[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi All,

I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
location to download systemvm templates:

http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/

Regards.

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[David Nalley]

Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[David Nalley]

Hi All,

I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Nux!]

+1 (binding) from me based on testing upgrades from 4.4.1/4.4.3 and basic 
operations in Adv+SG zones.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 4 May, 2015 12:20:31
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> 
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
> location to download systemvm templates:
> 
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> 
> Regards.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rene Moser]

Hi

Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
schema-430to440.sql

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464

Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really
sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.

It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.

Yours
René

On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> 
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
> location to download systemvm templates:
> 
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> 
> Regards.
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Daan Hoogland]

Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.

Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :

> Hi
>
> Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
> ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> schema-430to440.sql
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
>
> Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really
> sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
>
> It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
>
> Yours
> René
>
> On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> >
> > List of changes:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
> > location to download systemvm templates:
> >
> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> >
> > Regards.
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Rene,

Thanks for reporting. I’ve just deployed a ACS 4.2.1 DB and upgraded to ACS 
4.5.1, and found no exceptions.

Did you try this on a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 or was it CCP 4.2.1? (in 
production we have seen db upgrade issues if customers were using CCP 4.2.x or 
4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x or later). The alter statements are on two 
different tables (cloud_usage and usage_vm_instance) so ideally won’t cause 
conflicts unless the columns were already altered due to one of the above 
issues.

> On 05-May-2015, at 3:47 pm, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
> Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
> would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
> hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
>> ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
>> schema-430to440.sql
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
>>
>> Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really
>> sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
>>
>> It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
>>
>> Yours
>> René
>>
>> On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
>>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>>
>>> List of changes:
>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
>>> location to download systemvm templates:
>>>
>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>
>>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Marcus]

This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
all known bugs before shipping.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
> would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
> hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
> > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> > schema-430to440.sql
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> >
> > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really
> > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> >
> > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> >
> > Yours
> > René
> >
> > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > >
> > > List of changes:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
> > > location to download systemvm templates:
> > >
> > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Daan Hoogland]

sure, hence the -0

Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :

> This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
> that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
> been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
> all known bugs before shipping.
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
> > Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
> > would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
> > hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
> >
> > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
> identical
> > > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> > > schema-430to440.sql
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> > >
> > > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not
> really
> > > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> > >
> > > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> > >
> > > Yours
> > > René
> > >
> > > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > vote:
> > > >
> > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > > >
> > > > List of changes:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> > > >
> > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > location):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > > >
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories
> and
> > > > location to download systemvm templates:
> > > >
> > > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> > > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> > > >
> > > > Regards.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Marcus]

Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt
server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more
generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known
or existing issues.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
>
> > This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
> > that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
> > been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
> > all known bugs before shipping.
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
> > > would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
> > > hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
> > >
> > > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
> > identical
> > > > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> > > > schema-430to440.sql
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> > > >
> > > > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not
> > really
> > > > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> > > >
> > > > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> > > >
> > > > Yours
> > > > René
> > > >
> > > > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > > vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > > > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > > > >
> > > > > List of changes:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> > > > >
> > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > > location):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > > > >
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories
> > and
> > > > > location to download systemvm templates:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> > > > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I have not had chance to test yet as in the middle of a big Government Cloud 
Project, but agree with Marcus around voting.

A "-1" should only be cast (in my personal opinion) if we see a serious 
regression or there is a major bug in a new feature.

If the regression has the potential to 'break' existing deployments then it’s a 
-1.

If the new feature has a major bug then we should either fix the new feature, 
or pull it from the release.

Again only my personal opinions, but just wanted to chuck them out there.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 May 2015 16:23
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt 
server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more 
generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known or 
existing issues.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
>
> > This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can
> > prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0
> > and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather
> > than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping.
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange
> > > that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or
> > > in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
> > >
> > > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
> > identical
> > > > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql
> > > > and schema-430to440.sql
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db
> /db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db
> /db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> > > >
> > > > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update.
> > > > Not
> > really
> > > > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> > > >
> > > > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> > > >
> > > > Yours
> > > > René
> > > >
> > > > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up
> > > > > for a
> > > vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.5
> > > > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > > > >
> > > > > List of changes:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T12
> > > > > 17
> > > > >
> > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> > > > > same
> > > > > location):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > > > >
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be
> > > > > sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > For convenience of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

In case anyone did not see my previous reply - I’m unable to reproduce the 
shared issue using ACS 4.2.1 and upgrading it to 4.5.1. So, kindly test for any 
issues before voting.

> On 05-May-2015, at 5:13 pm, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
>
>> This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
>> that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
>> been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
>> all known bugs before shipping.
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
>>> would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
>>> hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
>>>
>>> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
>>>
 Hi

 Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
>> identical
 ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
 schema-430to440.sql



>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787



>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464

 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not
>> really
 sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.

 It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.

 Yours
 René

 On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>

>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>
> List of changes:
>

>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories
>> and
> location to download systemvm templates:
>
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>
> Regards.
>


>>>
>>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Daan Hoogland]

Hey, no body casted a -1!

I will probably not be testing in time and won't stop this release for that
reason. if it works for anyone it should go out. If it doesn't work for me
I'll call for a fix. The CCP issue, I didn't know about. I don't think we
should abandon CCP users so a repair script should be made and the upgrade
marked as no go in our matrix.

Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:23 schreef Marcus :

> Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
> There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt
> server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more
> generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known
> or existing issues.
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
> > sure, hence the -0
> >
> > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
> >
> > > This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can
> prove
> > > that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
> > > been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to
> fix
> > > all known bugs before shipping.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that
> it
> > > > would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I
> am
> > > > hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
> > > >
> > > > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
> > > identical
> > > > > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> > > > > schema-430to440.sql
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> > > > >
> > > > > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not
> > > really
> > > > > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours
> > > > > René
> > > > >
> > > > > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up
> for a
> > > > vote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > > > > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > > > > >
> > > > > > List of changes:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> same
> > > > > > location):
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
> to
> > > > > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For convenience of testing, you may use the following
> repositories
> > > and
> > > > > > location to download systemvm templates:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> > > > > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)

Tested following vm lifecycle operations and other events;

- DB upgrade testing from ACS 4.2.1, 4.3.2, 4.5.0 to ACS 4.5.1 candiate
- Deploy zone, register primary/secondary storage pools, add/remove hosts
- Register iso and template
- Take snapshot, convert snapshot to volume/template, download 
template/snapshot/iso
- Deploy VM using iso and template
- Start, restart, stop, destroy/expunge VM
- Password server and reset password feature (including load testing the 
password server with upto 1k QPS)
- Local storage, storage migration across hosts and storage pool
- Use local storage option for systemvm on zone basis
- VM migration (in case of XenServer only)

The following environment combinations were tested (using a nest virtualized 
environment running on KVM):

1. KVM (Ubuntu 14.04.2):
- KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Basic Zone (no SG)
- KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Basic Zone + with SG (tested ingress/egress rules)
- KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Adv Zone + no SG (tested pf/lb/firewall rules, 
snat IP, VPC, VPN)
- KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Adv Zone + with SG (tested ingress/egress rules, 
VPC, VPN)

2. XenServer:
- XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) +  Basic Zone (no SG)
- XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) +  Basic Zone with SG (tested ingress/egress rules)
- XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) +  Adv Zone (no SG) (tested pf/lb/firewall rules, 
snat IP, VPC, VPN)
- XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) +  Adv Zone with SG (tested ingress/egress rules, 
VPC, VPN)

3. VMWare; (ESX 5.5.0 update1 with vCenter server 5.5.0 update1 on Windows 
Server 2008 R2 SP1)
- VMWare + Basic zone (note: SG is not supported on vmware, so only basic zone 
was tested)
- VMWare + Adv zone (tested few basic ingress/egress rules)
Notes: ESXi with vCenter did not work for me on KVM (I tried 5.0, 5.1, 5.5 
up1/up2), I kept getting vmodl.fault.HostCommunication errors when adding the 
esxi host to vCenter. Apparently, ESXi 6.0 worked with vCenter all running on 
KVM (qemu 2.2) but unfortunately I could n’t test with it as vCenter/ESXi 6.0 
not supported by ACS yet. I was able to test the above with running 
ESXi/vCenter 5.5.0up1 setup on VMWare Fusion with the mgmt server running on 
OSX. In my case the secondary storage had to be mounted locally on /mnt/sec 
(also shared by Mike couple of months ago on some thread) as it failed creation 
of ssvms.

Packaging testing:
- On CentOS7 or CentOS6 with java-1.8.0-openjdk installed, installation fails 
with conflict statements so admins know they need to remove jdk 1.8; openjdk 
1.7 is installed with agent/mgmt/usage packages
- Installations on Ubuntu/Debian would stop tomcat6 (so it won’t conflict with 
mgmt server)
- CentOS 6/7 packages install without issues on CentOS 6.5, 7.1 and Fedora 20 
(use EL7 repo for F20), but it fails for Fedora 21 (due to no openjdk 1.7 
package).
- Debian packages worked on Ubuntu 14.04, 14.10 and on Debian7 but not on 
systemd based Ubuntu 15.04 server or Debian 8.0

Other remarks:
- VPN for VPC/isolated network works on Windows, but is broken on OSX [due to 
openswan limitation - nothing can be do; we can either support OSX (with forced 
nat option) but that breaks Windows clients]
- In case of both Xen and KVM, if vlan was not vlan://untagged in Adv zone with 
SG I was unable to access any VMs (as I could n’t understand how to configure 
vlans in test environment which running hosts in VMs as nested VMs on a KVM 
host). Though in case of vlan://untagged (in Adv zone + SG), it seems to work 
but with no vlan tagging it beats the purpose
- Fixed a minor packaging issue on 4.5 when installing both mgmt server and 
agent, they would both create /var/log/cloudstack/agent and thus fail the last 
package from being installed.


> On 04-May-2015, at 8:44 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) from me based on testing upgrades from 4.4.1/4.4.3 and basic 
> operations in Adv+SG zones.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 4 May, 2015 12:20:31
>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>
>> List of changes:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/clo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rene Moser]

Hi

I am not able to reproduce anymore.

vote 0 from me!

Yours
René

Am 5. Mai 2015 17:02:47 MESZ, schrieb Marcus :
>This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can
>prove
>that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
>been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to
>fix
>all known bugs before shipping.
>
>On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland 
>wrote:
>
>> Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that
>it
>> would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I
>am
>> hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
>>
>> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
>identical
>> > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
>> > schema-430to440.sql
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
>> >
>> > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not
>really
>> > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
>> >
>> > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
>> >
>> > Yours
>> > René
>> >
>> > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for
>a
>> vote:
>> > >
>> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> > >
>> >
>>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
>> > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>> > >
>> > > List of changes:
>> > >
>> >
>>
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
>> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>> > >
>> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
>same
>> > > location):
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>> > >
>> > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
>to
>> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1  approve
>> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> > >
>> > > For convenience of testing, you may use the following
>repositories and
>> > > location to download systemvm templates:
>> > >
>> > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>> > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>> > >
>> > > Regards.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Somesh Naidu]

> CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x

There is no such upgrade path.
 
Regards,
Somesh


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Rene,

Thanks for reporting. I’ve just deployed a ACS 4.2.1 DB and upgraded to ACS 
4.5.1, and found no exceptions.

