RE: Dedicated T1 to Japan [7:15209]
@!#$ OFF This has sod all to do with passing the CCIE exam! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenny Sallee Sent: 08 August 2001 00:03 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Dedicated T1 to Japan Does anyone here know the approximate cost of a dedicated T1 from the west coast to Japan. Doesn't need to be exact I just need rough numbers. I apologize for being off subject. **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15209t=15209 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: All-in-one CCIE Lab Study Guide: Lab #4
do you have ip classless enabled? Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Ross Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 15:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GroupStudy LAB Subject: All-in-one CCIE Lab Study Guide: Lab #4 I have started going through the labs in the All-in-one Study Guide and = have a problem with Lab #4. The lab is for an ISDN floating static = route. I am using 2 3104's and an AGS+ as a frame_switch. The ISDN port = can ping the other ISDN port. Both are on the same subnet, 196.1.1.1 and = 196.1.1.2. The ISDN line (using a Teltone simulator) dials fine, but the = Static route does not appear in the routing table. I am using IOS = version 11.2 Enterprise on both ISDN routers(3104's, upgraded to run IOS = 11.2 Enterprise). I have entered the route several times and double = checked by entries: IP ROUTE 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 196.1.1.2 121 , but the = route will not appear in my routing table. Anyone ran across this = problem? I will probably see what I am overlooking soon, but insight is = appreciated. Thanks, Tim ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Netmeeting through PIX
As long as you are not using PAT. I came across this a while ago. The dynamic port allocation is a real killer! Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 23:14 To: Aaron K. Dixon Cc: Jim Bond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Netmeeting through PIX hmm, if your using a pix or ios firewall you could probably use application level packet inspection, maybe with some reflexive access lists to allow most of that stuff to work dynamically (at least for stuff originated on the inside) Brian On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Aaron K. Dixon wrote: I haven't tried this before, but according to microsoft the following ports need to be opened. Port Function Outbound Connection 389 Internet Locator Service (ILS) TCP 522 User Location Service TCP 1503 T.120 TCP 1720 H.323 call setup TCP 1731 Audio call control TCP Dynamic H.323 call control TCP Dynamic H.323 streaming Real-Time Transfer Protocol (RTP) over UDP If you use a firewall to connect to the Internet, it must be configured so that the IP ports are not blocked. To establish outbound NetMeeting connections through a firewall, the firewall must be configured to do the following: Pass through primary TCP connections on ports 389, 522, 1503, 1720, and 1731. Pass through secondary TCP and UDP connections on dynamically assigned ports (1024-65535). Reference: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/NetMeeting/Corp/reskit/Chapter4/default.asp Regards, Aaron K. Dixon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 12:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Netmeeting through PIX Hello, I'm setting up a MS Netmeeting server behind a PIX, persons outside of PIX will call in. Which ports I should open on the PIX? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Brian Feeny, CCNP+ATM, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Questions...
I had all four of these on my ccie 350-001. This is breaking the NDA, if of course, you have actually taken the exam. Please don't post things like this again. It just shows ignorance. Andy Lennon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Chung Sent: 17 September 2000 13:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Questions... Question 1: Router A and Router B are configured to route IP to each other over a serial line. Host A is connected to Router A and Host B is connected to Router B. A packet is sent from Host A to host B. A hit on the serial line causes an error in the packet. Retransmission is sent by: Question 2: During the middle of a TCP conversion across a routed backbone, the network receives a voltage spike and several of the packets are damaged. Where are the packets retransmitted from? Question 3: Computer1 [Segment A]---RouterA--RouterB--[SegmentB]--Compu ter2 A packet is sent to Computer 2 from Computer 1. A collision occurs on Segment B. Which device will retransmit the frame and what will the source MAC address be (when the packet actually reaches Segment B)? Question 4: When computer A sends a frame to computer B across many routers, how will the source and destination layer 3 addresses change? How will the source and destination layer 2 addresses change? **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Questions...
