww.  That's my #1 reason for
> >going
> >with something like a PIX.  Just make sure you're IDS is set to notify
even
> >in the event of a SUCCESSFUL connection.  I've seen people who set it up
> >for
> >unsuccessful attempts only.
> >
> >I hope that guy wasn't fired BECAUSE he recommended the Cisco solution.
> >That's totally a matter of point of view on that decision & his wasn't
> >wrong..neither was the Linux choice.  Some situations call for one while
> >others call for the other.
> >
> >Oh and keep a copy of the correctly configured drive with all settings on
> >hand.  A hard drive is much more prone to failure than RAM/ROM just due
to
> >the moving parts involved.
> >
> >Allen
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Sean Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 3:05 PM
> >Subject: Re: Performance Comparision between Linux OS Firewall and Cisco
> >PIX
> >525
> >
> >
> > > Ken,
> > > Thank you very much for the advice.  This past Friday, my company has
> > > decided to use Linux as our company Firewall.  Furthermore, we've
> >decided
> > > that this Firewall will be running kernel 2.4.2 with only two services
> > > running on it, SSH and netfilter (aka iptables).  I've tested kernel
> > > 2.4.2 in the lab and notice it performs better than kernel 2.2.x.
I've
> >also
> > > performed various intrusion detection tests on the box using
> > > Cisco NetSonar, Cybercop, ISS, Axent Netrecon but is unable to break
> > > it.  The linux box is rock-solid.  I am also running portsentry (IDS)
> > > on the Firewall itself.
> > >
> > > Also, we decide to running our squid proxy server on another linux box
> > > to provide transparent caching for our internal users.  As far as VPN
is
> > > concerns, we are going to implement Free

Re: Gateway of last resort vs. default Gateways

2001-03-27 Thread Roger Sohn

  a.. Subject: Re: gateway of last resort
  b.. From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" 
  c.. Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 11:09:44 -0500
  d.. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  e.. References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Default gateway, default route, default gateway, and may sound alike, but
each is a distinct function.  Three of the four potentially relate to one
another, and have to do with the behavior of a Cisco box when it has
routing enabled.

You use default gateway, however, on a box that is acting as a host, not as
a router.  For example, if you had a switch or access server, or a router
"box" with "no ip routing" that you were using as a bridge or X.25 switch,
that box has an IP address for management.  If the box needs to get to a
TFTP, DNS, SNMP, or other server that is not on its own subnet, the box has
to follow the same rules as any other end host:  send traffic to the
default router.  The Cisco default gateway statement is one way of telling
a non-routing box how to send traffic not on its own subnet.

The default route is a concept in RIP, OSPF, and BGP.  IGRP definitely does
not understand it.  According to some documentation, EIGRP doesn't
understand the convention I'm about to describe, but I have heard that some
versions of EIGRP do.  Needs to be checked in a lab.

The default route is the route to the address 0.0.0.0/0, which can be set
with a static route:

   ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1

where 10.1.1.1 is a reachable router interface.

You can also create the default route with a default-information-originate
router subcommand.

The default network has a similar function to the default route -- it's
where you send things you don't otherwise know where to send -- but it's
specified differently.  Note that the default router address in the static
route statement above is just that -- it's a specific host address.  The
default network statement, however, specifies not a host address but a
prefix to which you can route. (E)IGRP automatically elects a candidate
default network if you do not specify it.

GOLR is subtle.  Remember that the individual routing protocols do not
themselves decide what the default route is, or, for that matter, things
such as load balancing.  The routing protoools (or static routes) are
submitted as "suggestions" to the process that installs routes in the
routing table (or routing information base to be technical). In other
words, if you have multiple sources of routing information, "show IP route"
tells you what was installed in the RIB, which is not necessarily the view
of any specific routing protocol.

GOLR appears at the end of the show IP route display, when a GOLR exists.
Candidates for GOLR can come from any routing protocol or static route.
The selected GOLR is the address to which to send otherwise unroutable
traffic, an address from the most preferred source of default information
based on administrative distance.

Some examples might help.

  If you run OSPF (AD 110) and RIP (AD 120), and there is a default route
in each (presumably from another router generating default information),
the GOLR will be the OSPF default.

