Re: Internet phone, is it possible? [7:65123]
Actually, there's quite a few vendors already doing this. One that I found to be quite impressive was vonage.com. They've got it figured out. I'm actually testing out their service for long distance service at my office. They give you an ATA186 with the service, which I've connected to an FXO port off my CCM system and setup least cost routing for long distance service. Actually, they had a deal on amazon where you purchase the ATA186 for $100 and they give you two months of their $40 unlimited long distance service for free. Heck, it would cost me $100 to buy an ATA186 and I get two months of free long distance included...what a deal. Quality is remarkably good. It hardly ever hiccups at all, which is surprising since our Internet connection gets hammered pretty often. Anyway, I've been doing IP phones in production for several years and this is by far the coolest VoIP service I personally have seen. Vance ps. Oh yea, 1) Vonage runs SIP. 2) When I'm on the road and run my softphone (CCM), I do notice degredation when the latency gets up to a couple hundred msec. Doesn't get unacceptable to me until about 600 - 1000 and then I start noticing dropouts. ""supernet"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > A friend of mine wants to establish a business that use internet to make > phone calls. He wants to set up PSTN gateways in some countries and sell > IP phones to high speed customers so customers can talk to each other > free of charge and they can call PSTN for a fee. I think net2phone.com > has the same thing. Anyway, He has some questions that I couldn't > answer. I appreciate if someone can help me: > > 1. Should he use SIP or CCM? > 2. Is round trip delay 200-300 msec acceptable? > > Thanks. > Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65280&t=65123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE voice written and lab [7:66948]
I took the beta exam and was quite surprised how easy it was. I didn't study because I wanted to just take it to get a feel for if it was a realistic test or not. I probably didn't pass it, but I wouldn't be completely surprised if I did pass it. If not, I will pass it next time as it is an extremely passable test. I'd say it is mostly a hybrid test comprised of the material covered in dqos, cipt, cvoice, unity, and evodd, with some basic ccnp/ccdp level stuff. Nothing earth shattering, at least not in the beta. Cheers, Vance ""Mic shoeps"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sorry I don't have an answer for you, just a question. > How was the written exam? Was it mostly protocols remembering, or was it > more of a CCNP level questions (configurations, troubleshootings, etc.)? > Would you say the exam was tougher than you anticipated (CCIE R&S level)? > > Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66959&t=66948 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TACACS - Cheap or Free [7:70764]
Hey Group, I'm just looking for a cheap or free TACACS+ server. This doesn't need to be real powerful, just something I can use for playing around and possibly to put on customer sites for real quick and easy outbound http auth authentication purposes off a PIX. Thanks, Vance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70764&t=70764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682]
Hey Stu, In simple terms, yes you are correct. However, as I'm sure you know, you need to take this type of setup with a grain of salt. If you have a decent bandwidth, low latency, consistent connection between the phone and CM, it works fine. There's absolutely no guarantees for QoS on the Internet. Now, FWIW, I use softphone on my laptop when I travel and I've gotten satisfactory results (IMO) better than 75% of the time. I always pitch this as being a *kewl* feature, but never as a selling point. I'm very, very cautious with customers over this. As long as the user using it is understanding and realizes there will be times when it doesn't work or the quality is really crappy, then typically they stay happy. Not something I'd give to Internet/computer/technology illiterate executive. I love it, by the way. Good luck, Vance ""Stuart Pittwood"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Good Morning all, > > I am just starting to look into VoIP as I have been asked by my manager to > do some research and find out if there are any benifits from VoIP for our > firm. > > Am I right in saying that if we had a solution based on Cat 6000 (or > similar) switches, with a cisco VPN solution for the home workers, that > users who use their laptop at home with cisco softphone or hardware phone > could have their telephone extenstion follow them? > > Please forgive the simplicity of my question, just making sure I am thinking > along the right lines. > > Thanks > > Stu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55685&t=55682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682]