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Chung Sent: 17 September 2000 13:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Questions... Question 1: Router A and Router B are configured to route IP to each other over a serial line. Host A is connected to Router A and Host B is connected to Router B. A packet is sent from Host A to host B. A hit on the serial line causes an error in the packet. Retransmission is sent by: host A Question 2: During the middle of a TCP conversion across a routed backbone, the network receives a voltage spike and several of the packets are damaged. Where are the packets retransmitted from? sending host Question 3: Computer1 [Segment A]---RouterA--RouterB--[SegmentB]--Compu ter2 A packet is sent to Computer 2 from Computer 1. A collision occurs on Segment B. Which device will retransmit the frame and what will the source MAC address be (when the packet actually reaches Segment B)? computer1, mac address router b Question 4: When computer A sends a frame to computer B across many routers, how will the source and destination layer 3 addresses change? How will the source and destination layer 2 addresses change? layer3 does not change, layer 2 changes at each routing point/decision Andy Lennon. PS. Don't post ccie written questions again **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI dialout help
This is on a UK/Europe switch so this is the correct router. Try "ppp auth pap callin" to avoid trying to authenticate your far end router (providing they use pap). change the ip route statement to: "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 interface bri0 perm" to fix the routing issue let us know how you get on Andy Lennon ccnp/dp/msce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stull, Cory Sent: 06 September 2000 15:55 To: Todd Plambeck Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ISDN BRI dialout help Todd, He wouldn't have gotten connected if that was the problem. It looks more like an authentication type problem. Just a guess... -Original Message- From: Todd Plambeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Zafar' Subject: RE: ISDN BRI dialout help The Cisco 2503 has an S/T ISDN Interface NOT a U interface. Meaning you need an NT-1 Adapter to connect to the ISDN line from the telco. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zafar Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN BRI dialout help Hello, I am trying to configure ISDN BRI for dialout using 2503 but could not connect to remote access server of the ISP. I have taken a ISDN dialup account from ISP and it has given me "userid", passwd and dialup number. I tried these through normal dialup (windows dun) and it connects succesfully. Now I have following configuration for my 2503 router but this could not connect. Please advise if I am missing something as I am new to ISDN and doing it for the first time ! interface BRI0 ip address negotiated ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no ip split-horizon dialer idle-timeout 2147483 dialer string 1214 dialer hold-queue 10 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication pap ppp pap sent-username myusername password mypassword ! ip route 204.71.200.45 255.255.255.255 BRI0 ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit when I ping 204.71.200.45 , following appears on the terminal: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 204.71.200.45, timeout is 2 seconds: 00:58:39: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 64 changed to up 00:58:40: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:58:46: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 1214 . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) 00:59:03: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected from 1214 , cal l lasted 22 seconds 00:59:03: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to down 00:59:05: %ISDN-6-LAYER2DOWN: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 64 changed to dow sh in bri0 BRI0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) Hardware is BRI Internet address will be negotiated using IPCP MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set Last input 00:00:01, output 00:00:01, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:09:44 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 536 packets input, 3389 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 534 packets output, 3376 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 13 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 35 carrier transitions ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the NSC Group. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and
RE: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed!
Hi all One of the questions in the survey is who do you work for. Bearing in mind that Cisco employees have a different pass-mark, need I say any more? BTW passed my CCIE design written today :) Now only if I didn't have to wait so long to retake my r/s lab Andy Lennon CCNP/DP MCSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: 31 August 2000 19:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kevin Wigle Subject: Re: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed! I never asked Cisco about the survey. I asked whether the tests were adaptive, (i.e. would change based on answers you give to the technical questions early on in the test.) The answer was no. I'm sure that the survey does not affect the questions you get either. Cisco did say that some questions are weighted more than others. But that's not the same as adaptive and is not relevant to the survey. Assuming that Cisco's training department adds any complex test processing features, when they can barely ship a valid test with logical questions and objectives not written by lucky monkeys, is just falling for FUD. (fear, uncertainty and doubt ;-) Priscilla At 10:03 PM 8/30/00, you wrote: Well, I've been up on the archives just now and searched on "oppenheimer;survey" as well as many other combos - no luck. Can you shed more light? Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 30 August, 2000 12:19 Subject: RE: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed! Look in the archives. Princilla Oppenheimer asked cisco about whether the surwey affects the score and posted the answer to this list a few months ago. I can not explain it better than cisco did. regards Jon Eggert Gudmundsson MCSE,CCNA,CCDA Network Administrator Icelandic Banks Data Center -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27. ágúst 2000 23:15 To: Brian; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nigel Taylor; Chuck Larrieu Subject: Re: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed! Although the idea that the survey affects the score is interesting, I too cannot fathom how the survey matters. You can answer the survey different for every exam. Where is the continuity there? And explain to me the difference between a "beginning" CCIE Candidate and a "seasoned" CCIE Candidate. Changing your answers to the survey seems like an easy way to improve your odds. How would Cisco know that your survey answers are correct? In truth, I don't think I have answered all the surveys the same as I have grown from the first Cisco exam over 2 years ago to completing CCDP/CCDP just last month. Nah, I don't think the survey means anything to us. I do think that Cisco wants to know the demographics of who is taking what exams. Unfortunately this would mean that Cisco is adding a little scare tactic to get you to answer their survey but perhaps adding a little more anxiety when you need it least. my .02 cents Kevin Wigle CCDP/CCNP... - Original Message - From: "Brian" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Nigel Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 27 August, 2000 17:24 Subject: Re: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed! On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to agree with Chuck on this matter. The survey IS NOT / CAN'T BE an influence on your score. The cisco exams are not even "adaptive" like the Novell exams. The questions are pulled from a pool established by evaluating the beta exam results and a certain number of questions are pulled for each subsection of the exam. There really would be no point to making the exam difficulty relative to survey responses. If Cisco did that, the exams would be WORTHLESS, allowing you to sandbag them by answering that you are a complete novice. What is the CCIE written supposed to do ? Fill out the survey that you have 2 weeks experience and it'll give you CCNA-level questions instead of asking about obscure details of token ring? The difficulty level of the exam is a constant, not a variable. Read the disclaimer next time you test. It clearly states that how you answer the questionairre will influence your score. Cisco tests are not adaptive, but they are weighted. If you are a beginner, you would be expected not to miss questions on fundementals..perhaps those are weighted more, vs. questions that are more advanced which it may weigh less for a beginner. If you claim you are the God of networking, you would probably get more weight to more advanced questions, and penalized less for missing beginner questions that might be say something someone more advanced may have forgotten. I
RE: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE.
have you tried subinterfaces ? Andy Lennon CCNP/DP MCSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erick B. Sent: 01 September 2000 06:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Groupstudy Cisco Subject: Re: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE. Each cisco interface can only be inside or outside, not both. Looks like you'll have to get a 2nd ethernet for your 2600. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have an Ethernet Network with 2 ips. One ip is Internet IP. The other is PRIVATE ip. I want the machines with the private ip\'s also to browse without the use of a proxy server. is it possible to implement this is cisco NAT or anyother service. The cisco IOS version is 11.3 and the router is cisco 2600 model with a single ethernet port. regards - This mail sent through http://www.sify.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voip - New QOS features needed
good ole 3810's :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Javier Contreras Sent: 01 September 2000 11:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Voip - New QOS features needed Hi If you are using 36XX or 26XX, cisco recomends 12.1.3a, it works fine ( I tested) but with the 3810, I had quite horrible results... Regards! "Jônatas Amorim" escribió: Hi, Could someone please give a reference where I could find the new QOS features for VOIP. I'm working with the 12.0(7)T IOS version. Tank in advance, Jônatas Lima de Amorim _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- Javier Contreras Albesa Standard Trainer PRO IN Training S.L. PROfessional Information Networks World Trade Center, Moll de Barcelona S/N Edif Sur, Planta 4 Phone: (+34) 93-5088850 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (+34) 93-5088860 Internet: http:// www.proin.com SHAPING THE FUTURE - BE PART OF IT! ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE.
Use loopback interfaces coupled with route maps and access lists and Nat. Use one loopback as an inside, the other as an outside. Set next hop addresses in the route maps to match your loopbacks It is similar in principle to a static nat and dynamic nat with ipsec combination (which I have running now). Andy Lennon, CCNP/DP MCSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of CiscoDiety Sent: 01 September 2000 15:14 To: andrew lennon; 'Erick B.'; 'Groupstudy Cisco' Subject: Re: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE. Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10, IEEE 802.1Q, or ISL vLAN. So, unless you have it in a switched environment, you're out of luck. Clayton Dukes Internetwork Solutions Engineer Internetwork Management Engineer Thrupoint, Inc. CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP SunCSA, Etc. - Original Message - From: "andrew lennon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Erick B.'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "'Groupstudy Cisco'" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:01 AM Subject: RE: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE. have you tried subinterfaces ? Andy Lennon CCNP/DP MCSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erick B. Sent: 01 September 2000 06:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Groupstudy Cisco Subject: Re: NAT WITHIN An ETHERNET INTERFACE. Each cisco interface can only be inside or outside, not both. Looks like you'll have to get a 2nd ethernet for your 2600. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have an Ethernet Network with 2 ips. One ip is Internet IP. The other is PRIVATE ip. I want the machines with the private ip\'s also to browse without the use of a proxy server. is it possible to implement this is cisco NAT or anyother service. The cisco IOS version is 11.3 and the router is cisco 2600 model with a single ethernet port. regards - This mail sent through http://www.sify.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed!
