RE: [expert] Patch File problem
Nevermind my previous post about help for the patch problem. I finally figured it out and got it to compile this time around. I will let you folks knows the current status on this patch of the IDS to the 2.2.17 kernel package later on today, after I complete the compliation and testing to ensure it works without any problems. Once done..then I will post the patch to Chmouel for him to merge into the kernel tree for the 2.2.17 update with LIDS Addition. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher
[Cooker] BUILD of Source Mandrake 7.2 2.2.17-21mdk.src.rpm
Okay. New problem. Heh sort of getting annoying now. Have anyone complied the source package of the kernel and to get this message at the near end when it supposed to start compling? make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/arch/i386/mm' make -C arch/i386/lib fastdep make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/arch/i386/lib' /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/scripts/mkdep checksum.S delay.c getuser.S old-checksum.c putuser.S semaphore.S usercopy.c .depend make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/arch/i386/lib' make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux' + make include/linux/version.h make: `include/linux/version.h' is up to date. + '[' -z '' ']' ++ egrep -c '^cpu[0-9]+' /proc/stat ++ : + NPROCS=0 + '[' -z 0 -o 0 -le 0 ']' + NPROCS=1 + make -j1 bzImage gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36, from scripts/split-include.c:26: /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory make: *** [scripts/split-include] Error 1 Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22905 (%build) This is what I like to figure out how to make it work properly, since it should work. :) It is getting real annoying here now. Any help is appreciated. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Awalt Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Problems with 2.4.1-8mdk I did a --nodeps and it installed fine - not sure why it thought there was a dependency..thanks - Original Message - From: "Howard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Daouda LO" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 8:35 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Problems with 2.4.1-8mdk On Saturday 10 February 2001 2:09 am, Daouda LO wrote: "Don Awalt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] then did rpm -ivh on the kernel-utils. When I rpm -ivh the kernel-smp, I get dependency error on kdeaddutils. i don't think you need this package to install kernel : So do a --nodeps there . I've just done something similar,but the error is file conflicts,something like kernal-2.4.1 file conflicts with kdeaddutils=2.0.3mdk Howard
RE: [Cooker] BUILD of Source Mandrake 7.2 2.2.17-21mdk.src.rpm
Nevermind that. Figured it out. That how you get when you haven't got more than 4 hours of sleep and trying to get the kernel to work as it should be. :) -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Russell "Elik" Rademacher Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Expert@Linux-Mandrake. Com Subject: [Cooker] BUILD of Source Mandrake 7.2 2.2.17-21mdk.src.rpm Okay. New problem. Heh sort of getting annoying now. Have anyone complied the source package of the kernel and to get this message at the near end when it supposed to start compling? make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/arch/i386/mm' make -C arch/i386/lib fastdep make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/arch/i386/lib' /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/scripts/mkdep checksum.S delay.c getuser.S old-checksum.c putuser.S semaphore.S usercopy.c .depend make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux/arch/i386/lib' make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/linux' + make include/linux/version.h make: `include/linux/version.h' is up to date. + '[' -z '' ']' ++ egrep -c '^cpu[0-9]+' /proc/stat ++ : + NPROCS=0 + '[' -z 0 -o 0 -le 0 ']' + NPROCS=1 + make -j1 bzImage gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36, from scripts/split-include.c:26: /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory make: *** [scripts/split-include] Error 1 Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22905 (%build) This is what I like to figure out how to make it work properly, since it should work. :) It is getting real annoying here now. Any help is appreciated. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Awalt Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Problems with 2.4.1-8mdk I did a --nodeps and it installed fine - not sure why it thought there was a dependency..thanks - Original Message - From: "Howard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Daouda LO" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 8:35 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Problems with 2.4.1-8mdk On Saturday 10 February 2001 2:09 am, Daouda LO wrote: "Don Awalt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] then did rpm -ivh on the kernel-utils. When I rpm -ivh the kernel-smp, I get dependency error on kdeaddutils. i don't think you need this package to install kernel : So do a --nodeps there . I've just done something similar,but the error is file conflicts,something like kernal-2.4.1 file conflicts with kdeaddutils=2.0.3mdk Howard
[Cooker] Good News... LIDS Enhanced Mandrake Kernels Available
Good news folks. I have finally patched and successfully complied and installed the LIDS Enhanced Mandrake Kernel without removal of any patches that currently exists. I will be sending to kernel maintainer the patches for the LIDS and the accompanying program with it so that he can incorporate it into the 2.2.17 release and I will look into the 2.2.18 version as well, provided he got available for 7.2 release. Anyone intersted in 2.4.1 LIDS Version, let me know and I will look into it and perhaps produce a new patch for it to be sent to the maintainer for use. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher
[Cooker] LIDS Patch into the Kernel?