Did you try this on a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 or was it CCP 4.2.1? (in 
production we have seen db upgrade issues if customers were using CCP 4.2.x or 
4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x or later). The alter statements are on two 
different tables (cloud_usage and usage_vm_instance) so ideally won’t cause 
conflicts unless the columns were already altered due to one of the above 
issues.

> On 05-May-2015, at 3:47 pm, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
> Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
> would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
> hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
>> ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
>> schema-430to440.sql
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
>>
>> Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really
>> sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
>>
>> It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
>>
>> Yours
>> René
>>
>> On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
>>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>>
>>> List of changes:
>>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
>>> location to download systemvm templates:
>>>
>>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1vX318gyxL4Oe_mcG02NfiWqimjUBdOtkVeHs9W17sQLcJAZyYirdUOSCa0McOXHpb1XP0jGEX3VBxsj66GV6pOoQ7tvib63bdzWyl8NZkaeZSTnecYWadC9AsZleVsQWdN0GPWwogqO5s6T2XctNWl2Boy8sULvDB8DaA8SuV1aDoD_jJL-Iv1o7VBKlMeok/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack%2Ftesting%2F
>>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1fQSBXRwcrmw1AEPk8-GQY0qtbJaJXTTTXUYkHdEmysbMTQ4BNC0nH_5btdDBbi7n4v1kePAl0mI8_2qstKq6mx6xwknEdWOBXowed7JCXUT1PuqbcfRHDWRlMheLKUBer9nngthDuBxA-kEDY00HnQxfHk1NG1bClrI0Q1FCc0qyFyJ1mYRKaCDhSjr_oNVo/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fsystemvmtemplate%2F4.5%2F
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>
>>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & 
Build<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1xVV_M7hhnn8cgGg61N2LyuxSk0GPg-YpBXFY4qSnYXN8ZICBbfyjajnvXqN_wSdwFsetkR1bBWF1zFslosw3dv-8wvy-9PkeJY6K5cXHZoHCH57WMrj5WEEaVhNhDjcpBMWnZjgmexEVJN-QwK-WCZpH5QAo3K68EUaKI8A7ws5ILPj4-rwlFJV3Rkpprwef/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment 
framework<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1n4gQ-oLFtPfblmUSTZNtAU7AmfO2LAHSWvT7szlmeSAd_wDb0VC4jaY73TSaT6OMDG4I65_jrCUsuXelqffo6d2hQia1H2tr6EIO3-hfsrVj3H9rAad-sKZSiTI6Mj7FRfIEjjQ9nC-Y0CZg_NtbIezk2V6t2TOphxIPnSdijmwrYnEEW3AteVg1W0MqABm0/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F>
CloudStack 
Consulting<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1Q4T9A-00nBO5sNHhLN_4rkNULddNsmcMwAzPgw5W3M8jdW2aD1v7cZtw-BEjhdFFNkbLpdQM02QPAtPOi5

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Somesh Naidu]

Agree with Marcus. I believe the workaround to the issue pointed out by Rene 
should be straightforward and could be documented.

Regards,
Somesh


-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 11:23 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt
server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more
generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known
or existing issues.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
>
> > This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
> > that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
> > been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
> > all known bugs before shipping.
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
> > > would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
> > > hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
> > >
> > > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
> > identical
> > > > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> > > > schema-430to440.sql
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> > > >
> > > > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not
> > really
> > > > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> > > >
> > > > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> > > >
> > > > Yours
> > > > René
> > > >
> > > > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> > > vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > > > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > > > >
> > > > > List of changes:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> > > > >
> > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > > location):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > > > >
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories
> > and
> > > > > location to download systemvm templates:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1b1vlXKxcmtbajS10D8YjJtCJx9gLBtS6uOu-s_0Nw0eNnKs55Iui3WsTAH5g2cTnFi0rtNEkv7MdwjwLPceAcBrI6OJG-FrTx8FgWDE11d6A2TelB07RII9VrJoZ1IPaash5qBEx0bUxhcKZWJUZ9FetzYvHfNgtMfDCBhzzfPnjm52KTP9OR1wQuC45gbpt/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack%2Ftesting%2F
> > > > > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mr_7sYWtvS-bituPzxPKg1YPOAZ7qsBSZstvdrgBGOlvmXxA831h8hOtHuYcaMznbm7dnwVYvk1Nd6MprUXIhLm6ZRequo7lr86ynjgadz5gP6qar5vsS1MOmeM5CmS_7qs1rvEatWEvlS0acpvGerOwJDn26OuhPJIcceGvFv9Pz1OgOi0rDC5_aB3fsmUY/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fsystemvmtemplate%2F4.5%2F
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Somesh,

> On 05-May-2015, at 5:39 pm, Somesh Naidu  wrote:
>
>> CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x
>
> There is no such upgrade path.

You’re missing the context :)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[David Nalley]

Thanks for running with this Rohit.

+1 (binding)

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
> location to download systemvm templates:
>
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>
> Regards.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Marcus]

+1 (binding)
On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:

> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5
> > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> >
> > List of changes:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
> > location to download systemvm templates:
> >
> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
> >
> > Regards.
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)

I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer
build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs
upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.

We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but
it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0
for now

Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups
build, in for a busy week!

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru


ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:

>+1 (binding)
>On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>vote:
>> >
>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=ref
>>s/heads/4.5
>> > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>> >
>> > List of changes:
>> >
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=C
>>HANGES.md;hb=4.5
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>> >
>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> > location):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
>> > location to download systemvm templates:
>> >
>> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>> >
>> > Regards.
>>

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Hi,

I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it seems 
VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and 
using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers  at 
the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject 
"VPC usage scenario"

Regards,

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)

I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build.  
In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, 
however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.

We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it 
could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now

Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
build, in for a busy week!

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com  
| Twitter:@cloudstackguru <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS 





On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:

>+1 (binding)
>On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>vote:
>> >
>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
>>ref
>>s/heads/4.5
>> > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>> >
>> > List of changes:
>> >
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
>>f=C
>>HANGES.md;hb=4.5
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>> >
>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> > location):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
>> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories 
>> > and location to download systemvm templates:
>> >
>> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>> >
>> > Regards.
>>

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[sebgoa]

On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>   I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,


Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. 
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test
This is very important .

> but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at 
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from 
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at 
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> 

Did you report bugs ? 

> Regards,
> 
> Vadim.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> 
> I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> 
> I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. 
>  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded 
> OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
> 
> We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it 
> could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now
> 
> Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
> build, in for a busy week!
> 
> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
>  | M: +447968161581 
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com 
>  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru 
> <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
> 
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>>>> 
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
>>> ref
>>> s/heads/4.5
>>>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>>> 
>>>> List of changes:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
>>> f=C
>>> HANGES.md;hb=4.5
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>>>> 
>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>> location):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>>>> 
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>> 
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>> 
>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> 
>>>> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories 
>>>> and location to download systemvm templates:
>>>> 
>>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>>>> 
>>>> Regards.
>>> 
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Erik Weber]

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it
> seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
>
>

Did it work in 4.5.0?

-- 
Erik

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that 
it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to 
troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know 
where to start.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1


On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>   I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,


Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. 
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test 
This is very important .

> but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at 
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from 
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at 
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> 

Did you report bugs ? 

> Regards,
> 
> Vadim.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> 
> I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> 
> I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. 
>  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded 
> OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
> 
> We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, 
> but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence 
> the -0 for now
> 
> Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
> build, in for a busy week!
> 
> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
>  | M: +447968161581 
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com 
>  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru 
> <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
> 
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>>>> 
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
>>> h=
>>> ref
>>> s/heads/4.5
>>>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>>> 
>>>> List of changes:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai
>>> n;
>>> f=C
>>> HANGES.md;hb=4.5
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>>>> 
>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>> location):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>>>> 
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>> 
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>> 
>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> 
>>>> For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories 
>>>> and location to download systemvm templates:
>>>> 
>>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>>>> 
>>>> Regards.
>>> 
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
> services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & 
> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment 
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering<http://sha

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Vadim,

My first question is why would you want to?

The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs 
to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.

However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a 
VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the 
other tier.

It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting 
DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.

However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, 
with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.

Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 
'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier.

If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then 
consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network.  
I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this 
works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to 
communicate over the required protocols etc.

Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a 
regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first 
place.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that 
it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to 
troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know 
where to start.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1


On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,


Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test 
This is very important .

> but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at 
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from 
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at 
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
>

Did you report bugs ?

> Regards,
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
>
> I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. 
>  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded 
> OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
>
> We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1,
> but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence
> the -0 for now
>
> Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
> build, in for a busy week!
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
>  | M: +447968161581 
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
>  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
>
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> 
>
>
>
>
> On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>> On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>>>>
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
>>> h=
>>> ref
>>> s/heads/4.5
>>>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai
>>> n;
>>> f=C
>>> HANGES.md;hb

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Daan Hoogland]

Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this
purpose. Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use
> ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to
> each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both
> getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each
> VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion
> it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each
> Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then
> consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared
> network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to
> allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this
> as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the
> first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't
> know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help
> test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> >
> > I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> >
> > I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer
> build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs
> upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
> >
> > We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1,
> > but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence
> > the -0 for now
> >
> > Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security
> Groups build, in for a busy week!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> >  | M: +447968161581 
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
> >  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> > <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
> >
> > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >> On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for running with this Ro

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Geoff,

Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have 
(for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers have to 
communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world.  The 
easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need 
to send all the requests to VPC router. Don't know if it does any benefit in a 
term of "VR load".   I do agree that isolation model of VPC is more strict and 
clean.  Prevents from such "backdors" to happen.  I just got wrong feeling, 
that such scenario is also supported, because it works unless I reboot.  I also 
agree with your comments and will not consider this as an issue anymore.  Thank 
you for detailed explaination - this is what I have been looking for.   I have 
no issues for 4.5.1 to happen.

Regards,

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. 
Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and 
> use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by 
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC 
> to each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and 
> both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for 
> each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my 
> opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the 
> VMs on each Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs 
> then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or 
> shared network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested 
> again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs 
> to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see 
> this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported 
> configuration in the first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but 
> don't know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and 
> help test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 
> > 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs 
> from different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem 
> desctiption at user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> >
> > I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> >
> > I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv 
> > XenServer
> build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and 
&

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Daan,

Private gateway is not for this purpose, but let's not confuse this thread, we 
can discuss it in more detail over a beer at the next User Group (far more fun)

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. 
Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and
> use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC
> to each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and
> both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for
> each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my
> opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the
> VMs on each Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs
> then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or
> shared network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested
> again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs
> to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see
> this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported
> configuration in the first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but
> don't know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and
> help test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have
> > 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs
> from different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem
> desctiption at user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> >
> > I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> >
> > I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv
> > XenServer
> build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and
> VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
> >
> > We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a
> > -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc
> > hence the -0 for now
> >
> > Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security
> Groups build, in for a busy week!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> >  | M: +447968161581 
> &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Erik Weber]

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers
> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside
> world.
>
The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.


But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully
accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the
web servers, and not just the database.

The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix
the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as
well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.

