Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 with following testing: Manual Testing: Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5 VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM VM Migration Affinity groups - anti affinity VM consoles VM and volume snapshots Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448 Resize volum, Download volume Snapshot policies Change password 2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the same tier, VPC ACL Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437 None of the issues are a blocker. -abhi On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM). When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option. I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v. Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid. On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Rene, The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 cloud database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to upgrade to ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already 4.5.1). This could probably be the case in your environment as well that caused those failures for you. I tested db upgrades today from ACS and CCP 4.2 and 4.3 versions to ACS 4.5.1 on MySQL 5.5 and 5.6, and I think they work out of the box with no changes needed. On 05-May-2015, at 1:01 pm, Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net wrote: Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 with the following testing Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 Hypervisors Manual Tests via UI included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc) Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and confirming storage clean-up API Scripted tests included Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors. Dual Zone, with multiple PODs and Clusters. Manual Tests included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Upgrade VRs as Root Admin Updating Security Groups Adding / Removing Static NAT Adding / Removing Load Balancing Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing Adding / Removing AutoScaling Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 with following testing: Manual Testing: Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5 VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM VM Migration Affinity groups - anti affinity VM consoles VM and volume snapshots Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448 Resize volum, Download volume Snapshot policies Change password 2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the same tier, VPC ACL Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437 None of the issues are a blocker. -abhi On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM). When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option. I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v. Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid. On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Rohit,if this is by design, I think we really need to change it :) ASAP Thx for confirmation Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess this is possibly on MGMT code side...? On 7 May 2015 at 15:15, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Andrija, On 07-May-2015, at 3:08 pm, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)… You and anyone in the community are welcome to vote and discuss issues. ... we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous releases also (4.3.x): Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451 The issue is by design and I imagine would haved existed in all 4.2+. But, since it does not introduce any regression or breaking feature/design I think we can try to address this as a design improvement in 4.5.2 or 4.6.0. Regards. After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do netstat on VM that is behind VPC, and you don't see real client remote IP, you see Source NAT IP of the VPC VR ! We isolated 1 problematic VR iptables rule - please check the issue... Lot of software behind VPC become uselsess, firewall, fail2ban,SIP/Asterisk/web server logs etc.. - since all connections from internet through VPC seems to come from VR... Thanks On 7 May 2015 at 14:57, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 with the following testing Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 Hypervisors Manual Tests via UI included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc) Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and confirming storage clean-up API Scripted tests included Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors. Dual Zone, with multiple PODs and Clusters. Manual Tests included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Upgrade VRs as Root Admin Updating Security Groups Adding / Removing Static NAT Adding / Removing Load Balancing Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing Adding / Removing AutoScaling Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 with following testing: Manual Testing: Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5 VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM VM Migration Affinity groups - anti affinity VM consoles VM and volume snapshots Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448 Resize volum, Download volume Snapshot policies Change password 2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the same tier, VPC ACL Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437 None of the issues are a blocker. -abhi On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM). When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option. I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi, On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess this is possibly on MGMT code side...? This is a very old wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Build+Your+Own+SystemVM+Templates Here is the code that builds systemvmtemplate: (see the README) https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/master/tools/appliance https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/4.5/tools/appliance If you need to add any iptables rules to fix the issue, you may make changes to this file: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/blob/4.5/systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
THx Rohit. On 7 May 2015 at 15:42, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi, On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess this is possibly on MGMT code side...? This is a very old wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Build+Your+Own+SystemVM+Templates Here is the code that builds systemvmtemplate: (see the README) https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/master/tools/appliance https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/tree/4.5/tools/appliance If you need to add any iptables rules to fix the issue, you may make changes to this file: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/blob/4.5/systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Andrija Panić
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Rohit On 07.05.2015 15:09, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Rene, The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 cloud database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to upgrade to ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already 4.5.1). This could probably be the case in your environment as well that caused those failures for you. I tested db upgrades today from ACS and CCP 4.2 and 4.3 versions to ACS 4.5.1 on MySQL 5.5 and 5.6, and I think they work out of the box with no changes needed. Thanks for your investigations! Since I could not reproduce it a second time, your analyses makes totally sense and as you mentioned before and which I have overlooked the tables were different, so in any case my error reporting can be ignored and closed as a false postive. Can not wait to see 4.5.1 in action! Thanks! René