Have anyone considered patching the Secure Kernel with the LIDS from http://www.lids.org for Linux? I am thinking of patching the secure kernel files with that and then compile it to see if I can implement a new system to contribute back to the Mandrake for it. Dunno if we have released the 2.2.18 version yet, but I am looking into patching the 2.2.17 version at this moment and try it from there to see how it works and see if it is worth while addition and to make Mandrake stands out from other distros by having it part of the standard features. Don't get me wrong...it got wonderful stuff, but we need a good IDS system in there and frankly... I cannot seems to find one that is good for host by host basis, not network version. Snort comes to mind, but I cannot afford to setup a spare box to do the monitoring of all servers from remote box, when I can do something about it on host basis. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher
[expert] Patch File problem
Okay...perhaps someone can assist me on this little problem.
I have this tulip.c file which I need to patch with a new patch file..but
it seems it just fails everytime, no matter how it matches. So... anyone
can assist on this? Here is the patch and the target area. It also have a
problem with the 2 parts of the ide.c patch as well. But everything else is
patched cleanly without any problems after fixing the patch to fit after the
whole set of patches that is setup with the kernel.
Patch:
diff -N -r -u linux-2.2.17/drivers/net/tulip.c linux/drivers/net/tulip.c
--- linux-2.2.17/drivers/net/tulip.cWed Sep 6 19:46:56 2000
+++ linux/drivers/net/tulip.c Tue Nov 14 17:33:39 2000
@@ -3038,4 +3038,9 @@
}
return 0;
-case SIOCSMIIREG: /* Write the specified MII register */
- if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+case SIOCSMIIREG: /* Write the specified MII register */
+ if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_LIDS
+ lids_security_alert("CAP_NET_ADMIN violation: try to set %s MII
register",dev-name);
+#endif
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
~
Original:
data[3] |= ((csr149)0x07C0); - Line 3030
break;
}
case 5: data[3] = csr12 16; break;
default: data[3] = 0; break;
}
} else {
data[3] = mdio_read(dev, data[0] 0x1f, regnum);
}
return 0;
case SIOCSMIIREG: /* Write the specified MII register */
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if (regnum ~0x1f)
return -EINVAL;
if (data[0] == phy) {
switch (regnum) {
case 0: tp-full_duplex = ((data[2] 0x1100) == 0x0100); break;
case 4: tp-mii_advertise = data[2]; break; - Line 3048
So...from what I can see.. it should patch cleanly, but it doesn't. I keep
getting this error as follows:
[root@qwikhost linux]# patch -p1 test
patching file drivers/net/tulip.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3038.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/tulip.c.rej
I also included the entire patch file which is to be intregrated into the
2.2.17-src.mdk.rpm file which to produce the LIDS-Enchanced Kernels of
Mandrake, which I like to use. If anyone can get those three areas fixed,
which it keep failing, then I appreciate it.
Chmouel Boudjnah, I have included the modified patch for the 2.2.17 tree
which you have made extensive changes and patches to it. It all patches
cleanly except for three areas. If you can check them out and see what to
be done to make it work, then let me know so I can continue on it and then
continue the LIDS intregration and perhaps submit back to you the final
version along with the LIDS setup.