-- 

Erik

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers
> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> outside world.
>
The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.


But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully 
accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web 
servers, and not just the database.

The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the 
scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you 
create two tiers and put a firewall between them.

--

Erik
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Hi all,

I'm glad to let you know that ACS 4.5.1 has my +1.

Environment:

XenServer 6.2
MySQL/MariaDB 5.5.41
Management Server running CentOS 7
Component: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack (test/integration/component and 
smoke)

Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain ... === TestName: 
test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify Non Root admin previleges ... === TestName: 
test_01_non_root_admin_Privileges | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Remove one user from the account ... === TestName: 
test_01_user_remove_VM_running | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify service offerings at same level in hierarchy ... === TestName: 
test_01_service_offering_hierarchy | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify service offerings at same level in hierarchy ... === TestName: 
test_01_service_offering_siblings | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify template at same level in hierarchy ... === TestName: 
test_01_template_hierarchy | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 14 tests in 1427.942s

OK
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_accounts_YP0DGH/results.txt


Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for 
migration
Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 10 tests in 731.034s

OK (SKIP=1)
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_vm_life_cycle_F4OCL2/results.txt


Trying SSH Connection: Host:192.168.22.10 User:root 
  Port:22 RetryCnt:60===
===SSH to Host 192.168.22.10 port : 22 SUCCESSFUL===
{Cmd: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -ostricthostkeychecking=no 
-oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p 3922 169.254.0.25 service dnsmasq status via 
Host: 192.168.22.10} {returns: [u'Checking DNS forwarder and DHCP server: 
dnsmasq(running).']}
Trying SSH Connection: Host:192.168.22.10 User:root 
  Port:22 RetryCnt:60===
Trying SSH Connection: Host:192.168.22.10 User:root 
  Port:22 RetryCnt:60===
===SSH to Host 192.168.22.10 port : 22 SUCCESSFUL===
===SSH to Host 192.168.22.10 port : 22 SUCCESSFUL===
{Cmd: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -ostricthostkeychecking=no 
-oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p 3922 169.254.0.25 service haproxy status via 
Host: 192.168.22.10} {returns: [u'haproxy is running.']}
{Cmd: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -ostricthostkeychecking=no 
-oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p 3922 169.254.0.25 service haproxy status via 
Host: 192.168.22.10} {returns: [u'haproxy is running.']}
Test router internal advanced zone ... === TestName: 
test_02_router_internal_adv | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok

--
Ran 7 tests in 400.284s

OK
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_routers_PUL0VN/results.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a 
'+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the 
threads

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers
> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> outside world.
>
The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.


But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully 
accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web 
servers, and not just the database.

The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the 
scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you 
create two tiers and put a firewall between them.

--

Erik
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Daan Hoogland]

based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test
env i will +1(binding)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with
> a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of
> mixing the threads
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
> > wrote:
>
> > Geoff,
> >
> > Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> > have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier
> servers
> > have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> > outside world.
> >
> The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> > without need to send all the requests to VPC router.
>
>
> But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully
> accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the
> web servers, and not just the database.
>
> The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix
> the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as
> well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.
>
> --
>
> Erik
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please 
test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs 
as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then 
fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i 
will +1(binding)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements
> with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the
> problem of mixing the threads
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
> > wrote:
>
> > Geoff,
> >
> > Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> > have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier
> servers
> > have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> > outside world.
> >
> The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> > without need to send all the requests to VPC router.
>
>
> But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now
> fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to)
> through the web servers, and not just the database.
>
> The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and
> fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud
> world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.
>
> --
>
> Erik
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
> Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> htt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Wilder Rodrigues]

Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.

I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.

Cheers,
Wilder

> On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
> 
> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible 
> please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and 
> new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, 
> but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
> 
> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> 
> based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env 
> i will +1(binding)
> 
> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
> 
>> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements
>> with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the
>> problem of mixing the threads
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>> 
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>> 
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> 
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>> 
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>> 
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>> 
>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
>> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Geoff,
>>> 
>>>Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
>>> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier
>> servers
>>> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
>>> outside world.
>>> 
>> The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
>>> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.
>> 
>> 
>> But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now
>> fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to)
>> through the web servers, and not just the database.
>> 
>> The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and
>> fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud
>> world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Erik
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>> services
>> 
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
>> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
>> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
>> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
>> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
>> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
>> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
>> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
>> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
>> Pty Lt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Nux!]

Geoff,

I always test upgrades (from whatever versions we have in prod) and no 
problems, but I only run Adv+SG zone..
I can destroy/create system VMs without problem.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Geoff Higginbottom" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May, 2015 13:28:55
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible 
> please
> test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs
> as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then
> fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
> 
> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> 
> based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env 
> i
> will +1(binding)
> 
> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
> 
>> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements
>> with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the
>> problem of mixing the threads
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
>> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > Geoff,
>> >
>> > Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
>> > have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier
>> servers
>> > have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
>> > outside world.
>> >
>> The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
>> > without need to send all the requests to VPC router.
>>
>>
>> But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now
>> fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to)
>> through the web servers, and not just the database.
>>
>> The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and
>> fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud
>> world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Erik
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>> services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
>> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
>> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
>> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
>> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
>> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
>> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Marcus]

There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is
simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for
performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup
tier, for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the
vpc and some to not route, so you add a second nic to the systems you don't
want to route. Ultimately it comes down to "we can so why not allow the
flexibility?".

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use
> ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to
> each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both
> getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each
> VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion
> it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each
> Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then
> consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared
> network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to
> allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this
> as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the
> first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't
> know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help
> test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> >
> > I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> >
> > I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer
> build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs
> upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
> >
> > We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1,
> > but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence
> > the -0 for now
> >
> > Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security
> Groups build, in for a busy week!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> >  | M: +447968161581 
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
> >  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> > <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
> >
> > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 C

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Good news, we have found the cause of the problem I was experiencing with 
upgrade testing.  It appears that when you register the new system vm template 
in 4.3 or 4.4 using the UI, it sets the HVM flag to true.  As I was testing on 
a system using Nested Virtualisation which does not support HVM it caused it to 
fail post upgrade.  Clean installs of 4.5 do not set the HVM flag so they were 
working OK.

Rohit has identified the code to confirm this, and as this is just a quirk of 
my test environment I don’t see it as an issue (more from Rohit to follow 
shortly)

So in regards to testing upgrades from 4.2 and 4.3 things are looking good, 
just want to finish some more tests on Basic Zones with Security Groups before 
I cast my final vote.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 16:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is 
simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for 
performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup tier, 
for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the vpc and some 
to not route, so you add a second nic to the systems you don't want to route. 
Ultimately it comes down to "we can so why not allow the flexibility?".

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and
> use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC
> to each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and
> both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for
> each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my
> opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the
> VMs on each Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs
> then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or
> shared network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested
> again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs
> to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see
> this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported
> configuration in the first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but
> don't know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and
> help test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have
> > 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs
> from different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem
> desctiption at user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > S

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi all,

I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the 
issue Geoff reported.

The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When 
we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from 
UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance 
table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff 
was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that 
is HVM).

When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 
(false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading 
systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template 
(systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false 
for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can 
deselect the HVM option.

I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly 
using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v.

Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid.

> On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.
>
> I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>> On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible 
>> please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and 
>> new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial 
>> upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>
>> based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test 
>> env i will +1(binding)
>>
>> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
>>
>>> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements
>>> with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the
>>> problem of mixing the threads
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
>>> To: dev
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
>>> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Geoff,
>>>>
>>>>   Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
>>>> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier
>>> servers
>>>> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
>>>> outside world.
>>>>
>>> The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
>>>> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.
>>>
>>>
>>> But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now
>>> fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to)
>>> through the web servers, and not just the database.
>>>
>>> The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and
>>> fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud
>>> world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Erik
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>>> servic

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Abhinandan Prateek]

+1 with following testing:

Manual Testing:

Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
  VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
  VM Migration
  Affinity groups - anti affinity
  VM consoles
  VM and volume snapshots
  Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created 
form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot
  Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on 
UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448
  Resize volum, Download volume
  Snapshot policies
  Change password
  2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the 
same tier, VPC ACL

Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437

None of the issues are a blocker.

-abhi


> On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test 
> the issue Geoff reported.
>
> The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. 
> When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if 
> done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the 
> vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in 
> case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no 
> host found that is HVM).
>
> When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 
> 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when 
> registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the 
> next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like 
> cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has 
> been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option.
>
> I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly 
> using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v.
>
> Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid.
>
>> On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.
>>
>> I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>>
>>> On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible 
>>> please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and 
>>> new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial 
>>> upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>
>>> based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test 
>>> env i will +1(binding)
>>>
>>> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements
>>>> with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the
>>>> problem of mixing the threads
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>>
>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>>
>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
>>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>>
>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>>
>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
>>>> To: dev
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, V

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1 with the following testing

Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 
Hypervisors
Manual Tests via UI included
  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
  Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR
  Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR
  VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc)
  Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs
  Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and confirming 
storage clean-up

API Scripted tests included
  Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and NAT 
Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs


Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and 
AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors.  Dual Zone, with 
multiple PODs and Clusters.
Manual Tests included
  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
  Upgrade VRs as Root Admin
  Updating Security Groups
  Adding / Removing Static NAT
  Adding / Removing Load Balancing
  Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing
  Adding / Removing AutoScaling


Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1 with following testing:

Manual Testing:

Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
  VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
  VM Migration
  Affinity groups - anti affinity
  VM consoles
  VM and volume snapshots
  Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created 
form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot
  Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on 
UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448
  Resize volum, Download volume
  Snapshot policies
  Change password
  2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the 
same tier, VPC ACL

Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437

None of the issues are a blocker.

-abhi


> On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test 
> the issue Geoff reported.
>
> The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. 
> When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if 
> done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the 
> vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in 
> case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no 
> host found that is HVM).
>
> When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 
> 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when 
> registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the 
> next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like 
> cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has 
> been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option.
>
> I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly 
> using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v.
>
> Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid.
>
>> On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.
>>
>> I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>>
>>> On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if
>>> possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new
>>> Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades
>>> and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or
>>> new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>
>>> based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a
>>> test env i will +1(binding)
>>>
>>> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for confu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Andrija Panic]

While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)...

...  we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous
releases also (4.3.x):

Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451


After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do "netstat" on
VM that is behind VPC, and you don't see real client remote IP, you see
Source NAT IP of the VPC VR !

We isolated 1 problematic VR iptables rule - please check the issue...

Lot of software behind VPC become uselsess, firewall,
fail2ban,SIP/Asterisk/web server logs etc.. - since all connections from
internet through VPC seems to come from VR...