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Andrija, On 07-May-2015, at 3:08 pm, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)… You and anyone in the community are welcome to vote and discuss issues. ... we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous releases also (4.3.x): Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451 The issue is by design and I imagine would haved existed in all 4.2+. But, since it does not introduce any regression or breaking feature/design I think we can try to address this as a design improvement in 4.5.2 or 4.6.0. Regards. After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do netstat on VM that is behind VPC, and you don't see real client remote IP, you see Source NAT IP of the VPC VR ! We isolated 1 problematic VR iptables rule - please check the issue... Lot of software behind VPC become uselsess, firewall, fail2ban,SIP/Asterisk/web server logs etc.. - since all connections from internet through VPC seems to come from VR... Thanks On 7 May 2015 at 14:57, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 with the following testing Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 Hypervisors Manual Tests via UI included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc) Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and confirming storage clean-up API Scripted tests included Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors. Dual Zone, with multiple PODs and Clusters. Manual Tests included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Upgrade VRs as Root Admin Updating Security Groups Adding / Removing Static NAT Adding / Removing Load Balancing Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing Adding / Removing AutoScaling Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 with following testing: Manual Testing: Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5 VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM VM Migration Affinity groups - anti affinity VM consoles VM and volume snapshots Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448 Resize volum, Download volume Snapshot policies Change password 2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the same tier, VPC ACL Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437 None of the issues are a blocker. -abhi On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM). When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option. I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v. Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid. On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)... ... we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous releases also (4.3.x): Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451 After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do netstat on VM that is behind VPC, and you don't see real client remote IP, you see Source NAT IP of the VPC VR ! We isolated 1 problematic VR iptables rule - please check the issue... Lot of software behind VPC become uselsess, firewall, fail2ban,SIP/Asterisk/web server logs etc.. - since all connections from internet through VPC seems to come from VR... Thanks On 7 May 2015 at 14:57, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 with the following testing Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 Hypervisors Manual Tests via UI included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc) Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and confirming storage clean-up API Scripted tests included Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and NAT Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors. Dual Zone, with multiple PODs and Clusters. Manual Tests included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Upgrade VRs as Root Admin Updating Security Groups Adding / Removing Static NAT Adding / Removing Load Balancing Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing Adding / Removing AutoScaling Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 with following testing: Manual Testing: Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5 VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM VM Migration Affinity groups - anti affinity VM consoles VM and volume snapshots Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448 Resize volum, Download volume Snapshot policies Change password 2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the same tier, VPC ACL Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437 None of the issues are a blocker. -abhi On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM). When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option. I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v. Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid. On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the other tier. It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR. However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0. Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier. If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network. I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc. Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first place. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; h= ref s/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai n; f=C HANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. Don't know if it does any benefit in a term of VR load. I do agree that isolation model of VPC is more strict and clean. Prevents from such backdors to happen. I just got wrong feeling, that such scenario is also supported, because it works unless I reboot. I also agree with your comments and will not consider this as an issue anymore. Thank you for detailed explaination - this is what I have been looking for. I have no issues for 4.5.1 to happen. Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:04 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the other tier. It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR. However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0. Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier. If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network. I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc. Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first place. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Daan, Private gateway is not for this purpose, but let's not confuse this thread, we can discuss it in more detail over a beer at the next User Group (far more fun) Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:04 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the other tier. It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR. However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0. Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier. If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network. I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc. Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first place. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the other tier. It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR. However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0. Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier. If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network. I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc. Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first place. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; h= ref s/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai n; f=C HANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= ref s/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain; f=C HANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did it work in 4.5.0? -- Erik
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; h= ref s/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai n; f=C HANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=ref s/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=C HANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= ref s/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain; f=C HANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Geoff, I always test upgrades (from whatever versions we have in prod) and no problems, but I only run Adv+SG zone.. I can destroy/create system VMs without problem. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 6 May, 2015 13:28:55 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi all,
I'm glad to let you know that ACS 4.5.1 has my +1.