--
Linux Administrator Consultant
Russell "Elik" Rademacher
lids-0.9.11-2.2.17.patch.bz2
RE: [Cooker] BIND 8.2.2p7 Problems
Actually... it is 8.2.3 sorry. My bad on the version number. :) -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] BIND 8.2.2p7 Problems Update your Bind to 8.2.3. Prana -- Prana [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cyest.org My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21) Key fingerprint = F1FB 1F76 8866 0F40 A801 D9DA 6BED 6641 3334 3FD3 http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x33343FD3 Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
[Cooker] BIND 8.2.2p7 Problems
Okay guys. Have anyone else have problems with the BIND 8.2.2p7 package from the updates? It seems it is screwed up totally since it have a major problem with the zone files. I tried it on all 5 different DNS servers and they all have experienced problems, which forced me back to 8.2.2p5 version til then. Here is the logs of what I got when I installed the updated version. 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.171 default: warning: owner name ").signaturelaundry.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.182 default: warning: owner name ").signaturelaundry.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.185 default: warning: owner name ").sportyrentals.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.185 default: warning: owner name ").sportyrentals.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.188 default: warning: owner name ").managementmasters.net" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.188 default: warning: owner name ").managementmasters.net" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.189 default: warning: owner name ").thoughtenergy.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.189 default: warning: owner name ").thoughtenergy.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.191 default: warning: owner name ").unixinternet.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.191 default: warning: owner name ").unixinternet.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.192 default: warning: owner name ").linuxisland.net" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.192 default: warning: owner name ").linuxisland.net" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.193 default: warning: owner name ").philippinenurses.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.193 default: warning: owner name ").philippinenurses.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.194 default: warning: owner name ").hercaddie.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.194 default: warning: owner name ").hercaddie.com" IN (primary) is invalid - rejecting 07-Feb-2001 06:36:57.229 default: notice: Ready to answer queries. See... the problem existed with the ).domain part. That is really screwy...since all zone files are made properly, but this is shown on all DNS records that is created. So...I wonder if anyone else have this problem. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher
[expert] FP broken with Apache 1.3.14-2mdk
It seems that the FP module or the Apache itself is broken with the Frontpage Module enabled. Dunno why but I get this error message in the error_log as follows: [Sun Jan 28 22:43:28 2001] [notice] Apache-AdvancedExtranetServer/1.3.14 (Linux-Mandrake/2mdk) mod_ssl/2.7.1 OpenSSL/0.9.5a FrontPage/4.0.4.3 configured -- resuming normal oper [Sun Jan 28 22:43:28 2001] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Mon Jan 29 03:43:53 2001] FrontPage SUID Error: invalid target gid So... after checking though the documentations and mailing lists.. it seems that 1.3.14 version have completely broken it, but not the 1.3.12 version or before that. I also noticed that the perl tests have errors spitted out when I tried the source version... which tells me that the 1.3.14 build is really broken. Have anyone found this same problem as well? -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher
RE: [Cooker] REALLY need a nongui MandrakeUpdate
I agree with this. That is what is mainly lacking. It would be nice if there is the apt-get tool version for RPM to use for the servers. MandrakeUpdate is nice, but we really need the console based version, instead of the GUI, with list of file watcher so that it knows where to update when it become available. Hope that someone considers this. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher -Original Message- From: Brian J. Murrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] REALLY need a nongui MandrakeUpdate There is one place where Mandrake is REALLY suffering at trying to gain acceptability into the enterprise. A non-gui update tool. Right now, if I have a shop with 50 Linux servers, I am not going to log into each server and run MandrakeUpdate. You know what I AM going to do? I am going to have cron run up2date (RedHat's updater) in batch mode (on RedHat boxes in case that was not obvious). There are huge security reasons to load all of the shit that is needed for MandrakeUpdate too. I don't want X-windows and perl on my secrurity gateways. Way too many holes and tools for the Wiley Cracker thanks. How about a non-perl (and non-python for that matter -- be better than RH) based character based, batchable update tool already? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
[expert] Crontab Broken in 7.2?
