Re: Cisco Secure
There are a few GNU/Linux developments. http://www.freshmeat.net/ -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ ""Chiao Liang"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 94qtjt$h5u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:94qtjt$h5u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Is there any site that i can get cisco secure demo softeware for NT version. > Is there any othere free Radius Server that i can use for As5300 (Voip) as > well. > > Thank, with regards > Chan > CCDA, CCNA > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure !!!!!
no, you need to buy it ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all.. can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that it is shareversion .can u pleasse tell me the url which points to that location thanks in adv. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure !!!!!
Brad Ellis wrote: > > no, you need to buy it > ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all.. > > can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that it > is shareversion .can u pleasse tell me the url which points to that > location Well, it really depends on what you want to do. I haven't had a chance to play around with CiscoSecure yet, but it apparently requires an Oracle or Sybase installation to maintain RADIUS, TACACS+, and other information. It's designed for large environments with many thousands of entries. If you just need a simple TACACS+ or RADIUS server for a hundred accounts or so, there are plenty of free platforms out there. Just search around. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure !!!!!
One does not need a database product to run CiscoSecure. Although, one does have an option to use one with CiscoSecure. It makes for a nice way to use an AS5x00 with an established NT environment as one can use an NT domain for validating. -Original Message- From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:43 PM To: Brad Ellis Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ! Brad Ellis wrote: > > no, you need to buy it > ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all.. > > can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that it > is shareversion .can u pleasse tell me the url which points to that > location Well, it really depends on what you want to do. I haven't had a chance to play around with CiscoSecure yet, but it apparently requires an Oracle or Sybase installation to maintain RADIUS, TACACS+, and other information. It's designed for large environments with many thousands of entries. If you just need a simple TACACS+ or RADIUS server for a hundred accounts or so, there are plenty of free platforms out there. Just search around. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure !!!!!
yeah ! I did it. With SQL Server database too. Henrique Issamu Terada CPM Comunicações - Brazil CCNA Certified - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 7:15 AM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ! > One does not need a database product to run CiscoSecure. Although, one does > have an option to use one with CiscoSecure. It makes for a nice way to use > an AS5x00 with an established NT environment as one can use an NT domain for > validating. > > -Original Message- > From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:43 PM > To: Brad Ellis > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ! > > > Brad Ellis wrote: > > > > no, you need to buy it > > ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi all.. > > > > can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that it > > is shareversion .can u pleasse tell me the url which points to that > > location > > > > Well, it really depends on what you want to do. I haven't had a chance > to play around with CiscoSecure yet, but it apparently requires an > Oracle or Sybase installation to maintain RADIUS, TACACS+, and other > information. It's designed for large environments with many thousands > of entries. If you just need a simple TACACS+ or RADIUS server for a > hundred accounts or so, there are plenty of free platforms out there. > Just search around. > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure !!!!!
FYI, I found the answer I was looking for. For Unix, you HAVE to use some kind of database backend. If you don't own a database product that it support (Sybase or Oracle), you have to use Sybase SQL Anywhere, a small Sybase compatible product that ships with CiscoSecure and supports no more then 5000 entries. David Henrique Issamu Terada wrote: > > yeah ! I did it. > > With SQL Server database too. > > Henrique Issamu Terada > CPM Comunicações - Brazil > CCNA Certified > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 7:15 AM > Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ! > > > One does not need a database product to run CiscoSecure. Although, one > does > > have an option to use one with CiscoSecure. It makes for a nice way to > use > > an AS5x00 with an established NT environment as one can use an NT domain > for > > validating. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:43 PM > > To: Brad Ellis > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ! > > > > > > Brad Ellis wrote: > > > > > > no, you need to buy it > > > ""skt"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > 000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:000301bfcfbd$5f917500$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi all.. > > > > > > can any one tell me about cisco secure i have heard about it, that > it > > > is shareversion .can u pleasse tell me the url which points to that > > > location > > > > > > > > Well, it really depends on what you want to do. I haven't had a chance > > to play around with CiscoSecure yet, but it apparently requires an > > Oracle or Sybase installation to maintain RADIUS, TACACS+, and other > > information. It's designed for large environments with many thousands > > of entries. If you just need a simple TACACS+ or RADIUS server for a > > hundred accounts or so, there are plenty of free platforms out there. > > Just search around. > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ___ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco secure policy manager
Will not work with 2000 Regards, Manny Colon Computer Services Information Builders Inc. ML wrote: > Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it worked. > > THanks, > ML > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco secure policy manager
Any particular reason why? I am not sure what you mean, wont install, wont run as in function? I know Cisco says they dont support it on 2000 but that is different than wont work. Thanks, ML Manny Colon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Will not work with 2000 > > Regards, > > Manny Colon > Computer Services > Information Builders Inc. > > > ML wrote: > > > Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it worked. > > > > THanks, > > ML > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco secure policy manager
Hi It won't install, comes back with something like "Requires NT 4 or Higher" what a laugh! -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I ""ML"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96hqpe$dmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96hqpe$dmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Any particular reason why? I am not sure what you mean, wont install, wont > run as in function? I know Cisco says they dont support it on 2000 but that > is different than wont work. > > Thanks, > ML > > > Manny Colon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Will not work with 2000 > > > > Regards, > > > > Manny Colon > > Computer Services > > Information Builders Inc. > > > > > > ML wrote: > > > > > Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it > worked. > > > > > > THanks, > > > ML > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco secure policy manager