Environment:
XenServer 6.2
MySQL/MariaDB 5.5.41
Management Server running CentOS 7
Component: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack (test/integration/component and
smoke)
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain ... === TestName:
test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify Non Root admin previleges ... === TestName:
test_01_non_root_admin_Privileges | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Remove one user from the account ... === TestName:
test_01_user_remove_VM_running | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify service offerings at same level in hierarchy ... === TestName:
test_01_service_offering_hierarchy | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify service offerings at same level in hierarchy ... === TestName:
test_01_service_offering_siblings | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test to verify template at same level in hierarchy ... === TestName:
test_01_template_hierarchy | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
--
Ran 14 tests in 1427.942s
OK
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_accounts_YP0DGH/results.txt
Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS
===
ok
Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS
===
ok
Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for
migration
Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm |
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
--
Ran 10 tests in 731.034s
OK (SKIP=1)
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_vm_life_cycle_F4OCL2/results.txt
Trying SSH Connection: Host:192.168.22.10 User:root
Port:22 RetryCnt:60===
===SSH to Host 192.168.22.10 port : 22 SUCCESSFUL===
{Cmd: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -ostricthostkeychecking=no
-oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p 3922 169.254.0.25 service dnsmasq status via
Host: 192.168.22.10} {returns: [u'Checking DNS forwarder and DHCP server:
dnsmasq(running).']}
Trying SSH Connection: Host:192.168.22.10 User:root
Port:22 RetryCnt:60===
Trying SSH Connection: Host:192.168.22.10 User:root
Port:22 RetryCnt:60===
===SSH to Host 192.168.22.10 port : 22 SUCCESSFUL===
===SSH to Host 192.168.22.10 port : 22 SUCCESSFUL===
{Cmd: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -ostricthostkeychecking=no
-oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p 3922 169.254.0.25 service haproxy status via
Host: 192.168.22.10} {returns: [u'haproxy is running.']}
{Cmd: ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -ostricthostkeychecking=no
-oUserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -p 3922 169.254.0.25 service haproxy status via
Host: 192.168.22.10} {returns: [u'haproxy is running.']}
Test router internal advanced zone ... === TestName:
test_02_router_internal_adv | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status
: SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS
===
ok
--
Ran 7 tests in 400.284s
OK
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Good news, we have found the cause of the problem I was experiencing with upgrade testing. It appears that when you register the new system vm template in 4.3 or 4.4 using the UI, it sets the HVM flag to true. As I was testing on a system using Nested Virtualisation which does not support HVM it caused it to fail post upgrade. Clean installs of 4.5 do not set the HVM flag so they were working OK. Rohit has identified the code to confirm this, and as this is just a quirk of my test environment I don’t see it as an issue (more from Rohit to follow shortly) So in regards to testing upgrades from 4.2 and 4.3 things are looking good, just want to finish some more tests on Basic Zones with Security Groups before I cast my final vote. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 16:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup tier, for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the vpc and some to not route, so you add a second nic to the systems you don't want to route. Ultimately it comes down to we can so why not allow the flexibility?. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the other tier. It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR. However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0. Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier. If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network. I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc. Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first place. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi all, I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the issue Geoff reported. The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no host found that is HVM). When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option. I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v. Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid. On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff. I will start testing an upgrade scenario now. Cheers, Wilder On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i will +1(binding) Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the threads Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 +1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Geoff, Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM without need to send all the requests to VPC router. But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web servers, and not just the database. The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them. -- Erik Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup tier, for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the vpc and some to not route, so you add a second nic to the systems you don't want to route. Ultimately it comes down to we can so why not allow the flexibility?. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Vadim, My first question is why would you want to? The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers. However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the other tier. It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR. However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0. Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier. If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network. I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc. Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first place. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know where to start. Vadim. -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote: Hi, I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer. The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test This is very important . but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at user list under subject VPC usage scenario Did you report bugs ? Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going) I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs. We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0 for now Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups build, in for a busy week! Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 06/05/2015 05:57, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; h= ref s/heads/4.5 Commit
