RE: Booting from slot0: [7:36841]
try boot system flash slot0:image-name.bin Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Douglas McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Booting from slot0: [7:36841] I am having troubles getting a 7000 Series router to boot from slot0: only. I tried the command boot flash slot0:, but it is still not working... I know the answer is right in front of my face... Ideas? :-) = Douglas McConnell - Senior Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Professional __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36853t=36841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Study partner [7:36856]
Hi all, I passed the CCIE written today and I'm looking for someone to study with for the lab. I'm in Burlington, MA and have my own lab to use but would like to tackle the lab with someone. Give me a shout if you're in the area and want to study. Woody CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36856t=36856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Booting from slot0: [7:36841]
Here's a good link. watch the wordwrap http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/f un_c/fcprt2/fcreboot.htm this link has an excellent diagram of the boot sequence and how to manipulte it. let me know if after reading it, you still can't figure it out. If you find that you do have the config-register set properly, what the boot sequence to see if the router attempts to boot off of slot0 and what the results are, i.e. if it says bad image or unable to boot. Something like that. Hope that helps. Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Douglas McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:15 PM To: Woods, Randall, SOBUS; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Booting from slot0: [7:36841] Woody, Didn't work... Is this related to the config-register and/or config_field= ... ? --- Woods, Randall, SOBUS wrote: try boot system flash slot0:image-name.bin Woody CCNP -Original Message- From: Douglas McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Booting from slot0: [7:36841] I am having troubles getting a 7000 Series router to boot from slot0: only. I tried the command boot flash slot0:, but it is still not working... I know the answer is right in front of my face... Ideas? :-) = Douglas McConnell - Senior Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Professional __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Douglas McConnell - Senior Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Professional __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36895t=36841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Serial DTE/DCE cables [7:35388]
My favorite place to get them is www.kg2.com Great prices and great customer service. I also have a 2501 for sale. Just upgraded to a 2610 to do VoIP stuff. If anyone wants the details on the 2501, send an email to me directly Woody -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: Serial DTE/DCE cables [7:35388] Hi, Try this website. They have back to back cables at outragous prices $29 ... 60 pins to 60 pins. In al sizes ... http://www.symmic.com/computer/cabcisco.htm Good luck. Do you know by any chance some 2500 serie routers for sale ? Cheers Ronald On 14 Feb 2002 05:24:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick Donlon) wrote: Hi I'm after some serial cables for a home lab, anyone have any sources for these in the UK and Europe, I'm looking to buy about 10 in total (1m or 3m lengths) Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35412t=35388 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VOIP for CCIE [7:34849]
I decided to go with a 2610 and a MC3810 to do VoIP. Thanks for all the info. I was planning on using the 1750 but after looking at the MC3810, they look like what I want. Thanks again Woody -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VOIP for CCIE [7:34849] Here is an example list of images for the 1750 i think this was 12.0.7T IP PLUS IPSEC 56 IP/FW/IDS IP/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 56 IP/IPX IP/IPX/AT/IBM IP/IPX/AT/IBM PLUS IP/IPX/AT/IBM/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 56 IP/IPX/AT/IBM/VOICE/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 56 IP/IPX/FW/IDS PLUS *IP/IPX/VOICE/FW/IDS PLUS* you could probably do a lot with this one IP/VOICE PLUS IP/VOICE PLUS IPSEC 56 IP/VOICE/FW/IDS PLUS IP/VOICE/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 56 - Original Message - From: Rik Guyler To: Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:49 PM Subject: RE: VOIP for CCIE [7:34849] I considered those for my lab as well but Brad Ellis mentioned that they won't run Enterprise IOS, which limits their value in your lab. Rik -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VOIP for CCIE [7:34849] try a 1750 or 1751. Woods, Randall, SOBUS wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could give me some recommendations of what equipment would be best suited for adding VOIP to my home lab. I am considering getting the 2600 series but wanted some advise on if there was anything smaller or better suited for the job. Thanks for the help. Woody Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35414t=34849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: back-to-back Wic-1DSU-T1 Snaffu... [7:35431]