  If you run IGRP (AD 100) with a default network and OSPF, the GOLR will
be the IGRP default network.

  If you run RIP but have a static route to 0.0.0.0 with AD less than 120,
the GOLR will be the static route.

  If you ran OSPF and IGRP, but overrode the default administrative
distances such that OSPF's were less than 100, an OSPF default route would
be the GOLR if OSPF had one.  If there were no default route available to
OSPF, the IGRP default network would become the GOLR even if OSPF's AD were
less than IGRP's
--
Howard C. Berkowitz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID), Cisco University Instructor
Author of _Designing Address Architectures for Routing and Switching_,
   ISBN 1578700590, Macmillan Technical Publishing (sister group to Cisco
Press), 1998
-
To remove your name from the mailing list send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing "UNSUBSCRIBE CISCO"


- Original Message -
From: "Wang, Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Rizzo Damian'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: Gateway of last resort vs. default Gateways


> Default gateway is configured on devices that do not route, so, it must be
> an IP address that belongs to one of the connected routes of the local
> interfaces.  If you turn off routing on a cisco box, you would have to
> configure a default gateway for traffic destined for other networks
besides
> the connected ones.
>
> Gateway of last resort tells the router where to route the traffic to.  If
> the destination can not be matched with any of the routes in the routing
> table, the router will then forward that to the gateway of last resort.
In
> other words, gatew

Re: IBGP neighbors

2001-03-28 Thread Roger Sohn

By having route reflectors, it would eliminate the need for having a fully
meshed ibgp network.  The route reflectors would update and pass on routing
information to all the other clients in the network, without having to run
all these connections to each other, thus allowing to scale the network.

-Roger
- Original Message -
From: "Pickard, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: IBGP neighbors


> 3/28/2001   12:55pm  Wednesday
> =20
> Would anyone care to elaborate on IBGP neighbors?
> Must they always be fully meshed or do route reflectors negate this?
> =20
> =20
> Richard L. Pickard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 560-6482
> =20
>
>
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco 2507 Hub Router Function

2001-03-30 Thread Roger Sohn

Does anyone know what the Cisco 2507 Hub Router is good for?  Does it serve
a useful purpose?



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Help for BOOTFLASH

2001-04-02 Thread Roger Sohn

I also found it very confusing at first, but I figured this out after much
deliberation with trial and errors.

For the more upscale and "bigger" routers such as the 7200/7500 series, you
need to have a boot image and an IOS image.  The boot images are usually
between 3-5MB, around there.

You can tell if it's a boot image because it will list it in CCO under the
description.  When you choose an IOS image, you see a lot of different kinds
because each IOS image has certain built-in "goodies".  Some have some
firewalling capabilities and some support stronger encryption and etc.  The
IOS images can become pretty beefy taking up around 8-12MB.  For some of
those images, I would also recommend you check to see that you have enough
dram to run the image as well.

- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Cotts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Mixa'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: Help for BOOTFLASH


> Think of the router having three levels of intelligence. Most basic is the
> Bootstrap image stored in ROM. Next comes the boot image. Then the IOS
image
> that the router runs in production. Each has its own prompt: rommon> ,
> router(boot)>, router#. A boot image  placed in bootflash: on a 7500 will
> automatically load unless the configuration contains a boot bootldr
command
> pointing to another location. It is good, although not necessary, to have
> the boot and running IOS image be from the same release. (Comments
requested
> from others on this point). The full IOS image that you run will have
> various features. You determine what you need - then purchase it from
Cisco.
> If you have a service contract you may update (newer rev number) but not
> upgrade (add features) your IOS image. This running image is stored on a
> PCMCIA card (slot0: or slot1:) on the RSP card. Default behaviour is to
load
> the first image in slot0:
> Use "cd" to set the default location. Use "pwd" to see the current default
> location. Use boot system flash slot0: or 1:file name for other than
default
> location. If you have enough space on your PCMCIA card(s) you may store
> multiple images. It then becomes easy to change. This is very useful when
> updating - just in case the newer image doesn't behave as expected.
>
> A long way to say that on a 7500 you need both a boot image and a running
> image (the beefy one).
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mixa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 11:27 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Help for BOOTFLASH
> >
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > I have a similar question. On the CCO, there is a file called
> > bootflash
> > image and it's about 5MB to dowload. Also, there are numerous
> > images to
> > download as well as as IP, IP/FW/IPSEC etc,. Which one is the
> > image that a
> > Cisco 7507 needs to upgrade. My brother asked me a question
> > and I have no
> > idea. He wants to flash the latest IOS 12.1.1 but very
> > confuse. Where is
> > that bootflash image go on the router? What about slot 0,
> > slot 1. What about
> > all the beefy features IOS?
> >
> > Thanks
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Just Passed Routing BSCN 2.0 [7:268]