Is the Crontab broken in the Mandrake 7.2? For past few days after I installed the new crontabs for one user and another as other, it simply do not run at all. Here is the entry that I set up in the crontab as follows: Elik's Crontab: 25 13 17 * * tar -zcpf /home/elik/archives-backup/2798-Monthly-`date '+%b'`.tar.gz /home/bt2798/2798/backups/`date '+b'`* 20 13 17 * * tar -zcpf /home/elik/archives-backup/3056-Monthly-`date '+%b'`.tar.gz /home/bt3056/3056/backups/`date '+b'`* Bt2798's Crontab 22 13 * * * /bin/sh tar -zcpf /home/bt2798/backup/bt2798-`date '+%b-%d-%a'`.tar.gz /home/bt2798/2798/data/ So..after few days of checking the directories... they do not have it. I tested the command as it is and it works nicely, but no under cron. It seems regular cron jobs that is placed in the /etc works fine, but nothing for the crontab files. Any clue guys? -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher
[Cooker] Stealth Kernel Patch Feature Request
I been reading and noticed that there is the Stealth Kernel Patch feature which would be a nice addition to the Mandrake Secure Kernel version. The information can be found at this url link as follows: http://www.energymech.net/madcamel/fm/ I think this item would be a good addition to the distro for the security feature, since I checked the source and noticed that we do not have that in there, but we did have other patches in there though. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stefan van der Eijk Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] aboot-0.7a-2mdk Hi Jeff, While you're at it, could you also fix netscape-alpha? http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/netscape-alpha-4.76 -2mdk.src.rpm http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/netscape-alpha.spec PS: aboot has been fixed fince July, nobidy wanted to put it in though... http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/aboot-0.7a-2mdk.src.rpm http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/aboot.spec http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/aboot.spec.diff http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/aboot.spec.orig
RE: [Cooker] YOU DID IT TO ME AGAIN!! FIX THE SENDMAIL PACKAGERIGHT NOW!!I c
Jeez Brian. Why you have to be so upbeat on the Sendmail? If you checked, Mandrake preferred Postfix over the Sendmail for lot of reasons and used it as default. If you have problems with Sendmail, why not just compile a new one for yourself and install it. It is not that hard to do it anyway, since I used Sendmail, Qmail and Postfix and I liked the Qmail and Postfix over Sendmail anyday. So just try and do that method and do it that way? Or get the Source RPM version of Sendmail and check the specs and fix it before having it built and compiled. That what most true administrators and linux gurus would do if the released packaged RPM version is not 100% perfect. -- Linux Administrator Consultant Russell "Elik" Rademacher WELL I GOT NEWS FOR YA!! I lost about another dozen mail messages again today becuase IT IS NOT FIXED!! It's just their gentle way of trying to convince you to switch to Posrfix... Harry 1stUp.com - Free the Web Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com
[Cooker] Cold Fusion Installation on Mandrake 7.1 and 7.2
Hello all. I am wondering if anyone have successfully installed the Coldfusion on Linux which is apparently designed for Redhat 6.2 only? For it look for specific libraries to have it run properly, and frankly, I thought I solved those problems by getting the specific libraries which is the egcs++ and libstdc++ libarries from Redhat 6.2 files and it seems to stopped the bitching of mis-match libraries linking, but it still refuses to run, insteading giving me the lovely core dumps so far. Frankly, I would love to run the Coldfusion on Mandrake, but there is just no way that I am touching Redhat with the long stick even just to run the ColdFusion. Any help on this? I tried to get it working on 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2 and no success yet. Hopefully someone else can help, since it is needed. Perhaps, we can convince Allaire to release the binary releases for Mandrake and other distros due to incompabilities between distros? -- Linux Support Administrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd. _NetZero Free Internet Access and Email__ http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
[Cooker] Quota File Missing
Heads up. There is one file missing from the quota package which is the quota binary. It is in the quota package quota-1.70-3mdk.i586.rpm, which it got all required files except for quota itself. Mind get that missing file in it and update the 7.2 Beta with that update? Reason is that I did major upgrade from 7.1 to 7.2 Beta on my production Web Server and got everything working except for that missing little snippet. So..get that sucker in and let me know. :) -- Linux Support Administrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd. ___ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