I've set up a similar lab with 2611's with those cards installed. I had the same problem when I was using a short cable, 6 feet. I increased the length of the cable to 20 feet and the circuit came up. I then used my old crossover cable on a router that had an external csu to see if the cable was bad and it wasn't. I would try using a longer crossover cable. Woody -Original Message- From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: back-to-back Wic-1DSU-T1 Snaffu... [7:35431] Ok guys and gals...Here's the situation that I hope someone can slap me on the back of the head and go, you dummy, you forgot to do that! ... and then tell me what to do to fix it. I have two 1700 routers with 12.1.5YBx IOS code running, and each has a WIC-1DSU-T1 card in them. Very simple Back-To-Back lab... at least you would think. I've double-checked to make sure that my STP cable has pins 1,2 and 4,5 reversed... 1 to 4 (wire color orange/white) and 2 to 5 (wire color solid orange). I've put in on one router only, the Service-Module T1 Clock Source Internal command, and have even gone the extra measure of hand coding the line code, and frame commands - B8ZS and ESF. I've changed the LBO to none, and -15db on both units in mirror image fashion. I've specified Timeslots All and Timeslots 1-24 speed 64 on both routers in mirror fashion. Still NADA. The following is the config's and their associated Show Service Module S0 outputs. Somebody, please tell me what the heck I'm doing wrong!! I can configure this on the old DB60 cabling configuration all day long with no problem at all. Router A: interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp service-module t1 lbo -15db service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 RouterA#sh int s0 Serial0 is down, line protocol is down Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU Internet address is 10.1.1.1/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LCP Closed Closed: IPCP, CDPCP Last input 01:07:20, output 01:07:20, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:48:15 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1152 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 98 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=down DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=down RouterA#sh service-module s0 Module type is T1/fractional Hardware revision is 0.88, Software revision is 0.2, Image checksum is 0xED22BEC5, Protocol revision is 0.1 Transmitter is sending remote alarm. Receiver has loss of frame, Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Current clock source is line, Fraction has 24 timeslots (64 Kbits/sec each), Net bandwidth is 1536 Kbits/sec. Last user loopback performed: no loopback duration 01:49:32 Last module self-test (done at startup): Passed Last clearing of alarm counters 00:55:40 loss of signal:0, loss of frame :1, current duration 00:55:40 AIS alarm :0, Remote alarm :0, Module access errors :0, Total Data (last 18 15 minute intervals): 2746 Line Code Violations, 510 Path Code Violations 1185 Slip Secs, 9840 Fr Loss Secs, 6636 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 3 Severely Err Secs, 9837 Unavail Secs Data in current interval (606 seconds elapsed): 0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 606 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins 0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 606 Unavail Secs RouterB: interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue service-module t1 clock source internal service-module t1 lbo -15db service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 RouterB#sh int s0 Serial0 is down, line protocol is down Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU Internet address is 10.1.1.2/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LCP Closed Closed: IPCP, CDPCP Last input never, output
RE: One Source [7:35313]
It's funny that you mention that. I just recently bought a couple of routers from them off ebay and one of them was dead when I received it. I took almost a month to get a replacement. The one shipped did work but during the whole process, they never responded to email and never initiated a call to me to atleast let me know the status of the shipment. I guess it could have been worse but how hard is it to send a freakin' email? Woody -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: One Source [7:35313] Be very careful if you are dealing with this company. They were formerly Grandstore , until the name was trashed like @!#$ and then they became IQSale , and then THAT name was trashed and now they changed name again.. So BE CAREFUL ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35322t=35313 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CS-500 terminal server cabling [7:35221]
Here's a good link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/comm_server.html watch the word wrap. Woody -Original Message- From: James Barber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CS-500 terminal server cabling [7:35221] Hallo, I've got a 8 port CS-500 terminal server connected to a bunch of Cisco router console ports and am battling to get the cabling right. Anyone done this before ? Thanks ___ http://www.webmail.co.za the South-African free email service Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35234t=35221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOIP for CCIE [7:34849]