Thanks

On 7 May 2015 at 14:57, Geoff Higginbottom  wrote:

> +1 with the following testing
>
> Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2
> Hypervisors
> Manual Tests via UI included
>   Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
>   Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR
>   Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR
>   VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc)
>   Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs
>   Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and
> confirming storage clean-up
>
> API Scripted tests included
>   Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and
> NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs
>
>
> Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and
> AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors.  Dual Zone,
> with multiple PODs and Clusters.
> Manual Tests included
>   Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
>   Upgrade VRs as Root Admin
>   Updating Security Groups
>   Adding / Removing Static NAT
>   Adding / Removing Load Balancing
>   Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing
>   Adding / Removing AutoScaling
>
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> +1 with following testing:
>
> Manual Testing:
>
> Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
>   VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
>   VM Migration
>   Affinity groups - anti affinity
>   VM consoles
>   VM and volume snapshots
>   Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template
> created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot
>   Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper
> error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448
>   Resize volum, Download volume
>   Snapshot policies
>   Change password
>   2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in
> the same tier, VPC ACL
>
> Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437
>
> None of the issues are a blocker.
>
> -abhi
>
>
> > On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and
> test the issue Geoff reported.
> >
> > The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm
> flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to
> upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag
> to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM
> capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to
> start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM).
> >
> > When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is
> set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when
> registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register
> the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like
> cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has
> been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option.
> >
> > I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment,
> possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support
> vmx/amd-v.
> >
> > Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid.
> >
> >> On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.
> >>
> >> I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Wilder
> >>
> >>> On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Rene,

The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 cloud 
database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to upgrade to 
ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already 4.5.1). This 
could probably be the case in your environment as well that caused those 
failures for you. I tested db upgrades today from ACS and CCP 4.2 and 4.3 
versions to ACS 4.5.1 on MySQL 5.5 and 5.6, and I think they work out of the 
box with no changes needed.

> On 05-May-2015, at 1:01 pm, Rene Moser  wrote:
>
> Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
> ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
> schema-430to440.sql
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
>
> Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really
> sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
>
> It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Andrija,

> On 07-May-2015, at 3:08 pm, Andrija Panic  wrote:
>
> While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)…

You and anyone in the community are welcome to vote and discuss issues.

> ...  we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous
> releases also (4.3.x):
>
> Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451

The issue is by design and I imagine would haved existed in all 4.2+. But, 
since it does not introduce any regression or breaking feature/design I think 
we can try to address this as a design improvement in 4.5.2 or 4.6.0.

Regards.

> After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do "netstat" on
> VM that is behind VPC, and you don't see real client remote IP, you see
> Source NAT IP of the VPC VR !
>
> We isolated 1 problematic VR iptables rule - please check the issue...
>
> Lot of software behind VPC become uselsess, firewall,
> fail2ban,SIP/Asterisk/web server logs etc.. - since all connections from
> internet through VPC seems to come from VR...
>
> Thanks
>
> On 7 May 2015 at 14:57, Geoff Higginbottom > wrote:
>
>> +1 with the following testing
>>
>> Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2
>> Hypervisors
>> Manual Tests via UI included
>>  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
>>  Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR
>>  Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR
>>  VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc)
>>  Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs
>>  Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and
>> confirming storage clean-up
>>
>> API Scripted tests included
>>  Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and
>> NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs
>>
>>
>> Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and
>> AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors.  Dual Zone,
>> with multiple PODs and Clusters.
>> Manual Tests included
>>  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
>>  Upgrade VRs as Root Admin
>>  Updating Security Groups
>>  Adding / Removing Static NAT
>>  Adding / Removing Load Balancing
>>  Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing
>>  Adding / Removing AutoScaling
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56
>> To: CloudStack Dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>
>> +1 with following testing:
>>
>> Manual Testing:
>>
>> Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
>>  VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
>>  VM Migration
>>  Affinity groups - anti affinity
>>  VM consoles
>>  VM and volume snapshots
>>  Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template
>> created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot
>>  Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper
>> error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448
>>  Resize volum, Download volume
>>  Snapshot policies
>>  Change password
>>  2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in
>> the same tier, VPC ACL
>>
>> Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437
>>
>> None of the issues are a blocker.
>>
>> -abhi
>>
>>
>>> On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and
>> test the issue Geoff reported.
>>>
>>> The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm
>> flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to
>> upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag
>> to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM
>> capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to
>> start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM).
>>>
>>> When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is
>> set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when
>> registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register
>> the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xense

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi all,

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with
Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan)

+1 (non binding)
3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi)

0
none

-1
none

Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one :)

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give 
the mirrors time to catch up.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/fosggwzoyjuchvfq

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rene Moser]

Hi Rohit

On 07.05.2015 15:09, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Rene,
> 
> The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 
> cloud database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to 
> upgrade to ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already 
> 4.5.1). This could probably be the case in your environment as well that 
> caused those failures for you. I tested db upgrades today from ACS and CCP 
> 4.2 and 4.3 versions to ACS 4.5.1 on MySQL 5.5 and 5.6, and I think they work 
> out of the box with no changes needed.

Thanks for your investigations!

Since I could not reproduce it a second time, your analyses makes
totally sense and as you mentioned before and which I have overlooked
the tables were different, so in any case my error reporting can be
ignored and closed as a false postive. Can not wait to see 4.5.1 in
action! Thanks!

René

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Andrija Panic]

Hi Rohit,if this is by design, I think we really need to change it :) ASAP
Thx for confirmation

Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building
guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess
this is possibly on MGMT code side...?

On 7 May 2015 at 15:15, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi Andrija,
>
> > On 07-May-2015, at 3:08 pm, Andrija Panic 
> wrote:
> >
> > While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)…
>
> You and anyone in the community are welcome to vote and discuss issues.
>
> > ...  we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous
> > releases also (4.3.x):
> >
> > Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451
>
> The issue is by design and I imagine would haved existed in all 4.2+. But,
> since it does not introduce any regression or breaking feature/design I
> think we can try to address this as a design improvement in 4.5.2 or 4.6.0.
>
> Regards.
>
> > After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do "netstat" on
> > VM that is behind VPC, and you don't see real client remote IP, you see
> > Source NAT IP of the VPC VR !
> >
> > We isolated 1 problematic VR iptables rule - please check the issue...
> >
> > Lot of software behind VPC become uselsess, firewall,
> > fail2ban,SIP/Asterisk/web server logs etc.. - since all connections from
> > internet through VPC seems to come from VR...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On 7 May 2015 at 14:57, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 with the following testing
> >>
> >> Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2
> >> Hypervisors
> >> Manual Tests via UI included
> >>  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
> >>  Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR
> >>  Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR
> >>  VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc)
> >>  Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs
> >>  Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and
> >> confirming storage clean-up
> >>
> >> API Scripted tests included
> >>  Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and
> >> NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs
> >>
> >>
> >> Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and
> >> AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors.  Dual Zone,
> >> with multiple PODs and Clusters.
> >> Manual Tests included
> >>  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
> >>  Upgrade VRs as Root Admin
> >>  Updating Security Groups
> >>  Adding / Removing Static NAT
> >>  Adding / Removing Load Balancing
> >>  Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing
> >>  Adding / Removing AutoScaling
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Geoff Higginbottom
> >>
> >> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >>
> >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
> >> Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56
> >> To: CloudStack Dev
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> >>
> >> +1 with following testing:
> >>
> >> Manual Testing:
> >>
> >> Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
> >>  VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
> >>  VM Migration
> >>  Affinity groups - anti affinity
> >>  VM consoles
> >>  VM and volume snapshots
> >>  Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template
> >> created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot
> >>  Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper
> >> error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448
> >>  Resize volum, Download volume
> >>  Snapshot policies
> >>  Change password
> >>  2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs
> in
> >> the same tier, VPC ACL
> >>
> >> Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437
> >>
> >> None of the issues are a blocker.
> >>
> >> -abhi
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav 
> >> wrote:
> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

> On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic  wrote:
>
> Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building
> guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess
> this is possibly on MGMT code side...?

This is a very old wiki: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Build+Your+Own+SystemVM+Templates

Here is the code that builds systemvmtemplate: (see the README)
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/master/tools/appliance
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/4.5/tools/appliance

If you need to add any iptables rules to fix the issue, you may make changes to 
this file:
https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/blob/4.5/systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Andrija Panic]

THx Rohit.

On 7 May 2015 at 15:42, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template
> building
> > guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I
> guess
> > this is possibly on MGMT code side...?
>
> This is a very old wiki:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Build+Your+Own+SystemVM+Templates
>
> Here is the code that builds systemvmtemplate: (see the README)
> https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/master/tools/appliance
> https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/4.5/tools/appliance
>
> If you need to add any iptables rules to fix the issue, you may make
> changes to this file:
>
> https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/blob/4.5/systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi David,

You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put
4.5.1 here instead.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru


ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 19/03/2015 15:40, "David Nalley"  wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
>Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>location):
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>[ ] +1  approve
>[ ] +0  no opinion
>[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[David Nalley]

I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the
template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank
spots.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
 wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put
> 4.5.1 here instead.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
>  | M: +447968161581 
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
>  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> 
>
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> 
>
>
>
>
> On 19/03/2015 15:40, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>>/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
>>Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
>>
>>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>location):
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
>>
>>PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>>Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>>[ ] +1  approve
>>[ ] +0  no opinion
>>[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

(+ users)

Hi all,

I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for
your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/

4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/

(If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM templates).

Happy testing!

On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote:

I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the
template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank
spots.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
 wrote:

Hi David,

You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put
4.5.1 here instead.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru


ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 19/03/2015 15:40, "David Nalley"  wrote:


Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.


--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registe

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)

Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations
(after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
- Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served
1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I
realize ab is not really a good tool)
- Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing
- Register template and ISO
- VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
- Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
- Use of both NFS and local primary storage
- Download volume, iso, template
- VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
create/update/delete/apply etc

Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
- Volume migration (after stopped)
- Attach/detach volumes
- NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
- Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
- Register template/iso worked
- Download volume, iso, template
- Shared network with SG worked
- Password server tested, reset password

Minor issues:

- RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
Note: centos7 builds are fine.
- UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab.

On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Nux!]

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
> 
> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
> 
> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations
> (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
> - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served
> 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I
> realize ab is not really a good tool)
> - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing
> - Register template and ISO
> - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
> - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
> - Use of both NFS and local primary storage
> - Download volume, iso, template
> - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
> with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
> create/update/delete/apply etc
> 
> Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
> 
> - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
> - Volume migration (after stopped)
> - Attach/detach volumes
> - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
> - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
> - Register template/iso worked
> - Download volume, iso, template
> - Shared network with SG worked
> - Password server tested, reset password
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
> Note: centos7 builds are fine.
> - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab.
> 
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
>> Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
> those
> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in
> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in
> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by
> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Paul Angus]

-1
Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
Causes:
Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table 
for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject

When trying to deploy system VM templates.

Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to 
the db
Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
SSVM and CPVM do not get created

Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>
> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>
> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
> migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
> - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
> served
> 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
> I realize ab is not really a good tool)
> - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
> balancing
> - Register template and ISO
> - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
> - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
> - Use of both NFS and local primary storage
> - Download volume, iso, template
> - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
> with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
> create/update/delete/apply etc
>
> Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>
> - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
> - Volume migration (after stopped)
> - Attach/detach volumes
> - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
> - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
> - Register template/iso worked
> - Download volume, iso, template
> - Shared network with SG worked
> - Password server tested, reset password
>
> Minor issues:
>
> - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
> in
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
> 89bdd8c885b2a2
> Note: centos7 builds are fine.
> - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab.
>
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
>> =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
>> Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer
> below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range
> of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design &
> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi everyone,

Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: 
they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 
users.