Win2000 will be supported in ver 2.3 which should be out shortly. It is in beta now... Tim ""John Hardman"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96i2jb$4j4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96i2jb$4j4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi It won't install, comes back with something like "Requires NT 4 or Higher" what a laugh! -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I ""ML"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96hqpe$dmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96hqpe$dmc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Any particular reason why? I am not sure what you mean, wont install, wont > run as in function? I know Cisco says they dont support it on 2000 but that > is different than wont work. > > Thanks, > ML > > > Manny Colon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Will not work with 2000 > > > > Regards, > > > > Manny Colon > > Computer Services > > Information Builders Inc. > > > > > > ML wrote: > > > > > Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it > worked. > > > > > > THanks, > > > ML > > > > > > _ > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco secure policy manager
Is CSPM better as compared to Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System = (IDS)?We are considering these too using price & functionality = points of view, which has superior basic functionality.With IDS, we = have to have HP openview which we don't have now (additional cost). = Any good suggestions? syson toronto =20 "Manny Colon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message = [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Will not work with 2000 >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Manny Colon > Computer Services > Information Builders Inc. >=20 >=20 > ML wrote: >=20 > > Anyone try running CSPM on a Windows 2000 box. Let me know how it = worked. > > > > THanks, > > ML > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: = http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 > -- >=20 >=20 >=20 > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: = http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Actually, the version I was trying was 1.1, which is the "latest and greatest" for connecting to a PIX. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client If this is the client for the VPN 3000 series, there is not a release that is compatible with Win2k yet. Look for it in March. It is still in beta. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of VanHaaren, Nicole Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Nicole, The supplied VPN client won't run on W2K, You'll have to apply for the beta version which is working fine for me so far. Andy -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject:Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN Client
The Cisco VPN client doesn't work with win2k; however, the company that wrote the client software for Cisco also puts out a product call safe-net (www.ire.com) that will work with win2k. It is almost identical to the Cisco client. I believe that it costs 75$ per seat. Cisco isn't coming out with a client that will work with win2k until March. - Original Message - From: "VanHaaren, Nicole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "VanHaaren, Nicole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:44 PM Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client > Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with > Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my > computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with > other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO > regarding compatability with Win2000. > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. > Nicole > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN Client
If your talking about the client that goes with the VPN 3000 then the Cisco software will not work with win2k as Rick pointed out. I just implemented this for a client using win2k and the solution is to use PPTP that is built into win2k instead of IPSEC. I created a white paper on this and it works perfectly. It's how I telnet to the routers and switches for this client from home:)... E-mail me off-line if your interested. Regards -- Original Message -- From: "Rick Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Rick Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:31:27 -0500 >The Cisco VPN client doesn't work with win2k; however, the company that >wrote the client software for Cisco also puts out a product call safe-net >(www.ire.com) that will work with win2k. It is almost identical to the Cisco >client. I believe that it costs 75$ per seat. Cisco isn't coming out with a >client that will work with win2k until March. > >- Original Message - >From: "VanHaaren, Nicole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "VanHaaren, Nicole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:44 PM >Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client > > >> Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with >> Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my >> computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with >> other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO >> regarding compatability with Win2000. >> >> Thanks in advance for any suggestions. >> Nicole >> >> _ >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that does make a client for Win 2000 and Cisco, but I have never tried it and forget who it is. If you want to run an IPSEC tunnel from a win2000 machine to a Cisco device you have to do it through an l2tp tunnel. Set that up first and then run IPSEC over it. I believe Win2000 has all the components you need to do this on disk. -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Ok, so I have searched CCO, but can't find info on the beta anywhereanyone have any idea how I can get my hands on this? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client Nicole, The supplied VPN client won't run on W2K, You'll have to apply for the beta version which is working fine for me so far. Andy -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject:Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Cisco does make a client but it is in beta testing right now. I have used it and it seems to run just fine. But they say that it is still too buggy to release it, so I am not sure when they plan on releasing it. -Original Message- From: Christopher Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:57 AM To: 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that does make a client for Win 2000 and Cisco, but I have never tried it and forget who it is. If you want to run an IPSEC tunnel from a win2000 machine to a Cisco device you have to do it through an l2tp tunnel. Set that up first and then run IPSEC over it. I believe Win2000 has all the components you need to do this on disk. -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
They have told me that it will be out in March. Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oledrews.com/ccnp NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: Soucy, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:05 AM To: 'Christopher Larson'; 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client Cisco does make a client but it is in beta testing right now. I have used it and it seems to run just fine. But they say that it is still too buggy to release it, so I am not sure when they plan on releasing it. -Original Message- From: Christopher Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:57 AM To: 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that does make a client for Win 2000 and Cisco, but I have never tried it and forget who it is. If you want to run an IPSEC tunnel from a win2000 machine to a Cisco device you have to do it through an l2tp tunnel. Set that up first and then run IPSEC over it. I believe Win2000 has all the components you need to do this on disk. -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