2001-04-11 Thread Roger Sohn

The test was very straight forward and you either know the stuff or you
don't.

I only used the Cisco Press book to study for this exam and read the book
cover to cover twice.  61 questions and I felt like about 50% was involved
with OSPF and 35% BGP and the remaining questions were involved with IGRP,
EIGRP, and other basics like VLSM.  Everything mentioned on Cisco's website
basically.  You just have to occasionally watch out for specific wording.
For example, there are a few questions that may give you multiple answers
that are correct...but you have to understand that the test is asking you
for the *Best* answer.

But I definitely think that my previous experience with working on routers
at work helped me out tremendously.

Thanks to everyone on this list (there are so many smart people on this list
that always kept me motivated to continue to study hard) and for those
studying for this, keep studying.  You can do it!

-Roger
CCNA
1 down, 3 to go for CCNP.  (BCRAN is next on my hit list)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=268&t=268
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Choosing the right IOS Image [7:739]

2001-04-15 Thread Roger Sohn

Hi All,

Just wanted to hear what other people are using (or would recommend) for the
IOS images on their 2500 series routers with a typical 16MB DRAM/ 8MB Flash
setup.  

I remember hearing from Louie that he ran 12.09 Enterprise Plus IOS on all
of his 2500's with that 16/8 configuration.  There's a 12.7 version but it
won't fit on only 8MB of flash space.  Does this mean that I should I
consider upgrading to 16MB flash instead?

On another note, can anyone recommend a good reference for knowing which
type of IOS images to use?  Like how I can assess whether I would want to
use a Service Provider image rather than an Enterprise image, or an IP
Image, or maybe even an Enterprise/FW/IDS IPSEC image.  I'm trying to find
out more information on what requirements would prompt me to choose one over
the other.  

I've only been able to find a few docs on CCO and they haven't helped me
much.  

Any info is always appreciated!

Thanks,
Roger




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=739&t=739
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Enterprise Plus IOS Image for 12.09/x [7:1685]

2001-04-23 Thread Roger Sohn

Are my eyes playing tricks on me or has the size of the Enterprise Plus IOS
image for the 2500 series gone up?

I thought it used to be like around 6 or 7 MB but now checking it on CCO, it
takes up 10MB.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1685&t=1685
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT- Another cool thing about Cisco (Re: Cisco fire staff) [7:2442]

2001-04-28 Thread Roger Sohn

Actually, I don't really think it's considered a "stunt".  A lot of other
CEO's do this as well such as Larry Ellison of Oracle.  The salary doesn't
really mean too much to them when they do have stock options that are worth
a lot more in the millions and billions of dollars.  

But I think it's important to recognize that stock options aren't actually
considered cold cash until you exercise them.  I don't know how to exactly
explain it, but it's not a direct expense to the company as an employee's
salary would be.  So with John Chambers taking a $1 yearly salary, that
actually helps in contributing to reduce the company's expenses.  Maybe not
as much as people would like to see it, but every penny counts.  Chambers
personally stated that he did it to also help keep 2 or 3 important execs
(who he said who were very close to him) with the company.  

All in all, I think it's pretty fair for Chambers to have the amount of
options that he does have.  If he does a good job, the company will then do
well and so will his stock (more $$ for him) and also for the shareholders
and employees.  It's a win/win situation.  If he performs horribly as a
company leader, then his options will suffer and his performance will
reflect that.  I personally think that it will be a true test to how good
Chambers really is.  If he really is "All That", then he will definitely
pull Cisco through this economic downturn and prove to people that he can
really lead.  I hope he does.  Cisco really holds a big part of shaping the
internet and the way things work.  