well, im sorry you failed but... is it a bunch of bull cos u failed? ccnp/ccdp is very different as i am sure you now know why if it was so highly overrated then why did you fail? If you do pass, then all that has happened is that you are now eligible to request a lab exam, and if you got 60 here you are here to mars away from being ready If you thought you gto a 90 and got 30 odd less and you really thought that you should have got 90 then you need to wise up and be humble andy lennon ccnp/dp/msce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shanseverijn Sent: 27 August 2000 01:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed! I just want to say for the record that this exam is a bunch of B.S. All you tell you why. I took this test like a cuople weeks after I finished my CCNP/CCDP just to see where I stand and what I need to hit for this thing. Let me say that the CCIE exam 350-001 is highly overraded. So I scored a modest 60% the first time. Not bad for not really studying and just going off of experience and Theory. The problem I have is after studying for what I needed and knowing that I was going to tear this test a new A-hole I went in took the test and did everything the same except in the questionaire that I filled out I marked that I was proficient in alot more areas than I did the first time. The result well after blazing through the test in an hour and feeling DAMN confident that I got at least a 90% on the sucker I ended up getting a 58%. I WAS LIVID I was like what the hell??? I got ROBBED!!! I only missed honestly like 5 questions. I can recite the whole damn test in my sleep! I don't understand! I am so dman fustrated I can't even see straight. Why am I writing this? Well I want to know do they gauge or do anything weird with what you mark for what are you are proficient in, in the questionnaire in the beginning of the test Like weighingthe questions differently the second time around or something weird like that... Somebody tell me PS. The Exam Cram for the exam is excellent as usual. -- Shannon Severijn CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Snot-Nosed Gen. X Punk Kid... (Cisco Mercenary) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Booting In Bootrom with the TFTP command (Urgent)
Hi, The 2500 does not do xmodem. If when in boot mode you cannot erase the flash manually it is either knackered or there is also the possibility that the main-board jumper for the flash has been set to write-protect. Fwom the message that you are getting, I would check this. HTH Andy Lennon CCDP, CCNP, MCSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 August 2000 21:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Booting In Bootrom with the TFTP command (Urgent) Hi, It seems like your image is corrupted and you lost the ability to load it my suggestion is load it with XMODEM if you need the procedure send me an E-mail and I will get it for you. GIL CCNA,CCDA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 6:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Booting In Bootrom with the TFTP command (Urgent) Scenario: A Cisco 2500 series router boots in bootrom mode, has serial link connectivity, but no images found in flash. Flash is presently in RO mode. We attempt to bring the IOS onto the box, but fail. We believe the flash is fubarred. Any attempts to tftp fail w/ "not programmable" We believe that this is due to the RO limitaion of the present flash memory. There is the limitation of the 2500 series where the image is run from flash, not NVRAM. Is our presumption correct about the corrupt Flash module? Excerpt from techs worklog. I had the site console into the router and remove the aaa new-model settings. I was then able to telnet into the router via the s0 interface. The router was in boot mode. I checked the flash and there wasn't an image there. I tried to TFTP a new image over but I got and error message (ERR: Device in READ-ONLY state) so I believe that the flash was damaged by the lightning hit. I inserted a "boot system tftp" command into the config so the router could use the IOS image from site. I reloaded the router. I can't telnet to it anymore, but I can ping the serial. on site the TFTP-server process is using 2.34% of the cpu, so it appears to be sending the image over. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the NSC Group. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WICs
WIC's are NOT hot-swappable, but port adapters are 7200's are. On 7500's port adapters connected via VIP cards are not hot swappable either (even if they are not screwed in). Andy Lennon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim O'Brien Sent: 11 August 2000 12:29 To: McCallum, Robert; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WICs That depends on the router, on the 7206VXR's that I run the modules are hot pluggable and ready upon insertion. Tim - Original Message - From: "McCallum, Robert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 4:01 AM Subject: RE: WICs It is a very simple job. BUT although it is hot swappable (in the sense you can plug it in while the router is still running) it will not burst into life until the router is rebooted. -Original Message- From: Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2000 16:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WICs Is installing a WIC and/or memory in routers typically a simple job or a tedious, drawn-out process? I guess I'm looking for the horror stories... Rob Montgomery CCNA MCP IA Systems Analyst Sytex, Inc./ Naval Special Warfare Command ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of the NSC Group. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Follies Extended Through Saturday