You need to have at least service pack 1 installed on the 2000 machine or it will not work. I currently use the Cisco VPN 5000 client, and it works just fine. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of VanHaaren, Nicole Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 5:46 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client Ok, so I have searched CCO, but can't find info on the beta anywhereanyone have any idea how I can get my hands on this? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client Nicole, The supplied VPN client won't run on W2K, You'll have to apply for the beta version which is working fine for me so far. Andy -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject:Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client
Hi all, If you want to run IPSEC tunnel on WIN2000 platform, there is a company that is called IRE which makes the VPN client software and they have the version for the WIN200 for the WINME and a bug free version. I have tried it and it work excellent. Gil -Original Message- From: Christopher Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ??? 12 ? 2001 15:57 To: 'VanHaaren, Nicole'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client The VPN client does not run on 2000. There is a third party company that does make a client for Win 2000 and Cisco, but I have never tried it and forget who it is. If you want to run an IPSEC tunnel from a win2000 machine to a Cisco device you have to do it through an l2tp tunnel. Set that up first and then run IPSEC over it. I believe Win2000 has all the components you need to do this on disk. -Original Message- From: VanHaaren, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: VanHaaren, Nicole Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client Has anyone tried using this product? It seems like it will not work with Windows 2000... I am getting an error when I try to run setup.exe on my computer. Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround? Maybe a site with other vpn client software? I can't find a patch or any other info on CCO regarding compatability with Win2000. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Nicole _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco secure VPN client
It's not free any more. "...to hell with what other people think, I'm ridin' my own broom!" L. M. Cynthia Bridgett, raised in SE DC and proud of it! CCNA, MCSE, CNE, CNA, MCP, A+ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Wells Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 6:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco secure VPN client Hey Folks, I seem to remember Cisco offering their CiscoSecure VPN Client for free to use with the Firewall Feature Set, a while back. I just went to CCO to download it and I can no longer find it. Have they stopped giving this away lately? Cheers _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN client
I'd guess at just having to delete the "=". I believe that normally specifies 'spare', so you wouldn't need another copy of the software. Please let me know if this turns out to be incorrect. Regards, Gareth ""Ken Yeo"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8qqu55$apm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qqu55$apm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone knows the product number for the software? > > I have VPN-SW-DES-100= but it is just the license. > > TIA. > Ken > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN client
Good point, I always wonder what does the = sign means. I will let the group knows when I find out the result. Thanks! Ken ""Gareth Hinton"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8qra2a$oeu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qra2a$oeu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'd guess at just having to delete the "=". > I believe that normally specifies 'spare', so you wouldn't need another copy > of the software. > Please let me know if this turns out to be incorrect. > > Regards, > > Gareth > > ""Ken Yeo"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 8qqu55$apm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8qqu55$apm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Anyone knows the product number for the software? > > > > I have VPN-SW-DES-100= but it is just the license. > > > > TIA. > > Ken > > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN client
Ken, I'm not sure about a part number, but it is downloadable from CCO - http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/vpnclient-crypto watch the wrap. Chuck Church CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer Magnacom Technologies 140 N. Rt. 303 Valley Cottage, NY 10989 845-267-4000 x218 >Anyone knows the product number for the software? >I have VPN-SW-DES-100= but it is just the license. >TIA. >Ken **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN client
Title: RE: Cisco Secure VPN client Here ya go... VPN-SW-DES-100= D -Original Message- From: Ken Yeo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure VPN client Anyone knows the product number for the software? I have VPN-SW-DES-100= but it is just the license. TIA. Ken **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam
Hi All !
Could anybody pointout thegood site for SNMP.
"J. Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/10/2000 09:32:17 PM
Please respond to "J. Wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Abdul Mateen/Satyam)
Subject: Re: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam
243 Problems / 180 minutes
Keep the MCNS 2.0 track,
lots fill-blank,
lots drap-drop,
not easy.
On 10 Sep 2000 09:36:15 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("chung") wrote:
>Hello!!
>
>I will take the Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam tomorrow!! Could anyone give
>me some advice? Which topic should I focus?
>
>Thanks a lot!!
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco secure questions [7:15231]
A very good information on CSV log on cisco site you need to have CCO access to view this page http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_soft/csacs4nt/csnt23/csnt23ug/logging.htm Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15281&t=15231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam
243 Problems / 180 minutes
Keep the MCNS 2.0 track,
lots fill-blank,
lots drap-drop,
not easy.
On 10 Sep 2000 09:36:15 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("chung") wrote:
>Hello!!
>
>I will take the Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam tomorrow!! Could anyone give
>me some advice? Which topic should I focus?
>
>Thanks a lot!!
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>
>**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
>_
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam
I took this exam on the 1st, Sept and all I've got to say is know "Security" The test covered everything from PIX, Cisco Secure, IOS Firewall Feature Set, IPSEC, IKE, CA, VPN client, and cisco tools for implementation. The test was the normal 3 hours and loaded with 243 questions, I must admit at one time I felt like simply walking out on the test. The same questions was asked over and over with slightly different twist. Overall, the test wasn't bad... just a lot of questions. Some were type in the command but not much. Good luck on this exam. I'll just say this test was designed for the folks that work on the *equipment* all the time. HTH Nigel. - Original Message - From: chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 2:33 PM Subject: Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam > Hello!! > > I will take the Cisco Secure VPN BETA exam tomorrow!! Could anyone give > me some advice? Which topic should I focus? > > Thanks a lot!! > > Regards, > Tony > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:57775]