[expert] /USR Files underneath Wiped after Power Outage
Now I got a problem here, and I am wondering if anyone have experienced something anything remote to this. I have built the 7.1/7.2 Beta Server and it been running for about 2 days, when we had a power outage. So... when the power came back on, and I rebooted the machine, I noticed that one partition, the /usr seems to be wiped entirely. Reason is that when it started the init script bootup, it will spawn like crazy and stops there and I have to boot into it as single user mode to see what the problem is wrong. Anyone got this similiar problem here, since I got that kind of problem with 7.1 back then on my workstation few times and I thought it is a freak of nature. But now...having seen the same thing on production server, it make me wonders if there is seriously wrong with the distro or something that I have in place. -- Linux Support Administrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd. ___ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
RE: [Cooker] Compliments on 7.2rc
Noticed something. Is there any chance of the new Apache put out to replace the 1.3.12, which is now 1.3.14 which is released yesterday? I do not think it would take much time to have it ready for release into the RC Version. -- Linux Support Administrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben Reser Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 4:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] Compliments on 7.2rc I just wanted to give my compliments on the beta. It's becomming much more stable. Get linuxconf fixed and I don't really see any reason it shouldn't be gold (except maybe to wait for KDE2 final). Also I thought I'd point out that my fresh install via the network has increased in speed 3 fold. Used to talk an hour and a half to run from a local mirror I keep. Only takes 30 minutes now. Bravo! Keep up the good work! -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org "EXTREMELY SERIOUS WARNING: Unless you are as smart as Johann Karl Friedrich Gauss, savvy as a half-blind Calcutta bootblack, tough as General William Tecumseh Sherman, rich as the Queen of England, emotionally resilient as a Red Sox fan, and as generally able to take care of yourself as the average nuclear missile submarine commander, you should have never been allowed near this document. Please dispose of it as you would any piece of high-level radioactive waste and then arrange with a qualified surgeon to amputate your arms at the elbows and gouge your eyes from their sockets" - Neal Stephenson, Crytonomicon NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_ Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633 ___
RE: [Cooker] ld.so.conf
There is additional item to add to the list of concerns. There seems to be a missing older version of the libdl.so.1 files which seems to have disappeared from the ld.so-1.9.11-4mdk.i586.rpm. Here is what the items seems to be missing compared to the older version which is composed of two packages of ld.so-1.9.5-13mdk.rpm and ld-config.1.9.5-13mdk.rpm. Here is what provided in the ld.so-1.9.5-13mdk.rpm which is as follows: [root@unixhost4 dedop]# rpm -q -p ld.so-1.9.5-13mdk.i586.rpm -l /lib/ld-linux.so.1 /lib/ld-linux.so.1.9.5 /lib/ld.so /lib/ld.so.1.9.5 /lib/libdl.so.1.9.5 /usr/man/man1/ldd.1.bz2 /usr/man/man3/dlclose.3.bz2 /usr/man/man3/dlerror.3.bz2 /usr/man/man3/dlopen.3.bz2 /usr/man/man3/dlsym.3.bz2 /usr/man/man8/ld.so.8.bz2 /usr/man/man8/ldconfig.8.bz2 And the newer in the cooker which is the ld.so.1.9.11-4.mdk.i586.rpm which is as follows: /lib/ld-linux.so.1 /lib/ld-linux.so.1.9.11 /sbin/ldconfig /usr/share/doc/ld.so-1.9.11 /usr/share/doc/ld.so-1.9.11/README /usr/share/doc/ld.so-1.9.11/copyright /usr/share/man/man8/ldconfig.8.bz2 Have you noticed that something is seriously missing which is the libdl.so.1.9.5 or higher with the libdl.so.1 library? Reason is that I was building a new Mandrake Webserver using 7.2-Beta3 and noticed that Frontpage will not work unless this specific library is in. So...how about fixing that little item? I am going to give to Jean the updated Frontpage RPM Package which will work with the 7.2 Apache due to little change in the user ownership. -- Linux Support Administrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] ld.so.conf Gepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] /usr/X11R6/lib [...] /usr/X11R6/lib those blasted /usr/X11R6/lib's just keep coming ! our XFree86 specialist seems to have some pb with grep: pixel@leia:~rpm -q --scripts XFree86-libs | head -4 postinstall script (through /bin/sh): if grep "^/usr/X11R6/lib$" /etc/ld.so.conf /dev/null 21; then echo "/usr/X11R6/lib" /etc/ld.so.conf fi i think adding /usr/X11R6/lib when it's already there is not the right thing to do ;pp Owen Scared me that /usr/lib wasn't listed in my config, and you seem to have two ;) you don't need /usr/lib, see ldconfig(8) ___ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