Hey BJ, Its all about IP. Basically the softphone has a config button where you can specify your 'source' ip in a drop down of bound addresses. I usually just make sure the IP associated with the RAS connection is selected (purely for the audio stream), then the IP phone will register with CM (because it is programmed with the IP of CM), and CM will recognize and record the source ip of the phone. When CM sets up a call between two endpoints, it notifies each of the phones of the other's IP, handles the codec negotiation, etc, then steps out of the conversation and the two endpoint's RTP streams go direct. Now, if you're referring to Locations as they relate to CM, and not physical Locations, that's a different ball game. Locations in CM are used for CAC (call admission control) to limit how much bandwidth is used on the wan between sites or internal on the lan for a site (unfortunately there's no distinction between them). Personally, I haven't used this in production yet. What little I've played with it in the lab, I really didn't like the implementation in CM. I think they've got a little ways to go before this will be solid. Just my opinion, of course. Hope this helps, Vance ""B.J. Wilson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Vance - > > I too am studying All Things VoIP, and I'm curious how this would work. > Say you have User A trying to call User B. User B is currently in the > office. So User A dials '' which is User B's phone number (or "route > pattern" if you want to be specific). CallManager picks up the route > pattern, looks up User B's location, and forwards the call on. All is good. > Now, say User B is telecommuting. How does CallManager know this? How > does your RAS (remote access) server notify CM that User B's geographical > location has moved? Is there something in User B's RAS (Registration, > Admission and Status) setup that alerts CM to the fact that they're dialing > in from home? > > Thanks, > > BJ > > - Original Message - > From: "Vance Krier" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:08 AM > Subject: Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682] > > > > Hey Stu, > > > > In simple terms, yes you are correct. However, as I'm sure you know, you > > need to take this type of setup with a grain of salt. If you have a > decent > > bandwidth, low latency, consistent connection between the phone and CM, it > > works fine. There's absolutely no guarantees for QoS on the Internet. > > Now, FWIW, I use softphone on my laptop when I travel and I've gotten > > satisfactory results (IMO) better than 75% of the time. > > > > I always pitch this as being a *kewl* feature, but never as a selling > point. > > I'm > > very, very cautious with customers over this. As long as the user > > using it is understanding and realizes there will be times when it doesn't > > work or the quality is really crappy, then typically they stay happy. Not > > something I'd give to Internet/computer/technology illiterate executive. > > > > I love it, by the way. > > > > Good luck, > > Vance > > > > > > > > ""Stuart Pittwood"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Good Morning all, > > > > > > I am just starting to look into VoIP as I have been asked by my manager > to > > > do some research and find out if there are any benifits from VoIP for > our > > > firm. > > > > > > Am I right in saying that if we had a solution based on Cat 6000 (or > > > similar) switches, with a cisco VPN solution for the home workers, that > > > users who use their laptop at home with cisco softphone or hardware > phone > > > could have their telephone extenstion follow them? > > > > > > Please forgive the simplicity of my question, just making sure I am > > thinking > > > along the right lines. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Stu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55713&t=55682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682]
ey are re-connected > > to the network. > > > Both also > > > have to check in with their CallManager. > > During that process, > > > they > > > identify themselves using their MAC address, > > and announce their > > > current > > > IP address. After that, the CM can simply > > forward based on the > > > IP > > > address. This capability is one of the > > primary reasons that > > > Moves, Adds, > > > and Changes in an IP Telephony system are far > > more simple than > > > in a > > > legacy PBX environment. (The logic behind > > your response sounds > > > like it > > > comes from the legacy telephone world, which > > is very used to > > > working in a > > > very static addressing environment). > > > Bruce > > > > > > B.J. Wilson wrote: > > > > > > Hi Vance - > > > > > > I too am studying All Things VoIP, and > > I'm curious how > > > this would work. > > > Say you have User A trying to call User B. > > User B is > > > currently in the > > > office. So User A dials '' which is > > User B's phone > > > number (or "route > > > pattern" if you want to be specific). > > CallManager picks up > > > the route > > > pattern, looks up User B's location, and > > forwards the call > > > on. All is good. > > > Now, say User B is telecommuting. How > > does CallManager > > > know this? How > > > does your RAS (remote access) server notify > > CM that User B's > > > geographical > > > location has moved? Is there something in > > User B's RAS > > > (Registration, > > > Admission and Status) setup that alerts CM > > to the fact that > > > they're dialing > > > in from home? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > BJ > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Vance Krier" > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:08 AM > > > Subject: Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682] > > > > > > Hey Stu, > > > > > > In simple terms, yes you are correct. > > However, as I'm sure > > > you know, you > > > need to take this type of setup with a > > grain of salt. If > > > you have a > > > > > > decent > > > > > > bandwidth, low latency, consistent > > connection between the > > > phone and CM, it > > > works fine. There's absolutely no > > guarantees for QoS on > > > the Internet. > > > Now, FWIW, I use softphone on my laptop > > when I travel and > > > I've gotten > > > satisfactory results (IMO) better than > > 75% of the time. > > > > > > I always pitch this as being a *kewl* > > feature, but never as > > > a selling > > > > > > point. > > > > > > I'm > > > very, very cautious with customers over > > this. As long as > > > the user > > > using it is understanding and realizes > > there will be times > > > when it doesn't > > > work or the quality is really crappy, > > then typically they > > > stay happy. Not > > > something I'd give to > > Internet/computer/technology > > > illiterate executive. > > > > > > I love it, by the way. > > > > > > Good luck, > > > Vance > > > > > > ""Stuart Pittwood"" wrote in message > > > news:200210160746.HAA10542@;groupstudy.com > > ... > > > > > > Good Morning all, > > > > > > I am just starting to look into VoIP as > > I have been asked > > > by my manager > > > > > > to > > > > > > do some research and find out if there > > are any benifits > > > from VoIP for > > > > > > our > > > > > > firm. > > > > > > Am I right in saying that if we had a > > solution based on > > > Cat 6000 (or > > > similar) switches, with a cisco VPN > > solution for the home > > > workers, that > > > users who use their laptop at home with > > cisco softphone > > > or hardware > > > > > > phone > > > > > > could have their telephone extenstion > > follow them? > > > > > > Please forgive the simplicity of my > > question, just making > > > sure I am > > > > > > thinking > > > > > > along the right lines. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Stu > > > -- > > > > > > Bruce Enders Email: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chesapeake > > NetCraftsmen > > > o:(410)-280-6927, c:(443)-994-0678 > > > 1290 Bay Dale Drive, Suite 312 WWW: > > > http://www.netcraftsmen.net Arnold, MD > > 21012-2325 > > > Cisco CCSI# 96047 > > > Efax > > 443-331-0651 > > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55810&t=55682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Switching [7:56559]
Actually, there's a range command that allows you to modify multiple ports at a time. At least on the Native IOS on the 6500 and 4000s. But I agree with you, I still like the CatOS better. Vance ""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message news:200210310859.IAA15587@;groupstudy.com... > I can't speak from a great deal of experience here, but set based > switches seem easier to configure, because you can change settings for > multiple ports with one command. > > For example, on a CAT5K, to change duplex speed to full on a whole > module (12 port 10bFL) I type > > Set port duplex 3/1-12 full > > And it sets it on all 12 interfaces. Doing this in an IOS based switch > would require the use of notepad and cut and paste :) > > It would be a shame if Cisco did migrate away from the set based > language. > > What do others think? > > -Original Message- > From: John Brandis [mailto:john.brandis@;solution6.com] > Sent: 30 October 2002 23:44 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCNP Switching [7:56559] > > > Hi all, > > in relation to the commecnts on the test, I have not seen a set based > switch for almost a year now, however I look at some of my SYNGRESS CCNP > Switching book, which makes a funny comment on how "ALL" core switchs > are set based. I would like to see the tests coming up in the future, as > I feel (and this is up for debate) that a certain degree of emphasys > must be placed upon IOS based commands at the core, as thats what I > expect to see on these platforms in the future. > > What you think ? > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > > The Solution 6 Group is on the move. As of Monday 25 November, our > Sydney HQ will be located at > > Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2002 > > General Phone:(02) 9278 0666 > General Fax: (02) 9278 0555 > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you > cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a > case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all > copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other > information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the > official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * > = > > This email has been content filtered and > subject to spam filtering. If you consider > this email is unsolicited please forward > the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > request that the sender's domain be > blocked from sending any further emails. > > = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56594&t=56559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP dialer-peer question [7:47976]