There is no default username and password. What you need to do is be on the server you installed it on and point your web browser to 127.0.0.1:2002 this will put you right into the administrators screen from there you add the usernames and passwords. To add an administrator so you can administer this box from across the network go to administrator control button then add a admin. That should do it. -Original Message- From: Ciaron Gogarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:57775] Does anybody know the default username and password for a vanilla install of Cisco Secure ACS for Windows version 3.0?? I'm being prompted for a username and password to login, but can't find one in the documentation. I tried the password recovery procedure, but there are no adminstrators created yet... help needed and appreciated. Thanks in advance CG ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone + 353 1 4093000 fax + 353 1 4093001 ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57787&t=57775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work, the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030 concentrators this did not work and we were told by TAC that Radius with Expiry with 2.6 ACS would not work but this was fixed in version 3.0. We upgraded to 3.0 and haven't looked back nice product CISCO way to go. Just for others interested so you do not travel the same hard road but FUNK Radius Steel belted did not support the changing of passwords because they did not know how to pass the right attirbutes back to the client through the cisco device. I was told by a 3rd level engineer from Funk that they are working on it but finding it hard to work with Microsoft because of some agreement Cisco has with Microsoft but they should have it working 1st qtr of next year. Just FYI for those who care. -Original Message- From: Mahmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] I have a problem with User-Changeable Password in Cisco Secure ACS version 2.6 on my 2000 server. When I get online with my username and want to change my password, It don't let me, and give me a "Login Failed" error. But if I change the Max Sessions to 2 ot higher, ev ery thing work fine. What's the problem? Any help would be appreciated. Mahmood Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58136&t=58101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
hi, i upgraded my acs 2.6 to a 3.0 when i read ur mail in reference to changing user passwords. i cant seem to get this working...i cant find attributes 17 and 21 in the acs configuration. any info is highly appreciated. thanks - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:52 PM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work, > the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030 > concentrators this did not work and we were told by TAC that Radius with > Expiry with 2.6 ACS would not work but this was fixed in version 3.0. We > upgraded to 3.0 and haven't looked back nice product CISCO way to go. > Just for others interested so you do not travel the same hard road but > FUNK Radius Steel belted did not support the changing of passwords > because they did not know how to pass the right attirbutes back to the > client through the cisco device. I was told by a 3rd level engineer from > Funk that they are working on it but finding it hard to work with > Microsoft because of some agreement Cisco has with Microsoft but they > should have it working 1st qtr of next year. Just FYI for those who > care. > > -Original Message- > From: Mahmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > > > I have a problem with User-Changeable Password in Cisco Secure ACS > version 2.6 on my 2000 server. When I get online with my username and > want to change my password, It don't let me, and give me a "Login > Failed" error. But if I change the Max Sessions to 2 ot higher, ev ery > thing work fine. What's the problem? > > Any help would be appreciated. > Mahmood Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58450&t=58101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
Exactly what capacity are you using the Radius box in? I use my radius box with a Cisco 3030 concentrator all users logging in via vpn are authenticated against the concentrator. There is nothing special you have to do on the radius box to allow for changing of passwords upon expiration, but on the concentrator you MUST make sure you are set to use Radius with Expiry. -Original Message- From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:38 AM To: Elijah Savage III; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] hi, i upgraded my acs 2.6 to a 3.0 when i read ur mail in reference to changing user passwords. i cant seem to get this working...i cant find attributes 17 and 21 in the acs configuration. any info is highly appreciated. thanks - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:52 PM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work, > the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030 > concentrators this did not work and we were told by TAC that Radius > with Expiry with 2.6 ACS would not work but this was fixed in version > 3.0. We upgraded to 3.0 and haven't looked back nice product CISCO way > to go. Just for others interested so you do not travel the same hard > road but FUNK Radius Steel belted did not support the changing of > passwords because they did not know how to pass the right attirbutes > back to the client through the cisco device. I was told by a 3rd level > engineer from Funk that they are working on it but finding it hard to > work with Microsoft because of some agreement Cisco has with Microsoft > but they should have it working 1st qtr of next year. Just FYI for > those who care. > > -Original Message- > From: Mahmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > > > I have a problem with User-Changeable Password in Cisco Secure ACS > version 2.6 on my 2000 server. When I get online with my username and > want to change my password, It don't let me, and give me a "Login > Failed" error. But if I change the Max Sessions to 2 ot higher, ev ery > thing work fine. What's the problem? > > Any help would be appreciated. > Mahmood Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58467&t=58101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
The radius server is used to authenticate windows dial-up users using broadband. I want the radius acct password to expire so that the user can change it themselves without help from the administrator. - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: "Tunde Kalejaiye" ; Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] Exactly what capacity are you using the Radius box in? I use my radius box with a Cisco 3030 concentrator all users logging in via vpn are authenticated against the concentrator. There is nothing special you have to do on the radius box to allow for changing of passwords upon expiration, but on the concentrator you MUST make sure you are set to use Radius with Expiry. -Original Message- From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:38 AM To: Elijah Savage III; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] hi, i upgraded my acs 2.6 to a 3.0 when i read ur mail in reference to changing user passwords. i cant seem to get this working...i cant find attributes 17 and 21 in the acs configuration. any info is highly appreciated. thanks - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:52 PM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work, > the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030 > concentrators this did not work and we were told by TAC that Radius > with Expiry with 2.6 ACS would not work but this was fixed in version > 3.0. We upgraded to 3.0 and haven't looked back nice product CISCO way > to go. Just for others interested so you do not travel the same hard > road but FUNK Radius Steel belted did not support the changing of > passwords because they did not know how to pass the right attirbutes > back to the client through the cisco device. I was told by a 3rd level > engineer from Funk that they are working on it but finding it hard to > work with Microsoft because of some agreement Cisco has with Microsoft > but they should have it working 1st qtr of next year. Just FYI for > those who care. > > -Original Message- > From: Mahmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > > > I have a problem with User-Changeable Password in Cisco Secure ACS > version 2.6 on my 2000 server. When I get online with my username and > want to change my password, It don't let me, and give me a "Login > Failed" error. But if I change the Max Sessions to 2 ot higher, ev ery > thing work fine. What's the problem? > > Any help would be appreciated. > Mahmood Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58544&t=58101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101]