In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and 
please continue testing:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2

> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>
> -1
> Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
> Causes:
> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table 
> for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>
> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>
> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to 
> the db
> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>
> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: 
> @CloudyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>
> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>
>> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>
>> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
>> migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
>> - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
>> served
>> 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
>> I realize ab is not really a good tool)
>> - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
>> balancing
>> - Register template and ISO
>> - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
>> - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
>> - Use of both NFS and local primary storage
>> - Download volume, iso, template
>> - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
>> with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
>> create/update/delete/apply etc
>>
>> Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>
>> - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
>> - Volume migration (after stopped)
>> - Attach/detach volumes
>> - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
>> - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
>> - Register template/iso worked
>> - Download volume, iso, template
>> - Shared network with SG worked
>> - Password server tested, reset password
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
>> in
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
>> 89bdd8c885b2a2
>> Note: centos7 builds are fine.
>> - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab.
>>
>> On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
>>> =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
>>> Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, Shap

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[ilya]

Rohit,

While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this 
warrants RC2 release.


David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?

Thanks
ilya

On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi everyone,

Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: 
they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 
users.

In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and 
please continue testing:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2


On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:

-1
Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
Causes:
Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table 
for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject

When trying to deploy system VM templates.

Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to 
the db
Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
SSVM and CPVM do not get created

Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)

Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
- Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
served
1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
I realize ab is not really a good tool)
- Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
balancing
- Register template and ISO
- VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
- Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
- Use of both NFS and local primary storage
- Download volume, iso, template
- VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
create/update/delete/apply etc

Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
- Volume migration (after stopped)
- Attach/detach volumes
- NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
- Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
- Register template/iso worked
- Download volume, iso, template
- Shared network with SG worked
- Password server tested, reset password

Minor issues:

- RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
89bdd8c885b2a2
Note: centos7 builds are fine.
- UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab.

On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer
below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range
of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attac

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[David Nalley]

Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
before I do so.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
> Rohit,
>
> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
> warrants RC2 release.
>
> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
>
> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
>> CentOS6 users.
>>
>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
>> and please continue testing:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>
>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>
>>> -1
>>> Regression caused by
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>> Causes:
>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>
>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>
>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
>>> to the db
>>> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>
>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Paul Angus
>>> Cloud Architect
>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>> @CloudyAngus
>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>
>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>
>>> Lucian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>>>
>>>> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>
>>>> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
>>>> migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
>>>> - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
>>>> served
>>>> 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
>>>> I realize ab is not really a good tool)
>>>> - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
>>>> balancing
>>>> - Register template and ISO
>>>> - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
>>>> - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
>>>> - Use of both NFS and local primary storage
>>>> - Download volume, iso, template
>>>> - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
>>>> with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
>>>> create/update/delete/apply etc
>>>>
>>>> Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>
>>>> - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
>>>> - Volume migration (after stopped)
>>>> - Attach/detach volumes
>>>> - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
>>>> - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
>>>> - Register template/iso worked
>>>> - Download volume, iso, template
>>>> - Shared network with SG worked
>>>> - Password server tested, reset password
>>>>
>>>> Minor issues:
>>>>
>>>> - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
>>>> in
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
>>>> 89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>> Note: centos7 builds are fine.
>>>> - UI logs out on refre

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Nux!]

I got nothing.

Go with rc2 as far as I'm concerned.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "David Nalley" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 01:51:02
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
> before I do so.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
>> Rohit,
>>
>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>> warrants RC2 release.
>>
>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>
>> Thanks
>> ilya
>>
>>
>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>
>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
>>> and please continue testing:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>
>>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> Regression caused by
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>> Causes:
>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
>>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>
>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>
>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
>>>> to the db
>>>> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>
>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Angus
>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>>> @CloudyAngus
>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>>
>>>> Lucian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>>
>>>>> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
>>>>> migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
>>>>> - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
>>>>> served
>>>>> 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
>>>>> I realize ab is not really a good tool)
>>>>> - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
>>>>> balancing
>>>>> - Register template and ISO
>>>>> - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
>>>>> - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
>>>>> - Use of both NFS and local primary storage
>>>>> - Download volume, iso, template
>>>>> - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
>>>>> with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
>>>>> create/update/delete/apply etc
>>>>>
>>>>> Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
>>>>> - Volume migra

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?

> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
> before I do so.
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
>> Rohit,
>>
>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>> warrants RC2 release.
>>
>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>
>> Thanks
>> ilya
>>
>>
>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>
>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
>>> and please continue testing:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>
>>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> Regression caused by
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>> Causes:
>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
>>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>
>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>
>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
>>>> to the db
>>>> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>
>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Angus
>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>>> @CloudyAngus
>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>>
>>>> Lucian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>>
>>>>> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
>>>>> migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
>>>>> - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
>>>>> served
>>>>> 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
>>>>> I realize ab is not really a good tool)
>>>>> - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
>>>>> balancing
>>>>> - Register template and ISO
>>>>> - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
>>>>> - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
>>>>> - Use of both NFS and local primary storage
>>>>> - Download volume, iso, template
>>>>> - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
>>>>> with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
>>>>> create/update/delete/apply etc
>>>>>
>>>>> Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>&

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Hello, 

Does anyone have an idea when the 4.5.1 is going to be out including the 
packaged versions? It has been a while since the unfortunate, but well spotted, 
release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes 
shortly. 

Cheers 

Andrei 
- Original Message -

> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

> (+ users)

> Hi all,

> I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC
> for
> your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/

> 4.5 systemvm templates:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/

> (If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM
> templates).

> Happy testing!

> On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the
> > template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank
> > spots.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
> >  wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant
> >> to put
> >> 4.5.1 here instead.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Geoff Higginbottom
> >> CTO / Cloud Architect
> >>
> >> D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> >>  | M: +447968161581 
> >>
> >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
> >>  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> >> <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
> >>
> >> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> >> 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19/03/2015 15:40, "David Nalley"  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for
> >>> a vote:
> >>>
> >>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
> >>> /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
> >>> Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
> >>>
> >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> >>> same
> >>> location):
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
> >>>
> >>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
> >>> to
> >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> >> services
> >>
> >> IaaS Cloud Design &
> >> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> >> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> >> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> >> CloudStack
> >> Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> >> CloudStack Software
> >> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> >> CloudStack Infrastructure
> >> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> >> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> >> addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of
> >> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue
> >> Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
> >> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its
> >> contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> >> sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
> >> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
> >> ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India
> >> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue
> >> Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Bra

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[ilya]

Andrei,

I'm certain you are aware of this, but if you really have to move 
forward with 4.5.1, why not build from source?


You can then upgrade once we are ready with 4.5.1

As of now, we are waiting to see if more issues will surface before 
calling RC2 vote.


I've been running ACS 4.5 in lab envs for some time and also tested 
upgrade path from 4.3 to 4.5.


Regards
ilya

On 3/24/15 5:28 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:

Hello,

Does anyone have an idea when the 4.5.1 is going to be out including the 
packaged versions? It has been a while since the unfortunate, but well spotted, 
release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes 
shortly.

Cheers

Andrei
- Original Message -


From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
(+ users)
Hi all,
I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC
for
your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
4.5 systemvm templates:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
(If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM
templates).
Happy testing!
On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote:

I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the
template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank
spots.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
 wrote:

Hi David,

You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant
to put
4.5.1 here instead.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 19/03/2015 15:40, "David Nalley"  wrote:


Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for
a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack
Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue
Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its
contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India
and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue
Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and
is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty
Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and
is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
registered trademark.

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services
IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Trai

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[ilya]

I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 
4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong).


I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to 
see any issue.




On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?


On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:

Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
before I do so.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:

Rohit,

While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
warrants RC2 release.

David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?

Thanks
ilya


On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi everyone,

Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
CentOS6 users.

In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
and please continue testing:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2


On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:

-1
Regression caused by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
Causes:
Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject

When trying to deploy system VM templates.

Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
to the db
Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
SSVM and CPVM do not get created

Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
@CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)

Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
- Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
served
1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
I realize ab is not really a good tool)
- Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
balancing
- Register template and ISO
- VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
- Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
- Use of both NFS and local primary storage
- Download volume, iso, template
- VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
create/update/delete/apply etc

Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
- Volume migration (after stopped)
- Attach/detach volumes
- NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
- Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
- Register template/iso worked
- Download volume, iso, template
- Shared network with SG worked
- Password server tested, reset password

Minor issues:

- RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
89bdd8c885b2a2
Note: centos7 builds are fine.
- UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another
tab.

On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  dis

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 
that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any 
Vmware specific changes.

> On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya  wrote:
>
> I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, 
> they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong).
>
> I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see 
> any issue.
>
>
>
> On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so 
>> let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.
>>
>> Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
>> think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
>> share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before 
>> we do RC2 if possible?
>>
>>> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>
>>> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
>>> before I do so.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
>>>> Rohit,
>>>>
>>>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>>>> warrants RC2 release.
>>>>
>>>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> ilya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>>>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
>>>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>>>
>>>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
>>>>> and please continue testing:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -1
>>>>>> Regression caused by
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>>>> Causes:
>>>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
>>>>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
>>>>>> to the db
>>>>>> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul Angus
>>>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>>>>> @CloudyAngus
>>>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>>>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nux!
>>>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>>>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>>>>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[ilya]

Rohit,

I will take this off the list and email you directly. We can then report 
back to Dev list once we are done testing..


Regards
ilya
On 3/24/15 10:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 
that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any 
Vmware specific changes.


On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya  wrote:

I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, 
they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong).

I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any 
issue.



On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?


On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:

Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
before I do so.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:

Rohit,

While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
warrants RC2 release.

David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?

Thanks
ilya


On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi everyone,

Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
CentOS6 users.

In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
and please continue testing:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2


On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:

-1
Regression caused by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
Causes:
Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject

When trying to deploy system VM templates.

Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
to the db
Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
SSVM and CPVM do not get created

Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
@CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)

Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
- Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
served
1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
I realize ab is not really a good tool)
- Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
balancing
- Register template and ISO
- VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
- Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
- Use of both NFS and local primary storage
- Download volume, iso, template
- VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
create/update/delete/apply etc

Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
- Volume migration (after stopped)
- Attach/detach volumes
- NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
- Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
- Register template/iso worked
- Download volume, iso, template
- Shared network with SG worked
- Password server tested, reset password

Minor issues:

- RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
89bdd8c885b2a2
Note: centos7 builds are fine.
- UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another
tab.

On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8

Source release (check

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load 
Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config 
using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.

It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use 
vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails

I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a 
common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also 
affect Advanced Zones.


A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally 
-1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to 
remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?

> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
> before I do so.
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
>> Rohit,
>>
>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>> warrants RC2 release.
>>
>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>
>> Thanks
>> ilya
>>
>>
>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect
>>> only
>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>
>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top
>>> of RC1 and please continue testing:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f
>>> 776c87eac334f185
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d
>>> 7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>
>>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> Regression caused by
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>> Causes:
>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in
>>>> ObjectInDataStore table for:
>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>
>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>
>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be
>>>> added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>
>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Angus
>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>>> @CloudyAngus
>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-----
>>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>>
>>>> Lucian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>>
>>>>> - VM

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[David Nalley]

awesome - thanks Geoff.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Geoff Higginbottom
 wrote:
> -1
>
> The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete 
> Load Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer 
> config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.
>
> It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use 
> vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails
>
> I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not 
> a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may 
> also affect Advanced Zones.
>
>
> A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally 
> -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to 
> remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the 
> API.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
> wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.
>
> Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
> think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
> share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
> do RC2 if possible?
>
>> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>
>> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
>> before I do so.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
>>> Rohit,
>>>
>>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>>> warrants RC2 release.
>>>
>>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> ilya
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect
>>>> only
>>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>>
>>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top
>>>> of RC1 and please continue testing:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f
>>>> 776c87eac334f185
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d
>>>> 7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>>
>>>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -1
>>>>> Regression caused by
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>>> Causes:
>>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in
>>>>> ObjectInDataStore table for:
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>>
>>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be
>>>>> added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>>
>>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Angus
>>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>>>> @CloudyAngus
>>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Geoff,

I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB
rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API
can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from
Chrome devtools:

command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
response:json
id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184

Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?

Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB
algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that
when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network
response instead of hard coding it.

It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined
it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've
added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the
passed arg is undefined:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178

Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?

On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:

-1

The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load 
Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config 
using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.

It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use 
vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails

I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a 
common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also 
affect Advanced Zones.


A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally 
-1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to 
remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?


On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:

Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
before I do so.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:

Rohit,

While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
warrants RC2 release.

David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?

Thanks
ilya


On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:


Hi everyone,

Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect
only
CentOS6 users.

In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top
of RC1 and please continue testing:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f
776c87eac334f185

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d
7f89bdd8c885b2a2


On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:

-1
Regression caused by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
Causes:
Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in
ObjectInDataStore table for:
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject

When trying to deploy system VM templates.

Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be
added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
SSVM and CPVM do not get created

Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
@CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -


From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)

Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- VM lifecycle with and witho

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Rohit,

Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, 
the end result is it fails

commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
responsejson
sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74

If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails

cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 
vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 
vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74
Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed

However if I then run

(geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 
virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95

It succeeds!

accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
cmd = 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBalancerRuleCmd
created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
jobprocstatus = 0
jobresult:
success = True
jobresultcode = 0
jobresulttype = object
jobstatus = 1
userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0

I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC

Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same 
thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the 
following:

TypeError: args.context is undefined
var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);

So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules 
and the UI

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi Geoff,

I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in 
an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list 
of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools:

command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
response:json
id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184

Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?

Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB 
algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when 
Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response 
instead of hard coding it.

It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would 
fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround 
to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178

Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?

On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> -1
>
> The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete 
> Load Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer 
> config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.
>
> It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying
> to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails
>
> I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not 
> a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may 
> also affect Advanced Zones.
>
>
> A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally 
> -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to 
> remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the 
> API.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
> wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.
>
> Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
> think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
> share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
> do RC2 if possible?
>
>> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>
>> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
>> before I do so.
&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi all,

The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an 
existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now).

> On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a 
> LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails
>
> commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
> id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> responsejson
> sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
> vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74
>
> If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails
>
> cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 
> vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 
> vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74
> Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed
>
> However if I then run
>
> (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule 
> id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 
> virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
>
> It succeeds!
>
> accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
> cmd = 
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBalancerRuleCmd
> created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
> jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
> jobprocstatus = 0
> jobresult:
> success = True
> jobresultcode = 0
> jobresulttype = object
> jobstatus = 1
> userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0
>
> I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC
>
> Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact 
> same thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug 
> reports the following:
>
> TypeError: args.context is undefined
> var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);
>
> So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer 
> Rules and the UI
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules 
> in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both 
> list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools:
>
> command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
> response:json
> id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
> vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
> vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184
>
> Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?
>
> Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB 
> algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when 
> Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response 
> instead of hard coding it.
>
> It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
> The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it 
> would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a 
> workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg 
> is undefined:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178
>
> Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?
>
> On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete 
>> Load Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer 
>> config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.
>>
>> It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying
>> to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails
>>
>> I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is 
>> not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug 
>> may also affect Advanced Zones.
>>
>>
>> A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not 
>> normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when 
>> trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI 
>> and the API.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Good work Rohit

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi all,

The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an 
existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now).

> On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a
> LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails
>
> commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
> id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> responsejson
> sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
> vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74
>
> If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails
>
> cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job
> 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed
>
> However if I then run
>
> (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule
> id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
>
> It succeeds!
>
> accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
> cmd =
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala
> ncerRuleCmd
> created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
> jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
> jobprocstatus = 0
> jobresult:
> success = True
> jobresultcode = 0
> jobresulttype = object
> jobstatus = 1
> userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0
>
> I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC
>
> Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact 
> same thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug 
> reports the following:
>
> TypeError: args.context is undefined
> var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);
>
> So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to
> LoadBalancer Rules and the UI
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules 
> in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both 
> list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools:
>
> command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
> response:json
> id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
> vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
> vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184
>
> Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?
>
> Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB 
> algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when 
> Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response 
> instead of hard coding it.
>
> It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
> The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it 
> would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a 
> workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg 
> is undefined:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;
> h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178
>
> Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?
>
> On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete 
>> Load Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer 
>> config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.
>>
>> It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is
>> trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails
>>
>> I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is 
>> not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug 
>> may also affect Advanced Zones.
>>
>>
>> A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not 
>> normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when 
>> trying to 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Rohit, by any chance , does this fix this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8231 ?

Thanks!



On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Good work Rohit
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi all,
>
> The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an
> existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now).
>
> > On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rohit,
> >
> > Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a
> > LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails
> >
> > commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
> > id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> > responsejson
> > sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
> > vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> > vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74
> >
> > If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails
> >
> > cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> > vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> > vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job
> > 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed
> >
> > However if I then run
> >
> > (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule
> > id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> > virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> >
> > It succeeds!
> >
> > accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
> > cmd =
> > org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala
> > ncerRuleCmd
> > created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
> > jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
> > jobprocstatus = 0
> > jobresult:
> > success = True
> > jobresultcode = 0
> > jobresulttype = object
> > jobstatus = 1
> > userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0
> >
> > I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC
> >
> > Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the
> exact same thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and
> Firebug reports the following:
> >
> > TypeError: args.context is undefined
> > var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);
> >
> > So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to
> > LoadBalancer Rules and the UI
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
> >
> > Hi Geoff,
> >
> > I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB
> rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can
> take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome
> devtools:
> >
> > command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
> > response:json
> > id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
> > vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
> > vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184
> >
> > Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?
> >
> > Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB
> algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when
> Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response
> instead of hard coding it.
> >
> > It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
> > The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined
> it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a
> workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg
> is undefined:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;
> > h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178
> >
> > Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?
> >
> > On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> >> -1
> >>
> >> The m

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Pierre,

I’ve added an extra check to fallback and use hardcoded list of algorithms if 
the list/context in unavailable.

> On 27-Mar-2015, at 12:33 am, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>
> Rohit, by any chance , does this fix this one:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8231 ?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>> Good work Rohit
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an
>> existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now).
>>
>>> On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom <
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>
>>> Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a
>>> LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails
>>>
>>> commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
>>> id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
>>> responsejson
>>> sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
>>> vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
>>> vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74
>>>
>>> If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails
>>>
>>> cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
>>> vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
>>> vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job
>>> 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed
>>>
>>> However if I then run
>>>
>>> (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule
>>> id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
>>> virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
>>>
>>> It succeeds!
>>>
>>> accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
>>> cmd =
>>> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala
>>> ncerRuleCmd
>>> created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
>>> jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
>>> jobprocstatus = 0
>>> jobresult:
>>> success = True
>>> jobresultcode = 0
>>> jobresulttype = object
>>> jobstatus = 1
>>> userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0
>>>
>>> I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC
>>>
>>> Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the
>> exact same thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and
>> Firebug reports the following:
>>>
>>> TypeError: args.context is undefined
>>> var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);
>>>
>>> So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to
>>> LoadBalancer Rules and the UI
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>>> Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>
>>> Hi Geoff,
>>>
>>> I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB
>> rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can
>> take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome
>> devtools:
>>>
>>> command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
>>> response:json
>>> id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
>>> vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
>>> vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184
>>>
>>> Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?
>>>
>>> Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB
>> algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when
>> Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response
>> instead of hard coding it.
>>>
>>> It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
>>> The issue was in case

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[ilya]

+1 binding on future ACS 4.5.1 RC2

To report back, I've tested ACS 4.5.1 on limited scale with vmware.

No issues observed so far, test cases covered:

vm created
disk attached
snapshots work
deletion works
console works
etc..




On 3/24/15 10:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 
that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any 
Vmware specific changes.


On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya  wrote:

I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, 
they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong).

I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any 
issue.



On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?


On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:

Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
before I do so.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:

Rohit,

While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
warrants RC2 release.

David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?

Thanks
ilya


On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

Hi everyone,

Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only
CentOS6 users.

In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1
and please continue testing:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2


On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:

-1
Regression caused by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
Causes:
Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject

When trying to deploy system VM templates.

Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
to the db
Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
SSVM and CPVM do not get created

Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
@CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.

Thanks Rohit for the packages.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)

Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
- Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server,
served
1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though
I realize ab is not really a good tool)
- Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load
balancing
- Register template and ISO
- VM statistics, dashboard capacity values
- Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours
- Use of both NFS and local primary storage
- Download volume, iso, template
- VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle
with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules
create/update/delete/apply etc

Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:

- Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle
- Volume migration (after stopped)
- Attach/detach volumes
- NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary
- Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen
- Register template/iso worked
- Download volume, iso, template
- Shared network with SG worked
- Password server tested, reset password

Minor issues:

- RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip
in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f
89bdd8c885b2a2
Note: centos7 builds are fine.
- UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another
tab.

On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Are we going to do a new RC soon?

Le vendredi 27 mars 2015, ilya  a écrit :

> +1 binding on future ACS 4.5.1 RC2
>
> To report back, I've tested ACS 4.5.1 on limited scale with vmware.
>
> No issues observed so far, test cases covered:
>
> vm created
> disk attached
> snapshots work
> deletion works
> console works
> etc..
>
>
>
>
> On 3/24/15 10:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after
>> 4.5.0 that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I
>> don’t see any Vmware specific changes.
>>
>>  On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya  wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post
>>> 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong).
>>>
>>> I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to
>>> see any issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so
>>>> let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we
>>>> find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if
>>>> someone could share their test results against VMWare and report
>>>> success/failures before we do RC2 if possible?
>>>>
>>>>  On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
>>>>> before I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rohit,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>>>>>> warrants RC2 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> ilya
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are
>>>>>>> fixed.
>>>>>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect
>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top
>>>>>>> of RC1
>>>>>>> and please continue testing:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/
>>>>>>> 53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/
>>>>>>> d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>> Regression caused by
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>>>>>> Causes:
>>>>>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in
>>>>>>>> ObjectInDataStore
>>>>>>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be
>>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>>> to the db
>>>>>>>> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>>>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paul Angus
>>>>>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>>>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi all,

I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing

SystemVM templates:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5

I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was
not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8372

You'll only hit this issue if you:
1. try to upload/setup a SSL certificate for use with CPVM
2. enable and use the experimental SAML2 auth plugin (since it creates
and stores x509 certificates in keystore table)

So, please test either using the above fix if testing the above features.