[Cooker] FP Extensions Support Update
Hey Jean. I am wondering if you are considering replacing the default patches and such that came with Frontpage for Unix in favor of the Improved_Mod_Frontpage, which I been hearing that is much better. Plus, that there is a update release of the FP 2000 for Unix as well. Any chance of seeing the updates for those? If you need a hand, let me know and I see what I can do. -- Linux Support Adminstrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd.
[expert] Status of Using the Mandrake 7.0 / 7.1
I figures I drop in a line about the current status of using Mandrake for production servers. I am currently using three servers, with the following configurations as follows: Pentium III 500Mhz, 256 Meg of Ram, 15 Gigs Drives. Here is what I have configured on those three bad ass monsters: Apache 1.3.12 - Provided by Jean with the MySQL Database, PHP4, formerly 3, Perl, Frontpage, Tomcat 3.2-Beta4, IBM Java 1.1.3, Qmail 1.03 with Vpopmail and Qmailadmin and SSH. And the result? I currently have over 6482 domains hosted on all servers, with 1142 on Unixhost 1, 1328 on Unixhost2 and 5392 on Unixhost3. If you are wondering why I have such a huge number on Unixhost3, it is due to the fact that Unixhost1 and 2 are moved servers from leased servers to our home brewed server and transferred the files over from there, which include removing Sendmail crap and other custom crap for clean installation. Unixhost3 is built from scratch and built up from there...and it is humming along nicely on Unixhost3with 8 high volume websites on Unixhost3, which averages around 40,000 hits per day on those specific sites and overall, 900,000 hits per day for everything combined on Unixhost3. Now...do you think that is little unbelievable or not? It was not possible with Redhat back then, but with this Mandrake system, I was able to cram so much and still have it run along with such aplomb with no problems at all. Now I am currently building a new server with 700Mhz system with 384Meg of Memory and 30 Gig drive to handle even larger influx of websites and to move some high traffic sites off to there. Anyone dare claim even bigger piece of pie of what Mandrake can do? I think mine is nuts, but works like a charm though. Hell... even my boss and the co-location facility who hosts it is amazed by it. :) So in words... keep up good work guys! --Linux Support AdminstratorRussell "Elik" RademacherDelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd.
[Cooker] PHP4.01 and JServ Comments
Ouch... So... how long do you think we need to wait and which packages are needed to be fixed for the PHP4.01 version to be considered stable so that I can put it in the 7.0 and 7.1 Mandrake Servers. I noticed that some mentioned about upgrading the Perl to 5.6 which is not a problem for me. But I want to make sure that the MySQL modules itself along with perl is working before I upgrade those. Other than that... everything else seems peachy on the servers. Just waiting for the upgrade of the PHP from 3 to 4 so that I can considered this done. BTW... I noticed that some people have mentioned problems with the JServ module under Apache. I got it working, after recompiling the JServ module with the -DEAPI gcc setting to make it work properly under the Apache 1.3.12 Mandrake version. And it works nicely. So... I might consider making a RPM package but I do not know how to do it in the first place. So...any pointers or such is helpful so I can make one and release it to the Cooker for anyone who is interested in it. It works with SSL and everything else that I got. I am thinking of trying to see if I can get TomCat to work, but frankly...their setup is nuts. Total departure of the regular Autoconf and Build setup in favor of whatever they are making. But I think I can get it working in a bit after I figure out how they make their modules. Also... for the Java System, I am using the IBM 1.1.3 JDK version in case you are wondering how I got the JServ to work. -- Linux Support Adminstrator Russell "Elik" Rademacher DelhiNet Web Services, Pvt Ltd. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chmouel Boudjnah Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jean-Michel Dault Subject: Re: [Cooker] mod_php-mysql bad Sylvain COTINEAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OF !! I'm not the only one ! Someone in cooker team can do something pleaaz ! :-( I beleive we have to wait the return of the JMD jedi :-( -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel
[Cooker] MySQL Client Program Problems.