What are the users vpn into it has to be a pix or 3030 or router, what are you using to terminate the vpn connections since they are broadband. Let me know and I will try to send you a config for that device to make this possible. -Original Message- From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:55 AM To: Elijah Savage III; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] The radius server is used to authenticate windows dial-up users using broadband. I want the radius acct password to expire so that the user can change it themselves without help from the administrator. - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: "Tunde Kalejaiye" ; Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] Exactly what capacity are you using the Radius box in? I use my radius box with a Cisco 3030 concentrator all users logging in via vpn are authenticated against the concentrator. There is nothing special you have to do on the radius box to allow for changing of passwords upon expiration, but on the concentrator you MUST make sure you are set to use Radius with Expiry. -Original Message- From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:38 AM To: Elijah Savage III; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] hi, i upgraded my acs 2.6 to a 3.0 when i read ur mail in reference to changing user passwords. i cant seem to get this working...i cant find attributes 17 and 21 in the acs configuration. any info is highly appreciated. thanks - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:52 PM Subject: RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > I had this same issue a while back but at least you got yours to work, > the max sessions I think was just coincidence. Because with our 3030 > concentrators this did not work and we were told by TAC that Radius > with Expiry with 2.6 ACS would not work but this was fixed in version > 3.0. We upgraded to 3.0 and haven't looked back nice product CISCO way > to go. Just for others interested so you do not travel the same hard > road but FUNK Radius Steel belted did not support the changing of > passwords because they did not know how to pass the right attirbutes > back to the client through the cisco device. I was told by a 3rd level > engineer from Funk that they are working on it but finding it hard to > work with Microsoft because of some agreement Cisco has with Microsoft > but they should have it working 1st qtr of next year. Just FYI for > those who care. > > -Original Message- > From: Mahmood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:58101] > > > I have a problem with User-Changeable Password in Cisco Secure ACS > version 2.6 on my 2000 server. When I get online with my username and > want to change my password, It don't let me, and give me a "Login > Failed" error. But if I change the Max Sessions to 2 ot higher, ev ery > thing work fine. What's the problem? > > Any help would be appreciated. > Mahmood Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58545&t=58101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure ACS Server [7:33415]
I know you can have a maximum of 16 groups and a maximum of 16 servers in each group bring the total of allowable servers to 256. Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Joel Satterley To: Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:50 AM Subject: Cisco Secure ACS Server [7:33415] > Anyone know what (if any) limitations there are on the amount of replication > servers you can have/configure are with ACS v2.6 and above ? > > Joel. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33432&t=33415 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure - ISDN error [7:64577]
Not 100% sure if this is a full authentiaction error, but am alarmed by the protocol=cdp section. I would guess that your dial list doesn't allow CDP ??/ Just a thought # Ants wrote: > > Hi, > we have an ISDN dial in site setup and getting following error > every couple > of minutes.. > this site belongs to a group which consist of multiple dialin > sites.. all > working ok. this site however not working although setup same > as the other > ones..but the scary thing is it logs into our network > intermittently... and > the Cisco secure logs shows the following errors... > any ideas what these error messages coupld mean? > thanks in advance... > > > Date Time Message-Type User-Name Group-Name Caller-ID > Authen-Failure-Code Author-Failure-Code Author-Data NAS-Port > NAS-IP-Address > 03/05/2003 14:15:11 Author failed TYL01RB001 ISDN SITES > isdn Service > denied service=ppp protocol=cdp Serial1/0:14 X.X.X.X > 03/05/2003 14:13:21 Author failed TYL01RB001 ISDN SITES > isdn Service > denied service=ppp protocol=cdp Serial1/0:12 X.X.X.X > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64593&t=64577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure - ISDN error [7:64577]
added 'no cdp enable' to my dialer ineterface and all seems to be working ok now. many thanks ""Troy Leliard"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Not 100% sure if this is a full authentiaction error, but am alarmed by the > protocol=cdp section. I would guess that your dial list doesn't allow CDP ??/ > > Just a thought > # > Ants wrote: > > > > Hi, > > we have an ISDN dial in site setup and getting following error > > every couple > > of minutes.. > > this site belongs to a group which consist of multiple dialin > > sites.. all > > working ok. this site however not working although setup same > > as the other > > ones..but the scary thing is it logs into our network > > intermittently... and > > the Cisco secure logs shows the following errors... > > any ideas what these error messages coupld mean? > > thanks in advance... > > > > > > Date Time Message-Type User-Name Group-Name Caller-ID > > Authen-Failure-Code Author-Failure-Code Author-Data NAS-Port > > NAS-IP-Address > > 03/05/2003 14:15:11 Author failed TYL01RB001 ISDN SITES > > isdn Service > > denied service=ppp protocol=cdp Serial1/0:14 X.X.X.X > > 03/05/2003 14:13:21 Author failed TYL01RB001 ISDN SITES > > isdn Service > > denied service=ppp protocol=cdp Serial1/0:12 X.X.X.X Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64704&t=64577 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN version??? [7:45774]
Hi It should be 1.0/1.1 fahim ""Shoaib Waqar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi guys, > > Can anybody tell me that which version of Cisco Secure > VPN client (version 1.0/1.1 OR 3.0/3.51) comes in MCNS > exam. I have read the MCNS Cisco press book but i > could not find enough material. Later, I was just > seeing the Course Outline and found the objectives: > > Confguring the Cisco secure VPN Client > --- > 1. Install the Cisco secure VPN client > 2. Configure the Cisco secure VPN client > 3. Operate the Cisco secure VPN client in a VPN > Session > 4. Request and import CA Certificates > > Any sort of help will be highly appreciated. Can > anybody tell me which topic to focus on and how much > deep we should go in it?? > > Thanks > Shoaib > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45789&t=45774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN 642-511 [7:73919]