Applying this fix, I tested ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and following works:

- basic zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, local storage,
snapshots and SG rules with KVM
- advanced zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, snapshots,
local storage, vpc, firewall/port forwarding rules with KVM

In addition, ran a load test of deploying 200 VMs across 10
accounts/domains with small local storage offering (1GB RAM, 1core, 10GB
local disk) on 30 xen hosts across two pods and it went fine with no errors.

Note: the repo I shared does not have the above mentioned bugfix.

On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28 PM, David Nalley wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Awesome, will test shortly.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 10:26:37
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Hi all,
> 
> I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing
> 
> SystemVM templates:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5
> 
> I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was
> not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8372
> 
> You'll only hit this issue if you:
> 1. try to upload/setup a SSL certificate for use with CPVM
> 2. enable and use the experimental SAML2 auth plugin (since it creates
> and stores x509 certificates in keystore table)
> 
> So, please test either using the above fix if testing the above features.
> 
> Applying this fix, I tested ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and following works:
> 
> - basic zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, local storage,
> snapshots and SG rules with KVM
> - advanced zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, snapshots,
> local storage, vpc, firewall/port forwarding rules with KVM
> 
> In addition, ran a load test of deploying 200 VMs across 10
> accounts/domains with small local storage offering (1GB RAM, 1core, 10GB
> local disk) on 30 xen hosts across two pods and it went fine with no errors.
> 
> Note: the repo I shared does not have the above mentioned bugfix.
> 
> On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
> those
> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in
> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in
> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by
> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Mike Tutkowski]

I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
actually works):

Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format,
or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
field in api cmd class.

Is anyone else able to reproduce this?

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

-1

After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage 
pool registered 2 times.

Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the 
same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
> actually works):
> 
> Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
> Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format,
> or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
> field in api cmd class.
> 
> Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Thanks a lot, Rohit, let's hope it'll be an easy one.

What I've noticed happening is as you create instances, they will be spread 
among the 2 "duplicate" pools.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 16:51:34
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Hi Lucian,
> 
> Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow 
> and
> see if I can reproduce (and possibly fix) the issue.
> The repository I created and shared has exactly these two extra patches on top
> of 4.5.1 RC2:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6c5cf04d6242cd23cc1e7ea982529df9f27fcb1c
> (blocker)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1ef585f9e65e0854984211f11d5c2c7c2977a957
> (ui fix)
> 
> Regards.
> 
>> On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>
>> Ok,
>>
>> I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then
>> installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then
>> upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages.
>>
>> I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above.
>> Agent.properties looks like this:
>> #Storage
>> #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015
>> guest.network.device=br0
>> workers=5
>> private.network.device=br0
>> port=8250
>> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
>> pod=1
>> zone=1
>> hypervisor.type=kvm
>> guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898
>> public.network.device=br0
>> cluster=1
>> local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02
>> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
>> LibvirtComputingResource.id=1
>> host=10.10.175.227
>>
>>
>> Management & agent logs from the moment I started the services with the 
>> upgraded
>> version:
>> http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log
>> http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Nux!" 
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>>> Rohit,
>>>
>>> This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV.
>>>
>>> I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) 
>>> and
>>> try to upgrade to 4.5.1.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>>
>>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>>
>>>> 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a 
>>>> basic
>>>> zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can 
>>>> try
>>>> to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. 
>>>> Please
>>>> advise.
>>>>
>>>> I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname
>>>> instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af
>>>>
>>>> With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating 
>>>> one
>>>> using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to 
>>>> add
>>>> two different hosts with same hostname.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Rohit,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades
>>>>> resulted in duplicated local storage pools.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll test some more today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test 
>>>>> your
>>>>> packages at this point since it's essentially different cod

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Marcus]

Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the
agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or
removed/installed?

Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as
bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions.
In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just
because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there
are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release,
that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a
dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix
releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process.
On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, "Nux!"  wrote:

> -1
>
> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local
> storage pool registered 2 times.
>
> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same
> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
> > I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
> > actually works):
> >
> > Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
> > Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value
> format,
> > or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
> > field in api cmd class.
> >
> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> >> up for a vote:
> >>
> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
> >> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
> >>
> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >> location):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
> >>
> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Mike Tutkowski]

Thanks, Pierre-Luc

On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:

> Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364
>
>
>
> *Pierre-Luc DION*
> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> t 855.652.5683
>
> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure -
> on April 17th
> *Register now >>
> <https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442>*
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Nux!  > wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local
>> storage pool registered 2 times.
>>
>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same
>> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" > >
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>> > I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the
>> delete
>> > actually works):
>> >
>> > Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>> > Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value
>> format,
>> > or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for
>> the
>> > field in api cmd class.
>> >
>> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> >> up for a vote:
>> >>
>> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>> >> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>> >>
>> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> >> location):
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>> >>
>> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> 
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>>
>
>

-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Marcus,

I can't check if the guid has changed, but the upgrade was a normal one done 
using "yum update" from Rohit's el6 repo.

To make things more confusing, 2 upgrades ended up with duplicated local 
storage, but my last test has not.
I'll do a couple more tests today to see if the issue is consistent. I'll keep 
an eye on the guids.

+1 what you said re bugfix releases.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Marcus" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 05:56:55
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the
> agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or
> removed/installed?
> 
> Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as
> bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions.
> In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just
> because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there
> are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release,
> that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a
> dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix
> releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process.
> On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, "Nux!"  wrote:
> 
>> -1
>>
>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local
>> storage pool registered 2 times.
>>
>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same
>> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>> > I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
>> > actually works):
>> >
>> > Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>> > Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value
>> format,
>> > or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
>> > field in api cmd class.
>> >
>> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> >> up for a vote:
>> >>
>> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>> >> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>> >>
>> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> >> location):
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>> >>
>> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364



*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683

*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure - on
April 17th
*Register now >>
<https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442>*

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Nux!  wrote:

> -1
>
> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local
> storage pool registered 2 times.
>
> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same
> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
> > I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
> > actually works):
> >
> > Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
> > Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value
> format,
> > or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
> > field in api cmd class.
> >
> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> >> up for a vote:
> >>
> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
> >> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
> >>
> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >> location):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
> >>
> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Ok,

I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then 
installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then 
upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages.

I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above.
Agent.properties looks like this:
#Storage
#Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015
guest.network.device=br0
workers=5
private.network.device=br0
port=8250
resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
pod=1
zone=1
hypervisor.type=kvm
guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898
public.network.device=br0
cluster=1
local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02
domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
LibvirtComputingResource.id=1
host=10.10.175.227


Management & agent logs from the moment I started the services with the 
upgraded version:
http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log
http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log


Any ideas?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Rohit,
> 
> This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV.
> 
> I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) 
> and
> try to upgrade to 4.5.1.
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> 
>> Hi Lucian,
>> 
>> 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic
>> zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try
>> to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please
>> advise.
>> 
>> I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname
>> instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af
>> 
>> With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one
>> using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add
>> two different hosts with same hostname.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Rohit,
>>>
>>> This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades
>>> resulted in duplicated local storage pools.
>>>
>>> I'll test some more today.
>>>
>>> Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test 
>>> your
>>> packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David
>>> cut ...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>>
>>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>>
>>>> Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply 
>>>> reproduce the
>>>> issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues.
>>>>
>>>> I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2:
>>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>>>>
>>>> In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we 
>>>> continue
>>>> testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have 
>>>> a
>>>> next RC3 voting thread.
>>>>
>>>>> On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local 
>>>>> storage
>>>>> pool registered 2 times.
>>>>>
>>>>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same 
>>>>> server, the
>>>>> same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nux!
>>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Lucian,

Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow 
and see if I can reproduce (and possibly fix) the issue.
The repository I created and shared has exactly these two extra patches on top 
of 4.5.1 RC2:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6c5cf04d6242cd23cc1e7ea982529df9f27fcb1c
 (blocker)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1ef585f9e65e0854984211f11d5c2c7c2977a957
 (ui fix)

Regards.

> On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then 
> installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then 
> upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages.
>
> I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above.
> Agent.properties looks like this:
> #Storage
> #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015
> guest.network.device=br0
> workers=5
> private.network.device=br0
> port=8250
> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
> pod=1
> zone=1
> hypervisor.type=kvm
> guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898
> public.network.device=br0
> cluster=1
> local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02
> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
> LibvirtComputingResource.id=1
> host=10.10.175.227
>
>
> Management & agent logs from the moment I started the services with the 
> upgraded version:
> http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log
> http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Nux!" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
>> Rohit,
>>
>> This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV.
>>
>> I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) 
>> and
>> try to upgrade to 4.5.1.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>
>>> 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a 
>>> basic
>>> zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can 
>>> try
>>> to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please
>>> advise.
>>>
>>> I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname
>>> instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression:
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af
>>>
>>> With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating 
>>> one
>>> using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to 
>>> add
>>> two different hosts with same hostname.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Rohit,
>>>>
>>>> This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades
>>>> resulted in duplicated local storage pools.
>>>>
>>>> I'll test some more today.
>>>>
>>>> Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test 
>>>> your
>>>> packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what 
>>>> David
>>>> cut ...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply 
>>>>> reproduce the
>>>>> issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2:
>>>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Rohit,

This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV.

I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and 
try to upgrade to 4.5.1.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Hi Lucian,
> 
> 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic
> zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try
> to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please
> advise.
> 
> I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname
> instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af
> 
> With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one
> using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add
> two different hosts with same hostname.
> 
> 
>> On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Rohit,
>>
>> This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades
>> resulted in duplicated local storage pools.
>>
>> I'll test some more today.
>>
>> Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test 
>> your
>> packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David
>> cut ...
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>
>>> Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply 
>>> reproduce the
>>> issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues.
>>>
>>> I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2:
>>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>>>
>>> In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue
>>> testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a
>>> next RC3 voting thread.
>>>
>>>> On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local 
>>>> storage
>>>> pool registered 2 times.
>>>>
>>>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same 
>>>> server, the
>>>> same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>>>
>>>>> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
>>>>> actually works):
>>>>>
>>>>> Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>>>>> Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value 
>>>>> format,
>>>>> or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
>>>>> field in api cmd class.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>>>>> up for a vote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>>>>>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Lucian,

Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce 
the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues.

I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/

In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue 
testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a 
next RC3 voting thread.

> On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>
> -1
>
> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local 
> storage pool registered 2 times.
>
> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, 
> the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
>> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
>> actually works):
>>
>> Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>> Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format,
>> or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
>> field in api cmd class.
>>
>> Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>> up for a vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Lucian,

2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic 
zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try 
to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please 
advise.

I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname 
instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af

With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one 
using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add 
two different hosts with same hostname.


> On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>
> Thanks Rohit,
>
> This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades 
> resulted in duplicated local storage pools.
>
> I'll test some more today.
>
> Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test 
> your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what 
> David cut ...
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
>> Hi Lucian,
>>
>> Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce 
>> the
>> issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues.
>>
>> I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>>
>> In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue
>> testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a
>> next RC3 voting thread.
>>
>>> On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local 
>>> storage
>>> pool registered 2 times.
>>>
>>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, 
>>> the
>>> same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>>
>>>> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
>>>> actually works):
>>>>
>>>> Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>>>> Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format,
>>>> or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
>>>> field in api cmd class.
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>>>> up for a vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>>>>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>>>>>
>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>>> location):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> e: mike.tutkow.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Thanks Rohit,

This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades 
resulted in duplicated local storage pools.