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: 05 August 2000 11:21 To: Cisco Mail List; Kane Subject: RE: Friday Follies Extended Through Saturday Interesting. I have now removed the access-list that was applied inbound to the port in question. FYI the access-list was access-list 101 permit tcp any host 64.220.150.9 eq telnet Said list would most definitely have denied your trace. And all the pings folks told me failed. The access-list, at the time of removal, indicated 1200 hits or so, Might want to try again. I tested telnet access from here, but of course I'm on the inside. :- Sorry for the problem. Chuck -Original Message- From: Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:23 PM To: Chuck Larrieu Subject:Re: Friday Follies Extended Through Saturday I 've taken up your challenge , but after a number of unsuccessful attempts Again I extend the invitation. Telnet to 64.220.150.9 password "yahoudi" ( no quotes ) See if you can answer the following questions: 1) what version of IOS is running? enterprise/fw plus ipsec56 12.1.2 2) What is the name of the IOS image? c2500-jos56i-l.121-2.bin 3) What routing protocols are running? ip eigrp ipx rip 4) Are there any other routers connected? If so, on what ports? 2500 on s0 to s0 5) If there are other routers connected, what IOS versions are they running? same as the other one What are the names of the flash images on those routers, if there are routers? c2500-jos56i-l.121-2.bin 6) Provide every detail you can about any WAN protocols running frame-relay ip and ipx with ip eigrp and ipx rip 7) What is the privilege level password? 8) What model number router are you telneted into? 2501 - 2s and 1e (if there was a bri it would be a 2503) 9) What model number routers are connected, if there are any connected? 2501 and two others, one on the far end and one acting as a fr switch 10) Who played the Cisco Kid? ( extra credit - how did you find that answer? ) DuncanReynaldo 11) Extra Extra credit - identify all security enabled on the router Hint: book answers don't count. All that matters is what you can determine through your telnet session. I guarantee that you cannot answer at least four of the questions without looking. So come on in! Chuck -- I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx-Brain_dumps-xX are futile. Your life as it has been is over ( if you hope to pass ) From this time forward, you will study US! ( apologies to the folks at Star Trek TNG ) ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF !!!
The best route is actually determined by the longest prefix match Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atif Awan Sent: 14 June 2000 22:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF !!! Priority does not affect route selection; it is only for the DR election process in OSPF. Cost does affect route selection. OSPF determines the best route to a destination based upon the metric called cost. By default cost is calculated using the formula : Cost = 10exp8/ bandwidth of the interface ( i think so :) ) You need to set the correct bandwidth for serial links using the bandwidth command. Make sure you understand that the bandwidth command is just an informational command that tells the different routing protocols about the actual bandwidth of an interface. This command has nothing to do with the data transmission rate. Regards Atif Awan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 9:22 PM Subject: OSPF !!! Hello everyone! I have a bit of confusion with how to route selection occurs in OSPF by icluding the following commands Please shade some light on this Ok here comes does cost and priority affects route selection ?? 1. router ospf 3 network 158.13.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 default-information originate default-metric 1 distance 85 ip ospf cost 10 ip ospf priority 4 2 router ospf 3 network 158.13.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 default-information originate default-metric 1 distance 85 ip ospf cost 20 ip ospf priority 5 Thanks, Elias Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Token ring question
knackered media/mau, both router say the naum is shot. try new ports on the mau, check for good connections etc. Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of m. jean stockton Sent: 10 June 2000 13:07 To: Matt Shell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Token ring question I am very new at this but I do not see your 'no shut' command. Makeeda -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Shell Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 12:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Token ring question I have two 2502s plugged into an IBM 8228 MSAU in a lab. They are connected with a 9 pin to Type 1 cable. For some reason, I can't get the line to come up. When I do "show interface", I see the TokenRing0 as "initializing" and "down". I wait a second and it goes to "down" / "down", then back to "initialize" / "down". I admit, I don't know much about Token Ring, but this should be fairly straight forward, right? On each router config I have: RouterA: ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0 ring-speed 16 ! RouterB: ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 192.168.30.2 255.255.255.0 ring-speed 16 ! When I do "debug token events" I get this output on both routers: %TR-3-OPENFAIL: Unit 0, open failed: Phys. Insertion, ring beaconing %TR-3-BADSTART: Unit 0, Start completion and wrong idb state - state= 0 TR0: reset from 30559AE TR0: txtmr: 0x0, msclk: 0x146EF494, qt: 0 (0ms) starting. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for the help! Matt ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The survey at the beginning of exams