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could give me some recommendations of what equipment would be best suited for adding VOIP to my home lab. I am considering getting the 2600 series but wanted some advise on if there was anything smaller or better suited for the job. Thanks for the help. Woody Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34849t=34849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Terminal server tacacs+ question [7:34607]
Hannes, you would configure it like this Router(config)#aaa authentication local-override In this case, the router will first check to see if there is a local user specified before checking the tacacs server. If one doesn't exist locally then it would check the tacacs server. Hope that helps. Woody -Original Message- From: Kumari, Hannes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Terminal server tacacs+ question [7:34607] Hi All, Im tring to configure 2509 (with 8 async ports) as a terminal server so that I could access my network devices via console port. I have my default tacacs policy in place but in addition to that I would like to have sepparate policy for third parties ( IT depatment needs console acces to servers aswell ). And now the problem, when tring to reverse-telnet like this : telnet 10.10.10.10 2001 It first checks the tacas for authentication, but I have no intention to auth. 3`rd parties thougt tacacs but have created local usernames/password in 2509 How should the config look like in order it to check local usernames/password first befor tacacs auth. --- my current conf in 2509 aaa now-model aaa authentication login default tacacs+ enable aaa authentication enable default tacacs+ enable aaa authorization exec default tacacs+ if-authenticated ... username kala password 0 kala rgds, Hannes Kumari Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34660t=34607 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terminal server for sale [7:33094]
Hi all. I have a 508-CS Terminal server that I'm selling if anyone's interested. I was going to sell it on ebay but figured I would offer here first. It works great for reverse telnet into routers. Just like the 2509 but no serial interfaces. I needed more than 8 ports so I upgraded to the 516-CS. I will sell it here for $225 Plus shipping. let me know if you need any more info. Woody Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33094t=33094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wic 1T [7:32133]
check it The WIC-2T provides two serial ports using the Smart Serial connector. Asynchronous support with a maximum speed of 115.2 Kbps, minimum 600 bps. If you need to run at speeds lower than 600 bps, use theAUX port instead. Synchronous support with a maximum speed of 2.048 Mbps. Supports one port at 8 Mbps when used in NM-1FE1R2W, NM-1FE2W, NM-2FE2W, or NM-2W or Cisco 2600 chassis WIC slots. All other WIC ports on that network module or Cisco 2600 chassis must not be used. woody -Original Message- From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] anyone knows what WIC should I use on a 26xxx if I want it to support 8mbps knowing that WIC-1T only support up to 2mbps --- Stefan Dozier wrote: Actually the WIC-1T can be used in asynchronous mode on the 1600 and 1700 series platforms! The command you're looking for is physical-layer async In all other platforms, it operates in sychronous mode only. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] The WIC-1T is synchronous only. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw_1t_wic.shtml If you want a WIC card that supports asynchronous serial then a WIC-2A/S would do. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/wic-2as.shtml You mention modem support. Is your aux port free? If so, any reason why it won't meet your needs? -Original Message- From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wic 1T [7:32133] Hi all i have been searching on the cisco site for some information relating to WIC1T. I have just installed one into a 1720 for a modem connection now by cisco (or the information i can find ) the 1720 with this module supports both aysnc and sync's modes. now my question is do i have to do anything special to get it to work in async mode . by the way my ios is 12.0(3)T any help appreciated D'Wayne Saunders, Network Administrator Ph:08 89507742 Fax:08 89521112 Mobile: 0419 823 568 www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... ** * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32872t=32133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco 26xxx to run 8mbps [7:32628]
Here is a possible config to achieve 8mbps for a frame-relay connection. ISP Frame Switch-DL3800-8xT1-DL3800-2600 w/WIC-2T The WIC-2T would be installed in NM-1FE1R2W, NM-1FE2W, or NM-2FE2W and no other WIC modules installed. I don't know if using the Digital Link 3800's is cheaper than the DS3 ATM cards but this is one option. Woody -Original Message- From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco 26xxx to run 8mbps [7:32628] hi all thanks for all the comments and tips given by some of you guys . It seems like a 26xxx cannot cater for 8mbps traffic . If this is so what is the min cisco router that supports 8mbps and what interface this router will need? thanks suaveguru __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32687t=32628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wic 1T [7:32133]