Just my 2 cents,
Roger


-Original Message-
From: Jason Roysdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 9:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT- Another cool thing about Cisco (Re: Cisco fire staff)
[7:2436]


It's a stunt.  His salary was like $300K.  What are his stock options for
the year worth?  I can't recall the numbers I heard (plus rumors aren't
worth much if you can't find some proof).  I found this story stating in
1997 he received 800,000 stock options for the year.  $300K is a drop in the
bucket with those sort of options (granted, you need to cash them in at the
right time).
http://www.forbes.com/asap/1998/0223/052.html

Oh, I found a better link from April '99 when he exercised 900,000 options
and then sold 850,000 of them for a profit of $80M:
http://www.xent.com/apr99/0013.html

Oh, I found even better numbers:
http://www.business.com/directory/computers_and_software/cisco_systems/peopl
e/chambers,_john_t/

I wonder if he's giving up the $1M bonus for the year?  The man has $1.23B,
yes BILLION worth of stock options.  Is it a stunt?   Hmm.  I'm not jealous,
nope, not me ;-)

Ok, $300K compared to $1B, it's 0.03% of his worth.  Whoop-tee-doo.

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/



""xc""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

> Now some of you may be thinking that the $1 salary  is just a Cisco
> publicity stunt.  Sure, maybe so.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2442&t=2442
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Flash Partition [7:2769]

2001-05-01 Thread Roger Sohn

Run a search on the archives.  There are tons of posts on this.  

-Original Message-
From: RamG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Flash Partition [7:2769]


How to combine the flash partition into ONE 16F

R2501#show flash

System flash directory, partition 1:
No files in System flash
[0 bytes used, 8388608 available, 8388608 total]
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

System flash directory, partition 2:
File  Length   Name/status
  1   4554932  igs-ir-l.110-10.3
[4554996 bytes used, 3833612 available, 8388608 total]
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

Thanks  /  RamG
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2775&t=2769
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pumpkin tftp server [7:3477]

2001-05-07 Thread Roger Sohn

Pumpkin TFTP rocks and I don't use anything else.  I've been using it for
over a year and it works flawlessly.  Extremely simple, easy to use, and
intuitive.  

-Original Message-
From: Jim Yam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pumpkin tftp server [7:3477]


What do you guys think about the Pumpkin tftp server? Have you used it?
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3496&t=3477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Congrats [7:4044]

2001-05-10 Thread Roger Sohn

I think most people don't understand that if you do work for Cisco,
employees are required to score 10 or 15% higher than the regular passing
score.  And that also goes for the CCIE Lab exam as well as the other CCxx
tests.  

Cisco also only allows 2 free lab attempts, and anything after that you have
to pay for the entire amount that everyone else pays.  

-Original Message-
From: Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Congrats [7:4044]


Gee that's kinda like working at Microsoft as a Windowz architech and
getting your MCSE! How hard can that be? Send me the CCIE's work resume out
side of the lab of Cisco, then i'll be impressed..See if you can manage
Riverstone and Nortel equipment as well.Well first you gotta survive the
Cisco layoffs. Bummer...heh..

