Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-03-21 Thread Warner Dan

So to answer your original question, yes!  So what do you have to study. 
Well you might want to know how to set up simple label switching.  This
includes P and PE.  You might also want to setup VPNs using OSPF and IS-IS
as the transit IGP.  You might also want to set it up using MP-BGP.

Also play with label stacking.

You will want to setup both frame mode and cell mode and inter-mix the two.

You might try MPLS-TE over OSPF and IS-IS single and multi-area.  You might
want to also play around with LSP leaking into the IGP.  This will change
you IGP database and create short cuts.

I do not think you will see any Layer 2 MPLS technologies, since the web
page says 12.1 or lower code.  So no EoMPLS or AToM or QinQ.

Since the CS covers QOS/Multicast/MPLS/Advanced BGP and IS-IS and other
topics, I would think it represents a fairly current offering from most
Service Providers today.

The RS should have MPLS, although the most Enterprises are not deploying
MPLS like SPs are.  Are they a slowly adopting it!

As far as the Juniper exam.  If you look at which is recognized by the
people that hire us poor engineers, most now know what a CCIE is, hm,
not sure about JNCIE or whatever it is!  Also, how many non-SP companies
have Juniper in their networks-very few!

Regards,

Dan


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39122t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-03-01 Thread travis marlow

um...I work with Optical/voice/cable/dsl..  I didn't know about this cert
but it sounds pretty good.  I'm concentrating on the R/S right now because I
believe that it is a good foundation to expand from.  I work for a
Cable/Telephone/Broadband Internet company that offers all 3 services over a
single coax to your residence.  We also have a large fiber ring around
Kansas City that we light via ONS 15454's.  Offer traditional TDM services
and some metro ethernet.  We also own a sister company that my group is
responsible for that delivers the converged services via VDSL.  I moved into
this environment from an enterprise environment and I'm having a blast. 
Everything is new and exciting with technology galore to learn.  The point
of this post was to say that there are some of us out there that would be a
good fit for the CCIE C/S.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36963t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-03-01 Thread nrf

Uh, Are you sure?  Take a look at the C/S lab requirements.  Not the written
requirements, but the lab requirements.  Notice how the lab has practically
nothing to do with the written(s).

Part of the great confusion over the C/S program is the fact that it has 8
possible writtens (each one concentrating on one particular provider
technology - like you mentioned: optical, dial, DSL, etc.).  But then the
lab has nothing to do with any of those technologies, and concentrates on
those niche provider applications that I mentioned before.   No matter
whether you passed the written for optical, or the written for dial, or
whatever, you still end up taking the same C/S lab as everybody else, which
by the way has nothing to do with optical, or dial, or whatever you did.
This stands as a far cry from, say, R/S or the Security CCIE program, where
the written actually is tied fairly closely to the lab.   Again, this
further adds to the confusion and muddling of the program.

By becoming a fully-fledged C/S CCIE, you have not demonstrated hands-on
competence in the ONS series, or the Stratacom stuff, or the Cisco DSL
stuff, or whatever.   You have demonstrated only book knowledge.  Like I
said, if you don't believe this, take a look at the lab requirements
carefully.




travis marlow  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 um...I work with Optical/voice/cable/dsl..  I didn't know about this cert
 but it sounds pretty good.  I'm concentrating on the R/S right now because
I
 believe that it is a good foundation to expand from.  I work for a
 Cable/Telephone/Broadband Internet company that offers all 3 services over
a
 single coax to your residence.  We also have a large fiber ring around
 Kansas City that we light via ONS 15454's.  Offer traditional TDM services
 and some metro ethernet.  We also own a sister company that my group is
 responsible for that delivers the converged services via VDSL.  I moved
into
 this environment from an enterprise environment and I'm having a blast.
 Everything is new and exciting with technology galore to learn.  The point
 of this post was to say that there are some of us out there that would be
a
 good fit for the CCIE C/S.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36983t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Mike Mandulak

Tis a shame too. I ran a Vines network for about 8 years and have yet to
find a better protocol.


- Original Message -
From: ko haag 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


 Same here, alot of my customers are still running most of these protocols
 and the only I
 have not seen in a while is Vines (to bad too, it was Better than
 Microsuck...sorry i
 meant soft.) :-P.

 David C Prall wrote:

  Steven,
  I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
 Vines,
  DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't
seen
  recently in the real world.
 