I'll test some more today.

Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your 
packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David 
cut ...

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Hi Lucian,
> 
> Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce 
> the
> issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues.
> 
> I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
> 
> In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue
> testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a
> next RC3 voting thread.
> 
>> On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local 
>> storage
>> pool registered 2 times.
>>
>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, 
>> the
>> same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" 
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>>> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
>>> actually works):
>>>
>>> Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>>> Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format,
>>> or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
>>> field in api cmd class.
>>>
>>> Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>>>> up for a vote:
>>>>
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>>>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>>>>
>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>> location):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>>>>
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> 
> 
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
> those
> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in
> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in
> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by
> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

[Nux!]

Hi

I've tried again with my own RPMS this time and with the Jenkins systemvm 
template, but still no go.
It seems like I will get randomly the local primary storage shown twice ... 

Rohit, have you had any luck with those logs?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 18:32:22
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Rohit,
> 
> Here's the table you requested:
> 
> http://fpaste.org/209313/53496142/raw/
> 
> And the old management logs - be advised they're ~3MB and may contain several
> upgrade procedures as I have not deleted the logs in between some of my tests:
> http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-old-management-server.log
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 17:45:50
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> 
>> Hi Lucian,
>> 
>> I’m still very much interested in your cloud.storage_pool table which should
>> have two entries. Can you dig them up and share them (perhaps privately if 
>> it’s
>> an issue for you) with me along with pre-upgrade logs? I’ll try again 
>> tomorrow,
>> along with few other issues that I’ve identified.
>> 
>> A recent change I’ve done is to use latest open-vm-tools from 
>> wheezy-backports
>> (for vmware) and install xstools-6.5 on 4.5+ systemvms which should improve
>> systemvm performance on xen and vmware hosts.
>> 
>>> On 10-Apr-2015, at 9:58 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>
>>> Rohit,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your effort to test. This problem does not seem to affect VM
>>> lifecycle.
>>> I will repeat my tests on fresh installations, but I will have to postpone 
>>> this
>>> until next week, with the Easter coming and all.
>>>
>>> Lucian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 08:59:39
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>>
>>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>>
>>>> I’ve tried to setup a similar environment and tried upgrading 4.4.1 
>>>> (KVM+local
>>>> storage) to 4.5.1 and I could not reproduce it even after two clean 
>>>> attempts. I
>>>> read through the logs and the only local storage path I found was:
>>>> 5da7e725-d33a-43f8-afc7-d0ee0741bdb3 (1707.cloud.priv).
>>>>
>>>> The logs you shared are only include things after the upgrade. Can you 
>>>> grep the
>>>> logs before you did the upgrade searching for “/var/lib/libvirt/images” or 
>>>> any
>>>> local storage related to hostname 1707.cloud.priv. Also, can you share the 
>>>> db
>>>> results of: select * from cloud.storage_pool;
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, even if you see two local storage pools - does it cause failure of 
>>>> any
>>>> normal vm lifecycle operations?
>>>>
>>>>> On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok,
>>>>>
>>>>> I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack 
>>>>> then
>>>>> installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then
>>>>> upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages.
>>>>>
>>>>> I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above.
>>>>> Agent.properties looks like this:
>>>>> #Storage
>>>>> #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015
>>>>> guest.network.device=br0
>>>>> workers=5
>>>>> private.network.device=br0
>>>>> port=8250
>>>>> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
>>>>> pod=1
>>>>> zone=1
>>>>> hypervisor.type=kvm
>>>>> guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898
>>>>> public.network.device=br0
>>>>> cluster=1
>>>>> local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02
>>>>> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
>&g

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Nux!]

Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: "dev" 
> Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 14:27:20
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

> Hi all,
> 
> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with
> Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes.
> 
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> 5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan)
> 
> +1 (non binding)
> 3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi)
> 
> 0
> none
> 
> -1
> none
> 
> Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one :)
> 
> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give 
> the
> mirrors time to catch up.
> 
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/fosggwzoyjuchvfq
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> 
> 
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
> those
> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in
> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in
> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by
> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Thanks to everyone who tested and voted. Just realised I forgot to remove the 
“Z" from the template, it should have read:

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 *passes* with 5 PMC and 3 non-PMC 
votes.

> On 08-May-2015, at 12:17 am, Nux!  wrote:
>
> Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :)
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>> To: "dev" 
>> Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 14:27:20
>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with
>> Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes.
>>
>> +1 (PMC / binding)
>> 5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan)
>>
>> +1 (non binding)
>> 3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi)
>>
>> 0
>> none
>>
>> -1
>> none
>>
>> Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one :)
>>
>> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give 
>> the
>> mirrors time to catch up.
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/fosggwzoyjuchvfq
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>
>>
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>> CloudStack Software
>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure
>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely
>> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
>> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
>> those
>> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient
>> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
>> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in
>> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in
>> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
>> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by
>> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
>> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Daan Hoogland]

k, how are you on the announce? you asked for help but I didn't see a draft.

Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 00:29 schreef Rohit Yadav :

> Thanks to everyone who tested and voted. Just realised I forgot to remove
> the “Z" from the template, it should have read:
>
> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 *passes* with 5 PMC and 3
> non-PMC votes.
>
> > On 08-May-2015, at 12:17 am, Nux!  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :)
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> >> To: "dev" 
> >> Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 14:27:20
> >> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with
> >> Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes.
> >>
> >> +1 (PMC / binding)
> >> 5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan)
> >>
> >> +1 (non binding)
> >> 3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi)
> >>
> >> 0
> >> none
> >>
> >> -1
> >> none
> >>
> >> Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one :)
> >>
> >> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to
> give the
> >> mirrors time to catch up.
> >>
> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/fosggwzoyjuchvfq
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Rohit Yadav
> >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> >> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >>
> >> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> >> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
> >
> >> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> >> CloudStack Software
> >> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> >> CloudStack Infrastructure
> >> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >>
> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely
> >> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions
> >> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those
> >> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> >> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its
> contents, nor
> >> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
> have
> >> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in
> >> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated
> in
> >> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue
> Brasil
> >> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated
> under
> >> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
> registered by
> >> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd.
> >> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

I was waiting on some quotes, will share the draft with placeholders for quotes 
tomorrow.

> On 08-May-2015, at 12:42 am, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
> k, how are you on the announce? you asked for help but I didn't see a draft.
>
> Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 00:29 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>> Thanks to everyone who tested and voted. Just realised I forgot to remove
>> the “Z" from the template, it should have read:
>>
>> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 *passes* with 5 PMC and 3
>> non-PMC votes.
>>
>>> On 08-May-2015, at 12:17 am, Nux!  wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -
>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>> To: "dev" 
>>>> Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 14:27:20
>>>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with
>>>> Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes.
>>>>
>>>> +1 (PMC / binding)
>>>> 5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan)
>>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>> 3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi)
>>>>
>>>> 0
>>>> none
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> none
>>>>
>>>> Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one :)
>>>>
>>>> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to
>> give the
>>>> mirrors time to catch up.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/fosggwzoyjuchvfq
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rohit Yadav
>>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>> services
>>>>
>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
>>>
>>>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>>>> CloudStack Software
>>>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure
>>>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>>>
>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> intended solely
>>>> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions
>>>> expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those
>>>> of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended
>> recipient
>>>> of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its
>> contents, nor
>>>> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
>> have
>>>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
>> in
>>>> England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated
>> in
>>>> India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue
>> Brasil
>>>> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated
>> under
>>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
>> registered by
>>>> The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape
>> Blue Ltd.
>>>> ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>
>>
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>> CloudStack Software Enginee

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[ilya]

Dont know if its possible,

But somewhere in the release notes we need to state something along the 
lines of. Can anyone please help?


"If you are experiencing CloudStack UI issues, please consider upgrading 
your tomcat instance to version 6.0.43  (tested version, but earlier 
versions prior to 6.0.37 might work as well), to address the tomcat 
response issues caused by latency between the browser/client and 
CloudStack Management server."


I've just run a test upgrade from 4.3 to 4.5.1, while everything worked 
fine, i would see jobs failed in UI, while nothing would show up in the 
management server log file. Upgrading the tomcat to 6.0.43 resolved this 
issue as i have considerable latency between my client and server.


Regards
ilya

On 5/7/15 4:12 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:

I was waiting on some quotes, will share the draft with placeholders for quotes 
tomorrow.


On 08-May-2015, at 12:42 am, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

k, how are you on the announce? you asked for help but I didn't see a draft.

Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 00:29 schreef Rohit Yadav :


Thanks to everyone who tested and voted. Just realised I forgot to remove
the “Z" from the template, it should have read:

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 *passes* with 5 PMC and 3
non-PMC votes.


On 08-May-2015, at 12:17 am, Nux!  wrote:

Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Rohit Yadav" 
To: "dev" 
Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 14:27:20
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1
Hi all,

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with
Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan)

+1 (non binding)
3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi)

0
none

-1
none

Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one :)

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to

give the

mirrors time to catch up.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/fosggwzoyjuchvfq

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related

services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<

http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>

CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<

http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are

intended solely

for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or

opinions

expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily

represent those

of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended

recipient

of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its

contents, nor

copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you

have

received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated

in

England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated

in

India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue

Brasil

Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated

under

license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company

registered by

The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape

Blue Ltd.

ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software Engineering<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contac

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Done.

> On 09-May-2015, at 3:35 am, ilya  wrote:
>
> If you are experiencing CloudStack UI issues, please consider upgrading your 
> tomcat instance to version 6.0.43  (tested version, but earlier versions 
> prior to 6.0.37 might work as well), to address the tomcat response issues 
> caused by latency between the browser/client and CloudStack Management server.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Erik Weber]

The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.

I could've done it if I only knew how :-)

-- 
Erik

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

> Done.
>
> > On 09-May-2015, at 3:35 am, ilya  wrote:
> >
> > If you are experiencing CloudStack UI issues, please consider upgrading
> your tomcat instance to version 6.0.43  (tested version, but earlier
> versions prior to 6.0.37 might work as well), to address the tomcat
> response issues caused by latency between the browser/client and CloudStack
> Management server.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Erik,

> On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber  wrote:
>
> The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
> well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
>
> I could've done it if I only knew how :-)

I’m not sure how to do it as well. I’ve posted announcements on various MLs 
though.
I tried to get a press release out on marketing ML, but I think since it was a 
minor release it did not get any attention.

Anyone know how to publish on the blog? Thanks.

>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
>
>> Done.
>>
>>> On 09-May-2015, at 3:35 am, ilya  wrote:
>>>
>>> If you are experiencing CloudStack UI issues, please consider upgrading
>> your tomcat instance to version 6.0.43  (tested version, but earlier
>> versions prior to 6.0.37 might work as well), to address the tomcat
>> response issues caused by latency between the browser/client and CloudStack
>> Management server.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>
>>
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.