Q

"Frank Kim"  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm proud of you.  Go Vietnamese!  I'm taking my lab this November
> also.  I hope I will be the second Vietnamese person who will send out
> such good news to the group.
>
> -Frank
>
>
>  On Thu, 10 May 2001, DUNG H. LE wrote:
>
> > May 7-8, 2001 - RTP Lab facility
> >
> > This was attempt 2. I changed my study habits from attempt 1, and
therefore
> > testing technique, for my attempt 2  (you perform like you
> > practice..right?).  It paid off. The change was to monotonously ping
every
> > interface IP / IPX address from every router. I made a list of the
> addresses
> > and ran through all of them from every router. I believe this lack of
> > attention to detail is what did me in on attempt one.
> >
> > Time management was key.  If I didn't know the config off the top of my
> > head, I skipped it.  This allowed me to complete the entire day 1
portion 3
> > hours early.  I had 4 areas that I needed to think about, so I saved
them
> > for last.  I methodically approached each of the 4 areas, knocked out
each
> > requirement, and had 1 hour left to do the testing above.  My strategy
was
> > that no matter what, I would take the last hour to test thoroughly, I
just
> > happened to get my 4 items done.  Day 2 was the same way...although only
3
> > hours for the first part, I still had 45 minutes to test it all.
> >
> > Troubleshooting was by far the most nerve-racking experience.  I had a
> > "trouble ticket" list and was told to find as many problems as I could
and
> > document/fix them (one liners).  Unexpectedly I had to troubleshoot a
> > different network than the one I had spent a day and a half configuring.
3
> > hours was the time limit to learn a new topology, IP scheme, protocol
> > intent, and then fix as much as possible.  I don't feel like I was ready
> for
> > this, and must have just kept calm enough to manage it.
> >
> > The waiting is a nerve killer.  You wait before the lab starts about an
> hour
> > for everything and everyone to get ready.  You wait all night long for
> > status on day 1's score.  You wait after day 2 build out...1.5 hours for
> > me to find out if you made it to troubleshooting.  Then you wait
while
> > they add up the points and spit a number out of the computer or not.
> > Howard  was the best!!! Comic relief goes a long way to ease my
stress,
> > and he delivered. I was very comfortable in the RTP environment.
> >
> > Study material used / frequency:
> > Caslow 2nd edition - read it cover to cover once.
> > Ccbootcamp labs - practiced daily (almost and minus weekends) for 4
> > months 4-6 hours per day on a rack of equipment that was very
similar
> to
> > the real thing.  I was very comfortable with what was required of me for
> day
> > 1 and 2 build out.  In retrospect I would have practiced a bit more on
> > troubleshooting.  I was not comfortable with this at all and could have
> used
> > some familiarity with strategy and tactic on this part.
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4085&t=4044
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco Pix Question [7:4729]

2001-05-16 Thread Roger Sohn

Here are the following concerns my client has in regards to thier
configuration.  Please give me your thoughts on this situation. 

--
 
Here are a few of the Questions we have in relation to the PIX 515 Firewall.

We are using IOS 5.2 on the PIX just so you know.

 

We need to Re-IP the Crypto Map used in the PIX to Connect to a Router in

Sweden. I know certain statements like the one below will disappear when the

Access-List for the VPN is changed. We need to make sure there are no other

statements that do something along the same lines.

crypto map mymap 5 match address 100

 

We also want to check that the statements that effect the VPN Tunnel's

Lifetime and Bit Size are correct and Reasonable, we have noticed lagging

effect on the VPN Tunnel and this could be due to misconfigurations, or just

general Internet traffic. This is a experience Question, because these are

based on Traffic Flow, the size of the company, the pipe to the Internet,

the General Traffic Are all concerns to make when setting these numbers. We

use a Full T1 and don't host any Public Services Like DNS, WWW, or FTP for

anyone outside of our company. My feeling is these numbers are based off the

books and not nessarily based on our Company, therefore they could be

incorrect. So I wish to have someone tell me thier feelings on these

settings we are currently using.

crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 86400

crypto map mymap 5 set security-association lifetime seconds 9600 kilobytes

4608000

There are also Statements that dictate the lifetime of Translations, again

we wish to make sure they are reasonable.

timeout xlate 3:00:00 conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00

timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00

timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4729&t=4729
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CCIE Home Lab? [7:5832]

2001-05-30 Thread Roger Sohn

My lab consists of:

2501 (1 Eth, 2 Serial)
2503 (1 Eth, 2 Serial, 1 ISDN)
2504 (1 Token Ring, 2 Serial, 1 ISDN)
2504 (1 Token Ring, 2 Serial, 1 ISDN)
2511-RJ (1 Eth, 1 Serial) - Terminal Server
2514 (2 Eth, 2 Serial)
2522 (1 Eth, 2 Serial, 8 Low Speed Serial, 1 ISDN) - Frame Relay Switch
2524 (1 Eth, 2 Serial, 1 ISDN)
MC3810 (1Eth, 2 Serial, 2 T1/E1)
3640 (4 Eth, 1 FE, 4 ATM)
7206VXR (2 FE, 1 ATM, 4 Serial)
Catalyst 2924 (24 FE)
Catalyst 5000 (Sup1, 24 Eth, 12 FE, 1 ATM, 48 Eth)

No voice or ISDN simulator though.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Home Lab? [7:5832]