Assorted comments in line. --On 12 August 2003 13:45 + "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > > You should have six weeks to go through it. I'd > suggest taking a day off or spending a Saturday to go through the whole > course, but that's just me. I can't do the one hour here and there thing. Hmmm, you should try running through the knowledgenet course after work in the evening, then heading back into the office at midnight and configuring your first concentrator before 8:30am when people start arriving for their days work. That wasnt fun :-) > > They also include "labs" or simulations of setting up the hardware. > However, they don't have an actual lab. I think they are working on that, > but I found it very useful to have a "real" 3000 available to go through > the menus. > Yep. > I have a side question myself. Cisco changed their specialist program, so > that now apparently there isn't a Firewall Specialist, VPN Specialist, and > IDS Specialist, but rather just one Security Specialist. So does that > mean that I can't use the "VPN Specialist" designation anymore and have > to wait until I pass all of the tests? What about that INFOSEC > designation, is that still valid? > I think you have things in reverse. The Security specialist cert is being / has been retired. The three new specialist exams and CCSP replaced it. If you are interested, I expressed my opinion on that change in some detail (either on this list or security ie dot com) a while back. (I wasnt very complementary about the new specialist certs) Regards Peter Walker CC[NID]P, CISSP, CSS1, etc (yeah, my current employer is a reseller) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73937&t=73919 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco Secure VPN 642-511 [7:73919]
I'm for the check CCO part of your post. Visit http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le30/le13/learning_learning_path.html and you'll see all the Specialist certifications. They are not going anywhere - yet. The CCSP is still going strong: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le2/le37/le54/learning_certification_type_home.html on the same page is an INFOSEC Professional link. Cisco has been granted rights to award this cert. It is NOT a Cisco cert. Which is cool because once it is awarded there is no need to recertify, it is permanent. Which is opposite to everything Cisco does - especially CCSP - to recert CCSP you have to take all 5 exams again. Hopefully by the time people get 3 years in CCSP Cisco will have a single recert exam like they do for CCIE/CCDP/CCNP I might do the security exams once to get the INFOSEC cert and then forget the recert on the Cisco stuff. If you get the CCSP you'll also have the credits to be a Firewall Spec, IDS Spec and a VPN Spec. It would make for a crowded business card. The specs are good for 2 years, the CCSP is good for 3 years. Which is also weird as you used the specs to get CCSP but they expire first. I'm sure there are "good" reasons for these certification oddities. Kevin Wigle CCDP CCNP MCSE CBE Security+ - Original Message - From: "Reimer, Fred" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Cisco Secure VPN 642-511 [7:73919] > Change of subject, and a massive trim. > > The KnowledgeNet course was good. I took the "Express" "with Mentor." > Contrary to their recommendations, I didn't see much value in their mentors. > Not to say that they are not knowledgeable or anything, just that 90% of the > time my "questions" for the mentors were corrections in the Cisco > courseware. The course was for the new test. I believe there were a few > questions on the test that were not covered in the course. > > You get the Cisco courseware documentation, and access to their on-line > power-point type slides with an instructor basically saying the same thing > as is in the courseware. However, they do talk about some things that are > not in the manuals. You should have six weeks to go through it. I'd > suggest taking a day off or spending a Saturday to go through the whole > course, but that's just me. I can't do the one hour here and there thing. > > They also include "labs" or simulations of setting up the hardware. > However, they don't have an actual lab. I think they are working on that, > but I found it very useful to have a "real" 3000 available to go through the > menus. > > If you haven't taken this test before, don't skip the practice thing in the > beginning. One of the simulations worked a bit differently than I was > expecting, and although I'm sure I knew what I was doing I'm not sure if I > got credit for that question. > > Know all the menus, and what items are on the actual configuration screens. > > I have a side question myself. Cisco changed their specialist program, so > that now apparently there isn't a Firewall Specialist, VPN Specialist, and > IDS Specialist, but rather just one Security Specialist. So does that mean > that I can't use the "VPN Specialist" designation anymore and have to wait > until I pass all of the tests? What about that INFOSEC designation, is that > still valid? > > Perhaps I should just login to the new Certifications Community site and > check there. > > http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/CertCom?page=main > > Fred Reimer - CCNA > > > Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 > Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > > NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). > If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please > notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named > recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print > or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. > > > -Original Message- > From: Truman, Michelle, RTSLS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:17 AM > To: Reimer, Fred; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] LITTLE OT: [7:73793] > > Can you comment on that particular Knowledgenet class? I'm signed up to > take it in the not too distant future. > Thanks, > > Michelle > > Michelle Truman CCIE # 8098 > Principal Technical Consultant > AT&T Solutions Center > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Work: 651-998-0949 > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73951&t=73919 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purc
Re: Cisco Secure VPN 642-511 [7:73919]
Just received e-mail from Cisco that they would send me the INFOSEC letter of recognition after I signed the Cisco Certification Agreement. I am spending time on other interesting stuffs which is not Cisco and not sure if I would sit for recert. ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > on the same page is an INFOSEC Professional link. Cisco has been granted > rights to award this cert. It is NOT a Cisco cert. Which is cool because > once it is awarded there is no need to recertify, it is permanent. > > Which is opposite to everything Cisco does - especially CCSP - to recert > CCSP you have to take all 5 exams again. Hopefully by the time people get 3 > years in CCSP Cisco will have a single recert exam like they do for > CCIE/CCDP/CCNP > > I might do the security exams once to get the INFOSEC cert and then forget > the recert on the Cisco stuff. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74180&t=73919 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco Secure ACS v2.4 for Windows NT question
Hi You can not, you will have to rename one of the 16 existant groups For creating groups, you will need ACS for unix Regards > Bulent Sahin wrote: > > Hi > > How can i create a new group on Cisco Secure ACS? > > Thanks, > -- --- Javier Contreras Albesa Standard Trainer PRO IN Training S.L. PROfessional Information Networks World Trade Center, Moll de Barcelona S/N Edif Sur, Planta 4 Phone: (+34) 93-5088850 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (+34) 93-5088860 Internet: http:// www.proin.com SHAPING THE FUTURE - BE PART OF IT! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced exam [7:10842]