Hi all, you may notice that one of the questions on the survey is about who you work for. This is what determines your pass mark. Higher for Cisco employees and the standard pass mark for all others. That is all there is to it. HTH Andrew Lennon, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: General Theory
1 and 0, don't need anything else for computing as it all stems from there! regs, Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil Barker Sent: 14 June 2000 03:32 To: tazar Ing; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: General Theory 42 is about as close as you can get. --- tazar Ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have been with this group about half year now, heard and learn about cisco router, term likes active router, backup router, priority etc is there any general theory that can group every thing together ??? Thks/Brgds Tazar Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT for ISPs
On the subject of IP adressing, what about the 64.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255 block ? Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: 07 June 2000 16:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT for ISPs Howard, I seem to remember @home trying to base their network on RFC 1918 addressing, and then petitioning for a Class "A" after they ran into problems with users that were trying to play games across the Internet. It seems that many games rely on a unique IP address to identify users. Does this sound familiar to you? Irwin Multiplayer games, and some streaming applications, are MAJOR problems for NAT. They tend to have special-purpose multicast protocol functions, and they need to know addresses in order to rendezvous. The @home, and the cable industry in general, is a bit more complex. As you know, carriers justify address space based on actual customers and 3-month projections. The cable industry asked for a huge block, and the addressing authorities said they didn't have customers. In response, the industry said that they had millions of real customers, just not IP customers. They did, however, have the theory "build it and they will come." On appeal, the decision was to grant a specific block for the cable industry, 24.0.0.0 (I think it initially was a /14), so the utilization could be tracked. At present, the ARIN assumption is that 7 percent of cable customers will use IP service. ARIN will grant more than 7 percent if usage can be documented. -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NAT for ISPs Current IP address allocation from ARIN assumes that ISPs will use private addressing and NAT for single-homed customers. They are reasonable about exceptions, such as protocols that won't work through NAT, but the exceptions need to be justified for the ISP to continue getting address space. If the customer is multihomed to more than one ISP, the requirements for coordinating NATs among them are accepted to be impossible. Multihoming alone, however, does not justify provider-independent address space. I am a newbie I would hazard a guess that, for an ISP(assuming thousands of users) to do address translation would be a large technical feat, consuming more Hardware and other resources than the savings on registered IP addresses could justify Please correct me if I am wrong Tayta [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear All, Anybody here who work for ISP that use NATed/PATed address for their clients? Is it appropriate for ISP to use NAT/PAT? Thanks Reden ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I NEED HELP!! OSPF-Frame Relay-VoIP Problems
See inline -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonardo Silva - Tecnologia Sent: 12 May 2000 13:48 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: "I NEED HELP!!" OSPF-Frame Relay-VoIP Problems Group, I sent this message and didn't get any reply. I really don't have a clue what the problem is. Hello Everyone! I ran into a problem this week. I have a frame relay link running with static routes. Ahh FR and OSPF I configured OSPF without taking out the static routes. I also have VoIP running in this link and after I configured OSPF it stopped working. This is a routing problem as you have done nothing but added a routing protocol. It had all routes it needed and I didn't take out the static routes. After I removed OSPF commands it worked again! See above I think you have longer prefix matches on OSPF than Static Routes. Longer matches ALWAYS take preference. To solve, make your static routes more specific than your ospf by either changing your wildcards in the ospf statements or changing your your static satements to be more specific than ospf's You may also want to investigate OSPF NBMA (hint)!!! Regards, Andrew Lennon, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE Does anybody know what the problem is? Leo ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