  David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
  - Original Message -
  From: Steven A. Ridder
  To:
  Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
  Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
 
   For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track
getting
   outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful,
not
  as
   current.
  
   --
  
   RFC 1149 Compliant.
  
  
   Persio Pucci  wrote in message
   news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
   
tks!
   
Persio Pucci - CCNP
UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36791t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Steven A Ridder

I looked on Cisco and I can't figure out which CCIE the C/S CCIE falls
under.  Which one is that?

--
RFC 1149 Compliant

nrf  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 You say you want to study more recent technologies?  Simple answer - the
 Juniper JNCIE.   Or possibly the C/S CCIE, but the fact that that exam has
 only been successful passed by one person (the proctor in Halifax),
perhaps
 it's not such a good idea.

 Steven A. Ridder  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  I saw a network recently with DECNet, but you've got to admit, they're
few
  and far between.  I've done a 100:1 ratio of wireless networks, vpn,
  firewalls, etc,. as compared to a DECnet or Banyan Vines network (in
fact,
  I've never seen a banyan vines network except in my old college
library).
  Even IPX is going away (excpet for the diehard Microsoft haters).
 
  I don't know about you, but I'd like some more recent topics to be
covered
  on the exam because I feel like I'm studying irrelvant stuff sometimes.
I
  feel like I'm wasting my brain on some stuff.
  --
 
  RFC 1149 Compliant.
 
 
  David C Prall  wrote in message
  news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
   Steven,
   I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
  Vines,
   DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't
 seen
   recently in the real world.
  
   David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
   - Original Message -
   From: Steven A. Ridder
   To:
   Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
   Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
  
  
For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track
 getting
outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful,
 not
   as
current.
   
--
   
RFC 1149 Compliant.
   
   
Persio Pucci  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?

 tks!

 Persio Pucci - CCNP
 UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36796t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Nilesh Pujari

Here u go.

CCIE Communications  Services

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36809t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Steven A Ridder

That C/S cert seems to be the way to go!   That's what I'd go for, but since
only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
never get a CCIE number that way.  I may go for that cert once I get my R/S
CCIE done.  What makes that test so hard?  And has anyone heard anything
about a CCIE in voice technologies coming out?

--
RFC 1149 Compliant


Nilesh Pujari  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Here u go.

 CCIE Communications  Services

 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36813t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Chuck

I suppose the philosophical question is whether the CCIE a forward looking
or backward looking cert? I am under the impression that Cisco originally
geared the test around what a significant number of Cisco large customers
were running.

I'm sure there are still Vines networks around. I'm not sure if PGE, for
example, ever got around to migrating away from Vines. Let alone Nature's
Conservancy. Hell, there might even be a few XNS networks out there
somewhere.

Especially now that the Lab format is one day, Cisco can't test for
everything. They have to focus.  So it becomes a matter of what's important.
Sooner or later ( and this will be bad news for most of us ) Cisco is also
going to have to migrate the Lab pods to more current equipment. Either that
or tacitly admit that a lot of the high end solutions they hawk are really
not all that important.

Another tack they might take is to create CCIE tracks for every specialty
that comes along - voice, WAN, QoS, wireless, VPN, etc.

But I'm not sure I agree that just because there are people out there
running obsolete technologies, that the CCIE Lab should test those
technologies. IBM now runs Linux on some of their mainframe products. Token
ring and DLSw are dying. The future is IP. Sure the legacy stuff will hang
on for a while yet. But seeing as CCIE skills are as much a marketing
strategy for Cisco as a resource for customers, I would think that older
technologies will have to yield their place in the lab for the new stuff
that Cisco counts on for future revenue.

Just my couple of cents.

Chuck

David C Prall  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Steven,
 I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
Vines,
 DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't seen
 recently in the real world.

 David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Steven A. Ridder
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
 Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


  For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track getting
  outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not
 as
  current.
 
  --
 
  RFC 1149 Compliant.
 
 
  Persio Pucci  wrote in message
  news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
   How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
  
   tks!
  