What about the MCNS exam ? Did you take it ? What was the documentation you made usage for preparing to the Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced exam ? Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com -Original Message- From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced exam [7:10842] I took the Cisco PIX Firewall Advanced exam this morning and passed it with a minimumscore of 751. The passing score is 751. The exam contains 60 questions and you have 75minutes to complete it. The exam does NOT let you go back to previous questions. Personally, I think this is one of the most rediculous exams that I have taken in sometime. I'veno hand-on experiences with PIX. I just read the documentation from Cisco website in preparing for the exam. The exam also asks about configuring ACS for windows NT (whocares about that)? It is very poorly written. Almost half of the exam concentrate on applications that are running on windows NT (against who cares) and not PIX related questions. If you ask me, I would tell you that a person like myself with no experience in PIX should NOT pass this exam. I would NOT recommend anyone to jump into Cisco CCNP security track unless Cisco completely revamps the whole security certification process. If Cisco keeps doing this, it will certainly dillute the value of the security certification track. Granted that I have been in the networking field for sometime; however, as I've said earlier, I should NOT pass the exam without the PIX hand-on experiences and just two days of preparation. It is NOT right. If anyone else has already taken this exam and have a different opinion, I would love to hearfrom you. Sean Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10850&t=10842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced exam [7:10842]
Did you take the exam expecting to fail? It seems funny that Cisco did not include some of the more elusive PIX configuration problems. I agree that there is a problem with examinations that allow you to suceed without direct experience. But it is important to realise that these exams only certify a minimum standard of knowledge, which is highly desirable. This knowledge combined with experience leads to a more able network engineer who is able to solve problems in complex environments. The aquisition of knowledge is not a simple linear process and if you can use synthesis of your experiences to pass the exam then you have proved your ability to the exam level, but this does not equate to the ability to do a specific job. There are always a number of nuances to the use of the PIX and any other device that requires complex configuration that can only be gained by experience. Employers need to realise this fact. Isn't Cisco in the process of tightening up the exams?? Cheers Jim Gillen Snr Communications Engineer AUSTRAC Ph: 9950 0842 Fax: 9950 0074 >>> "Simionato, Joao" 4/07/01 3:26:25 >>> This message has been scanned by MAILSweeper. What about the MCNS exam ? Did you take it ? What was the documentation you made usage for preparing to the Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced exam ? Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com -Original Message- From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced exam [7:10842] I took the Cisco PIX Firewall Advanced exam this morning and passed it with a minimumscore of 751. The passing score is 751. The exam contains 60 questions and you have 75minutes to complete it. The exam does NOT let you go back to previous questions. Personally, I think this is one of the most rediculous exams that I have taken in sometime. I'veno hand-on experiences with PIX. I just read the documentation from Cisco website in preparing for the exam. The exam also asks about configuring ACS for windows NT (whocares about that)? It is very poorly written. Almost half of the exam concentrate on applications that are running on windows NT (against who cares) and not PIX related questions. If you ask me, I would tell you that a person like myself with no experience in PIX should NOT pass this exam. I would NOT recommend anyone to jump into Cisco CCNP security track unless Cisco completely revamps the whole security certification process. If Cisco keeps doing this, it will certainly dillute the value of the security certification track. Granted that I have been in the networking field for sometime; however, as I've said earlier, I should NOT pass the exam without the PIX hand-on experiences and just two days of preparation. It is NOT right. If anyone else has already taken this exam and have a different opinion, I would love to hearfrom you. Sean Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10916&t=10842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7). But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't check it, though). Arthur Davis CCIE #6430 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16326&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7). But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't check it, though). Arthur Davis CCIE #6430 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16324&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7). But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't check it, though). Arthur Davis CCIE #6430 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16327&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
im running version 2.4 and so far smooth as hell. nice and easy configuration excelent product.although the newer version out there havent tried them out -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access Control for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to be aware of? I am trying to get approval to purchase this product but managment wants me to get opinions from someone else besides Cisco. Thanks, Harles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16372&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things. The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very well. ""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access Control > for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to be aware of? I am > trying to get approval to purchase this product but managment wants me to > get opinions from someone else besides Cisco. > > Thanks, > > > Harles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16484&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
So far the password changing issue is really the only limitation of ACS that we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same database that your desktops login to (ADS for example) then your password changes will be taken care of. >From: "Chris Clark" >Reply-To: "Chris Clark" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] >Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:53:29 -0400 > >Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things. >The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very well. > > >""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access >Control > > for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to be aware of? >I >am > > trying to get approval to purchase this product but managment wants me >to > > get opinions from someone else besides Cisco. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Harles _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16511&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
The issue comes up when you are using NT or AD as the back-end. Then a user comes in remotely to authenticate with ppp or vpn. If the password has just expired, then they will not be able to login. -Original Message- From: dan snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 8:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] So far the password changing issue is really the only limitation of ACS that we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same database that your desktops login to (ADS for example) then your password changes will be taken care of. >From: "Chris Clark" >Reply-To: "Chris Clark" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] >Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:53:29 -0400 > >Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things. >The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very well. > > >""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access >Control > > for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to be aware of? >I >am > > trying to get approval to purchase this product but managment wants me >to > > get opinions from someone else besides Cisco. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Harles _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16532&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]