Don,

My lab consists of :
1 2514 Dual-eth
3 2501's for BGP labs
2 4000's and a 4500 w/ various combinations of NPs (Eth, Serial, BRI, Token,

etc.)
*I think these are a great buy on ebay because you can change out the 
different NP's to adapt to the particular lab config you want to 
acheive.I also loaded mine with 16dram 8flash and 11.3 IP/IPX/AT/DEC.
1 2948G
2 1912's with Enterprise
1 2509 for Reverse Telnet (you can also get CS-508's & CS-516's on ebay, 
which are a cheaper type of Terminal Server w/o the Serial 
Interfaces.just an Eth port.)
1 Teltone ISDN Simulator (I got this on a trade of some equipment with my 
local community college..a STEAL.of course, to do the ISDN labs,

you can also get 2 ISDN circuits for a couple of months if you can afford
it.
I agree with Stogieman that the ATM and Voice stuff is probably easier doing

by renting some rack time from Fatkid (plug,plug!) or 
ipexpert.net.they have a SWEET setup..13 routers, a Frame
Switch,
an ATM switch, voice capabilities, ISDN Sim,etc...
* I would also suggest buying your cables in bulkebay,ebay,ebay
Good Luck and, remember, you can sell it all when you're done and take a 
vacation :)
Robert Hugo
CCNP+Voice, CCDP, MCSE
Network Engineer/DSL
Advanced Solutions, Inc.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6554&t=5832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Beware of Shady Equipment Sales [7:10078]

2001-06-26 Thread Roger Sohn

Most of you are probably aware of this already, but just as a reminder...


Be extremely CAREFUL of outside scam artists that try to solicit and try to
sell you Cisco equipment (or anything for that matter) by contacting you
directly.

I'm constantly bidding/selling on ebay in search of good deals and
occasionally I get emailed outside of auctions if I am interested in
purchasing the same equipment directly.  This one person emailed me the
following offer and he seemed pretty innocent and professional.  He offered
to
sell me 2514's at $450 (very good price) and 2513's at $550 (way too
reasonable), all loaded with 16/16 memory.


I agreed to his offer and informed him that I could deliver cash if he was in
the local area, or pay via COD or escrow.  He came back claiming that he
supposedly "lost tons of money and equipment" through COD and didn't want to
pay costs for escrow (although I offered to split the costs with him).  He
basically said that he could only accept payment of wire transfer and that I
could "trust" him to ship out on the same day on receipt of payment.  I asked
why he didn't post those items on ebay and he says that he'd rather do
business with people directly.  (go figure)  I ended up politely declining
his
offer.  He was never rude or discourteous to me though.

So in a nutshell, be really careful of these types of people.  Who knows, he
could've been legit and honestly been trying to sell decent equipment and
fairly low prices.  Maybe he doesn't want to list his name and maybe he
doesn't have his own business email address, but I'm 99% sure that this guy
is
out to make a quick scam on some sucker who will fall for his trick.




Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:30:31 -0700 (PDT)

From: Cisco Equipment 

Subject: RE: Cisco Units

To: Roger Sohn 

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



Greetings,

I was wondering if you'd be interested in purchasing

(5) Cisco 3640 Modular Routers for $1 US Dollars.



These units are in new, mint condition.   They've been

upgraded to 128MB of RAM and 16MB of Flash memory.



If you're interested, I can configure them with any

network modules / cards that you may want.



I'm also offering a warranty / guarentee on everyone

of our units.  They are guarenteed not to arrive DOA,

and if anything goes wrong with them from six months

after the date of purchase, you can return it for

repair or replacement at our cost.



We also have many other Cisco routers, network

modules, switches, hubs, etc. available at great

prices.  Let me know if you need anything else that

isn't on the list of commonly wanted models and I can

give you a price quote.  All prices indicated a unit

loaded with max. memory and in mint / new condition.



Cisco 2500 (entire line) - $400

Cisco 3620 - $800

Cisco 3640 - $2500

Cisco 3660 - $4000

Cisco 4500 - $2000

Cisco 7200 - $2100



ALL Network Modules Available!

We will offer discounts for bulk orders.



Email me for quotes on other routers, catalysts,

modules, etc.  We will configure with any NM's and

cards.