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 (binding) On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi, In case anyone did not see my previous reply - I’m unable to reproduce the shared issue using ACS 4.2.1 and upgrading it to 4.5.1. So, kindly test for any issues before voting. On 05-May-2015, at 5:13 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sure, hence the -0 Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hey, no body casted a -1! I will probably not be testing in time and won't stop this release for that reason. if it works for anyone it should go out. If it doesn't work for me I'll call for a fix. The CCP issue, I didn't know about. I don't think we should abandon CCP users so a repair script should be made and the upgrade marked as no go in our matrix. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:23 schreef Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out. There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known or existing issues. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sure, hence the -0 Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out. There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known or existing issues. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sure, hence the -0 Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 (binding) Tested following vm lifecycle operations and other events; - DB upgrade testing from ACS 4.2.1, 4.3.2, 4.5.0 to ACS 4.5.1 candiate - Deploy zone, register primary/secondary storage pools, add/remove hosts - Register iso and template - Take snapshot, convert snapshot to volume/template, download template/snapshot/iso - Deploy VM using iso and template - Start, restart, stop, destroy/expunge VM - Password server and reset password feature (including load testing the password server with upto 1k QPS) - Local storage, storage migration across hosts and storage pool - Use local storage option for systemvm on zone basis - VM migration (in case of XenServer only) The following environment combinations were tested (using a nest virtualized environment running on KVM): 1. KVM (Ubuntu 14.04.2): - KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Basic Zone (no SG) - KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Basic Zone + with SG (tested ingress/egress rules) - KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Adv Zone + no SG (tested pf/lb/firewall rules, snat IP, VPC, VPN) - KVM (qemu 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) + Adv Zone + with SG (tested ingress/egress rules, VPC, VPN) 2. XenServer: - XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) + Basic Zone (no SG) - XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) + Basic Zone with SG (tested ingress/egress rules) - XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) + Adv Zone (no SG) (tested pf/lb/firewall rules, snat IP, VPC, VPN) - XenServer (6.2 and 6.5) + Adv Zone with SG (tested ingress/egress rules, VPC, VPN) 3. VMWare; (ESX 5.5.0 update1 with vCenter server 5.5.0 update1 on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1) - VMWare + Basic zone (note: SG is not supported on vmware, so only basic zone was tested) - VMWare + Adv zone (tested few basic ingress/egress rules) Notes: ESXi with vCenter did not work for me on KVM (I tried 5.0, 5.1, 5.5 up1/up2), I kept getting vmodl.fault.HostCommunication errors when adding the esxi host to vCenter. Apparently, ESXi 6.0 worked with vCenter all running on KVM (qemu 2.2) but unfortunately I could n’t test with it as vCenter/ESXi 6.0 not supported by ACS yet. I was able to test the above with running ESXi/vCenter 5.5.0up1 setup on VMWare Fusion with the mgmt server running on OSX. In my case the secondary storage had to be mounted locally on /mnt/sec (also shared by Mike couple of months ago on some thread) as it failed creation of ssvms. Packaging testing: - On CentOS7 or CentOS6 with java-1.8.0-openjdk installed, installation fails with conflict statements so admins know they need to remove jdk 1.8; openjdk 1.7 is installed with agent/mgmt/usage packages - Installations on Ubuntu/Debian would stop tomcat6 (so it won’t conflict with mgmt server) - CentOS 6/7 packages install without issues on CentOS 6.5, 7.1 and Fedora 20 (use EL7 repo for F20), but it fails for Fedora 21 (due to no openjdk 1.7 package). - Debian packages worked on Ubuntu 14.04, 14.10 and on Debian7 but not on systemd based Ubuntu 15.04 server or Debian 8.0 Other remarks: - VPN for VPC/isolated network works on Windows, but is broken on OSX [due to openswan limitation - nothing can be do; we can either support OSX (with forced nat option) but that breaks Windows clients] - In case of both Xen and KVM, if vlan was not vlan://untagged in Adv zone with SG I was unable to access any VMs (as I could n’t understand how to configure vlans in test environment which running hosts in VMs as nested VMs on a KVM host). Though in case of vlan://untagged (in Adv zone + SG), it seems to work but with no vlan tagging it beats the purpose - Fixed a minor packaging issue on 4.5 when installing both mgmt server and agent, they would both create /var/log/cloudstack/agent and thus fail the last package from being installed. On 04-May-2015, at 8:44 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: +1 (binding) from me based on testing upgrades from 4.4.1/4.4.3 and basic operations in Adv+SG zones. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 4 May, 2015 12:20:31 Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
sure, hence the -0 Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x There is no such upgrade path. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:35 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 Hi Rene, Thanks for reporting. I’ve just deployed a ACS 4.2.1 DB and upgraded to ACS 4.5.1, and found no exceptions. Did you try this on a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 or was it CCP 4.2.1? (in production we have seen db upgrade issues if customers were using CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x or later). The alter statements are on two different tables (cloud_usage and usage_vm_instance) so ideally won’t cause conflicts unless the columns were already altered due to one of the above issues. On 05-May-2015, at 3:47 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://secure-web.cisco.com/1vX318gyxL4Oe_mcG02NfiWqimjUBdOtkVeHs9W17sQLcJAZyYirdUOSCa0McOXHpb1XP0jGEX3VBxsj66GV6pOoQ7tvib63bdzWyl8NZkaeZSTnecYWadC9AsZleVsQWdN0GPWwogqO5s6T2XctNWl2Boy8sULvDB8DaA8SuV1aDoD_jJL-Iv1o7VBKlMeok/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack%2Ftesting%2F http://secure-web.cisco.com/1fQSBXRwcrmw1AEPk8-GQY0qtbJaJXTTTXUYkHdEmysbMTQ4BNC0nH_5btdDBbi7n4v1kePAl0mI8_2qstKq6mx6xwknEdWOBXowed7JCXUT1PuqbcfRHDWRlMheLKUBer9nngthDuBxA-kEDY00HnQxfHk1NG1bClrI0Q1FCc0qyFyJ1mYRKaCDhSjr_oNVo/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fsystemvmtemplate%2F4.5%2F Regards. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1xVV_M7hhnn8cgGg61N2LyuxSk0GPg-YpBXFY4qSnYXN8ZICBbfyjajnvXqN_wSdwFsetkR1bBWF1zFslosw3dv-8wvy-9PkeJY6K5cXHZoHCH57WMrj5WEEaVhNhDjcpBMWnZjgmexEVJN-QwK-WCZpH5QAo3K68EUaKI8A7ws5ILPj4-rwlFJV3Rkpprwef/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fiaas-cloud-design-and-build%2F%2F CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1n4gQ-oLFtPfblmUSTZNtAU7AmfO2LAHSWvT7szlmeSAd_wDb0VC4jaY73TSaT6OMDG4I65_jrCUsuXelqffo6d2hQia1H2tr6EIO3-hfsrVj3H9rAad-sKZSiTI6Mj7FRfIEjjQ9nC-Y0CZg_NtbIezk2V6t2TOphxIPnSdijmwrYnEEW3AteVg1W0MqABm0/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcsforge%2F CloudStack Consultinghttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1Q4T9A-00nBO5sNHhLN_4rkNULddNsmcMwAzPgw5W3M8jdW2aD1v7cZtw-BEjhdFFNkbLpdQM02QPAtPOi5nHuuUhAOO8rv4tbdFUWGBuNKB097uKC6QL2XkuW2r6S-zbuFqvnKvn2PMSyKr3y40cbSOflbbzY46F-tCesxiQivjEFx6Ku01Q4QEL9DHxEQMr/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-consultancy%2F CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1VJzal5QF0KLvLTGCQUn346UBwwkvjUH5J9ZhwW9l-iU7Uem4au9Hav5uJkL0bn4pPG8d70pmoMmCGX-VtfGASyQank1Z75rGv-4pAGu-__73Gm5yWQpiOf0f1-WNthIRVTvawemt-_eIFxh9I3lBZpjyJU3Cdf1lDT6eyRDYuYKNzLEAQ8A-xukJWG6hU6yz/http%3A%2F%2Fshapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack-software-engineering%2F CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://secure-web.cisco.com/1lw5WX7xKXlPSNumjMNQb_qknnBtwnS