Chris This is dredging into the distant past, but I encountered a similar password sync error with a Windows NT domain - the domain had "User must logon to change password" selected. Once this was changed, all was well - it also fixed a few Outlook/Exchange e-mail issues as well. Other than that, was using CiscoSecure/ACS with a 3640 to provide dial-in access and it was pretty sweet... Less problems than the previous NT RAS solution, faster connect speeds, and ACL's and auditing meant we could tidy up a few loose ends. RM Chris Clark wrote: > > The issue comes up when you are using NT or AD as the back-end. > Then a user > comes in remotely to authenticate with ppp or vpn. If the > password has just > expired, then they will not be able to login. > > > -Original Message- > From: dan snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 8:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] > > > So far the password changing issue is really the only > limitation of ACS that > we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same database > that your > desktops login to (ADS for example) then your password changes > will be taken > care of. > > >From: "Chris Clark" > >Reply-To: "Chris Clark" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] > >Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:53:29 -0400 > > > >Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of > different things. > >The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes > very well. > > > > > >""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco > Secure Access > >Control > > > for Windows NT/2000? Are there any gottchas that I need to > be aware of? > >I > >am > > > trying to get approval to purchase this product but > managment wants me > >to > > > get opinions from someone else besides Cisco. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Harles > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16581&t=16318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Advanced (9E1-571) [7:1481]
I would say that there is a fair amount of subject matter overlap, but that the CSPFA questions are significantly harder. The MCNS didn't have any type in questions and those are abundant on CSPFA. The MCNS questions I remember on the Pix and IOS Firewall were really pretty easy and more conceptual than anything. CSPFA tests the details more. Tommy ""Dropped Packet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > For those who have taken this and MCNS, how much overlap was there? What > materials did you use to prepare? Thanks! > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2549&t=1481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure VPN Client for windows 2k [7:3427]
Actually, Cisco has released a Win2K client. We downloaded it last week (sorry, I don't have the URL). We specifically wanted to use it to connect to our PIX. Then we found out that it requires PIX IOS v6 which is not "scheduled" for release until late this week. Jay Dunn IPI GrammTech, Ltd. 210.694.4313 http://www.ipi-gt.com Nunquam Facilis Est -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client for windows 2k [7:3427] I am using IOS based VPN software on my 3640. The Secure VPN Client will not work on a win2k box. I Have heard rumors that there is a beta version that will load on a 2k box. Does any body know of it or is there a work around for building a VPN to the router using IOS feature set. Thanks in advance George FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3430&t=3427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Secure VPN Client for windows 2k [7:3427]
On the Cisco VPN Client download page itself, it states that v3 requires PIXv6: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/vpnclient-3des (linked from http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/ which requires CCO login): "Compatibility Information VPN 3000 Concentrator v3.0 - VPN Client v3.0 PIX Firewall v5.2+ - VPN 3000 Client v2.5 v6.0 - VPN Client v3.0" However, if you can get the Beta Win2k v2.5 client, it does support the PIX until PIXv6 is released (or get PIXv6 beta, but I wouldn't run in a production invironment, plus I've tried to get in on the Beta testing and can't). I haven't heard any dates/version, but IOS is planned to support the VPN Client as well. BTW: I hear PIXv6 is due out anytime now. Depending on how many boxes you need to support (if it was just a few netadmin boxes), you could purchase per-client licenses from IRE.com (OEM for the original "Cisco Secure VPN Client" v1.0 & v1.1). They've had a Win2K version out for some time (although I've not used it). If you need to support a large number, you're going to have to wait for the support to be added to IOS for the new "Unified Client" (previously known as Concentrator 3000 client), aka "Cisco VPN Client" (not "Cisco Secure VPN Client" which is just a Cisco-branded OEM from IRE). -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ ""Jay Dunn"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Actually, Cisco has released a Win2K client. We downloaded it last week > (sorry, I don't have the URL). We specifically wanted to use it to connect > to our PIX. Then we found out that it requires PIX IOS v6 which is not > "scheduled" for release until late this week. > > Jay Dunn > IPI GrammTech, Ltd. > 210.694.4313 > http://www.ipi-gt.com > Nunquam Facilis Est > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco Secure VPN Client for windows 2k [7:3427] > > > I am using IOS based VPN software on my 3640. The Secure VPN Client will > not work on a win2k box. I Have heard rumors that there is a beta version > that will load on a 2k box. Does any body know of it or is there a work > around for building a VPN to the router using IOS feature set. > > Thanks in advance > > George Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3434&t=3427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS, AP350, and Orinoco AP1000 [7:33571]
Terry, I found some info on the following website: http://www.tuanistechnology.com/Orinoco/orinoco_ap1000.htm "Industry-Wide Interoperability and Compliance The ORiNOCO AP-1000 is interoperable with other manufacturers' high-speed IEEE 802.11b compliant systems. It's also compatible with Lucent's previous 2 Mbit/s and Turbo products." That sounds like it should at least be compatible with the Cisco A350s. If you follow the link http://www.tuanistechnology.com/pdf_files.htm, you can also download an install guide in .PDF-format. Hope this might help. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33582&t=33571 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure service stops for no reason.. [7:75189]
ACS will show messages like that when it backs up the database. It pauses, or interupts services to perform the backup. Normally the services should pick right back up very quickly, but if it doesn't for some reason, you will have to manually restart services. The same thing happened once with the ACS system I administer. So you might want to check into if there is a correlation between when this happens and when backups occur. -Aaron Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75206&t=75189 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: cisco secure ids - worth the cost? (formerly net ranger) [7:8038]
Hi! pro: - in a full cisco environment it's the best choice, shunning works very well! con: - price - signature updates only bimonthly - managing with CSPM is simple, but it's nothing compared to solutions like ISS Realsecure Workgroup Manager -- cU, Laszlo Csosza ""Jerry Deer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone have any experience with the cisco secure ids intrusion > detection? (formerly known as net ranger) We are considering this solution > for router security and was hoping someone could fill us in on the pro's and > con's . > Thanks for any replies! > Jerry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8038&t=8038 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