You can pay by wire transfer, cashier's check, money

order, personal / business check if you are interested

in purchasing them.  I will ship them via USPS Mail.





__

Do You Yahoo!?

Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35

a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10078&t=10078
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to get the activation key for my clone Pix [7:36569]

2002-02-26 Thread Roger Sohn

Now, nowlet's not threaten each other.   I'm sure the guy is just
messing around with this to see if it's possible to get the contraption to
just work.  Besides, what's the big deal anyway?  I doubt he has any
intentions of selling anything or doing something outrageous like that
anyway.  It's sort of interesting anyway - like the whole idea of porting
the JunOS onto a unix box and seeing if you can still capture most of the
functionality of their routers.  

-Original Message-
From: Jason Sullivan
To: Athony Jones; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/26/2002 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: How to get the activation key for my clone Pix?

You should take the 400 you spent and buy a 501.  I promise it will be
less
than your legal fees if Cisco were to get involved.


Jason Sullivan
Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office (801)270-6732
Pager (800)365-4578



---
Welcome to the Internet, Transportation provided by Cisco Systems


---

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Athony Jones
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to get the activation key for my clone Pix?

Hi Everyone,
After struggling for the past two days, I have
successfully cloned a Pix firewall by using my PC.
I plug the 16MB flash card into the PC's ISA slot
and the PC recognize that it is a Pix flash card
(cost me $400.00). It boots up fine and everything
seems to be in order.  However, after the boot up
sequence, it asks me for the activation key.  I've
been trying many different possible scenarios without
much success.  I even tried to use the activation key
from another Pix firewall but that doesn't work
either.

Anybody know how I can fake my clone Pix with a
fake activation key?  By the way,I am running Pix OS
code version 6.1(2). I even tried 5.3(1), 5.3(2),
6.0(1) and 6.1(1) and one of them works.  By the way,
the PC has 128MB of RAM and a 16Mb Flash ISA card.
I tried to clone a Pix520.

Please help.

Jason

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
__
To unsubscribe from the SECURITY list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe SECURITY
__
To unsubscribe from the SECURITY list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing:
unsubscribe SECURITY




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36569&t=36569
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Frame-Relay Switch intf-type DCE/DTE [7:14434]

2001-07-31 Thread Roger Sohn

I have a hub and spoke combination going without any problems.  But the only
weird thing happening is that on my Frame-Relay switch (2522), I have to set
the "frame-relay intf-type" to DCE for all the serial interfaces I'm using,
otherwise the layer 2 connections won't come up on the hub and spoke routers.

Should this be happening?

I have 3 DTE ends and 1 DCE end of cables plugging into my switch.  I thought
if I had the DTE side of the cable plugged into my S0 of my frame relay
switch, then on the interface configuration mode for "S0", I would specify
the
intf-type to be DTE.  And vice versa if the DCE side of the cable is plugged
into my switch.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14434&t=14434
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCSI info needed [7:18916]

2001-09-06 Thread Roger Sohn

Yeah...

Here you'll find out everything you need to know.

http://63.75.89.96/

-Roger
- Original Message -
From: "Omer Ehsan Dar" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:04 PM
Subject: CCSI info needed [7:18916]


> Hi all
> how does one become a CCSI other than clicking the option in the
> beginning of the test that asks the question. I have heard that the
> percentages for the tests are high for CCSI. Can anyone tell me what
> they are
> Thanks
> Omer




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18919&t=18916
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OSPF over Frame-Relay - Interface-DLCI vs. Map IP/Broadcast [7:18917]

2001-09-06 Thread Roger Sohn

I'm running OSPF over Frame-Relay in a hub and spoke
configuration.(CCbootcamp labs)  I've set up Router1(hub) to have interface
S0.1 (p2p) and interface S0.2(multipoint).  For multipoint connections, it's
pretty easy because I just input map ip statements.

But for my p2p connection, I'm having trouble understanding when I'm
supposed to use the "frame-relay interface-dlci" , "frame-relay map ip",  or
frame-relay map ip broadcast" statements on the hub and spokes.  Can anyone
help shed some light on this?

I've tried using a combination of all 3 types on both the hub and spoke, and
every time the hub and spoke are able to ping each other without any
problems.

-Roger




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18917&t=18917
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]