   Persio Pucci - CCNP
   UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36819t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread nrf

Well no,  I would actually argue that right now the Juniper JNCIE is the
better way to go, for a number of reasons.  Yeah yeah, I know I'm going to
get flamed for that (and already had been, on previous occasions when I said
this).  But the fact is, not only is the JNCIE program is testing on the
more recent technologies that you said you wanted to look into, but again,
the fact that the C/S program is highly muddled and confused (they keep
changing the focus of that exam, I can't tell you much more due to NDA), and
the fact that the test grading procedure has been, suffice it to say, rather
controversial - I'll just leave it at that.  The point is that because of
these factors, the C/S has so far gained essentially no traction and
recognition within the service-provider market it supposedly caters to.
I've noticed that providers will either have no idea what the C/S progam is
and just assume you're talking about the R/S, or they do know, and therefore
know how confused the program is.


Steven A Ridder  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 That C/S cert seems to be the way to go!   That's what I'd go for, but
since
 only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
 never get a CCIE number that way.  I may go for that cert once I get my
R/S
 CCIE done.  What makes that test so hard?  And has anyone heard anything
 about a CCIE in voice technologies coming out?

 --
 RFC 1149 Compliant


 Nilesh Pujari  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Here u go.
 
  CCIE Communications  Services
 
  http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36836t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Michael Cohen

Where did you get you're information regarding only one person passing the
C/S CCIE?  I registered for the lab back in December and was told there were
already 6 people who had passed...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A Ridder
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


That C/S cert seems to be the way to go!   That's what I'd go for, but since
only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
never get a CCIE number that way.  I may go for that cert once I get my R/S
CCIE done.  What makes that test so hard?  And has anyone heard anything
about a CCIE in voice technologies coming out?

--
RFC 1149 Compliant


Nilesh Pujari  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Here u go.

 CCIE Communications  Services

 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36854t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread Cisco Nuts

Even 6 is a very, very low number compared to R/S? I have always wondered 
what kind of individuals got this cert? I mean, obviously it is not possible 
to do it on your own(financially...probably need to have an 
optical/dsl/cbl/voice etc. equipment at home). Also, what would it's worth 
be in the real world? I mean how many people out there actually work in a 
optical/voice/dsl/cable environment in the same company?
Just my $0.2


From: Michael Cohen 
Reply-To: Michael Cohen 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:11:48 -0500

Where did you get you're information regarding only one person passing the
C/S CCIE?  I registered for the lab back in December and was told there 
were
already 6 people who had passed...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A Ridder
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


That C/S cert seems to be the way to go!   That's what I'd go for, but 
since
only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that I'd
never get a CCIE number that way.  I may go for that cert once I get my R/S
CCIE done.  What makes that test so hard?  And has anyone heard anything
about a CCIE in voice technologies coming out?

--
RFC 1149 Compliant


Nilesh Pujari  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Here u go.
 
  CCIE Communications  Services
 
  http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html
_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36905t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-28 Thread nrf

You are correct to say that at this time, the demand for C/S guys is very
low (essentially non-existent), for 3 main reasons, I believe.  #1, the
service-provider job market right now is total crap.  #2 - to compound that
problem the technologies that exam is based on are truly bleeding edge even
for the service-provider such that there isn't exactly a groundswell demand
for those particular skills.  So we're talking about a particularly bad
segment of a particularly bad job market.  And of course #3 - Cisco hasn't
exactly done the best job in marketing the C/S.  Seriously I can find very
few people who know what it is, even people working in the service-provider
space.

Cisco Nuts  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Even 6 is a very, very low number compared to R/S? I have always wondered
 what kind of individuals got this cert? I mean, obviously it is not
possible
 to do it on your own(financially...probably need to have an
 optical/dsl/cbl/voice etc. equipment at home). Also, what would it's worth
 be in the real world? I mean how many people out there actually work in a
 optical/voice/dsl/cable environment in the same company?
 Just my $0.2


 From: Michael Cohen
 Reply-To: Michael Cohen
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:11:48 -0500
 
 Where did you get you're information regarding only one person passing
the
 C/S CCIE?  I registered for the lab back in December and was told there
 were
 already 6 people who had passed...
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Steven A Ridder
 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:55 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
 
 
 That C/S cert seems to be the way to go!   That's what I'd go for, but
 since
 only one person has ever passed it, I think it may be safe to say that
I'd
 never get a CCIE number that way.  I may go for that cert once I get my
R/S
 CCIE done.  What makes that test so hard?  And has anyone heard anything
 about a CCIE in voice technologies coming out?
 
 --
 RFC 1149 Compliant
 
 
 Nilesh Pujari  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
   Here u go.
  
   CCIE Communications  Services
  
   http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/services.html
 _
 Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36907t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-27 Thread Steven A. Ridder

For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track getting
outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not as
current.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.