I think the non-wildcard digits on POTS dial peers get stripped before they are outpulsed. So you might need a 'prefix 79' under the 'dial-peer voice 1 pots' . Good Luck, Vance ""Firesox"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am in need of a quick help. > I am configuring VOIP between two site over the internet. Each site has > it's own PBX and 2620. > The 2620 has HDV module with T1 interface directly connected the PBX via E&M > winkstart. > The connection between PBX and Router is fine at both sites. > At site 1, they have 5-digit dialing plan and site 2, they have 4-digit dial > plan. > The following config was taken from the site 2 with 4-digit dial plan. > Their extensions are 79xx. The site 1's extensions are 370xx. > The PBXs at both sites seem to be configured correctly with trunk-group and > all other neccessary configs. > My question here is should I be configuring the voice-port 1/0:1 as a > connection trunk with connection trunk command? > the router connects to the remote router when the extension from one site to > another is dialed, but it keeps ringing and never seems to ring the actual > extension. > Any help would be appreciate it. > > > controller T1 1/0 > framing esf > > linecode b8zs > > ds0-group 1 timeslots 1-24 type e&m-wink-start > > cas-custom 1 > > ! > > ! > > voice-port 1/0:1 > > operation 4-wire > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer voice 1 pots > > destination-pattern 79.. > > port 1/0:1 > > ! > > dial-peer voice 10 voip > > destination-pattern 370.. > > session target ipv4:x.x.x.x Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47977&t=47976 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP [7:48091]
Good luck! Vance ""Cisco Die-Hard"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > > I am currently trying to implement VOIP for the first time using Cisco > routers. Can you please give me a URL or any resource where i can read about > this step by step or go through a simulation. > > THIS IS URGENT, I APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSE. > > Cisco Die-Hard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48115&t=48091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP [7:48091]
Ok, that's weird. I swear I put links in therelet's try again with them in the middle of the message instead of at the top... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/index.shtml http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voip/voip.shtml Good Luck! Vance ""Vance Krier"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Good luck! > Vance > > > > > ""Cisco Die-Hard"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Team, > > > > I am currently trying to implement VOIP for the first time using Cisco > > routers. Can you please give me a URL or any resource where i can read > about > > this step by step or go through a simulation. > > > > THIS IS URGENT, I APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSE. > > > > Cisco Die-Hard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48118&t=48091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIPT Boson tests [7:48617]
I always buy the ones that are authored by [EMAIL PROTECTED] I generally find his pool of questions to be written better with the answers and explanations very detailed and accurate. Of course, I always blow through all of the demo versions first to get a feel for them...it just seems like I always prefer the ones clay authors. Just my opinion. Vance "" SF"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everybody, > > I am planing to do CIPT exam. Does anybody know which set of exam is good on > Boson out of test #1, 2 and 3. > Any comments greatly appreciated. > > Thanks > SF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48653&t=48617 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 500CS Comm Server [7:49071]
Cheers. V-- ANM-508CS#wr t Current configuration: ! hostname ANM-508CS ! enable-password ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.0.253 255.255.255.0 ! ip default-gateway 192.168.0.1 ! ! ! ip name-server 255.255.255.255 snmp-server community ! ! line vty 0 4 login line con 0 stopbits 1.5 line 1 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 2 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 3 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 4 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 5 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 6 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 7 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line 8 no exec exec-timeout 0 0 stopbits 1 line vty 0 password line vty 1 password line vty 2 password line vty 3 password line vty 4 password ! end ""trammer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > By any chance would anyone have a sample config for the 500-CS box that they > wouldn't mind posting. > > Trying to get reverse telnet working and most configs are for the 2509-2511. > > > I'm either not looking in the right place or I'm not configuring it right > for this older box. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Cheers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49075&t=49071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radius [7:50090]
Yes, its called IAS (Integrated Authentication Service) I believe. I just setup a PIX for vpn client auth and it works great. Good Luck, Vance ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi All > > Please forgive the question, however, does Win2k Server have its own Radius > Server so we can authenticate with it ? > > Thanks all and sorry for the question. > > John Brandis > > Desk: 02-9278-0629 > Mobile: 0414-495-320 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.solution6.com > > > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50096&t=50090 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cheap IP Serial Console Switch? [7:50432]
Cisco made a cheaper one, model 500CS. Specifically 508CS and 516CS with 8 and 16 rj45 serial ports and a 10Mb AUI interface. I've bought two of them on ebay for around $300, and $400. They work great. I don't see any on Ebay right now, but they show up from time to time. Good Luck, Vance ""McAllister Paul"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What's a *cheap* source or brand for a 6+ port serial console switch (db9 or > rj45) with a 10bT telnet interface? > > I don't have 1000 bucks to spend. I could get a 486 with some serial cards > if there really isnt anything out there. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50513&t=50432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP ????? [7:51621]