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Agree with Marcus. I believe the workaround to the issue pointed out by Rene should be straightforward and could be documented. Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 11:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out. There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known or existing issues. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sure, hence the -0 Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://secure-web.cisco.com/1b1vlXKxcmtbajS10D8YjJtCJx9gLBtS6uOu-s_0Nw0eNnKs55Iui3WsTAH5g2cTnFi0rtNEkv7MdwjwLPceAcBrI6OJG-FrTx8FgWDE11d6A2TelB07RII9VrJoZ1IPaash5qBEx0bUxhcKZWJUZ9FetzYvHfNgtMfDCBhzzfPnjm52KTP9OR1wQuC45gbpt/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fcloudstack%2Ftesting%2F http://secure-web.cisco.com/1mr_7sYWtvS-bituPzxPKg1YPOAZ7qsBSZstvdrgBGOlvmXxA831h8hOtHuYcaMznbm7dnwVYvk1Nd6MprUXIhLm6ZRequo7lr86ynjgadz5gP6qar5vsS1MOmeM5CmS_7qs1rvEatWEvlS0acpvGerOwJDn26OuhPJIcceGvFv9Pz1OgOi0rDC5_aB3fsmUY/http%3A%2F%2Fpackages.shapeblue.com%2Fsystemvmtemplate%2F4.5%2F Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Thanks for running with this Rohit. +1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi I am not able to reproduce anymore. vote 0 from me! Yours René Am 5. Mai 2015 17:02:47 MESZ, schrieb Marcus shadow...@gmail.com: This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard. Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser m...@renemoser.net: Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Somesh, On 05-May-2015, at 5:39 pm, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x There is no such upgrade path. You’re missing the context :) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and schema-430to440.sql https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql#L464 Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update. Not really sure if this would brake anything in other conditions. It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it. Yours René On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 (binding) from me based on testing upgrades from 4.4.1/4.4.3 and basic operations in Adv+SG zones. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 4 May, 2015 12:20:31 Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1 Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5 Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and location to download systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi I've tried again with my own RPMS this time and with the Jenkins systemvm template, but still no go. It seems like I will get randomly the local primary storage shown twice ... Rohit, have you had any luck with those logs? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 18:32:22 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, Here's the table you requested: http://fpaste.org/209313/53496142/raw/ And the old management logs - be advised they're ~3MB and may contain several upgrade procedures as I have not deleted the logs in between some of my tests: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-old-management-server.log Thanks! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 17:45:50 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, I’m still very much interested in your cloud.storage_pool table which should have two entries. Can you dig them up and share them (perhaps privately if it’s an issue for you) with me along with pre-upgrade logs? I’ll try again tomorrow, along with few other issues that I’ve identified. A recent change I’ve done is to use latest open-vm-tools from wheezy-backports (for vmware) and install xstools-6.5 on 4.5+ systemvms which should improve systemvm performance on xen and vmware hosts. On 10-Apr-2015, at 9:58 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Rohit, Thanks for your effort to test. This problem does not seem to affect VM lifecycle. I will repeat my tests on fresh installations, but I will have to postpone this until next week, with the Easter coming and all. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 08:59:39 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, I’ve tried to setup a similar environment and tried upgrading 4.4.1 (KVM+local storage) to 4.5.1 and I could not reproduce it even after two clean attempts. I read through the logs and the only local storage path I found was: 5da7e725-d33a-43f8-afc7-d0ee0741bdb3 (1707.cloud.priv). The logs you shared are only include things after the upgrade. Can you grep the logs before you did the upgrade searching for “/var/lib/libvirt/images” or any local storage related to hostname 1707.cloud.priv. Also, can you share the db results of: select * from cloud.storage_pool; Lastly, even if you see two local storage pools - does it cause failure of any normal vm lifecycle operations? On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Thanks a lot, Rohit, let's hope it'll be an easy one. What I've noticed happening is as you create instances, they will be spread among the 2 duplicate pools. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 16:51:34 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow and see if I can reproduce (and possibly fix) the issue. The repository I created and shared has exactly these two extra patches on top of 4.5.1 RC2: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6c5cf04d6242cd23cc1e7ea982529df9f27fcb1c (blocker) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1ef585f9e65e0854984211f11d5c2c7c2977a957 (ui fix) Regards. On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Marcus, I can't check if the guid has changed, but the upgrade was a normal one done using yum update from Rohit's el6 repo. To make things more confusing, 2 upgrades ended up with duplicated local storage, but my last test has not. I'll do a couple more tests today to see if the issue is consistent. I'll keep an eye on the guids. +1 what you said re bugfix releases. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 05:56:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or removed/installed? Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions. In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release, that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process. On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi Lucian, Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow and see if I can reproduce (and possibly fix) the issue. The repository I created and shared has exactly these two extra patches on top of 4.5.1 RC2: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6c5cf04d6242cd23cc1e7ea982529df9f27fcb1c (blocker) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1ef585f9e65e0854984211f11d5c2c7c2977a957 (ui fix) Regards. On 09-Apr-2015, at 8:35 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Ok, I dropped all DBs, rm -rf `rpm -ql cloudstack*`, rm -rf /etc/cloudstack then installed 4.4.1, added some templates, made sure everything runs ok then upgraded to your 4.5.1 packages. I ended up again with duplicated storage pools like in the case above. Agent.properties looks like this: #Storage #Thu Apr 09 14:18:35 BST 2015 guest.network.device=br0 workers=5 private.network.device=br0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 hypervisor.type=kvm guid=b1095892-3100-3d78-955f-7e39648c4898 public.network.device=br0 cluster=1 local.storage.uuid=51b13fc9-5ce4-466e-a836-7302e7516f02 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 host=10.10.175.227 Management agent logs from the moment I started the services with the upgraded version: http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-management-server.log http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log Any ideas? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Rohit, This is KVM/CentOS6/Adv+SG. 1 VM running management + 1 bare metal HV. I'm reinstalling now from your repo, start with 4.4.1 (what I have in prod) and try to upgrade to 4.5.1. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi Lucian, 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic zone/advance zone? I only have one baremetal host to test it, while I can try to reproduce the issue you’re facing using two or more devcloud-kvms. Please advise. I fixed an issue where local storage pool uuids were created using hostname instead of them being random, could this have caused the regression: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf17f640c679bab1bd740d4eb068deb1bc2eb3af With the above fix, what I did was to use random UUID instead of creating one using the local storage path since it fails a case for me when I tried to add two different hosts with same hostname. On 09-Apr-2015, at 5:39 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools. I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi Lucian, Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce the issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a next RC3 voting thread. On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Awesome, will test shortly. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 10:26:37 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 Hi all, I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing SystemVM templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5 I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8372 You'll only hit this issue if you: 1. try to upload/setup a SSL certificate for use with CPVM 2. enable and use the experimental SAML2 auth plugin (since it creates and stores x509 certificates in keystore table) So, please test either using the above fix if testing the above features. Applying this fix, I tested ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and following works: - basic zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, local storage, snapshots and SG rules with KVM - advanced zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, snapshots, local storage, vpc, firewall/port forwarding rules with KVM In addition, ran a load test of deploying 200 VMs across 10 accounts/domains with small local storage offering (1GB RAM, 1core, 10GB local disk) on 30 xen hosts across two pods and it went fine with no errors. Note: the repo I shared does not have the above mentioned bugfix. On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Hi all, I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing SystemVM templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5 I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8372 You'll only hit this issue if you: 1. try to upload/setup a SSL certificate for use with CPVM 2. enable and use the experimental SAML2 auth plugin (since it creates and stores x509 certificates in keystore table) So, please test either using the above fix if testing the above features. Applying this fix, I tested ACS 4.5.1 RC2 and following works: - basic zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, local storage, snapshots and SG rules with KVM - advanced zone deployment, basic vm lifecycles, templates, snapshots, local storage, vpc, firewall/port forwarding rules with KVM In addition, ran a load test of deploying 200 VMs across 10 accounts/domains with small local storage offering (1GB RAM, 1core, 10GB local disk) on 30 xen hosts across two pods and it went fine with no errors. Note: the repo I shared does not have the above mentioned bugfix. On Tuesday 07 April 2015 11:28 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
-1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or removed/installed? Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions. In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release, that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process. On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Thanks, Pierre-Luc On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364 *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure - on April 17th *Register now https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442* On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n...@li.nux.ro'); wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com'); To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@cloudstack.apache.org'); Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','da...@gnsa.us'); wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com'); o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Mike, I did reproduce it in 4.5.1rc1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8364 *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ Join our webinar introducing cloud.ca - Canada's cloud infrastructure - on April 17th *Register now https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/717597728964573442* On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: -1 After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local storage pool registered 2 times. Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete actually works): Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class. Is anyone else able to reproduce this? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Are we going to do a new RC soon? Le vendredi 27 mars 2015, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 binding on future ACS 4.5.1 RC2 To report back, I've tested ACS 4.5.1 on limited scale with vmware. No issues observed so far, test cases covered: vm created disk attached snapshots work deletion works console works etc.. On 3/24/15 10:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any Vmware specific changes. On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/ 53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/ d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/ d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 binding on future ACS 4.5.1 RC2 To report back, I've tested ACS 4.5.1 on limited scale with vmware. No issues observed so far, test cases covered: vm created disk attached snapshots work deletion works console works etc.. On 3/24/15 10:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any Vmware specific changes. On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Rohit, Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 responsejson sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc= vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74 If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed However if I then run (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 It succeeds! accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86 cmd = org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBalancerRuleCmd created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+ jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b jobprocstatus = 0 jobresult: success = True jobresultcode = 0 jobresulttype = object jobstatus = 1 userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0 I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same thing. When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the following: TypeError: args.context is undefined var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]); So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules and the UI Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Geoff, I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools: command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule response:json id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6 vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184 Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it? Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response instead of hard coding it. It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915 The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178 Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this? On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi all, The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now). On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 responsejson sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc= vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74 If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed However if I then run (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 It succeeds! accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86 cmd = org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBalancerRuleCmd created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+ jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b jobprocstatus = 0 jobresult: success = True jobresultcode = 0 jobresulttype = object jobstatus = 1 userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0 I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same thing. When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the following: TypeError: args.context is undefined var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]); So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules and the UI Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Geoff, I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools: command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule response:json id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6 vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184 Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it? Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response instead of hard coding it. It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915 The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178 Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this? On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Good work Rohit Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi all, The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now). On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 responsejson sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc= vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74 If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed However if I then run (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 It succeeds! accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86 cmd = org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala ncerRuleCmd created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+ jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b jobprocstatus = 0 jobresult: success = True jobresultcode = 0 jobresulttype = object jobstatus = 1 userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0 I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same thing. When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the following: TypeError: args.context is undefined var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]); So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules and the UI Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Geoff, I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools: command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule response:json id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6 vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184 Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it? Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response instead of hard coding it. It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915 The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff; h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178 Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this? On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Pierre, I’ve added an extra check to fallback and use hardcoded list of algorithms if the list/context in unavailable. On 27-Mar-2015, at 12:33 am, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote: Rohit, by any chance , does this fix this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8231 ? Thanks! On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Good work Rohit Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi all, The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now). On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 responsejson sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc= vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74 If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed However if I then run (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 It succeeds! accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86 cmd = org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala ncerRuleCmd created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+ jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b jobprocstatus = 0 jobresult: success = True jobresultcode = 0 jobresulttype = object jobstatus = 1 userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0 I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same thing. When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the following: TypeError: args.context is undefined var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]); So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules and the UI Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Geoff, I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools: command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule response:json id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6 vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184 Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it? Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response instead of hard coding it. It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915 The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff; h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178 Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this? On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Rohit, by any chance , does this fix this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8231 ? Thanks! On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Good work Rohit Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi all, The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now). On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Rohit, Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 responsejson sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc= vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74 If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed However if I then run (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 It succeeds! accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86 cmd = org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala ncerRuleCmd created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+ jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b jobprocstatus = 0 jobresult: success = True jobresultcode = 0 jobresulttype = object jobstatus = 1 userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0 I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same thing. When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the following: TypeError: args.context is undefined var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]); So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules and the UI Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Geoff, I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools: command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule response:json id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6 vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184 Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it? Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response instead of hard coding it. It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915 The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff; h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178 Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this? On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Geoff, I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools: command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule response:json id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6 vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184 Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it? Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response instead of hard coding it. It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915 The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178 Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this? On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f 776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d 7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Rohit, I will take this off the list and email you directly. We can then report back to Dev list once we are done testing.. Regards ilya On 3/24/15 10:13 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any Vmware specific changes. On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