check it The WIC-2T provides two serial ports using the Smart Serial connector. Asynchronous support with a maximum speed of 115.2 Kbps, minimum 600 bps. If you need to run at speeds lower than 600 bps, use theAUX port instead. Synchronous support with a maximum speed of 2.048 Mbps. Supports one port at 8 Mbps when used in NM-1FE1R2W, NM-1FE2W, NM-2FE2W, or NM-2W or Cisco 2600 chassis WIC slots. All other WIC ports on that network module or Cisco 2600 chassis must not be used. woody -Original Message- From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] anyone knows what WIC should I use on a 26xxx if I want it to support 8mbps knowing that WIC-1T only support up to 2mbps --- Stefan Dozier wrote: Actually the WIC-1T can be used in asynchronous mode on the 1600 and 1700 series platforms! The command you're looking for is physical-layer async In all other platforms, it operates in sychronous mode only. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] The WIC-1T is synchronous only. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw_1t_wic.shtml If you want a WIC card that supports asynchronous serial then a WIC-2A/S would do. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/wic-2as.shtml You mention modem support. Is your aux port free? If so, any reason why it won't meet your needs? -Original Message- From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wic 1T [7:32133] Hi all i have been searching on the cisco site for some information relating to WIC1T. I have just installed one into a 1720 for a modem connection now by cisco (or the information i can find ) the 1720 with this module supports both aysnc and sync's modes. now my question is do i have to do anything special to get it to work in async mode . by the way my ios is 12.0(3)T any help appreciated D'Wayne Saunders, Network Administrator Ph:08 89507742 Fax:08 89521112 Mobile: 0419 823 568 www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... ** * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32471t=32133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSFC [7:30668]
Scottie, This is another option you can try. Single Router Mode (SRM). It will migrate the configs of the primary MSFC to the back-up just like the Supervisor Module does when it fails. We are in the process of testing this feature out at my company. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg _gd/redund.htm#xtocid1228929 hope this helps Woody -Original Message- From: Scottie @ PacBell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MSFC [7:30668] Depending on your topology. If you have only one Cat, I would definitely configure it as two separate routers. However if you have two Cats each with dual MSFCs then I would configure them as Active and Standby. With the first scenario mentioned above it gives you redundant routing capabilities immediately whereas the second option takes a few seconds to kick in. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:51 AM Subject: MSFC [7:30668] I have a 6509 switch with 2 MSFC's. I would like to know if I can or should I have the same config on both MSFC's. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30913t=30668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSFC [7:30668]
As soon as you turn on single-router-mode, it will sync up the redundant MFSC on that switch automatically. Of course this will need to be performed on every switch that has redundant MFSC's installed. There are also a few things that have to be checked first i.e. both MSFC's are running Cisco IOS release 12.1(8a)E2 or later, stuff like that. That link I sent earlier explains what needs to take place pretty well. Woody -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:41 AM To: Woods, Randall, SOBUS Subject: RE: MSFC [7:30668] Well I does have two switches. And they both have two MSFC's. So my question was should the MSFC's have the same config or will it be copy automaticaly. On Fri, 04 January 2002, Woods, Randall, SOBUS wrote: Scottie, This is another option you can try. Single Router Mode (SRM). It will migrate the configs of the primary MSFC to the back-up just like the Supervisor Module does when it fails. We are in the process of testing this feature out at my company. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_6_3/confg _gd/redund.htm#xtocid1228929 hope this helps Woody -Original Message- From: Scottie @ PacBell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MSFC [7:30668] Depending on your topology. If you have only one Cat, I would definitely configure it as two separate routers. However if you have two Cats each with dual MSFCs then I would configure them as Active and Standby. With the first scenario mentioned above it gives you redundant routing capabilities immediately whereas the second option takes a few seconds to kick in. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:51 AM Subject: MSFC [7:30668] I have a 6509 switch with 2 MSFC's. I would like to know if I can or should I have the same config on both MSFC's. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30927t=30668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