Hey John, LOL! You should also be able to get basic functionality out of the phones by implementing IP Keyswitch on a router. Check out the following link: www.cisco.com/go/keyswitch Good luck! Vance ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Over the weekend, i paid $22AUD to get a haircut, which has effected my > thought processing skills come monday. Thus, I need help. Its not even a > good haircut. > > My boss, without me, has purchased a Cisco 2950 switch and 10 IP Telephones > for a branch office. IP telephones, is something I have never worked with > b4. I hope this is not stupid, however I am pretty sure that the IP > telephones will not work by simply plugging into a 2950 switch. I am > assuming, the branch office will need some sort of router/specialised > software to intercept and manage the routing and IP assignment of each > phone. > > Is it possible, if some one can lend any advice on the very basic > requirments that they have used ? > > Any help/advice is much appreciated. > > John > Sydney, Australia > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51630&t=51621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: regarding Cisco Call Manager on Compaq [7:52069]
Hi Mukesh, "What is the Compaq hardware would be required to install, SW-CCM-3.1-CPQ-V2=,> Cisco Call manager software?" ***If you're not buying the bundles from Cisco MCS-7825, 7835, etc, then you'll need to put together a Compaq DL320(IDE Drives) or DL380 or IBM according to the following web site www.cisco.com/go/swonly. "Can the same software be installed on other hardware machines?" ***Yes, but its very much not supported. Never do this is a production environment. I do it only for lab purposes. "As Cisco Call Manger application runs on Windows 2000, will this part code contains Windows 2000 operatiing system also?" ***Yes, everything is included. Hope this helps. Vance ""Mukesh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > HI > What is the Compaq hardware would be required to install, SW-CCM-3.1-CPQ-V2=, > Cisco Call manager software? > Can the same software be installed on other hardware machines? What are the > Cisco approved machines on which we can install Cisco Call Manager? As Cisco > Call Manger application runs on Windows 2000, will this part code contains > Windows 2000 operatiing system also? Or if Customer need to have licensed > Windows 2000 OS and service patches, then what is the exact software ( > Windows > 2000 OS, service pathces, IIS upgrade ), would be required prior to Cisco > Call > Manager installation? > > Thanks and regards > Mukesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52079&t=52069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340]
Is the PC really 10."""258""".52.101..? V-- ""Craig Robertson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi guys, > I am having a problem with routing on a Cisco1605 router. Ethernet0 is set > to 10.1.1.17 255.255.255.0 and ethernet1 is set to 10.128.52.1 255.255.255.0 > My problem is: > > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.1.1.17 (ethernet0) > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.128.52.1 (ethernet1) > From the 10.1.1.0 network I can NOT ping 10.258.52.101 (pc on subnet) > > I have enabled ip routing on the router, however, nothing has changed. > > Can anyone please advise of the command(s) for a static route, if indeed > this is the problem. Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52343&t=52340 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Certification [7:52734]
Hey Travis, I did them DQoS, CIPT, CVOICE...but that might be a little backward. There was some QoS material on the CVoice that I might not have known if I hadn't studied the DQoS material first. DQoS is the hardest of the three, IMO (mainly because of the lack of study material). Followed by CVoice then CIPT. Although, I have quite a bit of experience on CM. I think the Boson tests are really worthwhile, although they didn't have a DQoS practice test at the time I sat the test so I haven't seen that one. Good Luck, Vance ""Bolton, Travis D"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > > I'm going to get my Voice Support certification and was wondering what order > I should take the tests (CVOICE, CIPT, or DQoS). Also are the boson exams > good for practice tests? > > Travis Bolton > Network Engineer II > CCNP,CCDA > > "Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of > value." > - Albert Einstein Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52785&t=52734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't map before ping first? [7:53599]