-1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f 776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d 7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
awesome - thanks Geoff. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load Balancing Rules. When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works. It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also affect Advanced Zones. A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f 776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d 7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hello, Does anyone have an idea when the 4.5.1 is going to be out including the packaged versions? It has been a while since the unfortunate, but well spotted, release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes shortly. Cheers Andrei - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 (+ users) Hi all, I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ 4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ (If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM templates). Happy testing! On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote: I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank spots. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Andrei, I'm certain you are aware of this, but if you really have to move forward with 4.5.1, why not build from source? You can then upgrade once we are ready with 4.5.1 As of now, we are waiting to see if more issues will surface before calling RC2 vote. I've been running ACS 4.5 in lab envs for some time and also tested upgrade path from 4.3 to 4.5. Regards ilya On 3/24/15 5:28 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: Hello, Does anyone have an idea when the 4.5.1 is going to be out including the packaged versions? It has been a while since the unfortunate, but well spotted, release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes shortly. Cheers Andrei - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 (+ users) Hi all, I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ 4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ (If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM templates). Happy testing! On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote: I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank spots. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
HI Ilya - I've added a SecureSSLFactory implementation (POODLE fix) after 4.5.0 that is used by VmwareClient and other clients. Other than that I don’t see any Vmware specific changes. On 25-Mar-2015, at 7:05 am, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I'll see if i can spin up another test. Based on fixes i've seen post 4.5.0, they are not VmWare specific (unless i'm wrong). I have several vmware test environments running in 4.5 - we are yet to see any issue. On 3/23/15 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything. Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we do RC2 if possible? On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
I got nothing. Go with rc2 as far as I'm concerned. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: David Nalley da...@gnsa.us To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2015 01:51:02 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else before I do so. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: Rohit, While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this warrants RC2 release. David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2? Thanks ilya On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
(+ users) Hi all, I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ 4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/ (If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your SystemVM templates). Happy testing! On Friday 20 March 2015 02:06 AM, David Nalley wrote: I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank spots. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
-1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi everyone, Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed. Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect only CentOS6 users. In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top of RC1 and please continue testing: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f776c87eac334f185 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f89bdd8c885b2a2 On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: -1 Regression caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312 Causes: Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject When trying to deploy system VM templates. Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage. SSVM and CPVM do not get created Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests. Thanks Rohit for the packages. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1 +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below) Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations (after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts - Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served 1000 req/second with 95.7% successful http request completion (though I realize ab is not really a good tool) - Egress rules, Firewall rules, port forwarding SNAT usage, load balancing - Register template and ISO - VM statistics, dashboard capacity values - Observed normal CPVM, SSVM behaviours - Use of both NFS and local primary storage - Download volume, iso, template - VPC: multiple tiers, password server + load tests, vm lifecycle with/without local storage, SNAT for vms in tiers, ACL rules create/update/delete/apply etc Basic Zone testing with/without local storage, KVM: - Basic zone with local storage, vm lifecycle - Volume migration (after stopped) - Attach/detach volumes - NFS primary+secondary and local storage primary - Normal CPVM, SSVM behaviour seen - Register template/iso worked - Download volume, iso, template - Shared network with SG worked - Password server tested, reset password Minor issues: - RC1 will require this minor centos6 rpm build fix that we can slip in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d7f 89bdd8c885b2a2 Note: centos7 builds are fine. - UI logs out on refresh (due to known CSRF fix) or opening in another tab. On Thursday 19 March 2015 08:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank spots. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi David, You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put 4.5.1 here instead. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581 tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 19/03/2015 15:40, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi All, I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429 Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