Persio Pucci  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?

 tks!

 Persio Pucci - CCNP
 UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36699t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-27 Thread David C Prall

Steven,
I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running Vines,
DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't seen
recently in the real world.

David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


 For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track getting
 outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not
as
 current.

 --

 RFC 1149 Compliant.


 Persio Pucci  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
 
  tks!
 
  Persio Pucci - CCNP
  UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36714t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-27 Thread Persio Pucci

I agree with you. However, they are required only in the written exam. A lot
of them (i.e. DECnet, VINES and even X.25 and Appletalk) were removed from
the lab and are still only inthe written.

Cisco seems to be recycling their certifications, or at least CCNP for now
(as seen at
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/beta_exams.h
tm). Maybe we can expect a new recycle at the CCIE program?

Persio

- Original Message -
From: Steven A. Ridder 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


 For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track getting
 outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not
as
 current.

 --

 RFC 1149 Compliant.


 Persio Pucci  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
 
  tks!
 
  Persio Pucci - CCNP
  UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36718t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-27 Thread Steven A. Ridder

I saw a network recently with DECNet, but you've got to admit, they're few
and far between.  I've done a 100:1 ratio of wireless networks, vpn,
firewalls, etc,. as compared to a DECnet or Banyan Vines network (in fact,
I've never seen a banyan vines network except in my old college library).
Even IPX is going away (excpet for the diehard Microsoft haters).

I don't know about you, but I'd like some more recent topics to be covered
on the exam because I feel like I'm studying irrelvant stuff sometimes.  I
feel like I'm wasting my brain on some stuff.
--

RFC 1149 Compliant.


David C Prall  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Steven,
 I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
Vines,
 DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't seen
 recently in the real world.

 David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Steven A. Ridder
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
 Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]


  For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track getting
  outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not
 as
  current.
 
  --
 
  RFC 1149 Compliant.
 
 
  Persio Pucci  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
  
   tks!
  
   Persio Pucci - CCNP
   UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36723t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-27 Thread ko haag

Same here, alot of my customers are still running most of these protocols
and the only I
have not seen in a while is Vines (to bad too, it was Better than
Microsuck...sorry i
meant soft.) :-P.

David C Prall wrote:

 Steven,
 I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
Vines,
 DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't seen
 recently in the real world.

 David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Steven A. Ridder
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
 Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

  For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track getting
  outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful, not
 as
  current.
 
  --
 
  RFC 1149 Compliant.
 
 
  Persio Pucci  wrote in message
  news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
   How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
  
   tks!
  
   Persio Pucci - CCNP
   UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36773t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]

2002-02-27 Thread nrf

You say you want to study more recent technologies?  Simple answer - the
Juniper JNCIE.   Or possibly the C/S CCIE, but the fact that that exam has
only been successful passed by one person (the proctor in Halifax), perhaps
it's not such a good idea.

Steven A. Ridder  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 I saw a network recently with DECNet, but you've got to admit, they're few
 and far between.  I've done a 100:1 ratio of wireless networks, vpn,
 firewalls, etc,. as compared to a DECnet or Banyan Vines network (in fact,
 I've never seen a banyan vines network except in my old college library).
 Even IPX is going away (excpet for the diehard Microsoft haters).

 I don't know about you, but I'd like some more recent topics to be covered
 on the exam because I feel like I'm studying irrelvant stuff sometimes.  I
 feel like I'm wasting my brain on some stuff.
 --

 RFC 1149 Compliant.


 David C Prall  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Steven,
  I don't know if it is outdated or not. I still have customers running
 Vines,
  DecNet, IPX and AppleTalk. Of course chaos, apollo and pup I haven't
seen
  recently in the real world.
 
  David C Prall   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://dcp.dcptech.com
  - Original Message -
  From: Steven A. Ridder
  To:
  Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:51 PM
  Subject: Re: MPLS in CCIE [7:36682]
 
 
   For routing and switching - none.  Is it me or is the RS track
getting
   outdated?  It seems to cover technologies that, although are useful,
not
  as
   current.
  
   --
  
   RFC 1149 Compliant.
  
  
   Persio Pucci  wrote in message
   news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
How much of MPLS (if some at all) is covered in the CCIE exams?
   
tks!
   
Persio Pucci - CCNP
UOL Inc. - Tecnologia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36779t=36682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]