> "What configuration problem on a host computer can disallow a router from > maintaining its entry in an arp cache - even though the host is active?" ***Strange problem. Two things come to mind. Duplicate IP of the router on the 100.100.100.x network. The server is arping for the router and gets a response from the duplicate, therefore has the wrong arp entry and won't be able to initiate traffic for remote networks. When the ping goes across, the router arps the server, causing the server to update its arp cache with the correct entry, and now it can work properly. I doubt that's the case becuase the 'net use' statements shouldn't have done anything different then the ping from that perspective. Secondly, I saw a really strange problem with a wireless bridge (breezecom) one time. Layout was print server ---6509(L3)bridgejetdirect. For some reason, the bridge would lose the arp entry (or something) and stop forwarding requests to the jetdirect if it was inactive for more than about 10-15 minutes. Since the MSFC was caching the arp entries for 4 hours, it didn't arp the jetdirect 30 minutes later when a print job came through. You could not ping the jetdirect from the msfc. But, if you dropped a machine on the other side of the bridge (from the jetdirect) but inside the msfc, you could ping it (because it initiated an arp) and then everything else would start working since the bridge was 'woke' back up. I sniffed the connections and when we pinged it from the msfc, I could see the icmp echo go into the bridge, it just never came out the other side...until a fresh arp. I never did resolve the underlying problem, just lowered the msfc arp cache aging time to 10 minutes. Weird stuff. Good luck, Vance ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > When pinging to a device for the first time the first ping times out while > the last network device (router) arps for the hardware address of the host > (server). (I'm assuming that the server is at a remote location from you.) > The router should then maintain the ip to MAC translation in its arp table > for a specified time. The arp table timeout (due to inactivity) on Cisco > routers is four hours. I think that we can assume that the server is busy > enough that it should maintain its entry in the routers arp cache. The > router seems ok because it works fine with other servers - hopefully on the > same subnet. That points to the server. I believe that you posted this > question the other day and indicated then that the problem had just started > happening. The question then is "Who messed with the server recently?" and > "What did they do?" What configuration problem on a host computer can > disallow a router from maintaining its entry in an arp cache - even though > the host is active? I can't state a definitive answer for that -- but I'd > sure want to check the subnet mask and default gateway values on that > server. > Please post your solution to the list. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:46 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: can't map before ping first? [7:53599] > > > > > > I have a server which always has problem mapping to other PC > > across the WAN > > (other branch network). But it works after I ping to > > overseas PC (as shown > > below). Do you know what might be the problem. My other > > server don't have > > this problem and it is still the same after I switch it to > > another switch > > port. > > > > > > > > C:\>net use * \\w2k01\c$ > > > > System error 53 has occurred. > > > > > > > > The network path was not found. > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\>net use * \\100.100.100.19\c$ > > > > System error 53 has occurred. > > > > > > > > The network path was not found. > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\>ping w2k01 > > > > > > > > Pinging w2k01 [100.100.100.19] with 32 bytes of data: > > > > > > > > Request timed out. > > > > Reply from 100.100.100.19: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=124 > > > > Reply from 100.100.100.19: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=124 > > > > Reply from 100.100.100.19: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=124 > > > > > > > > C:\>net use * \\100.100.100.19\c$ > > > > Drive G: is now connected to \\100.100.100.19\c$. > > > > > > > > The command completed successfully. > > > > > > == > > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > > onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > > == > > The information contained in this message may be confidential > > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > > her
Re: Need to make an access port very slow on a 2950 [7:54764]
Hey John, One thing that comes to mind is rate-limiting. Do you have L3? Maybe you could create a new vlan (to make all traffic go through the L3 device) with a new subnet and drop that port/pc into that vlan. Then setup an access-list and rate limit commands to throttle that traffic to 9600. Something like this: access-list rate-limit 110 interface rate-limit input access-group rate-limit 110 9600 0 0 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop rate-limit output access-group rate-limit 110 9600 0 0 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop Good luck, Vance ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Without going into it to much, I really would like to set some type of > policy where by a user's PC on port 5 of my 2950 switch, has access to the > rest of the LAN at 9.6kb/s..Can this be done on the switch, or do I need to > do this on my 4006 ? > > John > Sydney Australia > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > * > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54777&t=54764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE [7:72955]
Check these out. http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw03/presos/voice.html V-- ""Muhtari Adanan"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone willing to share CCIE power sessions (2003)slides? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73102&t=72955 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