Hello Guys. I am not sure if you know about this but I use the mysql_setpermission files quite often. However...the RPMS that I have gotten recently which is 3.22.32 version, it have client version of 9.38 or something. Now...here is the problem I came across when I tried to use it. I type in the command to start and after giving the correct password, this is what I get back. [root@unixhost1 bin]# mysql_setpermission Password for user to connect to MySQL: Can't make a connection to the mysql server. The error: Protocol mismatch. Server Version = 10 Client Version = 9 at /usr/bin/mysql_setpermission line 65, STDIN chunk 1. [root@unixhost1 bin]# I cannot figure out how to solve this, but I really need this fixed ASAP, since I use them to do the quick add of the mysql databases for our customers and after this upgrade...well.. I am really up the creek here. Any help is appreciated.
[Cooker] JServ or Jakarta
Okay guys. I been at the hair end and frankly, I would like to propose a challenge to all for this little dilemma. If anyone have successfully complied and have the JServ or Jakarta running on Mandrake 7.02 using the Secured Kernel Version, I would like to offer that winner a year free of WebHosting with 250 Megs of space on our server with no strings tied except for adult content stuff. That means you can put many domains or such under the allocated space of 250 Megs on it. So to make this happens, I would like anyone who have successfully installed the Mandrake 7.02 and the JServ with the Apache additions that is found at http://coruscant.netrevolution.com/pub/AES/, which includes the following: SSL, Extranet, MySQL and such, except for the Streaming Server. So. if anyone can get that to work, I need all the documentations and steps on how this is accomplished so I can verify it and have it running on the server. When it is checked out, then that winner will get that prize. So...if anyone take it up, get cracking on this. If you have any questions, please send those questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you and hopefully, we can get this resolved. The rules of the contest is very simple and clear. Not on Redhat, not on Debian or anything but on Mandrake 7.02, the latest version there is, with Secured Kernel Version running on it.
[Cooker] FYI: Secure kernel install
Hello. Have anyone noticed that if you are using the Secure Kernel version, you cannot go beyond 56 IP addresses on one network card? Not sure if this is the feature or not, but I was able to cram up to 200 IP addresses on one network card, but not with 7.02 Secure Kernel version. Anyone have simliar problems with this?
[Cooker] Jserv and Java Problems
Have anyone have any success compiling the JServ and making it work under Mandrake 7.0 using either Blackdown, IBM or Sun Java binaries from 1.1.7 to 1.2.2 at all? Reason is that I got it installed and when I tried to run it, it just do not run at all, which is baffling me...and I haven't got any help from Jean-Michel on this subject or either people at Java Apache, which all says recomplie the Apache and use it. And frankly, I have done all of that, and nothing still works. That is the biggest problem here. I know it worked under Mandrake 6.1 but not under Mandrake 7.0. So... how about some invegistating to see what we can find to squash this problem.
[Cooker] Apache - JServ Problems
Hello all. I currently have problems with the Apache Server with the JServ added to it. It seems that it does not like each other due to the fact that the JServ do not work with the Apache as it is. Have anyone have any success on making the JServ work with the Apache at this time, with any documentations on this? - This mail sent through IMP: http://web.horde.org/imp/
